Pantestudines

Last updated

Pantestudines
Temporal range: Middle Triassic - Holocene, 240–0  Ma
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Possible mid-Permian record [1]
Odontochelys semitestacea 433.jpg
Fossil specimen of Odontochelys semitestacea
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archelosauria
Clade: Pantestudines
Joyce & Parham & Gauthier, 2004
Subgroups

Pantestudines or Pan-Testudines is the group of all reptiles more closely related to turtles than to any other living animal. It includes both modern turtles (crown group turtles, also known as Testudines) and all of their extinct relatives (also known as stem-turtles). [2] Pantestudines with a complete shell are placed in the clade Testudinata.

Classification

The identity of the ancestors and closest relatives of the turtle lineage was a longstanding scientific mystery, though new discoveries and better analyses in the early 21st century began to clarify turtle relationships. They had traditionally been considered relatives of the captorhinids, which also possessed an anapsid skull configuration. Later, the consensus shifted towards Testudinata's placement within Parareptilia, another "anapsid" clade. [3]

Analysis of fossil data has shown that turtles are likely diapsid reptiles, most closely related either to the archosaurs (crocodiles, bird, and relatives) or the lepidosaurs (lizards, tuatara, and relatives). An early proponent of this scenario was Goodrich (1916), who defended a diapsid origin of turtles based on morphological evidence. [4] Genetic analysis strongly favors the hypothesis that turtles are the closest relatives of the archosaurs, though studies using only fossil evidence often continue to recover them as relatives of lepidosaur or as non-diapsids. Studies using only fossils, as well as studies using a combination of fossil and genetic evidence, both suggest that sauropterygians, the group of prehistoric marine reptiles including the plesiosaurs and the often superficially turtle-like placodonts, are themselves stem-turtles. [1] This hypothesis had been previously investigated in the 19th century. [5]

Lee (2001) found that forcing the turtle group to cluster with archosauromorphs resulted in Rhynchosauria becoming Testudinata's sister clade. Forcing a relationship with lepidosaurs resulted in turtles being close relatives of sauropterygians within Lepidosauromorpha. The anapsid hypothesis was still better supported, although an archosauromorph affinity could not be rejected. [6]

Although morphology-based analyses usually do not support a turtle-archosaur clade (Archelosauria), Bhullar & Bever (2009) identified a laterosphenoid bone, typical of Archosauriformes, in the stem-turtle Proganochelys . It may serve as a synapomorphy for this proposed clade. [7]

The cladogram shown below follows the most likely result found by an analysis of turtle relationships using both fossil and genetic evidence by M.S. Lee, in 2013. This study found Eunotosaurus , usually regarded as a turtle relative, to be only very distantly related to turtles in the clade Parareptilia. However, Lee discusses the necessity to investigate the possibility that parareptiles are actually archelosaurs instead of non-saurian sauropsids. [8]

Sauria   (=Ankylopoda)
Lepidosauromorpha

Lepidosauria

  Archosauromorpha  with  Archelosauria  

Choristodera

Trilophosaurus

Rhynchosauria

Archosauriformes

 Pantestudines 

Eosauropterygia

Placodontia

Sinosaurosphargis

Odontochelys

  Testudinata  

Proganochelys

Testudines

The cladogram below follows the most likely result found by another analysis of turtle relationships, this one using only fossil evidence, published by Rainer Schoch and Hans-Dieter Sues in 2015. This study found Eunotosaurus to be an actual early stem-turtle, though other versions of the analysis found weak support for it as a parareptile. [1]

