Economy of the Mughal Empire

The Mughal Empire's economic prowess and sophisticated infrastructure played a pivotal role in shaping South Asia's history. While the Mughal Empire is conventionally said to have been founded in 1526 by Babur, ^[1] the Mughal imperial structure, however, is sometimes dated to 1600, to the rule of Babur's grandson, Akbar. ^[2] The economy in South Asia during the Mughal era increased in productivity compared to medieval times. ^[3] Mughal India's economy has been described as a form of proto-industrialization, an inspiration for the 18th-century putting-out system of Western Europe prior to the Industrial Revolution. ^[4] It was described as large and prosperous. ^[3] India under Mughal rule produced about 28% of the world's industrial output up until the 18th century with significant exports in textiles, shipbuilding, and steel, driving a strong export-driven economy. ^{[5] [6]} At the start of 17th century, the economic expansion within Mughal territories become the largest and surpassed the Qing dynasty and Europe. The share of the world's economy grew from 22.7% in 1600, which at the end of 16th century, had surpassed China to have the world's largest gross domestic product (GDP). ^{[7] [8]} Bengal Subah, the empire's wealthiest province, along contributed to 12% of GDP ^[9] and was a major hub for industries, contributing significantly to global trade and European imports, particularly in textiles and shipbuilding. ^[6]

The Mughals standardized the currency system introduced by Sher Shah Suri, maintaining high purity in their coins and largely relying on imported bullion due to strong exports, particularly from Bengal. The Mughals were also responsible for building an extensive road system and creating a uniform currency. ^{[10] : 185–204} The empire had an extensive road network, which was vital to the commercial infrastructure, built by a public works department set up by the Mughals which designed, constructed and maintained roads linking towns and cities across the empire, making trade easier to conduct. ^[3] In late 16th-century Mughal India, the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors contributed 52%, 18%, and 29% to the economy, respectively, with urban labor making up 18% of the workforce and contributing 52% to the economy. Grain wages were comparable to England's during the 16th and 17th centuries but fell behind in the 18th century, and per-capita income in terms of wheat was higher than early 20th-century British India. The main base of the empire's collective wealth was agricultural taxes, instituted by Akbar. ^{[11] [12]} These taxes, which amounted to well over half the output of a peasant cultivator, ^[13] were paid in the well-regulated silver currency, ^[14] and caused peasants and artisans to enter larger markets. ^[15]

Coinage

Square shaped silver rupee coin of Akbar, struck at the Lahore mint.

The Mughals adopted and standardised the rupee (rupiya, or silver), Mohur (gold) and dam (copper) currencies introduced by Sur Emperor Sher Shah Suri during his brief rule. ^[16] The currency was initially 48 dams to a single rupee in the beginning of Akbar's reign, before it later became 38 dams to a rupee in the 1580s, with the dam's value rising further in the 17th century as a result of new industrial uses for copper, such as in bronze cannons and brass utensils. The dam was initially the most common coin in Akbar's time, before being replaced by the rupee as the most common coin in succeeding reigns. ^[10] The dam's value was later worth 30 to a rupee towards the end of Jahangir's reign, and then 16 to a rupee by the 1660s. ^[17] The Mughals minted coins with high purity, never dropping below 96%, and without debasement until the 1720s. ^[18]

A coin issued by Emperor Jahangir, showing a fish motif.

