Pro-EU leaflet

Last updated

The front cover of the leaflet Pro-EU Leaflet.pdf
The front cover of the leaflet

"Why the Government Believes That Voting to Remain in the European Union is the Best Decision for the UK" (also known as the pro-EU leaflet, the EU leaflet, or the Brexit leaflet) was a one-off pamphlet created in April 2016 by the government of the United Kingdom. The leaflet was created in anticipation of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum in June, which would ask the British public whether the UK should leave the EU. After internal polling revealed that 85 per cent of the public wanted more information before making their decision, Prime Minister David Cameron announced that the government would send a leaflet to households across the UK, explaining why remaining in the EU was the best choice for the UK. The leaflets were paid for by British taxpayers at a cost of £9.3 million, and were delivered across the UK in two waves: the first to households in England, and the second to households in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The 16-page leaflet warns the British public that Brexit would increase the cost of living in the UK, [1] damage living standards, [2] and lead to "a decade or more of uncertainty". [3] [4] The pamphlet provoked immediate outrage from individuals and organisations that were campaigning to leave. Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, criticised the government for spending taxpayers' money on the leaflet, calling it "crazy" and "a complete waste of money", [5] while Vote Leave, the referendum's official campaign in favour of leaving the EU, accused Cameron of creating the pamphlet to distract media headlines away from his involvement in the Panama Papers scandal. [6]

The Brexit referendum was held on 23 June, with 51.89 per cent of the votes cast being in favour of leaving the EU. After almost four years of negotiations on the terms of departure and on future relations, the UK formally left the EU on 31 January 2020.

In February 2019, an analysis of the impact on the British public of exposure to the leaflet concluded that it had led to a decrease of three percentage points in the probability of an individual voting to leave in the referendum.

Background

The EU membership referendum was called by Prime Minister David Cameron. Prime Minister David Cameron - official photograph (8947770804) (cropped).jpg
The EU membership referendum was called by Prime Minister David Cameron.

During the Conservative Party's campaign in the 2015 general election, Prime Minister David Cameron pledged in their manifesto to hold a straight in-out referendum on the UK's membership of the EU by the end of 2017. [8] The Conservatives won 330 seats in the House of Commons in May that year, giving them a working majority of 12 seats. [9] Following this, Cameron reiterated his commitment to holding a referendum, which was included in the Queen's Speech on 27 May 2015. [10]

On 20 February 2016, Cameron declared that the referendum would be held on 23 June that year, and that he would be campaigning for Britain to remain. [7] After internal polling revealed that 85% of the British public wanted more information before they made their decision, on 6 April the government announced that it would send a leaflet to households across the UK, explaining why remaining in the EU was the best choice for the UK. [11] Writing in 2019, Harry Pickard of the University of Sheffield summarised the government's motivation by stating: "A clear majority of economists and the UK government had warned that leaving the EU would depress the economy and create a lengthy period of uncertainty, and the Government was keen to convey their stance to voters." [12]

The leaflets were paid for by the British taxpayers at a cost of £9.3 million, of which £458,500 was used for production, £5,947,436 for printing and delivering, and £2,894,064 on the accompanying website and digital promotion. [13] Sent to a total of 27 million households, the leaflets therefore cost 34p per household. [14] The leaflets were printed by the British printing company Williams Lea, [15] and were delivered by Royal Mail in two waves. The first wave was sent to households in England between 11 and 13 April, [16] two to four days before the official regulated ten-week campaigning period began on 15 April. [17] The second wave of leaflets were delivered to households in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland after their devolved government elections, in the week beginning 9 May. [18]

The Brexit referendum was held on 23 June, with 51.89% of the votes cast being in favour of leaving the EU. [19] The following day, after the results became known, Cameron announced that he would resign from the office of prime minister. [20] After almost four years of negotiations on the terms of departure and on future relations, the UK formally left the EU at 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020. [21]

Contents

Using a photograph of the Port of Felixstowe similar to the above as illustration, the leaflet argues that "a vote to leave could mean a decade or more of uncertainty". Aerial view of the Port of Felixstowe.jpg
Using a photograph of the Port of Felixstowe similar to the above as illustration, the leaflet argues that "a vote to leave could mean a decade or more of uncertainty".

