Money burning

Last updated
Burn Your Money, an interactive artwork at Center Camp, Burning Man was later burned at the Burn Wall Street artwork on the playa Burn Your Money.jpg
Burn Your Money, an interactive artwork at Center Camp, Burning Man was later burned at the Burn Wall Street artwork on the playa

Money burning or burning money is the purposeful act of destroying money. In the prototypical example, banknotes are destroyed by setting them on fire. Burning money decreases the wealth of the owner without directly enriching any particular party. It also reduces the money supply and (very slightly) slows down the inflation rate.

Contents

Money is usually burned to communicate a message, either for artistic effect, as a form of protest, or as a signal. In some games, a player can sometimes benefit from the ability to burn money (battle of the sexes). The burning of money is illegal in some jurisdictions. [1]

Macroeconomic effect

For the purposes of macroeconomics, burning money is equivalent to removing the money from circulation, and locking it away forever; the salient feature is that no one may ever use the money again. Burning money shrinks the money supply, and is therefore a special case of contractionary monetary policy that can be implemented by anyone. In the usual case, the central bank withdraws money from circulation by selling government bonds or foreign currency. The difference with money burning is that the central bank does not have to exchange any assets of value for the money burnt. Money burning is thus equivalent to gifting the money back to the central bank (or other money issuing authority). If the economy is at full employment equilibrium, shrinking the money supply causes deflation (or decreases the rate of inflation), increasing the real value of the money left in circulation.

Assuming that the burned money is paper money with negligible intrinsic value, no real goods are destroyed, so the overall wealth of the world is unaffected. Instead, all surviving money slightly increases in value; everyone gains wealth in proportion to the amount of money they already hold. [2] Economist Steven Landsburg proposes in The Armchair Economist that burning one's fortune (in paper money) is a form of philanthropy more egalitarian than deeding it to the United States Treasury. [2] In 1920, Thomas Nixon Carver wrote that dumping money into the sea is better for society than spending it wastefully, as the latter wastes the labor that it hires. [3]

Opposites

Central banks routinely collect and destroy worn-out coins and banknotes in exchange for new ones. This does not affect the money supply, and is done to maintain a healthy population of usable currency. The practice raises an interesting possibility. If an individual can steal the money before it is incinerated, the effect is the opposite of burning money; the thief is enriched at the expense of the rest of society. One such incident at the Bank of England inspired the 2001 TV movie Hot Money and the 2008 film Mad Money . [4]

Another, more common near-opposite is the creation of counterfeit money. Undetected counterfeit decreases the value of existing money—one of the reasons why attempting to pass it is illegal in most jurisdictions and is aggressively investigated. [5] Another way to analyze the cost of forgery is to consider the effects of a central bank's monetary policy. Taking the United States as an example, if the Federal Reserve decides that the monetary base should be a given amount, then every $100 bill forged is a bill the Fed cannot print and use to buy Treasury bonds. The interest earnings (after expenses) on those bonds is turned over to the US Treasury, so any lost interest must be made up by U.S. taxpayers, who therefore bear the cost of counterfeiting. [6]

Rationales

Behaviorally speaking, burning money is usually seen as a purely negative act. The cognitive impact of burning money can even be a useful motivational tool: patients who suffer from nail biting may be trained to burn a dollar bill every time they engage in the habit. One study found this form of suppression training by self-punishment to be effective compared to control groups, although not as effective as substitution training. [7]

On the other hand, there are some situations where burning money might not be so unreasonable. It is said [8] that the ancient Greek philosopher Aristippus was once on a ship at sea when he was threatened by pirates; he took out his money, counted it, and dropped it into the sea, commenting, "Better for the money to perish because of Aristippus than vice versa." Cicero would later cite this episode as an example of a circumstance that must be considered in its full context: "...it is a useless act to throw money into the sea; but not with the design which Aristippus had when he did so." [9]