Despite India having its own stocks of gold and silver, the Mughals produced minimal gold of their own, but mostly minted coins from imported bullion, as a result of the empire's strong export-driven economy, with global demand for Indian agricultural and industrial products drawing a steady stream of precious metals into India. ^[10] Around 80% of Mughal India's imports were bullion, mostly silver, ^[19] with major sources of imported bullion including the New World and Japan, ^[18] which in turn imported large quantities of textiles and silk from the Bengal Subah province. ^[10]

Labour

The historian Shireen Moosvi estimates that in terms of contributions to the Mughal economy, in the late 16th century, the primary sector contributed 52%, the secondary sector 18% and the tertiary sector 29%; the secondary sector contributed a higher percentage than in early 20th-century British India, where the secondary sector only contributed 11% to the economy. ^[20] In terms of urban-rural divide, 18% of Mughal India's labour force were urban and 82% were rural, contributing 52% and 48% to the economy, respectively. ^[21]

According to Stephen Broadberry and Bishnupriya Gupta, grain wages in India were comparable to England in the 16th and 17th centuries, but diverged in the 18th century when they fell to 20-40% of England's wages. ^{[22] [23]} This, however, is disputed by Parthasarathi and Sivramkrishna. Parthasarathi cites his estimates that grain wages for weaving and spinning in mid-18 century Bengal and South India was comparable to Britain. ^[24] Similarly, Sivramkrishna analysed agricultural surveys conducted in Mysore by Francis Buchanan during 1800–1801, arrived at estimates using a "subsistence basket" that aggregated millet income could be almost five times subsistence level, while corresponding rice income was three times that much. ^[25] That could be comparable to advance part of Europe. ^[26] Due to the scarcity of data, however, more research is needed before drawing any conclusion. ^{[27] [28]}

According to Moosvi, Mughal India had a per-capita income, in terms of wheat, 1.24% higher in the late 16th century than British India did in the early 20th century. ^[29] This income, however, would have to be revised downwards if manufactured goods, like clothing, would be considered. Compared to food per-capita, expenditure on clothing was much smaller though, so relative income between 1595 and 1596 should be comparable to 1901–1910. ^[30] However, in a system where wealth was hoarded by elites, wages were depressed for manual labour. ^[31] In Mughal India, there was a generally tolerant attitude towards manual labourers, with some religious cults in northern India proudly asserting a high status for manual labour. While slavery also existed, it was limited largely to household servants. ^[31]

Agriculture

Indian agricultural production increased under the Mughal Empire. ^[3] A variety of crops were grown, including food crops such as wheat, rice, and barley, and non-food cash crops such as cotton, indigo and opium. By the mid-17th century, Indian cultivators begun to extensively grow two new crops from the Americas, maize and tobacco. ^[3]

The Mughal administration emphasised agrarian reform, which began under the non-Mughal emperor Sher Shah Suri, the work of which Akbar adopted and furthered with more reforms. The civil administration was organised in a hierarchical manner on the basis of merit, with promotions based on performance. ^[32] The Mughal government funded the building of irrigation systems across the empire, which produced much higher crop yields and increased the net revenue base, leading to increased agricultural production. ^[3] From the late 17th century to the early 18th century, India accounted for 95% of British imports from Asia, and Bengal Subah province alone accounted for 40% of Dutch imports from Asia. ^[33]

A major Mughal reform introduced by Akbar was a new land revenue system called zabt. He replaced the tribute system, previously common in India and used by Tokugawa Japan at the time, with a monetary tax system based on a uniform currency. ^[18] The revenue system was biased in favour of higher value cash crops such as cotton, indigo, sugar cane, tree-crops, and opium, providing state incentives to grow cash crops, in addition to rising market demand. ^[10] Under the zabt system, the Mughals also conducted extensive cadastral surveying to assess the area of land under plow cultivation, with the Mughal state encouraging greater land cultivation by offering tax-free periods to those who brought new land under cultivation. ^[18] The expansion of agriculture and cultivation continued under later Mughal emperors including Aurangzeb, whose 1665 firman edict stated: "the entire elevated attention and desires of the Emperor are devoted to the increase in the population and cultivation of the Empire and the welfare of the whole peasantry and the entire people." ^[34]

