Behavioral geography

Last updated

Behavioral geography is an approach to human geography that examines human behavior by separating it into different parts. In addition, behavioral geography is an ideology/approach in human geography that makes use of the methods and assumptions of behaviorism to determine the cognitive processes involved in an individual's perception of or response and reaction to their environment. Behavioral geographers focus on the cognitive processes underlying spatial reasoning, decision making, and behavior.

Contents

Behavioral geography is the branch of human science which deals with the study of cognitive processes with its response to its environment through behaviorism.

Issues

Because of the name it is often assumed to have its roots in behaviorism. While some behavioral geographers clearly have roots in behaviorism [1] [2] due to the emphasis on cognition, most can be seen as cognitively oriented. Indeed, it seems that behaviorism interest is more recent [3] and growing. [1] This is particularly true in the area of human landscaping.

Behavioral geography draws from early behaviorist works such as Tolman's concepts of "cognitive maps". More cognitively oriented, behavioral geographers focus on the cognitive processes underlying spatial reasoning, decision making, and behavior. More behaviorally oriented geographers are materialists and look at the role of basic learning processes and how they influence the landscape patterns or even group identity. [4]

The cognitive processes include environmental perception and cognition, wayfinding, the construction of cognitive maps, place attachment, the development of attitudes about space and place, decisions and behavior based on imperfect knowledge of one's environs, and numerous other topics.

The approach adopted in behavioral geography is closely related to that of psychology, but draws on research findings from a multitude of other disciplines including economics, sociology, anthropology, transportation planning, and many others.

The Social Construction of Nature

Nature is the world which surrounds us, including all life (plants, animals, organisms, humans, etc.) and physical features. Social Construction is the way that human beings process the world around us in our minds. According to Plato's 'Classical Theory of Categorization', humans create categories of what they see through experience and imagination. [5] Social constructionism, therefore, is this characterization that makes language and semantics possible. [5] If these experiences and imageries are not placed into categories, then the human ability to think about it becomes limited. [5]

The social construction of nature looks to question different truths and understandings for how people treat nature, based on when and where someone lives. In academic circles, researchers look at how truths exist (ontology) and how truths are justified (epistemology). [5] Construction is both a process and an outcome, where people's understandings of the word nature can be both literal and metaphorical, [6] such as through giving it a human quality (Mother Nature). [7] It can also be used to discredit science or philosophy. [6]

As a subset of behavioral geography, the social construction of nature also includes environmental ethics and values, which affect how humans treat, and interact with, the natural environment. It incorporates ideas from environmental science, ecology, sociology, geography, biology, theology, philosophy, psychology, politics, economics, and other disciplines, to bring together the social, cultural and environmental dimensions of life. Social constructionism uses a lot of ideas from Western world thinking, but it is also incorporates truths from other world views, such as the Traditional Knowledge of Aboriginal groups, or more specifically ecofeminism [8] [9] and cosmology [9] in India or ubuntu [10] philosophy in Africa, for example. It is also related to postmodernism [11] and the concept of the Anthropocene, [12] that views humans as a force that is redirecting the geological history of Earth, [7] destroying nature. [13]

The Role of Linguistics

Raymond Williams, author of Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (1983). Raymond Williams At Saffron Walden.jpg
Raymond Williams, author of Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (1983).

There are many ways of understanding and interpreting nature. [7] According to Raymond Williams, there are three ways to give meaning to (or define) nature:

  1. Nature as a quality, character or process [7] (e.g. human nature)
  2. Nature as a force [7] (e.g. weather)
  3. Nature as the material world [7] (e.g. the physical environment)

According to Raymond Williams, language plays a role in how we understand, interpret, and give meaning to nature. [7] This is how multiple truths can be valid at the same time. [5] [7]

The Role of Mental Maps

Humans have the ability to create images of their environments through experiences in their mind. [14] These experiences allow us to create mental maps where we can create memories associated to space. [14] It is a two-way process where the environment provides suggestions for what should be seen, and then the observer gives meaning with those suggestions. [14]

These images have three parts:

  1. An identity [14]
  2. A pattern [14]
  3. A practical or emotional meaning [14]

According to Kevin Lynch, the environmental images (or mental maps) that we make can either be weak or strong, where the process is ongoing and never stops. [14]

The Role of Science

Science occurs at many dimensions and scales that do not consider culture, but can be motivated by politics, economics and ethics. [15] Scientific knowledge consists of concepts and analysis, and is a way to represent nature. [11]

