Abortion and the Catholic Church in the United States

Last updated

The Catholic Church and abortion in the United States deals with the views and activities of the Catholic Church in the United States in relation to the abortion debate. The Catholic Church opposes abortion and has campaigned against abortion in the United States, both saying that it is immoral and making statements and taking actions in opposition to its classification as legal.

Contents

Many Catholics in the United States disagree with the official position promulgated by the Church; the views of these people range from allowing exceptions in a generally anti-abortion position, to complete acceptance of abortion. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] There is a distinction between practicing Catholics and non-practicing Catholics on the issue; practicing Catholics, along with Latino Catholics, are far more likely to be anti-abortion, while non-practicing Catholics are more likely to be in favor of abortion legalization. [3] [4] [5] [6]

Into the 21st century, the church's opposition to abortion, and specifically the actions it has taken against pro-abortion rights Catholics, has often been the subject of controversy.

History

19th century

In the latter half of the 19th century, the Catholic Church in the United States took the lead in denouncing what it termed "criminal abortion". The Michigan State Medical Society journal reported in 1870 that, while most churches were "neglecting" the subject of abortion, Catholic priests were teaching that "destruction of the embryo at any period from the first instant of conception is a crime equal in guilt to that of murder," and "that to admit its practice is to open the way for the most unbridled licentiousness, and to take away the responsibility of maternity is to destroy one of the strongest bulwarks of female virtue." [7] In 1881 the same journal reported that Catholic anti-abortion efforts had been much more successful than Protestant ones. [8]

Role in the abortion debate

Following the 1968 publication of Humanae Vitae , an encyclical by Pope Paul VI that expressly forbade abortion and most methods of birth control [9] and that sowed controversy within the church over its restatement of the prohibition on birth control, [10] Catholic bishops in the United States started to stress anti-abortion views as a central facet of Catholic identity and preached against proposed liberalization of state-level abortion laws. [10]

Before the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which resulted in the legalization of abortion in the United States, the United States right-to-life movement consisted of lawyers, politicians, and doctors, almost all of whom were Catholic.[ citation needed ] The only coordinated opposition to abortion during the early 1970s came from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Family Life Bureau, also a Catholic organization. According to Charles Curran, prior to Roe v. Wade, abortion was not a high priority for Catholic bishops in the United States. [11]

According to Curran, the level of involvement of the Catholic hierarchy changed dramatically after Roe v. Wade. A short time after the decision, the Catholic-sponsored National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) was created to mobilize a wide-scale anti-abortion movement. The NRLC also organized non-Catholics, and eventually become the largest anti-abortion organization in the United States. Curran asserts that, since Roe v. Wade, the Catholic hierarchy in the United States has devoted more time, energy and money to the issue of abortion than any other single issue. [11]

The American media has followed and reported on the substantial role of the Catholic Church in the abortion debate. [11] Connie Paige has been quoted as having said that: "[t]he Roman Catholic Church created the right-to-life movement. Without the church, the movement would not exist as such today." [12]

At the same time, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, in Forming consciences for Faithful Citizenship, [13] quoted the words of Pope John Paul II: "The fact that only the negative commandments oblige always and under all circumstances does not mean that in the moral life prohibitions are more important than the obligation to do good indicated by the positive commandment." [14]

Dissenting Catholics

An independent organization called Catholics for Choice was founded in 1973 to support the availability of abortion, stating that this position is compatible with Catholic teachings, particularly the primacy of conscience and the importance of the laity in shaping church law. [15] This organization was founded "to serve as a voice for Catholics" who believe that contraception and abortion are moral. [16] Catholics for Choice believe:

Church teachings, tradition and core Catholic tenets—including the primacy of conscience, the role of the faithful in defining legitimate laws and norms, and support for the separation of church and state—leave room for supporting a more liberal position on abortion. ... Catholics can, in good conscience, support access to abortion and affirm that abortion can be a moral choice. Indeed, many of us do. [15]

