A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq

Last updated
The cover of the Responsible Plan document ResponsiblePlan.png
The cover of the Responsible Plan document

A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq is a 36-page plan that was created by a group of United States Democratic congressional candidates, retired military officers and national security professionals that outlined policy measures (consisting of bills that were before the United States Congress at the time of its writing) that the candidates pledged to support in the 2008 elections.

Contents

The plan's stated proposals with respect to Iraq were: drawing down U.S. military involvement in Iraq, development of a permanent nation-building capability in the Department of State, a large infusion of foreign aid into Iraq, a transfer of responsibility to the international community through dialogue, addressing refugee issues, creation of an independent war crimes commission, and funding of education to improve the status of women.

With respect to American domestic politics, the proposals were to ban Presidential signing statements, require treatment in accordance with the Geneva Conventions and habeas corpus rights for all prisoners, allow potential surveillance targets to sue the government pre-emptively for injunctive relief, prohibit rendition, increase benefits for veterans, reduce defense contracting, and address energy issues. [1]

Background

On March 20, 2003, the United States invaded Iraq leading a multinational coalition that included British troops as well as smaller contingents from Australia, Denmark, Poland, and other nations. [2]

Since the beginning of the war there had been great debate about how it should end. The plan cited a number of facts and events as the foundation for its existence, including the following:

Germination

On August 27, 2007, President Bush made a fundraising visit to Bellevue, Washington in support of Washington's 8th congressional district Republican Representative Dave Reichert. [9] In response, Reichert's main opponent, Democratic candidate Darcy Burner, organized a "virtual town hall" meeting to discuss the situation in Iraq. [10] The town hall meeting was streamed live online and included testimonials from Ambassador Joe Wilson and retired Major General Paul Eaton, former Security Transition Commanding General in Iraq, and the participation of Jon Soltz, chairman of VoteVets.org, and retired Navy Captain Larry Seaquist, among others. [11] In a statement following the event, Darcy Burner wrote:

On Monday morning before the town hall, I asked retired Major General Paul Eaton, who was in charge of rebuilding the Iraqi Army and security forces in Iraq from 2003-2004, if he would chair a group to create a responsible exit plan for Iraq, and he agreed.

Let me repeat: we will be creating a plan to end the war and bring our troops home. It's long past time. [11]

Unveiling

On March 17, 2008 at the Take Back America conference [12] in Washington, D.C., Darcy Burner (WA-08) was joined by five other congressional candidates Donna Edwards ( MD-04 ), Chellie Pingree ( ME-01 ), Tom Perriello ( VA-05 ), Sam Bennett ( PA-15 ) and Jared Polis ( CO-02 ) for the unveiling [13] of A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq, a 36-page document that was the culmination of the six-month effort. [14]

Endorsers

In addition to the six candidates at the March 2008 unveiling and Eaton, [15] the plan was also initially endorsed by candidates Eric Massa ( NY-29 ), George Fearing ( WA-04 ), Larry Byrnes ( FL-14 ), and Steve Harrison ( NY-13 ), as well as Dr. Lawrence Korb, former Assistant Secretary of Defense in the Reagan Administration, Capt. Larry Seaquist, former commander of the USS Iowa and former Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy Planning, and Brigadier General John Johns, specialist in counterinsurgency and nation-building. [16] Two days after the initial unveiling, Rand Beers, a counterterrorism expert who served on the National Security Council under Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton added his endorsement. [17] Within one week, the plan had received the endorsement of an additional 24 Democratic challengers, and as of July 2008 it had 58 House and Senate candidate endorsements, and over 50,000 individual endorsers. [18]

Contents

Outline

The two main strategic questions the plan sought to answer were:

The plan attempted to present a combined military, diplomatic, and economic strategy to end the war in Iraq. It cited various ISG recommendations and listed a number of existing, but stalled bills in Congress that addressed multiple areas of focus.

Objectives

The plan broke down the areas of focus into several categories:

Iraq Study Group recommendations

In support of the stated objectives, the plan referenced seven recommendations from the final report of the Iraq Study Group.