Mughal agriculture was in some ways advanced compared to European agriculture at the time, exemplified by the common use of the seed drill among Indian peasants before its adoption in Europe. ^[35] While the average peasant across the world was only skilled in growing very few crops, the average Indian peasant was skilled in growing a wide variety of food and non-food crops, increasing their productivity. ^[36] Indian peasants were also quick to adapt to profitable new crops, such as maize and tobacco from the New World being rapidly adopted and widely cultivated across Mughal India between 1600 and 1650. Bengali farmers rapidly learned techniques of mulberry cultivation and sericulture, establishing Bengal Subah as a major silk-producing region of the world. ^[10] Sugar mills appeared in India shortly before the Mughal era. Evidence for the use of a draw bar for sugar-milling appears at Delhi in 1540, but may also date back earlier, and was mainly used in the northern Indian subcontinent. Geared sugar rolling mills first appeared in Mughal India, using the principle of rollers as well as worm gearing, by the 17th century. ^[37] The Mughal era sugar production also appeared by the foundings of archaeology evidence by Aligarh Muslim University in 2020 in Agra. ^[38]

According to economic historian Immanuel Wallerstein, citing evidence from Irfan Habib, Percival Spear, and Ashok Desai, per-capita agricultural output and standards of consumption in 17th-century Mughal India were probably higher than in 17th-century Europe and certainly higher than early 20th-century British India. ^[39] The increased agricultural productivity led to lower food prices. In turn, this benefited the Indian textile industry. Compared to Britain, the price of grain was about one-half in South India and one-third in Bengal, in terms of silver coinage. This resulted in lower silver coin prices for Indian textiles, giving them a price advantage in global markets. ^[40]

Diamond mining

See also: Golconda diamonds mining and trading

Diamond mine in the Golconda region 1725 CE from the collection of Pieter van der Aa—a Dutch publisher known for preparing maps and atlases.

India during Mughal rule has produced many legendary gems, including the Koh-i-Noor, Hope Diamond, Regent Diamond, Great Mogul Diamond, and the Orlov Diamond. ^[41] Particularly from the Diamond mining activities in Golconda, where, After the Siege of Golconda, Badshah Aurangzeb has acquired the diamond mining of Golconda. ^[42] After the conquest of Golconda, the diamond mines, which had been the Golconda Sultans famed source of wealth, had stopped functioning following the conquest of Hyderabad, but in 1692 mining was restarted in service of the Mughals. ^[43] Until the 17th century, mines in this region were the only source of diamonds on earth. ^[44] Mines was usually up to 4 fathoms (7.3 m; 24 ft) deep. ^{[45] [46]}

The testimonial proof of lucrative diamonds of Golconda are under the supervision of regional governors, of whom 17th-century prominent diamond trader Mir Jumla, who served as Grand vizier (Prime Minister) of the Golconda Sultanate, came to serve the Mughals. He established a network of diamond merchants in Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia up to China and the Malay Archipelago. ^{[47] [48] [49]} which Mir Jumla had his own ships and organised merchant fleets in the 1640s that sailed throughout Surat, Thatta, Arakan, Ayuthya, Balasore, Aceh, Melaka, Johore, Bantam, Makassar, Ceylon, Bandar Abbas, Mecca, Jeddah, Basra, Aden, Masqat, Mocha and the Maldives. ^[50] By his enormous wealth, he was able to recruit Pathans, Rajputs, Afghans and Mughals in his campaign to Bijapur in 1652. In 1653-1654, in one of Aurengzeb's letters to Shah Jahan, Aurengzeb cites a report of his agent Mohammad Amin where Mir Jumla is said to have maintained a force of 9000 Cavalry, 20000 infantry and his army filled with Iraqi and Arabi horses. ^{[51] [52]}

Shantidas Jhaveri, was also a diamond trader from this area during the era of Mughal rule. ^[45]