In October 1984, Catholics for Choice (then Catholics for a Free Choice) placed an advertisement, called "A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion" and signed by over one hundred prominent Catholics, including nuns, in the New York Times. The advertisement stated that "direct abortion...can sometimes be a moral choice" and that "responsible moral decisions can only be made in an atmosphere of freedom from fear of coercion." The Vatican initiated disciplinary measures against some of the nuns who signed the statement, sparking controversy among American Catholics, and intra-Catholic conflict on the abortion issue remained news for at least two years in the United States. [17]

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has stated that "[CFC] is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See and the USCCB." [18] Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz excommunicated all members of this organization in his jurisdiction in 1996. [19]

Margaret McBride

In November 2009, when Sister Margaret McBride, as a member of the ethics board of a Catholic hospital, allowed doctors to perform an abortion to save the life of a mother of four suffering from pulmonary hypertension, Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted excommunicated her on the grounds that, while efforts should be made to save a pregnant woman's life, abortion cannot be used as a means to that end. [20] [21]

Politics

Pro-abortion rights Catholic politicians

Since the Catholic Church views abortion as gravely wrong, it considers it a duty to reduce its acceptance by the public and in civil legislation. While it considers that Catholics should not favour direct abortion in any field, it recognizes that Catholics may accept compromises that, while permitting direct abortions, lessen their incidence by, for instance, restricting some forms or enacting remedies against the conditions that give rise to them. [22]

In 1990, John Cardinal O'Connor of New York suggested that, by supporting abortion rights, Catholic politicians who were pro-abortion rights risked excommunication. The response of Catholic pro-abortion rights politicians to O'Connor's comment was generally defiant. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi asserted that, "There is no desire to fight with the cardinals or archbishops. But it has to be clear that we are elected officials and we uphold the law and we support public positions separate and apart from our Catholic faith." [23]

There has been controversy in the United States over whether Catholic politicians who promote legalization of abortion should be denied communion. Most instances of such controversy have involved a bishop threatening to deny a politician communion, although other cases have involved a bishop telling a politician not to seek communion or considering excommunicating the politician. Those bishops who support denying communion, including Raymond Leo Burke, base their position on Canon 915. [24]

Because few American bishops are in favor of withholding communion from politicians and the majority are opposed, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops decided in 2004 that such matters should left to the discretion of each bishop on a case-by-case basis. [25]

These statements of intent from church authorities have sometimes led American Catholic voters to vote for candidates who wish to ban abortion, rather than pro-abortion rights candidates who support other Catholic Church positions, such as war, health care, immigration, or lowering the abortion rate. [26] Penalties of this kind from bishops have targeted Democrats, although a number of prominent Republican politicians are also pro-abortion rights. [27]

Politicians who have been targeted in such controversies include Lucy Killea, [28] Mario Cuomo, [29] John Kerry, [30] Rudy Giuliani, [31] and Joe Biden. [26] Killea's case was the first recorded; [28] Kerry's led to comparisons between his presidential campaign and that of John F. Kennedy in 1960. While Kennedy had to demonstrate his independence from the Roman Catholic Church due to public fear that a Catholic president would make decisions based on Vatican commands, it seemed that Kerry, in contrast, had to show obedience to Catholic authorities in order to win votes. [27] [32] [33] [34] [35]

Proposals to deny communion to pro-abortion rights politicians are unique to the United States. Suggested reasons for this uniqueness are a politicization of pastoral practice and abortion's constitutional status as a right. [25] [36]

Attitudes of Catholic laity

Many or most U.S. Catholics disagree with official Church teaching on abortion in some or all particulars. The distribution of views among U.S. Catholics regarding abortion is substantially the same as the distribution of views among non-Catholics.

