Idotea balthica

Last updated

Idotea balthica
Idotea baltica.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Malacostraca
Superorder: Peracarida
Order: Isopoda
Family: Idoteidae
Genus: Idotea
Species:
I. balthica
Binomial name
Idotea balthica
(Pallas, 1772)
Synonyms
  • Idotea pusillaEichwald, 1842
  • Idotea balthica stagneaTinturier-Hamelin, 1960
  • Idotea balticaPallas, 1772 [orth. error]
  • Idotea basteriAudouin, 1826
  • Idotea sarsiCollinge, 1917
  • Idotea tricuspidataDesmarest, 1825
  • Idotea tridentataLatreille, 1806
  • Idotea variegataRoux, 1830
  • Oniscus balthicaPallas, 1772
  • Oniscus tridensScopoli, 1763
  • Stenosoma irrorataSay, 1818

Idotea balthica is a species of marine isopod [1] which lives on seaweed and seagrass [2] in the subtidal zone of rocky shores and sandy lagoons.

Contents

Distribution

Idotea balthica has a broad geographical distribution, having been recorded from the Belgian Exclusive Economic Zone, The British Isles, Cobscook Bay, Dutch Exclusive Economic Zone, European waters, Greek Exclusive Economic Zone, Gulf of Maine, Knokke, North West Atlantic, Red Sea, Voordelta, West Coast of Norway, Wimereux and the Black Sea. [1]

Appearance

The male is larger than female, and can reach 4 centimetres (1.6 in) long, while the female reaches a max length of around 1.8 cm. [3] [4] The male has most likely evolved to be larger than the female on average because larger size is more vital for the reproductive success of the male compared to the female. [5]

The color of the body is extremely variable, ranging from muted greens to striking black-and-silver patternings; the female is usually darker. [3] On the other hand, the males are frequently colored a light green. [6] Color intensity is variable and can be altered through the restriction and dilation of chromatophores. [6] Additionally, males and females display different coloration (sexual dimorphism) due to selection for different behaviors in the two sexes. [6] Researchers also believe that the primary cause of selection for this color polymorphism within localized populations is predation (from carnivorous fish, crabs) in conjunction with gene flow and varying microhabitats. [7] [8] The color polymorphism allows for the isopod to display cryptic coloration in multiple microhabitats. [6] [7]

The species can be distinguished from other idoteids by the shape of the telson, which is dorsally keeled with straight sides in I. balthica, and has a distinct protrusion at the end. [3]

Foraging

Adults are potentially omnivorous, [9] but mainly feed on different types of vegetation. In the Baltic, these include brown algae ( Fucus spp., Elachista fucicola, Pylaiella littoralis ), green algae ( Cladophora glomerata , Ulva spp.), and Phanerogams ( Stuckenia pectinata , Ruppia spp., Zostera marina ). [10]

In the Baltic, I. balthica prefers Fucus vesiculosus , an algal seaweed, as host plant over other algae and vascular plants. [11] The apical and basal parts of F. vesiculosus differ as food and as shelter, and males grow faster when fed with the apical parts, but females grow equally well with both. [12]

As a pollinator

In 2022, I. balthica was discovered to help Gracilaria gracilis reproduce – the first known case of an animal helping algae reproduce. [13] [14]

Habitat selection

The isopod selects their habitat based on a trade-off between limiting predator risk and maximizing food intake. These benefits and costs are evaluated differently between sexes, therefore there is a difference in the microhabitat selection between sexes. [15] Additionally, there are temporal variations in microhabitat selection. During the day, both sexes of the isopod generally are less active in their search for food than at night [5] and favor concealing habitats to limit the risk of detection by a predator. [15] This bias for a more concealing habitat and lower levels of activity becomes stronger when there is a higher risk of predation. [16] On the other hand, the isopods migrate more between microhabitats, to find food or mates, when they are concealed by night. [6]

