Supreme Court of Honduras

Last updated
Building of the Supreme Court in Tegucigalpa. Corte Suprema de Justicia de Honduras.jpg
Building of the Supreme Court in Tegucigalpa.

The Supreme Court of Honduras (Spanish : Corte Suprema de Justicia de Honduras; CSJ) is the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Honduras. The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in Honduras.


Structure, power, and duties

There are four chambers — civil, criminal, constitutional, and labor [1] — with a certain number of justices assigned to each chamber as established in the 316th article of the Constitution. [2] [3] It has fourteen constitutional powers and duties, including: [4]

  1. Organize and direct the Judiciary;
  2. Knowledge of legal proceedings involving senior officials of State, when the National Congress has declared to lead to formation of the facts;
  3. Identifying the second instance of matters Courts Appeals have met in the first instance;
  4. To hear extradition cases and the other to be judged according to international law;
  5. To hear appeals under, review and unconstitutional under this constitution and the Law;
  6. Authorize the exercise of notary who have obtained the law degree;
  7. Meet the preliminary hearing at first instance against the Judges of the Appellate Courts;
  8. To appoint and dismiss judges and judges on a proposal Council of the Judiciary;
  9. Publish the Judicial Laws (Gaceta Judicial);
  10. Prepare the draft budget of the judiciary and send to Congress;
  11. To set the division of territory for jurisdictional purposes;
  12. Create, delete, merge or transfer the Courts, Courts Appeals and other units of the Judiciary;
  13. To issue its own internal regulations and other necessary things to fulfill their duties and;
  14. The other powers conferred by the Constitution and Laws.


The court has 15 Judges: [5] [6]

Election Process

The process of selecting new members of the Supreme Court of Honduras is sui generis, involving the participation of various sectors of civil society. Judges are elected by the National Congress from a list of candidates proposed by a 7-member Nominating Board consisting of: [7] [8] [9]

  1. A representative of the Supreme Court elected by the votes of two thirds of the judges;
  2. A representative of the Honduran Bar Association, elected in Assembly;
  3. The Honduran Commissioner for Human Rights;
  4. A representative of the Honduran Council of Private Enterprise (COHEP), elected in Assembly;
  5. A representative of the faculty of the School of Law, whose proposal will be made through the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH);
  6. A representative elected by civil society organizations; and
  7. A representative of the trade unions.

Each entity submits a list of twenty candidates to a “Nominating Panel, of 7 members, each representing one nominating entity, which scrutinizes the qualifications of each submitted nominee on the 7 nomination lists (140 total), and any “self-nominated” candidates. [9] The Nominating Panel selects 45 of these candidates to be included in a nomination list submitted to Congress. [9] The National Congress selects the new 15 Supreme Court members from this list. [9]


2008-2009 Supreme Court election crisis

Following months of political wrangling that dominated news in Honduras, the National Congress selected 15 new judges to ascend to the Supreme Court of Justice shortly before midnight on January 25, 2009, as the previous court’s term was set to expire that same day. [9] The final issue was an attempt by the executive branch to re-elect a sitting member of the court who wasn’t on the slate of 45 candidates, Sonia Marlina Dubón de Flores. [9]

The standoff included alleged threats from Defense Minister Arístides Mejía to surround the congressional building with tanks should members fail to comply with the request to reseat Dubón. [9] An angry retort from President of the National Congress Roberto Micheletti, who said that the legislature abided by democracy and rule of law, not military threats or pressure. [9] Mejía later denied making such threats. [9]

President Manuel Zelaya appeared before Congress shortly after the standoff to quell rumors started by National Party opponents that he was attempting a coup over the issue. [9] Finally, the two majority parties in Congress decided to split the court between eight Liberal Party and seven National Party candidates — a switch from the previous court, in which the National Party held a one-member majority. [9]

