Amniote

Last updated

Amniotes
Temporal range: Late Carboniferous–Present [1]
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
(Possible Mississippian record)
Amniota.jpg
From top to bottom and left to right, examples of amniotes: Edaphosaurus , red fox (two synapsids), king cobra and a white-headed buffalo weaver (two sauropsids).
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Superclass: Tetrapoda
Clade: Reptiliomorpha
Clade: Amniota
Haeckel, 1866
Clades

Amniotes are tetrapod vertebrate animals belonging to the clade Amniota, a large group that comprises the vast majority of living terrestrial and semiaquatic vertebrates. Amniotes evolved from amphibious stem tetrapod ancestors during the Carboniferous period. Those of Amniota are defined as the smallest crown clade containing humans, the Greek tortoise, and the Nile crocodile. [4] [5]

Contents

Amniotes are distinguished from the other living tetrapod clade — the non-amniote lissamphibians (frogs, salamanders, and caecilians) — by the development of three extraembryonic membranes (amnion for embryonic protection, chorion for gas exchange, and allantois for metabolic waste disposal or storage), thicker and keratinized skin, costal respiration (breathing by expanding/constricting the rib cage), the presence of adrenocortical and chromaffin tissues as a discrete pair of glands near their kidneys, more complex kidneys, the presence of an astragalus for better extremity range of motion, the diminished role of skin breathing, and the complete loss of metamorphosis, gills, and lateral lines. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] :600 [10] :552 [11] [10] :694

The presence of an amniotic buffer, of a water-impermeable skin, and of a robust, air-breathing, respiratory system, allow amniotes to live on land as true terrestrial animals. Amniotes have the ability to procreate without water bodies. Because the amnion and the fluid it secretes shields the embryo from environmental fluctuations, amniotes can reproduce on dry land by either laying shelled eggs (reptiles, birds and monotremes) or nurturing fertilized eggs within the mother (marsupial and placental mammals). This distinguishes amniotes from anamniotes (fish and amphibians) that have to spawn in aquatic environments. Most amniotes still require regular access to drinking water for rehydration, like the semiaquatic amphibians do.

They have better homeostasis in drier environments, and more efficient non-aquatic gas exchange to power terrestrial locomotion, which is facilitated by their astragalus.

Basal amniotes resembled small lizards and evolved from semiaquatic reptiliomorphs during the Carboniferous period. [12] After the Carboniferous rainforest collapse, amniotes spread around Earth's land and became the dominant land vertebrates. [12]

They almost immediately diverged into two groups, namely the sauropsids (including all reptiles and birds) and synapsids (including mammals and extinct ancestors like "pelycosaurs" and therapsids). Among the earliest known crown group amniotes, the oldest known sauropsid is Hylonomus and the oldest known synapsid is Asaphestera , both of which are from Nova Scotia during the Bashkirian age of the Late Carboniferous around 318  million years ago. [1] [13]

This basal divergence within Amniota has also been dated by molecular studies at 310–329 Ma, [14] or 312–330 Ma, [15] and by a fossilized birth–death process study at 322–340 Ma. [16]

Etymology

The term amniote comes from the amnion, which derives from Greek ἀμνίον (amnion), which denoted the membrane that surrounds a fetus. The term originally described a bowl in which the blood of sacrificed animals was caught, and derived from ἀμνός (amnos), meaning "lamb". [17]

Description

Anatomy of an amniotic egg. Chicken egg diagram.svg
Anatomy of an amniotic egg.

Zoologists characterize amniotes in part by embryonic development that includes the formation of several extensive membranes, the amnion, chorion, and allantois. Amniotes develop directly into a (typically) terrestrial form with limbs and a thick stratified epithelium (rather than first entering a feeding larval tadpole stage followed by metamorphosis, as amphibians do). In amniotes, the transition from a two-layered periderm to a cornified epithelium is triggered by thyroid hormone during embryonic development, rather than by metamorphosis. [18] The unique embryonic features of amniotes may reflect specializations for eggs to survive drier environments; or the increase in size and yolk content of eggs may have permitted, and coevolved with, direct development of the embryo to a large size.

Adaptation for terrestrial living

Features of amniotes evolved for survival on land include a sturdy but porous leathery or hard eggshell and an allantois that facilitates respiration while providing a reservoir for disposal of wastes. Their kidneys (metanephros) and large intestines are also well-suited to water retention. Most mammals do not lay eggs, but corresponding structures develop inside the placenta.

