Alkahest

Last updated
Image of Alchimia, the embodiment of alchemy. Woodcut published by Leonhard Thurneysser in 1574. Thurneysser was a student of Paracelsus. Alchimia.gif
Image of Alchimia, the embodiment of alchemy. Woodcut published by Leonhard Thurneysser in 1574. Thurneysser was a student of Paracelsus.

In Renaissance alchemy, alkahest was the theorized "universal solvent". [nb 1] It was supposed to be capable of dissolving any composite substance, including gold (then not considered an element), without altering or destroying its fundamental components. [1] By extracting from composite substances their fundamental virtues and properties, alchemists hoped to gain control of invaluable medical healing properties (see also azoth). For this reason the alkahest was earnestly sought. At the same time, its very existence was debated among alchemists and philosophers.

Contents

The first, or one of the first, to mention the alkahest was the Swiss physician and alchemist Paracelsus. [2]

Etymology

There is no consensus on the origin and etymology of the word alkahest, as Paracelsus left no trace or history of the word. One such view is that the term is of Arabic origin or pseudo-Arabic modeled on similar names of other chemical entities. [3] [4] George Starkey argued it came from the German word al-gehest (all spirit). [5] Johann Rudolph Glauber posed that it could have come from the words alhali est, the German word al gar heis, or Al zu hees, meaning "very hot". [5] Anglo-Dutch alchemist and physician William Yworth (Cleidophorus Mystagogus) (died 1715) argued for its root originating from High Dutch. [6] [5]

Other names

Jan Baptist van Helmont considered the alkahest to have never-ending reusability, calling it an "immortal". [7] He also used the term "maccabean fire" because of its similarities to the "thick water" in the deuterocanonical Book of Maccabees in the Old Testament. [7] Another name for the Alkahest termed by Helmont was ignis gehennae. [7] Other names include latex (or "clear water reduced to its minutest atoms"), and primum Ens Salum (or "salt exalted to its highest degree"). [7]

History

16th century

Paracelsus

Among its many philosophical and spiritual preoccupations, Hermeticism also concerned itself with panaceas—remedies supposed to cure all diseases and prolong life indefinitely. Later, an emergent Latin alchemy, associated with European humanism, transmuted itself into a new, more modern medical and pharmaceutical philosophy, reformed by a better understanding of human physiology. Philippus Paracelsus (1493–1541), who gave his name to the early modern school of medical theory known as Paracelcism, first made mention of the alkahest as a chemical which could fortify the liver, and—in instances where the liver failed—could act as a substitute for its functions. [2]

Recipe

The recipe for the theorized alkahest was often kept secret, as many alchemical recipes were. [5] There were many alchemists attempting to obtain the universal solvent, and thus many recipes, some later rejected by their creators, have been found. [8] Paracelsus's own recipe for alkahest was made of caustic lime, alcohol, and carbonate of potash; however, his recipe was not intended to be a "universal solvent". [9] [10]

17th century

Alkahest became very popular in the 17th and 18th centuries through Jan Baptist van Helmont. Its prevalence in the 17th and 18th centuries, despite its otherwise absurd and extreme qualities, was likely due to the popularity of alchemy at the time and the lack of an adequate alternative theory of chemistry. [9] During the 17th century, many alchemists were working on obtaining the alkahest, some of which were Johann Rudolf Glauber, George Starkey, Frederick Clod, Thomas Vaughan, Thomas Henshaw, Johann Brun, Robert Hamilton, Hugh Piatt, and Robert Child. [9] Those who followed and trained under Paracelsus did not think of the alkahest as van Helmont did, but slowly built upon the ideas posed by their teacher. [9]

Jan Baptist van Helmont

Alkahest as a universal solvent

Flemish chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont (1580–1644) expanded on the idea of the 'alkahest', believing it to be a universal solvent. [9] Helmont claimed that knowledge of the recipe was granted by God and was therefore known by few, and he had many dreams during which he believed he had been gifted the recipe, only to find them inadequate. [9] [5] Given the difficulty of obtaining alkahest, Helmont suggested the use of other, inferior substances believed to be capable of similar tasks. [8] Volatile salt of tartar, also known as pyrotartaric acid or glutaric acid, was considered both a substitute for alkahest and a component of alkahest. [8] [1] Helmont's writings also referred to a fourteenth century alchemical manuscript which discussed sal alkali (possibly caustic potash or lye) that was capable of dissolving many substances, and perhaps an ingredient in Helmont's alkahest. [9] [10] [11]

