Green criminology

Last updated

Green criminology is a branch of criminology that involves the study of harms and crimes against the environment broadly conceived, including the study of environmental law and policy, the study of corporate crimes against the environment, and environmental justice from a criminological perspective. [1]

Contents

Origins

The term "green criminology" was introduced by Michael J. Lynch in 1990, and expanded upon in Nancy Frank and Michael J. Lynch's 1992 book, Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence, [2] which examined the political economic origins of green crime and injustice, and the scope of environmental law. The term became more widely used following publication of a special issue on green criminology in the journal Theoretical Criminology edited by Piers Beirne and Nigel South in 1998. [3] Green criminology has recently started to feature in university-level curriculum and textbooks in criminology and other disciplinary fields. [4]

The study of green criminology has expanded significantly over time, and is supported by groups such as the International Green Criminology Working Group. [5] There are increasing interfaces and hybrid empirical and theoretical influences between the study of green criminology, which focuses on environmental harms and crimes, and mainstream criminology and criminal justice, with criminologists studying the 'greening' of criminal justice institutions and practices in efforts to become more environmentally sustainable and the involvement of people in prison or on probation in ecological justice initiatives. [6] [7] [8]

Approaches

Though green criminology was originally proposed as a political economic approach for the study of environmental harm, crime, law and justice, there are now several varieties of green criminology as noted below. [9]

Political economy, environmental justice, and the treadmill of production approach

The initial grounding of green criminology was in political economic theory and analysis. In his original 1990 article, [10] Lynch proposed green criminology as an extension of radical criminology and its focus on political economic theory and analysis. In that view, it was essential to examine the political economic dimensions of green crime and justice in order to understand the major environmental issues of our times and how they connect with the political economy of capitalism. The political economic approach was expanded upon by Lynch and Paul B. Stretesky in two additional articles in TheCritical Criminologist. [11] [12] In those articles, Lynch and Stretesky extended the scope of green criminology to apply to the study of environmental justice, and followed that work with a series of studies addressing environmental justice concerns, [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] the distribution of environmental crimes and hazards, [18] [19] and empirical studies of environmental justice movements and enforcement. [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] Later, working with Michael A. Long and then Kimberly L. Barrett, the political economic explanation and empirical studies of green crimes were adapted to include a perspective on the structural influence of the treadmill of production on the creation of green crimes [25] [26] [27] [28] drawn from the work of Allan Schnaiberg, environmental sociology, eco-socialism and ecological Marxism. Throughout the development of the political economic approach to green criminology, scholars have made significant use of scientific and ecological literatures, as well as empirical analysis, which have become characteristics of this approach and distinguish it from other varieties of green criminology.

Nonspeciesist and nonhuman animal studies

The second major variation of green criminology is the nonspeciesist argument proposed by Piers Beirne. [29] In Beirne's view, the study of harms against nonhuman animals is an important criminological topic which requires attention and at the same time illustrates the limits of current criminological theorizing about, crime/harm, law and justice with its focus almost exclusively on humans. [30] This approach also includes discussions of animal rights. Beirne's approach to green criminology has been extremely influential, and there are now a significant number of studies within the green criminological literature focusing on nonhuman animal crimes and animal abuse. [31] In addition to studies of animal abuse, included within the scope of nonhuman animal studies are those focused on illegal wildlife trade, poaching, wildlife smuggling, animal trafficking and the international trade in endangered species. [32] [33] [34] Many of the studies green criminologists undertake in this area of research are theoretical or qualitative. Ron Clarke and several colleagues, however, have explored empirical examinations of illegal animal trade and trafficking, [35] [36] [37] [38] and this has become a useful approach for examining green crimes. Clarke's approach draws on more traditional criminological theory such as rational choice theory and crime opportunity theory, and hence is not within the mainstream of green criminological approaches. Nevertheless, Clarke's approach has drawn attention to important empirical explanations of green crimes.

