Woods Cree

Last updated
Woods Cree
Nīhithawīwinᓀᐦᐃᖬᐍᐏᐣ
Native to Canada
Region Northern Manitoba, Northern Saskatchewan
Ethnicity53,000 Woodland Cree (1982) [1]
Native speakers
1,800 (2016) [2]
Latin, Canadian Aboriginal syllabics (Cree)
Official status
Official language in
 Northwest Territories [4]
Recognised minority
language in
Language codes
ISO 639-3 cwd
Glottolog wood1236
Linguasphere 62-ADA-ab
Lang Status 80-VU.svg
Woods Cree is classified as Vulnerable by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Woods Cree is an indigenous language spoken in Northern Manitoba, Northern Saskatchewan and Northern Alberta, Canada. It is part of the Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi dialect continuum. [1] [5] The dialect continuum has around 116,000 speakers; [2] the exact population of Woods Cree speakers is unknown, estimated between 2,600 and 35,000.

Contents

Classification

The Woods Cree language belongs to the Algic family, within the Algonquian subfamily, and the central Cree–Montagnais–Naskapi language group. [6] [7] [8]

Western Cree is a term used to refer to the non-palatized Cree dialects, consisting of Northern Plains Cree, Southern Plains Cree, Woods Cree, Rock Cree, Western Swampy Cree, Eastern Swampy Cree, Moose Cree, and Atikamekw. Western Woods Cree is the term used to refer to the Cree languages west of the Hudson Bay. [9] This includes the languages Rock Cree, western Swampy Cree, and Strongwoods or Bois Fort Cree. James G.E. Smith classified the linguistic nature of the languages of Woods Cree, northern Plains Cree, western Swampy Cree, and the extinct dialect of Misinipi or Rock Cree to all fall under the Western Woods Cree languages. [9]

Another name for Woods Cree is Rocky Cree, [10] translated by Rossignol (1939) from the Cree word asiniˑskaˑwiðiniwak. [11] Rock Cree or Misinipi Cree was a "r" dialect of Cree but now have merged with Woods Cree, together as the "th" dialect of Cree spoken by the group of people geographically located at the eastern foot of the Rocky Mountains.

In Alberta, Woods Cree is also known as Bush Cree. [12]

Precise classification of the Woods Cree language has not been sufficiently documented. Many different names and terms have been used in the description of the "th" dialect of Cree spoken in the forested area north of the Canadian prairies. A more general, all-encompassing term for this dialect is "Woodland Cree", which also refers to the cultural group living in the forested area north of the prairies. [13] This term is used, for example, in separating the cultural groups of Cree people who live in the wooded area from the Plains Cree, who traditionally inhabited the prairies to the south.

The language portal of Canada has divided all Cree languages west of Ontario up until the Rocky Mountains into four main subgroups: Plains Cree, Swampy Cree, Moose Cree and Woods Cree. However, in referring to the Woods Cree language they use the terms Woodland and Rock interchangeably. [14] Whether these terms are interchangeable when referring to the Cree "th" dialect however has not been explicitly determined.

History and Geographic Distribution

Different sources in Canadian history texts document the area in which Woods Cree was and still is spoken today. In the early 1900s, J.B. Tyrrell, a Canadian geologist and cartographer and the editor of explorer David Thompson's work [11] found that the people living in the area of Île-à-la-Crosse and upper Churchill River referred to themselves as Nahathaway and spoke the particular -th dialect of Woods Cree. The Hudson's Bay Company had made record of the area west of James Bay being inhabited by people speaking the -th dialect of Cree. [11] This region of Woods Cree speakers has essentially remained the same until present.

Traditionally Woods Cree was often divided into western and eastern Woods Cree, reaching as far east as Quebec. [15] However, the actual Woods Cree language is now determined to be spoken in the mid-northern part of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Western Woods Cree is the category of Cree languages spoken west of the Hudson Bay and in the boreal forested area across the northern provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. [9]

Demographics

In 1982 SIL (Summer Institute for Languages) found that the population of Woods Cree speakers was 35,000 people. More recently the University of Regina has documented that of the approximately 75,000 speakers of Cree across in Canada, 20,000 of them live in Saskatchewan, which is the main area where Woods Cree is spoken. [16] Not only is this finding much less than the 1982 statistic, but this estimation accounts for all types of spoken Cree, not just Woods Cree spoken in Saskatchewan - but note that the Woods Cree spoken outside of Saskatchewan is not accounted for in this statistic. According to the 2016 Canadian Census there were 1,840 individuals who identified Woods Cree as their mother tongue, and 2,665 individuals who said they had some knowledge of Woods Cree. There were also 64,050 people who identified a non-specified dialect of Cree as their mother tongue, and 86,115 who said they had some knowledge of a non-specified dialect of Cree. [2] Some of those individuals could be Woods Cree speakers.

Official Status

Woods Cree is not an official language of any country. Speakers of Woods Cree live in and around the northern, forested area of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. [9] [17]

Phonology

Like other western Cree languages and dialects, Woods Cree only contains seventeen different phonemes. [17] This is a fairly small phonemic inventory for a language; for example, Canadian English distinguishes thirty-eight phonemes. The following phonemes can be found in western Cree languages and dialects: /a, â, c, ê, h, i, î, k, m, n, o, ô, p, s, t, w, y/. Woods Cree differs only in merging /ê/ with /î/ (and thus decreasing the vowel inventory by one down to six distinct vowels) but adding "th" (/ð/) as the reflex of Proto-Algonquian *r (and thus maintaining a distinct phoneme that the other Western dialects have lost). [17] [ clarification needed ]

Consonants

Cree Consonants [18]
Bilabial Alveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Plosive p ⟨p⟩ t ⟨t⟩ t͡s ⟨c⟩ k ⟨k⟩
Nasal m ⟨m⟩ n ⟨n⟩
Fricative s ⟨s⟩
Approximant w ⟨w⟩ ð ⟨th⟩ ( l ⟨l⟩, r ⟨r⟩) j ⟨y⟩ h ⟨h⟩

Vowels

An important aspect of the Cree vowel system is that the Proto Algonquian short /e/ phoneme merged with short /i/ phoneme [18] as shown above. In Woods Cree the long /eː/ also has merged with the long /iː/ phoneme. [19] Phonetically, these two sounds may also alternate. [20] This results in the vowel system of Woods Cree consisting of only three long vowels /iː uː aː/ and three short vowels /i u a/ in the entire language.