Moral acceptability

Analysis of the 2006-2008 Gallup Values and Beliefs surveys indicates that 40% of Catholics consider abortion "morally acceptable", a result that is roughly equivalent to the 41% of non-Catholics holding the same view. [37] According to 1995 survey by Lake Research and Tarrance Group, 64% of U.S. Catholics say they disapprove of the statement that "abortion is morally wrong in every case". [38] According to 2016 survey by Pew Research Center, 51% of U.S. Catholics say that "having an abortion is morally wrong". [39] According to Marist College Institute for Public Opinion's survey released in 2008, 36% of practising Catholics, defined as those who attend church at least twice a month, consider themselves "pro-choice"; while 65% of non-practicing Catholics considers themselves "pro-choice", 76% of them says that "abortion should be significantly restricted". [40] According to the National Catholic Reporter , some 58% of American Catholic women feel that they do not have to follow the abortion teaching of their bishop. [41]

Legality

Between 16% and 22% of American Catholic voters share the view that abortion should never be permitted by law. [1] [2] [3] [42] According to 2009 survey by Pew Research Center, 47% of American Catholics believe that abortion should be legal in "all or most cases", while 42% of American Catholics believe that abortion should be illegal in "all or most cases". [5] When posed a binary question of whether abortion was acceptable or unacceptable, rather than a question of whether it should be allowed or not allowed in all or most cases, according to polls conducted in 2006-2008 by Gallup, 40% of American Catholics said it was acceptable, approximately the same percentage as non-Catholics; [4] 58% of American Catholics said it was morally wrong. [6]

It is said that "Latino Catholics" in the United States are also more likely to oppose abortion than "White Catholics". [6]

Some reasons for dissenting from the church's position on the legality of abortion, other than finding abortion morally acceptable, include "I am personally opposed to abortion, but I think the Church is concentrating its energies too much on abortion rather than on social action" [43] or "I do not wish to impose my views on others." [44] [45] [46] [47]

Prevalence of abortion

A 1994-1995 survey conducted by Guttmacher Institute of abortion patients found that "Catholic women have an abortion rate 29% higher than Protestant women." [48]

Attitudes of committed Catholics

Attitudes of U.S. Catholics regarding abortion were found to differ significantly when the polls distinguished between practicing and/or churchgoing Catholics and non-practicing Catholics. Those who attend church weekly are more likely to oppose abortion. [3] [4] [5] [6] According to Marist College Institute for Public Opinion's survey released in 2008, 36% of practising Catholics, defined as those who attend church at least twice a month, consider themselves "pro-choice"; while 65% of non-practicing Catholics considers themselves "pro-choice", 76% of them says that "abortion should be significantly restricted". [40] According to polls conducted in 2006-2008 by Gallup, 24% of practicing Catholics, defined in this poll as those who attend church "weekly or almost every week", believe abortion is morally acceptable. [4]

Compatibility of dissent with Catholic belief

While 58% of American Catholics are likely to agree that abortion is morally wrong, [6] : 23  and 46% of white Catholics and 65% of Latino Catholics are likely to agree that abortion is a sin, [6] : 24  according to 2011 report by Public Religion Research Institute, 68% of American Catholics are likely to agree that one "can still be a good Catholic even if you disagree with official church teaching on abortion," approximately as many as members of other religious groups. [6] : 32  [lower-alpha 1]

On this long-standing phenomenon of a number of Catholics disagreeing with the Church's official position on abortion, Pope John Paul II reiterated in 1987 that it "is a grave error" to "claim[] that dissent from the Magisterium is totally compatible with being a good Catholic and poses no obstacle to the reception of the sacraments." In what the Los Angeles Times called a key admonition, he added: "It has never been easy to accept the Gospel teaching in its entirety, and it never will be." [49] [50]

Voting

Abortion is not the main issue most American Catholics consider when choosing how to vote. A survey in 2008 showed that less than one third (29%) of Catholic voters in the U.S. stated that they choose their candidate based solely on the candidate's position on abortion; most of these vote for anti-abortion candidates. 44% believe a "good Catholic" cannot vote for a pro-abortion rights politician, while 53% believe one can. [1]

Dissenting individuals and groups

Philosopher Daniel Dombrowski wrote, with Richard Deltete, A Brief, Liberal, Catholic Defense of Abortion, which analyzed Church theological history to argue that Catholic values supported a pro-abortion rights position. [51]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Based on a 2011 telephone survey by Public Religion Research Institute with a general sample size of 3000 out of which 612 Catholics including 454 white Catholics and 119 Latino Catholics. [6] : 38–39 

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catholic Church</span> Largest Christian church, led by the Pope

The Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church, is the largest Christian church, with 1.3 billion baptized Catholics worldwide as of 2019. It is among the world's oldest and largest international institutions, and has played a prominent role in the history and development of Western civilization. The church consists of 24 sui iuris churches, including the Latin Church and 23 Eastern Catholic Churches, which comprise almost 3,500 dioceses and eparchies located around the world. The pope, who is the bishop of Rome, is the chief pastor of the church. The bishopric of Rome, known as the Holy See, is the central governing authority of the church. The administrative body of the Holy See, the Roman Curia, has its principal offices in Vatican City, a small enclave of the Italian city of Rome, of which the pope is head of state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raymond Leo Burke</span> American cardinal of the Catholic Church

Raymond Leo Burke is an American prelate of the Catholic Church. A bishop, cardinal, and the incumbent patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, he led the Archdiocese of St. Louis from 2004 to 2008 and the Diocese of La Crosse from 1995 to 2004. From June 2008 to November 2014, he was the prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Conference of Catholic Bishops</span> American Catholic episcopal conference

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is the episcopal conference of the Catholic Church in the United States. Founded in 1966 as the joint National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) and United States Catholic Conference (USCC), it is composed of all active and retired members of the Catholic hierarchy in the United States and the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles J. Chaput</span> American prelate of the Catholic Church

Charles Joseph Chaput is an American prelate of the Roman Catholic Church. He was the ninth archbishop of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, serving from 2011 until 2020. He previously served as archbishop of the Archdiocese of Denver in Colorado (1997–2011) and bishop of the Diocese of Rapid City in South Dakota (1988–1997). Chaput was the first archbishop of Philadelphia in 100 years who was not named a cardinal.

Prior to the 20th century, three major branches of Christianity—Catholicism, Orthodoxy and Protestantism—including leading Protestant reformers Martin Luther and John Calvin generally held a critical perspective of birth control. Among Christian denominations today, however, there is a large variety of views regarding birth control that range from the acceptance of birth control to only allowing natural family planning to teaching Quiverfull doctrine, which disallows contraception and holds that Christians should have large families.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States anti-abortion movement</span> Movement in the United States opposing abortion

The United States anti-abortion movement contains elements opposing induced abortion on both moral and religious grounds and supports its legal prohibition or restriction. Advocates generally argue that human life begins at conception and that the human zygote, embryo or fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. The anti-abortion movement includes a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body. There are diverse arguments and rationales for the anti-abortion stance. Some anti-abortion activists allow for some permissible abortions, including therapeutic abortions, in exceptional circumstances such as incest, rape, severe fetal defects, or when the woman's health is at risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catholics for Choice</span> Abortion rights advocacy group

Catholics for Choice (CFC) is a dissenting Catholic abortion rights advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. Formed in 1973 as Catholics for a Free Choice, the group gained notice after its 1984 advertisement in The New York Times challenging Church teaching on abortion led to Church disciplinary pressure against some of the priests and nuns who signed it. It has lobbied nationally and internationally for abortion rights goals and led an unsuccessful effort to downgrade the Holy See's status in the United Nations. CFC was led for 25 years by Frances Kissling and is currently led by its President Jamie L. Manson.

Members of the Catholic Church have been active in the elections of the United States since the mid 19th century. The United States has never had religious parties. There has never been an American Catholic religious party, either local, state or national.

Religious adherents vary widely in their views on birth control. This can be true even between different branches of one faith, as in the case of Judaism and Christianity. Some religious believers find that their own opinions of the use of birth control differ from the beliefs espoused by the leaders of their faith, and many grapple with the ethical dilemma of what is conceived as "correct action" according to their faith, versus personal circumstance, reason, and choice. This article will discuss various views on birth control of the major world religions Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Baha'i.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catholic Church and homosexuality</span> Attitude of the Catholic Church to homosexuality and gay people

The Catholic Church opposes same-sex sexual activity and same-sex marriage. While the Church says it opposes "unjust" discrimination against homosexual persons, it supports what it considers "just" discrimination in the employment of teachers or athletic coaches, in adoption, in the military and in housing. The Catechism of the Catholic Church promulgated by Pope John Paul II considers sexual activity between members of the same sex to be a mortal sin against chastity. It sees homosexual orientation as objectively disordered. This teaching has developed through a number of ecumenical councils and the influence of theologians, including the Church Fathers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Martino</span>

