Orangemoody editing of Wikipedia

Last updated

On August 31, 2015, the English Wikipedia community discovered 381 sockpuppet accounts operating an undisclosed paid editing ring. Participants in the ring extorted money from mid-sized businesses who had articles about themselves rejected by the encyclopedia's "Articles for Creation" process, in which drafts are submitted for approval to experienced editors. The ring was nicknamed "Operation Orangemoody" after the first account uncovered in the sockpuppet investigation and was Wikipedia's biggest conflict-of-interest scandal as of June 2021, [1] [2] exceeding the scope of the Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia incident in which approximately 250 sockpuppets were found and blocked in 2013.

Contents

The story was reported by many English language and non-English language news sources, including Komsomolskaya Pravda , Le Temps , [3] Le Monde and Die Zeit . [4] [5] [6] The editing was described by various media as "black hat" editors ( TechCrunch ), [7] "dishonest editing" ( PC World ), [8] "extortion" [9] ( Wired ), [10] a "blackmail scam" ( The Independent ), [11] and an "extensive cybercrime syndicate" ( ThinkProgress ). [12]

History

In 2015, administrators of the English Wikipedia blocked 381 accounts, [13] [14] many of them suspected of being sockpuppets of the same group of people, after a two-month investigation launched by Wikipedia editors. [1] More than 200 Wikipedia articles created from the accounts were deleted. [15]

Wikipedia's resulting investigation, named "Orangemoody" after the first account uncovered, found that sockpuppets had searched the site for deleted or rejected articles about businesses and individuals. [16] Many of the articles had been deleted because of excessive promotional content. The editors, some posing as Wikipedia administrators, would then extort [17] payment from the businesses to publish and protect the articles. Besides businesses, individuals were targeted, including Cuban musician Dayramir González. [17] [18] The scammers themselves may have been involved in the deletion of some articles. [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese Wikipedia</span> Standard Chinese–language edition of Wikipedia

The Chinese Wikipedia is the written vernacular Chinese edition of Wikipedia. It is run by the Wikimedia Foundation. Started on 11 May 2001, the Chinese Wikipedia currently has 1,331,563 articles and 3,305,103 registered users, of whom 68 have administrative privileges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">German Wikipedia</span> German language edition of Wikipedia

The German Wikipedia is the German-language edition of Wikipedia, a free and publicly editable online encyclopedia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sock puppet account</span> Online identity used for purposes of deception

A sock puppet is defined as a person whose actions are controlled by another. It is a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock, and is often used to refer to alternative online identities or user accounts used for purposes of deception. Online, it came to be used to refer to a false identity assumed by a member of an internet community who spoke to, or about, themselves while pretending to be another person.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Wikipedia</span> Russian-language edition of Wikipedia

The Russian Wikipedia is the Russian-language edition of Wikipedia. As of January 2023, it has 1,887,224 articles. It was started on 11 May 2001. In October 2015, it became the sixth-largest Wikipedia by the number of articles. It has the sixth-largest number of edits (128 million). In June 2020, it was the world's 6th most visited language Wikipedia after the English Wikipedia, the Japanese Wikipedia, the Spanish Wikipedia, the German Wikipedia and the French Wikipedia.

Some edits to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia by staff of the United States Congress have created controversy, notably in early to mid-2006. Several such instances, such as those involving Marty Meehan, Norm Coleman, Conrad Burns, and Joe Biden, received significant media attention. Others, such as those involving Gil Gutknecht, were reported but received less widespread coverage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of Wikipedia</span>

Most criticism of Wikipedia has been directed toward its content, community of established users, and processes. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of the articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias. Concerns have also been raised about systemic bias along gender, racial, political, corporate, institutional, and national lines. In addition, conflicts of interest arising from corporate campaigns to influence content have also been highlighted. Further concerns include the vandalism and partisanship facilitated by anonymous editing, clique behavior, social stratification between a guardian class and newer users, excessive rule-making, edit warring, and uneven policy application.

