Time poverty is a term used to describe not having enough discretionary time, as opposed to not having enough money or resources as in economic poverty. Time-poor individuals often face time-related stress, or time pressure, which has negative health effects. Research on time poverty emphasizes its overlooked status in poverty reduction.
Time poverty is often measured as a lack of free or discretionary time due to an imbalance in necessary time (e.g. sleeping, eating), committed time (e.g. domestic labor), and contracted time (e.g. employment). [1]
Estimates for daily committed time varies by study and by individual [2] and are sometimes recorded as "non-free minutes" combining committed and contracted time. [3] Measurements do not always factor poor time management into calculations. [4] Necessary time may also vary due to developmental sleep needs. [5]
Economic inequality can also contribute to inequal committed time measurements as higher income households may hire housekeepers, personal chefs, or au pairs to "buy time." [2]
Spinney and Millward use a Time Poverty Threshold (TPT), similar to an economic poverty line, defined as "150% of median contracted time (i.e. paid labour) plus committed time (i.e. domestic labour)." [6]
People respond more negatively to small losses in money than small losses in time, but the reverse is true for large losses. This could explain time poverty creep. [7]
Time poverty is often referenced in the phrase "money rich, time poor," which describes wealthy people with busy schedules and little leisure time. [8] [9] Some have characterized this as "chosen time poverty," as wealthier people can choose to live near daily activities or hire servants to alleviate time poverty whereas poorer people cannot. [5] As a term, "time poverty" may imply free time is positive; however, volunteer work may present social benefits that "just staying at home" does not provide. [10]
Women are more likely to be time poor than men. The discrepancy may be due to the existence of a "second shift," coined in 1989 by Arlie Hochschild to describe the double burden many women face in performing the majority of housework after returning from work. [11] Time burden from raising children falls disproportionately on women than men. [12]
10-14 year-old girls spend 50% more time doing household chores than their male peers. This imbalance carries into adulthood worldwide. [13]
Infrastructure improvements such as roadbuilding, electrification, and better access to water in the Global South has been shown to lower time constraints on women.
However, conditional cash transfers may worsen time poverty for women as they often take on the role of fulfilling program requirements. [14] One study found that unconditional cash transfers failed to alleviate time poverty because women did not spend the transfers on time-saving services, such as laundry services or take-out. [15]
Time poverty can be caused by poor work-life balance and long working hours. [16] Professional expectations to work overtime can exacerbate time pressure. [7] 32-hour workweeks and preventing after-hour work emails could reduce contracted time. [17] Parental leave, paid vacation hours, [18] and paid sick leave are proposed solutions to work-induced time poverty. [19]
High commute times and traffic also contribute to feelings of time poverty. Low-income workers commute 120 minutes more a week than coworkers who earned more. [7] One study found that transport-related time poverty and general time poverty were not correlated but "co-occur under specific circumstances" among working parents. The study recommended 15-minute cities as one way to potentially reduce transport-related time poverty. [5]
Low-income students are more likely to be time-poor than their peers due to need to work to pay for food and housing. [20]
According to official United Kingdom government statistics, parents living with children under 15 have 14 fewer hours of free time. Parents are also less likely to finish university than childless students. [18] Familial elder care also increases time poverty, as caregivers tend to keep their employment. [21]
A 2013 study found time-poor individuals are at a higher risk for obesity due to a decrease in time spent on physical activity. [22] Another study found 1 in 4 American women delayed health care treatment due to lack of free time. [13]
Lack of discretionary time may lead to fewer social connections and worsen mental health. [12] Time poor workers may suffer from burnout or presenteeism. [16]
Students experiencing time poverty have worse academic outcomes than their peers despite working harder. Time-poor students take fewer credits and have lower levels of university retention. [20]