Siege of Daulatabad (1633)

Last updated
Siege of Daulatabad
The Siege of Daulatabad (April-June 1633) c. 1635 - 1650.jpg
Illustration of the Mughal siege of Daulatabad fort by Murar from a Padshahnama manuscript c.1635 - 1650, Royal Collection
Date1633
Location
Result Mughal victory
Belligerents
  Mughal Empire Ahmadnagar Sultanate
Bijapur Sultanate
Commanders and leaders

Mahabat Khan
Khan Zaman

Nasiri Khan

Fath Khan
Murari Pandit
Randaula Khan

Shahji Bhonsle

The Siege of Daulatabad (1633) was a conflict between the Mughal Empire and the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, wherein the fort-city of Daulatabad was besieged by a Mughal force for several months and successfully captured. The Bijapur Sultanate also participated in the conflict against the Mughals, sending a large army to the aid of the fort's garrison. The conflict took place after several Mughal victories securing other minor forts in Ahmadnagar control, but was distinguished by the political significance of Daulatabad to the Ahmadnagar Sultanate. This event marked Mughal victory in the ongoing war between the Mughals and the Ahmadnagar Sultanate; it ended the Nizam Shahi dynasty and concluded the Sultanate, marking another step in the Mughal advance over the Deccan region. The victory did not fully quell resistance in the Western Deccan; a year later, Maratha commander Shahji Bhonsle attempted a bid for power using a puppet ruler of the Nizam Shahi house.

Contents

Background

The Mughal emperor Shah Jahan succeeded his father Jahangir in the year 1628, following which his attention immediately turned to consolidating Mughal authority over the Deccan Sultanates. Particularly, his objective was to recover Mughal territories lost to the Nizam Shahis of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate in the final years of Jahangir's reign. In February 1630, he and his armies marched south in pursuit of Khan Jahan Lodi, a rebel Mughal commander who had defected to the Nizam Shahis. Upon the successful capture and execution of Lodi, Shah Jahan began campaigning against the Ahmadnagar Sultanate from his base in Burhanpur. These events coincided with the Deccan famine of 1630–1632, which devastated the countryside. [1] [2] [3]

At this time, the Ahmadnagar Sultanate was tenuously ruled by its prime minister Fath Khan, son of Malik Ambar, and power was nominally in the hands of Burhan Nizam Shah III. Daulatabad served as the seat of Nizam Shahi power. Since Shah Jahan's arrival in the region, the Mughals had captured a number of lesser forts. In 1632, Fath Khan decided to acknowledge Mughal sovereignty. He performed several acts to prove his sincerity, including the execution of Burhan Nizam Shah, the installation of boy prince Hussain Shah as ruler, and the execution of a number of leading officers of the kingdom. Shah Jahan eventually acquiesced and withdrew to the north in 1632, partly due to the death of his wife Mumtaz Mahal a year prior. [4] [5] [6] He appointed Mahabat Khan as governor of the Deccan. [3]

Fath Khan's submission was unpopular in the Nizam Shahi kingdom. It prompted the commander Shahji Bhonsle to defect from the Mughal side and negotiate with the Bijapur Sultanate, which sent a large army to seize the fort of Daulatabad, commanded by Randaula Khan and Murari Pandit. Fath Khan wrote to Mahabat Khan, seeking Mughal support to fend off the Adil Shahi force. Mahabat Khan dispatched his son Khan Zaman to his aid. Khan Zaman's army advanced on Daulatabad; Adil Shahi forces, as well as a force commanded by Shahji, tried to stop the advance but failed. This prompted Randaula Khan, a general of the Adil Shahi army, to open negotiations with Fath Khan. The latter was convinced to switch sides and oppose the Mughals; Fath Khan prepared to defend the fort from the advancing Mughal forces. When Mahabat Khan was informed of this news, he gave the order to Khan Zaman of opening a siege on Daulatabad's fort. [5]

Siege

Preparations

Upon receiving orders from his father Mahabat Khan, Khan Zaman dispatched Deccani forces that had been obstructing the Mughal advance, and then began preparations for a siege by digging trenches and laying mines. Mahabat Khan himself arrived at the city on 1st March 1633, after securing supply lines for the Mughal forces, and the next morning took up residence in a house belonging to the Nizam Shahi king. The fort was surrounded, and batteries were stationed at strategic points. [5]