Bio-piracy and eco-crimes

Similar to the political economic approach but without grounding in political economic theory, some green criminologists have explored the issue of green crime by examining how corporate behavior impacts green crimes. [39] Among other issues, this approach has included discussions of eco-crimes and activities such as bio-piracy as discussed by Nigel South. [40] Bio-piracy is largely an effort by corporations to commodify native knowledge and to turn native knowledge and practices into for-profit products while depriving native peoples of their rights to that knowledge and those products, and in most cases, avoiding payments to natives for their knowledge or products. Bio-piracy includes issues of social and economic justice for native peoples. These kinds of crimes fall into the category of eco-crimes, a term associated with the work of Reece Walters. [41] Also included within the examination of eco-crimes is the analysis of other ecologically harmful corporate behaviors such as the production of genetically modified foods [42] and various forms of toxic pollution. [43]

Ecocide

Ecocide describes attempts to criminalize human activities that cause extensive damage to, destruction of or loss of ecosystems of a given territory; and which diminish the health and well-being of species within these ecosystems including humans. It involves transgressions that violate the principles of environmental justice, ecological justice and species justice. When this occurs as a result of human behaviour, advocates argue that a crime has occurred. However, this has not yet been accepted as an international crime by the United Nations. [44]

Eco-global criminology

Some of those who study environmental crime and justice prefer the use of Rob White's term, eco-global criminology. [45] In proposing this term, White suggested that it is necessary to employ a critical analysis of environmental crime as it occurs in its global context and connections. [46] Similar to Lynch's political economic approach to green criminology, White has also noted that it is desirable to refer to the political economy of environmental crime, and to social and environmental justice issues.

Green-cultural criminology

As proposed by Avi Brisman and Nigel South [47] green-cultural criminology attempts to integrate green and cultural criminology to explore the cultural meaning and significance of terms such as "environment" and "environmental crime". Green-cultural criminology goes against traditional approaches in regards to criminology, bringing attention to social harms and social consequences. [48]

Conservation criminology

Conservation criminology is complementary to green criminology. Originally proposed by an interdisciplinary group of scholars from the Department of Fisheries & Wildlife, School of Criminal Justice, and Environmental Science & Policy Program at Michigan State University, conservation criminology seeks to overcome limitations inherent to single-discipline science and provide practical guidance about on-the-ground reforms. [49] [50] Conservation criminology is an interdisciplinary and applied paradigm for understanding programs and policies associated with global conservation risks. By integrating natural resources management, risk and decision science, and criminology, conservation criminology-based approaches ideally result in improved environmental resilience, biodiversity conservation, and secure human livelihoods. As an interdisciplinary science, conservation criminology requires the constant and creative combination of theories, methods, and techniques from diverse disciplines throughout the entire processes of research, practice, education, and policy. Thinking about the interdisciplinary nature of conservation criminology can be quite exciting but does require patience and understanding of the different languages, epistemologies and ontologies of the core disciplines. Conservation criminology has been extensively applied to extralegal exploitation of natural resources such as wildlife poaching in Namibia [51] and Madagascar [52] corruption in conservation, [53] e-waste, [54] and general noncompliance with conservation rules. [55] By relying on multiple disciplines, conservation criminology leapfrogs this ideal; it promotes thinking about second- and third-order consequences of risks, not just isolated trends.

Green Crime and Media

The way of seeing eco-crime through media in the form of images portrays racism. [56] Photography is very powerful tool to generate perspective and interpretation when representing the eco-crime. The blackness of the eco-crime be it in just a background or sillhoutte of the people on the site of eco-crime or the title of the images which has a racist content can be a tool to racialize the community where eco-crime happens or creating a symbol where green crime is black. [56] Reading race through an image is one of beneficial approach to see how racism pictured through an images of eco-crime. [56] Moreover, the meaning of green also deducted by media. [57] Media advertisement tend to use all the so called "go green" to sell the product eventhough the product is not really a sustainable product and not environmentally friendly. [57] This act by media to advertise their product to increase selling by sabotasing the "go green" movement is called 'greenwashing'. [57] Criminologist and media should study and create a focus on how the media portrays eco-crime to provide an equal information free from bias be it gender and race as well as eager to pay an attention towards green offender (e.g. corporations which violate environmental laws). [56] [58]