The Democratic Unification (or Unified Democracy) and Innovation and Unity parties abstained from the final vote in protest of the system used to select the court. Instead of voting on a block of candidates pre-selected by the two majority parties, they would have preferred to vote on each candidate individually. Unified Democracy Congresswoman Doris Gutiérrez lamented the low numbers of women, saying, “We now have a scant 20 percent of women on the court, where we’ve always had seven or eight [of 15].” Human Rights Commissioner Ramon Custodio and several evangelical leaders said the new court would be less partisan and politicized than it had been in the past, despite Congress' final selection method. U.S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens called the selection "a great step forward for democracy, the judiciary and transparency in Honduras." [10]

The fifteen members of the Supreme Court are appointed by agreement between the two main political parties for a seven year term. An organization claims that the highest judicial offices still being distributed between the two main parties. [11] By requiring them to be re-elected by the National Congress it makes them subject to policies of their sponsoring party. [12] Eight of the judges were selected by the Liberal Party and seven by the National Party.

An international mission in 2008, organized by the International Commission of Jurists and the Due Process of Law Foundation, admired the inclusive nature of the selection process, but received information from multiple sources about alleged irregularities in the elaboration of certain lists, and information concerning alleged political influence, which might serve to undermine the selection process. [9] The Mission verified widespread distrust in the selection process, more specifically, a belief that the candidate lists are a result of political and powerful interest groups interferences. [9] The Mission recognized the interest expressed by, and opening up of, many key actors and groups within the Honduran society towards the selection process and invited the international community to become more involved and to promote a transparent process that leads to the selection of justices with the stature required by a Supreme Court. [9]

2009 Honduran constitutional crisis

On 27 May 2009, the Administrative Law Tribunal issued an injunction against holding the poll at the request of the Honduran Attorney General Luis Alberto Rubi. On 16 June the Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the 27 May injunction. On 18 June, the Administrative Law Tribunal ordered Zelaya to comply with the ruling in writing within five days. On 26 June, the Supreme Court unanimously found that the Presidency had not complied with the 18 June court order and issued a sealed order to detain President Manuel Zelaya for the purposes of taking a statement. [13] [14] [15] [16] This precipitated some of the most dramatic events of the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis.

The court was criticized by several UN experts for the dismissal of several judges in relation to the crisis. [17] They noted the dismissals appeared related only to the public expression of opposition to events during the crisis and that the accused judges were not given the opportunity to participate in the proceedings.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Ecuador</span> Political system of Ecuador

The politics of Ecuador are multi-party. The central government polity is a quadrennially elected presidential, unicameral representative democracy. The President of Ecuador is head of state and head of the army on a multi-party system, and leads a cabinet with further executive power. Legislative power is not limited to the National Assembly, as it may to a lesser degree be exercised by the executive which consists of the President convening an appointed executive cabinet. Subsequent acts of the National Assembly are supreme over Executive Orders where sufficient votes have been cast by the legislators. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature. Ecuador is also considered a constitutional republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Guatemala</span> Political system of Guatemala

Politics of Guatemala takes place in a framework of a presidential representative democratic republic, where by the President of Guatemala is both head of state, head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the Congress of the Republic. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature. Guatemala is a Constitutional Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Honduras</span> Political system of Honduras

Politics of Honduras takes place in a framework of a multi-party system presidential representative democratic republic. The President of Honduras is both head of state and head of government. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in the National Congress of Honduras. The party system is dominated by the conservative National Party of Honduras, the Liberal Party of Honduras, and Liberty and Refoundation.

The government of the U.S. state of Missouri is organized into the state government and local government, including county government, and city and municipal government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colombian Constitution of 1991</span> Colombias current Constitution

The Political Constitution of Colombia of 1991, is the Constitution of the Republic of Colombia. It was promulgated in Constitutional Gazette number 114 on Thursday, July 4, 1991, and is also known as the Constitution of Human Rights. It replaced the Political Constitution of 1886 and was issued during the presidency of the liberal César Gaviria, with ideas from the also liberal Luis Carlos Galán.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Argentina</span> Highest court in Argentina

The Supreme Court of Argentina, officially known as the Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Nation, is the highest court of law of the Argentine Republic. It was inaugurated on 15 January 1863. However, during much of the 20th century, the Court and the Argentine judicial system in general, lacked autonomy from the executive power. The Court was reformed in 2003 by the decree 222/03.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Council of the Judiciary</span>