Since around 2015 the UK has experienced a surge of interest in money burning. This has been noted in both the book The Mysterium [10] and in a Kindred Spirit article that is reprinted in International Times. [11] An annual Mass Burn Event - where people are invited to burn money - is held at the Cockpit Theatre in London every autumn. [12] [13]

Symbolism

Joss paper burned near the time of the Ghost Festival as an offering to the departed. Burning-money-and-yuanbao-at-the-cemetery-3249.JPG
Joss paper burned near the time of the Ghost Festival as an offering to the departed.
Swedish politician Gudrun Schyman burning money to protest inequality. Gudrun eldar hundra tusen - och hettar upp debatten IMG 6403.jpg
Swedish politician Gudrun Schyman burning money to protest inequality.

Publicly burning money can be an act of protest or a kind of artistic statement. Often the point is to emphasize money's intrinsic worthlessness. [2]

In 1984, Serge Gainsbourg burned a 500 French franc note on television to protest against heavy taxation. [14]

On 23 August 1994, the K Foundation (an art duo consisting of Bill Drummond and Jimmy Cauty) burned one million pounds sterling in cash on the Scottish island of Jura. This money represented the bulk of the K Foundation's funds, earned by Drummond and Cauty as The KLF, one of the United Kingdom's most successful pop groups of the early 1990s. The duo have never fully explained their motivations for the burning. [15]

In the 1995 film Dead Presidents , the title sequence directed by Kyle Cooper features close shots of burning U.S. bills; it took two days of shooting and experimenting with the paper to get the effect right. [16]

In the early 18th century, New York City courts would publicly burn the counterfeit bills they gathered, to show that they were both dangerous and worthless. [17]

In traditional Chinese and Vietnamese ancestor veneration, imitation money in the form of joss paper are ceremonially burned, with the aspiration that the dead may use the money to finance a more comfortable afterlife.

In 2010, the spokesperson for the Swedish Feminist Initiative, Gudrun Schyman, burned SEK 100,000 during a speech about the inequality in wages for men and women. [18]

In 2018, a collective of artists called Distributed Gallery have created a machine named Chaos Machine which burns banknotes and turns them into cryptocurrencies while playing music. [19]

Game theory

In game theory, a threat to burn money can affect the strategies of the players involved; a classic example is the situation described as 'battle of the sexes', where the ability to burn money allows the player to achieve the desired equilibrium without actually having to burn money. [20] [21]

For commodity value

Fiat money can sometimes be destroyed by converting it into commodity form, rather than completely forfeiting the value of the money. Sometimes, currency intended for use as fiat money becomes more valuable as a commodity, usually when inflation causes its face value to fall below its intrinsic value. For example, in India in 2007, Rupee coins disappeared from the market when their face value dropped below the value of the stainless steel from which they were made. [22] Similarly, in 1965, the US government had to switch from silver to copper-nickel clad quarter coins because the silver value of the coins had exceeded their face value and were being melted down by individuals for profit. The same occurred to 5-franc coins of Switzerland, which up to the year 1969 were minted using a silver alloy. At the peak of hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic, people burned banknotes for warmth, as their face value had fallen below their value as fuel. [6]

Legality

The legality of money burning varies with jurisdiction.

Australia

Section 16 of the Crimes (Currency) Act 1981 prohibits deliberate damage and destruction of Australian money without a relevant legal permit. The law covers both current Australian money and historical coins and notes. Breaking this law can lead to detention or a fine. [23]

According to this law, even writing words on a banknote can be punished. [24]

Brazil

In Brazil, whether it is illegal for a person to burn his or her own money is a controversial topic. [25] It is not mentioned explicitly in Brazilian law. João Sidney Figueiredo Filho, [26] the head of the central bank, has affirmed that "when money is inside the Central Bank, then it is the property of the National Treasury. When it leaves, it is not." But the chief of police Jéferson Botelho Pereira has concluded that "whoever rips money is committing a crime against the property of the Union". [27]

The production of paper money by the State Bank is under the exclusive authority of the Central Bank, and is issued by the Brazilian Union. [28] By that reasoning, the paper on which the money is printed is the property of the State, and its intrinsic value belongs to the person. Articles 98 and 99 of the New Brazilian Civil Code give "money" its own definition. This is because a banknote cannot become a common good, if the owner himself decides to keep it in his possession indefinitely. This makes money different from other state assets such as rivers, seas, streets, roads and piazzas, which are all immobile.

