Abortion shield laws in the United States

Last updated

Abortion shield laws in the United States are enacted in states where abortion is legal to protect healthcare practitioners who provide abortion services for patients from states where abortion is illegal. California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Vermont and Washington have passed laws to also protect telehealth actions when the provider prescribes abortion pills to a patient who is in an antiabortion state. [1]

Contents

These shield laws have been enacted after the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade with Dobbs in June 2022. [2] [3]

States with abortion shield laws

As of June 2024, abortion shield laws are on the books in DC and 18 states: [4]

California

California has passed a package of 12 bills (which amended several existing statutes) including: [5] [6]

Maine

Maine has some of the least restrictive abortion laws in the country, and its shield law includes protections for abortion, fertility treatments and contraception. [7]

Massachusetts

The abortion shield law in Massachusetts protects telehealth abortion providers and gender-affirming care providers from out-of-state prosecution by categorizing all virtual encounters with patients in anti-abortion states as local. [8]

History

In 2023 a paper was published in the Columbia Law Review about ways in which shield laws could protect medical practitioners providing abortion who treated patients in US states that prohibited abortion. [9] Following publication of the paper, several states passed shield laws for medical practitioners. As of July 2023 fifteen states had such shield laws, and five had telemedicine provisions, specifically protecting a provider who prescribed and mailed abortion pills to a patient in a state where abortion was banned. [10] From 18 June 2023 Aid Access mailed medication to patients throughout the US with providers licensed in the five states with telemedicine provisions, with no need to ship from other countries as had been necessary before. It was expected that legal battles would follow as the shield laws were tested in court. Patients themselves were not protected by the shield laws, and remained subject to prosecution for self-managing abortions. [10]

Starting in 2023, several states passed abortion shield laws. Thereafter, practitioners in those states started to use the telehealth process to screen out-of-state patients, and in some cases, the practitioners prescribed the abortion pill, which was mailed to the patient from out-of-state. [11]

Before the landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization , telehealth accounted for 4% of abortions in the US, and after Dobbs, the percentage increased to 16%. [12] By December 2023, telehealth accounted for 19% of all abortions in the US. [13] Telehealth accounted for 20% of all abortion care in the first three months of 2024. [14]

From October through December 2023, nearly 8,000 people per month in anti-abortion states were getting abortion medication from clinicians operating in states with shield laws. [15] In 10 anti-abortion states, the number of women receiving abortions increased between 2020 and the end of 2023. [16] Nationally, the first half of 2024 recorded approximately 587,000 abortions, an increase of 12% from the same period in 2023. [16]

In April 2024 a man in Texas invoked the Texas Heartbeat Act to bring legal action against his ex-partner and healthcare providers in Colorado for her abortion there. [17]

In December 2024 Texas sued a New York doctor for allegedly prescribing abortion pills to a 20-year-old Dallas-area woman. [18] [19] [20] The complaint tests the Texas abortion ban against a 2022 New York shield law. [21] [22] [23]

Shield laws, in general, have complicated legal issues surrounding them, primarily because they deal with interstate relations. There has also been scholarly discussion as whether abortion shield laws—particularly those prohibiting the enforcement of judgements or injunctions (provisions designed to hobble the Texas Heartbeat Act and its progeny) arising from laws limiting abortion access—would withstand constitutional challenges claiming such laws are in violation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause. [24] The following is the text of Article IV, Section, Clause 1, commonly known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause:

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

Another source of potential constitutional uncertainty may arise from the Extradition Clause . [25] The text of the Extradition Clause is found in Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

Shield law provisions may deny extradition of people who were not in the other state when they allegedly committed the crime. Some abortion shield laws are broad, and apply to all conduct (not just abortion) that is not punishable in the shielding state. Other states have protection that is specific to reproductive health care. [2]

Standard telehealth practice and policy is to consider medical care to have occurred where the patient is located. This means a state with an abortion ban would consider a medical care provider to have broken that state's laws if that provider used telehealth to provide abortion care to a patient located in a state that bans abortion. However, Massachusetts' shield law applies "regardless of the patient's location." This might mean that a Massachusetts provider, licensed and located in Massachusetts, can take advantage of the protections of the state's shield law no matter where the patient receives the care. Currently a one-of-a-kind provision, this provision poses several open questions regarding how it would work in practice. [2]

Executive orders

Executive orders are issued by governors, and are an alternative to legislation. However, executive orders only apply to administrative acts and procedures under the umbrella of the executive branch, and so they are not as powerful as laws passed by legislatures. As of Feb 2024, governors have issued executive orders in 12 states: California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Washington. These executive orders address topics such as license discipline, extradition, and executive agency cooperation. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span>

In the United States, abortion is a divisive issue in politics and culture wars, though a majority of Americans support access to abortion. Abortion laws vary widely from state to state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telehealth</span> Health care by telecommunication

Telehealth is the distribution of health-related services and information via electronic information and telecommunication technologies. It allows long-distance patient and clinician contact, care, advice, reminders, education, intervention, monitoring, and remote admissions. Telemedicine is sometimes used as a synonym, or is used in a more limited sense to describe remote clinical services, such as diagnosis and monitoring. When rural settings, lack of transport, a lack of mobility, conditions due to outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics, decreased funding, or a lack of staff restrict access to care, telehealth may bridge the gap as well as provide distance-learning; meetings, supervision, and presentations between practitioners; online information and health data management and healthcare system integration. Telehealth could include two clinicians discussing a case over video conference; a robotic surgery occurring through remote access; physical therapy done via digital monitoring instruments, live feed and application combinations; tests being forwarded between facilities for interpretation by a higher specialist; home monitoring through continuous sending of patient health data; client to practitioner online conference; or even videophone interpretation during a consult.