Nonpalatalized -th

The distinguishing feature of Woods Cree is the use of the nonpalatalized -th sound in places where other dialects of Cree would use a different sound: for example, Plains Cree is known for using the -y phoneme. This can be demonstrated by the Cree word for 'I'. In Woods Cree the word for 'I' is nitha (IPA: [niða]) whereas in Plains Cree it would be pronounced niya (IPA: [nija], spelled ᓂᔭ [21] in Cree orthography). A significant distinction between Woods Cree and Plains Cree has been questioned in the analysis and history of the language. Various researchers and explorers throughout history however have concluded that there is a "loss of intelligibility between Woods Cree and Plains Cree", [11] distinguishing them as separate languages.

Voiced Dental Fricative patterns (ð)

Cree /ð/ shares features both with obstruents and sonorants. [18] Many languages around the globe have been recorded using the /ð/ phoneme and in most of these cases this phoneme is classified as an obstruent. However, the /ð/ phoneme in spoken Woods Cree has resemblance to a sonorant phoneme. Most of the evidence demonstrated in the article even concludes that it would be more logical to classify this phoneme as a sonorant due to the following five factors: the sonorant realizations of the /ð/ phoneme, the placement of the /ð/ phoneme in the phonological inventory, the voicing patterns of this phoneme in non-word final positions, the usage of /l/ phoneme as a replacement for /ð/ phoneme in caregiver speech, and lastly the /l/ and /ð/ phoneme replacement of /r/ in English loan words. [18] In Proto-Algonquian, the /ð/ phoneme of Woods Cree has been reconstructed as *l and, thus, also demonstrates its relation to being categorized as a sonorant. This analysis is challenged however by particular factors which show the likeness of /ð/ as an obstruent. For example, among younger speakers the /ð/ phoneme is sometimes replaced by a /t/ and voicing in word-final positions also shows that it also falls under obstruent classification. [18] One reason for this particularly unique form of the /ð/ phoneme as explained in the article is a possible phonological shift that is occurring in Woods Cree speech due to the influence of the English phonology on the language, however, the data is inconclusive due to the endangered status of the language. [18]

Morphology

The Woods Cree morphological form follows a similar system to that of other Western Cree dialects (for example, Swampy Cree or Plains Cree). A more comprehensive examination of the Western Cree morphological system relating to Woods Cree can be found on the Swampy Cree Wikipedia page.

Cree languages are polysynthetic and can have single words that would need an entire sentence to properly be expressed in English.

For example:

ni-kî-nohtê-wâpam-âw-ak

1-PST-want-see.TA-3-PL

(note: hyphens here are present solely to demonstrate the separate morphemes)

 

ni-kî-nohtê-wâpam-âw-ak

1-PST-want-see.TA-3-PL

"I wanted to see them." (animate)

Cree is also considered to be a highly inflectional language with all of its inflection being suffixation with the exception of the four personal prefixes.

Third Person Indefinite Possessor

Woods Cree morphology follows the Western Cree system of morphology. Specific to Woods Cree is use of third person indefinite possessors than in other dialects of Cree. The Proto-Algonquian definite possessor prefix is reconstructed as *me- in Bloomfield (1946) [22] Hamp (1976) expands on Bloomfield's analysis by finding in contrast *we- to be the definite human/animal possessor and *me- to be the indefinite possessor prefix. [22]

As found in other dialects of Cree, the following possessor prefixes are used in Woods Cree:

  • ni- referring to first person possession (in English: 'my')
  • yi- referring to second person possession (in English: 'your')
  • o- referring to third person definite possession (in English: 'his/her')
  • mi- referring to third person indefinite possession (in English: 'someone's')

In most dialects of Cree the prefix mi- is used when describing nouns regarding an undetermined body part, clothing items, and members of kin. For example, a pair of pants (noun requiring a possessor), undetermined in whom they belong to would be preceded with the mi- prefix. In Woods Cree the mi- prefix is not applied to members of kin as well as body parts unique to animals. This difference helps demonstrate the dialect difference between Woods Cree and other types of Cree. Plains Cree, for example, does apply indefinite third person possessors when referring to kin. [22]

Future Markers

In Pukatawagan Woods Cree, specific usage of the future markers have been determined. [23] Woods Cree spoken in this area, like other Cree dialects, uses the future markers ka- as the second person future marker. [23] It has been agreed that this is a reduction of the second person prefix ki- and the future marker ka-. [23] The first person future marker na- however does not follow the same reduction patterns (combining ni- first person prefix and ka- future marker). It has determined instead to be a portmanteau realization of first person and tense categories. [23]

Phono-morphological characteristics

In vowel initial verb stems, Woods Cree will use a vowelless variation of the personal prefixes. For example, the verb aðahwi:w 'he buries him' can use the vowelless, reduced version of the personal prefix nika- recognized as n-. The verb then becomes n-aðahwi:w 'I am burying him'. Woods Cree generally uses the connective variant (as seen below) more frequently than the reduced version, however the reduced version is recognized within the language. [23]

Cree verbs that begin with a vowel use the two different connectors -y- and -t- to join the prefix with the verb: [23]

ni-t-apin 'I am sitting down'
ni-y-apin 'I am sitting down

Both forms are equally acceptable. However, in Woods Cree the -y- connective is fully productive and can be used with nouns as well as verbs. [23] This is unlike other dialects of Cree, for example, Plains Cree where the connective -t- is mainly used. In spite of using both connectives, the -t- connective is recognized to be the more common of the two. [23] The use of -y- is also found to be in free variation with the reduced variant of the ki- prefix:

ki-y-ayamihitona:na:w 'we are talking to each other'
k-ayamina:naw 'we are talking'

