Leeds (UK Parliament constituency)

Last updated

Leeds
Former borough constituency
for the House of Commons
Leeds Parliamentary Borough 1832.jpg
County West Riding of Yorkshire
Major settlements Leeds
18321885
Seats1832–1868: Two
1865–1885: Three
Created from Yorkshire
Replaced by Leeds Central
Leeds East
Leeds North
Leeds South
Leeds West

Leeds was a parliamentary borough covering the town of Leeds, in the West Riding of Yorkshire, England. It was represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1832 to 1885.

Contents

The borough returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) until 1868, and then three MPs from 1868 until the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 split the borough into five divisions at the 1885 general election.

Boundaries and History

Representation before 1832

Until the 1832 United Kingdom general election the major town of Leeds was represented in Parliament solely as a part of the county constituency of Yorkshire. The only exceptions had been that the town was represented as a single member borough in the First and Second Protectorate Parliaments from 1654 to 1658.

Before 1832 no new English Parliamentary borough had been enfranchised since the 1670s, but Leeds came close to being represented from 1826. Stooks Smith, in The Parliaments of England, explained what happened.

Immediately after the Parliament elected in 1818 had assembled in 1819, a petition was presented to the House of Commons, complaining in the usual terms, that gross bribery and corruption had been practised in the return of the two Members for the Borough of Grampound, in Cornwall. In the course of the Session the matter was minutely investigated and the alleged guilt incontrovertibly proved. The course of procedure in such cases was to pass an act disfranchising the place convicted, and transferring the right so abused and forfeited, to some other body of Electors. It devolved upon Lord John Russell, who had conducted the proceedings in the House of Commons ... to originate a Bill for the above purpose. On the meeting of the New Parliament, April 28th, Lord J. Russell gave notice that he should bring in his proposed bill for disfranchising Grampound and transferring the privilege to Leeds. The Bill was ... framed to extend the right of voting to all Householders rated at or over £5 per annum, which it was estimated would constitute a body of, at least 8,000 Electors for the Borough. When the ... measure came under discussion ... Mr Beaumont ... suggested that the County of York should be divided into two Counties, one consisting of the West Riding and the other of the North and East Ridings combined; and, that instead of giving two representatives to Leeds, they should be granted to either of these divisions - Mr Wynn ... objected ... but was the first to recommend that the two new Members be transferred to the County of York, in addition to the two it already returned. ... The Legislature ... assembled in January 1821 ... Mr Beaumont renewed his objection ... upon which a division took place. The numbers were, for the amendment 66, against it 126, leaving a majority of 60 in favour of the measure peoposed by Lord John Russell. The Bill, as introduced this session, so far deviated from that of the previous year as to confer the Elective franchise upon the Mayor and Corporation of Leeds, and all Householders within the Borough, assessed at not less than Ten Pounds instead of Five Pounds per annum to the poor and parish rates. This provision, it was found on examination, would still have thrown the right of returning members, chiefly into the hands of the inferior classes, and necessarily have fostered those impure and unprincipled practices, notoriously prevalent in places similarly privileged. Mr J.A.S. Wortley to remedy this defect, moved ... that the qualification should be limited to Householders rated at not less than Twenty Pounds per annum ... in its amended form the Bill passed the House of Commons.

The House of Lords amended the bill, as Mr Wynn had originally proposed, so Leeds had to wait until 1832 for enfranchisement.

Yorkshire was the largest of the historic counties of England. Between 1826 and 1832 the undivided county returned four Members of Parliament to the House of Commons, instead of the traditional two knights of the shire which the county had sent before then and all other English counties elected up until 1832.

County representation from 1832

The Reform Act 1832 divided Yorkshire into three county constituencies, which each returned two members. The divisions were based on the three ridings, which were traditional sub-divisions of Yorkshire. Leeds was part of the West Riding of Yorkshire and thus fell within that Riding constituency.

Charles Seymour, in Electoral Reform in England and Wales, commented about the debate in 1832 about the non resident freeholder vote. This was a particularly important issue for the West Riding because the major towns of Bradford, Leeds and Sheffield and the important ones of Halifax, Huddersfield and Wakefield were all to become new Parliamentary boroughs in 1832.

Though the general principle of the freeholder franchise was accepted without debate, one aspect of the question gave rise to much discussion at the time ... . The bill provided that the freeholders in boroughs who did not occupy their property should vote in the counties in which the borough was situated. This clause drew forth a torrent of complaint, especially from the Conservatives. Peel pointed out that it would be far simpler for the freeholders in the represented boroughs to vote in the borough where their property was situate instead of being forced to travel to the county polling place; moreover if the borough freeholders were allowed to vote in the counties he felt that the boroughs would have an unfair influence in county elections and the rural element would be submerged by the urban.

