"There is a section for this Purana (Bhavishya Purana) called Kalki Purana, which touched upon Kalki Avatar, (Avatar that comes in the Kali time, or the last time) and what came in this Purana was the reality of Muhammad only, when one of their scholars (Ved Prakash Upaddhay) admitted that there is no Kalki Avatar except Muhammad and he mentioned evidence for that from this book, and claimed that it only applies to it, except that the Hindus differed in accepting this part of the book, and they said that it was plagiarized and it was developed by the later and it was included in the book at a very late time."[83]
Zakaria also criticized the book, saying that Narasangsha is described in verse 127 of the 20th volume of the Atharveda as Kalki which is not the main body of the Atharvaveda, he said that it is an anticipatory portion (Prakshipta Angsha or later interpolation) and subsequent connections, and said that prophecies of Muhammad in Hindu scriptures were used by Hindus to make their scriptures acceptable to Muslims, which is a clever attempt, beginning with Akbar's reign to flatter Emperor Akbar by writing the Allopanishad, he claims that the Bhavishya Purana is completely fabricated and man-made with Hindu references. He says that Hinduism has a habit of adding everything in its religion they got outside in the name of their own religion fabricatedly to attract people to come into their religion, this is also a result of that. In addition, all Hindu scriptures, including the Vedas, are claimed to be adaptations of the beliefs of the migrated JaphethiteAryans (Zoroastrians and Rigvedians), indigenous HemiteDravidians, and other Indo-European classical mythologies along with the influence of monotheism taken from Avestan concept of Ahura Mazda influenced by tha geographically adjacent Arabian Semitic people, as he claimed that, ancient Dravidian Indians were the descendant of Ham, one of the sons of Noah, and the Aryans were the descendants of Japheth, another of the three remained sons of Noah after the Biblical great flood,
This is what historians have mentioned regarding the origin of the people of India, although the truth of the matter is that all are from Adam, and Adam is from dust, and God has destroyed the children of Adam except for Noah's children. The Almighty said: In it, the sons of Noah who remained after the Flood were three: Ham - Shem - Japheth, and the sons of Noah spread all over the world (as-Saaffat 37:75-82, Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya, Ibn Kathir, 1/111-114), and the lands at that time were close, and the seas were far apart, and it is said that Sindh and Al-Hind are the sons of Tawqeer (Bouqir) (Nawfer) bin Yaqtan bin Aber bin Shalekh bin Arfakhshad bin Sam bin Noah. It was said: One of the sons of Ham, Al-Masudi says: (Nuvir bin Lot bin Ham walked his son and those who followed him to the land of Hind and Sindh), and Ibn al-Athir says: (As for Ham, Kush, Misraim, Phut, and Canaan were born... It was said: He traveled to Al-Hind (India) and Sindh and lodged it and its people from his sons and Ibn Khaldun says: As for Ham, from his sons are the Sudan, Hind (India), Sindh, the Copts (Kibt), and Canaan by agreement... As for Kush bin Ham, five of his sons are mentioned in the Torah, and they are sufun, Saba, and Juila and Rama and Safakha and from the sons of Rama Shao, who are the Sindh, and Dadan, who are Hind or India, and in it that Nimrod is from the birth of Kush,..... and that Al-Hind (India), Sindh and Habasha (Abyssinia) are from the children of the Sudan from the birth of Kush. From the foregoing it appears to me: that India entered it at that time from all the races of descendants of Noah, and among the most prominent of them were the sons of Shem bin Noah, peace be upon him, but the sincere Dravids and those who are likely to be the sons of Ham entered it in abundance. As for the entry of the sons of Japheth, it was little, and they are the ones who were known as the Turanians, and by joining the ancient Dravid society and as a result of breeding with them, the born Dravids came as previously explained.[83]
and says that since the Hindu texts do not "truly" contain the original Abrahamic monotheism of God or Allah, it is in neither consistent with the original tenets of Islam, nor these are original divine books, rather the pagan Advaita Vedanta philosophy, which developed the concept of Wahdat al-Wujud or Sufism arose in the name of Islam. And as Hinduism established itself as a conformist and syncretistic doctrine from the Islamic point of view, he claimed that, all Hindu scriptures are not inspired but man-made Aryan literature and the theory that this book attributed Kalki to Muhammad was a false and deceitful attempt.[83]
Other works
Upaddhyay published 15 research and original books.[2][8] Those include:
नरशंस और अंतिम ऋषि (Narasamsa and the last sage)[84]
हिन्दू विधि एवं स्त्रोत (Hindu Law and Sutras), International Law Institute, Allahabad, 1986[85]
हिंदी साहित्य का इतिहास, काव्यशास्त्र एवं लिपि (History of Hindi Literature, Poetry and Script), Vishwavidyalaya Prakashan, Varanasi, 2014)[86]
↑ Ved Prakash Upaddhayaya; Ashit Kumar Bandhopaddhayaya; Muhammad Alamgir (1998). "Muhammad in the Vedas and the Puranas". scholar.google.com. AS Noordeen. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
↑ অভ্রান্ত বৈদিক শাস্ত্রের আলোকে কল্কি অবতার; -2019 (Bangla) Publisher: Shri Charu Chandra Das Brahmachari; Written, compiled and edited by: Pranayakumar Pal and Subhashish Dutta; Publications: Amrited Sandhane (in search of nectar) (Bangladeshi window of Back to Godhead) Publication.
↑ Hinduism & Islam: The Common Thread (Sri Sri Ravi Shankar) (2002) [Kindle edition]. Santa Barbara, CA: Art of Living Foundation USA. 2002. p.20. The Prophet Mohammed and His Appearance in Vedic Literature The Vedic text Bhavishya Purana (Parva 3, Khand 3, Adya 3, texts 5-6) predicts the appearance of Mohammed. Therein it states: "An illiterate teacher will appear, Mohammed is his name, and he will give religion to the people of the desert."
↑ For quotations see: Ramanujan, A. K., "Folk Mythologies and Purāṇas" in: Doniger
↑ For quotation describing the Pratisargaparvan as "practically a new work" see: Hazra, Rajendra Chandra, "The Purāṇas", in: Radhakrishnan (CHI, 1962), volume 2, p. 263.
1 2 B-Gita 8.17Archived 29 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine "And finally in Kal-yuga (the yuga we have now been experiencing over the past 5,000 years) there is an abundance of strife, ignorance, irreligion and vice, true virtue being practically nonexistent, and this yuga lasts 432,000 years. In Kali-yuga vice increases to such a point that at the termination of the yuga the Supreme Lord Himself appears as the Kalki avatara"
↑ Glaesser, Gustav (1969). "Review of Das Bhaviṣyapurāṇa". Münchener Indologische Studien vol. 5 by Adam Hohenberger, Helmut Hoffmann: 511–513. JSTOR29755461.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.