Industrial manufacturing

Up until 1750, India produced about 25% of the world's industrial output. ^[53] Manufactured goods and cash crops from the Mughal Empire were sold throughout the world. Key industries included textiles, shipbuilding, and steel. Processed products included cotton textiles, yarns, thread, silk, jute products, metalware, and foods such as sugar, oils and butter. ^[3] The growth of manufacturing industries in the Indian subcontinent during the Mughal era in the 17th–18th centuries has been referred to as a form of proto-industrialization, similar to 18th-century Western Europe prior to the Industrial Revolution. ^[4]

In early modern Europe, there was significant demand for products from Mughal India, particularly cotton textiles, as well as goods such as spices, peppers, indigo, silks, and saltpeter (for use in munitions). ^[3] European fashion, for example, became increasingly dependent on Mughal Indian textiles and silks. From the late 17th century to the early 18th century, Mughal India accounted for 95% of British imports from Asia, and the Bengal Subah province alone accounted for 40% of Dutch imports from Asia. ^[54] In contrast, there was very little demand for European goods in Mughal India, which was largely self-sufficient, thus Europeans had very little to offer, except for some woolens, unprocessed metals and a few luxury items. The trade imbalance caused Europeans to export large quantities of gold and silver to Mughal India in order to pay for South Asian imports. ^[3] Indian goods, especially those from Bengal, were also exported in large quantities to other Asian markets, such as Indonesia and Japan. ^[10]

Textile industry

See also: Muslin trade in Bengal and Mughal clothing

Miniature painting - Portrait of an Old Mughal Courtier Wearing Muslin

Muslim Lady Reclining or An Indian Girl with a Hookah, painted in Dacca, 18th century

The largest manufacturing industry in the Mughal Empire was textile manufacturing, particularly cotton textile manufacturing, which included the production of piece goods, calicos, and muslins, available unbleached and in a variety of colours. The cotton textile industry was responsible for a large part of the empire's international trade. ^[3] India had a 25% share of the global textile trade in the early 18th century. ^[55] Indian cotton textiles were the most important manufactured goods in world trade in the 18th century, consumed across the world from the Americas to Japan. ^[56] By the early 18th century, Mughal Indian textiles were clothing people across the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia, Europe, the Americas, Africa, and the Middle East. ^[57] The most important centre of cotton production was the Bengal province, particularly around its capital city of Dhaka. ^[58]

Bengal accounted for more than 50% of textiles and around 80% of silks imported by the Dutch from Asia, ^[54] Bengali silk and cotton textiles were exported in large quantities to Europe, Indonesia, and Japan, ^{[10] : 202} and Bengali muslin textiles from Dhaka were sold in Central Asia, where they were known as "Dhaka textiles". ^[58] Indian textiles dominated the Indian Ocean trade for centuries, were sold in the Atlantic Ocean trade, and had a 38% share of the West African trade in the early 18th century, while Indian calicos were a major force in Europe, and Indian textiles accounted for 20% of total English trade with Southern Europe in the early 18th century. ^[53]

The worm gear roller cotton gin, which was invented in India during the early Delhi Sultanate era of the 13th–14th centuries, came into use in the Mughal Empire sometime around the 16th century, ^[37] and is still used in India through to the present day. ^[59] Another innovation, the incorporation of the crank handle in the cotton gin, first appeared in India sometime during the late Delhi Sultanate or the early Mughal Empire. ^[60] The production of cotton, which may have largely been spun in the villages and then taken to towns in the form of yarn to be woven into cloth textiles, was advanced by the diffusion of the spinning wheel across India shortly before the Mughal era, lowering the costs of yarn and helping to increase demand for cotton. The diffusion of the spinning wheel, and the incorporation of the worm gear and crank handle into the roller cotton gin led to greatly expanded Indian cotton textile production during the Mughal era. ^[61]

Once, the Mughal emperor Akbar asked his courtiers, which was the most beautiful flower. Some said rose, from whose petals were distilled the precious attar, others, the lotus, glory of every Indian village. But Birbal said, “The cotton boll”. There was a scornful laughter and Akbar asked for an explanation. Birbal said, “Your Majesty, from the cotton boll comes the fine fabric prized by merchants across the seas that has made your empire famous throughout the world. The perfume of your fame far exceeds the scent of roses and jasmine. That is why I say the cotton boll is the most beautiful flower. ^[62]

