Service-learning

Last updated
A Service Learning Project at Butam organized by MaxPac Travel for Catholic Junior College students. January 15, 2009. Tay Yong Seng. Service Learning at Batam.jpg
A Service Learning Project at Butam organized by MaxPac Travel for Catholic Junior College students. January 15, 2009. Tay Yong Seng.

Service-learning is an educational approach that uses community service to meet both classroom learning objectives and societal needs. It has been used with students of all grades and stages. Projects based in communities are designed to apply classroom learning to create positive change in the community and often involve community organisations. [1] Recent studies have proven its use in citizen coexistence as a strategy to foster intercultural coexistence in local communities, which is essential for successfully implementing socio-educational interventions. [2]

Contents

Service learning combines experiential learning and community service. [3]

Definitions

According to Andrew Furco, service-learning "occurs when there is a balance between learning goals and service outcomes." [4] Other authors, including the National Youth Leadership Council, emphasize the same balance. [5] [6] Robert Sigmon conceives the variety of service-learning projects found on college campuses in terms of variations in that balance: i.e. whether learning goals or service goals are primary, secondary, of equal importance, or completely separate. [7]

The student is also expected to learn by acting in the world and reflecting on the results of their action. [8] [9] As a process of learning, this has long-established theoretical and empirical bases. According to Barbara Jacoby, therefore, service-learning "is based on the work of researchers and theorists on learning, including John Dewey, Jean Piaget, Kurt Lewin, Donald Schon, and David Kolb, who believe that people learn through combinations of action and reflection." [10] Related areas of academic practice, such as Action Research and Reflective Practice, emphasize the relationship between learner and community, or researcher and researched, [11] [12] with a view to creating change beyond the school, rather than only creating knowledge.

History

The term "service-learning" originated in and spread from the US [13] and is often discussed in the context of American colleges and schools. Much of its history is therefore American.

In American education

In one early account, in the late 1960s federal monies were used for a service-learning internship model by the Southern Regional Education Board. By 1979 the same author claimed "service learning" was being used to describe a number of different volunteer actions and experiential education programs. [14] From 1995 to 1997, 458 universities received grants from the Corporation for National Service under the Learn and Serve Higher Education scheme (see Learn and Serve America), helping create 3,000 new service-learning courses with an average of more than 60 students per course. [8] In 1992, Maryland and the District of Columbia adopted statewide service-learning requirements for high school graduation. [15] [16] In 2014 The National Center for Learning and Civic Engagement surveyed all states for their service-learning policies. [17] However, while service-learning was well-established in American higher education institutions by 2008, it was to be found in less than 30% of K–12 schools according to Furco and Root. [18]

Applications & contexts

There are several documented models of service-learning, such as the Comprehensive Action Plan for Service Learning. [19] There are variants that focus on particular elements or purposes, such as "critical service learning" which emphasizes political and social power relations in marginalized communities. [20] [21] Recent attention has been paid to online service-learning or eService-Learning. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

Service-learning has been used in multiple academic and community contexts. For example, it has been used in and by native American and other potentially marginalized communities. [31] [32] [33] And it has been used within academic specialisms, such as history, [34] sociology, [35] language-learning, [36] and engineering. [37]

Benefits

The benefits of service-learning for the participating student are better-documented than the benefits to the communities in which the service occurs. [38]

Students' development

Students have reported developing personal leadership skills, [39] skills in working with others, including greater interaction with faculty, [8] :45–52 and the development of more meaning and purpose in study. [8] Academically, there is evidence of improved understanding of classroom studies, the application of theory, critical thinking and analysis. [38] Other personal growth outcomes may include self-knowledge, spiritual growth, the reward of helping others, career benefits including careers in service, and changes in personal efficacy [8] :35–39

Experience in communities may result in experience of different cultures. In one survey of service-learning students, "57 percent reported that they had frequent chances to work with people from ethnic groups other than their own." [40] :26 Advocates of service-learning argue that this can help students learn to appreciate their shared humanity [40] :31 and more effectively serve a broader array of people. [40] :177–178

