Tara Brooch

Last updated

Tara Brooch
Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 02.jpg
Materialsilver, gold, glass, enamel, amber, copper
Sizediameter: 8.7 cm (3.4 in), length: 32 cm (13 in)
Weight224.36 g (7.914 oz) [1]
Createdlate-7th or early-8th century
Discovered1850 (reportedly)
Bettystown
Present location National Museum of Ireland, Dublin
IdentificationNMI, R. 4015
Reverse of the brooch Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 03.jpg
Reverse of the brooch

The Tara Brooch is an Irish Celtic brooch, dated to the late-7th or early-8th century. It is of the pseudo-penannular type (with a fully closed head or hoop), [n 1] and made from bronze, silver and gold. Its head consists of an intricately decorated circular ring, and overall, its front and reverse sides are equally decorated; each holds around 50 inserted cast panels packed with filigree. The brooch was constructed from numerous individually made pieces; all of the borders and its terminals contain multiple panels holding multi-coloured studs, interlace patterns, filigree, and Celtic spirals. The brooch is widely considered the most complex and ornate of its kind and would have been commissioned as a fastener for the cloak of a high-ranking cleric or as ceremonial insignia of high office for a High King of Ireland.

Contents

The brooch was hidden on the east coast of Ireland some time during the 11th or 12th century, most likely to protect it from Viking or Norman invaders. It was re-discovered around 1850, but the exact find-spot and circumstances are unknown. Despite its title, it was not found at the Hill of Tara but on or near the beach around Bettystown on the coast of County Meath. The name by which it became known was chosen by its first commercial owner, the Dublin-based jeweler George Waterhouse, as a marketing ploy for selling copies during the height of the 19th century Celtic Revival. For this reason, many art historians describe it with inverted commas as the "Tara" brooch. [3]

Its decoration and ornamentation are so detailed and minute that parts can only be fully seen using magnification, leading to one 19th-century critic writing that it was "more like the work of fairies than of human beings". [4] Art historians see only the contemporary Hunterston Brooch (c.700 AD) as an equal in craftsmanship and design. The archaeologist Niamh Whitfield called it "the most ornate and intricate piece of medieval jewellery ever found in Ireland", [5] while the NMI describes it as representing "the pinnacle of early medieval Irish metalworkers’ achievement". [6] It was acquired by the Royal Irish Academy in 1868, and transferred to the National Museum of Ireland in 1890 where it remains on permanent display.

Function

Mosaic of Justinianus I - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg
Detail of a 6th century mosaic of Justinian I, Basilica of San Vitale
John Romilly Allen sketch 1894.jpg
Sketch of a figure wearing a brooch. From an Irish High cross

The Tara brooch was likely made for a High King of Ireland or a dignitary or cleric, probably from the Kingdom of Brega, a branch of the Uí Néills, who ruled over much of today's Leinster. The owner would have worn it on ceremonial occasions. [7] [8]

Gilt and silver zoomorphic brooches were status symbols in Early Medieval Ireland and Britain. The format is derived from the earlier tradition of torcs and gorgets (both types of neck-rings). By the 7th century, Irish kings had adopted the late Roman Empire use of brooches to fulfill this purpose. The tradition continued into the Byzantine empire; mosaics in the Basilica of San Vitale show the emperor Justinian (b. 482) wearing a brooch on an imperial purple cloak. [7] Fully-sealed brooches were fashioned by rotating the pin within the gap by 90 degrees. [9]

Gorgets on display at the NMI Gold collars ( 800-700 BC) from from Tonyhill in Co Limerick (left) and Co Clare (right).jpg
Gorgets on display at the NMI

Penannular broochs were too small to have been pushed through cloth. [4] Instead, they were likely fixed in place by pushing the pin-shaft through the cloth, and fastened horizontally behind the head with stitches running through loops on the borders, and further secured by wrapping the chain around the pin. [10] [11]

Depictions in illuminated manuscripts indicate that highly quality brooches generally placed over purple dye cloaks (brats in Gaelic) [12] just below the right shoulder. [n 2] [7] Positioning them below the right shoulder was another tradition that originated from the Romans, whose military placed it there so as to keep their cloak on the left and not impede access to their sword. [12]