Microhabitat choice is also impacted by the life stage of the organism, with the microhabitat selection of an adult being more heavily influenced by predator avoidance than that of a juvenile. [5] However, microhabitat selection is not dependent on the color morph of the organism. [7] [16] Conversely, varying microhabitat preferences between different colorations of this isopod produce differing levels of predation that select for a color polymorphism. [6]

Finally, their habitat selection is influenced by interspecific competition where the more dominant species will often outcompete the less dominant species in shared habitats and subsequently restrict the microhabitat choices of the less dominant species. [17] This effect is displayed in a study of the competition between Idotea balthica and Idotea emarginata in shared environments. [17] Idotea balthica appears to have to settle for migrating between suboptimal habitats while Idotea emarginata (the more dominant species) are able to settle permanently in habitats with better resources. [17]

Sex difference in microhabitat selection

The tradeoff between finding a place to hide from predators and finding food sources is impacted by the sex of the organism. Therefore there is a difference in microhabitat selection due to sex. [15] Some researchers propose that this sex difference in microhabitat selection is due to differential reproductive behaviors. [5] Researchers have found that males tend to move between microhabitats more often than females and are more inclined to be reckless in regards to predation risks. [15] Researchers believe that males display more recklessness than females because their reproductive success is more dependent on size than females, and therefore foraging contributes more to the fitness of the males. [5] [18]

Mating behaviors and conflicts

Generally, males are viewed as the more active party during mating. [19] During mating season, males engage in male to male competition to secure a mate. Not much is known about the mechanism of male-male competition, but sexual selection favors large appendages in males like larger secondary antennae. Presumably these features confer an advantage in male-male competition. [20]

Once the males have secured a mate, they will attempt to initiate pre-copulatory mate guarding to limit other males' access to the mated female. [19] [20] These pre-copulatory pairs are often initiated around a week before parturial ecdysis because the male wants to monopolize copulations of the female. [19] [20] If a pre-copulatory pair is formed, the male will carry the female around on its back until it undergoes moulting in two phases (anterior/posterior) and becomes receptive. [19] [20]

Other males will sometimes attempt to take over a mating pair if it is larger than the paired male. [19] This form of intrasexual competition is part of the reason why paired males tend to be larger on average than solitary males. [21]

Mate choice

Males display a preference for size, or a quality connected to size, in females. [21] Researchers believe this male preference for size is due to the larger reproductive output correlated with larger females of the species. [21] However, this male preference is hard to exert in the wild since males often can't compare the sizes of females. [21] Additionally, at the beginning of the breeding season, the operational sex ratio is male-biased (there are more sexually competing males than females) which causes the male to not display a size bias. [21] Although, female maturity is believed to be an even more important criteria for male selection [21] and sexual conflict may be a product of males trying to assess the maturation stage of a female. [19]

On the other hand, female resistance to mate guarding attempts is a way for females to engage in female mate choice. [19] Female resistance is a mechanism of selecting for larger sizes (or other phenotypic traits) in males because males with certain phenotypes are more effective in preserving pre-copulatory pairs, and therefore have a higher fitness. [19] Female resistance also selects for additional aggressiveness in males. [22] Certain phenotypes are also selected for in males by enabling them to be more successful at male-male competition. [21] [20]

Sexual conflict

Idotea balthica have a long pre-copulatory phase where the male will attempt to begin mate guarding well before the parturial ecdysis of the female. [19] Females may not comply with a mate guarding attempt because the female may not prefer the male attempting to mate guard, or because the cost of mate guarding at this point in the female's maturation cycle outweighs the benefits for the female. [19] Such costs can include a decrease in food resources, a loss of a microhabitat, and/or an increased risk of predation. [19] On the other hand, the struggles before pre-copulatory pair formation and mate guarding can also result in females incurring fitness costs in the form of decreased fecundity and stored energy compounds. [23]