Community development

Service-learning contributes to the presence of more volunteers, which enables community organizations to do more [41] :35–36 and to serve more clients. [42] :5 Students may supply specific skills they possess to benefit the organization, [43] :49 and can be a source of new ideas, energy, and enthusiasm. [44] :33 Through partnering with a college or university, a community organization can gain access to new knowledge and opportunities to connect with other organizations that have partnered with the same school. [41] :36

Service-learning may motivate individuals to become better citizens of their communities by cultivating civic and social responsibility, [8] :12 and through the development of personal relationships. [40] :56 A service-learning experience may be the catalyst in the life of a student to dive into the complexities of the social issues they have encountered and to seek to develop innovative solutions. [45]

Critiques

Service-learning has been the subject of debate throughout its history. It has been criticized for not generating useful skills, nor meaningful cultural or community knowledge, [21] nor doing much for the community itself, [21] [46] and instead mostly inculcating communitarian political ideologies in students [47] and focusing on the student's "good deeds”. [46] Without deeper critical reflection the effect may be to maintain, rather than subvert, systems of community oppression. [21] "Critical service-learning" claims to address some of these issues (see Applications & Contexts, above).

It has also been described as "a utopian vision". [14] :11 University policies that mandate service learning have been criticized as the imposition of intellectual conformity by means of identifying specific types of civic engagement as worthy community service and thus prescribing social and political perspectives, contrary to the ideal of the university as a site for the pursuit of truth through the free exchange of ideas. [48]

The relationship between community and academy is an area of general critique. Communication with faculty is often inconsistent, so community organizations do not always understand their roles and the roles of the faculty in students' service projects. [43] :55–56 Some organizations' representatives have stated that faculty assigned students projects that were not allowed in their organization. [41] And the small number of hours students are required to spend volunteering can cause problems for community organizations and their clients. [41] [43] Even research about service-learning is mostly done by scholars rather than community locals and organizations. [46]

Factors in effectiveness

Research into service-learning claims to have identified a number of factors that determine its effectiveness. These include:

Notable people

Alexander Astin, founding director of the Cooperative Institutional Research Program and the Higher Education Research Institute, formed a Theory of Involvement which explains how student involvement in co-curricular activities positively affects college outcomes. [54] Through a 1998 study of college seniors, Astin demonstrated that service greatly improves critical thinking skills. [55]

Nadinne I. Cruz: works as an independent consultant. [56] She gained enthusiasm for the cause of service learning through her work in the Philippines. [57] Now, she is an advocate of service learning who argues that only a small portion of skills needed to address life's problems can be learned through traditional academia. Other skills, such as courage, forgiveness, and stewarding the earth, must be learned elsewhere. Therefore, she recommends service learning and community engagement, which “offer learning with and from wise people, who teach by example.” [58]

Andrew Furco: Associate Vice President for Public Engagement at the University of Minnesota and a professor. [59] Furco has contributed a variety of literature to service learning, including two books: Service-Learning: The Essence of the Pedagogy and Service-Learning Through a Multidisciplinary Lens, which he co-authored with S. Billig. [60] He gives five reasons engagement programs differ from engaged universities: “Engagement differs from outreach… is at the heart of the university’s identity… focuses on partnerships… is with, not to, for, or in communities… is about institutional transformation.” [61]

James Kielsmeier: Founded the National Youth Leadership Council, a nonprofit that became the service-learning movement. [62] Kielsmeier posits that service learning involves a change in how schools see young people: from “resource users, recipients, and victims” to “contributors, givers, and leaders.” [63]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adult education</span> Any form of learning adults engage in beyond traditional schooling

Adult education, distinct from child education, is a practice in which adults engage in systematic and sustained educating activities in order to gain new knowledge, skills, attitudes, or values. It can mean any form of learning adults engage in beyond traditional schooling, encompassing basic literacy to personal fulfillment as a lifelong learner, and to ensure the fulfillment of an individual.

