Manifesto Against Work

Last updated

Manifesto Against Work is a manifesto critical of work written by the authors who were active in the journal Krisis a group that had the German philosopher Robert Kurz as one of its main contributors. [1] [2] The Manifesto Against Work emerged during the time in which the New Labour ideology spread across Europe in the late 1990s.

Contents

The writing is based on the thesis that the work-society has come to an end, but that this end is paradoxically accompanied by an increased radicalisation of waged work and the social phenomena related to it. In recent years, work has increasingly taken the form of an "irrational end in itself". The manifesto critiques both the prevailing principle that unemployment is due to personal weaknesses such as a lack of willingness to work or excessive demands, and a personalised criticism of managers or politicians. In addition to the phenomena of neoliberalism such as wage dumping and the sorting out of people who do not meet the demands of this ideology, on the other hand, the anti-neoliberal left, which is fixed on a reactionary attitude towards the days of the welfare state, is also criticised for maintaining the paradigm of waged work as meaningful. Work is thus described as a social phenomenon whose logic permeates and increasingly determines social life. In contrast to weltanschaaungsmarxismus, the value-critical writing takes up the very dependence and not the "opposition of capital and work". The manifesto argues against the notion of class struggle as the motor of history. According to Krisis, there is no class-subject, and the struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie is not a struggle between a revolutionary class and its oppressor, but rather a struggle between two opposed interests that are integral to contemporary society, and form a single "work camp". [3] Accordingly, the working class cannot be the subject of emancipatory change either. Since the historical role of the workers movement is also focused on a realisation of work, rather than the abolishing of it. So contrary to the given notion in modernity, they assert that the struggle against capital is not the struggle for the liberation of work, but rather a struggle for liberation from work. [4]