Dating

The Hunterston Brooch, silver mounted with gold, silver and amber decoration. c. 700 AD NMSHunterstonBrooch1 (cropped).jpg
The Hunterston Brooch, silver mounted with gold, silver and amber decoration. c.700 AD

Penannular brooches appear in Ireland from the 5th century, presumably made by craftsmen working in Roman Britain traditions. Surviving Irish brooches became more elaborate than Anglo-Saxon examples from the mid-9th century. The extant Irish examples have silver rather than bronze bases, as well as more decorated pinheads, a wider variety of inlay material such as red gold, amber, enamel, millefiori and glass, and larger terminals which had become the focal point for decoration. [2] Goldsmithing was a prominent craft in prehistoric Irish society. Through 7th century trade and missionary contacts with Anglo-Saxon, Frankish and Lombardic cultures, Irish craftsmen developed sophistication in goldwork and adopted the style sometimes referred to by historians as "Hiberno-Saxon" or "late Celtic". [14]

Monogram from the Lindisfarne Gospels, c. 715-720 LindisfarneChiRiho (cropped).jpg
Monogram from the Lindisfarne Gospels, c.715–720

The Tara brooch is usually dated to the late–7th or early 8th century, [14] based on technical analysis and stylistic comparisons, in particular to its similarities to the Hunterston Brooch, produced in either Ireland or western Scotland at the turn of the 8th century, and the Lindisfarne Gospels produced in Northumberland in the early 8th century. [n 3] [15] [16] [17] In the late 19th century, the antiquarian Margaret Stokes was the first to observe that the use of trumpet spirals places it at least at the end of the so-called "Golden Age" of Insular art, given that the design had fallen out of use by 1050. [18] Common elements between the Hunterston and Tara brooches and the Lindisfarne Gospels include curvilinear patterns and renderings of animal and birds in interlace. [19] Archeologists think the workshops behind these objects were in contact and sharing techniques and design ideas. [17]

The Irish style drew influence from Anglo-Saxon formats and the chip carving and inlay methods of Germanic polychrome jewelry. [20] [21] In addition, by the 7th century, Irish missionaries had become exposed to Central European and Mediterranean cultures. [12] Whitfield has noted that Ireland was then relatively outward-looking and cosmopolitan – compared to the later Middle Ages – and that "it is not surprising that it should have produced jewels which reflected European fashions". [16]

Description

General view of the front side Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 01.jpg
General view of the front side

The Tara Brooch is widely considered the most elaborately constructed and decorated surviving Insular object, with metalwork that exceeds in richness of ornamentation both the 8th century Ardagh and early 9th century Derrynaflan chalices [22] It is older than both, and one of the earliest Insular metalwork pieces to depict animals in the zoomorphic style that became widespread in Irish art between the 8th and late 12th centuries. [23] It is larger than most other Celtic brooches: the hoop is unusually large with a maximum diameter of 8.7 cm (3.4 in) while the pin is relatively long at 32 cm (13 in).

The brooch of the pseudo-penannular type, in that the hoop is fully circular but does not have a gap between its terminals through which a fastening pin could pass. [24] It is bilaterally symmetrical [25] with a basic structure of a circular hook, semi-circular and linked terminals, a long pin, and a string likely used for additional support to keep it in place against the wearers cloth. [26] Although its core made of silver, its surface is so highly gilded and decorated that the silver is barely visible. [27]

It is composed of many individually formed pieces, with most of its filigree decorations inserted into small trays. Eighteen of these inserts survive, out of a total of twenty-eight trays. [23] [25]

The brooch's complex geometry includes concentric and ancillary circles, rectangular inserts, and an outline likely planned with sketches made with a compass on parchment. This is all the more likely, given the high number of detailed and complex patterns condensed into very small spaces. [9] [23]

Panels on the reverse decorated with trumpet spirals and filigree Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 05 (cropped).jpg
Panels on the reverse decorated with trumpet spirals and filigree