Fath Khan moved the Nizam Shahi king Hussain Shah to Kalakot, a well-fortified section within the Daulatabad fort. He himself resided in Mahakot, another section of the fort. He worked to fortify different parts of the citadel by distributing command and installing guns at vital locations. [5]

Capture of Ambarkot

Shah Jahan watches the assault on Daulatabad Fort in 1633.jpg
Capture of Daulatabad Fort in 1633, Folio from Lahori.jpg
A Mughal folio from a copy of the Padshahnama, featuring a retrospective depiction of the assault on Daulatabad fort, c. 1800.The fort is rendered as a fortified palace, rather than an actual mountain fortress (left). Emperor Shah Jahan watches the assault (right). From LACMA. [7]

The initial stages of the siege were characterised by repeated skirmishes between the Mughal forces, the Adil Shahi army, and Shahji's forces. The Adil Shahis and Shahji repeatedly attempted to subvert the Mughal blockade by sneaking provisions into Daulatabad's fort, and these efforts were frequently caught and cut short by the Mughal army. However, this served as an effective distraction from the Mughals' task of breaking into the fort. The Adil Shahi commander Randaula Khan and Shahji also cooperated in leading several assaults aimed at disrupting Mughal lines of communication, but these attempts were repeatedly rebuked by the Mughal forces. [5] The failure of the Adil Shahi forces and Shahji prompted Fath Khan, who was embedded in the fort, to attempt open combat by sending out war elephants and trying to remove mines; this effort failed, and Fath Khan was forced to retreat after sustaining heavy losses. Khan Zaman pressed the siege of the fort; the plan was to assemble a storming party at dawn, following which a mine would be detonated at first light. In actuality, the officer in charge of the mine mistakenly fired it earlier, before the storming party could arrive. Mahabat Khan resolved to lead the party instead, but Nasiri Khan insisted otherwise and commanded the charge. [5] [8] Mughal forces were able to flood into the breach created by the mine and occupy Ambarkot, the outermost fortification of the citadel, after outnumbering defenders led by Khairat Khan. [5] [9]

Capture of Mahakot

Following this victory, Randaula Khan and Shahji once again attempted to distract the Mughals and sneak in provisions to feed the fort's starving garrison. They dispatched forces to raid Telangana and Berar, while simultaneously sending grain to the fort with a convoy of 3000 musketeers. Mahabat Khan dispatched forces to foil the raiders, and employed Nasiri Khan to intercept the convoy; both operations were successful. Subsequently, Mahabat Khan began the siege of the next layer of defenses, a fortified sector of the citadel known as Mahakot. He managed to successfully lay a mine in Mahakot's fortifications, which prompted Fath Khan to move his family to Kalakot out of fear. By this point, a number of Bijapuri members of the fort's garrison had exited the fort with Mahabat Khan's permission and returned home, due to the acute food shortage. [5]

Adil Shahi forces and Shahji continued their attempts to disrupt Mughal communications, hoping to reduce pressure on Mahakot. They snuck provisions and raided Berar, but their attempts were disrupted by Khan Zaman. The Deccani side benefited with the arrival of reinforcements from Bijapur, and plans were drawn to lead assaults on Mahabat Khan, but these were also met with defeat. [5]

At this stage, Mahabat Khan successfully had a mine carried into Mahakot's defenses. This alarmed Fath Khan, who reached out to Mahabat Khan asking to postpone its detonation; the latter asked him to send his son to the Mughal camp as a token of his sincerity, but delays in doing so led to Mahabat Khan firing the mine anyway. The mine destroyed one bastion and eighteen yards of fortifications. Mughal forces entered through this breach and won over Mahakot. [5]

Surrender

Confronted by the fall of Mahakot, the continuing failure to secure supplies for the fort garrison, general famine in the area, and the breakout of epidemic among troops, Fath Khan decided to surrender to the Mughal force. He sent his son Abdul Rasul on his behalf, to issue an apology to Mahabat Khan for his treachery. He requested a week's time to evacuate the fort, which Mahabat granted, even giving him supplies and a lump sum to facilitate his departure. Mahabat Khan entered the fort of Daulatabad in June 1633, and had the khutbah (Friday sermon) read in Shah Jahan's name, symbolising Mughal sovereignty over Daulatabad. [5] [8]