Green criminological theory

It is often noted that green criminology is interdisciplinary and as a result, lacks its own unique theory or any preferred theoretical approach. Moreover, significant portions of the green criminological literature are qualitative and descriptive, and those studies have generally not proposed a unique or unifying theory. Despite this general lack of a singular theory, some of the approaches noted above indicate certain theoretical preferences. For example, as noted, the political economic approach to green criminology develops explanations of green crime, victimization and environmental justice consistent with several existing strains of political economic analysis. Beirne's approach takes an interdisciplinary view of theory with respect to various animal rights models and arguments. Clarke's rational choice models of animal poaching and trafficking build on the rational choice tradition found within the criminological literature. To date, these different theoretical approaches have not been examined as competing explanations for green crime and justice, a situation that is found with respect to orthodox or traditional criminological theories of street crime.

Related Research Articles

In ordinary language, a crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state or other authority. The term crime does not, in modern criminal law, have any simple and universally accepted definition, though statutory definitions have been provided for certain purposes. The most popular view is that crime is a category created by law; in other words, something is a crime if declared as such by the relevant and applicable law. One proposed definition is that a crime or offence is an act harmful not only to some individual but also to a community, society, or the state. Such acts are forbidden and punishable by law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poaching</span> Illegal hunting of wildlife

Poaching is the illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals, usually associated with land use rights. Poaching was once performed by impoverished peasants for subsistence purposes and to supplement meager diets. It was set against the hunting privileges of nobility and territorial rulers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restorative justice</span> Restitution with input from victims and offenders

Restorative justice is an approach to justice that aims to repair the harm done to victims. In doing so, practitioners work to ensure that offenders take responsibility for their actions, to understand the harm they have caused, to give them an opportunity to redeem themselves, and to discourage them from causing further harm. For victims, the goal is to give them an active role in the process, and to reduce feelings of anxiety and powerlessness. Restorative justice programs can also complement traditional methods, such as retributive justice, and it has been argued that some cases of restorative justice constitute punishment from the perspectives of some positions on what punishment is.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime science</span>

Crime science is the study of crime in order to find ways to prevent it. It is distinguished from criminology in that it is focused on how crime is committed and how to reduce it, rather than on who committed it. It is multidisciplinary, notably recruiting scientific methodology rather than relying on social theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Critical criminology</span> School of criminology

Critical criminology applies critical theory to criminology. Critical criminology examines the genesis of crime and the nature of justice in relation to factors such as class and status, Law and the penal system are viewed as founded on social inequality and meant to perpetuate such inequality. Critical criminology also looks for possible biases in criminological research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental criminology</span>

Environmental criminology focuses on criminal patterns within particular built environments and analyzes the impacts of these external variables on people's cognitive behavior. It forms a part of criminology's Positivist School in that it applies the scientific method to examine the society that causes crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxist criminology</span> School of criminology

Marxist criminology is one of the schools of criminology. It parallels the work of the structural functionalism school which focuses on what produces stability and continuity in society but, unlike the functionalists, it adopts a predefined political philosophy. As in conflict criminology, it focuses on why things change, identifying the disruptive forces in industrialized societies, and describing how society is divided by power, wealth, prestige, and the perceptions of the world. It is concerned with the causal relationships between society and crime, i.e. to establish a critical understanding of how the immediate and structural social environment gives rise to crime and criminogenic conditions. William Chambliss and Robert Seidman explain that "the shape and character of the legal system in complex societies can be understood as deriving from the conflicts inherent in the structure of these societies which are stratified economically and politically".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Positivist school (criminology)</span> School of thought in criminology

The Positivist School was founded by Cesare Lombroso and led by two others: Enrico Ferri and Raffaele Garofalo. In criminology, it has attempted to find scientific objectivity for the measurement and quantification of criminal behavior. Its method was developed by observing the characteristics of criminals to observe what may be the root cause of their behavior or actions. Since the Positivist's school of ideas came around, research revolving around its ideas has sought to identify some of the key differences between those who were deemed "criminals" and those who were not, often without considering flaws in the label of what a “criminal” is.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminist school of criminology</span> School of criminology