The ancestors of true amniotes, such as Casineria kiddi , which lived about 340 million years ago, evolved from amphibian reptiliomorphs and resembled small lizards. At the late Devonian mass extinction (360 million years ago), all known tetrapods were essentially aquatic and fish-like. Because the reptiliomorphs were already established 20 million years later when all their fishlike relatives were extinct, it appears they separated from the other tetrapods somewhere during Romer's gap, when the adult tetrapods became fully terrestrial (some forms would later become secondarily aquatic). [19] The modest-sized ancestors of the amniotes laid their eggs in moist places, such as depressions under fallen logs or other suitable places in the Carboniferous swamps and forests; and dry conditions probably do not account for the emergence of the soft shell. [20] Indeed, many modern-day amniotes require moisture to keep their eggs from desiccating. [21] Although some modern amphibians lay eggs on land, all amphibians lack advanced traits like an amnion.

The amniotic egg formed through a series of evolutionary steps. After internal fertilization and the habit of laying eggs in terrestrial environments became a reproduction strategy amongst the amniote ancestors, the next major breakthrough appears to have involved a gradual replacement of the gelatinous coating covering the amphibian egg with a fibrous shell membrane. This allowed the egg to increase both its size and in the rate of gas exchange, permitting a larger, metabolically more active embryo to reach full development before hatching. Further developments, like extraembryonic membranes (amnion, chorion, and allantois) and a calcified shell, were not essential and probably evolved later. [22] It has been suggested that shelled terrestrial eggs without extraembryonic membranes could still not have been more than about 1 cm (0.4-inch) in diameter because of diffusion problems, like the inability to get rid of carbon dioxide if the egg was larger. The combination of small eggs and the absence of a larval stage, where posthatching growth occurs in anamniotic tetrapods before turning into juveniles, would limit the size of the adults. This is supported by the fact that extant squamate species that lay eggs less than 1 cm in diameter have adults whose snout-vent length is less than 10 cm. The only way for the eggs to increase in size would be to develop new internal structures specialized for respiration and for waste products. As this happened, it would also affect how much the juveniles could grow before they reached adulthood. [23]

A similar pattern can be seen in modern amphibians. Frogs that have evolved terrestrial reproduction and direct development have both smaller adults and fewer and larger eggs compared to their relatives that still reproduce in water. [24]

The egg membranes

Fish and amphibian eggs have only one inner membrane, the embryonic membrane. Evolution of the amniote egg required increased exchange of gases and wastes between the embryo and the atmosphere. Structures to permit these traits allowed further adaption that increased the feasible size of amniote eggs and enabled breeding in progressively drier habitats. The increased size of eggs permitted increase in size of offspring and consequently of adults. Further growth for the latter, however, was limited by their position in the terrestrial food-chain, which was restricted to level three and below, with only invertebrates occupying level two. Amniotes would eventually experience adaptive radiations when some species evolved the ability to digest plants and new ecological niches opened up, permitting larger body-size for herbivores, omnivores and predators.[ citation needed ]

Amniote traits

While the early amniotes resembled their amphibian ancestors in many respects, a key difference was the lack of an otic notch at the back margin of the skull roof. In their ancestors, this notch held a spiracle, an unnecessary structure in an animal without an aquatic larval stage. [25] There are three main lines of amniotes, which may be distinguished by the structure of the skull and in particular the number of holes behind each eye. In anapsids, the ancestral condition, there are none; in synapsids (mammals and their extinct relatives) there is one; and in diapsids (including birds, crocodilians, squamates, and tuataras), there are two. Turtles have secondarily lost their fenestrae, and were traditionally classified as anapsids because of this. Molecular testing firmly places them in the diapsid line of descent.

Post-cranial remains of amniotes can be identified from their labyrinthodont ancestors by their having at least two pairs of sacral ribs, a sternum in the pectoral girdle (some amniotes have lost it) and an astragalus bone in the ankle. [26]

Definition and classification

Amniota was first formally described by the embryologist Ernst Haeckel in 1866 on the presence of the amnion, hence the name. A problem with this definition is that the trait (apomorphy) in question does not fossilize, and the status of fossil forms has to be inferred from other traits.

Amniotes
Archaeothyris BW.jpg
Archaeothyris , one of the most basal synapsids, first appears in the fossil records about 306 million years ago. [27]
Europasaurus holgeri Scene 2.jpg
By the Mesozoic, 150 million years ago, sauropsids included the largest animals anywhere. Shown are some late Jurassic dinosaurs, including the early bird Archaeopteryx perched on a tree stump.