Female resistance to mate guarding typically consists of the female writhing strongly to throw off the male. [19] If that mechanisms fails, then the female may bend their body ventrally into a round configuration to make it difficult for the male to remain situated on top of them. [19] Males may kick back in response to these resistance measures. [19] Either this leads to the male being kicked off, the female escaping, or, if the female is close to parturial ecdysis and the male perseveres through the resistances, a pre-copulatory mating pair formation. [19] Evidence has shown that the resolution of this conflict is frequently decided more by the female interest. [20]

The outcome of this conflict is dictated by the level of aggressiveness displayed by the male and female. [22] The level of aggressiveness displayed by both sexes is dependent on the benefits of a pre-copulatory pair compared to the costs of engaging in pre-copulatory mate guarding at a specific stage in the female's reproductive cycle. [22] The net result of engaging in a pair varies by population based on factors such as the operational sex ratio and the synchrony of reproduction. [22] The level of aggressiveness is also dependent on other characteristics, such as degree of size dimorphism, which influence the likelihood of winning the conflict. [22] Females have been found to display more resistance, and apply certain resistance maneuvers more frequently, when there is less size dimorphism in the population because the males are not as large and there is a lower of cost of resistance for the female and a greater chance for success. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection</span> Mode of natural selection involving the choosing of and competition for mates

Sexual selection is a mode of natural selection in which members of one biological sex choose mates of the other sex to mate with, and compete with members of the same sex for access to members of the opposite sex. These two forms of selection mean that some individuals have greater reproductive success than others within a population, for example because they are more attractive or prefer more attractive partners to produce offspring. Successful males benefit from frequent mating and monopolizing access to one or more fertile females. Females can maximise the return on the energy they invest in reproduction by selecting and mating with the best males.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polymorphism (biology)</span> Occurrence of two or more clearly different morphs or forms in the population of a species

In biology, polymorphism is the occurrence of two or more clearly different morphs or forms, also referred to as alternative phenotypes, in the population of a species. To be classified as such, morphs must occupy the same habitat at the same time and belong to a panmictic population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sperm competition</span> Reproductive process

Sperm competition is the competitive process between spermatozoa of two or more different males to fertilize the same egg during sexual reproduction. Competition can occur when females have multiple potential mating partners. Greater choice and variety of mates increases a female's chance to produce more viable offspring. However, multiple mates for a female means each individual male has decreased chances of producing offspring. Sperm competition is an evolutionary pressure on males, and has led to the development of adaptations to increase male's chance of reproductive success. Sperm competition results in a sexual conflict between males and females. Males have evolved several defensive tactics including: mate-guarding, mating plugs, and releasing toxic seminal substances to reduce female re-mating tendencies to cope with sperm competition. Offensive tactics of sperm competition involve direct interference by one male on the reproductive success of another male, for instance by mate guarding or by physically removing another male's sperm prior to mating with a female. For an example, see Gryllus bimaculatus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Viviparous lizard</span> Species of lizard

The viviparous lizard, or common lizard, is a Eurasian lizard. It lives farther north than any other species of non-marine reptile, and is named for the fact that it is viviparous, meaning it gives birth to live young. Both "Zootoca" and "vivipara" mean "live birth", in (Latinized) Greek and Latin respectively. It was called Lacerta vivipara until the genus Lacerta was split into nine genera in 2007 by Arnold, Arribas & Carranza.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common coquí</span> Species of amphibian

The common coquí, widely known as the coquí, is a species of frog native to Puerto Rico belonging to the family Eleutherodactylidae. The species is named for the loud call the males make at night, which serves two purposes; the "co" serves to repel other males and establish territory while the "quí" serves to attract females. The auditory systems of males and females respond preferentially to different notes of the male call, displaying sex difference in a sensory system. The common coquí is a very important aspect of Puerto Rican culture, and it has become an unofficial territorial symbol of Puerto Rico. The frog is also found elsewhere, and is usually considered an invasive species outside Puerto Rico.

Sexual mimicry occurs when one sex mimics the opposite sex in its behavior, appearance, or chemical signalling.