The feminist school of criminology is a school of criminology developed in the late 1960s and into the 1970s as a reaction to the general disregard and discrimination of women in the traditional study of crime. It is the view of the feminist school of criminology that a majority of criminological theories were developed through studies on male subjects and focused on male criminality, and that criminologists often would "add women and stir" rather than develop separate theories on female criminality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Routine activity theory</span> Theory in criminology

Routine activity theory is a sub-field of crime opportunity theory that focuses on situations of crimes. It was first proposed by Marcus Felson and Lawrence E. Cohen in their explanation of crime rate changes in the United States between 1947 and 1974. The theory has been extensively applied and has become one of the most cited theories in criminology. Unlike criminological theories of criminality, routine activity theory studies crime as an event, closely relates crime to its environment and emphasizes its ecological process, thereby diverting academic attention away from mere offenders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wildlife trade</span> Worldwide industry dealing in the acquisition and sale of wildlife

Wildlife trade refers to the products that are derived from non-domesticated animals or plants usually extracted from their natural environment or raised under controlled conditions. It can involve the trade of living or dead individuals, tissues such as skins, bones or meat, or other products. Legal wildlife trade is regulated by the United Nations' Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which currently has 184 member countries called Parties. Illegal wildlife trade is widespread and constitutes one of the major illegal economic activities, comparable to the traffic of drugs and weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural criminology</span> Anthropological view of crime

Cultural criminology is a subfield in the study of crime that focuses on the ways in which the "dynamics of meaning underpin every process in criminal justice, including the definition of crime itself." In other words, cultural criminology seeks to understand crime through the context of culture and cultural processes. Rather than representing a conclusive paradigm per se, this particular form of criminological analysis interweaves a broad range of perspectives that share a sensitivity to “image, meaning, and representation” to evaluate the convergence of cultural and criminal processes.

Radical criminology states that society "functions" in terms of the general interests of the ruling class rather than "society as a whole" and that while the potential for conflict is always present, it is continually neutralised by the power of a ruling class. Radical criminology is related to critical and conflict criminology in its focus on class struggle and its basis in Marxism. Radical criminologists consider crime to be a tool used by the ruling class. Laws are put into place by the elite and are then used to serve their interests at the peril of the lower classes. These laws regulate opposition to the elite and keep them in power.

Market reduction approach (MRA) is an approach to reducing crime by reducing the opportunity for thieves to fence or resell what they have stolen.

Susanne Karstedt is a German criminologist. She is a professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminology</span> Study of crime and criminal actions/behavior

Criminology is the interdisciplinary study of crime and deviant behaviour. Criminology is a multidisciplinary field in both the behavioural and social sciences, which draws primarily upon the research of sociologists, political scientists, economists, legal sociologists, psychologists, philosophers, psychiatrists, social workers, biologists, social anthropologists, scholars of law and jurisprudence, as well as the processes that define administration of justice and the criminal justice system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public criminology</span> Academic tendency within criminology

Public criminology is an approach to criminology that disseminates criminological research beyond academia to broader audiences, such as criminal justice practitioners and the general public. Public criminology is closely tied with “public sociology”, and draws on a long line of intellectuals engaging in public interventions related to crime and justice. Some forms of public criminology are conducted through methods such as classroom education, academic conferences, public lectures, “news-making criminology”, government hearings, newspapers, radio and television broadcasting and press releases. Advocates of public criminology argue that the energies of criminologists should be directed towards "conducting and disseminating research on crime, law, and deviance in dialogue with affected communities." Public criminologists focus on reshaping the image of the criminal and work with communities to find answers to pressing questions. Proponents of public criminology see it as potentially narrowing "the yawning gap between public perceptions and the best available scientific evidence on issues of public concern", a problem they see as especially pertinent to matters of crime and punishment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anarchist criminology</span> School of thought in criminology