Student-centered learning, also known as learner-centered education, broadly encompasses methods of teaching that shift the focus of instruction from the teacher to the student. In original usage, student-centered learning aims to develop learner autonomy and independence by putting responsibility for the learning path in the hands of students by imparting to them skills, and the basis on how to learn a specific subject and schemata required to measure up to the specific performance requirement. Student-centered instruction focuses on skills and practices that enable lifelong learning and independent problem-solving. Student-centered learning theory and practice are based on the constructivist learning theory that emphasizes the learner's critical role in constructing meaning from new information and prior experience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Active learning</span> Educational technique

Active learning is "a method of learning in which students are actively or experientially involved in the learning process and where there are different levels of active learning, depending on student involvement." Bonwell & Eison (1991) states that "students participate [in active learning] when they are doing something besides passively listening." According to Hanson and Moser (2003) using active teaching techniques in the classroom can create better academic outcomes for students. Scheyvens, Griffin, Jocoy, Liu, & Bradford (2008) further noted that "by utilizing learning strategies that can include small-group work, role-play and simulations, data collection and analysis, active learning is purported to increase student interest and motivation and to build students ‘critical thinking, problem-solving and social skills". In a report from the Association for the Study of Higher Education, authors discuss a variety of methodologies for promoting active learning. They cite literature that indicates students must do more than just listen in order to learn. They must read, write, discuss, and be engaged in solving problems. This process relates to the three learning domains referred to as knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSA). This taxonomy of learning behaviors can be thought of as "the goals of the learning process." In particular, students must engage in such higher-order thinking tasks as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.

Cooperative education is a structured method of combining classroom-based education with practical work experience.

Experiential education is a philosophy of education that describes the process that occurs between a teacher and student that infuses direct experience with the learning environment and content. This concept is distinct from experiential learning, however experiential learning is a subfield and operates under the methodologies associated with experiential education. The Association for Experiential Education regards experiential education as "a philosophy that informs many methodologies in which educators purposefully engage with learners in direct experience and focused reflection in order to increase knowledge, develop skills, clarify values, and develop people's capacity to contribute to their communities". The Journal of Experiential Education publishes peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical academic research within the field.

Blended learning or hybrid learning, also known as technology-mediated instruction, web-enhanced instruction, or mixed-mode instruction, is an approach to education that combines online educational materials and opportunities for interaction online with physical place-based classroom methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community service</span> Unpaid work to benefit a community

Community service is unpaid work performed by a person or group of people for the benefit and betterment of their community contributing to a noble cause. In many cases, people doing community service are compensated in other ways, such as getting a lunch for free. In many countries, there are programs to incite people to do community service. People may do community service to get citizenship. In some cases, it is possible to replace a criminal justice sanctions with community service. There may also be school or class requirements. Obtaining certain benefits may be linked to doing some form of community service. For all these reasons, it is distinct from volunteering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student affairs</span> Department of services for student success at institutions of higher education

Student affairs, student support, or student services is the department or division of services and support for student success at institutions of higher education to enhance student growth and development. People who work in this field are known as student affairs educators, student affairs practitioners, or student affairs professionals. These student affairs practitioners work to provide services and support for students and drive student learning outside of the classroom at institutions of higher education.

Residence Life is the comprehensive program that surrounds the experience of living "on and off campus" in a residence hall at a college or university. Residence Life is usually structured with planned events, a code of conduct and ethics, and a relatively large array of staff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civic engagement</span> Individual or group activity addressing issues of public concern

Civic engagement or civic participation is any individual or group activity addressing issues of public concern. Civic engagement includes communities working together or individuals working alone in both political and non-political actions to protect public values or make a change in a community. The goal of civic engagement is to address public concerns and promote the quality of the community.