RECOMMENDATION 1: The United States, working with the Iraqi government, should launch the comprehensive New Diplomatic Offensive to deal with the problems of Iraq and of the region.

RECOMMENDATION 2: The goals of the diplomatic offensive as it relates to regional players should be to:

  1. Support the unity and territorial integrity of Iraq.
  2. Stop destabilizing interventions and actions by Iraq's neighbors.
  3. Secure Iraq's borders, including the use of joint patrols with neighboring countries.
  4. Prevent the expansion of the instability and conflict beyond Iraq's borders.
  5. Promote economic assistance, commerce, trade, political support, and, if possible, military assistance for the Iraqi government from non-neighboring Muslim nations.
  6. Energize countries to support national political reconciliation in Iraq.
  7. Validate Iraq's legitimacy by resuming diplomatic relations, where appropriate, and reestablishing embassies in Baghdad.
  8. Assist Iraq in establishing active working embassies in key capitals in the region (for example, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia).
  9. Help Iraq reach a mutually acceptable agreement on Kirkuk.
  10. Assist the Iraqi government in achieving certain security, political, and economic milestones, including better performance on issues such as national reconciliation, equitable distribution of oil revenues, and the dismantling of militias.

RECOMMENDATION 22: The President should state that the United States does not seek permanent military bases in Iraq. If the Iraqi government were to request a temporary base or bases, then the U.S. government could consider that request as it would in the case of any other government.

RECOMMENDATION 23: The President should restate that the United States does not seek to control Iraq's oil.

RECOMMENDATION 40: The United States should not make an open-ended commitment to keep large numbers of American troops deployed in Iraq.

RECOMMENDATION 41: The United States must make it clear to the Iraqi government that the United States could carry out its plans, including planned redeployments, even if Iraq does not implement its planned changes. America’s other security needs and the future of our military cannot be made hostage to the actions or inactions of the Iraqi government.

RECOMMENDATION 42: We should seek to complete the training and equipping mission by the first quarter of 2008, as stated by General George Casey on October 24, 2006.

Legislation

The plan categorized fifteen bills that had been introduced in both the House or Senate during the 110th Congress that addressed the various objectives of the plan. By February 2009, most of them had been referred to subcommittees, only three had been voted on in the House, and none had yet been enacted into law.

Objective CategoryBill /
Bill Title
Current StatusDate IntroducedHouse VoteSenate VoteDate Enacted Into Law
Diplomacy / State Department Reform H.R. 3797

New Diplomatic Offensive for Iraq Act

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on October 10, 2007October 10, 2007------
Human Rights / Iraqi Refugees H.R. 2265

Responsibility to Iraqi Refugees Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law on June 25, 2007May 10, 2007------
H.R. 3674

Iraqi Refugee and Internally Displaced Persons Humanitarian Assistance, Resettlement, and Security Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law on November 2, 2007September 26, 2007------
Restoring The Constitution H.R. 3045

Presidential Signing Statements Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties on August 10, 2007July 16, 2007------
H.R. 1416

Habeas Corpus Restoration Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties on March 19, 2007March 8, 2007------
S. 139

Foreign Surveillance Expedited Review Act

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary on January 4, 2007January 4, 2007------
Military Integrity H.R. 4102

Stop Outsourcing Security Act

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned, on November 7, 2007November 7, 2007------
H.R. 400

War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 423 on October 17, 2007January 11, 2007Passed October 9, 2007: 375-3 ----
H.R. 1352

Torture Outsourcing Prevention Act

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 6, 2007March 6, 2007------
H.R. 2740

MEJA Expansion and Enforcement Act of 2007

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 413 on October 5, 2007June 15, 2007Passed October 4, 2007: 389-30 ----
Veterans H.R. 2247

Montgomery GI Bill for Life Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel on June 28, 2007May 9, 2007------
H.R. 2874

Veterans' Health Care Improvement Act of 2007

Referred by Senate to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs on August 3, 2007June 27, 2007Passed July 30, 2007 on voice vote----
H.R. 2702

Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity, and the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs on June 20, 2007June 13, 2007------
Media S. 2332

Media Ownership Act of 2007

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Inouye with amendments on September 15, 2008November 8, 2007------
Energy H.R. 2809

New Apollo Energy Act of 2007

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy, and Research on April 25, 2008June 21, 2007------

Views about the plan

The plan received national press and attention following its unveiling. Ilan Goldenberg, Policy Director at the National Security Network, writing in The New Republic , called it "thoughtful", "a good first step" and "welcome progress". [19] Arianna Huffington at Huffington Post referred to it as "A Contract to Restore America". [14] The plan was also mentioned on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos . Katrina vanden Heuvel, publisher of The Nation magazine, called the plan "responsible", saying "there are no military solutions". However, Political commentator Cokie Roberts stated that withdrawal from Iraq, one of the goals of the plan, would be "an irresponsible thing to do", claiming "Americans would prefer to win". [20] [21] There were also indications that, within the Democratic Party, the plan had some influence in the debate, with the plan cited on the House floor in 2008. [22] and "helped focus" actions in the House according to Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking about the plan and Burner's efforts in a June 2008 interview. [23]

While the plan received support from the liberal blogosphere and grassroots organizations, such as OpenLeft [24] and Daily Kos, [17] it was panned and received criticism from Republicans in Congress and other conservative commentators. Dave Reichert, Congressman for Washington's 8th district said, through his spokesman, that he believed "military leaders on the ground not candidates for political office should make decisions about when and how to end the war". [25] Reichert's spokesman also suggested that "it would be irresponsible to withdraw troops and then send U.S. money 'into a black hole.'" [25]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Iraq actively researched and later employed weapons of mass destruction (WMD) from 1962 to 1991, when it destroyed its chemical weapons stockpile and halted its biological and nuclear weapon programs as required by the United Nations Security Council. The fifth president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was internationally condemned for his use of chemical weapons against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during the Iran–Iraq War in the 1980s. Saddam pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built. After the Gulf War, the United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials; Iraq ceased its chemical, biological and nuclear programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International reactions to the prelude to the Iraq War</span> Pre-war responses

This article describes the positions of world governments before the actual initiation of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and not their current positions as they may have changed since then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to the Iraq War</span>

Opposition to the Iraq War significantly occurred worldwide, both before and during the initial 2003 invasion of Iraq by a United States–led coalition, and throughout the subsequent occupation. Individuals and groups opposing the war include the governments of many nations which did not take part in the invasion, including both its land neighbors Canada and Mexico, its NATO allies in Europe such as France and Germany, as well as China and Indonesia in Asia, and significant sections of the populace in those that took part in the invasion. Opposition to the war was also widespread domestically.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq Survey Group</span>

The Iraq Survey Group (ISG) was a fact-finding mission sent by the multinational force in Iraq to find the weapons of mass destruction alleged to be possessed by Iraq that had been the main ostensible reason for the invasion in 2003. Its final report, Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence on Iraq WMD, was submitted to Congress and the president in 2004. It consisted of a 1,400-member international team organized by the Pentagon and Central Intelligence Agency to hunt for the alleged stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological agents, and any supporting research programs and infrastructure that could be used to develop WMD. The report acknowledged that only small stockpiles of chemical WMDs were found, the numbers being inadequate to pose a militarily significant threat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dave Reichert</span> American politician (born 1950)

David George Reichert is an American politician, former law enforcement officer, and former member of the Air Force Reserve who served as the U.S. representative for Washington's 8th congressional district from 2005 to 2019. He is a Republican and a former elected Sheriff of King County, Washington. In September 2017, Reichert announced that he would retire from Congress after his seventh term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Withdrawal of United States troops from Iraq (2007–2011)</span> 2007–2011 withdrawal

The withdrawal of the United States troops from Iraq began in December 2007 with the end of the Iraq War troop surge of 2007 and was mostly completed by December 2011, bringing an end to the Iraq War. The number of U.S. military forces in Iraq peaked at 170,300 in November 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of the Iraq War</span>