Canada

The Currency Act states that "no person shall melt down, break up or use otherwise than as currency any coin that is legal tender in Canada." Similarly, Section 456 of The Criminal Code of Canada says: "Every one who (a) defaces a current coin, or (b) utters a current coin that has been defaced, is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."

However neither the Currency Act nor Criminal Code mention paper currency. It therefore remains legal to completely destroy paper currency. [29]

Euro Zone

According to the European Commission's Recommendation dated 22 March 2010, [30] "Member states must not prohibit or punish the complete destruction of small quantities of Euro coins or notes when this happens in private. However they must prohibit the unauthorised destruction of large amounts of Euro coins or notes." Also, "Member states must not encourage the mutilation of Euro notes or coins for artistic purposes, but they are required to tolerate it. Mutilated coins or notes should be considered unfit for circulation."

The European Union defines "falsifying or fraudulently altering money in any way" as a crime. [31] Also, according to the EU ruling 1210/2010, "all money that is unfit for circulation must be delivered to the relevant national authority". EU countries must remove the currency from circulation and reimburse the holder", [32] no matter what the country of issue. [33]

The European Central Bank has established that "Member states may refuse to reimburse Euro money that has been deliberately rendered unfit for circulation, or where it has been caused by a process that would predictably have led to the money becoming unfit. The exception to this is money collected for charitable purposes, such as coins thrown into a fountain". [34] The ECB legal department also states "the ECB will refuse to replace money that has been stamped for advertising purposes". [35]

The European Union provides an obligation at the community level to retire "neutralized" notes from circulation, or those rendered unfit for security systems. [36]

New Zealand

Section 28 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1990 makes it an offence to wilfully deface, disfigure, or mutilate any bank note in New Zealand. The penalty is a fine of up to NZ$1,000. [37]

Singapore

Singapore's Currency Act states that any person who mutilate, destroy, deface, or causes any change (to diminish value/utility of) currency note or coin is fined up to $2,000. [38]

Taiwan

Intentionally damaging coins or notes, and rendering them unusable, is fined up to 5 times the nominal value of such coins or notes. [39]

Turkey

In Turkey, defacement or destruction of banknotes can be punished with fines or with prison sentences.[ citation needed ]

United Kingdom

The Currency and Bank Notes Act 1928 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom relating to banknotes. Among other things, it makes it a criminal offence to deface a banknote (but not to destroy one). Under Section 10 of the Coinage Act 1971 "No person shall, except under the authority of a licence granted by the Treasury, melt down or break up any metal coin which is for the time being current in the United Kingdom or which, having been current there, has at any time after 16th May 1969 ceased to be so." As the process of creating elongated coins does not require them to be melted nor broken up, however, Section 10 does not apply and coin elongation is legal within the UK with penny press machines.

United States

A receipt from the Albany, New York Comptroller's Office certifying that $5,000 from the Bank of Whitestown had been legally destroyed by burning on 15 November 1842. US-Albany Comptroller currency burn receipt (1842).jpg
A receipt from the Albany, New York Comptroller's Office certifying that $5,000 from the Bank of Whitestown had been legally destroyed by burning on 15 November 1842.

In the United States, burning banknotes is prohibited under 18 U.S.C.   § 333 : Mutilation of national bank obligations, which includes "any other thing" that renders a note "unfit to be reissued". [40] In an amicus brief for Atwater v. City of Lago Vista , Solicitor General Seth Waxman writes that arresting an individual who removes the corner dollar values "may expose a counterfeiting operation". [41] It is unclear if the statute has ever been applied in response to the complete destruction of a bill. Certainly people have publicly burned small amounts of money for political protests that were picked up by the media — Living Things at South by Southwest, [42] Larry Kudlow on The Call , both in 2009 [43] — without apparent consequence.