George Starkey

Colonial American alchemist George Starkey (1628–1665) described alkahest as a circulated salt that is neither acid nor alkali. [9] [12] Moreover, Starkey believed that, because acid saline liquors are destroyed by alkalies and urinous spirits, they cannot be ingredients of the immortal alkahest. [8] He believed instead that non-acidic substances could be ingredients of the alkahest, some of these suspected substances being urinous spirits, spirit of alkalies, and sulphureous vegetable spirits. [8] In particular, Starkey believed that alkahest's secret ingredient laid within urine. [9] [8]

Dissolving gold; removing sulphur from mercury; cure for urinary calculi

Starkey and his mentor Helmont (by their own report) used mercuric sulphide to dissolve gold, and informed Robert Boyle about it in a series of letters. The alkahest, according to Starkey, was able to remove sulphur from the natural mercury leaving a quicksilver resistant to corrosion. [8] Because of the supposed power of alkahest to break down substances into their occult qualities, it was sought after for its potential to cure incurable diseases at the time. [8] For example, the breaking down of Ludus could provide a cure for urinary calculi. [7]

Ladislaus Reti, a 20th-century historian of science, investigated alchemical recipes involving alkahest and found that no chemical was sufficient in breaking down the wide variety of materials Helmont supposed. Reti points out that in such recipes, an alcohol solution of potassium hydroxide could have been used instead. [5]

Johann Rudolf Glauber and nitric acid

German-Dutch alchemist and chemist Johann Rudolf Glauber (1604–1670) believed that the alkahest was a class of substances, rather than one, particular substance. [9] Glauber believed he had discovered alkahest after discovering that volatile niter (nitric acid) and fixed niter (potassium carbonate) were able to dissolve several substances. [8]

Frederick Clod

German "mystical chemist" Frederick Clod (or Clodius) (1625–after 1661) believed that mercury could convert salts into "ponderous liquor", which he believed was needed to make the alkahest. [8]

Robert Boyle – corpuscular nature of alkahest

The theory of alkahest was conceived in terms of alchemy, Helmontian theories, and the physical theory of corpuscularianism. [9] [13] According to Helmont and Anglo-Irish scientist Robert Boyle (1627–1691), the alkahest had a "microstructure", meaning it was composed of extremely small, homogeneous corpuscles. [9] [8] This structure allowed the alkahest's corpuscles to move between the corpuscles of all other materials and mechanically separate them without altering their base materials or itself, conforming with the idea that it was infinitely reuseable. [9] [8] It was these qualities which made the alkahest distinct from ordinary corrosives, which are altered by the substances they act upon and thus not infinitely reusable. [8]

Tobias Ludwig Kohlhans and Henry Oldenburg – alkahest in the lymphatic vessels

Tobias Ludwig Kohlhans (1624–1705) suggested in his dissertation of the spleen, that alkahest could be found in the liquid that had been discovered in the lymphatic vessels of animals. [7] In 1661, German-English scientist Henry Oldenburg (c. 1618–1677) made experimental connections between alkahest and this liquid. [7] Helmont, Oldenburg, and Goddard raised questions, however, about the lymph's "sweetly acidic" quality, the necessity of a hypothetical universal solvent to explain the acidity in empty animal lymphatic vessels, its ability to be generated within the body, and how it differed from other fluids or humours in the body. [7]

Johann Kunckel – the existence of alkahest is questioned

The German alchemist Johann Kunckel (1630–1703) and others at that time began to see the alkahest as merely fantasy and wishful thinking. [5] A potential problem involving alkahest—first posed by Kunckel—is that, if it dissolves everything, then it cannot be placed into a container because it would dissolve the container. [5] Starkey, however, specified that alkahest dissolved only composite materials into their constituent, elemental parts; [12] hence, a hypothetical container made of a pure element (say, lead) would not be dissolved by alkahest.