The General Council of the Judiciary is the national council of the judiciary of Spain. It is the constitutional body that governs all the Judiciary of Spain, such as courts, and judges, as it is established by the Spanish Constitution of 1978, article 122 and developed by the Organic Law 6/1985 of the Judicial Power (LOPJ). The President of the CGJP is also the president of the Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Bolivia</span> Supreme law of Bolivia

The current Constitution of Bolivia came into effect on 7 February 2009 when it was promulgated by President Evo Morales, after being approved in a referendum with 90.24% participation. The referendum was held on 25 January 2009, with the constitution being approved by 61.43% of voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia</span> Highest judicial authority in Colombia

The Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia in Bogotá is the highest judicial body in civil and penal matters and issues of criminal and civil procedure in Colombia. The Supreme Court of Colombia is the highest authority in regard to the interpretation of administrative law, constitutional law, and the administration of the judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roberto Micheletti</span> Interim president of Honduras following the 2009 coup until 2010

Roberto Micheletti Baín is a Honduran politician who served as the interim de facto president of Honduras from 28 June 2009 to 27 January 2010 as a result of the 2009 Honduran coup d'état. The Honduran military ousted the President, and the National Congress read a letter of resignation, which was refuted two minutes later by Zelaya in conversation with CNN en Español; days later, the coup-plotters claimed that the Supreme Court had ordered to forcefully detain President Manuel Zelaya because "he was violating the Honduran constitution"; Zelaya was exiled rather than arrested. Micheletti, constitutionally next in line for the presidency, was sworn in as president by the National Congress a few hours after Zelaya was sent into exile by the Honduran military. He was not acknowledged as de jure president by any government or international organization. The 2009 general election took place as planned in November and elected Porfirio Lobo Sosa to succeed Micheletti.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Spain</span>

The Judiciary of Spain consists of Courts and Tribunals, composed of judges and magistrates (Justices), who have the power to administer justice in the name of the King of Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador</span>

The Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador is the highest court of El Salvador. The court sits in San Salvador. The current president is Judge José Belarmino Jaime, who has held the position for three consecutive terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Honduran coup d'état</span> 2009 deposition of Honduran President Manuel Zelaya by the military

The 2009 Honduran coup d'état, part of the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis, occurred when the Honduran Army on 28 June 2009 followed orders from the Honduran Supreme Court to oust President Manuel Zelaya and send him into exile. Zelaya had attempted to schedule a non-binding poll on holding a referendum on convening a constituent assembly to write a new constitution. Zelaya refused to comply with court orders to cease, and the Honduran Supreme Court issued a secret warrant for his arrest dated 26 June. Two days later, Honduran soldiers stormed the president's house in the middle of the night and detained him, forestalling the poll. Instead of bringing him to trial, the army put him on a military aeroplane and flew him to Costa Rica. Later that day, after the reading of a resignation letter of disputed authenticity, the Honduran Congress voted to remove Zelaya from office, and appointed Head of Congress Roberto Micheletti, his constitutional successor, to replace him and finish his term. It was the first coup to occur in the country since 1978.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal government of Mexico</span> National government of the United Mexican States

The Federal government of Mexico is the national government of the United Mexican States, the central government established by its constitution to share sovereignty over the republic with the governments of the 31 individual Mexican states, and to represent such governments before international bodies such as the United Nations. The Mexican federal government has three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial and functions per the Constitution of the United Mexican States, as enacted in 1917, and as amended. The executive power is exercised by the executive branch, which is headed by the president and his Cabinet, which, together, are independent of the legislature. Legislative power is vested upon the Congress of the Union, a bicameral legislature comprising the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies. Judicial power is exercised by the judiciary, consisting of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, the Council of the Federal Judiciary, and the collegiate, unitary, and district courts.