The question of legality has been compared to the much more politically charged issue of flag desecration. It can be argued that the desecration of the flag is comparable to the desecration of a photograph of Legal Tender (provided it was modified as to not violate counterfeiting laws). In 1989, in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Flag Protection Act, William Barr testified that any regulation protecting something purely for its symbolic value would be struck down as unconstitutional. The Senate report recommending passage of the Act argued that Barr's theory would render 18 U.S.C. § 333 unconstitutional as well. [44] In a dissent in Smith v. Goguen , Justice Rehnquist counted 18 U.S.C. § 333 in a group of statutes in which the Government protects its interest in some private property which is "not a traditional property interest". [45] On the other hand, the Government's interest in protecting circulating currency might not be purely symbolic; it costs the Bureau of Engraving and Printing approximately 5 cents to replace a note. [40]

Legal Tender, [46] a 1996 telerobotic art installment by Ken Goldberg, Eric Paulos, Judith Donath, and Mark Pauline, was an experiment to see if the law could instill a sense of physical risk in online interactions. After participants were advised that 18 U.S.C. § 333 threatened them with up to six months in jail, they were given the option of remotely defacing small portions of a pair of "purportedly authentic" $100 bills over the web. A crime may be occurring — but "only if the bills are real, the web site is authentic, and the experiment actually performed." [47] In fact, one bill was real and the other counterfeit. [48] Almost all of the participants reported that they believed the experiment and the bills to be faked. [49]

The destruction of money is also bound by the same laws that govern the destruction of other personal property. In particular, one cannot empower the executor of one's estate to burn one's money after one dies. [50]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cash</span> Physical money

In economics, cash is money in the physical form of currency, such as banknotes and coins.

The Kwacha is the currency of Zambia. It is subdivided into 100 Ngwee.

Seigniorage, also spelled seignorage or seigneurage, is the difference between the value of money and the cost to produce and distribute it. The term can be applied in two ways:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian dollar</span> Currency of Australia

The Australian dollar is the official currency and legal tender of Australia, including all of its external territories, and three independent sovereign Pacific Island states: Kiribati, Nauru, and Tuvalu. As of 2022, it is the sixth most-traded currency in the foreign exchange market and also the seventh most-held reserve currency in global reserves.

Federal Reserve Notes, also United States banknotes, are the currently issued banknotes of the United States dollar. The United States Bureau of Engraving and Printing produces the notes under the authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and issues them to the Federal Reserve Banks at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Reserve Banks then circulate the notes to their member banks, at which point they become liabilities of the Reserve Banks and obligations of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banknote</span> Form of physical currency made of paper, cotton or polymer

A banknote—also called a bill, paper money, or simply a note—is a type of negotiable promissory note, made by a bank or other licensed authority, payable to the bearer on demand. Banknotes were originally issued by commercial banks, which were legally required to redeem the notes for legal tender when presented to the chief cashier of the originating bank. These commercial banknotes only traded at face value in the market served by the issuing bank. Commercial banknotes have primarily been replaced by national banknotes issued by central banks or monetary authorities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal tender</span> Medium of payment recognized by law

Legal tender is a form of money that courts of law are required to recognize as satisfactory payment for any monetary debt. Each jurisdiction determines what is legal tender, but essentially it is anything which when offered ("tendered") in payment of a debt extinguishes the debt. There is no obligation on the creditor to accept the tendered payment, but the act of tendering the payment in legal tender discharges the debt.