Herman Boerhaave – alkahest and the philosopher's stone

Paracelsus believed that alkahest was, in fact, the philosopher's stone. Dutch chemist and physician Herman Boerhaave (1668–1738), in his textbook Elementa Chymiae (1732), did not think alkahest was the philosopher's stone, but of greater importance and value than the stone. [7]

After the 18th century alkahest was taken less seriously over time.[ citation needed ]

Modern usages of the term

In modern times, water is sometimes called the universal solvent, because it can dissolve a large variety of substances; more than any other liquid. [14] This is due to its chemical polarity and amphoterism.[ citation needed ]

The old remark "spit is the universal solvent" satirizes the idea. [15]

Alkahest, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical subsidiary of Grifols which is developing products derived from blood plasma to reverse and inhibit aging. [16]

"Alkahestry" is the term used for a type of alchemy in the manga series Fullmetal Alchemist . [17]

Notes

  1. In modern times, water is sometimes called the universal solvent because it dissolves most substances but cannot significantly dissolve nonpolar substances such as oil, but in this case, the phrase "universal solvent" is meant to a greater extent.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alchemy</span> Branch of ancient protoscientific natural philosophy

Alchemy is an ancient branch of natural philosophy, a philosophical and protoscientific tradition that was historically practised in China, India, the Muslim world, and Europe. In its Western form, alchemy is first attested in a number of pseudepigraphical texts written in Greco-Roman Egypt during the first few centuries AD. Greek-speaking alchemists often referred to their craft as "the Art" (τέχνη) or "Knowledge" (ἐπιστήμη), and it was often characterised as mystic (μυστική), sacred (ἱɛρά), or divine (θɛíα).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosopher's stone</span> Legendary alchemical substance

The philosopher's stone is a mythic alchemical substance capable of turning base metals such as mercury into gold or silver; it was also known as "the tincture" and "the powder". Alchemists additionally believed that it could be used to make an elixir of life which made possible rejuvenation and immortality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jan Baptist van Helmont</span> Chemist and physician (1580–1644)

Jan Baptist van Helmont was a chemist, physiologist, and physician from Brussels. He worked during the years just after Paracelsus and the rise of iatrochemistry, and is sometimes considered to be "the founder of pneumatic chemistry". Van Helmont is remembered today largely for his 5-year willow tree experiment, his introduction of the word "gas" into the vocabulary of science, and his ideas on spontaneous generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andreas Libavius</span> German doctor and chemist (c. 1550–1616)

Andreas Libavius or Andrew Libavius was born in Halle, Germany c. 1550 and died in July 1616. Libavius was a renaissance man who spent time as a professor at the University of Jena teaching history and poetry. After which he became a physician at the Gymnasium in Rothenburg and later founded the Gymnasium at Coburg. Libavius was most known for practicing alchemy and writing a book called Alchemia, one of the first chemistry textbooks ever written.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johann Rudolf Glauber</span> German-Dutch alchemist (1604–1670)

Johann Rudolf Glauber was a German-Dutch alchemist and chemist. Some historians of science have described him as one of the first chemical engineers. His discovery of sodium sulfate in 1625 led to the compound being named after him: "Glauber's salt".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Azoth</span> Idealized substance in alchemy

Azoth is a universal remedy or potent solvent sought after in the realm of alchemy, akin to alkahest—a distinct alchemical substance. The quest for Azoth was the crux of numerous alchemical endeavors, symbolized by the Caduceus. Initially coined to denote an esoteric formula pursued by alchemists, akin to the Philosopher's Stone, the term Azoth later evolved into a poetic expression for the element mercury. The etymology of 'Azoth' traces to Medieval Latin as a modification of 'azoc,' ultimately derived from the Arabic al-za'buq (الزئبق), meaning 'the mercury.'