Russian web brigades are state-sponsored anonymous Internet political commentators and trolls linked to the Government of Russia. Participants report that they are organized into teams and groups of commentators that participate in Russian and international political blogs and Internet forums using sockpuppets, social bots and large-scale orchestrated trolling and disinformation campaigns to promote pro-Putin and pro-Russian propaganda. Articles on the Russian Wikipedia concerning the MH17 crash and the Russo-Ukrainian War were targeted by Russian internet propaganda outlets. In June 2019 a group of 12 editors introducing coordinated pro-government and anti-opposition bias was blocked on the Russian-language Wikipedia. During the war by Russia against Ukraine in 2022, Kremlin trolls were still active on many social platforms and were spreading disinformation related to the war events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Block (Internet)</span> Restriction on accessing an online resource

On the Internet, a block or ban is a technical measure intended to restrict access to information or resources. Blocking and its inverse, unblocking, may be implemented by the owners of computers using software. Some countries, notably China and Singapore, block access to certain news information. In the United States, the Children's Internet Protection Act requires schools receiving federal funded discount rates for Internet access to install filter software that blocks obscene content, pornography, and, where applicable, content "harmful to minors".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japanese Wikipedia</span> Japanese-language edition of Wikipedia

The Japanese Wikipedia is the Japanese-language edition of Wikipedia, a free, open-source online encyclopedia. Started on 11 May 2001, the edition attained the 200,000 article mark in April 2006 and the 500,000 article mark in June 2008. As of January 2023, it has over 1,359,000 articles with 14,995 active contributors, ranking fourth behind the English, French and German editions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arbitration Committee</span> Dispute resolution panel of editors on several Wikimedia Foundation projects

On Wikimedia Foundation projects, an Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) is a binding dispute resolution panel of editors. Each of Wikimedia's projects are editorially autonomous and independent, and some of them have established their own ArbComs who work according rules developed by the project's editors and are usually annually elected by their communities. ArbComs generally address misconduct by administrators and editors with access to advanced tools, and a range of "real-world" issues related to harmful conduct that can arise in the context of a Wikimedia projects. Rulings, policies and procedures differ between projects depending on local and cultural contexts. According to the Wikimedia Terms of Use, users are not obliged to have a dispute solved by an ArbCom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vandalism on Wikipedia</span> Act of editing Wikipedia in a malicious manner

On Wikipedia, vandalism is editing the project in an intentionally disruptive or malicious manner. Vandalism includes any addition, removal, or modification that is intentionally humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, offensive, libelous or degrading in any way.

Widespread censorship of Wikipedia has occurred in countries including China, Iran, Myanmar, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela. Some instances are examples of widespread internet censorship in general that includes Wikipedia content. Others are indicative of measures to prevent the viewing of specific content deemed offensive. The length of different blocks have varied from hours to years. When Wikipedia ran on the HTTP protocol, governments were able to block specific articles. However, in 2011 Wikipedia began running on HTTPS as well and in 2015 switched over entirely. Since then, the only censorship options have been to block the entire site for a particular language or prosecute editors, which has resulted in some countries dropping their bans and others expanding their bans to the entire site. Wikipedia has been blocked in China since 23 April 2019 and in Myanmar since 21 February 2021.

Conflict-of-interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia occurs when editors use Wikipedia to advance the interests of their external roles or relationships. The type of COI editing of most concern on Wikipedia is paid editing for public relations (PR) purposes. Several Wikipedia policies and guidelines exist to combat conflict of interest editing, including Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikipediocracy</span> Website for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia

Wikipediocracy is a website for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia. Its members have brought information about Wikipedia's controversies to the attention of the media. The site was founded in March 2012 by users of Wikipedia Review, another site critical of Wikipedia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiki-PR editing of Wikipedia</span> Consulting firm that commercially edits Wikipedia

Wiki-PR is a consulting firm that formerly marketed the ability to edit Wikipedia by "...directly edit[ing] your page using our network of established Wikipedia editors and admin[s]".

Status Labs is a digital reputation management company based in Austin, Texas. It was founded in 2012 by Darius Fisher, Jordan French, and Jesse Boskoff. The firm has been hired by various clients to hide unfavorable news from Internet search results.

Ashley Feinberg is an American journalist, covering politics, media, and technology. She is known for her internet sleuthing, through which she has uncovered information about the online activity of public figures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deletion of articles on Wikipedia</span>

Volunteer editors of Wikipedia delete articles on the online encyclopedia on a regular basis, following processes that have been formulated by the site's community over time. The most common route is outright deletion of articles that are clearly in violation of rules of the website. Other mechanisms include an intermediate collaborative process that bypasses a full discussion, and full discussion at the dedicated forum called Articles for deletion (AfD). As a technical action, deletion can only be carried out by a subset of editors who have been assigned particular technical privileges by the community, called administrators. A deletion that has been carried out can be contested by appeal to the deleting administrator, or on another discussion board called Deletion review (DRV).