The Korean People's won, more commonly known as the North Korean won and sometimes known as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea won, is the official currency of North Korea. It is subdivided into 100 chon. The currency is issued by the Central Bank of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, based in the North Korean capital city of Pyongyang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Korean won</span> Official currency of South Korea

The South Korean won is the official currency of South Korea. A single won is divided into 100 jeon, the monetary subunit. The jeon is no longer used for everyday transactions, and it appears only in foreign exchange rates. The currency is issued by the Bank of Korea, based in the capital city of Seoul.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States one-hundred-dollar bill</span> Current denomination of United States currency

The United States one-hundred-dollar bill ($100) is a denomination of United States currency. The first United States Note with this value was issued in 1862 and the Federal Reserve Note version was first produced in 1914. Inventor and U.S. Founding Father Benjamin Franklin has been featured on the obverse of the bill since 1914, which now also contains stylized images of the Declaration of Independence, a quill pen, the Syng inkwell, and the Liberty Bell. The reverse depicts Independence Hall in Philadelphia, which it has featured since 1928.

Large denominations of United States currency greater than $100 were circulated by the United States Treasury until 1969. Since then, U.S. dollar banknotes have been issued in seven denominations: $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Counterfeit money</span> Imitation currency produced without the legal sanction of a state or government

Counterfeit money is currency produced outside of the legal sanction of a state or government, usually in a deliberate attempt to imitate that currency and so as to deceive its recipient. Producing or using counterfeit money is a form of fraud or forgery, and is illegal in all jurisdictions of the world. The business of counterfeiting money is nearly as old as money itself: plated copies have been found of Lydian coins, which are thought to be among the first Western coins. Before the introduction of paper money, the most prevalent method of counterfeiting involved mixing base metals with pure gold or silver. Another form of counterfeiting is the production of documents by legitimate printers in response to fraudulent instructions. During World War II, the Nazis forged British pounds and American dollars. Today, some of the finest counterfeit banknotes are called Superdollars because of their high quality and imitation of the real US dollar. There has been significant counterfeiting of Euro banknotes and coins since the launch of the currency in 2002, but considerably less than that of the US dollar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manchukuo yuan</span> Currency of the Empire of Manchuria

The Manchukuo yuan was the official unit of currency of the Empire of Manchuria, from June 1932 to August 1945.

The history of the United States dollar began with moves by the Founding Fathers of the United States of America to establish a national currency based on the Spanish silver dollar, which had been in use in the North American colonies of the Kingdom of Great Britain for over 100 years prior to the United States Declaration of Independence. The new Congress's Coinage Act of 1792 established the United States dollar as the country's standard unit of money, creating the United States Mint tasked with producing and circulating coinage. Initially defined under a bimetallic standard in terms of a fixed quantity of silver or gold, it formally adopted the gold standard in 1900, and finally eliminated all links to gold in 1971.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banknotes of the Canadian dollar</span> Overview of banknotes issued by Canada

Banknotes of the Canadian dollar are the banknotes or bills of Canada, denominated in Canadian dollars. Currently, they are issued in $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100 denominations. All current notes are issued by the Bank of Canada, which released its first series of notes in 1935. The Bank of Canada has contracted the Canadian Bank Note Company to produce the Canadian notes since then. The current series of polymer banknotes were introduced into circulation between November 2011 and November 2013. Banknotes issued in Canada can be viewed at the Bank of Canada Museum in Ottawa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Money</span> Object or record accepted as payment

Money is any item or verifiable record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts, such as taxes, in a particular country or socio-economic context. The primary functions which distinguish money are: medium of exchange, a unit of account, a store of value and sometimes, a standard of deferred payment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birds of Canada (banknotes)</span>

Birds of Canada is the fifth series of banknotes of the Canadian dollar issued by the Bank of Canada and was first circulated in 1986 to replace the 1969 Scenes of Canada series. Each note features a bird indigenous to Canada in its design. The banknotes weigh 1 gram with dimensions of 152.40 by 69.85 millimetres. It was succeeded by the 2001 Canadian Journey series.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euro banknotes</span> Banknotes