The head (or "hoop" or "ring") is made from cast and gilt silver and is decorated on both sides using techniques and patterns influenced by the Iron Age La Tène style. [5] It consists of two large concentric circles, around 28 decorative panels, and a series of rounded studs lining both arms. The head is open on its top half, while the lower half is made of two fused terminals, and is thus solid and closed (i.e. pseudo-penannular), although its design does suggest an opening. [22] [28]

The front of the head is lined with twenty-eight sunken panels soldered onto gold sheets. They are held in place by the then new technique of "jewellers' stitches" (also known as "bead settings" or "milli-graining"), [29] that is intricate and complex filigree patterns formed by minute bands of silver wire. [30] Eighteen panels retain their gilt filigree; the others are either corroded or have been broken off since the brooch was rediscovered in 1850. [4] Other decorative elements include cast depictions of animals (mostly thin-bodied fish) and abstract motifs, separated by glass studs, enamel, and amber. [31] [32] The friezes on the head contain chip-carved roundels (circular discs). Other La Tène elements include the patterns around the center of the head and terminals, which are silver and a dark red at the terminals but lined with gold at the head. [4]

Cartouche at the top of the head (reverse view) Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 03 (cropped).jpg
Cartouche at the top of the head (reverse view)

The reverse is equally decorated, which is unusual given that it would have been hidden against the wearer's garment. Its decorations include rows of chip-carved interlace animals and birds, terminating in trumpet spirals. [4]

Terminals

Glass studs on the terminals of the front side Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 02 (cropped).jpg
Glass studs on the terminals of the front side

The three large and thin panels on the front-side of the terminals are intended to represent the gap in open brooches. They are richly ornamented with filigree and a row of three studs. [33] The reverse is coloured in gold, black and red and contains further La Tène designs including a frieze of four roundels. The hoop and terminals are joined by silver grilled glass studs in red and blue that adopt contemporary Germanic garnet cloisonné techniques, and in part resemble those on the 8th-century Moylough Belt-Shrine and Ardagh Chalice (8 and 9th-centuries). The combination of red and blue glass is unusual for the period. [4]

The reverse contains two trapezoids in the La Tène style, set against a silver and niello background. [34] On each side, the bridge between the head and terminals contains a single large dome shaped stud. [25] The two terminals and their bridge resemble the heads of two beasts biting at either other. [2]

Pin and chain

Glass-eyed serpent on the front of the pin-head Spillone di tara, da bettystown, contea di meath, viii secolo 02 (Pin head).jpg
Glass-eyed serpent on the front of the pin-head

The pin is attached to the upper end of the head by a long oval and gilded panel shaped like a serpent with glass eyes. It is hinged to two ancillary panels with paired animal heads (which may be wolves or dragons) at the ends and two human faces formed from purple glass. [22] [26] [35]

The plaited (interlaced) silver chain is attached to the hook by a swivel. [26] Most likely, it was originally wrapped around pieces of the garment to hold the brooch more securely. Other theories suggest it was used as a safety chain to prevent it from being dropped, or that the brooch was once part of a pair linked together by the chain. [26]

Condition

1881 illustration Tara Brooch Anderson 1881b Fig 12 scotlandinearlyc00anderich 0044.jpg
1881 illustration

When discovered, the brooch was almost fully intact but has sustained substantial losses since. [27] Ten of the front inserts and three studs are now missing, while two more have lost their filigree. Comparison with mid-19th century photographs show that when found, the brooch was missing only a single panel. [36] [37]

The earliest surviving reproductions are two 1852 wood engravings which show it, according to Whitfield, "in near perfect condition" with the majority of the now missing filigree, studs, and inserted interlace designs intact. [38] [n 4]

Discovery

Although named after the Hill of Tara (seat and necropolis of the High Kings of Ireland), the brooch bears no connection to Tara. The brooch was found in c. 1850 on the beach at Bettystown, near Laytown, in County Meath, not far from Drogheda and about 25 kilometers from Tara. [40] The finder, the son of a local peasant woman, is said to have found it in a container buried in the sand, though it is likely that it was found inland, by a river, and she said it was found at the beach to avoid a legal claim by the landowner. [40]