According to Michel Foucault, a truth does not have to be close to reality for it to be worth something or have power. [15] For Carolyn Merchant, science can only be given power if a truth is interpreted as having worth. [15]

Schools of Thought

Relativism is important in the social construction of nature, as all truths are relative to the perspective they are coming from. There are two schools of thought on how the social construction of nature is relative:

  1. Critical Realism (being realistic) [11]
  2. Pragmatism (being practical) [11]

Critical realists reject the idea of relativism and rely more on natural sciences. [11] Pragmatists have no set opinion on the matter and rely on social science and ethics, instead. [11]

According to Richard Rorty, relativism is relevant to pragmatism in three ways:

  1. Every belief is equally valid [11]
  2. There are no criteria for what a truth can be [11]
  3. That any truth can be justified by the society it comes from [11]

According to Gilbert White, pragmatism has four main assumptions:

  1. That human existence is based on putting labor into the land [11]
  2. That the idea of owning anything is a conception [11]
  3. That humans learn from their experiences [11]
  4. That engagement of the publics is what allows for commitments [11]

Richard Rorty also associated three characteristics to pragmatism:

  1. That all theories characterize some form of truth [11]
  2. That there is not difference between what can and should be done when it comes to the truth [11]
  3. That knowledge is constrained by the conversations we have [11]

Being pragmatic is the more accepted school of thought for social construction being a relative concept. [11]

Historical Overview

Rachel Carson, author of Silent Spring (1962). Rachel Carson w.jpg
Rachel Carson, author of Silent Spring (1962).

Recovery Narratives

Transitions in Thought

How Nature becomes Socially Constructed

Vandana Shiva, author of Staying Alive: Women, Culture, and Development (1988). Vandana shiva 20070610.jpg
Vandana Shiva, author of Staying Alive: Women, Culture, and Development (1988).

Nature can be socially constructed by both culturally interpreting and physically shaping the environment. [17] This can happen in three ways:

  1. Using non-human symbols to represent nature (Totemism) [17]
  2. Using non-human animals to relate to nature (Animism) [17]
  3. Viewing nature as an 'Other' (Naturalism) [17]

Constructions can also be categorized by giving them meaning through the process of embodiment, [5] which has three components:

  1. The 'habitus' (the individual) [5]
  2. The practice it originates from (the culture) [5]
  3. An associated taxonomic group (i.e. homo sapiens) [5]

No matter how nature becomes socially constructed, though, the process itself is limited by three dimensions:

  1. The physical dimension [5]
  2. The mental dimension [5]
  3. The social dimension [5]

The physical dimension is limited to the human body, where the brain is responsible for creating and selecting thoughts. [5] The mental dimension is used to understand the physical dimension and is limited to human logic. [5] The social dimension needs moral and social order and is used to give meaning to both what is physically present and what is culturally constructed. [5] All three dimensions must be present and linked to be able to socially construct nature. [5]

Criticism on the Social Construction of Nature

The social construction of nature has room for improvement in four main areas:

  1. By giving more importance to how realities are culturally constructed through social interactions [6]
  2. By acknowledging that all science should be analyzed by the same standard [6]
  3. By gaining a better understanding of the role language plays in constructionism [6]
  4. By giving more importance to how truths exist and how they are justified, using Actor-Network Theory [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

Behavior or behaviour is the range of actions and mannerisms made by individuals, organisms, systems or artificial entities in some environment. These systems can include other systems or organisms as well as the inanimate physical environment. It is the computed response of the system or organism to various stimuli or inputs, whether internal or external, conscious or subconscious, overt or covert, and voluntary or involuntary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive science</span> Interdisciplinary scientific study of cognitive processes

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary, scientific study of the mind and its processes with input from linguistics, psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, computer science/artificial intelligence, and anthropology. It examines the nature, the tasks, and the functions of cognition. Cognitive scientists study intelligence and behavior, with a focus on how nervous systems represent, process, and transform information. Mental faculties of concern to cognitive scientists include language, perception, memory, attention, reasoning, and emotion; to understand these faculties, cognitive scientists borrow from fields such as linguistics, psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, neuroscience, and anthropology. The typical analysis of cognitive science spans many levels of organization, from learning and decision to logic and planning; from neural circuitry to modular brain organization. One of the fundamental concepts of cognitive science is that "thinking can best be understood in terms of representational structures in the mind and computational procedures that operate on those structures."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human geography</span> Study of cultures, communities, and activities of peoples of the world

Human geography or anthropogeography is the branch of geography that studies spatial relationships between human communities, cultures, economies, and their interactions with the environment, examples of which include urban sprawl and urban redevelopment. It analyzes spatial interdependencies between social interactions and the environment through qualitative and quantitative methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning theory (education)</span> Theory that describes how students receive, process, and retain knowledge during learning

Learning theory describes how students receive, process, and retain knowledge during learning. Cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences, as well as prior experience, all play a part in how understanding, or a worldview, is acquired or changed and knowledge and skills retained.