The U.S. rationale for the Iraq War has faced heavy criticism from an array of popular and official sources both inside and outside the United States. Putting this controversy aside, both proponents and opponents of the invasion have also criticized the prosecution of the war effort along a number of lines. Most significantly, critics have assailed the U.S. and its allies for not devoting enough troops to the mission, not adequately planning for post-invasion Iraq, and for permitting and perpetrating widespread human rights abuses. As the war has progressed, critics have also railed against the high human and financial costs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Efforts to impeach George W. Bush</span> Talks and activities of a possible impeachment of George W. Bush

During the presidency of George W. Bush, several American politicians sought to either investigate Bush for possible impeachable offenses, or to bring actual impeachment charges on the floor of the United States House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. The most significant of these efforts occurred on June 10, 2008, when Congressman Dennis Kucinich, along with co-sponsor Robert Wexler, introduced 35 articles of impeachment against Bush to the U.S. House of Representatives. The House voted 251 to 166 to refer the impeachment resolution to the Judiciary Committee on June 11, where no further action was taken on it. Bush's presidency ended on January 20, 2009, with the completion of his second term in office, rendering impeachment efforts moot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cindy Sheehan</span> American antiwar activist

Cindy Lee Sheehan is an American anti-war activist, whose son, U.S. Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, was killed by enemy action during the Iraq War. She attracted national and international media attention in August 2005 for her extended antiwar protest at a makeshift camp outside President George W. Bush's Texas ranch—a stand that drew both passionate support and criticism. Sheehan ran unsuccessfully for Congress in 2008. She was a vocal critic of President Barack Obama's foreign policy. Her memoir, Peace Mom: A Mother's Journey Through Heartache to Activism, was published in 2006. In an interview with The Daily Beast in 2017, Sheehan continued to hold her critical views towards George W. Bush, while also criticizing the militarism of Donald Trump.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Darcy Burner</span> American businesswoman and politician

Darcy Gibbons Burner is an American businesswoman and politician and a member of the Democratic Party from Carnation, Washington.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protests against the war in Afghanistan</span>

The proposed invasion of Afghanistan prompted protests with mass demonstrations in the days leading up to the official launch of the war on October 7, 2001. The continuation of the war in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2021 lead to further protest and opposition to hostilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rationale for the Iraq War</span> U.S. claims and arguments for invading Iraq

There are various rationales for the Iraq War, both the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the subsequent hostilities. The George W. Bush administration began actively pressing for military intervention in Iraq in late 2001. The primary rationalization for the Iraq War was articulated by a joint resolution of the United States Congress known as the Iraq Resolution. The US claimed the intent was to "disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free Iraqi people".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 United States House of Representatives elections in Washington</span> House elections for the 110th U.S. Congress

Elections were held in Washington state in 2006 for seats in the United States House of Representatives. Of the nine congressional districts, six were won by Democrats and three by Republicans, with the Democrats taking 64% of the vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq Study Group</span>

The Iraq Study Group (ISG) also known as the Baker-Hamilton Commission was a ten-person bipartisan panel appointed on March 15, 2006, by the United States Congress, that was charged with assessing the situation in Iraq and the US-led Iraq War and making policy recommendations. The panel was led by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Democratic congressman from Indiana, Lee H. Hamilton and was first proposed by Virginia Republican Representative Frank Wolf.

<i>Iraq Study Group Report</i>

The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward – A New Approach is the report of the Iraq Study Group, as mandated by the United States Congress. It is an assessment of the state of the war in Iraq as of December 6, 2006, when the ISG released the report to the public on the Internet and as a published book. The report was seen as crucial by Bush, who declared: "And truth of the matter is, a lot of reports in Washington are never read by anybody. To show you how important this one is, I read it, and [Tony Blair] read it."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq War troop surge of 2007</span> Increase in US soldiers stationed in Iraq

The Iraq War troop surge of 2007, commonly known as the troop surge, or simply the surge, refers to the George W. Bush administration's 2007 increase in the number of U.S. military combat troops in Iraq in order to provide security to Baghdad and Al Anbar Governorate.