Sauria   (=Archelosauria)
Archosauromorpha

Archosauria

  Lepidosauromorpha  with  Ankylopoda  

Kuehneosauridae

Lepidosauria

Squamata

Rhynchocephalia

 Pantestudines 

Eosauropterygia

Sinosaurosphargis

Placodontia

Eunotosaurus

Pappochelys

Odontochelys

  Testudinata  

Proganochelys

Testudines

Bever et al. (2015) redescribed the skull of Eunotosaurus, identifying a lower temporal fenestra, with a juvenile specimen also having visible upper temporal fenestrae. This instigated a reinterpretation of this taxon as a diapsid instead of an anapsid. Their phylogenetic analyses strongly supported Eunotosaurus's state as a stem-turtle and the placement of Pantestudines in Diapsida, though they couldn't determine a well-defined position within that clade. Sauropterygia and Acerosodontosaurus also end up as possible stem-turtles in some of the trees. [9]

Benton (2015) compiled 2 synapomorphies of Ankylopoda (which would also include Sauropterygia, Thalattosauria and Ichthyosauria close to lepidosaurs): prootic-parietal contact and hooked fifth metatarsal. [10]

Time-calibrated phylogeny recovered by Shaffer et al. (2017) dated the split of Pantestudines from its sister clade (the clade containing archosaurs and all tetrapods more closely related to archosaurs than to any other living animals) to mid-Carboniferous. [11]

Laurin and Piñeiro (2017) placed turtles close to pareiasaurs among parareptiles once more. However, parareptiles were considered derived diapsids in this analysis. The authors interpreted these results as an indication that there might be no conflict between the hypotheses of a parareptilian origin and a diapsid origin. [3] However, this study was criticised in a response paper, which charged that the matrix the paper used was outdated and did not take into account the previous two decades of literature about parareptiles. [12]

The cladogram below follows the analysis of Li et al. (2018). It agrees with the placement of turtles within Diapsida but finds them outside of Sauria (the Lepidosauromorpha + Archosauromorpha clade). [13]

Parareptilia Scutosaurus BW flipped.jpg

Eureptilia

Captorhinidae Labidosaurus.jpg

Paleothyris Paleothyris 02.png

Diapsida

Araeoscelidia Petrolacosaurus BW.jpg

Hovasaurus Hovasaurus BW.jpg

Youngina

crowngroup
Pantestudines

Acerosodontosaurus

Claudiosaurus

Eunotosaurus

Pappochelys Bild2 Ur-Schildkrote Zeichnung.jpg

Eorhynchochelys Eorhynchochelys NT.png

Odontochelys

Testudinata Erpetologie generale, ou, Histoire naturelle complete des reptiles (Centrochelys sulcata).jpg

Sauria
Archosauromorpha

Archosauriformes Deinosuchus riograndensis.png Meyers grosses Konversations-Lexikon - ein Nachschlagewerk des allgemeinen Wissens (1908) (Antwerpener Breiftaube).jpg

Prolacerta Prolacerta broomi.jpg

Trilophosaurus Trilophosaurus buettneri (flipped).jpg

Rhynchosauria Hyperodapedon BW2 white background.jpg

Lepidosauromorpha
Lepidosauria

Rhynchocephalia Hatteria white background.jpg

Squamata British reptiles, amphibians, and fresh-water fishes (1920) (Lacerta agilis).jpg

Kuehneosauridae Icarosaurus white background.jpg

Eosauropterygia Dolichorhynchops BW flipped.jpg

Placodus Placodus BW.jpg

Saurosphargidae

Gardner & Van Franken (2020) criticized the analysis by Li et al., citing problems with the data set and observing that their proposed phylogeny was not supported once the issues were corrected. [14]

Lichtig & Lucas (2021) proposed Pappochelys was related to sauropterygians, Eunotosaurus was a caseid synapsid, and turtles were derived pareiasaur parareptiles close to Anthodon . According to this hypothesis, the turtle shell evolved from a fusion of the ribs to dorsal osteoderms. Odontocheys, which lacked a carapace, is seen as a highly derived taxon instead of a representative of the ancestral state of turtles. [15] The reliability of the molecular support for Archelosauria was also questioned, although Simões et al. (2022) found morphological support for this hypothesis. In their analysis, Pappochelys is the basalmost pantestudine but Eunotosaurus is a basal neodiapsid instead of a stem-turtle, parareptile or synapsid. [16]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anapsid</span> Subclass of reptiles