Social presence theory explores how the "sense of being with another" is influenced by digital interfaces in human-computer interactions. Developed from the foundations of interpersonal communication and symbolic interactionism, social presence theory was first formally introduced by John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie in The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Research on social presence theory has recently developed to examine the efficacy of telecommunications media, including SNS communications. The theory notes that computer-based communication is lower in social presence than face-to-face communication, but different computer-based communications can affect the levels of social presence between communicators and receivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volunteering</span> Act of freely giving time and labor

Volunteering is an elective and free-choice act of an individual or group freely giving time and labor, often for community service. Many volunteers are specifically trained in the areas they work, such as medicine, education, or emergency rescue. Others serve on an as-needed basis, such as in response to a natural disaster.

Learning by doing is a theory that places heavy emphasis on student engagement and is a hands-on, task-oriented, process to education. The theory refers to the process in which students actively participate in more practical and imaginative ways of learning. This process distinguishes itself from other learning approaches as it provides many pedagogical advantages to more traditional learning styles, such those which privilege inert knowledge. Learning-by-doing is related to other types of learning such as adventure learning, action learning, cooperative learning, experiential learning, peer learning, service-learning, and situated learning.

Andrew Furco is an American scholar, researcher, and educator in the field of experiential education, whose work has focused primarily on advancing research in service learning. Service learning is an instructional approach whereby students participate in community service that is linked to their academic learning. Service learning has been adopted in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities in the United States, Canada and in countries throughout South America, Australia, Africa, Asia and Europe.

Nadinne Irene Cruz has served as an advocate and practitioner of service-learning and experiential education across institutions of higher education.

Action civics is a modern and alternative form of civics education in the United States. Action civics is an applied civic education process in which participants learn about government by examining issues in their own community and then select a focus issue for action through a process of debate, research the issue and learn advocacy strategies, develop civic skills such as public speaking, formulate a plan, mobilize, educate, then evaluate, and reflect on their experience. Participants' voices are encouraged, valued and incorporated. Participants learn by doing, with a focus on collective action. Action civics can encompass a number of different actions from community service to electoral engagement and from talking about concerns with public officials to creating peer education campaigns.

Social media in education is the use of social media to enhance education. Social media are "a group of Internet-based applications...that allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content". It is also known as the read/write web. As time went on and technology evolved, social media has been an integral part of people's lives, including students, scholars, and teachers. However, social media are controversial because, in addition to providing new means of connection, critics claim that they damage self-esteem, shortens attention spans, and increase mental health issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning environment</span> Term in education

The term learning environment can refer to an educational approach, cultural context, or physical setting in which teaching and learning occur. The term is commonly used as a more definitive alternative to "classroom", but it typically refers to the context of educational philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy. In a societal sense, learning environment may refer to the culture of the population it serves and of their location. Learning environments are highly diverse in use, learning styles, organization, and educational institution. The culture and context of a place or organization includes such factors as a way of thinking, behaving, or working, also known as organizational culture. For a learning environment such as an educational institution, it also includes such factors as operational characteristics of the instructors, instructional group, or institution; the philosophy or knowledge experienced by the student and may also encompass a variety of learning cultures—its presiding ethos and characteristics, how individuals interact, governing structures, and philosophy in learning styles and pedagogies used; and the societal culture of where the learning is occurring. Although physical environments do not determine educational activities, there is evidence of a relationship between school settings and the activities that take place there.

Marketing simulation games provide participants with an interactive method of testing out marketing decisions in an environment which is virtual or which has game characteristics. Common game topics belong to categories such as: marketing strategy, product positioning, pricing strategies, consumer behaviour. Marketing games usually focus on the marketing landscape of a certain business industry or a company. A marketing simulation game usually contains a number of scenarios and provides participants with results in response to their decisions.

There are differing definitions of service-learning. Weigert states that in service-learning "three of the elements focus more on the community side of the equation; the other three focus more on the campus side. On the community side: the student provides some meaningful service, that meets a need or goal, that is defined by a community. On the campus side: the service provided by the student flows from and into course objectives, is integrated into the course by means of assignments that require some form of reflection on the service in light of course objectives, and the assignment is assessed and evaluated accordingly."

