Rio Grande sucker

Last updated

Rio Grande sucker
BacaFish.JPG
Rio Grande sucker in Baca National Wildlife Refuge
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Order: Cypriniformes
Family: Catostomidae
Genus: Catostomus
Species:
C. plebeius
Binomial name
Catostomus plebeius
Baird & Girard, 1854
Synonyms [1]

Pantosteus plebeius

C. bernardini (center) has morphologic similarities to C. plebeius and inhabits regions of the Southwestern United States Catostomus bernardini.jpg
C. bernardini (center) has morphologic similarities to C. plebeius and inhabits regions of the Southwestern United States

The Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius) is a North American freshwater fish in the family Catostomidae. It has a typical bottom-feeding phenotype and fills lower trophic levels alongside Rio Grande cutthroat trout and Rio Grande chub species. [3] It is smaller sized in comparison to its other family members, with females being the larger between sexes. Coloration tends to benefit the species due to counter-shading patterns. It is endemic to the Rio Grande basin and was once common throughout. The species has maintained a population in New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, and Northern Mexico, but has faced challenges from the pressure of non-native species, habitat loss, degradation, and a variety of other aquatic ecosystem changes. [4] There is current pressure from environmental organizations to federally list the species as threatened or endangered. [5]

Contents

Taxonomy

The scientific name of the Rio Grande sucker is Catostomus plebeius. [6] The etymology of the name “Catostomus” is Greek, kata = down + Greek, stoma = mouth, which is suggestive of the subterminal mouth orientation. Species name “plebeius” is Latin, belonging to the plebes, or of lower class, commonality. Part of Kingdom Animalia, which encompasses all animals that are multicellular heterotrophs. [7] Fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals fall under the Phylum Chordata which have common morphological characteristics consisting of a notochord, nerve cord, visceral clefts, and arches. [8] Belonging to Class Actinopterygii, or ray-finned fishes, which are the most common and prosperous freshwater and marine fishes. [9]  There are three infraclasses to Actinopterygii, in which Teleostei contains the majority of species and includes common fishes such as trout, salmon, flounders, and catfish. [10]  A unique feature to superorder Ostariophysi is the Weberian apparatus, a bony connection between the swim bladder and auditory system. [11] The Rio Grande sucker is part of Order Cypriniformes, which include all suckers and minnows. The sucker family, Catostomidae, has populations of different species distributed globally and features similar feeding and spawning characteristics. [12]

Description

Four Rio Grande suckers in breeding color, photographed in the East Fork of the Jemez River Rio Grande suckers in breeding colors.jpg
Four Rio Grande suckers in breeding color, photographed in the East Fork of the Jemez River

A smaller member of the family Catostomidae with typical lengths <170 mm (6.7 in). Records indicate that males tend to be smaller than females with one study citing the oldest male captured reached 134 mm (5.3 in) and oldest female was 169 mm (6.7 in). [3] The Rio Grande sucker is distinguished from other members of the genus Catostomus by coloration, head and body shape as well as fins and sexual differences. [4] The head has a broad snout, ventral mouth, thick fleshy lower lip with a deep cleft on each side, and has a cartilaginous ridge of the mandible that is slightly convex. The mouth is fleshy, subterminal, and protractile. A single row of approximately 23 bifurcated pharyngeal teeth exist. [4] Typical body shape is spindle or rod-shaped (terete) with flattening from dorsal to ventral side. The dorsal and lateral sides of the body are brownish green to dusky brown with darker blotches. Breeding males develop bright red lateral stripes. [13] Ventral portions are accentuated by pale and mottled colors leading to a silvery dusky abdominal region. The caudal peduncle is deeper than other members of the genus and the rays are pigmented. Fins contain a range of these rays, the dorsal fin usually has 8-10, pectorals 14-15, pelvic 8-10, and anal fins usually have 7. [3] The dorsal fin is short and triangular, pectorals are bluntly pointed, pelvic fins are oval, and the anal fin is elongated to the base of the caudal fin which is deeply forked. [14]

Life history

The occurrence of spawning is very closely related to water flows and temperature, thus variability throughout the year exists. [15] Peak spawning is typically seen after high flows have occurred, and water tends to be between 51–61 °F (11–16 °C). [16] The highest flows also coincide with spring snowmelt and cooler water temperatures which demonstrate the wide range in the reproductive period, February – June, and occasionally in Autumn months. [5] Food resources also influence breeding. [15] Egg deposition is preferred on clean, gravel substrate. Collection of ova and larva have shown variability in size ranging from 0.5 -1.5mm and around 2mm, respectively. [13]  Sexual maturity can happen from 1-3 years of age depending on food resources and body size. [3] Breeding colors are often more dramatic for males than females and tuberculation occurs on both sexes but is distributed differently around the body. Females tend to have tubercles on the caudal peduncle, where males tuberculate on the anal and caudal fins. [14]