Banknotes of the euro, the common currency of the eurozone, have been in circulation since the first series was issued in 2002. They are issued by the national central banks of the Eurosystem or the European Central Bank. The euro was established in 1999, but "for the first three years it was an invisible currency, used for accounting purposes only, e.g. in electronic payments". In 2002, notes and coins began to circulate. The euro rapidly took over from the former national currencies and slowly expanded around the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">50 euro note</span> Banknote of the European Union

The fifty euro note (€50) is one of the middle value euro banknotes and has been used since the introduction of the euro in 2002. The note is used by some 343 million Europeans and in the 25 countries which have the euro as their sole currency. In July 2023, there were about 14,523,000,000 fifty euro banknotes in circulation in the eurozone. It is by far the most widely circulated denomination, accounting for almost half (49.0%) of the total banknotes. Estimates suggest that the average life of a fifty euro banknote is about four years before it is replaced due to wear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">500 euro note</span> Banknote of the European Union

The five-hundred-euro note (€500) is the highest-value euro banknote; it was produced between the introduction of the euro in 2002 until 2019. Since 27 April 2019, the banknote has no longer been issued by central banks in the euro area, but it continues to be legal tender and can be used as a means of payment. It is one of the highest-value circulating banknotes in the world, worth around 537 USD; 3,902 CNY; 79,165 JPY; 430 GBP, or 479 CHF as of September 2023. The note is used in the 26 countries which have the euro as their sole currency, with a population of about 343 million.