Traditional classification

Older classifications of the amniotes traditionally recognised three classes based on major traits and physiology: [28] [29] [30] [31]

This rather orderly scheme is the one most commonly found in popular and basic scientific works. It has come under critique from cladistics, as the class Reptilia is paraphyletic—it has given rise to two other classes not included in Reptilia.

Most species described as microsaurs, formerly grouped in the extinct and prehistoric amphibian group lepospondyls, has been placed in the newer clade Recumbirostra, and shares many anatomical features with amniotes which indicates they were amniotes themselves. [34]

Classification into monophyletic taxa

A different approach is adopted by writers who reject paraphyletic groupings. One such classification, by Michael Benton, is presented in simplified form below. [35]

Phylogenetic classification

With the advent of cladistics, other researchers have attempted to establish new classes, based on phylogeny, but disregarding the physiological and anatomical unity of the groups. Unlike Benton, for example, Jacques Gauthier and colleagues forwarded a definition of Amniota in 1988 as "the most recent common ancestor of extant mammals and reptiles, and all its descendants". [26] As Gauthier makes use of a crown group definition, Amniota has a slightly different content than the biological amniotes as defined by an apomorphy. [36] Though traditionally considered reptiliomorphs, some recent research has recovered diadectomorphs as the sister group to Synapsida within Amniota, based on inner ear anatomy. [37] [38] [39]

Cladogram

The cladogram presented here illustrates the phylogeny (family tree) of amniotes, and follows a simplified version of the relationships found by Laurin & Reisz (1995), [40] with the exception of turtles, which more recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies placed firmly within diapsids. [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] The cladogram covers the group as defined under Gauthier's definition.

Reptiliomorpha

Diadectomorpha Diadectes1DB (flipped).jpg

Amniota

Synapsida (mammals and their extinct relatives) Ruskea rotta.png

Sauropsida

Following studies in 2022 and 2023, [47] [48] with Drepanosauromorpha placed sister to Weigeltisauridae ( Coelurosauravus ) in Avicephala based on Senter (2004): [49]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reptile</span> Group of animals including lepidosaurs, testudines, and archosaurs

Reptiles, as commonly defined, are a group of tetrapods with an ectothermic ('cold-blooded') metabolism and amniotic development. Living reptiles comprise four orders: Testudines (turtles), Crocodilia (crocodilians), Squamata, and Rhynchocephalia. As of May 2023, about 12,000 living species of reptiles are listed in the Reptile Database. The study of the traditional reptile orders, customarily in combination with the study of modern amphibians, is called herpetology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anapsid</span> Subclass of reptiles

An anapsid is an amniote whose skull lacks one or more skull openings near the temples. Traditionally, the Anapsida are considered the most primitive subclass of amniotes, the ancestral stock from which Synapsida and Diapsida evolved, making anapsids paraphyletic. It is, however, doubtful that all anapsids lack temporal fenestra as a primitive trait, and that all the groups traditionally seen as anapsids truly lacked fenestra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tetrapod</span> Superclass of the first four-limbed vertebrates and their descendants

A tetrapod is any four-limbed vertebrate animal of the superclass Tetrapoda. Tetrapods include all extant and extinct amphibians and amniotes, with the latter in turn evolving into two major clades, the sauropsids and synapsids. Hox gene mutations have resulted in some tetrapods becoming limbless or two-limbed. Nevertheless, these limbless groups still qualify as tetrapods through their ancestry, and some retain a pair of vestigial spurs that are remnants of the hindlimbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synapsida</span> Clade of tetrapods

Synapsida is a diverse group of tetrapod vertebrates that includes all mammals and their extinct relatives. It is one of the two major clades of the group Amniota, the other being the more diverse group Sauropsida. Unlike other amniotes, synapsids have a single temporal fenestra, an opening low in the skull roof behind each eye socket, leaving a bony arch beneath each; this accounts for the name "synapsid". The distinctive temporal fenestra developed about 318 million years ago during the Late Carboniferous period, when synapsids and sauropsids diverged, but was subsequently merged with the orbit in early mammals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vertebrate paleontology</span> Scientific study of prehistoric vertebrates

Vertebrate paleontology is the subfield of paleontology that seeks to discover, through the study of fossilized remains, the behavior, reproduction and appearance of extinct vertebrates. It also tries to connect, by using the evolutionary timeline, the animals of the past and their modern-day relatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sauropsida</span> Taxonomic clade