In the reduced variant (as seen above in k-ayamina:naw) the initial short vowel is not lengthened as in the non-reduced variant (i.e. ki-y-ayamihitona:na:w). [23] This reduction from ni- or ki- to the form n- or k- is unusual in the Cree language to be used in this manner. As found in Plains Cree, only o- initial verbs are allowed the free variation of using the -t- connective. Also the lengthening of the initial vowel is only allowed in o- initial stems, as seen below: [23]

otine:w 'he takes him'
n-o:tina:w 'I take him'

When a verb beginning with a short vowel is used a trend can be seen in Woods Cree that elides the -i- vowel: [23]

aðahwi:w 'he buries him'
n-aðahwi:w 'I am burying him'

However, when determining the context of the situation, the initial vowel of the verb stem can be lengthened to portray the specific context:

n-aðahwi:w 'I am burying him'
n-a:ðahwi:w 'I will bury him'

In Woods Cree, when combining a word ending with a short vowel with a word beginning with a short vowel, the rule of external sandhi requires the final vowel of the first word to be dropped and the initial vowel of the second word to be lengthened: [23]

awa + iskwi:w > aw i:skwi:w 'this woman'

Independent/conjunct order preverbs

The independent order preverbs used in other dialects of Cree (Plains Cree and Swampy Cree) are ta-, kita-, and ka-. [23] In Woods Cree ta- and kita- only occur in the conjunct order. In the independent order of Woods Cree the preverbs na- and nika- are used. The preverb ka- can be used in both the independent and conjunct orders. The preverb na- can be seen as a portmanteau morpheme, which expresses the first person future context. However, in the second person future context there is no kika- that correlates with the ka- morpheme. [23] The independent order nika- is not commonly used in Woods Cree but is found in situations requiring repetition or clarification: [23]

nika-pi:ha:w (after being asked to repeat comment) 'I'm going to wait for him'

The na- morpheme is classified as a portmanteau because it is a dental [n] and therefore it cannot be a reduced form of nika- when here the [n] assimilates with the following [k] ad becomes a velar nasal. [23]

Northern Alberta Cree (not specifically Woods Cree) has also been determined to use the plural suffix -waˑw- where all other Plains Cree speakers make use of the plural suffix -ik-. [24]

Syntax

Cree is a highly inflected language and much of the syntactic expression happens within the noun or the verb itself. [24] Due to the complex morphological characteristics of the Cree language, the syntactic word order is relatively free in comparison to many other languages. Free expression of discontinuous constituents is found in Cree, also referred to as non-configurational. For example, the sentence "the children killed some ducks" could be expressed in the following six ways: [24]

SVO

awaˑsisak

children

nipaheˑwak

killed

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

awaˑsisaknipaheˑwaksiˑsiˑpa

children killed ducks

SOV

awaˑsisak

children

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

nipaheˑwak

killed

awaˑsisaksiˑsiˑpanipaheˑwak

children ducks killed

VSO

nipaheˑwak

killed

awaˑsisak

children

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

nipaheˑwakawaˑsisaksiˑsiˑpa

killed children ducks

VOS

nipaheˑwak

killed

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

awaˑsisak

children

nipaheˑwaksiˑsiˑpaawaˑsisak

killed ducks children

OVS

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

nipaheˑwak

killed

awaˑsisak

children

siˑsiˑpanipaheˑwakawaˑsisak

ducks killed children

OSV

siˑsiˑpa

ducks

awaˑsisak

children

nipaheˑwak

killed

siˑsiˑpaawaˑsisaknipaheˑwak

ducks children killed

Word order is instead used determined by information structure. [25] Moreover, due to the extensive morphology, subject and object noun phrases can be left out completely: [24]

nipaheˑwak ('they killed them' - omitting the subject 'children' and object 'ducks' completely)

Obviation

Cree uses three levels of 'person' categories: first person (the speaker), second person (the addressee), and third (neither speaker nor addressee). However, a characterizing aspect of Cree grammar, is that the third person is divided into third person and third person obviative, used when referring to a person who is not in direct relation to the context, sometimes called the 'fourth person'. [24] These nouns are generally understood as being in the 'background' of the conversation whereas the proximate nouns in the conversation are the nouns that are immediately in question. Obviative nouns are marked with the suffix -a [24] .

Negation

There are two negative markers in Cree: namoˑya or nama and eˑkaˑ or eˑkaˑya. [24] These different negative markers are found in general to coincide with main and subordinate clauses, where namoˑya is used in main clauses and eˑkaˑ is used in subordinate clauses. The eˑkaˑya marker is found to be connected with imperative sentences.

Questions

When asking a yes–no question in Cree, the question marker ciˑ is found at the end of the first word of the clause. [24]

For example:

kikisiwahitin ciˑ? ('Have I made you angry?)

Indirect yes–no questions use a specific conditional marker equivalent to the English word 'if'. In the Plains Cree dialect (lack of Woods Cree documentation) the conditional marker is kiˑspin.

When asking a content question in Cree, the interrogative pronoun is usually found at the start of the sentence. [24]

For example:

taˑniteˑ eˑ-wiˑ-itohteˑyan? ('Where are you going to?)

Indirect content questions will use the same interrogative pronouns.

Pronouns

The two syntactical pronoun forms are interrogative pronouns and demonstrative pronouns.

Interrogative pronouns are also used in Cree to ask direct questions. [26] Commonly used are the following: who = awína, what = kikway, when = tánispihk, where = tániti, and why = táníhki. [26] However, these words change form when describing singular versus plural nouns. For example: singular = awína and kikway versus plural = awíniki and kikwaya. The animacy of the noun also affects the interrogative pronoun creating four different words that are used when asking a question: [26]

AnimateInanimateEnglish
Singular
tániwatániwíwhere is he/she/it?
tánatánimawhich one?
Plural
tániwíyáktániwíháwhere are they?
tánikitánihiwhich one?