An anapsid is an amniote whose skull lacks one or more skull openings near the temples. Traditionally, the Anapsida are the most primitive subclass of amniotes, the ancestral stock from which Synapsida and Diapsida evolved, making anapsids paraphyletic. It is however doubtful that all anapsids lack temporal fenestra as a primitive trait, and that all the groups traditionally seen as anapsids truly lacked fenestra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sauria</span> Clade of reptiles

Sauria is the clade containing the most recent common ancestor of Archosauria and Lepidosauria, and all its descendants. Since most molecular phylogenies recover turtles as more closely related to archosaurs than to lepidosaurs as part of Archelosauria, Sauria can be considered the crown group of diapsids, or reptiles in general. Depending on the systematics, Sauria includes all modern reptiles or most of them as well as various extinct groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diapsid</span> Clade of amniote tetrapods with two holes in each side of their skulls

Diapsids are a clade of sauropsids, distinguished from more primitive eureptiles by the presence of two holes, known as temporal fenestrae, in each side of their skulls. The group first appeared about three hundred million years ago during the late Carboniferous period. All diapsids other than the most primitive ones in the clade Araeoscelidia are sometimes placed into the clade Neodiapsida. The diapsids are extremely diverse, and include birds and all modern reptile groups, including turtles, which were historically thought to lie outside the group. Although some diapsids have lost either one hole (lizards), or both holes, or have a heavily restructured skull, they are still classified as diapsids based on their ancestry. At least 17,084 species of diapsid animals are extant: 9,159 birds, and 7,925 snakes, lizards, tuatara, turtles, and crocodiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sauropsida</span> Taxonomic clade

Sauropsida is a clade of amniotes, broadly equivalent to the class Reptilia, though typically used in a broader sense to include both extinct stem-group relatives of modern reptiles, as well as birds. The most popular definition states that Sauropsida is the sibling taxon to Synapsida, the other clade of amniotes which includes mammals as its only modern representatives. Although early synapsids have historically been referred to as "mammal-like reptiles", all synapsids are more closely related to mammals than to any modern reptile. Sauropsids, on the other hand, include all amniotes more closely related to modern reptiles than to mammals. This includes Aves (birds), which are now recognized as a subgroup of archosaurian reptiles despite originally being named as a separate class in Linnaean taxonomy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesosaur</span> Extinct family of reptiles

Mesosaurs were a group of small aquatic reptiles that lived during the early Permian period (Cisuralian), roughly 299 to 270 million years ago. Mesosaurs were the first known aquatic reptiles, having apparently returned to an aquatic lifestyle from more terrestrial ancestors. It is uncertain which and how many terrestrial traits these ancestors displayed; recent research cannot establish with confidence if the first amniotes were fully terrestrial, or only amphibious. Most authors consider mesosaurs to have been aquatic, although adult animals may have been amphibious, rather than completely aquatic, as indicated by their moderate skeletal adaptations to a semiaquatic lifestyle. Similarly, their affinities are uncertain; they may have been among the most basal sauropsids or among the most basal parareptiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sauropterygia</span> Group of Mesozoic aquatic reptiles

Sauropterygia is an extinct taxon of diverse, aquatic reptiles that developed from terrestrial ancestors soon after the end-Permian extinction and flourished during the Triassic before all except for the Plesiosauria became extinct at the end of that period. The plesiosaurs would continue to diversify until the end of the Mesozoic. Sauropterygians are united by a radical adaptation of their pectoral girdle, adapted to support powerful flipper strokes. Some later sauropterygians, such as the pliosaurs, developed a similar mechanism in their pelvis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archosauromorpha</span> Infraclass of reptiles

Archosauromorpha is a clade of diapsid reptiles containing all reptiles more closely related to archosaurs rather than lepidosaurs. Archosauromorphs first appeared during the late Middle Permian or Late Permian, though they became much more common and diverse during the Triassic period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neodiapsida</span> Clade of reptiles