Including its front and back covers, the leaflet is 16 pages long. Each two-page spread features three columns of text on the left page and a large colour photograph on the right. The pages of the leaflet cover six sections, the first of which details the importance of the Brexit decision, and how it will "affect you, your family and your children for decades to come". [22] [23] The second covers the economic strengths of remaining in the EU—such as the three million jobs "linked to exports to the EU" [11] —and warns that leaving the EU could risk higher unemployment. [2]

The third section lists how EU membership improves British lives. It warns that Brexit would increase the cost of living in the UK, [1] and damage living standards. [2] It also warns that leaving the EU risks higher prices of household goods, [11] and would put pressure on the value of the pound. [24] Reviewing these claims, Andrew Glencross of the University of Stirling said that there were "good reasons" to accept their logic. [25]

The fourth section of the pamphlet lists the uncertainties that Brexit would cause and warns that "a vote to leave could mean a decade or more of uncertainty". [3] [4] Economics journalist Faisal Islam responded to this particular claim by saying "It could, or it could not", as there was "no precedent" for Brexit. [26] This section is illustrated by an image of the Port of Felixstowe, taken by the photographer Mike Page. [27] On learning that his photo had been used without permission, Page—a Eurosceptic—described himself as "livid". [28]

The final two sections of the leaflet detail the risks of that Brexit would bring to controlling immigration and to border security, [29] and the benefits of membership of the EU. Writing for The Conversation , Lindsay Aqui of Queen Mary University of London noted that the section on immigration marked how the debate over Britain's place in Europe had changed since the previous referendum in 1975. [29]

Reactions

News of the government's decision to send households the leaflet was announced on 6 April 2016, and immediately provoked outrage from individuals and organisations who were campaigning to leave. [4] In an interview with ITV News, Mayor of London Boris Johnson criticised the government for spending taxpayers' money on the leaflet, calling it "crazy" and "a complete waste of money", [5] while the Conservative MP Peter Bone similarly called the decision to spend taxpayers' money on the pamphlet "outrageous". [15] Members of the British public who supported Brexit took to Twitter to urge people to deface and return the leaflets to Cameron and the Conservative Party, [30] with the MP Liam Fox saying that he was going to "going to stick [the leaflet] in an envelope addressed to Number 10". [31]

Speaking on behalf of Vote Leave, the referendum's official campaign in favour of leaving the EU, Rob Oxley accused Cameron of creating the leaflet to distract media headlines away from the Panama Papers scandal, which included allegations that he used offshore banking systems. [6] [11] Speaking at a Q&A at the University of Exeter, Cameron defended his decision to produce the leaflet, stating that his government was "not neutral" on the issue, and warned that Brexit would be "bad for our economy, bad for jobs, bad for investment, bad for families' finances". [32] Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond also defended the pamphlet, saying that the government had no intention of undermining the official campaigns of the referendum. [33]

Hours after news of the pamphlet broke, a petition against it—launched on the UK Parliament petitions website on 22 December 2015 by Jayne Adye, director of the Eurosceptic group Get Britain Out [34] —grew significantly in popularity, and had received over 100,000 signatures by 8 April, triggering Parliament to debate the topic on 9 May. [35] The petition was closed on 23 June, the day of the referendum, having ultimately been signed by 221,866 people. [36] As of January 2017, it was the 13th most-signed petition ever on the website. [37]

Analysis

Political scientist Simon Hix described the leaflet as "quite an effective piece of rhetoric". Simon-hix-pollwatch-2014-launch.jpg
Political scientist Simon Hix described the leaflet as "quite an effective piece of rhetoric".

Analysis of the contents of the leaflet was provided by several independent sources. Anand Menon, director of UK in a Changing Europe—a UK-wide network of researchers and academics—described the leaflet as "factual but partial". Menon explained, for example, that, while it was "probably true" that exports of the EU were linked to more than three million jobs, he did not believe that these jobs would necessarily cease to exist after Brexit. [38] Writing for The Conversation, Glencross felt that it focused exclusively on the benefits of UK–EU cooperation "at an institutional level", and that it did not convey a message about the present-day purpose of integration with Europe. [25] Economics professor Jonathan Portes described the pamphlet as "a mixture of facts, fair points, some dubious assertions and straw men", while political scientist Simon Hix said that, in his opinion, it was "quite an effective piece of rhetoric". [38]

