Leeds | |
---|---|
Former borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | West Riding of Yorkshire |
Major settlements | Leeds |
1832–1885 | |
Seats | 1832–1868: Two 1865–1885: Three |
Created from | Yorkshire |
Replaced by | Leeds Central Leeds East Leeds North Leeds South Leeds West |
Leeds was a parliamentary borough covering the town of Leeds, in the West Riding of Yorkshire, England. It was represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1832 to 1885.
The borough returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) until 1868, and then three MPs from 1868 until the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 split the borough into five divisions at the 1885 general election.
Until the 1832 United Kingdom general election the major town of Leeds was represented in Parliament solely as a part of the county constituency of Yorkshire. The only exceptions had been that the town was represented as a single member borough in the First and Second Protectorate Parliaments from 1654 to 1658.
Before 1832 no new English Parliamentary borough had been enfranchised since the 1670s, but Leeds came close to being represented from 1826. Stooks Smith, in The Parliaments of England, explained what happened.
Immediately after the Parliament elected in 1818 had assembled in 1819, a petition was presented to the House of Commons, complaining in the usual terms, that gross bribery and corruption had been practised in the return of the two Members for the Borough of Grampound, in Cornwall. In the course of the Session the matter was minutely investigated and the alleged guilt incontrovertibly proved. The course of procedure in such cases was to pass an act disfranchising the place convicted, and transferring the right so abused and forfeited, to some other body of Electors. It devolved upon Lord John Russell, who had conducted the proceedings in the House of Commons ... to originate a Bill for the above purpose. On the meeting of the New Parliament, April 28th, Lord J. Russell gave notice that he should bring in his proposed bill for disfranchising Grampound and transferring the privilege to Leeds. The Bill was ... framed to extend the right of voting to all Householders rated at or over £5 per annum, which it was estimated would constitute a body of, at least 8,000 Electors for the Borough. When the ... measure came under discussion ... Mr Beaumont ... suggested that the County of York should be divided into two Counties, one consisting of the West Riding and the other of the North and East Ridings combined; and, that instead of giving two representatives to Leeds, they should be granted to either of these divisions - Mr Wynn ... objected ... but was the first to recommend that the two new Members be transferred to the County of York, in addition to the two it already returned. ... The Legislature ... assembled in January 1821 ... Mr Beaumont renewed his objection ... upon which a division took place. The numbers were, for the amendment 66, against it 126, leaving a majority of 60 in favour of the measure peoposed by Lord John Russell. The Bill, as introduced this session, so far deviated from that of the previous year as to confer the Elective franchise upon the Mayor and Corporation of Leeds, and all Householders within the Borough, assessed at not less than Ten Pounds instead of Five Pounds per annum to the poor and parish rates. This provision, it was found on examination, would still have thrown the right of returning members, chiefly into the hands of the inferior classes, and necessarily have fostered those impure and unprincipled practices, notoriously prevalent in places similarly privileged. Mr J.A.S. Wortley to remedy this defect, moved ... that the qualification should be limited to Householders rated at not less than Twenty Pounds per annum ... in its amended form the Bill passed the House of Commons.
The House of Lords amended the bill, as Mr Wynn had originally proposed, so Leeds had to wait until 1832 for enfranchisement.
Yorkshire was the largest of the historic counties of England. Between 1826 and 1832 the undivided county returned four Members of Parliament to the House of Commons, instead of the traditional two knights of the shire which the county had sent before then and all other English counties elected up until 1832.
The Reform Act 1832 divided Yorkshire into three county constituencies, which each returned two members. The divisions were based on the three ridings, which were traditional sub-divisions of Yorkshire. Leeds was part of the West Riding of Yorkshire and thus fell within that Riding constituency.
Charles Seymour, in Electoral Reform in England and Wales, commented about the debate in 1832 about the non resident freeholder vote. This was a particularly important issue for the West Riding because the major towns of Bradford, Leeds and Sheffield and the important ones of Halifax, Huddersfield and Wakefield were all to become new Parliamentary boroughs in 1832.