Anarchist criminology is a school of thought in criminology that draws on influences and insights from anarchist theory and practice. Building on insights from anarchist theorists including Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and Peter Kropotkin, anarchist criminologists' approach to the causes of crime emphasises what they argue are the harmful effects of the state. Anarchist criminologists, a number of whom have produced work in the field since the 1970s, have critiqued the political underpinnings of criminology and emphasised the political significance of forms of crime not ordinarily considered to be political. Anarchists propose the abolition of the state; accordingly, anarchist criminologists tend to argue in favour of forms of non-state justice. The principles and arguments of anarchist criminology share certain features with those of Marxist criminology, critical criminology and other schools of thought within the discipline, while also differing in certain respects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gregg Barak</span> American criminologist, academic, and author

Gregg Barak is an American criminologist, academic, and author. He is an emeritus professor of criminology and criminal justice at Eastern Michigan University, a former visiting distinguished professor in the College of Justice & Safety at Eastern Kentucky University, and a 2017 Fulbright Scholar in residence at the School of Law, Pontificia Universidade Catholica, Porto Alegre, Brazil. He is most known for his research in the fields of criminology and criminal justice.

Ragnhild Sollund is a Norwegian professor and author. She is professor of Criminology at the University of Oslo. Sollund has published widely in the area of migration, violence, police racial profiling and green criminology particularly relating to wildlife conservation. She is internationally recognized as one of the pioneers of green criminology, which studies the relationship between nature and society in a eco-global perspective, as well as the harms and crimes humans cause the natural environment and nonhuman animals.