<i>Lampropholis delicata</i> Species of lizard

Lampropholis delicata, the delicate skink, dark-flecked garden sun skink, garden skink, delicate garden skink, rainbow skink or plague skink, or the metallic skink is native to Australia and invasive in New Zealand and Hawaii where it is commonly found in gardens. The species is known for their color dimorphism between males and females; striped morphs and non-striped morphs exist in this species, however the stripe is less pronounced in males. This species' diet consists of a wide range of prey, such as spiders, bees, larvae, and termites. Mating occurs in the late summer and generally one clutch of 2 to 4 eggs are laid per year by each female.

<i>Theridion grallator</i> Species of spider in the family Theridiidae

Theridion grallator, also known as the Hawaiian happy-face spider, is a spider in the family Theridiidae that resides on the Hawaiian Islands. T. grallator gets its vernacular name of "Hawaiian happy-face spider" from the unique patterns superimposed on its abdomen, specifically those that resemble a human smiling face. T. grallator is particularly notable because of its wide range of polymorphisms that may be studied to allow a better understanding of evolutionary mechanisms. In addition to the variety of color polymorphisms present, T. grallator demonstrates the interesting quality of diet-induced color change, in which its appearance temporarily changes as it metabolizes various food items.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual conflict</span> Term in evolutionary biology

Sexual conflict or sexual antagonism occurs when the two sexes have conflicting optimal fitness strategies concerning reproduction, particularly over the mode and frequency of mating, potentially leading to an evolutionary arms race between males and females. In one example, males may benefit from multiple matings, while multiple matings may harm or endanger females, due to the anatomical differences of that species. Sexual conflict underlies the evolutionary distinction between male and female.

<i>Thermosphaeroma thermophilum</i> Species of crustacean

Thermosphaeroma thermophilum is a crustacean in the family Sphaeromatidae. It is commonly known as the Socorro isopod or Socorro sowbug. It was endemic to the thermal water of Sedillo Spring, located in Socorro County, New Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mate guarding</span>

Mate guarding is a reproductive behaviour, primarily of males, in an attempt to increase the likelihood of success of their own sperm fertilizing the eggs of females when competition is involved. Mate guarding behaviour can be pre- or post-copulatory. Studies on the behaviour both based on theory and through experiments have been conducted on a wide range of species. Mate guarding also occurs in humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courtship display</span> Communication to start a relationship with someone or to get sexual contact

A courtship display is a set of display behaviors in which an animal, usually a male, attempts to attract a mate; the mate exercises choice, so sexual selection acts on the display. These behaviors often include ritualized movement ("dances"), vocalizations, mechanical sound production, or displays of beauty, strength, or agonistic ability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Six-spotted fishing spider</span> Species of spider

The six-spotted fishing spider is an arachnid from the nursery web spider family Pisauridae. This species is from the genus Dolomedes, or the fishing spiders. Found in wetland habitats throughout North America, these spiders are usually seen scampering along the surface of ponds and other bodies of water. They are also referred to as dock spiders because they can sometimes be witnessed quickly vanishing through the cracks of boat docks. D. triton gets its scientific name from the Greek mythological god Triton, who is the messenger of the big sea and the son of Poseidon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in birds</span>

Sexual selection in birds concerns how birds have evolved a variety of mating behaviors, with the peacock tail being perhaps the most famous example of sexual selection and the Fisherian runaway. Commonly occurring sexual dimorphisms such as size and color differences are energetically costly attributes that signal competitive breeding situations. Many types of avian sexual selection have been identified; intersexual selection, also known as female choice; and intrasexual competition, where individuals of the more abundant sex compete with each other for the privilege to mate. Sexually selected traits often evolve to become more pronounced in competitive breeding situations until the trait begins to limit the individual's fitness. Conflicts between an individual fitness and signaling adaptations ensure that sexually selected ornaments such as plumage coloration and courtship behavior are "honest" traits. Signals must be costly to ensure that only good-quality individuals can present these exaggerated sexual ornaments and behaviors.

Sexual coercion among animals is the use of violence, threats, harassment, and other tactics to help them forcefully copulate. Such behavior has been compared to sexual assault, including rape, among humans.