Shipbuilding industry

Mughal India had a large shipbuilding industry, which was also largely centred in the Bengal province. Economic historian Indrajit Ray estimates shipbuilding output of Bengal during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries at 223,250 tons annually, compared with 23,061 tons produced in nineteen colonies in North America from 1769 to 1771. ^[63] He also assesses ship repairing as very advanced in Bengal. ^[63]

Indian shipbuilding, particularly in Bengal, was advanced compared to European shipbuilding at the time, with Indians selling ships to European firms. An important innovation in shipbuilding was the introduction of a flushed deck design in Bengal rice ships, resulting in hulls that were stronger and less prone to leak than the structurally weak hulls of traditional European ships built with a stepped deck design. The British East India Company later duplicated the flushed deck and hull designs of Bengal rice ships in the 1760s, leading to significant improvements in seaworthiness and navigation for European ships during the Industrial Revolution. ^[64]

Bengal Subah

See also: Muslin trade in Bengal

Ruins of the Great Caravanserai in Dhaka.

The province of Bengal was especially prosperous from the time of its takeover by the Mughals in 1590 until the British East India Company seized control in 1757. ^[65] It was the Mughal Empire's wealthiest province. ^[66] Domestically, much of India depended on Bengali products such as rice, silks and cotton textiles. Overseas, Europeans depended on Bengali products such as cotton textiles, silks, and opium; Bengal accounted for 40% of Dutch imports from Asia, for example, including more than 50% of textiles and around 80% of silks. ^[54] From Bengal, saltpeter was also shipped to Europe, opium was sold in Indonesia, raw silk was exported to Japan and the Netherlands, and cotton and silk textiles were exported to Europe, Indonesia and Japan. ^[10]

Akbar played a key role in establishing Bengal as a leading centre of commerce, as he began transforming many of the jungles there into farms. As soon as he conquered the region, he brought tools and men to clear jungles in order to expand cultivation and brought Sufis to open the jungles to farming. ^[34] Bengal was later described as the Paradise of Nations by Mughal emperors. ^[67] The Mughals introduced agrarian reforms, including the modern Bengali calendar. ^[68] The calendar played a vital role in developing and organising harvests, tax collection and Bengali culture in general, including the New Year and Autumn festivals.

The province was a leading producer of grains, salt, fruits, liquors and wines, precious metals and ornaments. ^{[69] [ page needed ]} Its handloom industry flourished under royal warrants, making the region a hub of the worldwide muslin trade, which peaked in the 17th and 18th centuries. The provincial capital Dhaka became the commercial capital of the empire. The Mughals expanded cultivated land in the Bengal delta under the leadership of Sufis, which consolidated the foundation of Bengali Muslim society. ^{[70] [ page needed ]}

After 150 years of rule by Mughal viceroys, Bengal gained semi-independence as a dominion under the Nawab of Bengal in 1717. The Nawabs permitted European companies to set up trading posts across the region, including firms from Britain, France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal and Austria. An Armenian community dominated banking and shipping in major cities and towns. The Europeans regarded Bengal as the richest place for trade. ^[69] By the late 18th century, the British displaced the Mughal ruling class in Bengal.