Sauropsida is a clade of amniotes, broadly equivalent to the class Reptilia, though typically used in a broader sense to also include extinct stem-group relatives of modern reptiles and birds. The most popular definition states that Sauropsida is the sibling taxon to Synapsida, the other clade of amniotes which includes mammals as its only modern representatives. Although early synapsids have historically been referred to as "mammal-like reptiles", all synapsids are more closely related to mammals than to any modern reptile. Sauropsids, on the other hand, include all amniotes more closely related to modern reptiles than to mammals. This includes Aves (birds), which are recognized as a subgroup of archosaurian reptiles despite originally being named as a separate class in Linnaean taxonomy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesosaur</span> Extinct family of reptiles

Mesosaurs were a group of small aquatic reptiles that lived during the early Permian period (Cisuralian), roughly 299 to 270 million years ago. Mesosaurs were the first known aquatic reptiles, having apparently returned to an aquatic lifestyle from more terrestrial ancestors. It is uncertain which and how many terrestrial traits these ancestors displayed; recent research cannot establish with confidence if the first amniotes were fully terrestrial, or only amphibious. Most authors consider mesosaurs to have been aquatic, although adult animals may have been amphibious, rather than completely aquatic, as indicated by their moderate skeletal adaptations to a semiaquatic lifestyle. Similarly, their affinities are uncertain; they may have been among the most basal sauropsids or among the most basal parareptiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labyrinthodontia</span> Paraphyletic group of tetrapodomorphs

"Labyrinthodontia" is an informal grouping of extinct predatory amphibians which were major components of ecosystems in the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. Traditionally considered a subclass of the class Amphibia, modern classification systems recognize that labyrinthodonts are not a formal natural group (clade) exclusive of other tetrapods. Instead, they consistute an evolutionary grade, ancestral to living tetrapods such as lissamphibians and amniotes. "Labyrinthodont"-grade vertebrates evolved from lobe-finned fishes in the Devonian, though a formal boundary between fish and amphibian is difficult to define at this point in time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Batrachomorpha</span> Clade of amphibians

The Batrachomorpha are a clade containing extant and extinct amphibians that are more closely related to modern amphibians than they are to mammals and reptiles. According to many analyses they include the extinct Temnospondyli; some show that they include the Lepospondyli instead. The name traditionally indicated a more limited group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lepospondyli</span> Polyphyletic group of tetrapodomorphs

Lepospondyli is a diverse taxon of early tetrapods. With the exception of one late-surviving lepospondyl from the Late Permian of Morocco, lepospondyls lived from the Visean stage of the Early Carboniferous to the Early Permian and were geographically restricted to what is now Europe and North America. Five major groups of lepospondyls are known: Adelospondyli; Aïstopoda; Lysorophia; Microsauria; and Nectridea. Lepospondyls have a diverse range of body forms and include species with newt-like, eel- or snake-like, and lizard-like forms. Various species were aquatic, semiaquatic, or terrestrial. None were large, and they are assumed to have lived in specialized ecological niches not taken by the more numerous temnospondyl amphibians that coexisted with them in the Paleozoic. Lepospondyli was named in 1888 by Karl Alfred von Zittel, who coined the name to include some tetrapods from the Paleozoic that shared some specific characteristics in the notochord and teeth. Lepospondyls have sometimes been considered to be either related or ancestral to modern amphibians or to Amniota. It has been suggested that the grouping is polyphyletic, with aïstopods being primitive stem-tetrapods, while recumbirostran microsaurs are primitive reptiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reptiliomorpha</span> Clade of reptile-like animals

Reptiliomorpha is a clade containing the amniotes and those tetrapods that share a more recent common ancestor with amniotes than with living amphibians (lissamphibians). It was defined by Michel Laurin (2001) and Vallin and Laurin (2004) as the largest clade that includes Homo sapiens, but not Ascaphus truei. Laurin and Reisz (2020) defined Pan-Amniota as the largest total clade containing Homo sapiens, but not Pipa pipa, Caecilia tentaculata, and Siren lacertina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthracosauria</span> Paraphyletic group of tetrapodomorphs

Anthracosauria is an order of extinct reptile-like amphibians that flourished during the Carboniferous and early Permian periods, although precisely which species are included depends on one's definition of the taxon. "Anthracosauria" is sometimes used to refer to all tetrapods more closely related to amniotes such as reptiles, mammals, and birds, than to lissamphibians such as frogs and salamanders. An equivalent term to this definition would be Reptiliomorpha. Anthracosauria has also been used to refer to a smaller group of large, crocodilian-like aquatic tetrapods also known as embolomeres.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diadectomorpha</span> Extinct clade of tetrapods