References

  1. ↑ Nurse, Angus (2017-10-31). "Green criminology: shining a critical lens on environmental harm". Palgrave Communications. 3 (1): 1–4. doi: 10.1057/s41599-017-0007-2 . ISSN   2055-1045.
  2. ↑ Frank, Nancy (Nancy K. ) (1992). Corporate crime, corporate violence : a primer. New York : Harrow and Heston. ISBN   978-0-911577-23-5.
  3. ↑ South, Nigel; Beirne, Piers (May 1998). "Editors' Introduction". Theoretical Criminology. 2 (2): 147–148. doi:10.1177/1362480698002002001. ISSN   1362-4806. S2CID   220321224.
  4. ↑ White, Rob (2014-02-03). Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm (1 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203096109. ISBN   978-0-203-09610-9.
  5. ↑ "Green Criminology". Green Criminology. Retrieved 2019-04-22.
  6. ↑ Graham, Hannah; White, R. D. (2015). "4". Innovative justice. London: Routledge. ISBN   978-0-203-09605-5.
  7. ↑ White, Rob; Graham, Hannah (September 2015). "Greening Justice: Examining the Interfaces of Criminal, Social and Ecological Justice". British Journal of Criminology. 55 (5): 845–865. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu117. ISSN   0007-0955.
  8. ↑ Moran, D.; Jewkes, Y. (2014-12-22). ""Green" prisons: rethinking the "sustainability" of the carceral estate". Geographica Helvetica. 69 (5): 345–353. doi: 10.5194/gh-69-345-2014 . ISSN   2194-8798.
  9. ↑ For a general guide to green criminology, its definition, and varieties see, South, Nigel, Avi Brisman, and Piers Beirne. (2013). A guide to a green criminology. Pp. 27-42 in N. South and A. Brisman (eds), The Routledge international handbook of green criminology. UK: Routledge.
  10. ↑ Lynch, J. Michael (2017-07-05). "The Greening of Criminology: A Perspective on the 1990s". In South, Nigel; Beime, Piers (eds.). Green Criminology (1 ed.). Routledge. pp. 165–170. doi:10.4324/9781315093390-7. ISBN   978-1-315-09339-0.
  11. ↑ Lynch, Michael J. and Paul B. Stretesky. 1999. Clarifying the Analysis of Environmental Justice: Further Thoughts on the Critical Analysis of Environmental Justice Issues. The Critical Criminologist. 9,3: 5-8
  12. ↑ Lynch, Michael; Stretesky, Paul (1998). "Uniting Class, Race and Criticism Through the Study of Environmental Justice" (PDF). The Critical Criminologist. 9 (1).
  13. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Lynch, Michael J. (September 2002). "Environmental Hazards and School Segregation in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1987–1999". The Sociological Quarterly. 43 (4): 553–573. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2002.tb00066.x. ISSN   0038-0253.
  14. ↑ Stretesky, Paul; Lynch, Michael J. (1999). "Environmental Justice and the Predictions of Distance to Accidental Chemical Releases in Hillsborough County, Florida". Social Science Quarterly. 80 (4): 830–846. ISSN   0038-4941. JSTOR   42864408.
  15. ↑ Stretesky, Paul; Lynch, Michael J. (1998). "Corporate environmental violence and racism". Crime, Law and Social Change. 30 (2): 163–184. doi:10.1023/A:1008393401769.
  16. ↑ Lynch, Michael J.; Stretesky, Paul B.; Burns, Ronald G. (April 2004). "Determinants of Environmental Law Violation Fines Against Petroleum Refineries: Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Aggregation Effects". Society & Natural Resources. 17 (4): 333–347. Bibcode:2004SNatR..17..333L. doi:10.1080/08941920490278782. ISSN   0894-1920.
  17. ↑ Lynch, Michael J.; Stretesky, Paul B.; Burns, Ronald G. (January 2004). "Slippery Business: Race, Class, and Legal Determinants of Penalties Against Petroleum Refineries". Journal of Black Studies. 34 (3): 421–440. doi:10.1177/0021934703258756. ISSN   0021-9347.
  18. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Lynch, Michael J. (April 2011). "Coal Strip Mining, Mountaintop Removal, and the Distribution of Environmental Violations across the United States, 2002–2008". Landscape Research. 36 (2): 209–230. Bibcode:2011LandR..36..209S. doi:10.1080/01426397.2010.547572. ISSN   0142-6397.
  19. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Lynch, Michael J. (March 2009). "A cross-national study of the association between per capita carbon dioxide emissions and exports to the United States". Social Science Research. 38 (1): 239–250. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.08.004.
  20. ↑ Lynch, Michael J.; Stretesky, Paul B. (2013-03-01). "The distribution of water-monitoring organizations across states: Implications for community environmental policing and social justice". Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. 36 (1): 6–26. doi:10.1108/13639511311302452. ISSN   1363-951X.