Aftermath

The conquest of Daulatabad fort ended the Ahmednagar Sultanate as an independent principality, and concluded the Nizam Shahi dynasty. [6] [3] Fath Khan was arrested by Mahabat Khan, despite earlier assurance of amnesty; both him and the Nizam Shahi family were brought to emperor Shah Jahan. Fath Khan was allowed a peaceful retirement, but the Nizam Shahi ruler Hussain Shah was imprisoned in Gwalior. [4] Mahabat Khan died in 1634, the year after Daulatabad's successful siege. At the time of his death, he was the highest-ranking Mughal noble of non-royal blood. For his participation in the siege of Daulatabad, Nasiri Khan had his rank raised and was awarded the title Khan Dauran. [10] Under Mughal control, the Daulatabad fort thereafter acted as a grain warehouse supplying Mughal troops headed towards the south of the Indian subcontinent. [11]

However, resistance in the region continued. In 1634, Shahji propped up a young prince from the Nizam Shahi household as ruler, styling him Murtaza Nizam Shah III. [4] [2] The former assembled an army that absorbed the disbanding Nizam Shahi troops, supplanted with generous military support from the Adil Shahi king. Shahji fought in this puppet ruler's name, contesting the Mughal hold over the regions formerly under the Ahmadnagar Sultanate. This prompted Shah Jahan himself to return to the Deccan in 1635, resulting in a 1636 treaty with the Bijapur Sultanate. The treaty fully consolidated the Mughal hold over Ahmadnagar territory; it made Bijapur recognize Mughal suzerainty and offer military cooperation against Shahji, which led to the demise of the latter's campaigns. Along with a similar treaty made with the neighbouring Golconda Sultanate, this resulted in peace for the Deccan region over the next two decades, and resolved the extended 'Deccan crisis' of Shah Jahan's reign. [3] [2] [6]

Related Research Articles

The Deccan sultanates were five late-medieval Indian kingdoms—on the Deccan Plateau between the Krishna River and the Vindhya Range—that were created from the disintegration of the Bahmani Sultanate and ruled by Muslim dynasties: namely Ahmadnagar, Berar, Bidar, Bijapur, and Golconda. The sultanates had become independent during the break-up of the Bahmani Sultanate. The five sultanates owed their existence to the declaration of independence of Ahmadnagar in 1490, followed by Bijapur and Berar in the same year. Golconda became independent in 1518, and Bidar in 1528.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adil Shahi dynasty</span> Ruling dynasty of Sultanate of Bijapur

The Adil Shahi or Adilshahi, was the reigning dynasty of the Sultanate of Bijapur in the western Deccan and South India from 1489 to 1686. Bijapur had been a taraf (province) of the Bahmani Sultanate prior to its independence and was a member of the Deccan Sultanates, the collective name of the five successor states of the Bahmani Sultanate, before its political decline in the last quarter of the 15th century and eventual break-up in 1518. The Bijapur Sultanate was fully absorbed into the Mughal Empire on 12 September 1686, after its conquest by Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abul Hasan Qutb Shah</span> 8th Sultan of Golconda

Abul Hasan Qutb Shah, also known as Abul Hasan Tana Shah was the eighth and last ruler of the Qutb Shahi dynasty, sovereign of the Kingdom of Golconda in South India. He ruled from 1672 to 1686. The last Sultan of this Shia Islamic dynasty, Tana Shah is remembered as an inclusive ruler. Instead of appointing only Muslims as ministers, he appointed Brahmin Hindus such as Madanna and Akkanna brothers as ministers in charge of tax collection and exchequer. Towards the end of his reign, one of his Muslim generals defected to the Mughal Empire, who then complained to Aurangzeb about the rising power of the Hindus as ministers in his Golconda Sultanate. Aurangzeb sent a regiment led by his son, who beheaded Tana Shah's Hindu ministers and plundered the Sultanate. In 1687, Aurangzeb ordered an arrest of Tana Shah, who was then imprisoned at the Daulatabad Fort. He died in prison in 1699.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shahaji</span> Father of Shivaji Bhonsle and eldest son of Maloji Raje Bhonsle (1594-1664)

Shahaji Bhosale was a 17th century Indian military leader who served the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, the Bijapur Sultanate, and the Mughal Empire at various points in his career. As a member of the Bhonsle dynasty, Shahaji inherited the Pune and Supe jagirs (fiefs) from his father Maloji, who previously served the Ahmadnagar Sultanate. During the Mughal invasion of the Deccan, Shahaji joined the Mughal forces and served under Emperor Shah Jahan for a short period. After being deprived of his jagirs, he defected to the Bijapur Sultanate in 1632 and regained control over Pune and Supe. In 1638, he received the jagir of Bangalore after Bijapur's invasion of Kempe Gowda III's territories. Afterwards, he became the chief general of Bijapur and oversaw its expansion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ibrahim Adil Shah II</span> Sultan