The title was given by an early owner, the Dublin jeweller George Waterhouse, for marketing reasons, to make his reproductions more culturally resonant. [41] At the time, Waterhouse's main source of income was selling replicas of recently found Celtic Revival jewellery, [42] [43] and according to Whitfield was "in the habit of attaching romantic and high-sounding names to brooches of which they sold replicas". [40]

The circumstances of its finding meant that no contemporary archeological survey was made of the find-spot. However, late 20th century excavations of the area by the beach found a large burial site in use from the pre-historic to the Early medieval period. This has led to speculation that the brooch was buried as part of a hoard, but no other objects have been found. Equally, the date and reasons for its burial are unknown; most likely it was placed in the earth to hide it from Viking or Norman invaders, or following a defeat at battle. [5] A 12th century codex, the Book of Leinster, contains a section titled "The siege of Howth" which mentions a precious brooch buried after a defeat, leading some art historians to speculate that a similar fate befell the Tara Brooch. [5]

19th century reception

Celtic Revival jewellery become fashionable in the 1840s. [44] Utilising this trend, Waterhouse later placed the Tara Brooch as the centerpiece of his replica Celtic brooches in his Dublin shop, and exhibited it at the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London, the Great Industrial Exhibition of 1853 in Dublin, and Exposition Universelle of 1855 in Paris. His Tara brooch replicas were smaller by about a third than the original and far simpler in design. [43] Waterhouse chose the brooch's name, deliberately but falsely linking it to the site associated with the High Kings of Ireland, "fully aware that this would feed the Irish middle-class fantasy of being descended from them". [45] He produced several replicas, which were generally smaller and less detailed than the original. [39]

The Dublin exhibition was visited by Queen Victoria who had an interest in the Hill of Tara, liked these Celtic brooches and purchased a number of facsimiles of the brooch, although she did not know that it had actually been found in Bettystown. [43] [46] Prince Albert had already bought two similar pieces for her when the two of them visited Dublin in 1849.

In 1868, the brooch was sold to the Royal Irish Academy. By the 1870s, "Tara brooch" had become a generic term for Celtic Revival brooches, some of which were by then being made by Indian workshops for export to Europe. [47] [48]

Notes

  1. Penannular translates from Latin as "almost (paene) circular (annular)". In these brooches the hoop contains a gap to allow the pin to pass through it for fastening. [2]
  2. At the time, women would have worn brooches more centrally and lower, at the breast. [13]
  3. The Hunterston Brooch is similarly dated to this period based on its stylistic and technical similarities to the Lindisfarne Gospels. [15]
  4. A December 10th 1850 introduction to Petrie's RIA lecture mentions a "number of minute and careful drawings of various scrolls and devices of this most remarkable piece of ancient art", but none survive. [39]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Book of Durrow</span> Medieval illuminated manuscript gospel book

The Book of Durrow is an illuminated manuscript dated to c. 700 that consists of text from the four Gospels gospel books, written in an Irish adaption of Vulgate Latin, and illustrated in the Insular script style.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brooch</span> Large ornament with a pin fastening

A brooch is a decorative jewellery item designed to be attached to garments, often to fasten them together. It is usually made of metal, often silver or gold or some other material. Brooches are frequently decorated with enamel or with gemstones and may be solely for ornament or serve a practical function as a clothes fastener. The earliest known brooches are from the Bronze Age. As fashions in brooches changed rather quickly, they are important chronological indicators. In archaeology, ancient European brooches are usually referred to by the Latin term fibula.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ardagh Hoard</span> Hoard of metalwork in Ireland

The Ardagh Hoard, best known for the Ardagh Chalice, is a hoard of metalwork from the 8th and 9th centuries. Found in 1868 by two young local boys, Jim Quin and Paddy Flanagan, it is now on display in the National Museum of Ireland in Dublin. It consists of the chalice, a much plainer stemmed cup in copper-alloy, and four brooches — three elaborate pseudo-penannular ones, and one a true pennanular brooch of the thistle type; this is the latest object in the hoard, and suggests it may have been deposited around 900 AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Migration Period art</span> C. 300–900 Germanic and Hiberno-Saxon art

