Irish Volunteers (18th century)

Last updated

{short description|18th century local Irish militias}}

Contents

The Dublin Volunteers on College Green by Francis Wheatley depicting the Dublin Volunteers on College Green in 1779. Francis Wheatley - The Dublin Volunteers on College Green.jpg
The Dublin Volunteers on College Green by Francis Wheatley depicting the Dublin Volunteers on College Green in 1779.

The Irish Volunteers were patriot militia formed in the Kingdom of Ireland during the American War of Independence. Massing under arms in the capital, and inspired by American example, in 1782 the Volunteers persuaded the British Crown to renounce its previously asserted right to overrule the Parliament in Dublin and to legislate for Ireland from Westminster. The movement subsequently spit over the question of whether reform of Ireland's Parliament and Vice-regal administration should encompass emancipation of the Kingdom's Roman Catholic majority, Protestants alone having a right to vote, to assume office and to carry arms. Following the onset of war in 1793 with the new French Republic, the government moved to suppress extra-parliamentary opposition and to induct Volunteers into a Crown militia. Concentrated among the Protestant "Dissenters" (Presbyterians) of the north-east, the more uncompromising elements entered into a republican conspiracy, breaking into open rebellion in 1798.

Origin and composition

In February 1778, the British Crown declared war on France which, in a treaty of mutual assistance treaty, had recognised the United States. In Belfast, Ireland's principal port in Ulster, the townspeople formed a volunteer defence company. They recalled the relative ease with which the French in 1760, during the Seven Years War, had entered Belfast Lough and seized the castle at Carrickfergus. [1] :71 When in April, the American privateer John Paul Jones sank a Royal Navy sloop sent to block his entry to the Lough recruitment surged, with the new Volunteers calling on the rest of the country to follow their example. [2] Further spurred by rumours of an invasion threat to Cork, by the end of 1779 there were some 40,000 Volunteers, organised in local companies and coalesced into county battalions and provincial regiments [3] :174 Although Lord Lieutenant released arms for their use, [4] the Volunteers were independent of his Dublin Castle administration and of the Parliament. Officers accepted their commission, not from the Crown, but through election from their Volunteer ranks. [5]

As far back as 1715 and 1745, self-constituted local defensive forces had mustered in anticipation of Stuart invasions. In the 1760s, these reassembled to help break "Whiteboy" resistance to rack-renting, tithe-collection, and enclosure. [6] Such companies or posses often comprised little more than landowners in command of, however few, Protestants they could count upon among their tenants. Where in the south there had been a recent resurgence of Whiteboy activity this remained the character of the new the Volunteer corps. [7] :378 But in the areas of greater Protestant concentration, in Cork, in Dublin city and County, and in the Presbyterian north-east (Belfast and its hinterlands in Ulster, which was to account for more than half the companies formed) [8] :8 the Volunteers mobilized the broader "Protestant tenantry of Ireland". [9] :278 This was a middle class of freehold farmers, merchants, manufacturers, and attendant professionals, whose properties, even where extensive, were commonly held on lease from an aristocracy formed, and reformed, in the Irish land settlements of the preceding century. [8] :22,394

In these companies, the "drilling and training, purchasing of uniforms and arms, drawing up articles of association, electing their officers, [and] instructing delegates" for provincial and national conventions, "contributed to greater political awareness". [7] :379 For Presbyterians, this included a consciousness of sharing, if only in part, the disabilities imposed upon the Roman Catholic majority by the landowning Anglican establishment. [10] In Belfast, this "Protestant Ascendency" was represented by the Marquess of Donegall. Like the proprietors of numerous other parliamentary boroughs in the Kingdom, the Marquess exercised an exclusive right to appoint the town's burgesses, public offices from which as "Dissenters" from the established church Presbyterians were excluded, and through the burgesses, to the "elect" those who would sit for the borough in the Irish House of Commons. [11] :55–61Few Presbyterians ever reached in Commons, and none sat among the Lords in the upper house. [12]

Opportunity to challenge the Ascendancy interest was confined to a small number of county and municipal contests were enfranchised freeholders might, in defiance of their landlords, be induced to vote for the promise of reform. Voting instead with their feet, Presbyterians had in large numbers been emigrating to the American colonies. [13] :79 [7] :374–377 Assessing their loyalty on the eve of their kinsmen's final break with the Crown, the British Viceroy, Lord Harcourt, reported them to London as being "Americans in their hearts". [14] :47

In June 1779, Spain declared war on Britain as an ally of France. In January 1780, victory over a Spanish squadron at Cape St. Vincent, restored faith the in the ability of the Royal navy to defend its home waters and the fear of invasion abated. But with all ranks recognising "parallels between the issues animating the American struggle and their own grievances", [15] Volunteering had acquired a political momentum of its own. [3] :193 [16] :198–203

"Free Trade"

Had Parliament been able to finance a militia bill enacted in March 1778, the Volunteer movement might have been stillborn. [3] :153 The difficulty was a sharp drop in excise, and other tax, revenues resulting from the war's disruption, first of Atlantic trade and then, with the entry of France and Spain, of trade with the European continent; a problem further compounded by a British decision to embargo the export of Irish provisions so as to secure supplies for its armed forces. [16] :157–161 The resulting fiscal crisis and economic distress threw into renewed relief what, in Irish eyes had long been regarded as the inequities of British commercial policy. [1] :62–66 Legislating for Ireland, the British Parliament had banned or severely restricted the Irish export of wool, glass and other goods competitive with its own producers and, through its Navigation Acts (of which Belfast's leading Volunteer, Waddell Cunningham, was serial violator) [17] had sought to direct Irish foreign and colonial trade through British ports. [3] :2 In response, the Volunteers moved down a path travelled by the Patriots in America: mounting public campaigns to highlight the economic costs of submitting to the Crown at Westminster, before advancing a radical constitutional remedy. [18]

As had American colonists before 1776, Volunteers arranged local "non-importation agreements". The signatories undertook to buy Irish and boycott British goods, with the Volunteers themselves making much of having their uniforms tailored in home-spun cloth. [18] The government of Prime Minister Lord North prepared a package of commercial concessions, but watered down by British mercantile interests these paled in comparison to the conditions extended to the Americans by the Carlisle Peace Commission. [3] :162–165 Britain, it seemed was "prepared to recompense American rebelliousness better than Irish loyalty". [19]

In November 1779, on the annual commemoration of King William III's birthday, Volunteers marched to his statue in front of Parliament on College Green. Styling themselves as "50,000 joined together, ready to die for their fatherland," they saluted "Free Trade" with volleys of shot and with cannon decked with banners threatening "Free Trade or this", "Free trade or a Speedy Revolution". [4] Ireland was be free, within the terms of her own tariff policies, to develop her manufactures and to have access to foreign and colonial trade unrestricted by rival British interests. [8] :7

In London, the North ministry, still at that point contending with the prospect of a joint French-Spanish armada, capitulated. The Crown lifted the bans on Irish exports, and granted the right to trade directly with the plantation colonies. [20] :214 [21] As an additional conciliatory gesture to the northern merchant class, the government relieved Presbyterians of the tests of Anglican conformity that excluded them from municipal corporations and other public service. [12]