Honduras: Constitutional Law Issues is a controversial and disputed legal opinion report commissioned by Congressman Aaron Schock, prepared by Senior Foreign Law Specialist Norma Gutiérrez, and published by the U.S. Law Library of Congress. It features a legal analysis of the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis with a specific examination of the legality of President Manuel Zelaya's 28 June 2009 removal from office and expatriation.

The Guaymuras dialogue – Tegucigalpa/San José accord is a diplomatic agreement made between two rival political factions in Honduras during the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis. Representatives from the de facto Micheletti government and deposed President Manuel Zelaya reached the agreement after several weeks of diplomatic dialogue in late around 2009

The cuarta urna or fourth ballot box referendum was a plan by Honduran president Manuel Zelaya to run a non-binding referendum to consult the public regarding the administration of a second, binding referendum to convoke a constitutional assembly. The referendum was planned to run concurrently with the November 2009 presidential, congressional, and mayoral elections. Some Hondurans opposed the plan, including many politicians from the two largest parties. When Zelaya pushed ahead with plans for this referendum on whether to include a fourth ballot box, the Supreme Court issued a warrant for his arrest and the army expelled him from the country in a June 28 coup d'etat, precipitating the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal government of Brazil</span> Executive authority of Brazil

The Federal Government of Brazil is the national government of the Federative Republic of Brazil, a republic in South America divided in 26 states and a federal district. The Brazilian federal government is divided in three branches: the executive, which is headed by the President and the cabinet; the legislative, whose powers are vested by the Constitution in the National Congress; and the judiciary, whose powers are vested in the Supreme Federal Court and lower federal courts. The seat of the federal government is located in Brasília.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Uruguay</span>

The Supreme Court of Uruguay is the highest court of law and last resort in the Oriental Republic of Uruguay. It serves as the highest appeals court, and appoints and oversees all other judges. Established on 28 October 1907, it is housed in the Palacio Piria, a masterpiece of eclectic architecture from 1917.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic</span>

The Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic is the highest court existing in the Republic and is, therefore, the head of the judiciary in the country.


  1. "Integradas las 4 salas de la Corte Suprema". (in Spanish). 2009-01-27. Archived from the original on 2009-02-02. Retrieved 2009-08-05.
  2. Constitution of Honduras, Article 316
  3. "Honduras - Judiciary".
  4. Constitution of Honduras, Article 313
  5. Constitution of Honduras, Article 308
  6. "Honduras elige a magistrados de la Corte Suprema de Justicia" [Honduras elects Supreme Court magistrates] (in Spanish). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2023-02-25.
  7. Constitution of Honduras, Article 311
  8. "National Congress of Honduras Decree No. 140-2001". La Gaceta (Honduras) . Library of Congress / Global Legal Information Network. 5 October 2001.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 "Misión de Observación del proceso de selección de los nuevos miembros de la Corte Suprema de Honduras" (PDF) (in Spanish and English). Fundación para el Debido Proceso Legal. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-02-25. Retrieved 2009-07-09.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. "Honduras News in Review—Jan. 15-30, 2009". May I Speak Freely?.
  11. "International Commission of Jurists". Archived from the original on 2009-12-25. Retrieved 2009-11-09.
  12. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-17. Retrieved 2009-11-09.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  13. Lacey, Marc (2009-07-02). "Leader's Ouster Not a Coup, Says the Honduran Military". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-07-02.
  14. "Orden de captura contra Zelaya". Corte Suprema de Justica, Honduras. 2009-06-26.
  15. "letter to: Senor jefe del estado mayor conjunto de las fuerzas armadas..." (PDF-1.4). Libertad Digital. 2009-07-02. Archived from the original on 2009-08-23. Retrieved 2009-08-23.; creation timestamp contained in PDF-1.4 file is "20090207105728+02'00'" and is listed here bibliographically as 2009-07-02, since an ISO 8601 date in displayed version of the file: 2009-06-26
  16. "Honduras Supreme Court Judge Defends President Ouster (Update1)". Bloomberg. 2009-07-01.
  17. "Despido de jueces en Honduras envía mensaje intimidatorio al Poder Judicial, advierten expertos de la ONU". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 29 July 2010.