Though the general principle of the freeholder franchise was accepted without debate, one aspect of the question gave rise to much discussion at the time ... . The bill provided that the freeholders in boroughs who did not occupy their property should vote in the counties in which the borough was situated. This clause drew forth a torrent of complaint, especially from the Conservatives. Peel pointed out that it would be far simpler for the freeholders in the represented boroughs to vote in the borough where their property was situate instead of being forced to travel to the county polling place; moreover if the borough freeholders were allowed to vote in the counties he felt that the boroughs would have an unfair influence in county elections and the rural element would be submerged by the urban.
... Althorp ... pointed out that until 1832 freeholders in the unrepresented towns always had voted in the counties, so the Tories could hardly complain that the ministers were introducing new principles to favour urban interests ... .
Stooks Smith records the number of electors in the Leeds polling district of the West Riding of Yorkshire constituency, at a by-election in 1835, as 2,250 (out of a total electorate of 18,063). Although it is not known if all these Leeds area voters were qualified as non-resident freeholders in the borough, the numbers given for this and other polling districts named after Parliamentary boroughs suggest that up to two-thirds of the county voters in the West Riding might have qualified on that basis.
The remainder of this article deals with the borough representation only, which is its focus.
In addition to the county constituency changes, the Representation of the People Act 1832 enfranchised the town as a new two member Parliamentary borough. The Parliamentary Boundaries Act 1832 defined that borough as comprising the parish of Leeds.
Lord John Russell, who was the member of the Whig government most involved in taking the reform legislation through Parliament in 1832, still favoured a more extensive franchise than Tory Party spokesmen - just as had been the case more than a decade earlier. However, Russell now had a House of Commons more favourable to his point of view.
A uniform borough franchise was introduced, on top of the various ancient right franchises found in the old Parliamentary boroughs: (see the Unreformed House of Commons for a list of the different franchises in each borough). The new boroughs, like Leeds, had no ancient right borough voters so only the new franchise rules applied to them. Seymour explains that:-
Only one class of new rights was created by the act of 1832. This was the £10 occupation qualification. According to the act, the franchise was granted to all male persons who for a year before registration had occupied as owner or tenants "any house, warehouse, country house, shop or other building, either separately or jointly with any land" of a clear yearly value of £10. The land must be within the electoral limits of the borough; and in order to qualify, the occupier must have been rated in respect of such premises, to all rates for the relief of the poor; and he must have paid at the time of registration all rates and taxes due from him the preceding April.
This occupation franchise was the characteristic of the borough franchise after 1832. As ownership furnished the ordinary qualification for franchise in the counties, so in the boroughs, occupation, actual or constructive, was the basis of the suffrage. While however, in the counties no provision was made for ascertaining the true value or bona fide rent which was to qualify for the franchise; in the boroughs, assessment to the taxes was embodied with the condition of value, and actual payment was super-added. There was another difference between the character of the county and borough franchises, as determined by the Reform Act. In the latter no claimant could be registered as a voter if he had received parochial relief within the past twelve months; in the counties, no disqualification was attached to the receipt of poor-relief. ...
Under the Representation of the People Act 1867 Leeds was given a third seat, but the individual electors could only cast a maximum of two votes. This limited vote provision was designed to promote minority representation in the larger constituencies, which were mostly major cities. These provisions took effect from the 1868 United Kingdom general election.
Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 single member constituencies became the norm. Leeds was divided into five such seats: Leeds Central, Leeds East, Leeds North, Leeds South and Leeds West. The new constituencies were first used for the 1885 United Kingdom general election.