Migration Period art denotes the artwork of the Germanic peoples during the Migration period. It includes the Migration art of the Germanic tribes on the continent, as well the start of the Insular art or Hiberno-Saxon art of the Anglo-Saxon and Celtic fusion in Britain and Ireland. It covers many different styles of art including the polychrome style and the animal style. After Christianization, Migration Period art developed into various schools of Early Medieval art in Western Europe which are normally classified by region, such as Anglo-Saxon art and Carolingian art, before the continent-wide styles of Romanesque art and finally Gothic art developed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Celtic brooch</span> Ring-and-pin clothing fastener

The Celtic brooch, more properly called the penannular brooch, and its closely related type, the pseudo-penannular brooch, are types of brooch clothes fasteners, often rather large; penannular means formed as an incomplete ring. They are especially associated with the beginning of the Early Medieval period in Ireland and Britain, although they are found in other times and places—for example, forming part of traditional female dress in areas in modern North Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunterston Brooch</span>

The Hunterston Brooch is a highly important Celtic brooch of "pseudo-penannular" type found near Hunterston, North Ayrshire, Scotland, in either, according to one account, 1826 by two men from West Kilbride, who were digging drains at the foot of Goldenberry Hill, or in 1830. It is now in the National Museum of Scotland, Edinburgh. Made within a few decades of 700 AD, the Hunterston Brooch is cast in silver, gilt, and set with pieces of amber, and decorated with interlaced animal bodies in gold filigree. The diameter of the ring is 12.2 cm, and in its centre there is a cross and a golden glory representing the risen Christ, surrounded by tiny bird heads. The pin, which is broken, can travel freely around the ring as far as the terminals, which was necessary for fastening; it is now 13.1 cm long, but was probably originally 15 cm or more.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Museum of Ireland – Archaeology</span> National museum in Dublin, Ireland

The National Museum of Ireland – Archaeology is a branch of the National Museum of Ireland located on Kildare Street in Dublin, Ireland, that specialises in Irish and other antiquities dating from the Stone Age to the Late Middle Ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Art in Medieval Scotland</span>

In the early Middle Ages, there were distinct material cultures evident in the different federations and kingdoms within what is now Scotland. Pictish art was the only uniquely Scottish medieval style; it can be seen in the extensive survival of carved stones, particularly in the north and east of the country, which hold a variety of recurring images and patterns. It can also be seen in elaborate metal work that largely survives in buried hoards. Irish-Scots art from the kingdom of Dál Riata suggests that it was one of the places, as a crossroads between cultures, where the Insular style developed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Londesborough Brooch</span>

The Londesborough Brooch is a Celtic pseudo-penannular brooch from Ireland. Dating from the late eighth or early ninth century, it is a particularly elaborate example of a dress fastener dated to Ireland's artistic golden age, when objects such as the Tara Brooch and Ardagh Chalice were produced. Since 1888, it has been part of the British Museum's collection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breadalbane Brooch</span>

The Breadalbane Brooch is a silver and gilt Celtic penannular brooch probably made in Ireland, but later altered and then found in Scotland. Probably dating to the 8th century, with 9th-century alterations, it is an intricately designed, silver-gilt dress fastener that is closely related to a select group of brooches that were produced in Ireland and Britain during the 'golden age' of late Celtic art. The brooch has been in the British Museum since 1919 and is normally on display.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roscrea Brooch</span> 9th century Irish brooch

The Roscrea brooch is a 9th-century Celtic brooch of the pseudo-penannular type, found at or near Roscrea, County Tipperary, Ireland, before 1829. It is made from cast silver, and decorated with zoomorphic patterns of open-jawed animals and gilded gold filigree, and is 9.5 cm in height and 8.3 cm wide. The silver is of an unusually high quality for Irish metalwork of the period, indicating that its craftsmen were both trading materials with settled Vikings, who had first, traumatically, invaded the island in the preceding century, and had absorbed elements of the Scandinavian's imagery and metalwork techniques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soiscél Molaisse</span> 11th-century Irish book shrine