  21. ↑ Lynch, Michael J.; Stretesky, Paul B. (2011). "Native Americans and Social and Environmental Justice: Implications for Criminology". Social Justice. 38 (3 (125)): 104–124. ISSN   1043-1578. JSTOR   41940950.
  22. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Huss, Sheila; Lynch, Michael J. (2012-09-01). "Density dependence and environmental justice organizations, 1970–2008". The Social Science Journal. 49 (3): 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2012.03.002. ISSN   0362-3319.
  23. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Huss, Sheila; Lynch, Michael J.; Zahran, Sammy; Childs, Bob (August 2011). "The Founding of Environmental Justice Organizations Across U.S. Counties during the 1990s and 2000s: Civil Rights and Environmental Cross-Movement Effects". Social Problems. 58 (3): 330–360. doi:10.1525/sp.2011.58.3.330.
  24. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; O'Connor Shelley, Tara; Crow, Matthew S. (December 2010). "Do Conservation Organizations Influence the Production of Natural Resource Violations?". Organization & Environment. 23 (4): 398–416. doi:10.1177/1086026610385902. ISSN   1086-0266.
  25. ↑ Long, Michael A.; Stretesky, Paul B.; Lynch, Michael J.; Fenwick, Emily (September 2012). "Crime in the Coal Industry: Implications for Green Criminology and Treadmill of Production". Organization & Environment. 25 (3): 328–346. doi:10.1177/1086026612452266. ISSN   1086-0266.
  26. ↑ Lynch, M. J.; Long, M. A.; Barrett, K. L.; Stretesky, P. B. (2013-11-01). "Is it a Crime to Produce Ecological Disorganization? Why Green Criminology and Political Economy Matter in the Analysis of Global Ecological Harms". British Journal of Criminology. 53 (6): 997–1016. doi:10.1093/bjc/azt051. ISSN   0007-0955.
  27. ↑ Stretesky, Paul; Long, Michael; Lynch, Michael (2013-08-15). The Treadmill of Crime. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203077092. ISBN   978-1-135-12942-2.
  28. ↑ Stretesky, Paul B.; Long, Michael A.; Lynch, Michael J. (July 2013). "Does environmental enforcement slow the treadmill of production? The relationship between large monetary penalties, ecological disorganization and toxic releases within offending corporations". Journal of Crime and Justice. 36 (2): 233–247. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2012.752254. ISSN   0735-648X.
  29. ↑ Beirne, Piers (February 1999). "For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study". Criminology. 37 (1): 117–148. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00481.x. ISSN   0011-1384.
  30. ↑ Beirne, Piers (2009). Confronting animal abuse: law, criminology, and human-animal relationships. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-0-7425-4743-8.
  31. ↑ For examples see the special issue of Crime, Law and Social Change Beirne has edited (volume 55, number 5); Cazaux, Geertrui. 1999. Beauty and the beast: Animal abuse from a non-speciesist criminological perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change 31, 2 : 105-125.
  32. ↑ van Uhm, D.P. (2016). The Illegal Wildlife Trade: Inside the World of Poachers, Smugglers and Traders (Studies of Organized Crime). Vol. 15. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42129-2. ISBN   978-3-319-42128-5.
  33. ↑ Green Criminology & Wildlife Trafficking: the illegal fur and falcon trades in Russia Far East.
  34. ↑ Wyatt, Tanya (February 2009). "Exploring the organization of Russia Far East's illegal wildlife trade: two case studies of the illegal fur and illegal falcon trades". Global Crime. 10 (1–2): 144–154. doi:10.1080/17440570902783947. ISSN   1744-0572.
  35. ↑ Lemieux, A. M.; Clarke, R. V. (2009-07-01). "The International Ban on Ivory Sales and its Effects on Elephant Poaching in Africa". British Journal of Criminology. 49 (4): 451–471. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp030. ISSN   0007-0955.
  36. ↑ Clarke, Ronald V.; de By, Rolf A. (September 2013). "Poaching, habitat loss and the decline of neotropical parrots: a comparative spatial analysis". Journal of Experimental Criminology. 9 (3): 333–353. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9177-0. ISSN   1573-3750.
  37. ↑ Pires, Stephen; Clarke, Ronald V. (February 2012). "Are Parrots CRAVED? An Analysis of Parrot Poaching in Mexico". Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 49 (1): 122–146. doi:10.1177/0022427810397950. ISSN   0022-4278.
  38. ↑ Pires, S. F.; Clarke, R. V. (2011-03-01). "Sequential Foraging, Itinerant Fences and Parrot Poaching in Bolivia". British Journal of Criminology. 51 (2): 314–335. doi:10.1093/bjc/azq074. ISSN   0007-0955.