Joseph Francis Martino is an American prelate of the Roman Catholic Church who served as bishop of the Diocese of Scranton in Pennsylvania from 2003 to 2009. He previously served as an auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia from 1996 to 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael John Sheridan</span> Catholic bishop (1945–2022)

Michael John Sheridan was an American prelate of the Catholic Church who served as bishop of the Diocese of Colorado Springs in Colorado from 2003 to 2021. He previously served as an auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of Saint Louis in Missouri from 1997 to 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christianity and abortion</span> Christian denominational views on the issue of abortion

Christianity and abortion have a long and complex history, and there are a variety of positions taken by contemporary Christian denominations on the topic. Although the Bible does not contain any explicit judgment on abortion, there are several biblical passages that have been interpreted as indicating either moral approval or disapproval of abortion. While some writers say that early Christians held different beliefs at different times about abortion, others say that they condemned abortion at any point of pregnancy as a grave sin, a condemnation that they maintained even when some early Christians did not view as homicide the elimination of a fetus not yet "formed" and animated by a human soul. Some authors, such as ethicist Benjamin Wiker, have contrasted the prohibition of abortion in later Christian societies with the availability of abortion that was present in earlier Roman society, arguing that this reflects a wider condemnation of pagan practices.

Canon 915, one of the canons in the 1983 Code of Canon Law of the Latin Church of the Catholic Church, forbids the administration of Holy Communion to those upon whom the penalty of excommunication or interdict has been imposed or declared, or who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin:

Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Tafoya</span>

Arthur Nicholas Tafoya was an American prelate of the Roman Catholic Church. He served as the third bishop of the Diocese of Pueblo in Colorado from 1980 to 2009. His resignation as bishop was accepted by Pope Benedict XVI on October 15, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Paprocki</span> American prelate of the Catholic Church

Thomas John Joseph Paprocki is an American prelate of the Catholic Church who has been serving as bishop of the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois since 2010. He previously served as an auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Chicago in Illinois from 2003 to 2010.

The official teachings of the Catechism of the Catholic Church promulgated by Pope John Paul II in 1992 oppose all forms of abortion procedures whose direct purpose is to destroy a zygote, blastocyst, embryo or fetus, since it holds that "human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person – among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life". However, the Church does recognize as morally legitimate certain acts which indirectly result in the death of the fetus, as when the direct purpose is removal of a cancerous womb. Canon 1397 §2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law imposes automatic excommunication on Latin Catholics who actually procure an abortion, if they fulfill the conditions for being subject to such a sanction. Eastern Catholics are not subject to automatic excommunication, but by canon 1450 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches they are to be excommunicated by decree if found guilty of the same action, and they may be absolved of the sin only by the eparchial bishop. In addition to teaching that abortion is immoral, the Catholic Church also generally makes public statements and takes actions in opposition to its legality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion</span>

"A Catholic Statement on Pluralism and Abortion", alternatively referred to by its pull quote "A Diversity of Opinions Regarding Abortion Exists Among Committed Catholics" or simply "The New York Times ad", was a full-page advertisement placed on October 7, 1984, in The New York Times by Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC). Its publication brought to a head the conflict between the Vatican and those American Catholics who were pro-choice. The publicity and controversy which followed its publication helped to make the CFFC an important element of the pro-choice movement.

Because the Catholic Church opposes abortion as a matter of doctrine, some Catholic bishops have refused or threatened to refuse communion, or threatened to declare excommunication upon Catholic politicians who support abortion rights. In some cases, officials have stated that ministers should refuse communion to such politicians per canon 915 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law; elsewhere, that the politicians should, on their own, refrain from receiving communion ad normam canon 916; and in other cases, excommunication has been suggested.