... Althorp ... pointed out that until 1832 freeholders in the unrepresented towns always had voted in the counties, so the Tories could hardly complain that the ministers were introducing new principles to favour urban interests ... .

Stooks Smith records the number of electors in the Leeds polling district of the West Riding of Yorkshire constituency, at a by-election in 1835, as 2,250 (out of a total electorate of 18,063). Although it is not known if all these Leeds area voters were qualified as non-resident freeholders in the borough, the numbers given for this and other polling districts named after Parliamentary boroughs suggest that up to two-thirds of the county voters in the West Riding might have qualified on that basis.

Borough representation from 1832

The remainder of this article deals with the borough representation only, which is its focus.

In addition to the county constituency changes, the Representation of the People Act 1832 enfranchised the town as a new two member Parliamentary borough. The Parliamentary Boundaries Act 1832 defined that borough as comprising the parish of Leeds.

Lord John Russell, who was the member of the Whig government most involved in taking the reform legislation through Parliament in 1832, still favoured a more extensive franchise than Tory Party spokesmen - just as had been the case more than a decade earlier. However, Russell now had a House of Commons more favourable to his point of view.

A uniform borough franchise was introduced, on top of the various ancient right franchises found in the old Parliamentary boroughs: (see the Unreformed House of Commons for a list of the different franchises in each borough). The new boroughs, like Leeds, had no ancient right borough voters so only the new franchise rules applied to them. Seymour explains that:-

Only one class of new rights was created by the act of 1832. This was the £10 occupation qualification. According to the act, the franchise was granted to all male persons who for a year before registration had occupied as owner or tenants "any house, warehouse, country house, shop or other building, either separately or jointly with any land" of a clear yearly value of £10. The land must be within the electoral limits of the borough; and in order to qualify, the occupier must have been rated in respect of such premises, to all rates for the relief of the poor; and he must have paid at the time of registration all rates and taxes due from him the preceding April.

This occupation franchise was the characteristic of the borough franchise after 1832. As ownership furnished the ordinary qualification for franchise in the counties, so in the boroughs, occupation, actual or constructive, was the basis of the suffrage. While however, in the counties no provision was made for ascertaining the true value or bona fide rent which was to qualify for the franchise; in the boroughs, assessment to the taxes was embodied with the condition of value, and actual payment was super-added. There was another difference between the character of the county and borough franchises, as determined by the Reform Act. In the latter no claimant could be registered as a voter if he had received parochial relief within the past twelve months; in the counties, no disqualification was attached to the receipt of poor-relief. ...

Third seat 1867

Under the Representation of the People Act 1867 Leeds was given a third seat, but the individual electors could only cast a maximum of two votes. This limited vote provision was designed to promote minority representation in the larger constituencies, which were mostly major cities. These provisions took effect from the 1868 United Kingdom general election.

Abolition 1885

Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 single member constituencies became the norm. Leeds was divided into five such seats: Leeds Central, Leeds East, Leeds North, Leeds South and Leeds West. The new constituencies were first used for the 1885 United Kingdom general election.

Members of Parliament

MPs 1654–1658 (Protectorate Parliaments)

ElectionFirst memberFirst party
1654 Adam Baynes
1656 Adam Baynes

MPs 1832–1868

ElectionFirst memberFirst partySecond memberSecond party
1832 John Marshall Whig [1] Thomas Babington Macaulay Whig [1]
1834 by-election Edward Baines Whig [1] [2] [3]
1835 Sir John Beckett Conservative [1]
1837 Sir William Molesworth Radical [1] [4] [5] [6] [7]
1841 William Beckett Conservative [1] William Aldam Whig [1] [8] [9]
1847 James Garth Marshall Whig [10] [11] [12]
1852 Matthew Talbot Baines Whig [13] [14] [15] [16] Sir George Goodman Whig [17] [18]
March 1857 Robert Hall Conservative
June 1857 by-election George Skirrow Beecroft Conservative
1859 Edward Baines (junior) Liberal
1868 Representation increased to three members

MPs 1868–1885

ElectionFirst memberFirst partySecond memberSecond partyThird memberThird party
1868 Edward Baines (junior) Liberal Robert Meek Carter Liberal William St James Wheelhouse Conservative
1874 Robert Tennant Conservative
1876 by-election John Barran Liberal
Apr 1880 William Ewart Gladstone [19] Liberal William Jackson Conservative
May 1880 by-election Herbert Gladstone Liberal
1885 Constituency divided: see Leeds Central, Leeds East, Leeds North, Leeds South and Leeds West

Elections

Elections in the 1830s

General election 1832: Leeds [20] [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Whig John Marshall 2,012 36.0
Whig Thomas Babington Macaulay 1,984 35.5
Tory Michael Thomas Sadler 1,59628.5
Majority3887.0
Turnout 3,54885.1
Registered electors 4,171
Whig win (new seat)
Whig win (new seat)

Macaulay resigned after being appointed as a member of the Council of India, causing a by-election.