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese alchemy</span> Ancient Chinese approach to alchemy

Chinese alchemy is a historical Chinese approach to alchemy, a pseudoscience. According to original texts such as the Cantong qi, the body is understood as the focus of cosmological processes summarized in the five agents of change, or Wuxing, the observation and cultivation of which leads the practitioner into alignment and harmony with the Tao. Therefore, the traditional view in China is that alchemy focuses mainly on longevity and the purification of one's spirit, mind and body, providing, health, longevity and wisdom, through the practice of Qigong and wuxingheqidao. The consumption and use of various concoctions known as alchemical medicines or elixirs, each of which having different purposes but largely were concerned with immortality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johann von Löwenstern-Kunckel</span> German chemist (1630–1703)

Johann Kunckel, awarded Swedish nobility in 1693 under the Swedish name von Löwenstern-Kunckel and the German version of the name Kunckel von Löwenstern, German chemist, was born in 1630, near Rendsburg, his father being alchemist to the court of Holstein. He became chemist and apothecary to the dukes of Lauenburg, and then to the Elector of Saxony, Johann Georg II, who put him in charge of the royal laboratory at Dresden. Intrigues engineered against him caused him to resign this position in 1677, and for a time he lectured on chemistry at Annaberg and Wittenberg. Invited to Berlin by Frederick William, in 1679 he became director of the laboratory and glass works of Brandenburg. In 1688 the king of Sweden, Charles XI, brought him to Stockholm, ennobling him under the name von Löwenstern-Kunckel in 1693 and making him a member of the Bergskollegium, the Board of Mines. He died probably on 20 March 1703 near Stockholm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iatrochemistry</span> Early modern branch of medicine

Iatrochemistry is an archaic pre-scientific school of thought that was supplanted by modern chemistry and medicine. Having its roots in alchemy, iatrochemistry sought to provide chemical solutions to diseases and medical ailments.

<i>The Sceptical Chymist</i> 1661 book by Robert Boyle

The Sceptical Chymist: or Chymico-Physical Doubts & Paradoxes is the title of a book by Robert Boyle, published in London in 1661. In the form of a dialogue, the Sceptical Chymist presented Boyle's hypothesis that matter consisted of corpuscles and clusters of corpuscles in motion and that every phenomenon was the result of collisions of particles in motion. Boyle also objected to the definitions of elemental bodies propounded by Aristotle and by Paracelsus, instead defining elements as "perfectly unmingled bodies". For these reasons Robert Boyle has sometimes been called the founder of modern chemistry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical revolution</span> Reformulation of chemistry in the 17th and 18th centuries

In the history of chemistry, the chemical revolution, also called the first chemical revolution, was the reformulation of chemistry during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, which culminated in the law of conservation of mass and the oxygen theory of combustion.

Corpuscularianism, also known as corpuscularism, is a set of theories that explain natural transformations as a result of the interaction of particles. It differs from atomism in that corpuscles are usually endowed with a property of their own and are further divisible, while atoms are neither. Although often associated with the emergence of early modern mechanical philosophy, and especially with the names of Thomas Hobbes, René Descartes, Pierre Gassendi, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, and John Locke, corpuscularian theories can be found throughout the history of Western philosophy.

Principle, in chemistry, refers to a historical concept of the constituents of a substance, specifically those that produce a certain quality or effect in the substance, such as a bitter principle, which is any one of the numerous compounds having a bitter taste.

George Starkey (1628–1665) was a Colonial American alchemist, medical practitioner, and writer of numerous commentaries and chemical treatises that were widely circulated in Western Europe and influenced prominent men of science, including Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton. After relocating from New England to London, England, in 1650, Starkey began writing under the pseudonym Eirenaeus Philalethes. Starkey remained in England and continued his career in medicine and alchemy until his death in the Great Plague of London in 1665.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diana's Tree</span>

Diana's Tree, also known as the Philosopher's Tree, was considered a precursor to the philosopher's stone and resembled coral in regards to its structure. It is a dendritic amalgam of crystallized silver, obtained from mercury in a solution of silver nitrate; so-called by the alchemists, among whom "Diana" stood for silver. The arborescence of this amalgam, which even included fruit-like forms on its branches, led pre-modern chemical philosophers to theorize the existence of life in the kingdom of minerals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrochloric acid</span> Aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride

Hydrochloric acid, also known as muriatic acid or spirits of salt, is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride (HCl). It is a colorless solution with a distinctive pungent smell. It is classified as a strong acid. It is a component of the gastric acid in the digestive systems of most animal species, including humans. Hydrochloric acid is an important laboratory reagent and industrial chemical.