The "Revolution of 1782"

A print of a painting depicting the Volunteer Dungannon Convention at Dungannon Church, on 15 February 1782 Dungannon1782.png
A print of a painting depicting the Volunteer Dungannon Convention at Dungannon Church, on 15 February 1782

See also: Constitution of 1782 § The "Revolution of 1782"

First Dungannon Convention

Neither the Patriots in Parliament nor the Volunteers were satisfied. As the British opposition, under Charles James Fox, reminded them, [8] :11 so long as Great Britain maintained her right to legislate for Ireland as a subordinate kingdom, her mercantilist restrictions on Irish industry and commerce conceded in wartime, could be as readily reversed in time of peace. [3] :186 [22] :189 At the same time, against the background of the American crisis and economic recession, the concessions wrung from the Crown had "whetted appetites" for further assertions of Irish interests and of Irish rights. [22] :171

In February 1782, delegates from 360 Volunteer companies in Ulster gathered in Dungannon [23] (central to the province, seat of the ancient Ó Néills and a meeting place for Presbyterian Synods). [24] Taking on the "the substance of a national assembly", [25] the convention delegates resolved that "the claim of any body of men, other than the King, Lords, and Commons of Ireland, to make laws to bind this kingdom, is unconstitutional, illegal and a grievance". [26] :283

Vindication of "Irish Rights"

Two months later, with Volunteer cavalry, infantry, and artillery posted on all approaches to the Parliament in Dublin, Henry Grattan, the leader of the Patriot opposition, had a "Declaration of Irish Rights" carried by acclaim in the Irish House of Commons. [27] While her crown was "inseparably annexed to the crown of Great Britain", Ireland was to be acknowledged as "a distinct kingdom, with a parliament of her own--the sole legislature thereof". [1] :171

In London, the Rockingham Ministry, shaken by further military reverses in America and new losses to the French and Spanish at sea, continued a policy of appeasement. In June 1782, the Westminster Parliament repudiated its previous declaration of Irish Dependency (1719). [28] [29] In April 1783, pressed by a renewed agitation initiated by Belfast Volunteers, and responding to the demands of Grattan's Patriot rival, Henry Flood, [8] :10–12 [26] :322 Westminster offered a further measure to remove and prevent "all doubts which have arisen, or might arise, concerning the exclusive rights of the parliament and courts of Ireland" (23 George 3 c.28: Irish Appeals Act). [30] Commonly known as the Renunciation Act, it declared that no appeal from the decision of any court in Ireland could be heard in any court in Great Britain. [30] [31] and affirmed "the rights claimed by [the people of Ireland] to be bound only by laws enacted by his Majesty and the parliament of that kingdom". [32] [33]

Defeat of reform, 1783

Provincial conventions and the "Catholic question"

Legislative independence had been won for a Parliament in which volunteering Protestants recognised they were more narrowly represented than was true for those who would have been their British counterparts at Westminster. In Ireland, the "whole panoply of 'rotten boroughs'" and "bizarre franchises" [22] :191was such that fully two thirds of the Commons were in the "pockets" either of the great landowning families (already enconsed in the Lords) or of Dublin Castle. [34] At the same time, while the they might present themselves as more representative of the "nation" than the Lords and Commons, the Volunteers could make no claim to represent the majority of the King's subjects. Roman Catholics were "five sixths of the population", and with seemingly with little at stake in the Patriot cause. [35]

In September 1783, a second Ulster convention was called in Dungannon, with delegates from 270 companies attending. [24] Under the presidency of a prominent Country Down landowner and Member of Parliament, Robert Stewart, who was hostile to the proposition, the Convention debated but ultimately rejected, motions favoring Catholic emancipation. [36] While they might "rejoice in the relaxation of the Penal Laws" against their "fellow subjects" (the Catholic Relief Acts of 1777 and 1782), Volunteers continued to hold that Catholics could not be trusted with complete liberty. [20] :202

Professions loyalty by Catholics in the wake of the permission granted to own land on the same conditions as Protestants, or to open their own schools on license from a Protestant bishop, [20] :214–217 made no impression on the Volunteers' provincial conventions in the south. No resolutions on the "Catholic question" were voted for Leinster, Munster or Connacht. All, however, were agreed with Ulster on the need for parliamentary reform. [8] :14

National Convention in Dublin and parliamentary reform

At the "Grand National Convention", called for Dublin in November, Stewart was appointed chairman of the committee "for the receiving and digesting plans of reform". [37] His advice to his friends in Parliament, and in Dublin Castle, was that the demands of Dissenters for greater representation should be met so as to dissuade them from pushing Catholic claims along with their own. [38]

The digested bill was presented in the Irish House of Commons by Henry Flood. Dressed in his Volunteer uniform, he instructed the city and county Volunteers who had processed with the Convention delegates to the Rotunda, a mile distant, [39] :287 not disband until they knew the outcome of the debate. [39] :286–288 The resulting armed muster and display, whose purpose in 1782 had been to impress Dublin Castle and the government in London, now appeared to be directed at the Parliament itself, and particular at its "undertakers", the powerful borough patrons. They had rallied to the cause of legislative independence (it cost them nothing) but were known to oppose reform. [22] :194

In the event, the bill sought only to enlarge the boundaries of the more obviously "decayed" boroughs so to achieve a modest extension of the still exclusively Protestant freehold franchise. The more consequential provision might have been its exclusion from the Commons of government office-holders. [22] :192–193 Leave to introduce the bill was nonetheless defeated, and by a margin made all the wider by the opposition of Grattan. [1] :202 In an intervention he insisted was a rebuke to the Volunteers, not a rejection of reform, Grattan joined the Attorney General, Barry Yelverton , in refusing to receive "propositions at the point of the bayonet". [39] :288

Grattan's repudiation of the "new" Volunteers

Grattan argued that while the Volunteers "rescued the constitution" in 1782, they had done so by standing "at the back of parliament", supporting the legislature in the exercise of its exclusive rights. Now, in presenting a reform bill without prior petitions to register support in the counties, and standing armed about the streets of the capital, they were attempting to "dictate" to parliament. It was, Grattan proposed, a measure of how far the Volunteers had "degenerated". [1] :202–203

Francis Dobbs, a close friend of Lord Charlemont (the "Volunteer earl"), [40] observed that while "the aristocracy" among the Volunteers are "taught by their own vanity to court democracy" (in 1782, Charlemont succeeded as Volunteer "Commander-in-Chief" in Ulster), the private Volunteer, subject only to officers he elects, is "ennobled, . . . no longer a timid slave . . . but a free subject, proud that he can own a uniform". [7] :378 As membership peaked in the winter of 1781-82 at 80,000, [5] the social barrier that had been represented by the cost of this sometimes elaborate uniform, was giving way under the force of this "new lesson in equality". [7] :378 Already in June 1778, a company had formed in the city of Derry composed entirely of tradesmen. [7] :206 By 1783, companies were being formed with cheap uniforms or, indeed, with no uniforms. [8] :16