The Soiscél Molaisse is an Irish cumdach that originated from an 8th-century wooden core embellished in the 11th and 15th centuries with metal plates decorated in the Insular style. Until the late 18th century, the shrine held a now-lost companion text, presumed to be a small illuminated gospel book associated with Saint Laisrén mac Nad Froích, also known as Molaisse or "Mo Laisse". In the 6th century, Molaisse founded a church on Devenish Island in the southern part of Lough Erne in County Fermanagh, with which the cumdach is associated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clonmacnoise Crozier</span> 11th-century Irish crozier

The Clonmacnoise Crozier is a late-11th-century Insular crozier that would have been used as a ceremonial staff for bishops and mitred abbots. Its origins and medieval provenance are unknown. It was likely discovered in the late 18th or early 19th century in the monastery of Clonmacnoise in County Offaly, Ireland. The crozier has two main parts: a long shaft and a curved crook. Its style reflects elements of Viking art, especially the snake-like animals in figure-of-eight patterns running on the sides of the body of the crook, and the ribbon of dog-like animals in openwork that form the crest at its top. Apart from a shortening to the staff length and the loss of some inserted gems, it is largely intact and is one of the best-preserved surviving pieces of Insular metalwork.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lismore Crozier</span> Irish insular crozier dated to between 1100 and 1113 AD

The Lismore Crozier is an Irish Insular-type crozier dated to between 1100 and 1113 AD. It consists of a wooden tubular staff lined with copper-alloy plates; embellished with silver, gold, niello and glass; and capped by a crook with a decorative openwork crest. The inscriptions on the upper knope record that it was built by "Nechtain the craftsman" and commissioned by Niall mac Meic Aeducain, bishop of Lismore. This makes it the only extant insular crozier to be inscribed, and the only one whose date of origin can be closely approximated. It was rediscovered in 1814, along with the 15th-century Book of Lismore, in a walled-up doorway in Lismore Castle, County Waterford, where it was probably hidden in the late Middle Ages during a period of either religious persecution or raids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kilmainham Brooch</span> Medieval Celtic brooch

The Kilmainham Brooch is a late 8th- or early 9th-century Celtic brooch of the "penannular" type. With a diameter of 9.67 cm, it is a relatively large example, and is made from silver, gold and glass, with filigree and interlace decorations. Like other high-quality brooches of its class, it was probably intended to fasten copes and other vestments rather than for everyday wear, as its precious metal content would have made it a status symbol for its owner; less expensive Viking-style brooches were typically worn in pairs on women's clothing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rogart Brooch</span>

The Rogart Brooch is a large penannular brooch of Pictish origin, dated to the eighth century. Characteristic of contemporary Pictish brooches, it contains three-dimensional bird-head inserts formed with glass.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ballinderry Brooch</span> Irish penannular brooch

The Ballinderry Brooch is an Irish penannular brooch dated to the late 6th or early 7th centuries. It was found in the 1930s, along with a number of similar objects, underneath a timber floor of the late Bronze Age Ballinderry Crannóg No.2, on Ballinderry lake, County Offaly. Made from copper-alloy, tin and enamel, and decorated with millefiori patterns, it is relatively small, with a maximum ring diameter of 8.6 cm, while its pin is 18.3 cm long.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moylough Belt-Shrine</span> Irish reliquary shaped in the form of a belt

The Moylough Belt-Shrine is a highly decorated 8th-century Irish reliquary shaped in the form of a belt. It consists of four hinged bronze segments, each forming cavities that hold strips of plain leather assumed to have once been a girdle belonging to a saint and thus the intended relic. It remains the only known relic container created as a belt-shrine, although such objects are mentioned in some lives of Irish saints, where they are attributed with "remarkable cures", and there are surviving reliquary buckles in continental Europe. The belt may have been influenced by 7th-century Frankish and Burgundian types.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corp Naomh</span> 9th or 10th century Irish bell shrine