By-election, 17 February 1834: Leeds [20] [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Edward Baines 1,951 50.1 21.4
Tory John Beckett 1,91749.3+20.8
Radical Joshua Bower240.6N/A
Majority340.86.2
Turnout 3,89276.98.2
Registered electors 5,062
Whig hold Swing 21.1
General election 1835: Leeds [20] [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative John Beckett 1,941 35.9 +7.4
Whig Edward Baines 1,803 33.3 2.7
Whig William Brougham 1,66530.84.7
Conservative John Plumbe Tempest [21] 40.1N/A
Turnout 3,63376.19.0
Registered electors 4,774
Majority2765.1N/A
Conservative gain from Whig Swing +7.4
Majority1,79933.2+26.2
Whig hold Swing 3.2
General election 1837: Leeds [20] [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Edward Baines 2,028 35.8 28.3
Radical William Molesworth 1,880 33.2 N/A
Conservative John Beckett 1,75931.05.0
Turnout 3,71966.79.4
Registered electors 5,579
Majority1482.630.6
Whig hold Swing 11.7
Majority1212.2N/A
Radical gain from Conservative Swing

Elections in the 1840s

General election 1841: Leeds [20] [1]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative William Beckett 2,076 25.7 +10.2
Whig William Aldam 2,043 25.3 10.5
Radical Joseph Hume 2,03325.28.0
Conservative Robert Jocelyn 1,92623.8+8.3
Turnout 4,09264.81.9
Registered electors 6,316
Majority430.5N/A
Conservative gain from Radical Swing +7.1
Majority100.12.5
Whig hold Swing 9.7
General election 1847: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative William Beckett 2,529 37.9 11.6
Whig James Garth Marshall 2,172 32.5 +7.2
Radical Joseph Sturge [22] 1,97829.6+4.4
Turnout 3,340 (est)53.0 (est)11.8
Registered electors 6,300
Majority3575.4+4.9
Conservative hold Swing 6.9
Majority1942.9+2.8
Whig hold Swing +2.5

Elections in the 1850s

General election 1852: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig George Goodman 2,344 34.1 +1.6
Whig Matthew Talbot Baines 2,311 33.6 +4.0
Conservative Robert Hall 1,13216.52.5
Conservative Thomas Sidney 1,08915.83.2
Majority1,17917.1N/A
Turnout 3,438 (est)53.7 (est)+0.7
Registered electors 6,406
Whig hold Swing +2.2
Whig gain from Conservative Swing +3.4

Baines was appointed president of the Poor Law Board, requiring a by-election.

By-election, 3 January 1853: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Matthew Talbot Baines Unopposed
Whig hold

Baines was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, requiring a by-election.

By-election, 6 February 1856: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Matthew Talbot Baines Unopposed
Whig hold
General election 1857: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig George Goodman 2,329 34.7 +0.6
Conservative Robert Hall 2,237 33.3 +1.0
Radical John Remington Mills [23] [24] 2,14331.91.7
Turnout 4,473 (est)72.1 (est)+18.4
Registered electors 6,204
Majority921.415.7
Whig hold Swing +0.1
Majority941.4N/A
Conservative gain from Whig Swing +0.4

Hall's death caused a by-election.

By-election, 5 June 1857: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative George Skirrow Beecroft 2,070 50.1 +16.8
Radical John Remington Mills 2,06449.9+18.0
Majority60.21.2
Turnout 4,13466.65.5
Registered electors 6,204
Conservative hold Swing 0.6
General election 1859: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Edward Baines 2,343 33.8 0.9
Conservative George Skirrow Beecroft 2,302 33.2 0.1
Liberal William Edward Forster 2,28032.9+1.0
Turnout 4,614 (est)77.6 (est)+5.5
Registered electors 6,204
Majority410.60.8
Liberal hold Swing 0.4
Majority220.31.1
Conservative hold Swing 0.1