Election | First member | First party | |
---|---|---|---|
1654 | Adam Baynes | ||
1656 | Adam Baynes | ||
Election | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1832 | John Marshall | Whig [1] | Thomas Babington Macaulay | Whig [1] | ||
1834 by-election | Edward Baines | Whig [1] [2] [3] | ||||
1835 | Sir John Beckett | Conservative [1] | ||||
1837 | Sir William Molesworth | Radical [1] [4] [5] [6] [7] | ||||
1841 | William Beckett | Conservative [1] | William Aldam | Whig [1] [8] [9] | ||
1847 | James Garth Marshall | Whig [10] [11] [12] | ||||
1852 | Matthew Talbot Baines | Whig [13] [14] [15] [16] | Sir George Goodman | Whig [17] [18] | ||
March 1857 | Robert Hall | Conservative | ||||
June 1857 by-election | George Skirrow Beecroft | Conservative | ||||
1859 | Edward Baines (junior) | Liberal | ||||
1868 | Representation increased to three members |
Election | First member | First party | Second member | Second party | Third member | Third party | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1868 | Edward Baines (junior) | Liberal | Robert Meek Carter | Liberal | William St James Wheelhouse | Conservative | |||
1874 | Robert Tennant | Conservative | |||||||
1876 by-election | John Barran | Liberal | |||||||
Apr 1880 | William Ewart Gladstone [19] | Liberal | William Jackson | Conservative | |||||
May 1880 by-election | Herbert Gladstone | Liberal | |||||||
1885 | Constituency divided: see Leeds Central, Leeds East, Leeds North, Leeds South and Leeds West |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Marshall | 2,012 | 36.0 | ||
Whig | Thomas Babington Macaulay | 1,984 | 35.5 | ||
Tory | Michael Thomas Sadler | 1,596 | 28.5 | ||
Majority | 388 | 7.0 | |||
Turnout | 3,548 | 85.1 | |||
Registered electors | 4,171 | ||||
Whig win (new seat) | |||||
Whig win (new seat) |
Macaulay resigned after being appointed as a member of the Council of India, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Baines | 1,951 | 50.1 | −21.4 | |
Tory | John Beckett | 1,917 | 49.3 | +20.8 | |
Radical | Joshua Bower | 24 | 0.6 | N/A | |
Majority | 34 | 0.8 | −6.2 | ||
Turnout | 3,892 | 76.9 | −8.2 | ||
Registered electors | 5,062 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | −21.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Beckett | 1,941 | 35.9 | +7.4 | |
Whig | Edward Baines | 1,803 | 33.3 | −2.7 | |
Whig | William Brougham | 1,665 | 30.8 | −4.7 | |
Conservative | John Plumbe Tempest [21] | 4 | 0.1 | N/A | |
Turnout | 3,633 | 76.1 | −9.0 | ||
Registered electors | 4,774 | ||||
Majority | 276 | 5.1 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +7.4 | |||
Majority | 1,799 | 33.2 | +26.2 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −3.2 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Edward Baines | 2,028 | 35.8 | −28.3 | |
Radical | William Molesworth | 1,880 | 33.2 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Beckett | 1,759 | 31.0 | −5.0 | |
Turnout | 3,719 | 66.7 | −9.4 | ||
Registered electors | 5,579 | ||||
Majority | 148 | 2.6 | −30.6 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −11.7 | |||
Majority | 121 | 2.2 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Beckett | 2,076 | 25.7 | +10.2 | |
Whig | William Aldam | 2,043 | 25.3 | −10.5 | |
Radical | Joseph Hume | 2,033 | 25.2 | −8.0 | |
Conservative | Robert Jocelyn | 1,926 | 23.8 | +8.3 | |
Turnout | 4,092 | 64.8 | −1.9 | ||
Registered electors | 6,316 | ||||
Majority | 43 | 0.5 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +7.1 | |||
Majority | 10 | 0.1 | −2.5 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −9.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Beckett | 2,529 | 37.9 | −11.6 | |
Whig | James Garth Marshall | 2,172 | 32.5 | +7.2 | |
Radical | Joseph Sturge [22] | 1,978 | 29.6 | +4.4 | |
Turnout | 3,340 (est) | 53.0 (est) | −11.8 | ||
Registered electors | 6,300 | ||||
Majority | 357 | 5.4 | +4.9 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −6.9 | |||
Majority | 194 | 2.9 | +2.8 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | +2.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Goodman | 2,344 | 34.1 | +1.6 | |
Whig | Matthew Talbot Baines | 2,311 | 33.6 | +4.0 | |
Conservative | Robert Hall | 1,132 | 16.5 | −2.5 | |
Conservative | Thomas Sidney | 1,089 | 15.8 | −3.2 | |
Majority | 1,179 | 17.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,438 (est) | 53.7 (est) | +0.7 | ||