Content

  1. The rule of dead work - This section summarises how contemporary society seem obsessed with work as an end in itself activity. The manifesto starts off with the formulation: "A corpse rules society – the corpse of work. All powers around the globe formed an alliance to defend its rule: the Pope and the World Bank, Tony Blair and Jörg Haider, trade unions and entrepreneurs, German ecologists and French socialists. They don't know but one slogan: jobs, jobs, jobs!" The section further introduces crisis theory, and claims that contemporary society manages its social darwinism by referring to the "so-called "laws of the market economy".
  2. The neo-liberal apartheid society - This section theoretically outlines what would happen if the sale of the commodity known as "waged work" become the exception instead of the rule. The Krisis group claim that such a situation would result in social apartheid, highlights the working poor, and dismisses the idea of being able to "work your way up" with the formulation - "Those who left behind their brain on the coat rack may dream of working their way up to the position of a service industry millionaire." As well as theorises regarding the future of "the service industry".
  3. The neo-welfare-apartheid-state - Section three highlights the so-called neo-welfare-apartheid-states (anachronistic) fixation on the postwar era in what's called the state-run work-simulation. Where the state is supposed to make sure that people are engaged in waged work, by means of job programmes, compulsory work for people on welfare, subsidies, public debt etc. They also state that "The so-called activating workfare does even not spare persons who suffer from chronic disease or single mothers with little children. Recipients of social benefits are released from this administrative stranglehold only as soon as the nameplate is tied to their toe (i.e. in mortuary). The only reason for such state-obtrusiveness is to discourage as many people as possible from claiming benefits at all by displaying dreadful instruments of torture – any miserable job must appear comparatively pleasant."
  4. Exaggeration and denial of the work religion - This section traces the historical sources of what the Krisis gruppe claimed is "work fanaticism". Noting that: "Socialists and conservatives, democrats and fascists fought each other to the death, but despite all deadly hatred, they always paid homage to the work idol together. "Push the idler aside", is a line from the German lyrics of the international working [...] class anthem; " work makes free" it resounds eerily from the inscription above the gate in Auschwitz." they thereafter claim that during the end of the 20th century, all differences in political theory vanished, and that the uncritical dogma of merciless work was all that remained as the "natural destiny of human beings".
  5. Work is a coercive social principle - Section five makes some distinctions regarding what's claimed to be true, as well as false transhistorical claims regarding human activity. As well as touches upon the subject of the temporality in modernity, i.e Newtonian time. Which they claim "Even children are drilled to obey". Further they address that the social reproduction process doesn't differentiate between what is actually produced, as long as something is produced. Hence it doesn't matter "Whether houses are built or landmines are produced". The section then introduces a more sociological argument where "dead work", i.e. "capital", is treated as a reified metaphysical madness which holds this society captive.
  6. Work and capital are the two sides of the same coin - This section goes over the joint interest which renders all other questions superfluous to work-society except how as much work power can utilised as it is an end in itself. As well as addresses the indifference ruling powers can show when people are impoverished in the midst of affluence.
  7. Work is patriarchal rule - Section seven covers how the work society couldn't commodify aspects of care, and reproduction of the workforce within a logic of newtonian time. This led to a separation from the sphere of work, where the sphere of home life, family life, and intimacy came into being. The section also traces historical aspects of contemporary patriarchy.
  8. Work is the service of humans in bondage - This section traces the etymology of the word arbeit (German), labour, laborare (Latin:staggering under a heavy burden) and trabajo, (Latin: tripalium) which they claim is "according to its root, is not a synonym for self-determined human activity, but refers to an unfortunate social fate."
  9. The bloody history of work - Section nine historicises the how "The imposition to waste the most of one's lifetime under abstract systemic orders was not always as internalised as today." And claims that: "it took several centuries of brute force and violence on a large scale to literally torture people into the unconditional service of the work idol." They also emphasise the role of the state and taxes in forcing people to start engaging in waged work.
  10. The working class movement was a movement for work - Section ten historicizes how the class movement was a movement to realise work rather than to do away with it.
  11. The crisis of work - This section theorises regarding that the third industrial revolution have made work society all the more anachronistic, and touches upon topics such as globalisation.
  12. The end of politics - This section highlights how the crisis of work entails a crisis for the state, and for politics. They argue that this is the case due to the fact that the state "owes its career to the fact that the commodity producing system is in need of an overarching authority guaranteeing the general preconditions of competition, the general legal foundations, and the preconditions for the valorisation process"
  13. The casino-capitalist simulation of work society - Section thirteen argues that the current casino-capitalist simulation of work society is largely castles in the air. [5] Which they claim also is true for the economy itself. They argue that "Present-time work employed is replaced by the tapping of future-time work that will never be employed in reality – capital accumulation taking place in some fictitious future II so to speak." [6] They also argue that "Industrial corporations show profits that don't come from operating income, i.e. the production and sale of goods – a loss-making branch of business for a long time – but from the "clever" speculation of their financial departments in stocks and currency."
  14. Work can not be redefined - This section opens up with stating that: "After centuries of domestication, the modern human being can not even imagine a life without work. As a social imperative, work not only dominates the sphere of the economy in the narrow sense, but also pervades social existence as a whole, creeping into everyday life and deep under the skin of everybody. "Free time", a prison term in its literal meaning, is spent to consume commodities in order to increase (future) sales.". The section goes on to critique how the modern human is so socialised into the notion of the primacy of work that essentially all activity becomes transformed into activities that increasingly resemble work. The section also claims that work can't simply be redefined.
  15. The crisis of opposing interests - Section fifteen claims that the old forms of solidarity is rendered obsolete in the contemporary era due to a situation of general de-solidarity. As they stated it in the text:"The uncompromising de-solidarity is not restricted to the internal conflicts in companies or the rivalry between various trade unions. As all the functional categories of the work society in crisis fanatically insist on the logic immanent in the system, that is, that the well-being of humans has to be a mere by-product or side effect of capital valorisation, nowadays basically any conflict is governed by the "St. Florian-principle". (German saying/prayer: "Holy St. Florian, please spare my home. Instead of that you may set on fire the homes in my neighbourhood". St. Florian is the patron saint of fire protection.) All lobbyists know the rules and play the game. Any penny received by the clients of a competing faction is a loss. Any cut in social security payments to the detriment of others may improve one's own prospect of a further period of grace. Thus the old-age pensioner becomes the natural adversary of all social security contributors, the sick person turns into the enemy of health insurance policy holders, and the hatred of "native citizens" is unleashed on immigrants."
  16. The abolition of work - This section claims that work "For all its predominance, [...] never succeeded in completely wiping out the disgust at the constraints brought about by this form of social mediation. Apart from all the forms of regressive fundamentalism, the competition complex at the heart of social Darwinism in particular, a potential for protest and resistance does still exist." They claim that it is necessary to "think the unthinkable".
  17. A programme on the abolishment of work directed against the enthusiasts of work - Section seventeen oppose criticisms likely to face critics of work, such as being accused of being nothing but dreamers. The section therefore goes over the consequences of the status quo. Where e.g. "billions of humans are ostracised and can consider themselves lucky when they can survive on waste dumps". As well as critique the way of life in the global north, where people are "isolating themselves and numbing their minds by exposing themselves to a constant stream of dreary "entertainment". Or that the "fact that the world is made a desert currently just to breed more money out of money" (referring to the climate crisis). As well as rejecting the thought that this can be seen as something that "works". The section also attacks the notion that work is any natural state of human beings, with the phrases: "Your conceit rests on your ignorance and the weakness of your memory. In justification of your present and future crimes, you rely on the disastrous state of the world as brought about by your earlier crimes. It slipped your mind – actually you suppressed all memory of it – that the state was obliged to commit mass murder to drum your false "law of nature" into people until it became their second nature to consider it a privilege to be employed under the orders of the system idol who drains their life energy for the absurd end-in-itself." The section also further engages in anticipated reactions from those who believe in work as an end in itself. As well as further criticises work society for its wastefulness.
  18. The struggle against work is anti-politics - The last section of the manifesto claims that while the prospects today may seem bleek to society generally, this is a reason why the critique of work is so urgently needed. They claim that this can't be done through a political party, due to the fact that the whole point of politics is "to seize power (i.e. to become "the administration") and to carry on with work society." They claim that this is the reason that the opponents of work "don't want to take the control centres of power, but want to switch them off. They claim that their policy is "anti-politics". And the reason they give for this is that State and politics are inseparably intertwined in modernity, and hence have to disappear side by side. The very end of the last section states: Freedom neither means to be the human raw material of the markets, nor does it mean to be the dressage horse of state administration. Freedom means that human beings organise their social relations on their own without the intervention and mediation of an alienated apparatus.According to this spirit, the opponents of work want to create new forms of social movement and want to occupy bridgeheads for a reproduction of life beyond work. It is now a question of combining a counter-social practice with the offensive refusal of work.May the ruling powers call us fools because we risk the break with their irrational compulsory system! We have nothing to lose but the prospect of a catastrophe that humanity is currently heading for with the executives of the prevailing order at the helm. We can win a world beyond work.Workers of all countries, call it a day!