Neodiapsida is a clade, or major branch, of the reptilian family tree, typically defined as including all diapsids apart from some early primitive types known as the araeoscelidians. Modern reptiles and birds belong to the neodiapsid subclade Sauria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pareiasauria</span> Extinct clade of reptiles

Pareiasaurs are an extinct clade of large, herbivorous parareptiles. Members of the group were armoured with osteoderms which covered large areas of the body. They first appeared in southern Pangea during the Middle Permian, before becoming globally distributed during the Late Permian. Pareiasaurs were the largest reptiles of the Permian, reaching sizes equivalent to those of contemporary therapsids. Pareiasaurs became extinct in the Permian–Triassic extinction event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parareptilia</span> Subclass of reptiles

Parareptilia ("near-reptiles") is a subclass or clade of basal sauropsids/reptiles, typically considered the sister taxon to Eureptilia. Parareptiles first arose near the end of the Carboniferous period and achieved their highest diversity during the Permian period. Several ecological innovations were first accomplished by parareptiles among reptiles. These include the first reptiles to return to marine ecosystems (mesosaurs), the first bipedal reptiles, the first reptiles with advanced hearing systems, and the first large herbivorous reptiles. The only parareptiles to survive into the Triassic period were the procolophonoids, a group of small generalists, omnivores, and herbivores. The largest family of procolophonoids, the procolophonids, rediversified in the Triassic, but subsequently declined and became extinct by the end of the period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Procolophonia</span> Extinct suborder of reptiles

Procolophonia is an extinct suborder (clade) of herbivorous reptiles that lived from the Middle Permian till the end of the Triassic period. They were originally included as a suborder of the Cotylosauria but are now considered a clade of Parareptilia. They are closely related to other generally lizard-like Permian reptiles such as the Millerettidae, Bolosauridae, Acleistorhinidae, and Lanthanosuchidae, all of which are included under the Anapsida or "Parareptiles".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Procolophonomorpha</span> Order of reptiles (fossil)

Procolophonomorpha is an order or clade containing most parareptiles. Many papers have applied various definitions to the name, though most of these definitions have since been considered synonymous with modern parareptile clades such as Ankyramorpha and Procolophonia. The current definition of Procolophonomorpha, as defined by Modesto, Scott, & Reisz (2009), is that of as a stem-based group containing Procolophon and all taxa more closely related to it than to Milleretta. It constitutes a diverse assemblage that includes a number of lizard-like forms, as well as more diverse types such as the pareiasaurs. Lee 1995, 1996, 1997 argues that turtles evolved from pareiasaurs, but this view is no longer considered likely. Rieppel and deBraga 1996 and deBraga and Rieppel, 1997 argue that turtles evolved from sauropterygians, and there is both molecular and fossil (Pappochelys) evidence for the origin of turtles among diapsid reptiles.

<i>Acerosodontosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Acerosodontosaurus is an extinct genus of neodiapsid reptiles that lived during the Late Permian of Madagascar. The only species of Acerosodontosaurus, A. piveteaui, is known from a natural mold of a single partial skeleton including a crushed skull and part of the body and limbs. The fossil was discovered in deposits of the Lower Sakamena Formation. Based on skeletal characteristics, it has been suggested that Acerosodontosaurus individuals were at least partially aquatic.