Diadectomorpha is a clade of large tetrapods that lived in Euramerica during the Carboniferous and Early Permian periods and in Asia during Late Permian (Wuchiapingian), They have typically been classified as advanced reptiliomorphs positioned close to, but outside of the clade Amniota, though some recent research has recovered them as the sister group to the traditional Synapsida within Amniota, based on inner ear anatomy and cladistic analyses. They include both large carnivorous and even larger herbivorous forms, some semi-aquatic and others fully terrestrial. The diadectomorphs seem to have originated during late Mississippian times, although they only became common after the Carboniferous rainforest collapse and flourished during the Late Pennsylvanian and Early Permian periods.

<i>Casineria</i> Species of tetrapodomorph (fossil)

Casineria is an extinct genus of tetrapodomorph which lived about 340–334 million years ago in the Mississippian epoch of the Carboniferous period. Its generic name, Casineria, is a latinization of Cheese Bay, the site near Edinburgh, Scotland, where the holotype fossil was found. When originally described in 1999, it was identified as a transitional fossil noted for its mix of basal (amphibian-like) and advanced (reptile-like) characteristics, putting it at or very near the origin of the amniotes, the group containing all mammals, birds, modern reptiles, and other descendants of their reptile-like common ancestor. However, the sole known fossil is lacking key elements such as a skull, making exact analysis difficult. As a result, the classification of Casineria has been more controversial in analyses conducted since 1999. Other proposed affinities include a placement among the lepospondyls, seymouriamorphs, "gephyrostegids", or as a synonym of Caerorhachis, another controversial tetrapod which may have been an early temnospondyl.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parareptilia</span> Extinct subclass of reptiles (306–201Ma ago)

Parareptilia ("near-reptiles") is an extinct subclass or clade of basal sauropsids/reptiles, typically considered the sister taxon to Eureptilia. Parareptiles first arose near the end of the Carboniferous period and achieved their highest diversity during the Permian period. Several ecological innovations were first accomplished by parareptiles among reptiles. These include the first reptiles to return to marine ecosystems (mesosaurs), the first bipedal reptiles, the first reptiles with advanced hearing systems, and the first large herbivorous reptiles. The only parareptiles to survive into the Triassic period were the procolophonoids, a group of small generalists, omnivores, and herbivores. The largest family of procolophonoids, the procolophonids, rediversified in the Triassic, but subsequently declined and became extinct by the end of the period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temporal fenestra</span> Opening in the skull behind the orbit in some animals

Temporal fenestrae are openings in the temporal region of the skull of some amniotes, behind the orbit. These openings have historically been used to track the evolution and affinities of reptiles. Temporal fenestrae are commonly seen in the fossilized skulls of dinosaurs and other sauropsids. The major reptile group Diapsida, for example, is defined by the presence of two temporal fenestrae on each side of the skull. The infratemporal fenestra, also called the lateral temporal fenestra or lower temporal fenestra, is the lower of the two and is exposed primarily in lateral (side) view.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anamniotes</span> Group of vertebrates consisting of amphibians and fish

The anamniotes are an informal group of craniates comprising all fish and amphibians, which lay their eggs in aquatic environments. They are distinguished from the amniotes, which can reproduce on dry land either by laying shelled eggs or by carrying fertilized eggs within the female. Older sources, particularly before the 20th century, may refer to anamniotes as "lower vertebrates" and amniotes as "higher vertebrates", based on the antiquated idea of the evolutionary great chain of being.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of reptiles</span> Origin and diversification of reptiles through geologic time

Reptiles arose about 320 million years ago during the Carboniferous period. Reptiles, in the traditional sense of the term, are defined as animals that have scales or scutes, lay land-based hard-shelled eggs, and possess ectothermic metabolisms. So defined, the group is paraphyletic, excluding endothermic animals like birds that are descended from early traditionally-defined reptiles. A definition in accordance with phylogenetic nomenclature, which rejects paraphyletic groups, includes birds while excluding mammals and their synapsid ancestors. So defined, Reptilia is identical to Sauropsida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of tetrapods</span> Evolution of four legged vertebrates and their derivatives

The evolution of tetrapods began about 400 million years ago in the Devonian Period with the earliest tetrapods evolved from lobe-finned fishes. Tetrapods are categorized as animals in the biological superclass Tetrapoda, which includes all living and extinct amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. While most species today are terrestrial, little evidence supports the idea that any of the earliest tetrapods could move about on land, as their limbs could not have held their midsections off the ground and the known trackways do not indicate they dragged their bellies around. Presumably, the tracks were made by animals walking along the bottoms of shallow bodies of water. The specific aquatic ancestors of the tetrapods, and the process by which land colonization occurred, remain unclear. They are areas of active research and debate among palaeontologists at present.