The independent British charity Full Fact performed fifteen fact checks on the leaflet, and concluded that, while it did not attempt to be even-handed, much of the information it contained was accurate. [39] Academic and media commentator Richard G. Whitman felt that the leaflet's contents did not elaborate on issues related to security, despite Cameron's having pushed hard on the argument. [38] Chris Giles of the Financial Times said that the pamphlet was honest in its ambition, and compared its claims favourably to those made by the referendum's official campaigns, Vote Leave and Britain Stronger in Europe. [40] Itemised analyses of the claims in the leaflet were conducted by both BBC News and The Guardian . [41] [42]

Impact

The impact of the leaflet on voting intentions was researched by Harry Pickard of the University of Sheffield and published in 2019. [43] Using a sample of 6,132 individuals from across the UK, Pickard concluded that being exposed to the leaflet led to a three percentage point decrease in the probability of a person's voting to leave in the referendum. [44] This effect was particularly strong among groups that had been exposed to few other sources of information about the referendum, such as women (8.8 percentage points less likely to vote to leave following exposure to the leaflet), those on low incomes (11.4 percentage points), and the risk averse (10.2 percentage points). [45]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom</span> Criticism/Opposition to the European Union in the United Kingdom

Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom is a continuum of belief ranging from the opposition to certain political policies of the European Union to the complete opposition to the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union. It has been a significant element in the politics of the United Kingdom (UK). A 2009 Eurobarometer survey of EU citizens showed support for membership of the EU was lowest in the United Kingdom, alongside Latvia and Hungary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum</span>

On 23 June 2016, a referendum, commonly referred to as the EU referendum or the Brexit referendum, took place in the United Kingdom (UK) and Gibraltar to ask the electorate whether the country should remain a member of, or leave, the European Union (EU). It was organised and facilitated through the European Union Referendum Act 2015 and the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The referendum resulted in 51.9% of the votes cast being in favour of leaving the EU. The referendum was legally non-binding due to the ancient principle of parliamentary sovereignty as the enabling legislation only specified that a referendum should be held; however, the Conservative government of the time which was led by the then Prime Minister David Cameron promised to implement the result, beginning the process of the country's withdrawal from the EU commonly termed "Brexit".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brexit</span> UK withdrawal from the European Union (2020)

Brexit was the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU). It officially took place at 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020. The UK is the only sovereign country to have left the EU. The UK had been a member state of the EU or its predecessor, the European Communities (EC), since 1 January 1973. Following Brexit, EU law and the Court of Justice of the European Union no longer have primacy over British laws. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 retains relevant EU law as domestic law, which the UK can amend or repeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 European Parliament election in the United Kingdom</span> 2019 election of members of the European Parliament for the United Kingdom

The 2019 European Parliament election was the United Kingdom's component of the 2019 European Parliament election, held on Thursday 23 May 2019 and the results were announced on Sunday 26 and Monday 27 May 2019, after all the other EU countries had voted. This was the United Kingdom's final participation in a European Parliament election before leaving the European Union on 31 January 2020, and was also the last election to be held under the provisions of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 before its repeal under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vote Leave</span> Organization that campaigned for UK withdrawal from the EU

Vote Leave was a campaigning organisation that supported a "Leave" vote in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. On 13 April 2016 it was designated by the Electoral Commission as the official campaign in favour of leaving the European Union in the Referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum</span>

The referendum on EU membership took place on 23 June 2016. Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum was ongoing in the months between the announcement of a referendum and the referendum polling day. Polls on the general principle of the UK's membership of the European Union were carried out for a number of years prior to the referendum. Opinion polls of voters in general tended to show roughly equal proportions in favour of remaining and leaving. Polls of business leaders, scientists, and lawyers showed majorities in favour of remaining. Among non-British citizens in other EU member states, polling suggested that a majority were in favour of the UK remaining in the EU in principle, but that a similarly sized majority believed that if the UK were only able to remain in the EU on renegotiated terms then it should leave.