Conscience clauses are legal clauses attached to laws in some parts of the United States and other countries which permit pharmacists, physicians, and/or other providers of health care not to provide certain medical services for reasons of religion or conscience. It can also involve parents withholding consenting for particular treatments for their children.

Home automation for the elderly and disabled focuses on making it possible for older adults and people with disabilities to remain at home, safe and comfortable. Home automation is becoming a viable option for older adults and people with disabilities who would prefer to stay in the comfort of their homes rather than move to a healthcare facility. This field uses much of the same technology and equipment as home automation for security, entertainment, and energy conservation but tailors it towards old people and people with disabilities.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span>

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly, depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction, although there is no uniform federal law. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with few exceptions; others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while some allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

Abortion is the termination of human pregnancy, often performed in the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. In 1973, the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade recognized a constitutional right to obtain an abortion without excessive government restriction, and in 1992 the Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey invalidated restrictions that create an undue burden on people seeking abortions. Since then, there has continued to be an abortion debate in the United States, and some states have passed laws in the form of regulation of abortions but which have the purpose or effect of restricting its provision. The proponents of such laws argue they do not create an undue burden. Some state laws that impact the availability of abortions have been upheld by courts. In 2022, Roe and Casey were overturned by the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, meaning that states may now regulate abortion in ways that were not previously permitted.

A medical abortion, also known as medication abortion or non-surgical abortion, occurs when drugs (medication) are used to bring about an abortion. Medical abortions are an alternative to surgical abortions such as vacuum aspiration or dilation and curettage. Medical abortions are more common than surgical abortions in most places around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teladoc Health</span> American healthcare company

Teladoc Health, Inc. is a multinational telemedicine and virtual healthcare company headquartered in the United States. Primary services include telehealth, medical opinions, AI and analytics, telehealth devices and licensable platform services. In particular, Teladoc Health uses telephone and videoconferencing software as well as mobile apps to provide on-demand remote medical care.

carafem American nonprofit organization

Carafem is an American nonprofit organization that provides women's reproductive health services with centers in Maryland, Atlanta Georgia, Chicago Illinois, and Nashville TN metro areas as well as virtual care in select states. The organization seeks to normalize, "de-medicalize" and remove the social stigma from the provision of birth control and early abortions amidst an ongoing polarized and politicized debate on abortion in the United States. The organization intentionally uses certain language, such as "health center" instead of "clinic", and openly uses the word "abortion" in its advertising.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aid Access</span> Abortion services provider

Aid Access is a nonprofit organization that provides access to medication abortion by mail to the United States and worldwide. It describes its work as a harm reduction strategy designed to provide safe access to mifepristone and misoprostol for those able to become pregnant in the United States who may not otherwise have access to abortion or miscarriage management services. People are able to manage their own abortion with remote access to a physician and a help-desk for any questions. The website is available in English, Spanish, and Dutch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rebecca Bauer-Kahan</span> Member of the California State Assembly

Rebecca Beth Bauer-Kahan is an American attorney and politician who has served as a member of the California State Assembly from the 16th district since 2018. A member of the Democratic Party, her district extends from Lamorinda to the Tri-Valley region of the San Francisco Bay Area. She has been described as a women's rights advocate.

Abortion in Maryland is legal at all stages of pregnancy. The first laws regulating abortion in the state were passed in 1867 and 1868, banning abortion except by a physician to "secure the safety of the mother." Abortion providers continued to operate both within and outside of the law. Legal enforcement became more strict from the 1940s through 60s, with numerous police raids on abortion providers. In 1968, Maryland passed a liberalized abortion law that clarified the wording of the previous law, allowing abortion in hospital settings in cases of rape, severe fetal deformity, or when life and health were endangered.

Abortion in Wyoming is legal up to fetal viability. A temporary court injunction was filed against an attempted near total abortion ban in 2023, and a Wyoming judge struck down the abortion ban in 2024.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), returning to the federal and state legislatures the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal statutory law.

House Bill 5414, passed by the Connecticut General Assembly and signed into law by that U.S. state's Governor, Ned Lamont, on May 5, 2022, as the Reproductive Freedom Defense Act, is intended to protect abortion in the state and expand the procedure's availability. Several of its provisions are responses to the Texas Heartbeat Act, passed in late 2021 and since emulated by two other states, that would prevent enforcement in Connecticut of judgements obtained by lawsuits filed under those laws against abortion providers, patients and those who facilitate them. It also allows more non-physician providers to perform certain types of abortions, codifying a past legal opinion. The law took effect July 1.