Cladistic classification of Sarcopterygii is the classication of Sarcopterygii as a clade containing not only the lobe-finned fishes but also the tetrapods, which are closely related to lungfish. The taxon Sarcopterygii was traditionally classified as a paraphyletic group considered either a class or a subclass of Osteichthyes. Identification of the group is based on several characteristics, such as the presence of fleshy, lobed, paired fins, which are joined to the body by a single bone.

References

  1. 1 2 Marjanović, D. (2021). "The Making of Calibration Sausage Exemplified by Recalibrating the Transcriptomic Timetree of Jawed Vertebrates". Frontiers in Genetics. 12. 521693. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.521693 . PMC   8149952 . PMID   34054911.
  2. Paton, R. L.; Smithson, T. R.; Clack, J. A. (8 April 1999). "An amniote-like skeleton from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland". Nature. 398 (6727): 508–513. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..508P. doi:10.1038/19071. ISSN   0028-0836. S2CID   204992355.
  3. Irmis, R. B.; Parker, W. G. (2005). "Unusual tetrapod teeth from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation, Arizona, USA". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences . 42 (7): 1339–1345. Bibcode:2005CaJES..42.1339I. doi:10.1139/e05-031. S2CID   46418796.
  4. Laurin, Michel; Reisz, Robert R. "Amniota". RegNum. Retrieved 19 July 2024.
  5. Queiroz, Kevin de; Cantino, Philip D.; Gauthier, Jacques A. (30 April 2020). Phylonyms: A Companion to the PhyloCode (1 ed.). CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780429446276. ISBN   978-0-429-44627-6.
  6. Benton, Michael J. (1997). Vertebrate Palaeontology. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 105–109. ISBN   978-0-412-73810-4.
  7. Cieri, R.L., Hatch, S.T., Capano, J.G. et al. (2020). Locomotor rib kinematics in two species of lizards and a new hypothesis for the evolution of aspiration breathing in amniotes. Sci Rep10. 7739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64140-y
  8. Janis, C. M., Napoli, J. G., & Warren, D. E. (2020). Palaeophysiology of pH regulation in tetrapods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375 (1793), 20190131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0131
  9. Hickman, Cleveland P. Jr (17 October 2016). Integrated principles of zoology (Seventeenth ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 563–567. ISBN   978-1-259-56231-0.
  10. 1 2 3 Kardong, Kenneth V. (16 February 2011). Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution. McGraw-Hill. ISBN   978-0-07-352423-8.
  11. Clack, Jennifer A. (27 August 2023). Gaining Ground: The Origin and Evolution of Tetrapods. Indiana University Press. p. 370. ISBN   978-0-253-35675-8.
  12. 1 2 Benton, M.J.; Donoghue, P.C.J. (2006). "Palaeontological evidence to date the tree of life". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 24 (1): 26–53. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl150 . PMID   17047029.
  13. Mann, Arjan; Gee, Bryan M.; Pardo, Jason D.; Marjanović, David; Adams, Gabrielle R.; Calthorpe, Ami S.; Maddin, Hillary C.; Anderson, Jason S. (5 May 2020). Sansom, Robert (ed.). "Reassessment of historic 'microsaurs' from Joggins, Nova Scotia, reveals hidden diversity in the earliest amniote ecosystem". Papers in Palaeontology. 6 (4). Wiley: 605–625. Bibcode:2020PPal....6..605M. doi:10.1002/spp2.1316. ISSN   2056-2802.
  14. Delsuc, Frédéric; Philippe, Hervé; Tsagkogeorga, Georgia; Simion, Paul; Tilak, Marie-Ka; Turon, Xavier; López-Legentil, Susanna; Piette, Jacques; Lemaire, Patrick; Douzery, Emmanuel J. P. (13 April 2018). "A phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicates". BMC Biology. 16 (1): 39. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0499-2 . ISSN   1741-7007. PMC   5899321 . PMID   29653534.