A number of politicians, public figures, newspapers and magazines, businesses and other organisations endorsed either the United Kingdom remaining in the EU or the United Kingdom leaving the EU during the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaigning in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum</span> Public outreach by politicians in the lead-up to Brexit

Campaigning in the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum began unofficially on 20 February 2016 when Prime Minister David Cameron formally announced under the terms of the European Union Referendum Act 2015 that a referendum would be held on the issue of the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union. The official campaign period for the 2016 referendum ran from 15 April 2016 until the day of the poll on 23 June 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proposed second Scottish independence referendum</span> Possible future referendum

A second referendum on independence from the United Kingdom (UK) has been proposed by the Scottish Government. An independence referendum was first held on 18 September 2014, with 55% voting "No" to independence. The Scottish Government stated in its white paper for independence that voting Yes was a "once in a generation opportunity to follow a different path, and choose a new and better direction for our nation". Following the "No" vote, the cross party Smith Commission proposed areas that could be devolved to the Scottish Parliament; this led to the passing of the Scotland Act 2016, formalising new devolved policy areas in time for the 2016 Scottish Parliament election campaign.

After the British EU membership referendum held on 23 June 2016, in which a majority voted to leave the European Union, the United Kingdom experienced political and economic upsets, with spillover effects across the rest of the European Union and the wider world. Prime Minister David Cameron, who had campaigned for Remain, announced his resignation on 24 June, triggering a Conservative leadership election, won by Home Secretary Theresa May. Following Leader of the Opposition Jeremy Corbyn's loss of a motion of no confidence among the Parliamentary Labour Party, he also faced a leadership challenge, which he won. Nigel Farage stepped down from leadership of the pro-Leave party UKIP in July. After the elected party leader resigned, Farage then became the party's interim leader on 5 October until Paul Nuttall was elected leader on 28 November.

The result in favour of Brexit of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum is one of the most significant political events for Britain during the 21st century. The debate provoked major consideration to an array of topics, argued up-to, and beyond, the referendum on 23 June 2016. The referendum was originally conceived by David Cameron as a means to defeat the anti-EU faction within his own party by having it fail, but he misjudged the level of public support for leaving, particularly amongst Labour Party voters. Factors included sovereignty, immigration, the economy and anti-establishment politics, amongst various other influences. The result of the referendum was that 51.8% of the votes were in favour of leaving the European Union. The formal withdrawal from the EU took place at 23:00 on 31 January 2020, almost three years after Theresa May triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on 29 March 2017. This page provides an overarching analysis of the different arguments which were presented by both the Leave and Remain campaigns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union</span> Invocation of the EUs withdrawal process for "Brexit"

On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom (UK) invoked Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) which began the member state's withdrawal, commonly known as Brexit, from the European Union (EU). In compliance with the TEU, the UK gave formal notice to the European Council of its intention to withdraw from the EU to allow withdrawal negotiations to begin.

A by-election for the House of Commons constituency of Sleaford and North Hykeham in Lincolnshire, England, was held on 8 December 2016. It was triggered by the resignation of the Conservative member of parliament (MP) Stephen Phillips, who left Parliament on 4 November 2016 due to policy differences with the Conservative government led by the prime minister, Theresa May, over Brexit – the British withdrawal from the European Union (EU). The Conservatives nominated Caroline Johnson, a paediatrician, to replace Phillips; she won the by-election with more than 50 per cent of the vote, a sizable majority. The Conservatives' vote share fell slightly compared to the result at the previous general election in 2015.

The effect of Brexit on Gibraltar concerns the status of Gibraltar after the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union ("Brexit"). The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020, having formally notified the EU in March 2017 of its intention to do so. Gibraltar is not part of the UK, but unlike all other British Overseas Territories, it was a part of the European Union along with the UK. It participated in the Brexit referendum and it ceased, by default, to be a part of the EU upon the UK's withdrawal.

Brexit is the commonly used term for the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union on 31 January 2020, which resulted from a referendum on 23 June 2016. This article details the mostly critical response to this decision in the visual art, novels, theatre, and film.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom membership of the European Union</span> Period of the United Kingdom being a member state of the European Union

The United Kingdom was a member state of the European Union (EU) and of its predecessor the European Communities (EC) – principally the European Economic Community (EEC) from 1 January 1973 until 31 January 2020. Since the foundation of the EEC, the UK had been an important neighbour and then leading member state, until Brexit ended 47 years of membership. During the UK's time as a member state two referendums were held on the issue of its membership, with the first being held on 5 June 1975, resulting in a vote to stay in the EC, and the second, held on 23 June 2016, which resulted in the vote to leave the EU.

Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum is a debated subject and remains unproven, though multiple sources argue evidence exists demonstrating that the Russian government attempted to influence British public opinion in favour of leaving the European Union. Investigations into this subject have been undertaken by the UK Electoral Commission, the UK Parliament's Culture Select Committee and Intelligence and Security Committee, and the United States Senate. "The Russia Report" published by the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament in July 2020 did not specifically address the Brexit campaign, but it concluded that Russian interference in UK politics is commonplace. It also found substantial evidence that there had been interference in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.

Since the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum, a number of demonstrations have taken place and organisations formed whose goal has been to oppose, reverse or otherwise impede that decision.

Brexit was the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union at 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020. As of 2020, the UK is the only sovereign country to have left the EU. Britain's membership of the EU began on 1 January 1973, when it entered the European Communities (EC), the predecessor to the EU. Following this, Eurosceptic groups formed in the UK, opposing aspects of both the EC and the EU. In January 2013, Prime Minister David Cameron delivered a speech at Bloomberg London, in which he called for reform of the EU and promised an in–out referendum on the UK's membership if the Conservative Party won a majority at the 2015 general election. The Conservatives won 330 seats at the election, giving Cameron a majority of 12, and a bill to hold a referendum was introduced to Parliament that month.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saqib Bhatti</span> British Conservative politician

Mohammad Saqib Bhatti is a British Conservative Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for Meriden since the 2019 general election. He currently serves as Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Tech and the Digital Economy since November 2023. He previously served as the Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party for Business.