Drawing the attention of the Commons to the "drilling the lowest classes of the populace", [26] :396 Grattan sounded an alarm: whereas "the old, the original Volunteers", whose uniform he had been proud to wear, "had become respectable because they represented the property of the nation", attempts were being made "to arm the poverty of the kingdom". Originally "the armed property", were Volunteers, he asked, to become the armed beggary? [1] :212 Similarly impressed by the changing character of the Volunteers, the Lord Lieutenant complained of "great quantities of arms ... being scattered through the very lowest section of the population". [26] :297

Robert Stewart, and the president of the Dublin convention, Lord Charlemont, advised the Volunteers to receive their rebuff quietly. [1] :202–203 In their final meeting, delegates voted an address that did no more than implore the king not to impute their "humble wish to have certain manifest perversions of parliamentary representation remedied" to "any spirit of innovation". [1] :206 Parliament, meanwhile, with Grattan's support, took the precaution of voting additional funds for the regular army, whose troops, following their defeat at Yorktown, had begun to flood back from America, and for the creation of a government-controlled militia. [1] :213

A further National Volunteer Congress was called for in October 1784, but poorly attended and divided by the commitment to a purely Protestant franchise, it broke up without resolution. [26] :402 [22] :193

Division over Catholic emancipation

Formation of "united" companies

The Lisburn and Lambeg Volunteers firing a feu de joie in honour of the Dungannon Convention, 1782. The Lisburn and Lambeg Volunteers Firing a 'Feu de Joie' in Honour of the Dungannon Convention, 1782.jpg
The Lisburn and Lambeg Volunteers firing a feu de joie in honour of the Dungannon Convention, 1782.

In the words of an early historian of the movement, Thomas MacNevin, the Volunteers "lingered some years", held annual reviews, passed addresses and resolutions, but "their proceedings were without effect". With the Convention in Dublin, the Volunteers of 1782 as a body "practically expired". [1] :215 But it was not, MacNevin suggests, before a further shift could detected in their ranks, particularly in Ulster where Volunteer numbers fell less precipitously. While the "aristocratic party" in Dublin were content with the "Constitution of 1782", northern Volunteers "had begun to perceive" that "a reformed parliament, independent of England" would never be achieved without the co-operation of Catholics. [1] :212

This was a position that had been represented in Dublin, by William Todd Jones, a captain of the Lisburn Fusilier Corps of Volunteers, and newly elected Member of Parliament. [41] In Lisburn, a town which, exceptionally, had a "potwalloper" franchise (one in which "any [Protestant] man with a pot [and] a hearth to place it on" could vote), [22] :287 Todd, on a platform of emancipation and reform, defeated the candidate of the local landlord, the Marquess of Hertford. [42] After Flood's reform scheme was again dismissed by the Commons in March 1784, Todd's proposal for a Catholic alliance found broader favour. [43]

In June 1783, delegates of 39 Volunteer corps, reviewed in Belfast, had already resolved: "That an era so honourable to the spirit, wisdom, and loyalty of Ireland, A MORE EQUAL REPRESENTATION of the People in Parliament deserves the deliberate attention of every Irishman". [14] :50 Such resolutions were now being approved in counties Antrim (where it had been reported that no company had more than seven Catholics) [8] :14 and Down. Joining Belfast, local Volunteers, began inviting to their ranks "persons of every religious persuasion". [43]

In the wake of the Catholic Relief Act of 1778, in Wexford and Waterford some Catholics, in defiance of the law which forbade them to carry arms without licence, had tried to set up their own independent companies, and as early as June 1779 a few gained entry to existing corps. [22] :181But in the wake of the humiliation that had attended the attempt to pursue reform within an exclusively Protestant Constitution, there was a conscious effort to create "united" companies. Recruitment by the Liberty corps in Dublin in the spring of 1784, may have been such as example: their exercises were boycotted by other Volunteer companies in city in protest against the new Liberty enlistees being not only "of the lowest class" but chiefly Roman Catholic. [26] :394

In Belfast the commitment was perhaps clearer: the town's First Company acted in the firm conviction that "a general Union of all the inhabitants of Ireland is necessary to the freedom and prosperity of this kingdom". The town's Blue Company followed suit, and on 30 May 1784 both companies, as token of their new united ethos, paraded before St Mary's Chapel, Belfast's first Catholic church, to mark its inaugural mass. [44] :129–131

Armagh disturbances and creation of the Orange Order

The formation of united companies in Belfast and its hinterlands in counties Down and Antrim, which helped sustain Volunteer numbers after the end of the American war, divided the movement in Ulster. While the call for Catholic emancipation might find support in Belfast and surrounding Protestant-majority districts, in the Plantation counties west of the River Bann, where a Protestant minority increasingly competed with Catholics for tenancies and employment and harboured bitter memories of the Irish Rebellion of 1641, veterans of the Volunteer movement were not as easily persuaded. [45] [46] [47]

In County Armagh, the first admission of Catholics to the ranks triggered a reorganisation of Volunteers under Lord Charlemont into new companies expressly committed to Catholic exclusion and to pan-Protestant unity. Volunteers in these companies collaborated with, and moonlighted as, Peep o' Day Boys, Protestant vigilantes who, on the pretext of searching for illegally hold arms, wrecked Catholic homes, setting their inhabitants out upon the road. The resulting "Armagh disturbances" culminated in September 1795 in the Battle of the Diamond. Peep o' Day Boys carrying, in addition to weapons provided by the local gentry, Volunteer muskets,routed a force of Catholic Defenders killing, depending on reports, between six and thirty. [48]

Gathered in Loughgall, the victors founded the Orange Order, a sworn association pledged to defend "the King and his heirs so long as he or they support the Protestant Ascendancy". [49] Meanwhile, of the 7,000 Catholics subsequently displaced from the county, some found shelter on Presbyterian farms in counties Down and Antrim organised by a new group of Volunteer veterans, the Society of United Irishmen. [50] :483,486 The "United men" were pledged to "a brotherhood of affection, an identity of interests, a communion of rights, and a union of power among Irishmen of every religious persuasion". [51]

The final years

Bastille Day, 1792, Belfast. Volunteer companies parade "the Colours of Five Free Nations, viz.: Flag of Ireland - motto, Unite and be free. Flag of America - motto, The Asylum of Liberty. Flag of France - motto, The Nation, the Law, and the King. Flag of [Constitutional] Poland - motto, We will support it. Flag of Great Britain - motto, Wisdom, Spirit, and Liberality." Bastille-day-belfast-1791.jpg
Bastille Day, 1792, Belfast. Volunteer companies parade "the Colours of Five Free Nations, viz.: Flag of Ireland – motto, Unite and be free. Flag of America – motto, The Asylum of Liberty. Flag of France – motto, The Nation, the Law, and the King. Flag of [ Constitutional] Poland – motto, We will support it. Flag of Great Britain – motto, Wisdom, Spirit, and Liberality."