Demonstrative pronouns have two separate forms depending on whether the noun animate or inanimate is: [26]

AnimateInanimate
SingularPluralSingularPlural

awa

awa

this

óki

óki

these

óma

óma

this

óhi

óhi

these

ana

ana

that

aniki

aniki

those

anima

anima

that

anihi

anihi

those

níhí

níhí

that in the distance

níki

níki

those in the distance

níma

níma

that in the distance

níhi

níhi

those in the distance

In Cree, it is possible to put two demonstrative pronouns together to be very specific about the location of an object. [26] A third form of demonstrative denotes an (in)animate subject/object that is far in the distance: níhí (singular animate) níki (plural animate) and níma (singular inanimate) níhi (plural inanimate).

Vocabulary

Due to the polysynthetic nature of the Cree language many words in Cree appear to be very long to other less morphologically expressive languages. For example, in Cree the word tîwâpôhkêwin would be translated in English as 'the making of tea'. [27] Cree vocabulary is then extremely expansive. However, the following terms and phrases give a good impression of the Woods Cree dialectal form of making words:

Woods CreeEnglish
tānisiHello
tānisi ikwa kīthaHow are you?
namwāc nānitawI am fine
tawāw pihtokīCome in(side)
tīnikiThank you
tānisi kititahkamikisisnWhat are you doing?
kisāstīwIt is hot (weather)
thōtinIt is windy
kimowanIt is raining
wāsīskwanIt is clear
otāpānāskcar/vehicle
pimithākanplane
ōsiboat (with motor)
piyakone
nīsotwo
nistothree
mithwīthihtamHe/she is happy
pakwātamHe/she is sad
pimohtīwHe/she is walking
nipāwHe/she is sleeping
kīwīwHe/she is going home
ayamiwHe/she is talking
nikamowHe/she is singing
mīcisowHe/she is eating

In the above chart, the bolded letters show the dialect specific th- (/ð/) sound in Woods Cree. In other dialects of Cree this phoneme would be replaced by a different phoneme (such as /y/ in Plains Cree). The letters with a line above them (ō, ā, ī) represent the long vowels, where as the regular letters (o, a, i) represent the short vowel version.

All above listed vocabulary was found at the following website:

http://www.giftoflanguageandculture.ca/flash.htm

This website is designed using digital flash cards to help learn different simple but useful terms and phrases in the 'th' dialect.

Writing System

The writing system and most effective way of writing of Woods Cree is the Cree syllabic system, created by missionary James Evans during the 1830s. The syllabic writing system, however, is slowly being replaced by Roman orthography due to the language being taught in Canadian school systems and especially universities. [28]

The following chart displays the Woods Cree syllabic chart: [19]

Syllable
Vowels
(Nucleus)→		īioōaā
Syllable
Consonants
(Onset)↓		ᐁᐃᐅᐆᐊᐋFinal
Consonants
(Coda)↓
wᐍᐏᐅᐧᐕᐘᐚᐤ
pᐯᐱᐳᐴᐸᐹᑊ
tᑌᑎᑐᑑᑕᑖᐟ
kᑫᑭᑯᑰᑲᑳᐠ
cᒉᒋᒍᒎᒐᒑᐨ
mᒣᒥᒧᒨᒪᒫᒼ
nᓀᓂᓄᓅᓇᓈᐣ
sᓭᓯᓱᓲᓴᓵᐢ
yᔦᔨᔪᔫᔭᔮᕀ
th/ð-ᖧᖨᖪᖫᖬᖭᙾ
↓ Syllable Mediallᓬ
wᐧ [lower-alpha 1] rᕒ
Example:hᐦ
kwīᑵhkᕁ

The basic syllable structure of Woods Cree is (C)(w)V(C)(C) where /h/ will never occur at the beginning or end of syllables and words.

The following examples are of a text called "Encounters with bears" spoken by Mrs. Janet Feitz and transcribed into Woods Cree syllabics as well as the Roman orthography: [29]