<i>Eunotosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Eunotosaurus is an extinct genus of amniote, possibly a close relative of turtles. Eunotosaurus lived in the late Middle Permian and fossils can be found in the Karoo Supergroup of South Africa. Eunotosaurus resided in the swamps of southern Africa. Its ribs were wide and flat, forming broad plates similar to a primitive turtle shell, and the vertebrae were nearly identical to those of some turtles. Accordingly, it is often considered as a possible transitional fossil between turtles and their prehistoric ancestors. However, it is possible that these turtle-like features evolved independently of the same features in turtles, since other anatomical studies and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Eunotosaurus may instead have been a parareptile, an early-diverging neodiapsid unrelated to turtles, or a synapsid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Testudinata</span> Clade of reptiles

Testudinata is the group of all tetrapods with a true turtle shell. It includes both modern turtles (Testudines) and many of their extinct, shelled relatives (stem-turtles), though excluding Odontochelys and Eorhynchochelys, which are placed in the more inclusive Pantestudines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of reptiles</span> Origin and diversification of reptiles through geologic time

Reptiles arose about 320 million years ago during the Carboniferous period. Reptiles, in the traditional sense of the term, are defined as animals that have scales or scutes, lay land-based hard-shelled eggs, and possess ectothermic metabolisms. So defined, the group is paraphyletic, excluding endothermic animals like birds that are descended from early traditionally-defined reptiles. A definition in accordance with phylogenetic nomenclature, which rejects paraphyletic groups, includes birds while excluding mammals and their synapsid ancestors. So defined, Reptilia is identical to Sauropsida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archelosauria</span> Clade comprising turtles, birds and crocodilians

Archelosauria is a clade grouping turtles and archosaurs and their fossil relatives, to the exclusion of lepidosaurs. The majority of phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data have supported a sister-group relationship between turtles and archosaurs. On the other hand, Archelosauria had not been historically supported by most morphological analyses, which have instead found turtles to either be descendants of parareptiles, early-diverging diapsids outside of Sauria, or close relatives of lepidosaurs within the clade Ankylopoda. Some recent morphological analyses have also found support for Archelosauria.

<i>Pappochelys</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Pappochelys is an extinct genus of diapsid reptile possibly related to turtles. The genus contains only one species, Pappochelys rosinae, from the Middle Triassic of Germany, which was named by paleontologists Rainer Schoch and Hans-Dieter Sues in 2015. The discovery of Pappochelys provides strong support for the placement of turtles within Diapsida, a hypothesis that has long been suggested by molecular data, but never previously by the fossil record. It is morphologically intermediate between the definite stem-turtle Odontochelys from the Late Triassic of China and Eunotosaurus, a reptile from the Middle Permian of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ankylopoda</span> Former group of reptiles

Ankylopoda was a proposed clade that hypothetically contains turtles and lepidosaurs and their fossil relatives. This clade was historically supported based on microRNA analysis as well as some cladistic analyses. However, it was strongly contradicted by molecular evidence which supports Archelosauria, and other recent cladistic analyses have supported Archelosauria over Ankylopoda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perichelydia</span> Clade of reptiles