  15. Wang, Zhuo; Pascual-Anaya, Juan; Zadissa, Amonida; Li, Wenqi; Niimura, Yoshihito; Huang, Zhiyong; Li, Chunyi; White, Simon; Xiong, Zhiqiang; Fang, Dongming; Wang, Bo; Ming, Yao; Chen, Yan; Zheng, Yuan; Kuraku, Shigehiro; Pignatelli, Miguel; Herrero, Javier; Beal, Kathryn; Nozawa, Masafumi; Li, Qiye; Wang, Juan; Zhang, Hongyan; Yu, Lili; Shigenobu, Shuji; Wang, Junyi; Liu, Jiannan; Flicek, Paul; Searle, Steve; Wang, Jun; Kuratani, Shigeru; Yin, Ye; Aken, Bronwen; Zhang, Guojie; Irie, Naoki (June 2013). "The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan". Nature Genetics. 45 (6): 701–706. doi:10.1038/ng.2615. ISSN   1546-1718. PMC   4000948 . PMID   23624526.
  16. Didier, Gilles; Laurin, Michel (1 November 2020). "Exact Distribution of Divergence Times from Fossil Ages and Tree Topologies". Systematic Biology. 69 (6): 1068–1087. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa021. PMID   32191326.
  17. Oxford English Dictionary
  18. Alexander M. Schreiber; Donald D. Brown (2003). "Tadpole skin dies autonomously in response to thyroid hormone at metamorphosis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (4): 1769–1774. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.1769S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252774999 . PMC   149908 . PMID   12560472.
  19. "the_mid_palaeozoic_biotic_crisis – Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton – University of Southampton".
  20. Stewart J. R. (1997): Morphology and evolution of the egg of oviparous amniotes. In: S. Sumida and K. Martin (ed.) Amniote Origins-Completing the Transition to Land (1): 291–326. London: Academic Press.
  21. Cunningham, B.; Huene, E. (July–August 1938). "Further Studies on Water Absorption by Reptile Eggs". The American Naturalist. 72 (741): 380–385. doi:10.1086/280791. JSTOR   2457547. S2CID   84258651.
  22. Shell Game » American Scientist
  23. Michel Laurin (2004). "The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of amniotes". Systematic Biology. 53 (4): 594–622. doi:10.1080/10635150490445706. PMID   15371249.
  24. Gomez-Mestre, Ivan; Pyron, Robert Alexander; Wiens, John J. (2012). "Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Unexpected Patterns in the Evolution of Reproductive Modes in Frogs". Evolution. 66 (12): 3687–3700. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01715.x. hdl: 10261/63940 . PMID   23206128.
  25. Lombard, R. E. & Bolt, J. R. (1979): Evolution of the tetrapod ear: an analysis and reinterpretation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society No 11: pp 19–76 Abstract
  26. 1 2 Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G. and Rowe, T. (1988). "The early evolution of the Amniota." Pp. 103–155 in Benton, M.J. (ed.), The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Volume 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  27. Falcon-Lang, H J; Benton, M J; Stimson, M (2007). "Ecology of early reptiles inferred from Lower Pennsylvanian trackways". Journal of the Geological Society . 164 (6): 1113–1118. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.06.020.
  28. Romer A S and Parsons T S (1985) The Vertebrate Body. (6th ed.) Saunders, Philadelphia.
  29. Carroll, R. L. (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, WH Freeman & Co.
  30. Hildebrand, M.; G. E. Goslow Jr (2001). Analysis of vertebrate structure. New York: Wiley. p. 429. ISBN   978-0-471-29505-1.
  31. Colbert, E.H. & Morales, M. (2001): Colbert's Evolution of the Vertebrates: A History of the Backboned Animals Through Time . 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York  ISBN   978-0-471-38461-8.
  32. Reeder, Tod W.; Townsend, Ted M.; Mulcahy, Daniel G.; Noonan, Brice P.; Wood, Perry L.; Sites, Jack W.; Wiens, John J. (2015). "Integrated Analyses Resolve Conflicts over Squamate Reptile Phylogeny and Reveal Unexpected Placements for Fossil Taxa". PLOS ONE. 10 (3): e0118199. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1018199R. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118199 . PMC   4372529 . PMID   25803280.
    • Hope, S. (2002) The Mesozoic record of Neornithes (modern birds). In: Chiappe, L.M. and Witmer, L.M. (eds.): Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs: 339–388. University of California Press, Berkeley. ISBN   0-520-20094-2