References

  1. Knapp, Timothy D.; Bradley J. Fisher (2010). "The Effectiveness of Service-Learning: It's not always what you think". Journal of Experiential Education. 33 (3): 208–224. doi:10.5193/JEE33.3.208.
  2. Ferrer-Aracil, J.; Giménez-Bertomeu V.M.; Cortés-Florín E.M. (2022). "Implementation of Service-Learning as a Strategy to Foster Intercultural Coexistence in the Local Community: A Case Study". Education Sciences. 12 (7): 426. doi: 10.3390/educsci12070426 .
  3. Perez, Shivaun (2000). "Assessing Service Learning Using Pragmatic Principles of Education: A Texas Charter School Case Study". Applied Research Projects. Paper 76. Texas State University. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2010-01-01.
  4. Furco, Andrew (October 2011). "'Service-Learning': A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education" (PDF). The International Journal for Global and Development Education Research: 71–76. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
  5. "K–12 Service-Learning Standards for Quality Practice" (PDF). National Youth Leadership Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2008.
  6. Jacoby, Barbara (1996). Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. Jossey-Bass. ISBN   978-0787902919.
  7. Sigmon, Robert (1997). Linking Service with Learning in Liberal Arts Education (Report). Council of Independent Colleges, Washington, DC. Retrieved 2024-09-30.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Eyler, Janet; Giles Jr., Dwight E. (1999). Where's the Learning in Service-Learning (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN   978-0-470-90746-7.
  9. "Service Learning: Reflection in Higher Education Service-Learning". Archived from the original on November 14, 2007. Retrieved November 22, 2013.
  10. Lukenchuk, Antonina; Jagla, Virginia; Eigel, Matthew. "Service-Learning Faculty Manual" (PDF). National Louis University. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 7, 2015. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
  11. Eatman, Timothy K.; Ivory, Gaelle; Saltmarsh, John; Middleton, Michael; Wittman, Amanda; Dolgon, Corey (April 2018). "Co-Constructing Knowledge Spheres in the Academy: Developing Frameworks and Tools for Advancing Publicly Engaged Scholarship". Urban Education. 53 (4): 532–561. doi:10.1177/0042085918762590. ISSN   0042-0859. S2CID   150220178.
  12. Powell, Katrina; Takayoshi, Pamela (2003). "Accepting the Roles Created for Us: The Ethics of Reciprocity" (PDF). College Composition and Communication. 54 (3): 394–422. doi:10.2307/3594171. JSTOR   3594171.
  13. Thomson, Ann Marie; Smith-Tolken, Antoinette R.; Naidoo, Anthony V.; Bringle, Robert G. (2011-06-01). "Service Learning and Community Engagement: A Comparison of Three National Contexts". Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 22 (2): 214–237. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9133-9. hdl: 1805/4594 . ISSN   1573-7888.
  14. 1 2 Sigmon, Robert (Spring 1979). "Service-Learning: Three Principles" (PDF). Synergist: 9–11. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
  15. "Graduation Requirements". Maryland Department of Education.
  16. "DCPS Community Service Guide 2011–2012" (PDF). District of Columbia Public Schools. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  17. "High School Graduation Requirement or Credit toward Graduation – Service-Learning/Community Service". Education Commission of the States (ECS). January 2014. Retrieved November 5, 2016.
  18. Furco, Andrew; Root, Susan; Furco, Anthony (2010). "Research Demonstrates the Value of Service Learning". The Phi Delta Kappan. 91 (5): 16–20. doi:10.1177/003172171009100504. ISSN   0031-7217. JSTOR   27755635.
  19. Robert, G. Bringle; Julie A. Hatcher (March–April 1996). "Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education" (PDF). Journal of Higher Education. 67 (2). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-18.
  20. Kraft, Richard J. (February 1996). "Service Learning". Education and Urban Society. 28 (2): 131–159. doi:10.1177/0013124596028002001. ISSN   0013-1245. S2CID   143302144.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Mitchell, Tania (2008). "Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models". Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 14.2. 14 (2): 50–65.