References

  1. Acosta, Rocky (6 March 2013). "Currency as Art 2.0 - Defacing Bills". Arttechlaw.com. Archived from the original on 16 April 2015. Retrieved 8 April 2013.
  2. 1 2 3 Landsburg, Steven (1995). The Armchair Economist. pp.  68–69.
  3. Carver, T. N. (January 1920). "The Relation of Thrift to Nation Building". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 87: 5. doi:10.1177/000271622008700102. S2CID   143986614 . Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  4. As usual for a heist comedy, Mad Money avoids the moral implications of the act; see the review by Chang, Justin (15 January 2008). "Mad Money". Variety. Retrieved 4 August 2009.
  5. Musgrave, Frank; Kacapyr, Elia (2001). How to Prepare for the AP Macroeconomics/Microeconomics (2 ed.). pp. 243–244.
  6. 1 2 Krugman, Paul; Wells, Robin (2009). Economics (2nd ed.). pp.  400, 864.
  7. Adesso, Vincent J.; Norberg, Melissa M. (2006). "Behavioral Interventions for Oral-Digital Habits". In Douglas W. Woods; Raymond G. Miltenberger (eds.). Tic Disorders, Trichotillomania, and Other Repetitive Behavior Disorders . p.  230.
  8. Diogenes Laërtius; D. S. Hutchinson (2000). Lives and Sayings of Famous Philosophers, Book I, Chapter 8: Aristippus of Cyrene (PDF). p. 77. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 August 2009. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  9. Cicero (2004). De Inventione. Translated by C. D. Yonge. Kessenger Publishing. p. 133.
  10. Tinsley, Jo; Bramwell, David (2017). The Mysterium. Chambers. ISBN   978-1-4736-6357-2.
  11. "Money Burning | IT". internationaltimes.it. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  12. "Cockpit Theatre Event" . Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  13. "Rituelle Performance in London - Gemeinsames Geldverbrennen als Befreiung". Deutschlandfunk Kultur. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  14. Hodgkinson, Will (5 February 2003). "Serge, mon amour". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  15. Reid, Jim (1994-09-25). "Money To Burn". Observer. Archived from the original on 2015-06-26. Retrieved 2009-08-10.
  16. Codrington, Andrea (2003). Kyle Cooper . Yale University Press. p.  26. ISBN   978-0-300-09951-5.
  17. Zabin, Serena R. (2009). Dangerous Economies: Status and Commerce in Imperial New York. p. 19.
  18. "Viktigt att synas i Almedalen" [Important to get noticed in Almedalen]. Sveriges Radio (in Swedish). 7 July 2010. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  19. ""Proof of Work" at Schinkel Pavillon". 21 September 2018.
  20. Myerson, Roger B. (1997) [1991], Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, pp. 193–195, ISBN   0-674-34116-3
  21. Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean (1991), Game Theory, MIT Press, pp. 461–463, ISBN   0-262-06141-4
  22. O'Connor, Ashling (16 June 2007). "Coins run out as smugglers turn rupees into razors". Times Online. London. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  23. "Deliberate Damage". Reserve Bank of Australia Banknotes. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  24. "Defacing bank notes costs $500 | Sunshine Coast News | Local News in Sunshine Coast | Sunshine Coast Daily". Archived from the original on December 31, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  25. Botelho, Jéferson (22 October 2008). Rasgar papel-moeda é crime ou apenas um ato de loucura?. Brasil: Conjur. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
  26. http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4123407P9
  27. Morais, Mayson (12 September 2009). "Curiosidades: cheque pré-datado e destruição de dinheiro". Direito Uninorte. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
  28. Jéferson, Botelho (15 October 2008). "Rasgar papel-moeda: loucura ou crime?". Jeferson Botelho. Archived from the original on 5 May 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
  29. "Calgary's AMP Radio going ahead with 'Bank It or Burn It' contest after it came under fire for incinerating $5,000". National Post. 2014-03-24. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  30. "L_2010083EN.01007001.xml". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  31. "EUR-Lex - 32000F0383 - IT". Gazzetta ufficiale n. L 140 del 14/06/2000 pag. 0001–0003. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  32. Ruling (EU) n. 1210/2010 of the European Parliament and Council, 15 December 2010
  33. "Banca d'Italia - Monete danneggiate". Archived from the original on September 28, 2012. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  34. "Decisione - 2003/205 - IT - EUR-Lex" . Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  35. Banconote.it, La parola a Crapanzano
  36. "Ruling (EU) n. 1214/2011 of the European Parliament and Council, 16 November 2011". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved February 14, 2024.
  37. "Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989". New Zealand Legislation Online. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
  38. "Currency Act - Singapore Statutes Online".
  39. "Penal Act of Offenses Against National Currency: Article 5". Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China. Ministry of Justice (Taiwan). 2011-06-29. Retrieved 2016-09-07.
  40. 1 2 Schoen, John W. (2005-06-08). "Answer Desk: Is it a crime to burn money?". NBC News. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  41. http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/3mer/1ami/1999-1408.mer.ami.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  42. Brown, August (23 March 2009). "Living Things burn through dollars, sense". LA Times music blog. Retrieved 1 August 2009.
  43. Columbia Journalism Review: CNBC's Kudlow: On-Air Lawbreaker? March 19, 2009.
  44. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary (1989). The Flag Protection Act of 1989: report together with additional and minority views (to accompany S. 1338). Senate Report. Vol. 101–152. Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O. Reprinted in Curtis, Michael Kent (1993). The Constitution and the Flag: The flag burning cases. Vol. 2. p. 434.
  45. 415 U.S. 566 (1974)
  46. "Legal Tender". Archived from the original on 14 August 2009. Retrieved 4 August 2009.
  47. Canny, John; Paulos, Eric (2001). "Tele-Embodiment and Shattered Presence: Reconstructing the Body for Online Interaction". In Ken Goldberg (ed.). The Robot in the Garden. p. 283.
  48. Goldberg, Ken. "Legal Tender" . Retrieved 4 August 2009.
  49. Dreyfus, Hubert (2001). "Telepistemology: Descartes' Last Stand". In Ken Goldberg (ed.). The Robot in the Garden. p. 60.
  50. Restatement of Trusts, Second § 124 p.267, cited in Eyerman v. Mercantile Trust Co., 524 S.W.2d 210 (Mo. App. 1975) [ permanent dead link ] along with In re Scott's Will, 88 Minn. 386, 93 N. W. 109

Further reading

Commons-logo.svg Media related to Burning money at Wikimedia Commons