Elections in the 1860s

General election 1865: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative George Skirrow Beecroft 3,223 35.1 +1.9
Liberal Edward Baines 3,045 33.2 0.6
Liberal John Russell 2,90231.61.3
Turnout 6,197 (est)85.9 (est)+8.3
Registered electors 7,217
Majority1781.9+1.6
Conservative hold Swing +1.1
Liberal hold Swing 0.8

Seat increased to three members

General election 1868: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Edward Baines 15,941 30.8 2.4
Liberal Robert Meek Carter 15,105 29.2 N/A
Conservative William St James Wheelhouse 9,437 18.2 N/A
Liberal Andrew Fairbairn 5,65810.9N/A
Conservative Arthur Duncombe 5,62110.9N/A
Turnout 19,764 (est)50.4 (est)35.5
Registered electors 39,244
Majority5,66811.0+9.4
Liberal hold Swing
Liberal win (new seat)
Majority3,7797.3+5.4
Conservative hold Swing

Elections in the 1870s

General election 1874: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Robert Meek Carter 15,390 25.1 4.1
Conservative William St James Wheelhouse 14,864 24.3 +6.1
Conservative Robert Tennant 13,194 21.5 +10.6
Liberal Edward Baines 11,85019.311.5
Liberal Frederic Richard Lees [25] 5,9549.71.2
Turnout 25,094 (est)54.6 (est)+4.2
Registered electors 45,991
Majority5260.810.2
Liberal hold Swing 3.6
Majority1,3442.2N/A
Conservative hold Swing +2.1
Conservative gain from Liberal Swing +11.1

Lees retired before polling day. [26]

Carter resigned, causing a by-election.

By-election, 15 Aug 1876: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal John Barran 16,672 54.8 +0.7
Conservative William Jackson 13,77445.20.6
Majority2,8989.6N/A
Turnout 30,44663.0+8.4
Registered electors 48,313
Liberal gain from Conservative Swing +0.7

Elections in the 1880s

General election 1880: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal William Ewart Gladstone 24,622 33.5 +8.4
Liberal John Barran 23,647 32.1 +3.1
Conservative William Jackson 13,331 18.1 3.4
Conservative William St James Wheelhouse 11,96516.38.0
Turnout 36,783 (est)75.1 (est)+20.5
Registered electors 49,000
Majority11,68215.8N/A
Liberal hold Swing
Liberal gain from Conservative Swing
Conservative hold Swing

Gladstone was also elected MP for Midlothian and opted to sit there, causing a by-election.

By-election, 10 May 1880: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Herbert Gladstone Unopposed
Liberal hold

Gladstone was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury, requiring a by-election.

By-election, 24 Aug 1881: Leeds [20]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Herbert Gladstone Unopposed
Liberal hold

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wakefield (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1832–2024

Wakefield was a constituency in West Yorkshire. It was created as a borough constituency in 1832 and reformed as a county constituency in 1885.

Bedfordshire was a United Kingdom Parliamentary constituency, which elected two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of England from 1295 until 1707, then the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1801 and the House of Commons of the United Kingdom until 1885 when it was divided into two constituencies under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">City of London (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885–1950

The City of London was a United Kingdom parliamentary constituency. It was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1950.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ripon (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1868–1983

Ripon was a constituency sending members to the House of Commons of England, Great Britain and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until 1983, centred on the city of Ripon in North Yorkshire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beverley (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1983–1997

Beverley has been the name of a parliamentary constituency in the East Riding of Yorkshire for three periods. From medieval times until 1869 it was a parliamentary borough consisting of a limited electorate of property owners of its early designated borders within the market town of Beverley, which returned (elected) two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the English and Welsh-turned-UK Parliament during that period.

Bradford was a parliamentary constituency in Bradford, in the West Riding of Yorkshire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Gloucestershire (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1950–1997

West Gloucestershire was a parliamentary constituency in Gloucestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scarborough (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1974–1997

Scarborough was the name of a constituency in Yorkshire, electing Members of Parliament to the House of Commons, at two periods. From 1295 until 1918 it was a parliamentary borough consisting only of the town of Scarborough, electing two MPs until 1885 and one from 1885 until 1918. In 1974 the name was revived for a county constituency, covering a much wider area; this constituency was abolished in 1997.

Malton, also called New Malton, was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England in 1295 and 1298, and again from 1640, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1885. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1868, among them the political philosopher Edmund Burke, and by one member from 1868 to 1885.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Riding of Yorkshire (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1832–1865

West Riding of Yorkshire was a parliamentary constituency in England from 1832 to 1865. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">East Riding of Yorkshire (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1832–1885

The East Riding of Yorkshire was a parliamentary constituency covering the East Riding of Yorkshire, omitting Beverley residents save a small minority of Beverley residents who also qualified on property grounds to vote in the county seat. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. A brief earlier guise of the seat covered the changed franchise of the First Protectorate Parliament and Second Protectorate Parliament during a fraction of the twenty years of England and Wales existed as a republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Riding of Yorkshire (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1832–1885

North Riding of Yorkshire was the constituency of the North Riding of Yorkshire. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Bristol was a two-member constituency, used to elect members to the House of Commons in the Parliaments of England, Great Britain (1707–1800), and the United Kingdom. The constituency existed until Bristol was divided into single member constituencies in 1885.