Perichelydia is a clade within Pantestudines known from the Middle Jurassic to Holocene. Alongside crown group Testudines, it also contains Helochelydridae, which is known from the Cretaceous of Europe and North America, Sichuanchelyidae from the Middle Jurassic to Paleocene of Asia and Europe, Meiolaniformes, which is known from the Cretaceous to Holocene of South America, Australia and Oceania, and Spoochelys, known from the Mid-Cretaceous Griman Creek Formation of Australia. Kallokibotion from the Late Cretaceous of Europe is also considered part of this group. Several other groups, including the proposed clade Angolachelonia, Paracryptodira, Macrobaenidae, Sinemydidae and Xinjiangchelyidae, which are sometimes considered members of Cryptodira, have also been found outside crown Testudines in several analyses. These groups are usually considered to be closer to the crown group than the other members of Perichelydia.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Schoch, Rainer R.; Sues, Hans-Dieter (24 June 2015). "A Middle Triassic stem-turtle and the evolution of the turtle body plan". Nature . 523 (7562): 584–587. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..584S. doi:10.1038/nature14472. PMID   26106865. S2CID   205243837.
  2. Joyce, W. G.; Parham, J. F.; Gauthier, J. A. (2004). "Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles". Journal of Paleontology. 78 (5): 989–1013. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.325.7353 . doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078<0989:dapftc>2.0.co;2. S2CID   15078337.
  3. 1 2 Laurin, Michel; Piñeiro, Graciela H. (2017-11-02). "A Reassessment of the Taxonomic Position of Mesosaurs, and a Surprising Phylogeny of Early Amniotes". Frontiers in Earth Science. 5: 88. Bibcode:2017FrEaS...5...88L. doi: 10.3389/feart.2017.00088 . hdl: 20.500.12008/33548 . ISSN   2296-6463.
  4. Goodrich, Edwin S. (1916). "On the classification of the reptilia". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 89 (615): 261–276. doi:10.1098/rspb.1916.0012. ISSN   0950-1193. S2CID   128565450.
  5. Baur, G. (1887). "On the phylogenetic arrangement of the Sauropsida". Journal of Morphology. 1 (1): 93–104. doi:10.1002/jmor.1050010106. ISSN   0362-2525. S2CID   86222218.
  6. Lee, Michael S.Y. (2001). "Molecules, morphology, and the monophyly of diapsid reptiles". Contributions to Zoology. 70 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1163/18759866-07001001 . ISSN   1383-4517.
  7. Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S.; Bever, Gabe S. (2009). "An Archosaur-Like Laterosphenoid in Early Turtles (Reptilia: Pantestudines)". Breviora. 518 (1): 1–11. doi:10.3099/0006-9698-518.1.1. ISSN   0006-9698. S2CID   42333056 . Retrieved 2022-12-02.
  8. Lee, M. S. Y. (2013). "Turtle origins: Insights from phylogenetic retrofitting and molecular scaffolds". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (12): 2729–2738. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12268 . PMID   24256520. S2CID   2106400.
  9. Bever, G. S.; Lyson, Tyler R.; Field, Daniel J.; Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S. (2015). "Evolutionary origin of the turtle skull". Nature. 525 (7568): 239–242. doi:10.1038/nature14900. ISSN   1476-4687.
  10. Benton, Michael (2015). Vertebrate Paleontology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-118-40755-4.
  11. H. Bradley Shaffer; Evan McCartney-Melstad; Thomas J. Near; Genevieve G. Mount; Phillip Q. Spinks (2017). "Phylogenomic analyses of 539 highly informative loci dates a fully resolved time tree for the major clades of living turtles (Testudines)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 115: 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.07.006. PMID   28711671.
  12. MacDougall, Mark J.; Modesto, Sean P.; Brocklehurst, Neil; Verrière, Antoine; Reisz, Robert R.; Fröbisch, Jörg (2018-07-25). "Commentary: A Reassessment of the Taxonomic Position of Mesosaurs, and a Surprising Phylogeny of Early Amniotes". Frontiers in Earth Science. 6: 99. doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00099 . ISSN   2296-6463.
  13. Li, Chun; Fraser, Nicholas C.; Rieppel, Olivier; Wu, Xiao-Chun (August 2018). "A Triassic stem turtle with an edentulous beak". Nature. 560 (7719): 476–479. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..476L. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0419-1. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   30135526. S2CID   52067286.
  14. Gardner, Nicholas M.; Van Vranken, Nathan E. (2020-04-29). "The Permian diapsid reptiles Acerosodontosaurus and Claudiosaurus are not stem-turtles: Morphological and fossil phylogenetic analyses must take a cautious, holistic approach toward turtle origins". Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science. 92 (1). doi: 10.55632/pwvas.v92i1.626 . ISSN   2473-0386. S2CID   248952833.
  15. Lichtig, Asher; Lucas, Spencer (2021). "Chinlechelys from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico, USA, and the origin of turtles". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi: 10.26879/886 . S2CID   233454789.
  16. Simões, Tiago R.; Kammerer, Christian F.; Caldwell, Michael W.; Pierce, Stephanie E. (2022-08-19). "Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles". Science Advances. 8 (33): eabq1898. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq1898. ISSN   2375-2548. PMC   9390993 . PMID   35984885.