John Webster (1610–1682), also known as Johannes Hyphastes, was an English cleric, physician and chemist with occult interests, a proponent of astrology and a sceptic about witchcraft. He is known for controversial works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrence M. Principe</span>

Lawrence M. Principe is the Drew Professor of the Humanities at Johns Hopkins University in the Department of History of Science and Technology and the Department of Chemistry. He is also currently the Director of the Charles Singleton Center for the Study of Premodern Europe, an interdisciplinary center for research at Johns Hopkins. He is the first recipient of the Francis Bacon Medal for significant contributions to the history of science. Principe's research has been supported by the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Philosophical Society, the Chemical Heritage Foundation, and a 2015-2016 Guggenheim Fellowship. Principe is recognized as one of the foremost experts in the history of alchemy.

Robert Child (1613–1654) was an English physician, agriculturalist and alchemist. A recent view is that his approach to agriculture belongs to the early ideas on political economy.

References

  1. 1 2 Panzarasa, Guido (2015). "Rediscovering pyrotartaric acid: a chemical interpretation of the volatile salt of tartar" (PDF). Bulletin for the History of Chemistry. 40: 1–8 via IsisCB.
  2. 1 2 Paracelsus, Philippus Theophrastus (1572). Zwen Tractatus. I. De viribus membrorum spiritualium. II. De electro: Mit Erklärung ettlicher Wörter und Praeparationum. Jobin, Bernhard. p. 10.
  3. Brande, William Thomas; Cox, Sir George William (1875). Dictionary of Science, Literature & Art: Comprising the Definitions and Derivations of the Scientific Terms in General Use. Longmans, Green. p. 58.
  4. Blanc, Paul David (2016-11-15). Fake Silk: The Lethal History of Viscose Rayon. Yale University Press. p. 6. ISBN   978-0-300-22488-7.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana Maria; Ferraz, Marcia Helena Mendes; Rattansi, Piyo M. (2014). "Seventeenth-century 'treasure' found in royal society archives: The ludus helmontii and the stone disease". Notes & Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science. 68 (3): 227–243. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2014.0010. PMC   4123661 . PMID   25254277.
  6. Cleidophorus Mystagogus, Trifertes Sagani, or Immortal Dissolvent, being a brief ... discourse of the matter and manner of preparing the Liquor Alkahest of Helmont, the Great Hilech of Paracelsus, the Sal Circulatum Minus of Ludovicus de Comit: or our Fiery Spirit of the Four Elements (William Pearson for Thomas Ballard, London 1705), (Google).
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana Maria; Ferraz, Márcia Helena Mendes; Rattansi, Piyo M. (2010). "Lost Royal Society Documents on 'Alkahest' (Universal Solvent) Rediscovered". Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 64 (4): 435–456. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2010.0074. ISSN   0035-9149. JSTOR   25802129. S2CID   191467935.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Newman, William R.; Principe, Lawrence M. (2002). Alchemy Tried in the Fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the Fate of Helmontian Chymistry. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 138, 242–243, 249, 282, 286. ISBN   0-226-57711-2.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Porto, Paulo A. (2002). "" Summus atque felicissimus salium": the medical relevance of the liquor Alkahest". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 76 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1353/bhm.2002.0038. ISSN   1086-3176. PMID   11875242. S2CID   34821645.
  10. 1 2 Stratford, Jordan; Kupperman, Jeffrey S. (2014). A Dictionary of Western Alchemy. Wheaton, Illinois: Quest Books. pp. 7, 79. ISBN   978-0835608978.
  11. Leinhard, John. "No.1569 Alkahest". University of Houston. Retrieved 14 May 2014.
  12. 1 2 Philalethes, Eirenaeus. "The Secret of the Immortal Liquor Called Alkahest or Ignis-Aqua" . Retrieved 14 May 2014.
  13. Newman, William R. (1993). "The corpuscular theory of J.B. Van Helmont and its medieval sources". Vivarium. 31 (1): 161–191. doi:10.1163/156853493X00132. JSTOR   42569883.
  14. "Water, the Universal Solvent". Water Science School. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  15. Lienhard, John H. "Alkahest". The Engines of our Ingenuity. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  16. Abbott, Alison (1 November 2017). "Infusions of young blood tested in patients with dementia". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22930 . Retrieved 18 July 2022.
  17. Moodley, Vasalya (27 June 2022). "Fullmetal Alchemist: What is Alkahestry?". GameRant.