Pointed SyllabicsUnpointed SyllabicsRoman Orthography
ᐁᑿ ᐆᒪ ᐯᔭᒁᐤ ᐁ ᑫᓯᑳᐠ ᐁ ᑫ ᓈᑕᖬᐯᔮᐣ, ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑲᐹᐣ, ᐁ ᐅᓭᐦᐊᒁᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ, ᐁᑿ ᑳ ᓂᑕᐏ ᐊᑯᑕᒁᐤ ᐁᑿ ᐊᒁᐚᓂᓯᕁ, ᐁ ᐍ ᐊᔭ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᒁᐤ, ᓇᒣᐢᑎᑿᐠ ᐁ ᐍ ᐅᓭᐦᐊᒁᐤ᙮ ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐱᒪᐦᑲᒥᑭᓯᐣ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ ᐁ ᐅᓭᐦᐊᒁᐤ, ᐁᑿ ᓈᓯᐯᑎᒥᕁ ᒫᑲ ᐏᖬ ᐆᒪ ᑳ ᐃᑕᐦᑲᒥᑭᓯᔮᐣ᙮ ᑫᑕᐦᑕᐍ ᑳ ᐯ ᓈᓯᐯᐸᐦᑖᐟ ᐁᑿ ᐊᐘ ᓂᒉᒥᓯᐢ, ᐁ ᐋᐸᓵᐱᐟ ᒫᓇ ᐃᑌ ᑳ ᐅᐦᒋᐸᐦᑖᐟ, ᐁᑯᑌ ᐁ ᐃᑖᐱᐟ, ᐁ ᓭᑭᓯᐟ, ᐁᑯᑕ ᑭᓯᐚᐠ ᐯ ᐊᐱᐤ ᐃᑕ ᐆᒪ ᑲ ᐅᓭᐦᐃᑭᓄᓭᐍᔮᐣ, ᒣᒋᓱᐏᓈᐦᑎᐠ ᐁ ᐊᔮᐠ ᓀᓯᐯᑎᒥᕁ, ᐁᑯᑕ ᐆᒪ ᑳ ᐅᓭᐦᐊᒁᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ᙮ ᐁᑿ ᐆᒪ ᓂᑯᐢᐱᐣ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐍᒉᐚᐤ, ᒥᑐᓂ ᑯᐢᑖᒋᐤ, ᓇᒹᐨ ᑫᒁᕀ ᓂᐚᐸᐦᑌᐣ ᐊᓂᒪ ᑳ ᑯᐢᑕᕁ, ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ, ᓂᒐᒁᐚᓂᓯᕁ ᓂᑎᑐᐦᑖᐣ, ᓂᑕᑯᑖᐘᐠ ᐁᑿ ᐆᑯ ᓂᑭᓄᓭᒪᐠ ᑳ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᒁᐤ—ᐁ ᑫ ᐴᓇᒫᐣ ᐍᖬ ᒣᓇ ᐱᑕᒫ᙮ ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐯᐦᑐᒁᐣ ᐁᑿ, ᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᓂᓯᕁ ᐁᑯᑌ ᐁᑿ ᒣᓇ ᓂᐱᒪᐦᑲᒥᑭᓯᐣ᙮ ᐋᐢᑲᐤ ᓂᐘᖬᐚᐣ ᐁ ᓂᑕᐏ ᐴᓇᒫᐣ᙮ ᐁᑿ ᐆᒪ ᐁ ᐊᔨᑕᐦᑲᒥᑭᓯᔮᐣ, ᓂᑕᑎ ᐁᑿ ᐋᐱᐦᑖ ᑫᓯᑲᓂ ᒣᒋᓱᐣ, ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑎᑐᐦᑖᐣ ᐃᑕ ᑳ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᒁᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ, ᓂᐴᓇᓯᐣ, ᓇᒨᖬ ᒥᐢᑕᐦᐃ ᓂᐴᓀᐣ, ᐍᖬ ᐆᒪ ᐁ ᐃᑌᖨᐦᑕᒫᐣ ᐁᑿ ᐁ ᐍ ᑲᐏᓯᒧᐚᐣ ᐁᑿ ᐁ ᐍ ᐊᖨᐍᐱᔮᐣ᙮ ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁ ᑫ ᐴᓇᓯᔮᐣ, ᐁᒁᓂ ᓂᐯᐦᑕᑿᐣ ᐁᑿ, ᐁᒁᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑲᐏᓯᒧᐣ ᐁ ᐸ ᐱᒥᓯᓂᔮᐣ ᐁ ᐊᔭᒥᐦᒋᑫᔮᐣ, ᑫᑕᐦᑕᐍ ᐁᑿ ᒫᑲ ᐊᐘ ᓂᒉᒥᓯᐢ, ᓲᐢᒁᐨ ᐁᑿ ᑿᔭᐢᐠ ᒥᑭᓯᒧᐤ, ᑿᔭᐢᐠ ᐁ ᑯᐢᑖᒋᐟ᙮ ᐁᒁᓂ ᓂᑌᑇᑖᐤ ᐁᑿ, “ᐴᓊᐏᑕ”᙮ᐁᑿ ᐅᒪ ᐯᔭᑿᐤ ᐁ ᑫᓯᑲᐠ ᐁ ᑫ ᓇᑕᖬᐯᔭᐣ, ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑲᐸᐣ, ᐁ ᐅᓭᐊᑿᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ, ᐁᑿ ᑲ ᓂᑕᐏ ᐊᑯᑕᑿᐤ ᐁᑿ ᐊᑿᐊᓂᓯᕁ, ᐁ ᐍ ᐊᔭ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᑿᐤ, ᓇᒣᐢᑎᑿᐠ ᐁ ᐍ ᐅᓭᐊᑿᐤ᙮ ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐱᒪᑲᒥᑭᓯᐣ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ ᐁ ᐅᓭᐊᑿᐤ, ᐁᑿ ᓇᓯᐯᑎᒥᕁ ᒪᑲ ᐏᖬ ᐅᒪ ᑲ ᐃᑕᑲᒥᑭᓯᔭᐣ᙮ ᑫᑕᑕᐍ ᑲ ᐯ ᓇᓯᐯᐸᑕᐟ ᐁᑿ ᐊᐘ ᓂᒉᒥᓯᐢ, ᐁ ᐊᐸᓴᐱᐟ ᒪᓇ ᐃᑌ ᑲ ᐅᒋᐸᑕᐟ, ᐁᑯᑌ ᐁ ᐃᑕᐱᐟ, ᐁ ᓭᑭᓯᐟ, ᐁᑯᑕ ᑭᓯᐘᐠ ᐯ ᐊᐱᐤ ᐃᑕ ᐅᒪ ᑲ ᐅᓭᐃᑭᓄᓭᐍᔭᐣ, ᒣᒋᓱᐏᓇᑎᐠ ᐁ ᐊᔭᐠ ᓀᓯᐯᑎᒥᕁ, ᐁᑯᑕ ᐅᒪ ᑲ ᐅᓭᐊᑿᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ᙮ ᐁᑿ ᐅᒪ ᓂᑯᐢᐱᐣ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐍᒉᐘᐤ, ᒥᑐᓂ ᑯᐢᑕᒋᐤ, ᓇᒷᐨ ᑫᑲᕀ ᓂᐘᐸᑌᐣ ᐊᓂᒪ ᑲ ᑯᐢᑕᕁ, ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ, ᓂᒐᑿᐘᓂᓯᕁ ᓂᑎᑐᑕᐣ, ᓂᑕᑯᑕᐘᐠ ᐁᑿ ᐅᑯ ᓂᑭᓄᓭᒪᐠ ᑲ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᑿᐤ—ᐁ ᑫ ᐳᓇᒪᐣ ᐍᖬ ᒣᓇ ᐱᑕᒪ᙮ ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᐯᑐᑿᐣ ᐁᑿ, ᐘᐢᑲᐃᑲᓂᓯᕁ ᐁᑯᑌ ᐁᑿ ᒣᓇ ᓂᐱᒪᑲᒥᑭᓯᐣ᙮ ᐊᐢᑲᐤ ᓂᐘᖬᐘᐣ ᐁ ᓂᑕᐏ ᐳᓇᒪᐣ᙮ ᐁᑿ ᐅᒪ ᐁ ᐊᔨᑕᑲᒥᑭᓯᔭᐣ, ᓂᑕᑎ ᐁᑿ ᐊᐱᑕ ᑫᓯᑲᓂ ᒣᒋᓱᐣ, ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑎᑐᑕᐣ ᐃᑕ ᑲ ᐍᐢᑿᔁᑿᐤ ᑭᓄᓭᐘᐠ, ᓂᐳᓇᓯᐣ, ᓇᒧᖬ ᒥᐢᑕᐃ ᓂᐳᓀᐣ, ᐍᖬ ᐅᒪ ᐁ ᐃᑌᖨᑕᒪᐣ ᐁᑿ ᐁ ᐍ ᑲᐏᓯᒧᐘᐣ ᐁᑿ ᐁ ᐍ ᐊᖨᐍᐱᔭᐣ᙮ ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁ ᑫ ᐳᓇᓯᔭᐣ, ᐁᑿᓂ ᓂᐯᐦᑕᑿᐣ ᐁᑿ, ᐁᑿᓂ ᐁᑿ ᓂᑲᐏᓯᒧᐣ ᐁ ᐸ ᐱᒥᓯᓂᔭᐣ ᐁ ᐊᔭᒥᒋᑫᔭᐣ, ᑫᑕᑕᐍ ᐁᑿ ᒪᑲ ᐊᐘ ᓂᒉᒥᓯᐢ, ᓱᐢᑿᐨ ᐁᑿ ᑿᔭᐢᐠ ᒥᑭᓯᒧᐤ, ᑿᔭᐢᐠ ᐁ ᑯᐢᑕᒋᐟ᙮ ᐁᑿᓂ ᓂᑌᑅᑕᐤ ᐁᑿ, “ᐳᓊᐏᑕ”᙮Īkwa ōma pīyakwāw ī-kīsikāk ī-kī-nātaðapīyān, īkwāni īkwa nikapān, ī-osīhakwāw kinosīwak, īkwa kā-nitawi-akotakwāw īkwa akwāwānisihk, ī-wī-aya-wīskwaswakwāw, nimīstikwak ī-wī-osīhakwāw. Īkwāni īkwa nipimahkamikisin kinosīwak ī-osīhakwāw, īkwa nāsipītimihk māka wiða ōma kā-itahkamikisiyān. Kītahtawī kā-pī-nāsipīpahtāt īkwa awa nicīmisin, ī-āpasāpit māna itī kā-ohcipahtāt, īkotī ī-itāpit, ī-sīpisit, īkota kisiwāk pī-apiw ita ōma ka-osīhikinosīwīyān, mīcisowināhtik ī-ayāk nīsipītimihk, īkota ōma kā-osīhakwāw kinosīwak. Īkwa ōma nikospin īkwa niwīcīwāw, mitoni kostāciw, nimwāc kīkwāy niwāpahtīn anima kā-kostahk, īkwāni īkwa, nacakwāwānisihk nititohtān, nitakotāwak īkwa ōko nikinosīmak kā-wīskwaswakwāw—ī-kē-pōnamān wiða mīna pitamā. Īkwāni īkwa nipīhtokwān īkwa, wāskahikanisihk īkotī īkwa mīna nipimahkamikisin. Āskaw niwaðawān ī-nitawi-pōnamān. Īkwa ōma ī-ayitahkamikisiyān, nitati īkwa āpihtā kīsikani mīcison, īkwāni īkwa nititohtān ita kā-wīskwaswakwāw kinosīwak, nipōnasin, namōða mistahi nipōnīn, wīða ōma ī-itīðihtamān īkwa ī-wī-kawisimowān īkwa ī-wī-aðiwīpiyān. Īkwāni ī-kī-pōnasiyān, īkwāni nipīhtokwān īkwa, īkwāni īkwa nikawisimon ī-pa-pimisiniyān ī-ayamihcikīyān, kītahtawī īkwa māka awa nicīmisin, sōskwāc īkwa kwayask mikisimow, kwayask ī-kostācit. Īkwāni nitīpwātāw īkwa, “pōnwīwita.”