The 2008 presidential campaign of Mike Gravel, former Speaker of the Alaska House of Representatives and United States Senator from Alaska, began on April 17, 2006, when he declared his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States in the 2008 election, in a speech to the National Press Club.

Timeline of the Iraq War troop surge of 2007

The platform of the Democratic Party of the United States is generally based on American liberalism, contrasting with the conservatism of the Republican Party. The party has large centrist and progressive wings, as well as smaller fiscal conservative and democratic socialist elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraqi conflict</span> Series of related conflicts since the 2003 invasion of Iraq

The Iraqi conflict refers to a near-continuous series of violent events that began with the 2003 Anglo-American invasion of Iraq and deposition of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, the most recent of which is the ISIS conflict in which the Iraqi government declared victory in 2017.

References

  1. The Plan Archived June 16, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  2. Schifferes, Steve (2003-03-18). "US Names Coalition of the Willing". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  3. Nagourney, Adam; Thee, Megan (2006-11-02). "With Election Driven by Iraq, Voters Want New Approach". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  4. "Bush rejects key proposals on Iraq". China Daily. 2006-12-08. Archived from the original on 2 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  5. "General says Iraq talks critical". BBC News. 2007-03-08. Retrieved 2008-07-06. There is no military solution to a problem like that in Iraq, to the insurgency of Iraq
  6. "US military Iraq toll hits 4,000". BBC News. 2008-03-24. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  7. "Iraq Coalition Casualty Count". Archived from the original on 2008-06-25. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  8. "The War in Iraq Costs". National Priorities Project. Archived from the original on 2005-10-12. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  9. "Bush makes quick fundraising stop in Bellevue". KOMO 4 News. 2007-08-27. Retrieved 2016-07-22.
  10. Grygiel, Chris (2007-08-24). "Burner to stage "virtual" town hall to counter Bush visit". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  11. 1 2 Burner, Darcy (2007-08-29). "People-powered politics is changing things". Daily Kos. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  12. "Take Back America conference". Archived from the original on 2021-05-06. Retrieved 2008-07-09.
  13. Darcy Burner's speaks at Take America Back Conference. Washington, DC. 2008-03-17. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  14. 1 2 Huffington, Arianna (2008-03-30). "A Responsible Plan to End the War". HuffingtonPost. Archived from the original on 12 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-04.
  15. General Eaton for Take Back America Conference. March 2008. Archived from the original on 15 August 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  16. Brig. Gen. John Johns for Take Back America Conference. March 2008. Archived from the original on 15 August 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  17. 1 2 "Five Years Later, A Responsible Plan to End the War". Daily Kos. 2008-03-19. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  18. "Responsible Plan and Mission Accomplished Day". OpenLeft. 2008-05-01. Archived from the original on 2008-05-07. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  19. Goldenberg, Ilan (2008-04-02). "Leaving an Occupied Country Is Hard To Do". The New Republic. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  20. vanden Heuvel, Katrina; Roberts, Cokie; Stephanopoulos, George (2008-04-06). Responsible Plan on ABC's This Week (Television production). Washington, D.C.: ABC. Retrieved 2008-07-05.[ dead YouTube link ]
  21. Greenwald, Glenn (2008-04-07). "Cokie Roberts speaks out on the war on behalf of the American people". Salon.com . Archived from the original on 26 July 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-11.
  22. Inslee on supplemental war spending bill (Television production). Washington, D.C. May 2008. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  23. Postman, David (2008-06-14). "House speaker sees bright future for Democrats". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 17 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  24. "The Responsible Plan In Action". Open Left. 2008-04-01. Archived from the original on 2011-07-27. Retrieved 2008-07-05.
  25. 1 2 Heffter, Emily (2008-03-18). "Burner's plan on Iraq signals war likely key issue in race". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 9 July 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-11.