Bastille Day celebrations and the United Irish

On news of revolutionary events in France, Volunteerism was given a new lease of life. In the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and Civil Constitution of the Clergy, the greatest of the Catholic powers was seen to be undergoing its own Glorious Revolution. [53] In his Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), Edmund Burke had sought to discredit any analogy with 1688 in England. But invited north by Volunteers in October 1791, Wolfe Tone, a Protestant secretary of the Catholic Committee in Dublin, found that Thomas Paine's response to Burke, the Rights of Man was already the "Koran of Belfast". [54]

Three months before, on 14 July, the second anniversary of the Fall of the Bastille was celebrated with a triumphal Volunteer procession through Belfast and a solemn Declaration to the Great and Gallant people of France: "As Irishmen, We too have a country, and we hold it very dear so dear... that we wish all Civil and Religious Intolerance annihilated in this land." [55] :52–53 There were also celebrations in Dublin and in towns across Ulster. In Randalstown, a Volunteer meeting enunciated the new revolutionary credo: [7] :279

We believe that a nation has a right to form, maintain, and perfect its constitution, and to regulate at pleasure everything relating to government. We believe a nation has an inherent right to change its constitution, and therefore we believe that the Revolution in France to be founded in the law of nature and of nations caused by tyranny and oppression, and sanctioned by dire necessity

In 1792, Bastille Day in Belfast was greeted with similar scenes and an address to the French National Assembly hailing the soldiers of the new republic as "the advance guard of the world". [56] :67 A further address To The People of Ireland gave Tone's hosts a first opportunity for a public intervention as "United Irishmen". In the public debate, a number of leading Volunteers, among them Waddell Cunningham, had proposed hedging the commitment to an equality of "all sects and denominations of Irishmen", preferring rather "the gradual emancipation of our Roman Catholic brethren". Expressing "astonishment at hearing... any part of the address called a Catholic question" the United Irish speakers had the amendment voted down on grounds that the only question was "whether Irishmen should be free". [56] :52–65

They had invited Tone to Belfast as the author of An Argument on behalf of the Catholics of Ireland, [57] a tract whose circulation in Ireland only Paine's Rights of Man was to surpass. [58] The Argument embraced what had been the most advanced Volunteer position at the Dungannon and Dublin conventions: that the key to constitutional reform was Catholic emancipation. [59] :49–50 So long as "illiberal", "bigoted" and "blind" Irish Protestants indulged their fears of "Popery" and of Catholic repossession of forfeited property, the "boobies and blockheads" in Parliament and Dublin Castle would prevail. The choice was stark: either "Reform, the Catholics, justice and liberty" or "an unconditional submission to the present, and every future administration". [57]

Catholic relief and the suppression of Voluntarism

With the support and participation of United Irishmen, [60] :74–76 in December 1792 the Catholic Committee in Dublin convened a national Catholic Convention. Conducted on a broad, head-of-household, franchise, in every Catholic parish in the Kingdom, and in "a blaze of publicity", [61] its election was a direct challenge to the legitimacy of the Irish Lords and Commons. [62] The king himself acknowledged the Convention's mandate by agreeing in January 1793 to meet a delegation at Windsor. [39] :296

In advance of war with the anti-clerical French Republic, the British government was solicitous of Catholic opinion, both at home and abroad. While it retained for Parliament itself, and for the higher state and judicial offices, the exclusionary Oath of Supremacy, in 1791 it had re-admitted Catholics to the parliamentary franchise in Great Britain. With the Irish Catholic delegates it agreed that Dublin Castle would whip the necessary votes behind Grattan to have the same measure enacted in Ireland. [39] :296 There was, however, a price for overriding Ascendancy opposition: beginning with the agreement of the Catholic Committee to dissolve itself, [63] the government insisted on end to all further extra-parliamentary opposition. [64]

The Catholic Relief Act 1793 was accompanied by a Convention Act that outlawed "the election or appointment of assemblies purporting to represent the people". [65] There was also a new Militia Act. Holding it "essential to safety and protection of this realm and its constitution" that there be "a respectable military force, under officer possessing land property within this kingdom", the preamble gave statutory expression to something of the original Volunteer ethos. [8] :18 But officers took their commission from the Crown and commanded not volunteers but Catholics (to whom the right to bear arms was restored), as well as Protestants, conscripted by lot. [66] :209

At the end of 1792, the mustering of Volunteer companies in Dublin City and County was banned by proclamation. In March 1793, Lord Lieutenant issued the same injunction for Belfast and adjacent districts. [8] :17 When Volunteers planned a review near Doagh in County Antrim in September, they had ammunition dispatched in secret a few days prior to companies with serviceable arms so that they might resist any opposition they encountered. The review was abandoned when they learned that the opposition was to be the 38th Regiment, the Fermanagh Militia, and a detachment of Artillery. [67]

Volunteers accepted paid commissions in the Militia, with some, in consequence, finding themselves in command of Catholics whose right to bear arms they had opposed. More were to favour the more exclusively Protestant Yeomanry, [68] a part-time force organised from September 1796, officered by the local gentry but paid, clothed, and armed by the government. [69]

The United Irishmen meanwhile had been driving new recruitment in an attempt to recast the Volunteerism on the lines of the revolutionary French "National Guard". [70] [71] In January 1793, the Belfast News Letter reported the Reverend Thomas Ledlie Birch, a United Irishman, leading his Presbyterian congregation in Saintfield in unanimous resolve to add 500 of their number "to the National Guards of Ireland". [72] When, in May 1794, the Dublin Castle found evidence of communication with the French Directory (implicating Tone among others), the Society of United Irishmen and their guard companies were proscribed. [66] :211

In May 1795, a Belfast conference of United societies approved new clandestine system of organisation, through which, in coordination with the Defenders, they were to move toward the ill-fated risings of the spring and summer of 1798. [73] The rebellion saw veterans of the Volunteers on either side of a struggle that contributed to the destruction of their common achievement. The Constitution of 1782 was upended by the Act of Union 1800. The Irish Parliament, in which to protest Grattan made a last appearance, dressed in his Volunteer uniform, [74] was abolished. Its still wholly Protestant representation was transferred to Westminster which proceeded to legislate for Ireland as the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Legacy

The Irish historian Thomas Bartlett suggests that the Volunteers of 1782 launched a paramilitary tradition in Irish politics, one in which, whether nationalist or unionist, "the force of argument" is "trumped by the argument of force". [75]

The Ulster Volunteers, founded in 1912 to oppose the restoration of a Irish parliament, made frequent reference to the Irish Volunteers. They shared many features such as regional strength, leadership, and a Protestant recruitment base. [76] Their nationalist counterparts, the Irish Volunteers formed in November 1913, were consciously modelled on their northern rivals, [77] but their founders, including Eoin MacNeill and Patrick Pearse, also invoked their common 18th-forebearers. [78]

Denis McCullough and Bulmer Hobson of the Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB) had established the Dungannon Clubs in 1905 "to celebrate those icons of the constitutionalist movement, the Irish Volunteers of 1782". [79] Their failing, according to MacNeill, was "not that they did not fight but that they did not maintain their organisation till their objects had been secured". [80]