Ibrahim Adil Shah II was Sultan of the Sultanate of Bijapur and a member of the Adil Shahi dynasty. Under his reign the dynasty had its greatest period as he extended its frontier as far south as Mysore. He was a skilful administrator, artist, poet and a generous patron of the arts. He reverted to the Sunni orthodoxy of Islam, but remained tolerant of other religions, including Christianity. However, during his reign high-ranking Shiite immigrants became unwelcome and in 1590, he ordered the confinement of criers who read the khutba in the Shia form. After his reign, increasing weakness permitted Mughal encroachment and the successful revolt of the Maratha king Shivaji, who killed the Bijapur general Afzal Khan and scattered his army. The dynasty left a tradition of cosmopolitan culture and artistic patronage whose architectural remains are to be seen in the capital city of Bijapur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malik Ambar</span> Military leader of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate (1548–1626)

Malik Ambar was a military leader who served as the Peshwa of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate in the Deccan region of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chand Bibi</span> Regent of Bijapur and Ahmednagar

Sultana Chand Bibi was an Indian ruler and warrior. She acted as the Regent of Bijapur Sultanate during the minority of Ibrahim Adil Shah II in 1580-1590, and regent of Ahmednagar Sultanate during the minority of her great nephew Bahadur Shah in 1595-1600. Chand Bibi is best known for defending Ahmednagar against the Mughal forces of Emperor Akbar in 1595.

The Farooqi dynasty or the Farooq Shahi was the ruling dynasty of the Khandesh Sultanate from its inception in 1382 till its annexation by the Mughal emperor Akbar in 1601. The founder of the dynasty, Malik Ahmad participated in a rebellion against the Bahmani ruler Muhmmad Shah I in his early years. When he was compelled to flee from Deccan, he established in Thalner on the Tapti River. After receiving the grant of the fiefdoms of Thalner and Karanda from Firuz Shah Tughluq in 1370, he conquered the region around Thalner, which later became known as Khandesh. By 1382, he started ruling independently.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahabat Khan</span> Mughal general and statesman

Mahabat Khan, born Zamana Beg, was a prominent Mughal general and statesman, perhaps best known for his coup against the Mughal Emperor Jahangir in 1626. He also served Subahdar of Malwa Subah from 1611 to 1623 and Bengal Subah during 1625–1626. He earned the title Khan-i-Khanan from emperor Shah Jahan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ahmadnagar Sultanate</span> Deccan Indian kingdom (1490–1636)

The Sultanate of Ahmednagar or the Nizam Shahi Sultanate was a late medieval Indian Muslim kingdom located in the northwestern Deccan, between the sultanates of Gujarat and Bijapur, ruled by the Nizam Shahi or Bahri dynasty. It was established when Malik Ahmed, the Bahmani governor of Junnar after defeating the Bahmani army led by general Jahangir Khan on 28 May 1490 declared independence and established the Nizam Shahi dynasty of the Sultanate of Ahmednagar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bijapur</span> 17th century siege in India

The siege of Bijapur began in March 1685 and ended in September 1686 with a Mughal victory. The siege began when Aurangzeb dispatched his son, Muhammad Azam Shah, with a force of nearly 50,000 men to capture Bijapur Fort and defeat Sikandar Adil Shah, the then ruler of Bijapur, who refused to be a vassal of the Mughal Empire. The siege of Bijapur was among the longest military engagements of the Mughals, lasting more than 15 months until Aurangzeb personally arrived to organize a victory.

Murtaza Nizam Shah III, was a Nizam Shahi boy prince who in the year 1633 became the nominal Sultan of Ahmednagar. He was subjected to the authority of the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paranda Fort</span> 15th-century Indian fort

Paranda Fort is situated in Paranda, a small town in the Osmanabad district in the state of Maharashtra, India. It is protected monument by the Archaeological Survey Of India. The fort may have been constructed in the 15th century by Mahmud Gawan or by Murtaza Nizam Shah II in the early 1600s. Paranda has great historical value and finde mention in Honnati inscription of Baka 1045 and also later a few of the Kalyan Chalukyan an copper plates. As well as in Yadava epigraphs, as Pallyanda Pratyandaka. The fort is attraction in this Paranda town and is known to have been built by Mahmud Gavan, the Prime Ministar of Muhammad Shah Bahmani 2.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Architecture of the Bahmani and Deccan Sultanates</span> Islamic architecture of the Deccan Plateau, India

Deccani architecture, particularly the architecture of the Bahmani and Deccan Sultanates, is the architecture of the Deccan Plateau, and is a regional variant of Indo-Islamic architecture. It was influenced by the styles of the Delhi Sultanate and later Mughal architecture, but sometimes also influenced from Persia and Central Asia. Hindu temple architecture in the same areas had very different styles.