Feeding

Mouth morphology dictates feeding strategies within the lower trophic level niche, and like most species within the subgenus, are largely algivorous but will predate on aquatic invertebrates early within their lifecycle. [4] This is due to incomplete ventral migration of the mouth in young of the year, 0-1 years of age, which necessitates a more omnivorous feeding pattern at this life stage. [17] Once the cartilaginous ridge develops it is used for scraping algae or periphyton from rocks, gravel, and other benthic substrates. [14] Sedimentation, competition, and flow can all negatively affect the diet of C. plebeius by depleting primary productivity and food availability. [18]

Range

Rio Grande river basin RioGrandeRiverMapNM.png
Rio Grande river basin

The southwestern area of the United States has historically held endemic populations in the Rio Grande River and its tributaries, but these have been substantially decreased due to land use, habitat loss, environmental degradation and non-native competition. [14]  The Rio Grande sucker has been extirpated from a large portion of its natural range and current populations are much smaller but continue to persist in far Southern Colorado, the Rio Grande basin in New Mexico, Eastern Arizona, and Northern Mexico. [3] [14] The Arizona populations are introduced and established. [6] Major studies of population densities and have occurred primarily in New Mexico. These suggest that the majority of its current range is within waterways of the Santa Fe and Carson National Forests. [19]

Habitat

Rio Grande sucker is found in small to large, middle elevation streams and rivers. [19] As an obligate riverine species, [19] the strong correlation between river gradient and populations was hypothesized by (White, 1972), as populations tend to be associated with slower-moving water. [17] A study conducted in Hot Creek, Colorado shows a positive correlation between low turbidity and high aquatic vegetation levels. Stream characteristics such as riffles and glides also had higher levels of Rio Grande sucker. [18] Some studies have shown that glides and pools are the preferred habitat for the adult species and riffles may only fill the spawning life history stage. [20] In-stream large woody debris, clean clear pools, unsorted substrates, and riffles and runs are associated with populations in the Rio Grande Basin of Colorado. [13] However, (Rees and Miller, 2005), emphasize a lack of knowledge about habitat that is positively correlated and suitable for C. plebeius. Negative correlations with species abundance and fine particulate are also noted. [20] What is known, is that human impact on the environment and modification to historically occupied rivers and streams has resulted in habitat destruction. [3] Dramatic changes in the natural structure of the Rio Grande river have occurred with almost complete agricultural diversion and allocation of its average annual flow. [21]

Conservation and invasive species

Non-native competition from the White Sucker has disrupted C. plebeius populations White Sucker, Catostomus commersonii.jpg
Non-native competition from the White Sucker has disrupted C. plebeius populations

States that have current populations have conducted studies to understand the contractions of abundance. Arizona has listed C. plebeius as a species of concern, while Colorado has the fish listed as endangered. [5] [14] [15] New Mexico has seen large enough numbers that there is no state designation at this time. [15] Two different species compete directly for resources with the Rio Grande sucker. [18] The White sucker, C. commersonii, and the Yaqui sucker, C. bernardini, are known to have increased phenotypic plasticity with their diets which has enhanced their ability to contend for lower trophic level resources. [3] Through different management techniques, there is the possibility to maintain and restore the endemic species. Hydrological considerations include mimicking natural flows, decreasing channelization, and increasing floodplain connectivity. Aquatic vegetation restoration while decreasing non-native vegetative species and maintaining current riparian habitat is intended to help the species. [22] The impact of overgrazing and its correlation to increased turbidity can be addressed if proper riparian buffer zones are sustained or introduced. Also, decreasing the use of pesticides and herbicides can limit water quality degradation. [3] [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virgin River</span> Tributary of the Colorado River in the southwestern United States

The Virgin River is a tributary of the Colorado River in the U.S. states of Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. The river is about 162 miles (261 km) long. It was designated Utah's first wild and scenic river in 2009, during the centennial celebration of Zion National Park.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longnose sucker</span> Species of fish

The longnose sucker is a species of cypriniform freshwater fish in the family Catostomidae. It is native to North America from the northern United States to the top of the continent. It is also found in Russia in rivers of eastern Siberia, and this one of only two species of sucker native to Asia.

