Timeline of egg fossil research

Last updated

Fossilized Dinosaur eggs displayed at Indroda Dinosaur and Fossil Park. Indroda eggs.JPG
Fossilized Dinosaur eggs displayed at Indroda Dinosaur and Fossil Park.

This timeline of egg fossils research is a chronologically ordered list of important discoveries, controversies of interpretation, taxonomic revisions, and cultural portrayals of egg fossils. Humans have encountered egg fossils for thousands of years. In Stone Age Mongolia, local peoples fashioned fossil dinosaur eggshell into jewelry. In the Americas, fossil eggs may have inspired Navajo creation myths about the human theft of a primordial water monster's egg. Nevertheless, the scientific study of fossil eggs began much later. As reptiles, dinosaurs were presumed to have laid eggs from the 1820s on, when their first scientifically documented remains were being described in England. [1] In 1859, the first scientifically documented dinosaur egg fossils were discovered in southern France by a Catholic priest and amateur naturalist named Father Jean-Jacques Pouech, however he thought they were laid by giant birds.

Contents

The first scientifically recognized dinosaur egg fossils were discovered serendipitously in 1923 by an American Museum of Natural History crew while looking for evidence of early humans in Mongolia. These eggs were mistakenly attributed to the locally abundant herbivore Protoceratops , but are now known to be Oviraptor eggs. Egg discoveries continued to mount all over the world, leading to the development of multiple competing classification schemes. In 1975 Chinese paleontologist Zhao Zi-Kui started a revolution in fossil egg classification by developing a system of "parataxonomy" based on the traditional Linnaean system to classify eggs based on their physical qualities rather than their hypothesized mothers. Zhao's new method of egg classification was hindered from adoption by Western scientists due to language barriers. However, in the early 1990s Russian paleontologist Konstantin Mikhailov brought attention to Zhao's work in the English language scientific literature.

Prescientific

Late Paleolithic to early Neolithic

Precolumbian North America

19th-century paleontology

Hypselosaurus egg. Hypselosaurus egg 2.jpg
Hypselosaurus egg.

1859

1869

20th-century paleontology

Fossilized nest specimen AMNH FR 6508, recovered from Mongolia during the Central Asiatic Expedition of 1923. Oviraptor philoceratops nest AMNH FR 6508.jpg
Fossilized nest specimen AMNH FR 6508, recovered from Mongolia during the Central Asiatic Expedition of 1923.

1913

1919

1922

1923

1939

1946

1957

1964

1966

1969

1970

They also found that the carbon in the eggshell is mostly the heavier Carbon 13 rather than the lighter Carbon 12. This means the dinosaur were primarily feeding on C3 plants which use 3 carbon atoms in their photosynthesis products rather than C4 plants that use four. [23]

Reconstruction of a Maiasaura nest with eggs Maiasaura Nest Model.001 - Natural History Museum of London.JPG
Reconstruction of a Maiasaura nest with eggs

1975

1978

1979

1991

Early to mid-1990s

21st-century paleontology

Pectinatites. Ammonoidea - Pectinatites pectinatus.jpg
Pectinatites .

2009

2019

See also

Footnotes

  1. Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", page 1.
  2. 1 2 3 Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", page 4.
  3. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20140917-on-the-hunt-for-dinosaur-eggs-in-mongolia
  4. Mayor (2005); page 128.
  5. Mayor (2005); page 129.
  6. Mayor (2005); pages 129–130.
  7. 1 2 Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", page 5.
  8. 1 2 Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", page 6.
  9. Carpenter (1999); "Reason 3. Eggshell Too Thin, Eggshell Too Thick", page 253.
  10. Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", pages 6–7.
  11. 1 2 Carpenter (1999); "United States", pages 15–16.
  12. Carpenter (1999); "United States", page 16.
  13. Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", pages 1–2.
  14. Carpenter (1999); "First Discoveries", page 2.
  15. 1 2 3 Carpenter (1999); "Evolution of the Reptile Egg", page 43.
  16. Carpenter (1999); "India", page 27.
  17. Carpenter (1999); "India", page 28.
  18. Carpenter (1999); "Canada", page 19.
  19. 1 2 Etches, Clarke, and Callomon (2009); "Introduction", page 205.
  20. Carpenter (1999); "United States", pages 16–18.
  21. Carpenter (1999); "Tools of the Trade", page 125.
  22. Carpenter (1999); "Tools of the Trade", page 131.
  23. 1 2 3 Carpenter (1999); "Tools of the Trade", page 132.
  24. Carpenter (1999); "Growth of the Modern Classification System", pages 148-149.
  25. Horner (2001); "History of Dinosaur Collecting in Montana", page 56.
  26. Remnick, David J. "Whole Dinosaur Egg Unearthed, 1st in North America". The Washington Post. Retrieved 3 May 2023.
  27. Carpenter (1999); "How to Fossilize an Egg", page 112.
  28. Carpenter (1999); "Growth of the Modern Classification System", page 149.
  29. Etches, Clarke, and Callomon (2009); "Abstract", page 204.
  30. Koen Stein; Edina Prondvai; Timothy Huang; Jean-Marc Baele; P. Martin Sander; Robert Reisz (2019). "Structure and evolutionary implications of the earliest (Sinemurian, Early Jurassic) dinosaur eggs and eggshells". Scientific Reports. 9 (1) 4424. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.4424S. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40604-8. PMC   6418122 . PMID   30872623.
  31. Shu-Kang Zhang; Jun-Fang Xie; Xing-Sheng Jin; Tian-Ming Du; Mei-Yan Huang (2019). "New type of dinosaur eggs from Yiwu, Zhejiang Province, China and a revision of Dongyangoolithus nanmaensis". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. in press. doi:10.19615/j.cnki.1000-3118.190107.
  32. Qing He; Shukang Zhang; Lida Xing; Qin Jiang; Yanfei An; Sen Yang (2019). "A new oogenus of Dendroolithidae from the Late Cretaceous in the Quyuangang area, Henan Province, China" . Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition). 93 (2): 477–478. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.13779. S2CID   135361965.
  33. Noe-Heon Kim; Seung Choi; Seongyeong Kim; Yuong-Nam Lee (2019). "A new faveoloolithid oogenus from the Wido Volcanics (Upper Cretaceous), South Korea and a new insight into the oofamily Faveoloolithidae". Cretaceous Research. 100: 145–163. Bibcode:2019CrRes.100..145K. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2019.04.001. S2CID   146505811.

References