References

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 Mayes, Joe; Atkinson, Andrew (9 April 2021). "100 Days of Brexit: Was It as Bad as 'Project Fear' Warned?" . New York City: Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 24 August 2022.(subscription required)
  2. 1 2 3 Glenday, John (7 April 2016). "Brexit campaigners tear into UK government's £9.3m pro-EU leaflet drop". The Drum. London. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 Stewart, Heather; Mason, Rowena (7 April 2016). "EU referendum: £9m taxpayer-funded publicity blitz pushes case to remain". The Guardian . London. ISSN   1756-3224. OCLC   1149244233. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Mason, Rowena; Stewart, Heather; Grierson, Jamie (7 April 2016). "£9m pro-EU leaflet is necessary and right, says Cameron". The Guardian . London. ISSN   1756-3224. OCLC   1149244233. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  5. 1 2 Steerpike (7 April 2016). "Boris Johnson blasts government's £9m EU leaflets: 'it's a complete waste of money'". The Spectator . London: Press Holdings. ISSN   0038-6952. OCLC   1766325. Archived from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  6. 1 2 Grierson, Jamie (7 April 2016). "No 10 defends timing of pro-EU leaflets announcement amid pressure on PM". The Guardian . London. ISSN   1756-3224. OCLC   1149244233. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  7. 1 2 "EU referendum: Cameron sets June date for UK vote". London: BBC News. 20 February 2016. Archived from the original on 30 August 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  8. "Timeline: Campaigns for a European Union referendum". BBC News. 21 May 2015. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  9. Parker, George (8 May 2015). "It is 1992 all over again for David Cameron's Conservatives". Financial Times . Archived from the original on 10 May 2015.
  10. "Queen's Speech 2015: EU referendum, tax freeze and right-to-buy". London: BBC News. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Landale, James (7 April 2016). "EU referendum: Government to spend £9m on leaflets to every home". London: BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  12. Pickard 2019, p. 2.
  13. "Government's £9.3m pro-EU leaflet under fire from Brexit campaigners". The Yorkshire Post . Leeds: Yorkshire Post. 6 April 2016. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  14. "EU referendum: PM 'makes no apology' for £9m EU leaflets". London: BBC News. 7 April 2016. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  15. 1 2 Wright, Oliver (6 April 2016). "EU referendum: Government to spend £9m of taxpayers' money on leaflets warning of 'damage' Brexit would cause". The Independent . London: Independent Digital News & Media. ISSN   0951-9467. OCLC   185201487. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  16. Belam, Martin (11 April 2016). "Criticism over pro-EU leaflet on Facebook". The Guardian . London. ISSN   1756-3224. OCLC   1149244233. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  17. James, Sam Burne (13 April 2016). "Vote Leave named official Brexit campaign and Stronger In confirmed as pro-EU group" . PRWeek . London: Haymarket. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.(subscription required)
  18. "PM: 'No Apology' For £9.3m Pro-EU Leaflets". London: Sky News. 7 April 2016. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  19. "EU Referendum Results". London: Sky News. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016.
  20. Hughes, Laura (30 June 2016). "EU referendum live: David Cameron resigns as UK shocks the world by voting for Brexit" . The Daily Telegraph . London. ISSN   0307-1235. OCLC   49632006. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016.(subscription required)
  21. "Brexit: New era for UK as it completes separation from European Union". London: BBC News. 1 January 2021. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  22. Poole, Oli (15 April 2016). "From the business desk: Government's EU leaflet does not inform debate". Sussex Express . Johnston. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  23. Corr, Philip (3 May 2016). "The psychology of Brexit – and how it could swing the vote". The Conversation . Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  24. Dominiczak, Peter (6 April 2016). "EU referendum: £9m cost of taxpayer-funded leaflet warning about the 'damage' of Brexit angers Eurosceptics" . The Daily Telegraph . London. ISSN   0307-1235. OCLC   49632006. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.(subscription required)
  25. 1 2 Glencross, Andrew (15 April 2016). "Fact Check special: government leaflet that makes case for Britain staying in the EU". The Conversation . Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  26. Islam, Faisal (7 April 2016). "What's in the EU Leaflet and Is It True?". London: Sky News. Archived from the original on 11 November 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2022.
  27. Dickson, Annabelle (12 April 2016). "Eurosceptic East Anglian photographer 'livid' after picture appears without permission in government's £9m pro-EU brochure". Eastern Daily Press . Norwich: Archant. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023.
  28. Wilkinson, Michael (12 April 2016). "Brexit supporter 'livid' after his photo appears in Government's pro-EU leaflet without permission" . The Daily Telegraph . London. ISSN   0307-1235. OCLC   49632006. Archived from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 9 February 2021.(subscription required)
  29. 1 2 Aqui, Lindsay (18 April 2016). "Government pro-Europe leaflet didn't swing voters in 1975 – and probably won't in 2016". The Conversation . Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  30. Stewart, Rebecca (12 April 2016). "Brexit supporters deface and return government's £9.3m pro-EU leaflet on Twitter". The Drum. London. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  31. Wilson, Jeremy (7 April 2016). "The government spent £9 million warning that Brexit could make phone calls 38p more expensive". Business Insider . Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  32. Staunton, Denis (7 April 2016). "David Cameron defends £9m Brexit mailshot". The Irish Times . Dublin: Irish Times. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022. Retrieved 23 October 2022.
  33. McCann, Kate (7 April 2016). "Tories at war over EU 'propaganda' leaflet as MPs threaten to 'grind Government to a halt' in protest at David Cameron" . The Daily Telegraph . London. ISSN   0307-1235. OCLC   49632006. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.(subscription required)
  34. Forster, Katie (13 June 2016). "EU referendum: Government to spend £9m of taxpayers' money on leaflets warning of 'damage' Brexit would cause". The Independent . London: Independent Digital News & Media. ISSN   0951-9467. OCLC   185201487. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  35. "Petition to stop pro-EU leaflets gets 100,000 backers". BBC News. 8 April 2016. Archived from the original on 25 November 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2022.
  36. Clark, Morris & Lomax 2018, p. 346.
  37. "What are the 10 most-signed petitions and what have they achieved?". ITV News. 31 January 2017. Archived from the original on 12 January 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  38. 1 2 3 4 Various (8 April 2016). "Response to Government leaflet from the UK in a Changing Europe". London: UK in a Changing Europe. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  39. "The government's EU leaflet: introduction". London: Full Fact. 8 May 2016. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  40. Giles, Chris (7 April 2016). "FT verdict: The government's Brexit leaflet" . Financial Times . London: Nikkei. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.(subscription required)
  41. Reuben, Anthony; Kovacevic, Tamara (7 April 2016). "Reality Check: The government's referendum leaflet". London: BBC News. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  42. Walker, Peter; Arnett, George (7 April 2016). "Government's pro-EU leaflet: do its claims stack up?". The Guardian . London. ISSN   1756-3224. OCLC   1149244233. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  43. Pickard 2019, p. 1.
  44. Pickard 2019, p. 17.
  45. Pickard 2019, p. 20.

Sources