Since the Catholic Church views abortion as gravely wrong, it considers it a duty to reduce its acceptance by the public and in civil legislation. While it considers that Catholics should not favour abortion in any field, it recognises that Catholics may accept compromises that, while permitting abortions, lessen their incidence by, for instance, restricting some forms or enacting remedies against the conditions that give rise to them. It is accepted that support may be given to a political platform that contains a clause in favour of abortion but also elements that will actually reduce the number of abortions, rather than to an anti-abortion platform that will lead to their increase.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Karkabi, Barbara (October 31, 2008). "Abortion not main issue for Catholics: Survey results contradict bishops' stance". Houston Chronicle.
  2. 1 2 "Notre Dame Should Not Disinvite Obama, U.S. Catholics Tell Quinnipiac University National Poll; Attitudes On Abortion Similar Among All U.S. Voters". Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. May 14, 2009. Archived from the original on May 19, 2009.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Smith, Gregory; Pond, Allison (September 16, 2008). "Slight but Steady Majority Favors Keeping Abortion Legal". Pew Research Center.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Newport, Frank (March 30, 2009). "Catholics Similar to Mainstream on Abortion, Stem Cells". Gallup. The same poll reported American Catholics as more permissive than American non-Catholics on sex between an unmarried man and woman, divorce, medical research using stem cells obtained from human embryos, having a baby outside of marriage, gambling and homosexual relations.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Obama, Catholics and the Notre Dame Commencement". Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. April 30, 2009.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jones, Robert P.; Cox, Daniel; Laser, Rachel (June 9, 2011). "Committed to Availability, Conflicted about Morality: What the Millennial Generation Tells Us about the Future of the Abortion Debate and the Culture Wars" (PDF). Public Religion Research Institute.
  7. ↑ of the Special Committee on Criminal Abortion p. 378.
  8. ↑ of the Washington Obstetrical and Gynecological Society
  9. ↑ "Humanae Vitae". The Vatican. July 25, 1968.
  10. 1 2 Greenhouse, Linda; Stiegal, Reva (2012). Before Roe v. Wade. ISBN   9780615648217.
  11. 1 2 3 Curran, Charles E. (15 February 2011). The social mission of the U.S. Catholic Church: a theological perspective . Georgetown University Press. pp.  153–154. ISBN   978-1-58901-743-6 . Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  12. ↑ Munson, Ziad W. (2008). The making of pro-life activists: how social movement mobilization works. University of Chicago Press. p. 85. ISBN   978-0-226-55120-3 . Retrieved 31 December 2011.
  13. ↑ "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship - Part I - The U.S. Bishops' Reflection on Catholic Teaching and Political Life". www.usccb.org. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
  14. ↑ Veritatis Splendor, no. 52.
  15. 1 2 "The Truth About Catholics and Abortion" (PDF). Catholics for Choice. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-14. Retrieved 2011-12-30.
  16. ↑ "About Us". Catholics for Choice. Archived from the original on 2009-03-07. Retrieved 2011-12-30.
  17. ↑ Dillon, Michele (1999). Catholic identity: balancing reason, faith, and power . Cambridge University Press. p.  106. ISBN   9780521639590.
  18. ↑ NCCB/USCC President Issues Statement on Catholics for a Free Choice
  19. ↑ Vatican affirms excommunication of Call to Action members in Lincoln Archived 2006-12-12 at the Library of Congress Web Archives
  20. ↑ Gibson, David (May 21, 2010). "Nun Excommunicated For Abortion Decision To Save Mother's Life". Politics Daily.
  21. ↑ Garrison, Becky (December 30, 2010). "Playing Catholic politics with US healthcare". The Guardian. London.