See also

• Economic history of India
• Economic history of the Indian subcontinent

References

1. Dale, Stephen F. (2018). Timurid Prince and Mughal Emperor . Philadelphia: Cambridge University press. ISBN   978-0-8133-1359-7.
2. Stein, Burton (2010), A History of India, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 159–, ISBN   978-1-4443-2351-1, archived from the original on 22 September 2023, retrieved 15 July 2019 Quote: "Another possible date for the beginning of the Mughal regime was 1600 when the institutions that defined the regime were set firmly in place and when the heartland of the empire was defined; both of these were the accomplishment of Babur's grandson Akbar."
3. Schmidt, Karl J. (2015). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Routledge. p. 100. ISBN   978-1-317-47681-8.
4. Roy, Tirthankar (2010). "The Long Globalization and Textile Producers in India". In Lex Heerma van Voss; Els Hiemstra-Kuperus; Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk (eds.). The Ashgate Companion to the History of Textile Workers, 1650–2000. Ashgate Publishing. p. 255. ISBN   978-0-7546-6428-4.
5. Jeffrey G. Williamson & David Clingingsmith, India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries Archived 29 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine , Global Economic History Network, London School of Economics
6. Maddison, Angus (25 September 2003). Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics. OECD Publishing. pp. 256–259. ISBN   978-92-64-10414-3.
7. Maddison, Angus (2006). The World Economy Volumes 1–2. Development Center of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. p. 639. doi:10.1787/456125276116. ISBN   9264022619.
8. Matthews, Chris (5 October 2014). "The 5 most dominant economic empires of all time". Fortune. Retrieved 18 August 2016.
9. Pawan Singh (8 February 2022). Bangladesh And Pakistan Flirting With Failure In South Asia (ebook). Gaurav Book Centre Pvt. Limited. p. 12. ISBN   9789387657014 . Retrieved 3 December 2023.
10. Richards, John F. (1995). The Mughal Empire. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-56603-2.
11. Stein, Burton (2010). A History of India. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 164–. ISBN   978-1-4443-2351-1. Quote: "The resource base of Akbar’s new order was land revenue"
12. Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2006). India Before Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 158–. ISBN   978-0-521-80904-7. Quote: "The Mughal empire was based in the interior of a large land-mass and derived the vast majority of its revenues from agriculture."
13. Stein, Burton (2010), A History of India, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 164–, ISBN   978-1-4443-2351-1 Quote: "... well over half of the output from the fields in his realm, after the costs of production had been met, is estimated to have been taken from the peasant producers by way of official taxes and unofficial exactions. Moreover, payments were exacted in money, and this required a well regulated silver currency."
14. Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2006), India Before Europe, Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–, ISBN   978-0-521-80904-7
15. Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2006), India Before Europe, Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–, ISBN   978-0-521-80904-7 Quote: "His stipulation that land taxes be paid in cash forced peasants into market networks, where they could obtain the necessary money, while the standardization of imperial currency made the exchange of goods for money easier."
16. "Picture of original Mughal rupiya introduced by Sher Shah Suri". Archived from the original on 5 October 2002. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
17. Irfan Habib; Dharma Kumar; Tapan Raychaudhuri (1987). The Cambridge Economic History of India (PDF). Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 464.
18. Richards, John F. (2003). The Unending Frontier: An Environmental History of the Early Modern World. University of California Press. pp. 27–. ISBN   978-0-520-93935-6.