Related Research Articles

<i>The Communist Manifesto</i> 1848 political publication by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

The Communist Manifesto, originally the Manifesto of the Communist Party, is a political pamphlet written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, commissioned by the Communist League and originally published in London in 1848. The text is the first and most systematic attempt by Marx and Engels to codify for wide consumption the historical materialist idea that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles", in which social classes are defined by the relationship of people to the means of production. Published amid the Revolutions of 1848 in Europe, the manifesto remains one of the world's most influential political documents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-capitalism</span> Political ideology and movement opposed to capitalism

Anti-capitalism is a political ideology and movement encompassing a variety of attitudes and ideas that oppose capitalism. In this sense, anti-capitalists are those who wish to replace capitalism with another type of economic system, such as socialism or communism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commodity fetishism</span> Concept in Marxist analysis

In Marxist philosophy, commodity fetishism is the perception of the economic relationships of production and exchange as relationships among things rather than among people. As a form of reification, commodity fetishism presents economic value as inherent to the commodities, and not as arising from the workforce, from the human relations that produced the commodity, the goods and the services.

Labour power is the capacity to do work, a key concept used by Karl Marx in his critique of capitalist political economy. Marx distinguished between the capacity to do work, i.e. labour power, and the physical act of working, i.e. labour. Labour power exists in any kind of society, but on what terms it is traded or combined with means of production to produce goods and services has historically varied greatly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abstract labour and concrete labour</span> Distinction made by Karl Marx

Abstract labour and concrete labour refer to a distinction made by Karl Marx in his critique of political economy. It refers to the difference between human labour in general as economically valuable worktime versus human labour as a particular activity that has a specific useful effect within the (capitalist) mode of production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of capitalism</span> Arguments against the economic system of capitalism

Criticism of capitalism is a critique of political economy that involves the rejection of, or dissatisfaction with the economic system of capitalism and its outcomes. Criticisms typically range from expressing disagreement with particular aspects or outcomes of capitalism to rejecting the principles of the capitalist system in its entirety.

<i>Krisis</i> (magazine) German magazine

Krisis is an anti-political German political magazine and discussion group formed in 1986 as a "theoretical forum for a radical critique of capitalist society." Its members includes Robert Kurz, Roswitha Scholz, Nobert Trenkle, Ernst Lohoff, Achim Bellgart and Franz Schandl.

"Wage Labour and Capital" was an 1847 lecture by the critic of political economy and philosopher Karl Marx, first published as articles in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung in April 1849. It is widely considered the precursor to Marx’s influential treatise Das Kapital. It is commonly paired with Marx's 1865 lecture Value, Price and Profit. Previously, Marx had been studying political economy; evidence of this being his unpublished Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The Poverty of Philosophy in France in 1847.

<i>Das Kapital, Volume I</i> 1867 book by Karl Marx

Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I: The Process of Production of Capital is the first of three treatises that make up Das Kapital, a critique of political economy by the German philosopher and economist Karl Marx. First published on 14 September 1867, Volume I was the product of a decade of research and redrafting and is the only part of Das Kapital to be completed during Marx's life. It focuses on the aspect of capitalism that Marx refers to as the capitalist mode of production or how capitalism organises society to produce goods and services.

Marxian class theory asserts that an individual's position within a class hierarchy is determined by their role in the production process, and argues that political and ideological consciousness is determined by class position. A class is those who share common economic interests, are conscious of those interests, and engage in collective action which advances those interests. Within Marxian class theory, the structure of the production process forms the basis of class construction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Kurz</span> German philosopher (1943–2012)

Robert Kurz was a German philosopher, social critic, journalist and editor of the journal Exit! He was one of Germany's most prominent theorists of value criticism.