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cree (language)</span> Aboriginal language continuum

Cree is a dialect continuum of Algonquian languages spoken by approximately 86,475 indigenous people across Canada in 2021, from the Northwest Territories to Alberta to Labrador. If considered one language, it is the aboriginal language with the highest number of speakers in Canada. The only region where Cree has any official status is in the Northwest Territories, alongside eight other aboriginal languages. There, Cree is spoken mainly in Fort Smith and Hay River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cheyenne language</span> Algonquian language

The Cheyenne language, is the Native American language spoken by the Cheyenne people, predominantly in present-day Montana and Oklahoma, in the United States. It is part of the Algonquian language family. Like all other Algonquian languages, it has complex agglutinative polysynthetic morphology. This language is considered endangered, at different levels, in both states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western Cree syllabics</span>

Western Cree syllabics are a variant of Canadian Aboriginal syllabics used to write Plains Cree, Woods Cree and the western dialects of Swampy Cree. It is used for all Cree dialects west of approximately the Manitoba–Ontario border in Canada, as opposed to Eastern Cree syllabics. It is also occasionally used by a few Cree speakers in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carrier language</span> Athabaskan language spoken in British Columbia

The Dakelh (ᑕᗸᒡ) or Carrier language is a Northern Athabaskan language. It is named after the Dakelh people, a First Nations people of the Central Interior of British Columbia, Canada, for whom Carrier has been a common English name derived from French explorers naming of the people. Dakelh people speak two related languages. One, Babine-Witsuwit'en is sometimes referred to as Northern Carrier. The other includes what are sometimes referred to as Central Carrier and Southern Carrier.