19. Tracy, James D. (1997). The Political Economy of Merchant Empires: State Power and World Trade, 1350–1750. Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–. ISBN   978-0-521-57464-8.
20. Moosvi 2015, p. 433.
21. Maddison, Angus (1971). Class Structure and Economic Growth: India and Pakistan Since the Moghuls. Taylor & Francis. p. 33. ISBN   978-0-415-38259-5.
22. Broadberry, Gupta, Stephen, Bishnupriya (2003). "The Early Modern Great Divergence: Wages, Prices and Economic Development in Europe and Asia 1500–1800" (PDF). p. 34.
23. Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011). Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850. p. 42.
24. Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011). Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850. p. 39.
25. Sivramkrishna, Sashi (2009). "Ascertaining Living Standards in Erstwhile Mysore, Southern India, from Francis Buchanan's Journey of 1800–01: An Empirical Contribution to the Great Divergence". Journal of the Economic and Social History. 52 (4): 726.
26. Sivramkrishna, Sashi (2009). "Ascertaining Living Standards in Erstwhile Mysore, Southern India, from Francis Buchanan's Journey of 1800–01: An Empirical Contribution to the Great Divergence". Journal of the Economic and Social History. 52 (4): 731.
27. Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011). Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850. p. 45.
28. Sivramkrishna, Sashi (2009). "Ascertaining Living Standards in Erstwhile Mysore, Southern India, from Francis Buchanan's Journey of 1800–01: An Empirical Contribution to the Great Divergence". Journal of the Economic and Social History. 52 (4): 729.
29. Moosvi 2015, p. 432.
30. Moosvi 2015, p. 450.
31. Moosvi, Shireen (December 2011). "The World of Labour in Mughal India (c. 1500–1750)". International Review of Social History. 56 (S19): 245–261. doi: 10.1017/S0020859011000526 .
32. Pagaza, Ignacio; Argyriades, Demetrios (2009). Winning the Needed Change: Saving Our Planet Earth. IOS Press. p. 129. ISBN   978-1-58603-958-5.
33. Om Prakash, "Empire, Mughal", History of World Trade Since 1450, edited by John J. McCusker, vol. 1, Macmillan Reference US, 2006, pp. 237–240, World History in Context. Retrieved 3 August 2017
34. Ludden, David (1999). An Agrarian History of South Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 96. ISBN   978-0-521-36424-9.
35. Irfan Habib; Dharma Kumar; Tapan Raychaudhuri (1987). The Cambridge Economic History of India (PDF). Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 214.
36. Irfan Habib; Dharma Kumar; Tapan Raychaudhuri (1987). The Cambridge Economic History of India (PDF). Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 217.
37. Irfan Habib (2011), Economic History of Medieval India, 1200–1500, p. 53, Pearson Education
38. "Mughal-era stone sugar mill unearthed". Erulearning by the Times Internet's Spotlight team. The times of India. 2020. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
39. Suneja, Vivek (2000). Understanding Business: A Multidimensional Approach to the Market Economy. Psychology Press. p. 13. ISBN   978-0-415-23857-1.
40. Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011), Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–45, ISBN   978-1-139-49889-0
41. Detailed Information Dossier on Diamond in India, 2011, India Geological Survey, p.22, 124.
42. Muzaffar H. Syed (2022). History of Indian Nation : Medieval India (ebook). K. K. Publications. p. 160. Retrieved 23 August 2023.
43. Richards 1975a, p. 209-214.
44. Accum, Michael Coulson (2012). The History of Mining: The events, technology and people involved in the industry that forged the modern world. Harriman House Limited. pp. 75–77. ISBN   978-0-85719-266-0 . Retrieved 17 August 2022.
45. Mehta, Makrand (1991). Indian Merchants and Entrepreneurs in Historical Perspective: With Special Reference to Shroffs of Gujarat, 17th to 19th Centuries. Academic Foundation. pp. 96–102. ISBN   9788171880171 . Retrieved 17 August 2022.
46. Accum, Friedrich Christian (1808). System of Theoretical and Practical Chemistry. Vol. 1. Kimber and Conrad. pp. 208–210. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
47. Mahmood, Parvez (12 April 2019). "Persian adventurer in India". The Friday times. Retrieved 23 September 2022.