Following Britain's declaration of war upon Germany in August 1914, Captain Jack White, who the year before had help form the Irish Citizen Army during the great Dublin lock-out, [81] wrote a memorandum to Lord Kitchener and Sir Ian Hamilton proposing that the Volunteers serve as an Irish home guard. In contrast to the call of the Irish Home Rule leader, John Redmond, for them to enlist for imperial service, this would have had the Volunteers paid and equipped by the British but remain, like the Volunteers of old, under their own command at home. He found his comrades no less suspicious than the government: "I was taken to be recruiting for Britain, whereas I was trying to use Britain to put Ireland into a position to enforce her own claims". [82] White was dismissed from his Volunteer commands. [83]

One of the mottos used by the Volunteer's Quis Separabit, meaning "who shall separate us", which was in use by them from at least 1781, [84] is also used by the Order of St. Patrick (founded in 1783), and is used by several Irish British Army regiments such as the Royal Dragoon Guards, Royal Ulster Rifles (previously Royal Irish Rifles), 4th Royal Irish Dragoon Guards, 88th Regiment of Foot (Connaught Rangers) and its successor the Connaught Rangers. It was also adopted by the anti-home rule organisation, the Ulster Defence Union whose principal aim was to resist the Second Home Rule Bill of 1893, and is also the motto of the paramilitary Ulster Defence Force formed in 1971 during the Northern Ireland Troubles. [85]

Organisation

The flag of the Dublin Volunteers. Flag of the Dublin Volunteers.svg
The flag of the Dublin Volunteers.

Structure

Originally each Volunteer company was an independent force typically consisting of 60 to 80 men [67] In some parts of the country, a company could consist of between 60 and 100, and were raised in each parish where the number of Protestants made it viable. Alongside the parish companies, towns had one or more companies. [86] For officers a company had as its highest rank, a captain, followed by a lieutenant, and ensign. [67] [86] They also had surgeons and chaplains. Local Volunteer companies would later amalgamate into battalions and led by colonels and generals, [67] some of which consisted of ten to twelve companies. [86]

Volunteer members accepted no pay, however the more wealthy amongst them shared their funds with their poorer comrades, with officers donating towards the company's stock purse. [67] [87]

An example of the amalgamation of Volunteer companies is that of the First Ulster Regiment, County Armagh. The First Armagh Company was raised in Armagh city on 1 December 1778, and on 13 January 1779, Lord Charlemont became its captain. As many new Volunteer corps were being raised throughout the county, a meeting was held at Clare on 27 December 1779, where they discussed forming these corps into battalions, with commanding officers appointed and the raising of artillery companies to complement them. This saw the creation of the Northern Battalion and Southern Battalion of the First Ulster Regiment. [67]

Unlike the volunteer militias formed earlier in the 18th century, which had Crown commissioned officers, the private members of Volunteer companies in a form of military democracy appointed their own, and were "subject to no Government control". These officers were subject to being dismissed for misconduct or incapacity. [67] [87]

An example of Volunteers taking action against their own officers would be two officers commissioned to the Southern Battalion of the First Ulster Regiment: Thomas Dawson (commander) and Francis Dobbs (major). Both would also accept commissions in a Fencible regiment. This met with great disapproval amongst local volunteer companies who found them no longer acceptable as field officers. Lord Charlemont's own company, the First Armagh Company, even protested against the formation of Fencible regiments. By 1 January 1783, both Dawson and Dobbs had received their Fencible commissions and ceased to be volunteers. [67]

Uniform

Of the 154 companies of Volunteers listed in The Volunteer's Companion (1784); 114 had scarlet uniforms, 18 blue, 6 green, 1 dark green, 1 white, 1 grey, 1 buff, and 12 undetailed. The details of the uniform of each corps varied depending on their choice of colouring for the facing on their uniforms, and for some the lace and buttons, amongst other pieces, for example: the Glin Royal Artillery's uniform was "Blue, faced blue; scarlet cuffs and capes; gold lace", whilst the Offerlane Blues' uniform was "Scarlet, faced blue; silver lace". [88] The Aghavoe Loyals had "scarlet, faced blue", whilst the Castledurrow Volunteers wore green uniforms faced with white and silver lining. [88] [89]

Lord Charlemont desired that all county companies should have the same uniform of scarlet coats with white facings, however, some companies had already chosen their colours, or were in existence before his involvement. Whilst information on clothing is scant, it has been suggested that most uniforms were made locally, with badges, buttons, cloth, and hats being procured from places like Belfast and Dublin. The Belfast News Letter carried advertisements from merchants offering: plated and gilt Volunteer buttons, furnished belt and pouch plates, engravings, regimental uniform cloth, and even tents. The painting of Volunteer drums and colours was also offered. [67]

Leading Volunteer and Patriot, Henry Grattan, is recorded as wearing a blue Volunteer uniform, although in Wheatley's 1780 painting The Irish House of Commons: Henry Grattan urging the Claims of Irish Right, 8 June 1780, Grattan is seen standing on the far right side of the canvas giving his speech and wearing a scarlet Volunteer uniform . [74]

Naming

The naming of some Volunteer companies may show a continuation of earlier Protestant anti-Catholic traditions, with corps named after "Protestant" victories such as Aughrim and the Boyne. [87] The name of another "Protestant" victory, Culloden, the final battle of the Jacobite rising of 1745 in Scotland, was used by a Volunteer company in Cork. [87]

Reviews

Reviews of Volunteer corps were held since the earliest days of volunteering, with county companies travelling long distances to attend ones like the Belfast Reviews. Some reviews such as those in County Armagh originally were on a smaller scale, and consisted of a few companies assembling and performing field exercises in a particular district. They later became larger affairs with brigades consisting of battalions of companies. [67]

The order of the day has been recorded for the Newry Review of 1785: most of the attending companies had marched to Newry on the Thursday, the day which Lord Charlemont also arrived. On Friday the companies that formed the First Brigade assembled and marched to the review ground, where Lord Charlemont would inspect them. His arrival was announced by the firing of nine cannons. On the Saturday, the same thing happened again this time for the Second Brigade. The review also demonstrated the attack and defence of Newry. [67]

As the period of the Volunteers drew to an end, some such as those from the County Armagh Volunteers, started considering the larger reviews as a waste of time and energy. One Volunteer, Thomas Prentice, voiced a common opinion to Lord Charlemont that they would rather instead have a few companies meet a few times during the summer for drilling and improvement. [67]

Motifs and mottos

Belt-plate of the Belfast Volunteers, featuring the British crown above a harp and the initials "B V" meaning "Belfast Volunteers" Belfast.png
Belt-plate of the Belfast Volunteers, featuring the British crown above a harp and the initials "B V" meaning "Belfast Volunteers"

The primary motif of the Volunteers was an Irish harp with the British crown mounted above it, with either the name of the company or a motto curved around it, or both, i.e. "Templepatrick Infantry" or "Liberty & Our Country". This harp and crown motif was prevalent on the Volunteer companies flags, belt-plates and gorgets. Some included the Royal cypher "G.R." standing for King George III. Shamrocks also commonly featured. [90]

Other mottos included amongst variations: For Our King & Country, Pro Rege et Patria (for King and Country), Quis Separabit (none shall separate), and Pro Patria (for Country) [90] Another Volunteer motto is the oft-repeated Pro Aeris et Focis (for our altars and our hearths), a truncated form of Pro Caesare, Pro Aeris et Focis (for our King, out altars, and out hearths), which was also used. [90] [91]

Relics

The bowl that was used as the pledging-cup of the Volunteers at the first convention was rediscovered in the 1930s in County Tyrone. This bowl was tub-shaped, resembling an Irish mether, and had the original owner's (John Bell) crest and initials engraved on the inside, as well as on the wooden base of it. Decorating this pledging-cup was three silver hoops bearing nine toasts, each of which was numbered as follows: 1. The King, 2. The Queen, 3. The Royal Family, 4. The Memory of St. Patrick, 5. The Sons of St. Patrick, 6. The Daughters of St. Patrick, 7. The Irish Volunteers, 8. The Friends of Ireland, 9. A Free Trade.