Registered electors | 6,406 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +2.2 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +3.4 |
Baines was appointed president of the Poor Law Board, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Talbot Baines | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Baines was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Talbot Baines | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Goodman | 2,329 | 34.7 | +0.6 | |
Conservative | Robert Hall | 2,237 | 33.3 | +1.0 | |
Radical | John Remington Mills [23] [24] | 2,143 | 31.9 | −1.7 | |
Turnout | 4,473 (est) | 72.1 (est) | +18.4 | ||
Registered electors | 6,204 | ||||
Majority | 92 | 1.4 | −15.7 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | +0.1 | |||
Majority | 94 | 1.4 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +0.4 |
Hall's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Skirrow Beecroft | 2,070 | 50.1 | +16.8 | |
Radical | John Remington Mills | 2,064 | 49.9 | +18.0 | |
Majority | 6 | 0.2 | −1.2 | ||
Turnout | 4,134 | 66.6 | −5.5 | ||
Registered electors | 6,204 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Baines | 2,343 | 33.8 | −0.9 | |
Conservative | George Skirrow Beecroft | 2,302 | 33.2 | −0.1 | |
Liberal | William Edward Forster | 2,280 | 32.9 | +1.0 | |
Turnout | 4,614 (est) | 77.6 (est) | +5.5 | ||
Registered electors | 6,204 | ||||
Majority | 41 | 0.6 | −0.8 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −0.4 | |||
Majority | 22 | 0.3 | −1.1 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Skirrow Beecroft | 3,223 | 35.1 | +1.9 | |
Liberal | Edward Baines | 3,045 | 33.2 | −0.6 | |
Liberal | John Russell | 2,902 | 31.6 | −1.3 | |
Turnout | 6,197 (est) | 85.9 (est) | +8.3 | ||
Registered electors | 7,217 | ||||
Majority | 178 | 1.9 | +1.6 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.1 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −0.8 |
Seat increased to three members
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Baines | 15,941 | 30.8 | −2.4 | |
Liberal | Robert Meek Carter | 15,105 | 29.2 | N/A | |
Conservative | William St James Wheelhouse | 9,437 | 18.2 | N/A | |
Liberal | Andrew Fairbairn | 5,658 | 10.9 | N/A | |
Conservative | Arthur Duncombe | 5,621 | 10.9 | N/A | |
Turnout | 19,764 (est) | 50.4 (est) | −35.5 | ||
Registered electors | 39,244 | ||||
Majority | 5,668 | 11.0 | +9.4 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Liberal win (new seat) | |||||
Majority | 3,779 | 7.3 | +5.4 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Meek Carter | 15,390 | 25.1 | −4.1 | |
Conservative | William St James Wheelhouse | 14,864 | 24.3 | +6.1 | |
Conservative | Robert Tennant | 13,194 | 21.5 | +10.6 | |
Liberal | Edward Baines | 11,850 | 19.3 | −11.5 | |
Liberal | Frederic Richard Lees [25] | 5,954 | 9.7 | −1.2 | |
Turnout | 25,094 (est) | 54.6 (est) | +4.2 | ||
Registered electors | 45,991 | ||||
Majority | 526 | 0.8 | −10.2 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −3.6 | |||
Majority | 1,344 | 2.2 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +11.1 |
Lees retired before polling day. [26]
Carter resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Barran | 16,672 | 54.8 | +0.7 | |
Conservative | William Jackson | 13,774 | 45.2 | −0.6 | |
Majority | 2,898 | 9.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 30,446 | 63.0 | +8.4 | ||
Registered electors | 48,313 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +0.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Ewart Gladstone | 24,622 | 33.5 | +8.4 | |
Liberal | John Barran | 23,647 | 32.1 | +3.1 | |
Conservative | William Jackson | 13,331 | 18.1 | −3.4 | |
Conservative | William St James Wheelhouse | 11,965 | 16.3 | −8.0 | |
Turnout | 36,783 (est) | 75.1 (est) | +20.5 | ||
Registered electors | 49,000 | ||||
Majority | 11,682 | 15.8 | N/A | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Gladstone was also elected MP for Midlothian and opted to sit there, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Herbert Gladstone | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Gladstone was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Herbert Gladstone | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Wakefield was a constituency in West Yorkshire. It was created as a borough constituency in 1832 and reformed as a county constituency in 1885.