Thirsk was a parliamentary borough in Yorkshire, represented in the English and later British House of Commons in 1295, and again from 1547. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832, and by one member from 1832 to 1885, when the constituency was abolished and absorbed into the new Thirsk and Malton division of the North Riding of Yorkshire.

Northallerton was a parliamentary borough in the North Riding of Yorkshire, represented by two Members of Parliament in the House of Commons briefly in the 13th century and again from 1640 to 1832, and by one member from 1832 until 1885.

Knaresborough was a parliamentary constituency which returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the Parliament of England, Parliament of Great Britain and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until 1868, and then one MP until its abolition in 1885.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">East Cornwall (UK Parliament constituency)</span>

East Cornwall was a county constituency in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) by the bloc vote system of election.

New Shoreham, sometimes simply called Shoreham, was a parliamentary borough centred on the town of Shoreham-by-Sea in what is now West Sussex. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England from 1295 to 1707, then to the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1800, and finally to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until it was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, with effect from the 1885 general election.

East Worcestershire was a county constituency in the county of Worcestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Tynemouth and North Shields was a parliamentary borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom between 1832 and 1885. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first-past-the-post system of election.

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 155–156. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via Google Books.
  2. "London Courier and Evening Gazette" . 7 January 1835. p. 3. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  3. "Mr. Bower and Mr. Baines" . Leeds Times. 17 January 1835. p. 3. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  4. Churton, Edward (1838). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1838. p. 161. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via Google Books.
  5. Dod, Charles Roger; Dod, Robert Phipps (1847). Dod's Parliamentary Companion, Volume 15. Dod's Parliamentary Companion. p. 209. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via Google Books.
  6. "Newcastle Journal" . 6 September 1845. p. 2. Retrieved 23 October 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  7. "The Elections—Sunderland and Southwark" . Coventry Herald. 5 September 1845. p. 4. Retrieved 23 October 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  8. "General Election" . Morning Post. 2 July 1841. pp. 3–4. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  9. "Yorkshire Gazette" . 3 July 1841. p. 8. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  10. The Poll Book of the Leeds Borough Election, July, 1847. Leeds: T. W. Green & Co. 1847. p. 9. Retrieved 15 May 2018.
  11. "Leeds" . Morning Advertiser. 30 July 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 15 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  12. "Election Intelligence" . Lancaster Gazette. 17 July 1847. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 15 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  13. "Hull" . Yorkshire Gazette. 31 July 1847. p. 5. Retrieved 14 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  14. "The Hull Advertiser" . Hull Advertiser and Exchange Gazette. 23 July 1847. p. 6. Retrieved 14 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  15. Hawkins, Angus (1987). "Palmerstonian Politics". Parliament, Party and the Art of Politics in Britain, 1855-59. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. p. 31. ISBN   978-1-349-08925-3 . Retrieved 14 May 2018.
  16. Brown, David (2010). Palmerston: A Biography. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 774. ISBN   978-0-300-11898-8 . Retrieved 14 May 2018.
  17. Leeds man (1868). Memoirs of eminent men of Leeds (Digitized 2 September 2005 ed.). G.J. Berger. p. 60.
  18. "Leeds MPs". The Thoresby Society. Retrieved 15 May 2018.
  19. Gladstone was also elected for Midlothian, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Leeds
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. pp. 177–178. ISBN   978-1-349-02349-3.
  21. "The Leeds Election" . Leeds Times. 10 January 1835. p. 2. Retrieved 16 April 2020 via British Newspaper Archive.
  22. "The General Election" . Gloucester Journal. 31 July 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 15 November 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  23. "Southampton" . Hampshire Advertiser. 4 April 1857. p. 5. Retrieved 15 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  24. "The Yorkshire Elections, and Mr. Edward Baines" . Huddersfield Chronicle. 4 April 1857. p. 5. Retrieved 15 May 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  25. "Leeds" . Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer . 5 February 1874. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 4 January 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.
  26. "Leeds" . Aberdeen Press and Journal . 28 January 1874. p. 5. Retrieved 4 January 2018 via British Newspaper Archive.