An obelisk commemorating the Dungannon Convention of 1782, was erected that year by Sir Capel Molyneux, on a hill a few miles northeast of Armagh city. On it is the following inscription: "This obelisk was erected by the Right Hon. Sir Capel Molyneux, of Castle Dillon, Bart., in the year 1782, to commemorate the glorious revolution which took place in favour of the constitution of the kingdom, under the auspices of the Volunteers of Ireland."

Competitions and awards

Drawing of the medal awarded to the First Magherafelt Volunteers for skill with broadsword. First Magherafelt Volunteers.png
Drawing of the medal awarded to the First Magherafelt Volunteers for skill with broadsword.

Competitions were held between Volunteer corps, with medals given out as marks of distinction for the best marksmen, swordsmen, as well as for the most efficient soldiers. The members of Volunteer corps from the province of Ulster, more specifically from the counties of Antrim, Armagh, Down, Londonderry, and Tyrone featured quite prominently and took an honourable place. [90] Examples of marksmen competitions included best shot with ball and best target shot at 100 yards. [90] [86] Rewards of merit were also given. [90]

Belfast 1st Volunteer Company

The Belfast 1st Volunteer Company was reputedly the first Volunteer to form on 17 March 1778. [1] :71–73 According to The Volunteers Companion, printed in 1784, it was joined in Belfast by four further Volunteer companies. [88] Delegates from 1st Company to the national convention of 1782 were "bitterly disappointed" that their fellow Volunteers were still opposed to giving Catholics the vote. [92] In 1783 they became the first company of Volunteers in Ireland to "defiantly" admit Catholics into their ranks [92] In May 1784, under the command of their principal patron, the wealthy Atlantic trader, Waddell Cunningham, paraded for the opening for the town's first Catholic chapel, St Mary's, for which they had made "a handsome collection". [92]

When the borough proprietor, Lord Donegall, ignored a petition to nominate Cunningham as one of Belfast's two Members of Parliament in the general election of 1783, Cunningham stood on a platform of parliamentary reform in neighbouring Carrickfergus. He was returned by 474 votes to 289. [17] A rare victory for a Presbyterian, the result was overturned by a committee of the House of Commons on the grounds that Belfast Volunteers had exercised undue influence on his behalf. [93] [94] His reputation as champion of liberty and reform was compromised when, in 1785, he proposed plans for a "Belfast Slave Ship Company". [95] While Belfast's prosperity was heavily invested provisioning the West-Indian plantations, the protests in the town were overwhelming. [96]