Bedfordshire was a United Kingdom Parliamentary constituency, which elected two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of England from 1295 until 1707, then the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1801 and the House of Commons of the United Kingdom until 1885 when it was divided into two constituencies under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885.
The City of London was a United Kingdom parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1950.
Ripon was a constituency sending members to the House of Commons of England, Great Britain and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until 1983, centred on the city of Ripon in North Yorkshire.
Beverley has been the name of a parliamentary constituency in the East Riding of Yorkshire for three periods. From medieval times until 1869 it was a parliamentary borough consisting of a limited electorate of property owners of its early designated borders within the market town of Beverley, which returned (elected) two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the English and Welsh-turned-UK Parliament during that period.
Bradford was a parliamentary constituency in Bradford, in the West Riding of Yorkshire.
West Gloucestershire was a parliamentary constituency in Gloucestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Scarborough was the name of a constituency in Yorkshire, electing Members of Parliament to the House of Commons, at two periods. From 1295 until 1918 it was a parliamentary borough consisting only of the town of Scarborough, electing two MPs until 1885 and one from 1885 until 1918. In 1974 the name was revived for a county constituency, covering a much wider area; this constituency was abolished in 1997.
Malton, also called New Malton, was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England in 1295 and 1298, and again from 1640, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868, among them the political philosopher Edmund Burke, and by one member from 1868 to 1885.
West Riding of Yorkshire was a parliamentary constituency in England from 1832 to 1865. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
The East Riding of Yorkshire was a parliamentary constituency covering the East Riding of Yorkshire, omitting Beverley residents save a small minority of Beverley residents who also qualified on property grounds to vote in the county seat. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. A brief earlier guise of the seat covered the changed franchise of the First Protectorate Parliament and Second Protectorate Parliament during a fraction of the twenty years of England and Wales existed as a republic.
North Riding of Yorkshire was the constituency of the North Riding of Yorkshire. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Bristol was a two-member constituency, used to elect members to the House of Commons in the Parliaments of England, Great Britain (1707–1800), and the United Kingdom. The constituency existed until Bristol was divided into single member constituencies in 1885.
Thirsk was a parliamentary borough in Yorkshire, represented in the English and later British House of Commons in 1295, and again from 1547. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832, and by one member from 1832 to 1885, when the constituency was abolished and absorbed into the new Thirsk and Malton division of the North Riding of Yorkshire.
Northallerton was a parliamentary borough in the North Riding of Yorkshire, represented by two Members of Parliament in the House of Commons briefly in the 13th century and again from 1640 to 1832, and by one member from 1832 until 1885.
Knaresborough was a parliamentary constituency which returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the Parliament of England, Parliament of Great Britain and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until 1868, and then one MP until its abolition in 1885.
East Cornwall was a county constituency in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) by the bloc vote system of election.
New Shoreham, sometimes simply called Shoreham, was a parliamentary borough centred on the town of Shoreham-by-Sea in what is now West Sussex. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England from 1295 to 1707, then to the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1800, and finally to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until it was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, with effect from the 1885 general election.
East Worcestershire was a county constituency in the county of Worcestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Tynemouth and North Shields was a parliamentary borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom between 1832 and 1885. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first-past-the-post system of election.