  33. Tiny ancient reptile named after Thor's world-ending nemesis
  34. Benton, M.J. (2015). "Appendix: Classification of the Vertebrates". Vertebrate Paleontology (4th ed.). Wiley Blackwell. 433–447. ISBN   978-1-118-40684-7.
  35. Lee, M.S.Y. & Spencer, P.S. (1997): Crown clades, key characters and taxonomic stability: when is an amniote not an amniote? In: Sumida S.S. & Martin K.L.M. (eds.) Amniote Origins: completing the transition to land. Academic Press, pp 61–84. Google books
  36. David S. Berman (2013). "Diadectomorphs, amniotes or not?". New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. 60: 22–35.
  37. Jozef Klembara; Miroslav Hain; Marcello Ruta; David S. Berman; Stephanie E. Pierce; Amy C. Henrici (2019). "Inner ear morphology of diadectomorphs and seymouriamorphs (Tetrapoda) uncovered by high-resolution x-ray microcomputed tomography, and the origin of the amniote crown group" (PDF). Palaeontology. 63: 131–154. doi: 10.1111/pala.12448 .
  38. Klembara, Jozef; Ruta, Marcello; Hain, Miroslav; Berman, David S. (2021). "Braincase and Inner Ear Anatomy of the Late Carboniferous Tetrapod Limnoscelis dynatis (Diadectomorpha) Revealed by High-Resolution X-ray Microcomputed Tomography" (PDF). Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.709766 . ISSN   2296-701X.
  39. Laurin, M.; Reisz, R.R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny" (PDF). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
  40. Rieppel, O.; DeBraga, M. (1996). "Turtles as diapsid reptiles" (PDF). Nature. 384 (6608): 453–5. Bibcode:1996Natur.384..453R. doi:10.1038/384453a0. S2CID   4264378.
  41. Müller, Johannes (2004). "The relationships among diapsid reptiles and the influence of taxon selection". In Arratia, G; Wilson, M.V.H.; Cloutier, R. (eds.). Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. pp. 379–408. ISBN   978-3-89937-052-2.
  42. Tyler R. Lyson; Erik A. Sperling; Alysha M. Heimberg; Jacques A. Gauthier; Benjamin L. King; Kevin J. Peterson (23 February 2012). "MicroRNAs support a turtle + lizard clade". Biology Letters. 8 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0477. PMC   3259949 . PMID   21775315.
  43. Iwabe, N.; Hara, Y.; Kumazawa, Y.; Shibamoto, K.; Saito, Y.; Miyata, T.; Katoh, K. (29 December 2004). "Sister group relationship of turtles to the bird-crocodilian clade revealed by nuclear DNA-coded proteins". Molecular Biology and Evolution . 22 (4): 810–813. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi075 . PMID   15625185.
  44. Roos, Jonas; Aggarwal, Ramesh K.; Janke, Axel (November 2007). "Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses yield new insight into crocodylian evolution and their survival of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution . 45 (2): 663–673. Bibcode:2007MolPE..45..663R. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.018. PMID   17719245.
  45. Katsu, Y.; Braun, E. L.; Guillette, L. J. Jr.; Iguchi, T. (17 March 2010). "From reptilian phylogenomics to reptilian genomes: analyses of c-Jun and DJ-1 proto-oncogenes". Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 127 (2–4): 79–93. doi:10.1159/000297715. PMID   20234127. S2CID   12116018.
  46. Simões, T. R.; Kammerer, C. F.; Caldwell, M. W.; Pierce, S. E. (2022). "Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles". Science Advances. 8 (33): eabq1898. Bibcode:2022SciA....8.1898S. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq1898 . PMC   9390993 . PMID   35984885.
  47. Wolniewicz, Andrzej S; Shen, Yuefeng; Li, Qiang; Sun, Yuanyuan; Qiao, Yu; Chen, Yajie; Hu, Yi-Wei; Liu, Jun (8 August 2023). Ibrahim, Nizar (ed.). "An armoured marine reptile from the Early Triassic of South China and its phylogenetic and evolutionary implications". eLife. 12: e83163. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83163 . ISSN   2050-084X. PMC   10499374 . PMID   37551884.
  48. Senter, Phil (January 2004). "Phylogeny of Drepanosauridae (Reptilia: Diapsida)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2 (3): 257–268. Bibcode:2004JSPal...2..257S. doi:10.1017/S1477201904001427. ISSN   1477-2019. S2CID   83840423.