In 1792, Cunningham was again rebuffed at the Bastille Day Volunteer parade and review (where, among other displays, a portrait of Mirabeau was carried with the motto, "Can the African Slave Trade, though morally wrong, be politically right). [97] Among the Volunteers voting down his resolution for "gradual", as opposed immediate, Catholic emancipation were United Irish members of the Green Company. [98] Wolfe Tone, elected as an honorary member of the Green Company, who he also calls the First Company, [99] suggesting that, renamed or reorganised as the Green Company, the Belfast 1st Volunteer had as a body moved on from Cunningham's more temporising politic, and that some were already setting on path toward a more direct confrontation with Parliament and with the Crown.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Thomas, MacNevin (1845). The History of the Volunteers of 1782. Dublin: James Duffy.
  2. Moriarty, Thomas F. (1966). O'Connell, Maurice R. (ed.). "Ireland and the American Revolution". The Review of Politics. 28 (3): 397–399. ISSN   0034-6705.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Powell, Martyn J. (2003). Britain and Ireland in the Eighteenth-Century Crisis of Empire. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-0333994023
  4. 1 2 Dickson, David (1987). New Foundations: Ireland 1660-1800. Dublin: Helicon. p. 164. ISBN   9780861670666.
  5. 1 2 Nolan, Ruairi (2024). "The Irish Volunteers of the Eighteenth Century: Successfully Importing the Gun into Irish politics. – The Irish Story" . Retrieved 30 August 2025.
  6. Padraig O Snodaigh; THE IRISH VOLUNTEERS 1715–1793 – A list of the units, pg 88. Irish Academic Press, Dublin.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 McBride, Ian (2009). Eighteenth Century Ireland. Dublin: Gill Books. ISBN   9780717116270.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Smyth, Peter (1974). "Introduction". The Volunteers, 1778-84, Education Facsimiles 141-160. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland. ISBN   0337231222.
  9. O'Connell, Maurice R. (24 November 2010). Irish Politics and Social Conflict in the Age of the American Revolution. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN   978-0-8122-0097-3.
  10. Whan, Robert (2021), Costello, Kevin; Howlin, Niamh (eds.), "Irish Presbyterians and the Quest for Toleration, c. 1692–1733", Law and Religion in Ireland, 1700-1970, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 157–183, ISBN   978-3-030-74372-7 , retrieved 3 September 2025
  11. Cochrane, Feargal (2023). Belfast, the Story of a City and its People. London: Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-26444-9.
  12. 1 2 Hayton, D. W. (2004), "Exclusion, conformity and parliamentary representation: the impact of the sacramental test on Irish dissenting politics", Ruling Ireland, 1685-1742: Politics, Politicians and Parties, Boydell and Brewer, pp. 186–208, ISBN   978-1-84615-148-4 , retrieved 3 September 2025
  13. Courtney, Roger (2013). Dissenting Voices: Rediscovering the Irish Progressive Presbyterian Tradition. Belfast: Ulster Historical Foundation. ISBN   978-1909556065.
  14. 1 2 Bardon, Jonathan (1982). Belfast: An Illustrated History. Belfast: Blackstaff Press. ISBN   0856402729 . Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  15. Alpaugh, Micah, ed. (2021), "The Irish Volunteers and Militant Reform", Friends of Freedom: The Rise of Social Movements in the Age of Atlantic Revolutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–143, ISBN   978-1-316-51561-7
  16. 1 2 Morley, Vincent (2002). Irish Opinion and the American Revolution, 1760–1783. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780511495946
  17. 1 2 Woods, C. J,. (2009). "Cunningham, Waddell | Dictionary of Irish Biography". www.dib.ie. Retrieved 21 June 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. 1 2 Dziennik, Matthew P. (12 May 2014). "Ireland and the American Revolution". Journal of the American Revolution. Retrieved 29 August 2025.
  19. Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo (2022). A ’Sudden Outcry’ for Free Trade: Autonomy, Empire and Political Economy in the Irish Free Trade Campaign, 1779-1785 (PDF). Lyon: Hal Open Science, HAL Id: hal-03586046. p. 6.
  20. 1 2 3 Bardon, Jonathan (1992). A History of Ulster. Belfast: Blackstaff Press. ISBN   0856404764.
  21. U.K., Parliament (2025). "Meeting Ireland's Terms". www.parliament.uk. Retrieved 20 August 2025.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Barlett, Thomas (2011). Ireland, a History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9781107422346.
  23. Paterson, T. G. F.; A Relic of 1782, Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Third Series, Vol. 3 (1940)
  24. 1 2 W. T. Latimer; Church of the Volunteers, Dungannon, Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Second Series, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Sep. 1894).
  25. Brendan Clifford (1974), "Notes on the political framework of Ireland 1780-1800", Belfast Politics by Henry Joy, United Irish Reprints: no. 4, B&ICO, Belfast, p. 82
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lecky, W. E. H. (1913). A history of Ireland in the eighteenth century. Vol. 2. London: Longman Green & Co. p. 322. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
  27. O'Brien, R. Barry (1896). Ireland. London: Fisher Unwin. p. 217.
  28. Costin, W. C.; Watson, J. Steven, eds. (1952). The Law and Working of the Constitution: Documents 1660–1914. Vol. I (1660–1783). London: A. & C. Black. p. 147.
  29. Williams, Hywel (2005). Cassell's Chronology of World History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp.  334–335. ISBN   0-304-35730-8.
  30. 1 2 "1783: 23 George 3 c.28: Irish Appeals Act". The Statutes Project. 20 May 2017. Retrieved 20 August 2025.
  31. Lyall, Andrew (1993–1995). "The Irish House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1783–1800". Irish Jurist. 28–30: 314–360. JSTOR   44026395.
  32. "1783: 23 George 3 c.28: Irish Appeals Act". The Statutes Project. 20 May 2017. Retrieved 20 August 2025.
  33. Lyall, Andrew (1993–1995). "The Irish House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1783–1800". Irish Jurist. 28–30: 314–360. JSTOR   44026395.
  34. Kennedy, Denis (1992). "The Irish Opposition, Parliamentary Reform and Public Opinion, 1793–1794". Eighteenth-Century Ireland / Iris an dá chultúr. 7: (95–114) 96–97. doi:10.3828/eci.1992.7. ISSN   0790-7915. JSTOR   30070925. S2CID   256154966.
  35. Macaulay, Lord (1864). The History of England from the Accession of James II. London: Longman, Green & Co. pp. IV 231–232, III 287.
  36. Hamilton, John Andrew (1898). "Stewart, Robert, first Marquis of Londonderry". In Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 54. London: Smith, Elder, & Co. pp. 345–346. OCLC 8544105.
  37. Hyde (1933), p. 22
  38. Hinde, Wendy (1981). Castlereagh. London: Collins. pp. 32–33. ISBN   000216308X.
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 Bardon, Jonathan (2008). A History of Ireland in 250 Episodes. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. ISBN   9780717146499.
  40. Best, Barbara (2013). "Francis Dobbs and the Acton Volunteers" (PDF). Poyntzpass and District Historical Society (12): 16.
  41. Woods, C. J. (2009). "Jones, William Todd | Dictionary of Irish Biography". www.dib.ie. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  42. Kelly, James (1988). "The Parliamentary Reform Movement of the 1780s and the Catholic Question" . Archivium Hibernicum. 43: (95–117) 99. doi:10.2307/25487483. ISSN   0044-8745. JSTOR   25487483. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
  43. 1 2 Rogers, Patrick (1995). "A Protestant Pioneer of Catholic Emancipation". lisburn.com. Retrieved 24 August 2025.
  44. Stewart, A. T. Q. (1993). A Deeper Silence: The Hidden Origins of the United Irishmen. Faber and Faber. pp. 49–50. ISBN   0-571-15486-7.
  45. Stewart, A. T. Q. (1977). The Narrow Ground: Aspects of Ulster 1609–1969. London: Faber & Faber. pp. 107–108.
  46. Bardon, Jonathan (2011). The Plantation of Ulster. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. pp. 333–334. ISBN   978-0-7171-4738-0.
  47. Elliott, Marianne (2003), "Religious polarization and sectarianism in the Ulster rebellion", in Thomas Bartlett et al. (eds.), 1798: A Bicentenary Perspective, Dublin, Four Courts Press, ISBN   1-85182-430-8, pp. 279–297.
  48. Tohall, Patrick (1958). "The Diamond Fight of 1795 and the Resultant Expulsions". Seanchas Ardmhacha: Journal of the Armagh Diocesan Historical Society. 3 (1): 17–50. doi:10.2307/29740669. ISSN   0488-0196.