  22. Strait & Sauer, Jean & Tim (2023). "Constructing Experiential Learning for Online Courses: The Birth of E-Service A lack of service-learning programs for online courses prompted the creation of e-service to provide experiential learning opportunities". Educause Quarterly: 62–65.
  23. Faulconer, Emily (2021-04-03). "eService-Learning: A Decade of Research in Undergraduate Online Service–learning". American Journal of Distance Education. 35 (2): 100–117. doi:10.1080/08923647.2020.1849941. ISSN   0892-3647. S2CID   230540426.
  24. Waldner, McGorry, & Widener, L, S, M (2010). "Extreme e-service learning (XE-SL): E-service learning in the 100% online course". Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 6 (4): 839–851.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. Doulatabadi, M.; Yusof, S. M. (2016). "Sustained Quality Award Status in Developing Country: A Study on the Dubai Quality Award Recipients". 2016 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Application (ICIMSA). IEEE. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/icimsa.2016.7504036. ISBN   978-1-5090-1671-6. S2CID   25518080.
  26. McGorry, Sue Y. (2012-06-23). "No Significant Difference in Service Learninng Online". Online Learning. 16 (4). doi:10.24059/olj.v16i4.218. ISSN   2472-5730.
  27. Bourelle, Tiffany (2014-10-01). "Adapting Service-Learning into the Online Technical Communication Classroom: A Framework and Model". Technical Communication Quarterly. 23 (4): 247–264. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.941782. ISSN   1057-2252. S2CID   62234740.
  28. Nielsen, Danielle (April 2016). "Facilitating Service Learning in the Online Technical Communication Classroom". Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 46 (2): 236–256. doi:10.1177/0047281616633600. ISSN   0047-2816. S2CID   111627624.
  29. McWhorter, Rochell; Delello, Julie; Roberts, Paul (2016-01-01). "Giving Back: Exploring Service-Learning in an Online Learning Environment". Education Faculty Publications and Presentations.
  30. Marcus, Valerie Bukas; Atan, Noor Azean; Talib, Rohaya; Latif, Adibah Abdul; Yusof, Sanitah Mohd (2019-10-18). "Promoting Students' Generic Skills with the Integration of e-Service Learning Platform". International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 14 (20): 4–17. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i20.11455 . ISSN   1863-0383. S2CID   208107376.
  31. Guffey, John (1997). "Turtle Island Project: Service-Learning in Native Communities". In Erickson, Joseph A.; Anderson, Jeffrey B. (eds.). Learning with the Community: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Teacher Education. AAHE's Series on Service-Learning in the Disciplines. Stylus Publishing, LLC. ISBN   9781563770111.
  32. Fletcher, Matthew (2008). American Indian Education: Counternarratives in Racism, Struggle, and the Law. Routledge. ISBN   978-0415957359.
  33. Sykes, Brent E.; Pendley, Joy; Deacon, Zermarie (22 June 2017). "Transformative learning, tribal membership and cultural restoration: A case study of an embedded Native American service-learning project at a research university". Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement. 10: 204–228. doi: 10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5334 via epress.lib.uts.edu.au.
  34. Straus, Emily E.; Eckenrode, Dawn M. (2014). "Engaging Past and Present: Service-Learning in the College History Classroom". The History Teacher. 47 (2): 253–266. ISSN   0018-2745. JSTOR   43264227.
  35. Mooney, Linda A.; Edwards, Bob (2001). "Experiential Learning in Sociology: Service Learning and Other Community-Based Learning Initiatives". Teaching Sociology. 29 (2): 181–194. doi:10.2307/1318716. ISSN   0092-055X. JSTOR   1318716.
  36. Tocaimaza-Hatch, C. Cecilia; Walls, Laura C. (2016). "Service-Learning as a Means of Vocabulary Learning for Second Language and Heritage Language Learners of Spanish". Hispania. 99 (4): 650–665. doi:10.1353/hpn.2016.0109. ISSN   0018-2133. JSTOR   44114650.
  37. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering , retrieved 2024-10-03