An alternative mating strategy is a strategy used by male or female animals, often with distinct phenotypes, that differs from the prevailing mating strategy of their sex. Such strategies are diverse and variable both across and within species. Animal sexual behaviour and mate choice directly affect social structure and relationships in many different mating systems, whether monogamous, polygamous, polyandrous, or polygynous. Though males and females in a given population typically employ a predominant reproductive strategy based on the overarching mating system, individuals of the same sex often use different mating strategies. Among some reptiles, frogs and fish, large males defend females, while small males may use sneaking tactics to mate without being noticed.

<i>Gerris</i> Genus of true bugs

Gerris is a bug genus in the family Gerridae.

Gerris buenoi is a species of water strider that belongs to the family Gerridae. It was first identified in 1911 and is native to continental USA and Canada. Individuals of this species are small in size and have modified appendages, allowing them to float and "skate" along the surface of the water. G. buenoi can be found near the shoreline of freshwater ponds and small lakes, where they hunt for terrestrial insects that have fallen into the water.

Sepsis thoracica, more commonly known as the black scavenger fly, a species of fly from the genus Sepsis and the family Sepsidae. It was discovered by Robineau-Desvoidy in 1830. It resembles a small flying ant. The fly is most commonly found inhabiting cow dung.

<i>Carabus japonicus</i> Species of ground beetle that predominates in Japan

Carabus japonicus is a ground beetle endemic to Japan. It inhabits the southwestern Japanese forests and is most frequently observed between May and September, with peak observations occurring mid-August. C. japonicus is a univoltine species, meaning it has one brood of offspring per year. Its larvae prey exclusively on earthworms. At lower altitudes, the reproductive cycle has been shown shown to coincide with the abundance of earthworms. This demonstrates the synchronization between the life cycles of the two species. The males tend to be slightly smaller than the females with both sexes having median body sizes of 24 mm and 26 mm, respectively. However, there is a large variation in intraspecific body size due to factors other than sex. These factors include parent size, food availability, and habitat temperature.