The Kaqchikel language is an indigenous Mesoamerican language and a member of the Quichean–Mamean branch of the Mayan languages family. It is spoken by the indigenous Kaqchikel people in central Guatemala. It is closely related to the Kʼicheʼ (Quiché) and Tzʼutujil languages.

Swampy Cree is a variety of the Algonquian language, Cree. It is spoken in a series of Swampy Cree communities in northern Manitoba, central northeast of Saskatchewan along the Saskatchewan River and along the Hudson Bay coast and adjacent inland areas to the south and west, and Ontario along the coast of Hudson Bay and James Bay. Within the group of dialects called "West Cree", it is referred to as an "n-dialect", as the variable phoneme common to all Cree dialects appears as "n" in this dialect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plains Cree language</span> Algonquian language spoken in North America

Plains Cree is a dialect of the Algonquian language, Cree, which is the most populous Canadian indigenous language. Plains Cree is considered a dialect of the Cree-Montagnais language or a dialect of the Cree language that is distinct from the Montagnais language. Plains Cree is one of five main dialects of Cree in this second sense, along with Woods Cree, Swampy Cree, Moose Cree, and Atikamekw. Although no single dialect of Cree is favored over another, Plains Cree is the one that is the most widely used. Out of the 116,500 speakers of the Cree language, the Plains Cree dialect is spoken by about 34,000 people primarily in Saskatchewan and Alberta but also in Manitoba and Montana.

Potawatomi is a Central Algonquian language. It was historically spoken by the Pottawatomi people who lived around the Great Lakes in what are now Michigan and Wisconsin in the United States, and in southern Ontario in Canada. Federally recognized tribes in Michigan and Oklahoma are working to revive the language.

Proto-Algonquian is the proto-language from which the various Algonquian languages are descended. It is generally estimated to have been spoken around 2,500 to 3,000 years ago, but there is less agreement on where it was spoken. The Algonquian family, which is a branch of the larger Algic language family, is usually divided into three subgroups: Eastern Algonquian, which is a genetic subgroup, and Central Algonquian and Plains Algonquian, both of which are areal groupings. In the historical linguistics of North America, Proto-Algonquian is one of the best studied, most thoroughly reconstructed proto-languages. It is descended from Proto-Algic.

The Ojibwe language is an Algonquian American Indian language spoken throughout the Great Lakes region and westward onto the northern plains. It is one of the largest American Indian languages north of Mexico in terms of number of speakers, and exhibits a large number of divergent dialects. For the most part, this article describes the Minnesota variety of the Southwestern dialect. The orthography used is the Fiero Double-Vowel System.

The Wuvulu-Aua language is a language spoken on the Wuvulu and Aua Islands, and across the Manus Province of Papua New Guinea.

Lau, also known as Mala, is an Oceanic language spoken on northeast Malaita, in the Solomon Islands. In 1999, Lau had about 16,937 first-language speakers, with many second-language speakers through Malaitan communities in the Solomon Islands, especially in Honiara.

Arbore is an Afro-Asiatic language spoken by the Arbore people in southern Ethiopia in a few settlements of Hamer woreda near Lake Chew Bahir.

East Cree, also known as James Bay (Eastern) Cree, and East Main Cree, is a group of Cree dialects spoken in Quebec, Canada on the east coast of lower Hudson Bay and James Bay, and inland southeastward from James Bay. Cree is one of the most spoken non-official aboriginal languages of Canada. Four dialects have been tentatively identified including the Southern Inland dialect (Iyiniw-Ayamiwin) spoken in Mistissini, Oujé-Bougoumou, Waswanipi, and Nemaska; the Southern Coastal dialect (Iyiyiw-Ayamiwin) spoken in Nemaska, Waskaganish, and Eastmain; the Northern Coastal Dialects (Iyiyiw-Ayimiwin), one spoken in Wemindji and Chisasibi and the other spoken in Whapmagoostui. The dialects are mutually intelligible, though difficulty arises as the distance between communities increases.

Western Ojibwa is a dialect of the Ojibwe language, a member of the Algonquian language family. It is spoken by the Saulteaux, a subnation of the Ojibwe people, in southern Manitoba and southern Saskatchewan, Canada, west of Lake Winnipeg. Saulteaux is generally used by its speakers, and Nakawēmowin is the general term in the language itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maliseet-Passamaquoddy language</span> Algonquian language

Maliseet-Passamaquoddy is an endangered Algonquian language spoken by the Maliseet and Passamaquoddy peoples along both sides of the border between Maine in the United States and New Brunswick, Canada. The language consists of two major dialects: Maliseet, which is mainly spoken in the Saint John River Valley in New Brunswick; and Passamaquoddy, spoken mostly in the St. Croix River Valley of eastern Maine. However, the two dialects differ only slightly, mainly in their phonology. The indigenous people widely spoke Maliseet-Passamaquoddy in these areas until around the post-World War II era when changes in the education system and increased marriage outside of the speech community caused a large decrease in the number of children who learned or regularly used the language. As a result, in both Canada and the U.S. today, there are only 600 speakers of both dialects, and most speakers are older adults. Although the majority of younger people cannot speak the language, there is growing interest in teaching the language in community classes and in some schools.

Mehek is a Tama language spoken by about 6300 people in a somewhat mountainous area along the southern base of the Torricelli Mountains in northwestern Papua New Guinea. Mehek is spoken in six villages of Sandaun Province: Nuku, Yiminum, Mansuku, Yifkindu, Wilwil, and Kafle. Mehek is most closely related to Pahi, with 51% lexical similarity, and spoken approximately 20 kilometers to the southwest. Mehek is a fairly typical Papuan language, being verb-final, having a relatively simple phonology, and agglutinative morphology. There is very little published information about Mehek. The literacy rate in Tok Pisin, spoken by nearly everyone, is 50-75%. Mehek is not written, so there is no literacy in Mehek. Tok Pisin is primarily used in the schools, with 50% children attending. There is also a sign language used by the large number of deaf people in the Mehek community.