Plan C is a non-profit organization and campaign that provides educational resources and information to increase access to medication abortion in the United States. It was founded in 2015 by Francine Coeytaux, Elisa Wells, and Amy Merrill as a project under the fiscal sponsorship of the National Women's Health Network.

Mayday Health is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that educates on medication abortion and how to access it in the United States. It was founded in 2022 in response to the Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) court decision that limited access to abortion in many U.S. states. Mayday educates on self-managed abortion and does not sell or distribute the abortion pill. Mayday was founded after the leak of the Dobbs v. Jackson decision that overturned Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). The organization launched on the day of the Dobbs decision.

Hey Jane is a New York City-based healthcare company that provides abortion-related healthcare services in the United States. The original focus of Hey Jane was to provide medication abortion services to women, particularly women who were unable to conveniently visit abortion providers.

References

  1. ↑ Stein, Shira (June 11, 2024). "The unexpected opponent to telehealth abortion shield laws: Planned Parenthood".
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Abortion Shield Laws" David S. Cohen et al, March 28, 2023 NEJM Evid 2023;2(4) DOI: 10.1056/EVIDra2200280 VOL. 2 NO. 4 https://evidence.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/EVIDra2200280
  3. ↑ Gomez, Ivette; Diep, Karen; Felix, Mabel; Salganicoff, Alina (June 20, 2024). "10 Things to Know About Abortion Access Since the Dobbs Decision". KFF.
  4. ↑ "Interstate Shield Laws". Center for Reproductive Rights. June 26, 2024.
  5. ↑ "Newsom signs abortion protections into law" Kristen Hwang, Cal Matters, 27 Sept 2023, https://calmatters.org/health/2022/09/california-abortion-bills/
  6. ↑ "California Expands Access and Protections for Reproductive Health Care" Office of California Governor, 27 Sept 2023 https://www.gov.ca.gov/2023/09/27/california-expands-access-and-protections-for-reproductive-health-care/
  7. ↑ Davis, Emma (August 8, 2024). "Maine shield law protecting reproductive, gender-affirming care takes effect Friday". Maine Morning Star.
  8. ↑ Piore, Adam (June 21, 2024). "How Massachusetts became the center of resistance to anti-abortion forces". Boston Globe.
  9. ↑ Cohen, David S.; Donley, Greer; Rebouché, Rachel (January 2023). "THE NEW ABORTION BATTLEGROUND". Columbia Law Review. 123 (1).
  10. 1 2 Grant, Rebecca (23 July 2023). "Group using 'shield laws' to provide abortion care in states that ban it". The Guardian.
  11. ↑ "Abortion Shield Laws: A New War Between the States", Pam Belluck, 28 Feb 2024, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/health/abortion-shield-laws-telemedicine.html
  12. ↑ Telehealth abortions on the rise since Dobbs, new report shows Sofia Resnick, New Jersey Monitor, February 28, 2024
  13. ↑ Sherman, Carter (14 May 2024). "New laws help people in US states with bans get abortion pills: 'Most people don't know it's available'". The Guardian.
  14. ↑ MOSELEY-MORRIS, KELCIE (August 13, 2024). "Telehealth abortion still on the rise, especially in states with shield laws, report shows". Tennessee Lookout.
  15. ↑ WEIXEL, Nathaniel (May 20, 2024). "Red state abortion bans headed for clash with blue state shield laws". The Hill.
  16. 1 2 Sanger-Katz, Margot; Cain Miller, Claire (October 22, 2024). "Abortions Have Increased, Even for Women in States With Rigid Bans, Study Says". New York Times.
  17. ↑ Alonso Galva, Alejandro A. (May 7, 2024). "A Texas woman got an abortion in Colorado, now her ex wants to subpoena her. A state shield law might stand in his way". CPR News.
  18. ↑ Calfa, Jennifer; Kusisto, Laura (December 13, 2024). "Texas Sues New York Doctor, Challenging Abortion Provider Shield Laws". Wall Street Journal.
  19. ↑ Honderich, Holly (14 December 2024). "Texas sues New York doctor accused of posting abortion pills". BBC News.
  20. ↑ "Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Activist New York Doctor for Illegally Providing Abortion Drugs Across State Lines". Attorney General Ken Paxton. December 13, 2024.
  21. ↑ Wagner, Bayliss (13 December 2024). "Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton files first lawsuit against out-of-state abortion provider". Austin American-Statesman.
  22. ↑ Heyward, Giulia (December 14, 2024). "Texas sues NY doctor over abortion pills, setting up a showdown over shield laws". Gothamist.
  23. ↑ Murphy, Sean; Hill, Michael; MULVIHILL, Geoff (December 13, 2024). "Texas' abortion pill lawsuit against New York doctor marks new challenge to interstate telemedicine". Associated Press.
  24. ↑ Review, Stanford Law; Sri-Kumar, Saj Sundar (2024-01-23). "Abortion, Blocking Laws, and the Full Faith and Credit Clause". Stanford Law Review. Retrieved 2024-03-15.
  25. ↑ Caraballo, Alejandra (2022-07-29). "We're Going to See Abortion Fugitives. Here's How to Protect Them". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved 2024-03-15.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.