References

  1. 1 2 Gary Poore & Marilyn Schotte (2011). Schotte M, Boyko CB, Bruce NL, Poore GC, Taiti S, Wilson GD (eds.). "Idotea balthica (Pallas, 1772)". World Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Isopod Crustaceans database. World Register of Marine Species . Retrieved January 1, 2012.
  2. "Baltic Isopod - Idotea balthica - Details - Encyclopedia of Life". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2016-03-25.
  3. 1 2 3 Kåre Telsnes. "Baltic Isopod – Idotea balthica". The Marine Flora & Fauna of Norway. Retrieved January 1, 2012.
  4. Hiscock, Keith; Tyler-Walters, Harvey, "Assessing the sensitivity of seabed species and biotopes — the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN)", Developments in Hydrobiology, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 309–320, ISBN   978-1-4020-4321-5 , retrieved 2023-04-06
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Merilaita, S.; Jormalainen, V. (2000-03-01). "Different roles of feeding and protection in diel microhabitat choice of sexes in Idotea baltica". Oecologia. 122 (4): 445–451. doi:10.1007/s004420050965. ISSN   1432-1939.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jormalainen, Veijo; Tuomi, Juha (1989-10-01). "Sexual differences in habitat selection and activity of the colour polymorphic isopod Idotea baltica". Animal Behaviour. 38 (4): 576–585. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80002-8. ISSN   0003-3472.
  7. 1 2 3 Merilaita, Sami (2001-03-01). "Habitat heterogeneity, predation and gene flow: colour polymorphism in the isopod, Idotea baltica". Evolutionary Ecology. 15 (2): 103–116. doi:10.1023/A:1013814623311. ISSN   1573-8477.
  8. Yli-Renko, Maria; Pettay, Jenni E.; Rothäusler, Eva; Vesakoski, Outi (2022-10-01). "Lack of anti-predator recognition in a marine isopod under the threat of an invasive predatory crab". Biological Invasions. 24 (10): 3189–3198. doi: 10.1007/s10530-022-02839-x . ISSN   1573-1464.
  9. Salemaa, Heikki (1978). "Geographical variability in the colour polymorphism of Idotea baltica (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic". Hereditas. 88 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1978.tb01619.x. PMID   689891.
  10. Leidenberger, Sonja; Harding, Karin; Jonsson, Per R. (2012-05-01). "Ecology and distribution of the isopod genus Idotea in the Baltic Sea: key species in a changing environment". Journal of Crustacean Biology. 32 (3): 359–389. doi: 10.1163/193724012X626485 .
  11. Salemaa, Heikki (1978). "Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic Sea". Ophelia. 27 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00785236.1987.10422007 . Retrieved April 21, 2020.
  12. Vesakoski, Outi; Merilaita, Sami; Jormalainen, Veijo (2008). "Reckless males, rational females: Dynamic trade-off between food and shelter in the marine isopod Idotea balthica". Behavioural Processes. 79 (3): 175–181. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.005. PMID   18692551. S2CID   21790503 . Retrieved April 21, 2020.
  13. Roth, Annie (28 July 2022). "Like Bees of the Seas, These Crustaceans Pollinate Seaweed". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  14. Lavaut, E.; Guillemin, M.-L.; Colin, S.; Faure, A.; Coudret, J.; Destombe, C.; Valero, M. (29 July 2022). "Pollinators of the sea: A discovery of animal-mediated fertilization in seaweed". Science. 377 (6605): 528–530. doi:10.1126/science.abo6661. PMID   35901149. S2CID   251159505.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Vesakoski, Outi; Merilaita, Sami; Jormalainen, Veijo (2008-11-01). "Reckless males, rational females: Dynamic trade-off between food and shelter in the marine isopod Idotea balthica". Behavioural Processes. 79 (3): 175–181. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.005. ISSN   0376-6357.
  16. 1 2 Merilaita, SAMI; Jormalainen, VEIJO (1997-10-01). "Evolution of sex differences in microhabitat choice and colour polymorphism inIdotea baltica". Animal Behaviour. 54 (4): 769–778. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0490. ISSN   0003-3472.
  17. 1 2 3 Franke, Heinz-Dieter; Janke, Michael (1998-09-01). "Mechanisms and consequences of intra- and interspecific interference competition in Idotea baltica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): A laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitat segregation". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 227 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00253-0. ISSN   0022-0981.
  18. Tuomi, Juha; Jormalainen, Veijo; Ilvessalo, Hannele (1988). "Growth, food consumption and reproductive tactics of the aquatic isopod Idotea baltica". Annales Zoologici Fennici. 25 (2): 145–151. ISSN   0003-455X.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Jormalainen, Veijo; Merilaita, Sami (1993). "Female Resistance and Precopulatory Guarding in the Isopod Idotea Baltica (Pallas)". Behaviour. 125 (3/4): 219–231. ISSN   0005-7959.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jormalainen, Veijo (September 1998). "Precopulatory Mate Guarding in Crustaceans: Male Competitive Strategy and Intersexual Conflict". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 73 (3): 275–304. doi:10.1086/420306. ISSN   0033-5770.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jormalainen, Veijo; Tuomi, Juha; Merilaita, Sami (1992). "Mate choice for male and female size in aquatic isopod Idotea balthica". Annales Zoologici Fennici. 29 (3): 161–167. ISSN   0003-455X.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jormalainen, Veijo; Merilaita, Sami; Härdling, Roger (2000-07-01). "Dynamics of intersexual conflict over precopulatory mate guarding in two populations of the isopod Idotea baltica". Animal Behaviour. 60 (1): 85–93. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1429. ISSN   0003-3472.
  23. Jormalainen, V.; Merilaita, S.; Riihimäki, J. (2001-09-15). "Costs of intersexual conflict in the isopod Idotea baltica: Fitness cost of intersexual conflict". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 14 (5): 763–772. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00325.x.