  39. ↑ Ruggiero, Vincenzo; South, Nigel (September 2013). "Green Criminology and Crimes of the Economy: Theory, Research and Praxis". Critical Criminology. 21 (3): 359–373. doi:10.1007/s10612-013-9191-6. ISSN   1205-8629.
  40. ↑ South, Nigel (2017-07-05). White, Rob (ed.). The 'corporate colonisation of nature': 1 Bio-prospecting, bio-piracy and the development of green criminology (1 ed.). Routledge. pp. 341–358. doi:10.4324/9781315084589-21. ISBN   978-1-315-08458-9.
  41. ↑ Walters, Reece (2006-01-01). "Crime, Bio-Agriculture and the Exploitation of Hunger". The British Journal of Criminology. 46 (1): 26–45. doi:10.1093/bjc/azi049. ISSN   1464-3529.
  42. ↑ Walters, Reece (April 2007). "Food Crime, Regulation and the Biotech Harvest". European Journal of Criminology. 4 (2): 217–235. doi:10.1177/1477370807074856. ISSN   1477-3708.
  43. ↑ Walters, Reece (December 2010). "Toxic Atmospheres Air Pollution, Trade and the Politics of Regulation". Critical Criminology. 18 (4): 307–323. doi:10.1007/s10612-010-9119-3. ISSN   1205-8629.
  44. ↑ White, Rob (2014-02-03). Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm (1 ed.). Routledge. pp. 45–59. doi:10.4324/9780203096109. ISBN   978-0-203-09610-9.
  45. ↑ White, Rob (2018-10-08). Transnational Environmental Crime (0 ed.). Willan. doi:10.4324/9780203804001. ISBN   978-1-136-63759-9.
  46. ↑ White, Rob (2009-09-01). "Researching Transnational Environmental Harm: Toward an Eco-Global Criminology". International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. 33 (2): 229–248. doi:10.1080/01924036.2009.9678807. ISSN   0192-4036.
  47. ↑ Brisman, Avi; South, Nigel (August 2013). "A green-cultural criminology: An exploratory outline". Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal. 9 (2): 115–135. doi:10.1177/1741659012467026. ISSN   1741-6590.
  48. ↑ Nigel, South (2013). Routledge International Handbook of Green Criminology. Routledge. p. 349.
  49. ↑ Gibbs, C.; Gore, M. L.; McGarrell, E. F.; Rivers, L. (2010-01-01). "Introducing Conservation Criminology: Towards Interdisciplinary Scholarship on Environmental Crimes and Risks". British Journal of Criminology. 50 (1): 124–144. doi:10.1093/bjc/azp045. ISSN   0007-0955.
  50. ↑ Gore, Meredith L. (2011-08-01). "The Science of Conservation Crime". Conservation Biology. 25 (4): 659–661. Bibcode:2011ConBi..25..659G. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01701.x . ISSN   1523-1739. PMID   21771074.
  51. ↑ Gore, Meredith L; Ratsimbazafy, Jonah; Rajaonson, Andry; Lewis, Amanda; Kahler, Jessica S (2016-07-12). "Public perceptions of poaching risks in a biodiversity hotspot: Implications for wildlife trafficking interventions". ResearchGate. 2016 (21).
  52. ↑ Gore, Meredith L.; Lute, Michelle L.; Ratsimbazafy, Jonah H.; Rajaonson, Andry (2016-04-15). "Local Perspectives on Environmental Insecurity and Its Influence on Illegal Biodiversity Exploitation". PLOS ONE. 11 (4): e0150337. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1150337G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150337 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4833313 . PMID   27082106.
  53. ↑ Gore, Meredith L.; Ratsimbazafy, Jonah; Lute, Michelle L. (2013-11-01). "Rethinking Corruption in Conservation Crime: Insights from Madagascar". Conservation Letters. 6 (6): 430–438. Bibcode:2013ConL....6..430G. doi:10.1111/conl.12032. ISSN   1755-263X. S2CID   86265716.
  54. ↑ Gibbs, Carole; McGarrell, Edmund F.; Axelrod, Mark (2010-08-01). "Transnational white-collar crime and risk". Criminology & Public Policy. 9 (3): 543–560. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00649.x. ISSN   1745-9133.
  55. ↑ Solomon, Jennifer N.; Gavin, Michael C.; Gore, Meredith L. (2015-09-01). "Detecting and understanding non-compliance with conservation rules". Biological Conservation. 189: 1–4. Bibcode:2015BCons.189....1S. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.028 .
  56. 1 2 3 4 Bertenthal, A (2022-06-14). "The Colour of Eco-Crime". The British Journal of Criminology. 63 (3): 615–633. doi:10.1093/bjc/azac027. ISSN   0007-0955.
  57. 1 2 3 Lynch, Michael J.; Stretsky, Paul B. (May 2003). "The Meaning of Green: Contrasting Criminological Perspectives". Theoretical Criminology. 7 (2): 217–238. doi:10.1177/1362480603007002414. ISSN   1362-4806. S2CID   89605388.
  58. ↑ The Routledge handbook of environmental justice. Ryan B. Holifield, Jayajit Chakraborty, Gordon P. Walker. London. 2018. ISBN   978-1-315-67898-6. OCLC   994552088.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.