Nature versus nurture is a long-standing debate in biology and society about the relative influence on human beings of their genetic inheritance (nature) and the environmental conditions of their development (nurture). The alliterative expression "nature and nurture" in English has been in use since at least the Elizabethan period and goes back to medieval French. The complementary combination of the two concepts is an ancient concept. Nature is what people think of as pre-wiring and is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Nurture is generally taken as the influence of external factors after conception e.g. the product of exposure, experience and learning on an individual.

Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. There are many different forms of relativism, with a great deal of variation in scope and differing degrees of controversy among them. Moral relativism encompasses the differences in moral judgments among people and cultures. Epistemic relativism holds that there are no absolute principles regarding normative belief, justification, or rationality, and that there are only relative ones. Alethic relativism is the doctrine that there are no absolute truths, i.e., that truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, such as a language or a culture. Some forms of relativism also bear a resemblance to philosophical skepticism. Descriptive relativism seeks to describe the differences among cultures and people without evaluation, while normative relativism evaluates the word truthfulness of views within a given framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pragmatism</span> Philosophical tradition

Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that views language and thought as tools for prediction, problem solving, and action, rather than describing, representing, or mirroring reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Worldview</span> Fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society

A worldview or a world-view or Weltanschauung is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge, culture, and point of view. A worldview can include natural philosophy; fundamental, existential, and normative postulates; or themes, values, emotions, and ethics.

Cultural ecology is the study of human adaptations to social and physical environments. Human adaptation refers to both biological and cultural processes that enable a population to survive and reproduce within a given or changing environment. This may be carried out diachronically, or synchronically. The central argument is that the natural environment, in small scale or subsistence societies dependent in part upon it, is a major contributor to social organization and other human institutions. In the academic realm, when combined with study of political economy, the study of economies as polities, it becomes political ecology, another academic subfield. It also helps interrogate historical events like the Easter Island Syndrome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constructivism (philosophy of science)</span> Branch in philosophy of science

Constructivism is a view in the philosophy of science that maintains that scientific knowledge is constructed by the scientific community, which seeks to measure and construct models of the natural world. According to the constructivist, natural science, therefore, consists of mental constructs that aim to explain sensory experience and measurements.

Behaviorism is a systematic approach to understanding the behavior of humans and other animals. It assumes that behavior is either a reflex evoked by the pairing of certain antecedent stimuli in the environment, or a consequence of that individual's history, including especially reinforcement and punishment contingencies, together with the individual's current motivational state and controlling stimuli. Although behaviorists generally accept the important role of heredity in determining behavior, they focus primarily on environmental events.

The psychology of learning refers to theories and research on how individuals learn. There are many theories of learning. Some take on a more behaviorist approach which focuses on inputs and reinforcements. Other approaches, such as theories related to neuroscience and social cognition, focus more on how the brain's organization and structure influence learning. Some psychological approaches, such as social constructivism, focus more on one's interaction with the environment and with others. Other theories, such as those related to motivation, like the growth mindset, focus more on individuals' perceptions of ability.

<i>The Blank Slate</i> 2002 book by Steven Pinker

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature is a best-selling 2002 book by the cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker, in which the author makes a case against tabula rasa models in the social sciences, arguing that human behavior is substantially shaped by evolutionary psychological adaptations. The book was nominated for the 2003 Aventis Prizes and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize.

Environmental psychology is a branch of psychology that explores the relationship between humans and the external world. It examines the way in which the natural environment and our built environments shape us as individuals. Environmental psychology emphasizes how humans change the environment and how the environment changes humans' experiences and behaviors. The field defines the term environment broadly, encompassing natural environments, social settings, built environments, learning environments, and informational environments. According to an article on APA Psychnet, environmental psychology is when a person thinks of a plan, travels to a certain place, and follows through with the plan throughout their behavior.

Hereditarianism is the doctrine or school of thought that heredity plays a significant role in determining human nature and character traits, such as intelligence and personality. Hereditarians believe in the power of genetics to explain human character traits and solve human social and political problems. Hereditarians adopt the view that an understanding of human evolution can extend the understanding of human nature.