In Marxist theory and Marxian economics, the immiseration thesis, also referred to as emiseration thesis, is derived from Karl Marx's analysis of economic development in capitalism, implying that the nature of capitalist production stabilizes real wages, reducing wage growth relative to total value creation in the economy. Even if real wages rise, therefore, the overall labor share of income decreases, leading to the increasing power of capital in society.

In the Marxist theory of historical materialism, a mode of production is a specific combination of the:

Exploitation is a concept defined as, in its broadest sense, one agent taking unfair advantage of another agent. When applying this to labour, it denotes an unjust social relationship based on an asymmetry of power or unequal exchange of value between workers and their employers. When speaking about exploitation, there is a direct affiliation with consumption in social theory and traditionally this would label exploitation as unfairly taking advantage of another person because of their vulnerable position, giving the exploiter the power.

In Karl Marx's critique of political economy and subsequent Marxian analyses, the capitalist mode of production refers to the systems of organizing production and distribution within capitalist societies. Private money-making in various forms preceded the development of the capitalist mode of production as such. The capitalist mode of production proper, based on wage-labour and private ownership of the means of production and on industrial technology, began to grow rapidly in Western Europe from the Industrial Revolution, later extending to most of the world.

Value criticism is a social theory which draws its foundation from the Marxian tradition and criticizes the contemporary mode of production. Value criticism was developed partly by critical readings of the traditions of the Frankfurt School and critical theory. Prominent adherents of value criticism include Robert Kurz, Moishe Postone and Jean-Marie Vincent.

<i>Das Kapital</i> Foundational theoretical text of Karl Marx

Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, also known as Capital and Das Kapital, is a foundational theoretical text in materialist philosophy and critique of political economy written by Karl Marx, published as three volumes in 1867, 1885, and 1894. The culmination of his life's work, the text contains Marx's analysis of capitalism, to which he sought to apply his theory of historical materialism "to lay bare the economic law of motion of modern society", following from classical political economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. The text's second and third volumes were completed from Marx's notes after his death and published by his colleague Friedrich Engels. Das Kapital is the most cited book in the social sciences published before 1950.

Marxian economics, or the Marxian school of economics, is a heterodox school of political economic thought. Its foundations can be traced back to Karl Marx's critique of political economy. However, unlike critics of political economy, Marxian economists tend to accept the concept of the economy prima facie. Marxian economics comprises several different theories and includes multiple schools of thought, which are sometimes opposed to each other; in many cases Marxian analysis is used to complement, or to supplement, other economic approaches. Because one does not necessarily have to be politically Marxist to be economically Marxian, the two adjectives coexist in usage, rather than being synonymous: They share a semantic field, while also allowing both connotative and denotative differences. An example of this can be found in the works of Soviet economists like Lev Gatovsky, who sought to apply Marxist economic theory to the objectives, needs, and political conditions of the socialist construction in the Soviet Union, contributing to the development of Soviet Political Economy.

Marxist philosophy or Marxist theory are works in philosophy that are strongly influenced by Karl Marx's materialist approach to theory, or works written by Marxists. Marxist philosophy may be broadly divided into Western Marxism, which drew from various sources, and the official philosophy in the Soviet Union, which enforced a rigid reading of what Marx called dialectical materialism, in particular during the 1930s. Marxist philosophy is not a strictly defined sub-field of philosophy, because the diverse influence of Marxist theory has extended into fields as varied as aesthetics, ethics, ontology, epistemology, social philosophy, political philosophy, the philosophy of science, and the philosophy of history. The key characteristics of Marxism in philosophy are its materialism and its commitment to political practice as the end goal of all thought. The theory is also about the struggles of the proletariat and their reprimand of the bourgeoisie.

Historical materialism is Karl Marx's theory of history. Marx located historical change in the rise of class societies and the way humans labor together to make their livelihoods.

References

  1. ↑ "Manifesto against Labour". Krisis (in German). 1999-12-31. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  2. ↑ Please note that this work has been translated to English as Manifesto against labour, due to the German word for work being the same the word as for labour in German: Arbeit. This has been corrected in this article, but the translated English original still has this issue.
  3. ↑ "Manifesto against Labour". Krisis (in German). 1999-12-31. Retrieved 2022-03-29. Class struggle was the form of battling out opposite interests on the common social ground and reference system of the commodity-producing system. It was germane to the inner dynamics of capital accumulation.
  4. ↑ "Manifesto against Labour". Krisis (in German). 1999-12-31. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  5. ↑ "castles in the air". TheFreeDictionary.com. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  6. ↑ (M-M')

As audio

Translations

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.