<i>Catostomus</i> Genus of fishes

Catostomus is a genus of fish belonging to the family Catostomidae, commonly known as suckers. This genus of fish usually lives in freshwater basins. Most members of the genus are native to North America, but C. catostomus is also found in Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mountain sucker</span> Species of fish

The mountain sucker is a sucker found throughout western North America, on both sides of the Rocky Mountains, including the upper Missouri River, Columbia River, Sacramento River, and Colorado River. It is not limited to higher altitudes but is known from locations as high as 2,800 m (9,200 ft). It is a slender, streamlined fish typically under 20 cm (8 in) in length. It is generally olive green or brown above, with pale underparts, and breeding males have a lateral red-orange band and fins suffused with the same color. It is mainly herbivorous, feeding on algae and diatoms. Breeding takes place in late spring and early summer in gravelly riffles in small streams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utah sucker</span> Species of fish

The Utah sucker is a species of freshwater fish in the family Catostomidae found in the upper Snake River and the Lake Bonneville areas of western North America where it lives in a wide range of habitats. It is a large sucker growing up to 25 in (64 cm) long. It is generally blackish above, vaguely streaked and blotched, with a white belly. A narrow rosy lateral band extends backwards from the head. The mouth has thick lips and is on the underside of the head. Some populations are in decline because of anthropogenic factors but overall this fish is not threatened.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bonytail chub</span> Species of fish

The bonytail chub or bonytail is a cyprinid freshwater fish native to the Colorado River basin of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming in the southwestern United States; it has been extirpated from the part of the basin in Mexico. It was once abundant and widespread in the basin, its numbers and range have declined to the point where it has been listed as endangered since 1980 (ESA) and 1986 (IUCN), a fate shared by the other large Colorado basin endemic fish species like the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, and razorback sucker. It is now the rarest of the endemic big-river fishes of the Colorado River. There are 20 species in the genus Gila, seven of which are found in Arizona.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yaqui sucker</span> Species of fish

The Yaqui sucker is a species of ray-finned fish in the family Catostomidae. It is found in the Aridoamerica region of northern Mexico and south-western United States. Catostomus bernardini or Yaqui sucker belongs to the family Catostomidae. The Yaqui sucker is related to the Sonora sucker and could possibly be a subspecies of the Gila sucker.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klamath largescale sucker</span> Species of fish

The Klamath largescale sucker is a species of ray-finned fish in the family Catostomidae. It is endemic to the Klamath River basin in northern California and southern Oregon, within the Western United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beautiful shiner</span> Species of fish

The beautiful shiner is a species of ray-finned fish in the family Cyprinidae. It is found in Mexico and Arizona and New Mexico in the United States. It is one of 22 species of Cyprinella found in North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catostomidae</span> Family of fishes

The Catostomidae are the suckers of the order Cypriniformes, with about 78 species in this family of freshwater fishes. The Catostomidae are almost exclusively native to North America. The only exceptions are Catostomus catostomus, found in both North America and Russia, and Myxocyprinus asiaticus found only in China. In the Ozarks they are a common food fish and a festival is held each year to celebrate them. The bigmouth buffalo, Ictiobus cyprinellus, can reach an age up to 127 years, making it the oldest known freshwater teleost by more than 50 years.

<i>Catostomus discobolus</i> Species of fish

The bluehead sucker is endemic to the intermountain Western US. A total of 23 members of the genus Catostomus has been found in North America. C. discobolus and C. yarrowi are two sister species that have very similar Arizona habitats.

<i>Catostomus latipinnis</i> Species of fish

Catostomus latipinnis is a North American fish identified by its enlarged lower lips. It belongs to the genus Catostomus, commonly known as suckers. Historically, the flannelmouth sucker ranged in the Colorado River Basin, including parts of Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, California, and Arizona; however, this species has been entirely extirpated from the Gila River Basin in Arizona.

The Little Colorado River sucker or Little Colorado sucker is a scientifically undescribed species of North American freshwater fish very similar to the flannelmouth sucker but without the flannelmouth's distinct fleshy lips. The Little Colorado sucker is native to the upper region of the Little Colorado River in Arizona, but was also introduced into the Salt River.

Catostomus discobolus jarrovii is a species of fish only found in Arizona and New Mexico in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alabama hog sucker</span> Species of fish

The Alabama hog sucker is a species of fish in the family Catostomidae, the suckers. It is native to several river systems in the southeastern United States. Its range includes much of the state of Alabama and extends into parts of Mississippi, Tennessee, and Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modoc sucker</span> Species of fish

The Modoc sucker is a rare species of freshwater fish native to northern California and southern Oregon. It grows to a length of about 7 in (18 cm) and becomes sexually mature at 4 in (10 cm). It feeds on algae, small invertebrates and detritus, and hides under stones, detritus and overhanging vegetation. It is found in only a few streams and is listed as an endangered species in California and the United States. Conservation measures have been put in place such as fencing the streams in which it lives from livestock. It was previously rated as "endangered" in 1973 by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, but this rating has now been changed to "near threatened", and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service removed the Modoc sucker from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife in 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creek chubsucker</span> Species of freshwater fish