The Corp Naomh is an Irish bell shrine made in the 9th or 10th century to enclose a now-lost hand-bell, which probably dated to c. 600 to 900 AD and belonged to an early Irish saint. The shrine was rediscovered sometime before 1682 at Tristernagh Abbey, near Templecross, County Westmeath. The shrine is 23 cm (9.1 in) high and 12 cm (4.7 in) wide. It was heavily refurbished and added to during a second phase of embellishment in the 15th century, and now consists of cast and sheet bronze plates mounted on a wooden core decorated with silver, niello and rock crystal. It is severely damaged with extensive losses and wear across almost all of its parts, and when discovered a block of wood had been substituted for the bell itself. The remaining elements are considered of high historical and artistic value by archaeologists and art historians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shrine of St. Patrick's Bell</span> 12th century Irish bell shrine

The Shrine of St. Patrick's Bell is a bell shrine reliquary completed c. 1094–1105 in County Armagh, Ireland, to contain a c. 500 iron hand-bell traditionally associated with the Irish patron saint Saint Patrick. Inscriptions on the back of the shrine record that it was commissioned after 1091 by the Uí Néill High King Domnall Ua Lochlainn and completed c. 1105 by the metalworker Cú Dúilig, about whom nothing is known. Both objects are historically significant, with the bell being one of the few Irish very-early medieval artifacts with a continuous provenance lasting from around the 8th century to the present, and the shrine is a highpoint of Irish metalwork from the late Insular and early Romanesque periods.

References

  1. Whitfield 2009, p. 236.
  2. 1 2 3 Whitfield 2001, p. 228.
  3. Stevick 1998, p. 15.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Moss 2014, p. 416.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Whitfield 2001, p. 211.
  6. NMI 2022.
  7. 1 2 3 Whitfield 2001, pp. 227–228.
  8. Moss 2014, p. 415.
  9. 1 2 Moss 2014, p. 411.
  10. Whitfield 2001, pp. 229–230.
  11. Moss 2014, pp. 416–417.
  12. 1 2 3 Whitfield 2004, p. 70.
  13. Whitfield 2001, p. 221.
  14. 1 2 Whitfield 2009, p. 235.
  15. 1 2 Ryan 2011, p. 51.
  16. 1 2 Whitfield 2001, p. 216.
  17. 1 2 Ryan 2011, p. 52.
  18. Stokes 1879, p. 452.
  19. Backhouse 1981, p. 66.
  20. O'Toole 2011.
  21. Whitfield 2004, p. 77.
  22. 1 2 3 Edwards 2006, p. 141.
  23. 1 2 3 De Paor 1977, p. 103.
  24. Ryan 2011, p. 48.
  25. 1 2 3 Whitfield 1993, p. 118.
  26. 1 2 3 4 De Paor 1977, p. 137.
  27. 1 2 Moss 2014, p. 217.
  28. Stevick 1998, p. 6.
  29. Whitfield 2009, p. 238.
  30. Moss 2014, p. 112.
  31. Somerville 1993, pp. 70, 71, 74.
  32. Ryan 2011, pp. 52–53.
  33. Whitfield 2001, p. 229.
  34. De Paor 1977, pp. 137–138.
  35. Farley & Hunter 2015, p. 187.
  36. Whitfield 1976, p. 10.
  37. Whitfield 1976, p. 5.
  38. Whitfield 1974, p. 139.
  39. 1 2 Whitfield 1976, p. 13.
  40. 1 2 3 Whitfield 1974, p. 120.
  41. McEvansoney, Philip. (2012) "The purchase of the ‘Tara’ brooch in 1868: Collecting Irish antiquities for Ireland." Journal of the History of Collections. V. 24 (March): Pages 77–88.
  42. Farley & Hunter 2015, p. 244.
  43. 1 2 3 Harrison 2019.
  44. Briggs 2017, pp. 82–83.
  45. Gere & Rudoe 2010, p. 444.
  46. Carew 2017.
  47. Gere & Rudoe 2010, p. 455.
  48. Farley & Hunter 2015, pp. 244–245.

Sources