  38. 1 2 Jacoby, Barbara (2015). Service-learning essentials: questions, answers, and lessons learned. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. Jeffrey Howard. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-118-94401-1.
  39. Alexander W. Astin; Lori J. Vogelgesang; Elaine K. Ikeda; Jennifer A. Yee. "How Service Learning Affects Students". Digital Commons. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Eyler, Janet & Giles, Dwight E. (2007). Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  41. 1 2 3 4 Sandy, Marie; Holland, Barbara A. (Fall 2006). "Different Worlds and Common Ground: Community Partner Perspectives on Campus-Community Partnerships". Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 13 (1): 30–43. Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  42. Barrientos, Perla. "Community Service Learning and its Impact on Community Agencies: An Assessment Study" (PDF). www.sfsu.edu. San Francisco State University. Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  43. 1 2 3 Tryon, Elizabeth; Stoecker, Randy (September 2008). "The Unheard Voices: Community Organizations and Service-Learning". Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement. 12 (3). Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  44. Vernon, Andrea; Ward, Kelly (1999). "Campus and Community Partnerships: Assessing Impacts and Strengthening Connections". Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. 6 (1). Retrieved 13 December 2014.
  45. 1 2 "Reflection in service-learning classes". Center for Community-Engaged Learning. Retrieved June 2, 2016.
  46. 1 2 3 Eby, John (1998), Why Service Learning is Bad
  47. Egger, John (2008). "No Service to Learning: 'Service-Learning' Reappraised" (PDF). Academic Questions. 21 (2): 183–194. doi:10.1007/s12129-008-9057-7 (inactive 1 November 2024). S2CID   59038318.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  48. Carl L. Bankston III (31 May 2016). "Modern Orthodoxies".
  49. Chavez-Yenter, Daniel; Hearld, Kristine Ria; Badham, Amy; Budhwani, Henna (13 November 2015). "Service-Learning in Undergraduate Global Health Education: The Effect of Team Dynamics on Civic Attitudes and Skills". The International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement. 3 (1). doi: 10.37333/001c.21578 . ISSN   2374-9466.
  50. Eyler, Janet; Giles Jr., Dwight (1997). "The Importance of Program Quality in Service-Learning". In Waterman, Alan S. (ed.). Service-Learning: Applications From the Research. New York: Psychology Press. p. 59.
  51. Astin, Alexander W.; Sax, Linda J. (1998). "How Undergraduates are Affected by Service Participation". Journal of College Student Development: 260.
  52. Mabry, J. Beth (1998). "Pedagogical Variations in Service-Learning and Student Outcomes". Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning: 41.
  53. Robin R. Jones. "Service-Learning Reflection Activities" (PDF). Wartburg College. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 5, 2012. Retrieved June 2, 2016.
  54. "Alexander Astin's Theory of Involvement". Student Development Theory. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  55. Eyler, Janet; Giles, Dwight E. Jr. (1999). Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. ISBN   0-7879-4483-1.
  56. Thomas, Melissa. "About Nadinne Cruz". Carleton. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  57. McCaffrey, Meg. "Nadinne Cruz, renowned practitioner and advocate of service learning, to be involved in major Fairfield University initiative". Fairfield University. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  58. "TEDxPioneerValley –Nadinne Cruz – Education on Fire.mov". YouTube. 25 February 2012. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  59. "Faculty & Instructors". University of Minnesota. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  60. "Andrew Furco". The Taillores Network. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  61. Maynard, Meleah. "Awesomely Urban: A Conversation with Andrew Furco". University of Minnesota Alumni Association. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  62. "Founder". National Youth Leadership Council. Retrieved 18 July 2018.
  63. "Service and schools – partnership on purpose: Jim Kielsmeier at TEDxFargo". YouTube. 14 October 2013. Retrieved 18 July 2018.

Further reading