Maia is a Papuan language spoken in the Madang Province of Papua New Guinea, and is a member of the Trans-New Guinea language family. It has a language endangerment status of 6a, which means that it is a vigorous and sustainable language spoken by all generations. According to a 2000 census, there are approximately 4,500 living speakers of the language, who are split between twenty-two villages in the Almani district of the Bogia sub-district.

Qaqet, or Baining, is a non-Austronesian language from the Baining family spoken in East New Britain Province on the island of New Britain, Papua New Guinea.

Mortlockese, also known as Mortlock or Nomoi, is a language that belongs to the Chuukic group of Micronesian languages in the Federated States of Micronesia spoken primarily in the Mortlock Islands. It is nearly intelligible with Satawalese, with an 18 percent intelligibility and an 82 percent lexical similarity, and Puluwatese, with a 75 percent intelligibility and an 83 percent lexical similarity. The language today has become mutually intelligible with Chuukese, though marked with a distinct Mortlockese accent. Linguistic patterns show that Mortlockese is converging with Chuukese since Mortlockese now has an 80 to 85 percent lexical similarity.

References

  1. 1 2 Woods Cree at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. 1 2 3 "Census Profile, 2016 Census". Statistics Canada. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
  3. ↑ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian (2022-05-24). "Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi". Glottolog . Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Archived from the original on 2022-10-15. Retrieved 2022-10-29.
  4. ↑ Official Languages of the Northwest Territories Archived December 6, 2013, at the Wayback Machine (map)
  5. ↑ "Cree". www.languagegeek.com. Retrieved 2015-11-26.
  6. ↑ "Algic" . Retrieved 2015-09-30.
  7. ↑ "E-MELD School of Best Practice: Potawatomi Family Tree". emeld.org. 2006-08-04. Retrieved 2015-09-30.
  8. ↑ Mithun, Marianne (2001-06-07). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521298759.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Sturtevant, William C. (1978). Handbook of North American Indians: Subarctic . Government Printing Office. p.  256. ISBN   9780160045783.
  10. ↑ "Saskatchewan Indian Cultural Centre". www.sicc.sk.ca. Retrieved 2015-09-30.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Smith, James G. E. (1987-08-01). "The Western Woods Cree: Anthropological Myth and Historical Reality". American Ethnologist. 14 (3): 434–448. doi:10.1525/ae.1987.14.3.02a00020. ISSN   1548-1425. JSTOR   644951.
  12. ↑ "Edward S. Curtis's The North American Indian - volume 18 page 55". curtis.library.northwestern.edu. Retrieved 2015-10-08.
  13. ↑ "Facts for Kids: Cree Indians (Crees)". www.bigorrin.org. Retrieved 2015-11-26.
  14. ↑ Bureau, Government of Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada - Translation. "Cree language facts for editors of English and French – Articles – From Our Contributors – Language Portal of Canada". www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca. Retrieved 2015-11-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ↑ Sutton, Mark Q. (2015-08-26). Introduction to Native North America By Mark Sutton. ISBN   9781317347217 . Retrieved 2015-10-08.
  16. ↑ "The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan | Details". esask.uregina.ca. Retrieved 2015-10-08.
  17. 1 2 3 Saskatchewan, Cory Toth - Encyclopedia Of. "The Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan | Details". esask.uregina.ca. Retrieved 2015-10-06.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Starks, Donna; Ballard, Elaine (2005-01-01). "Woods Cree /ð/: An Unusual Type of Sonorant". International Journal of American Linguistics. 71 (1): 102–115. doi:10.1086/430580. JSTOR   10.1086/430580. S2CID   143846492.
  19. 1 2 "Online Cree Dictionary, Cree Language Resource Project, Maskwacis Plains Cree, Saskatchewan Cree, Woods Cree". www.creedictionary.com. Retrieved 2015-10-16.
  20. ↑ Starks, Donna Joy (1992). Aspects of Woods Cree syntax. Ann Arbor: UMI.
  21. ↑ "Search results". www.creedictionary.com. Retrieved 2015-10-05.
  22. 1 2 3 Brightman, Robert A. (1985). "The Indefinite Possessor Prefix in Woods Cree". International Journal of American Linguistics. 51 (4): 353–356. doi:10.1086/465890. JSTOR   1265261. S2CID   145445275.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Greensmith, Jennifer, M. (1985). "Future Markers in Woods Cree". Papers of the Sixteenth Algonquian Conference.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Sketch of Cree, an Algonquian Language, In: Handbook of North American Indians, Vol 17: Language". search.language-archives.org. Retrieved 2015-10-30.
  25. ↑ Starks, Donna (1993). "The effect of information status on word order: Evidence from Woods Cree". Linguistica Atlantica. 15: 165–173. Retrieved 26 March 2022.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 "Our Languages ~ Swampy Cree ~ Basic Morphology and Syntax". www.sicc.sk.ca. Retrieved 2015-10-20.
  27. ↑ "Online Cree Dictionary, Cree Language, Cree: Words, Alberta Elders' Dictionary, Maskwacis". www.creedictionary.com. Retrieved 2015-11-12.
  28. ↑ "Cree, Woods" . Retrieved 2015-10-05.
  29. ↑ "ᓀᐦᐃᖬᐍᐏᐣ Woods Cree Text". www.languagegeek.com. Retrieved 2015-11-10.

Notes

  1. ↑ Unicode contains precomposed characters for all syllabics with a medial /w/, for example ᑵ (kwī) is a single code point: U+1475 CANADIAN SYLLABICS WEST-CREE KWE), however the Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics block separately encodes a middle dot glyph for syllabics, U+1427 CANADIAN SYLLABICS FINAL MIDDLE DOT. Although this glyph can be used to represent the middle-dot standalone, its name containing the word "FINAL" (syllabic coda) as well as its general category of Lo, or Letter, other makes it unsuitable to encode the medial-w as diacritical mark.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.