From 2012 to 2022, Zhemao, an editor of the Chinese Wikipedia, created over 200 interconnected articles about falsified aspects of medieval Russian history in one of Wikipedia's largest hoaxes. Combining research and fantasy, the articles were fictive embellishments on real entities, as Zhemao used machine translation to understand Russian-language sources and invented elaborate detail to fill gaps in the translation. She started this practice as early as 2010 on Chinese history topics, but turned to Russian history in 2012, and the political interactions of medieval Slavic states in particular. Many of her hoax articles were created to fill detail in her initial fabrications. Zhemao eluded detection for over a decade by obtaining the community's trust: faking a persona as a Russian history scholar, using sockpuppet accounts to feign support, and exploiting the community's good faith that her obscure sources matched the article content.

References

  1. 1 2 Moyer, Justin Wm. "Wikipedia sting snares hundreds of accounts used for paid editing". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved February 8, 2021.
  2. "Wikipedia's biggest scandal: Industrial-scale blackmail". The Register . September 3, 2015.
  3. "Victime de fraude et d'extorsion, Wikipédia ferme 381 comptes de faux contributeurs". Le Temps (in French). Switzerland. September 1, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  4. Саша ПЯТНИЦКАЯ (Sasha Pyatnitskaya) (September 1, 2015). "Англоязычная Wikipedia заблокировала более 380 редакторов за "корыстные" правки" [The English Wikipedia has blocked more than 380 editors for "selfish" edits]. Komsomolskaya Pravda (in Russian).
  5. "381 comptes de Wikipédia bannis pour extorsion". Le Monde (in French). Paris. September 2, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  6. "Wikipedia: Schutzgelderpressung in der Online-Enzyklopädie" [Wikipedia: protection racket in the online encyclopedia]. Zeit Online (in German). Die Zeit. September 1, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  7. Perez, Sarah (September 1, 2015), "Wikipedia Bans Hundreds Of "Black Hat" Paid Editors Who Created Promotional Pages On Its Site", TechCrunch , retrieved September 6, 2015
  8. Ribeiro, John (September 1, 2015). "Wikipedia bans 381 user accounts for dishonest editing". PC World . Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  9. Chiel, Ethan (September 1, 2015). "Wikipedia editors just banned 381 accounts over a huge fraud and extortion scandal". Fusion TV. Archived from the original on September 5, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  10. Cuplan, Daniel (September 1, 2015). "381 Wikipedia "sockpuppet" accounts banned for paid promotion". Wired (UK). Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  11. 1 2 Merrill, Jamie (September 2, 2015). "Wikipedia 'rogue editors' have targeted hundreds of people in a blackmail scam". The Independent . Archived from the original on September 13, 2015. Retrieved September 7, 2017 via WebCite.
  12. Williams, Lauren C. (September 4, 2015). "Wikipedia Editors Uncover Extortion Scam And Extensive Cybercrime Syndicate". ThinkProgress . Archived from the original on July 26, 2016. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  13. Pearson, Jordan (September 1, 2015). "Hundreds of Wikipedia Accounts Got Banned for Secretly Promoting Brands". Vice . Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  14. Kravets, David (September 1, 2015). "Wikipedia blocks hundreds of linked accounts for suspect editing". Ars Technica . Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  15. Dredge, Stuart (6 September 2015). "Wikipedia founder backs site's systems after extortion scam". The Guardian . Retrieved September 9, 2015.
  16. King, Robin Levinson (September 2, 2015). "Wikipedia bans users for not disclosing they got paid to edit articles". The Toronto Star . Retrieved September 10, 2015.
  17. 1 2 Weaver, Matthew (2 September 2015). "Wikipedia blocks editor accounts linked to extortion scam". The Guardian. Retrieved September 9, 2015.
  18. Coolman, Robert (September 5, 2015). "I Was Shaken Down by Wikipedia's Blackmail Bandits". The Daily Beast . Retrieved September 6, 2015.