  22. ↑ Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton (editors), Encyclopedia of Catholicism (Facts on File 2007 ISBN   978-0-8160-5455-8), p. 5
  23. ↑ Marcovitz, Hal (1 February 2009). Nancy Pelosi: Politician. Infobase Publishing. p. 40. ISBN   978-1-60413-075-1 . Retrieved 17 January 2012.
  24. ↑ NCRegister.com "America's 'Most Complete' Catholic Newsweekly"
  25. 1 2 Sandro Magister, "Obama's Pick for Vice President Is Catholic. But the Bishops Deny Him Communion"
  26. 1 2 Kirkpatrick, David (2008-09-16). "Abortion Issue Again Dividing Catholic Votes". The New York Times . Retrieved 2011-12-26.
  27. 1 2 Ainsworth, Bill (2004-06-09). "Catholics giving governor a pass on abortion". The San-Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2011-01-26. Retrieved 2011-12-26.
  28. 1 2 "A Bishop Says No". Time. November 27, 1989. Archived from the original on March 7, 2008.
  29. ↑ West, John G.; MacLean, Iain S. (1999). Encyclopedia of religion in American politics, Volume 2. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 98. ISBN   9781573561303 . Retrieved 2011-12-26.
  30. ↑ Hancock, David (2004-04-06). "Kerry's Communion Controversy". CBS News. Retrieved 2011-12-26.
  31. ↑ "Outspoken Catholic Archbishop Raymond Burke Says He'd Deny Rudy Giuliani Communion". Fox News. AP. 2007-10-03. Archived from the original on 2013-05-27. Retrieved 2011-12-26.
  32. ↑ McAteer, Michael (June 26, 2004). "Questioning Catholic hierarchy's priorities". Toronto Star.
  33. ↑ Jacoby, Susan (May 3, 2004). "The Catholic Church and the Presidential Election: Vatican makes common cause with fundamentalist Protestants". San Francisco Chronicle.
  34. ↑ Balz, Dan; Cooperman, Alan (June 4, 2004). "Bush, Pope to Meet Today at the Vatican". Washington Post.
  35. ↑ Gibson, David (2007). The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. HarperCollins. p. 42. ISBN   9780061753367.
  36. ↑ "The Word from Rome", John L. Allen Jr. in National Catholic Reporter, 28 May 200
  37. ↑ "Catholics Similar to Mainstream on Abortion, Stem Cells". 30 March 2009. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
  38. ↑ "BBC - Religions - Abortion" . Retrieved 2012-01-05.
  39. ↑ Lipka, Michael; Gramlich, John (January 26, 2017). "5 facts about abortion". Pew Research Center.
  40. 1 2 Gipson, Ashley (October 14, 2008). "Survey: Catholic voters split on abortion, gay marriage". USA Today.
  41. ↑ "Many US Catholics Out of Step with Church on Contraception, Abortion". VOANews.com. Voice of America. April 14, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
  42. ↑ O'Brien, Jon; Morello, Sara (Spring 2008). "Catholics for Choice and Abortion: Pro-choice Catholicism 101". Perspectives: Catholic. Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. Archived from the original on June 11, 2011. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
  43. ↑ [books.google.com/books/about/Catholics_and_American_Politics.html?id=f3oEnwEACAAJ &btnG= Mary T. Hanna, Catholics and American Politics] (Harvard University Press 1979 ISBN   978-0-674-10325-2), p. 154
  44. ↑ John Finnis, Religion and Public Reasons (Oxford University Press 2011 ISBN   978-0-19-958009-5), vol. 5, p. 122
  45. ↑ Susan Elizabeth Davis, Women under Attack (South End Press 1999 ISBN   978-0-89608-356-1), p. 61
  46. ↑ Patrick W. Carey, Catholics in America (Greenwood 2004 ISBN   978-0-275-98255-3), p. 135
  47. ↑ Christopher Robert Kaczor, The Ethics of Abortion (Taylor & Francis 2010 ISBN   978-0-415-88468-6), p. 202
  48. ↑ "ABORTION COMMON AMONG ALL WOMEN -EVEN THOSE THOUGHT TO OPPOSE ABORTION". Archived from the original on 2011-02-20. Retrieved 2011-01-05.
  49. ↑ "Pope Counsels Bishops to Hold to Christ's Teachings in the Face of Dissent". New York Times. 17 September 1987.
  50. ↑ Chandler, Russell (20 September 1987). "Pope Builds Bridges With U.S. Church : Unbending in Policies but Shows Willingness to Listen to Dissent". Los Angeles Times.
  51. ↑ Keller, Rosemary Skinner; Ruether, Rosemary Radford; Cantlon, Marie (2006). Encyclopedia of women and religion in North America, Volume 3. Indiana University Press. p. 1109. ISBN   0253346886.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.