The cognitive revolution was an intellectual movement that began in the 1950s as an interdisciplinary study of the mind and its processes. It later became known collectively as cognitive science. The relevant areas of interchange were between the fields of psychology, linguistics, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, and philosophy. The approaches used were developed within the then-nascent fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and neuroscience. In the 1960s, the Harvard Center for Cognitive Studies and the Center for Human Information Processing at the University of California, San Diego were influential in developing the academic study of cognitive science. By the early 1970s, the cognitive movement had surpassed behaviorism as a psychological paradigm. Furthermore, by the early 1980s the cognitive approach had become the dominant line of research inquiry across most branches in the field of psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of philosophy</span> List of definitions of terms and concepts commonly used in philosophy

This glossary of philosophy is a list of definitions of terms and concepts relevant to philosophy and related disciplines, including logic, ethics, and theology.

Religion and geography is the study of the impact of geography, i.e. place and space, on religious belief.

Ethnoscience has been defined as an attempt "to reconstitute what serves as science for others, their practices of looking after themselves and their bodies, their botanical knowledge, but also their forms of classification, of making connections, etc.".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pragmatic ethics</span> Theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics

Pragmatic ethics is a theory of normative philosophical ethics and meta-ethics. Ethical pragmatists such as John Dewey believe that some societies have progressed morally in much the way they have attained progress in science. Scientists can pursue inquiry into the truth of a hypothesis and accept the hypothesis, in the sense that they act as though the hypothesis were true; nonetheless, they think that future generations can advance science, and thus future generations can refine or replace their accepted hypotheses. Similarly, ethical pragmatists think that norms, principles, and moral criteria are likely to be improved as a result of inquiry.

References

  1. 1 2 Norton, William (22 September 2001). "Initiating an affair: human geography and behavior analysis". The Behavior Analyst Today. 2 (4): 283–290. doi:10.1037/h0099947. Gale   A170112831.
  2. Norton, William (22 March 2002). "Explaining landscape change: group identity and behavior". The Behavior Analyst Today. 3 (2): 155–161. doi:10.1037/h0099974. Gale   A170020699.
  3. Glass, John E. (22 September 2007). "Behavior analytic grounding of sociological social constructionism". The Behavior Analyst Today. 8 (4): 426–434. doi:10.1037/h0100631. Gale   A214102519.
  4. Norton, William (1 July 1997). "Human geography and behavior analysis: An application of behavior analysis to the explanation of the evolution of human landscapes". The Psychological Record. 47 (3): 439–460. doi:10.1007/BF03395237. S2CID   141975291.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Gerber, Judith (1 February 1997). "Beyond dualism – the social construction of nature and the natural and social construction of human beings". Progress in Human Geography. 21 (1): 1–17. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.925.2585 . doi:10.1191/030913297671906269. S2CID   10155447.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demeritt, David (1 December 2002). "What is the 'social construction of nature'? A typology and sympathetic critique". Progress in Human Geography. 26 (6): 767–790. doi:10.1191/0309132502ph402oa. S2CID   143479948.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Williams, R. (1983). Keyword: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.[ page needed ]
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. New York, NY: Routledge.[ page needed ]
  9. 1 2 Shiva, V. (1988). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development (1st ed.). London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.[ page needed ]
  10. Grange, Lesley Le (1 September 2012). "Ubuntu, ukama, environment and moral education". Journal of Moral Education. 41 (3): 329–340. doi:10.1080/03057240.2012.691631. S2CID   144817703.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Proctor, James D. (September 1998). "The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 88 (3): 352–376. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00105.
  12. Monastersky, Richard (March 2015). "Anthropocene: The human age". Nature. 519 (7542): 144–147. Bibcode:2015Natur.519..144M. doi: 10.1038/519144a . PMID   25762264. S2CID   4397643.
  13. Cronon, W. (1995). "The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature". Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co. pp. 69–90.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lynch, D. (1960). The Image of the City. MA: Harvard University Press.[ page needed ]
  15. 1 2 3 Pedynowski, Dena (1 December 2003). "Science(s) which, when and whose? Probing the metanarrative of scientific knowledge in the social construction of nature". Progress in Human Geography. 27 (6): 735–752. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph459oa. S2CID   144588735.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lowenthal, D. (1990). "Awareness of Human Impacts: Changing Attitudes and Emphases". In Turner, B.L. (ed.). The earth as transformed by human action: global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. pp. 121–135.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Peterson, Anna (1999). "Environmental Ethics and the Social Construction of Nature". Environmental Ethics. 21 (4): 339–357. doi:10.5840/enviroethics19992142.