The Battle of Bhatvadi was fought in 1624, near modern Bhatodi Pargaon village in Maharashtra, India. The Ahmadnagar army led by Malik Ambar defeated a combined Mughal-Bijapur force led by the Bijapuri general Mullah Muhammad Lari.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khwaja Sabir</span>

Khwaja Sabir, Nasiri Khan or Khan-i-Dauran was an Indian Muslim viceroy of the Deccan and one of the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan’s leading sardars. He received the title "Khan Dauran" during the conquest of Daulatabad. He died in Lahore in 1645 from a knife wound from his own attendant, a Kashmiri Brahmin. He hald the rank of 7,000 horse.

the Raid of Ahmednagar took place in 1657, when the Marathas led by Shivaji penetrated as far as Ahmednagar in hopes of asseting Bijapur Sultan, the raid, however, was repulsed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burhan Nizam Shah III</span> South Asian monarch

Burhan Nizam Shah III was the ruler of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate from 1610 until his death in 1631.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adil Shahi–Portuguese conflicts</span>

Adil Shahi–Portuguese conflicts refers to the various armed engagements that took place in India between the Portuguese Empire and the Sultanate of Bijapur, ruled by the Adil Shahi dynasty, whose rulers were known to the Portuguese as Hidalcão.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deccani–Vijayanagar wars</span> Military conflicts between the Deccan Sultanates and the Vijayanagara empire

The Deccani–Vijayanagar wars were a series of wars between 1495 to 1678 that pitted the rival powers of the Deccan Sultanates against the Vijayanagar Empire. Over the course of approximately 120 years, these two entities engaged in a series of wars and skirmishes that were marked by significant displays of military strength and strategic maneuvering.

References

  1. Richards, John F. (1993). The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge history of India. Cambridge ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 137. ISBN   978-0-521-25119-8.
  2. 1 2 3 Gordon, Stewart (1993). The Marathas, 1600-1818. The new Cambridge history of India. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 45–47. ISBN   978-0-521-26883-7.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Chandra, Satish (2005). Medieval India: from Sultanat to the Mughals - Part II (Revised ed.). New Delhi: Har-Anand Publications. pp. 201–204. ISBN   978-81-241-1064-5.
  4. 1 2 3 Sadiq Ali, Shanti (1996). The African dispersal in the Deccan: from medieval to modern times. New Delhi: Orient Longman. pp. 101–103. ISBN   978-81-250-0485-1.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Radhey, Shyam (1966). The Kingdom of Ahmadnagar (1 ed.). Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 312–321. ISBN   978-81-208-2651-9.
  6. 1 2 3 Streusand, Douglas E. (2011). Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. pp. 227–228. ISBN   978-0-8133-1359-7.
  7. "Capture of Daulatabad Fort in 1633: a) Emperor Shah Jahan Watches the Assault on Daulatabad Fort; b) Capture of Daulatabad Fort, Folios from the Padshahnama (Chronicle of the King of the World) | LACMA Collections". collections.lacma.org. Retrieved 2024-06-13.
  8. 1 2 "Murar - The Siege of Daulatabad (April-June 1633)". www.rct.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-10.
  9. Sohoni, Pushkar (2018). The architecture of a Deccan sultanate: courtly practice and royal authority in late medieval India. Library of Islamic South Asia. London New York: I.B. Tauris. p. 72. ISBN   978-1-78673-419-8.
  10. Welch, Stuart Cary; Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), eds. (1987). The Emperors' album: images of Mughal India. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art : Distributed by Abrams. pp. 129 & 225. ISBN   978-0-87099-499-9.
  11. Gommans, Jos J. L. (2002). Mughal warfare: Indian frontiers and highroads to empire, 1500-1700. Warfare and history. London ; New York: Routledge. p. 32. ISBN   978-0-415-23988-2. OCLC   50400990.