  49. Smyth, Jim (1995). "The Men of No Popery: the Origins of the Orange Order". History Ireland. Retrieved 30 August 2021.
  50. Curtin, Nancy J. (1985). "The Transformation of the Society of United Irishmen into a Mass-Based Revolutionary Organisation, 1794-6". Irish Historical Studies. 24 (96): 463–492. doi:10.1017/S0021121400034477. ISSN   0021-1214. JSTOR   30008756. S2CID   148429477.
  51. William Bruce and Henry Joy, ed. (1794). Belfast politics: or, A collection of the debates, resolutions, and other proceedings of that town in the years 1792, and 1793. Belfast: H. Joy & Co. p. 145.
  52. Madden, Richard (1843). The United Irishmen, Their Lives and Times (30 May 2020 ed.). Belfast: J. Madden & Company. p. 179.
  53. Crawford, W. H. (1993). "The Belfast middles classes in the late 18th Century". In Dickson, David; Keogh, Dáire; Whelan, Kevin (eds.). The United Irishmen: republicanism, radicalism, and rebellion. Dublin: Lilliput Press. p. 70. ISBN   978-1-874675-19-8.
  54. Donnelly, James S. (1980). "Propagating the Cause of the United Irishmen". Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review. 69 (273): (5–23) 8. ISSN   0039-3495. JSTOR   30090237.
  55. Bardon, Jonathan (1982). Belfast: An Illustrated History. Belfast: Blackstaff Press. ISBN   0-85640-272-9 . Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  56. 1 2 William Bruce and Henry Joy, ed. (1794). Belfast politics: or, A collection of the debates, resolutions, and other proceedings of that town in the years 1792, and 1793. Belfast: H. Joy & Co.
  57. 1 2 Theobald Wolfe Tone (1791). An Argument on behalf of the Catholics of Ireland. Belfast: H. Joy & Co. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  58. Dickson, David (1999). Wolfe Tone (1763-1798), Trinity Monday Discourse, 17 May (PDF). Trinity College. p. 7.
  59. Kee, Robert (1976). The Most Distressful Country, The Green Flag, Volume 1. London: Quartet Books. ISBN   070433089X.
  60. Smyth, Jim (1998). The Men of No Property: Irish Radicals and Popular Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN   978-0-333-73256-4.
  61. Elliott, Marianne (1993), "The Defenders in Ulster", in David Dickson, Daire Keogh and Kevin Whelan eds., The United Irishment, Republicanism, Radicalism and Rebellion, (pp. 222-233), Dublin: Lilliput Press, ISBN   0-946640-95-5, pp. 227-228
  62. Woods, C. J. (2003). "The Personnel of the Catholic Convention, 1792–3" . Archivium Hibernicum. 57: 26–76 [26–27]. doi:10.2307/25484204. ISSN   0044-8745. JSTOR   25484204.
  63. Lee, Sidney, ed. (1899). "Tone, Theobald Wolfe"  . Dictionary of National Biography . Vol. 57. London: Smith, Elder & Co. p. 23.
  64. Connolly, S. J. (2007). Oxford Companion to Irish History. Oxford University Press. p. 611. ISBN   978-0-19-923483-7.
  65. "Convention (Ireland) Act Repeal Bill—Bill 4 - Hansard - UK Parliament". hansard.parliament.uk. Retrieved 22 August 2025.
  66. 1 2 Bartlett, Thomas (2010). Ireland, a History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521197205.
  67. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Paterson, T. G. F.; The County Armagh Volunteers of 1778–1793, Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Third Series, Vol. 4 (1941)
  68. Thomas Camac, Robert Day and William Cathcart; The Ulster Volunteers of 1782: Their Medals, Badges, Flags, &c. (Continued), Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Second Series, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan. 1900).
  69. Blackstock, Alan (1996). "A Forgotten Army; The Irish Yeomanry – History Ireland". historyireland.com. Retrieved 1 September 2025.
  70. Blackstock, Allan (2000). Double Traitors?: The Belfast Volunteers and Yeomen, 1778–1828. Belfast: Ulster Historical Foundation. pp. 11–12. ISBN   978-0-9539604-1-5.
  71. Garnham, Neal (2012). The Militia in Eighteenth-century Ireland: In Defence of the Protestant Interest. Boydell Press. p. 152. ISBN   978-1-84383-724-4.
  72. McClelland, Aiken (1964). "Thomas Ledlie Birch, United Irishman" (PDF). Belfast Natural History and Philosophical Society (Sessions 161/62-1963/64). Second Series, 7. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  73. Curtin, Nancy J. (1993), "United Irish organisation in Ulster, 1795–8", in D. Dickson, D. Keogh and K. Whelan, The United Irishmen: Republicanism, Radicalism and Rebellion, Dublin: Lilliput Press, ISBN   0-946640-95-5, pp. 209–222.
  74. 1 2 "Act of Union". Queen's University Belfast. Archived from the original on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
  75. Bartlett, Thomas (2010). Ireland: A History. Cambridge University Press. p. 190. ISBN   978-0-521-19720-5.
  76. Timothy Bowman (May 2012). Carson's Army, The Ulster Volunteer Force. 1910–22. Manchester University Press. pp. 16, 68. ISBN   978-0-7190-7372-4.
  77. Jackson, Alvin; Home Rule – An Irish History 1800–2000, page 120. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003. ISBN   1-84212-724-1. Quote: The UVF was a direct inspiration for the Irish Volunteers, formed in November 1913 by those on the nationalist side who feared that Home Rule had stalled.
  78. Kelly, M. J. (2006). The Fenian ideal and Irish nationalism, 1882–1916. Volume 4 of Irish historical monographs series. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. pp. 213–214. ISBN   978-1-84383-204-1 . Retrieved 3 February 2014.
  79. Charles Townshend, Easter 1916, The Irish Rebellion (2006), p18
  80. Townshend, Charles (1983). Political violence in Ireland: government and resistance since 1848. Oxford Historical Monographs. Clarendon Press. p. 295. ISBN   978-0-19-821753-4 . Retrieved 14 January 2010.
  81. Nevin, Donal (2006). James Connolly. 'A Full Life'. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. pp. 552–553. ISBN   9780717129621.
  82. White, Jack; White, James Robert; White, J. R. (2005). Misfit: An Autobiography. Livewire Publications. p. 211. ISBN   978-1-905225-20-0.
  83. McGarry, Fearghal (2009). "White, James Robert ('Jack') | Dictionary of Irish Biography". www.dib.ie. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  84. Day, Robert; On Three Gold Medals of the Irish Volunteers, The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, Fifth Series, Vol. 10, No.4 (31 December 1900).
  85. Cowan, Rosie (28 September 2002). "The rise and fall of Johnny Adair | UK news". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 25 October 2010.
  86. 1 2 3 4 Maitland, W. H.; History of Magherafelt, page 13. Moyola Books, 1916, republished 1988. ISBN   0-9511836-2-1
  87. 1 2 3 4 Thomas Bartlett (2010). Ireland: a History. Cambridge University Press. p. 179-. ISBN   978-1-107-42234-6.
  88. 1 2 3 Bigger, Francis Joseph; The National Volunteers of Ireland, 1782, Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Second Series, Vol. 15, No. 2/3 (May 1909)
  89. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown: Miscellaneous works of the Right Honourable Henry Grattan, 1822
  90. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Day, Robert; The Ulster Volunteers of '82: Their Medals, Badges, &c., Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Second Series, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Jan. 1898).
  91. Biggar, Francis Joseph; The Ulster Volunteers of '82: Their Medals, Badges, &c. Gillball Volunteers, Ulster Journal of Archaeology, Second Series, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Oct. 1898).
  92. 1 2 3 Bardon, Jonathan; A History of Ulster, page 217–220. The Black Staff Press, 2005. ISBN   0-85640-764-X
  93. Crawford, W.H. (1993), "The Belfast Middle Classes in the Late Eighteenth Century", in David Dickson, Daire Keogh, Kevin Whelan (eds.) The United Irishmen: Republicanism, Radicalism and Rebellion, Lilliput Press, ISBN 978-1874675198 (pp.62-73), p. 70
  94. Connolly, Sean J. (2012). Belfast 400: People, Place and History. Liverpool University Press. pp. 182–183. ISBN   978-1-84631-634-0.
  95. "Man who kept city on right side of slavery - BelfastTelegraph.co.uk". Belfasttelegraph.
  96. O'Regan, Raymond (2010). Hidden Belfast. Dublin: Mercier. pp. 139–142. ISBN   9781856356831.
  97. Owen, D. J. (1921). History of Belfast. Belfast: W & G Baird. p. 124.
  98. Welsh, Frank (2002). The Four Nations: A History of the United Kingdom. Yale University Press. p. 228. ISBN   0-300-09374-8 . Retrieved 7 December 2016.
  99. "Autobiography of Theobald Wolfe Tone". The New Monthly Magazine . XI: 346–7. 1824. Retrieved 7 December 2016.

Sources

See also