The creek chubsucker is a freshwater fish of the sucker family (Catostomidae).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desert sucker</span> Species of fish

The desert sucker or Gila Mountain sucker, is a freshwater species of ray-finned fish in the sucker family, endemic to the Great Basin and the Colorado River Basin in the United States. It inhabits rapids and fast-flowing streams with gravelly bottoms. It is a bi-colored fish with the upper parts olive brown to dark green, and the underparts silvery-tan or yellowish. The head is cylindrical, tapering to a thick-lipped mouth on the underside. This fish can grow to 31 in (79 cm) in Arizona but is generally only about half this size elsewhere. There are three subspecies, found in different river basins, and some authorities allot this species its own genus Pantosteus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tahoe sucker</span> Species of fish

The Tahoe sucker is a freshwater cypriniform fish inhabiting the Great Basin region of the Western United States.

The southern leatherside chub is a freshwater ray finned fish in the family Cyprinidae. It is endemic to the state of Utah in the United States. Currently, the southern leatherside chub is threatened by habitat loss and degradation as well as invasive species.

References

  1. 1 2 Espinosa Pérez, H. & Lambarri Martínez, C. (2019). "Catostomus plebeius". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2019: e.T191238A130195783. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-2.RLTS.T191238A130195783.en . Retrieved 30 March 2024.
  2. Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Catostomus bernardini". FishBase . May 2020 version.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rees, D.E. and W.J. Miller. (16 May 2005). Rio Grande Sucker (Catostomus plebeius): a technical conservation assessment (PDF) (Technical report). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Retrieved 17 March 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Sublette, J.E.; M.D. Hatch; and M.S. Sublette (1990). The fishes of New Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
  5. 1 2 3 "Rio Grande Sucker". WildEarth Guardians. September 29, 2014.
  6. 1 2 Fuller, P. (19 Aug 2011). "Catostomus plebeius Baird and Girard, 1854". Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, FL: U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 20 Apr 2020.
  7. Myers, P. (2001). "Animalia". Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  8. Lundberg, J. G. (1995). Chordata. Version 01 January 1995 (under construction).  http://tolweb.org/Chordata/2499/1995.01.01in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
  9. Jonna, R. (2004). "Actinopterygii". Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  10. "Teleost Fish: Habitat, Diversity & Reproduction". 21 December 2015. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  11. Bird, Nathan C.; Mabee, Paula M. (2003). "Developmental morphology of the axial skeleton of the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae)". Developmental Dynamics. 228 (3): 337–357. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10387 . PMID   14579374.
  12. Nelson, Joseph S.; Grande, Terry C.; Wilson, Mark V. H. (2016). Fishes of the World (5th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119174844. ISBN   978-1-118-34233-6.
  13. 1 2 3 Pister, P. E. (December 2003). "Natural History". Rio Grande Sucker Recovery Plan.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Fact Sheet and Habitat Scorecard for Rio Grande Sucker". Colorado Parks & Wildlife. February 2019. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Rinne, J. (1995). "Reproductive biology of the Rio Grande sucker, Catostomus plebeius (Cypriniformes), in a montane stream, New Mexico". The Southwestern Naturalist. 40 (2): 237–241. JSTOR   30054431.
  16. McPhee, Megan V. (2007). "Age, Growth, and Life History Comparisons Between the Invasive White Sucker (Catostomus commersoni) and Native Rio Grande Sucker (C. plebeius)". The Southwestern Naturalist. 52: 15–25. doi: 10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[15:agalhc]2.0.co;2 . S2CID   85723721.
  17. 1 2 White, J.A. (1972). Food and feeding habits of the Rio Grande mountain-sucker, Pantosteus plebeius (Baird and Girard) (Masters thesis). Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Swift-Miller, S. M.; Johnson, B. M. & Muth, R. T. (1999). "Factors affecting the diet and abundance of northern populations of Rio Grande sucker (Catostomus plebeius)". The Southwestern Naturalist. 44 (2): 148–156.
  19. 1 2 3 Calamusso, Bob; Rinne, John N.; Turner, Paul R. (2002). "Distribution and Abundance of the Rio Grande Sucker in the Carson and Santa Fe National Forests, New Mexico". The Southwestern Naturalist. 47 (2): 182. doi:10.2307/3672905. JSTOR   3672905.
  20. 1 2 Swift-Miller, S.; Johnson, B.; Muth, R. & Langlois, D. (1999). "Distribution, Abundance, and Habitat Use of Rio Grande Sucker (Catostomus plebeius) in Hot Creek, Colorado". The Southwestern Naturalist. 44 (1): 42–48. JSTOR   30055400.
  21. Arthur, M. and Saffer, D. "The Rio Grande" . Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  22. General Technical Report (Technical report). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. RM-GTR-272.