48. Konwar, Paranan (2019). "Mir Jumla's invasion of Assam (1662–63), war experience of a Dutch sailor Heiden and Translator Glanius". Indian Historical Review. 46. Department of Economics, Sonari College, Assam, India.: 41–54. doi:10.1177/0376983619856149. S2CID   200082670 . Retrieved 23 September 2022.
49. Mahmood, Parvez (19 April 2019). "Persian adventurer in India". The Friday times. Retrieved 23 September 2022.
50. Pearson, M. (2007). The Indian Ocean. Routledge. ISBN   9780415445382 . Retrieved 21 April 2015.
51. Sarkar (1979). "Mir Jumla's Army". Of Mir Jumla: General Of Aurangzeb. New Delhi: Rajesh Publications. pp.  80-81.
52. Flynn, V J A, ed. (1971), "Letter 46", English translation of Adab-I-Alamgiri, p. 317
53. Jeffrey G. Williamson, David Clingingsmith (August 2005). "India's Deindustrialization in the 18th and 19th Centuries" (PDF). Harvard University . Retrieved 18 May 2017.
54. Prakash, Om (2006). McCusker, John J. (ed.). History of World Trade Since 1450. Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 237–40. ISBN   978-0-02-865840-7.
55. Angus Maddison (1995), Monitoring the World Economy, 1820–1992, OECD, p. 30
56. Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011), Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850, Cambridge University Press, p. 2, ISBN   978-1-139-49889-0
57. Jeffrey G. Williamson (2011). Trade and Poverty: When the Third World Fell Behind. MIT Press. p. 91. ISBN   978-0-262-29518-5.
58. Richard Maxwell Eaton (1996), The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760, p. 202, University of California Press
59. Lakwete, Angela (2003). Inventing the Cotton Gin: Machine and Myth in Antebellum America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1–6. ISBN   978-0-8018-7394-2.
60. Irfan Habib (2011), Economic History of Medieval India, 1200–1500, pp. 53–54, Pearson Education
61. Irfan Habib (2011). Economic History of Medieval India, 1200–1500. Pearson Education. p. 54. ISBN   9788131727911.
62. دكتور محمد نصر. Fashion And Designing Under The Mughals Akbar To Aurangzeb. A Historical Perspective.
63. Ray, Indrajit (2011). Bengal Industries and the British Industrial Revolution (1757–1857). Routledge. p. 174. ISBN   978-1-136-82552-1.
64. "Technological Dynamism in a Stagnant Sector: Safety at Sea during the Early Industrial Revolution" (PDF).
65. Roy, Tirthankar (November 2011). "Where is Bengal? Situating an Indian Region in the Early Modern World Economy". Past & Present (213): 115–146. doi:10.1093/pastj/gtr009.
66. Alam, M. Shahid (2016). Poverty From The Wealth of Nations: Integration and Polarization in the Global Economy since 1760. Springer Science+Business Media. p. 32. ISBN   978-0-333-98564-9.
67. "The paradise of nations". Dhaka Tribune.
68. Daniyal, Shoaib. "Bengali New Year: how Akbar invented the modern Bengali calendar". Scroll.in.
69. Nanda, J. N. (2005). Bengal: The Unique State. Concept Publishing Company. ISBN   978-81-8069-149-2.
70. Eaton, Richard M. (1996). The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760. University of California Press. ISBN   978-0-520-20507-9.

Further reading

• Chaudhuri, K.N. (1978), "Some Reflections on the Town and Country in Mughal India", Modern Asian Studies, 12 (1): 77–96, doi:10.1017/s0026749x00008155, JSTOR   311823, S2CID   146558617
• Habib, Irfan. Atlas of the Mughal Empire: Political and Economic Maps (1982).
• Habib, Irfan. Agrarian System of Mughal India (1963, revised edition 1999).
• Heesterman, J.C. (2004), "The Social Dynamics of the Mughal Empire: A Brief Introduction", Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 47 (3): 292–297, doi:10.1163/1568520041974729, JSTOR   25165051
• Khan, Iqtidar Alam (1976), "The Middle Classes in the Mughal Empire", Social Scientist, 5 (1): 28–49, doi:10.2307/3516601, JSTOR   3516601
• Moosvi, Shireen (2015) [First published 1987]. The economy of the Mughal Empire, c. 1595: a statistical study (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-908549-1.
• Rothermund, Dietmar. An Economic History of India: From Pre-Colonial Times to 1991 (1993)
• Richards, John F. (1975a), Mughal Administration in Golconda, Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press, ISBN   0-19-821561-4, OCLC   2932290