Alligator munensis

Last updated

Alligator munensis
Temporal range: late Middle Pleistocene (possibly Holocene)
Alligator munensis dorsal.png
Top view of Alligator munensis
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archosauromorpha
Clade: Archosauriformes
Order: Crocodilia
Family: Alligatoridae
Genus: Alligator
Species:
A. munensis
Binomial name
Alligator munensis
Darlim et al., 2023

Alligator munensis is an extinct species of alligator from the Quaternary of Thailand. After the skull of A. munensis was discovered, it was tentatively assigned to the Chinese alligator before being recognized as a distinct species. Although the two are still considered to be close relatives, the pronounced anatomical differences suggest that the two species split from one another long prior to the Pleistocene, possibly during the uplifting of the Tibetan Plateau during the Miocene. It had a short and robust skull and may have had globular back teeth possibly corresponding to a greater amount of hard-shelled prey items. The nostrils of A. munensis were positioned much further towards the back of the skull than in other alligators, but the function of this is unknown. [1]

Contents

History and naming

The only currently known skull of Alligator munensis, specimen DMR-BSL2011-2, was discovered in 2005 in a layer of Quaternary alluvium in the village of Ban Si Liam, northeastern Thailand. The specimen was first discussed in a brief report by Claude et al. in 2011, who tentatively referred the material to the extant Chinese alligator (Alligator sinensis), although they already noted the distinct shape of this specimen. As the skull was in need of additional preparation, a detailed description was not possible until 2023, when Darlim and colleagues published their research on the skull. Using CT-scan data, Darlim and colleagues were able to compare the Thailand skull to material confidently assigned to Alligator sinensis, concluding that the material is different enough to warrant being placed in its own species. Furthermore, the team concludes based on other fossils from the same excavation that the locality that yielded these fossils dates to at least the middle Pleistocene, greatly narrowing down the timeframe from what was initially suggested by Claude et al. (who proposed it ranging from the Miocene to Pleistocene).

The holotype of A. munensis in profile view Alligator munensis lateral.png
The holotype of A. munensis in profile view

The species name of Alligator munensis references the Mun river, which is located near the site where the fossil of this species was found. [1]

Description

The skull of Alligator munensis is broadly triangular as in other alligators, but shows a remarkable level of compression that greatly shortens the overall length of the head. Furthermore, the rostrum was not especially flattened and still rather deep around the level of the nostrils, a condition otherwise known as altirostry. The region around the nose is raised thanks to an upturn of the nasal bones, which subsequently creates a marked ditch just behind the nares when observing the skull in profile view. [1]

Although the external nares are used to identify A. munensis as a member of the genus Alligator (the nares are separated from one another by the nasal bones), they are still unique compared to all other species of Alligator. They only cover about a third the length of the premaxilla, not two thirds like in other species. The bar that splits the nares is a lot broader in A. munensis, whereas it is thin in other species. Furthermore, while this internarial bar is typically formed mostly by the nasals, the premaxilla contribute heavily in the species from Thailand. The greater contribution of the premaxilla also extends to the back of the nares, where the bone wraps around and participates in the posterior border of these openings. The entire internarial bar is very high and partially separates the nasal cavity. Finally, the subcircular (rather than teardrop-shaped) nares are located much further back than in any other species of Alligator. [1]

The choana is also unique relative to all other species of the genus. It is almost circular with a sudden constriction towards the back, rather than elliptical, and it lacks the raised rim around the back of the opening. [1]

A Chinese alligator showing its spectacles Chinese Alligator 2016.jpg
A Chinese alligator showing its spectacles

Several distinct ridges ornament the skull of Alligator munensis. One rostral ridge for example stretches across the maxilla and lacrimal bone, where it transitions to a further pair of ridges that span the prefrontal bones. This later pair of ridges, which is seen in all species except for A. mcgrewi, forms a structure referred to as spectacle. Additional ridges can be seen following the midlines of the nasals, the frontal bone and the parietal bone. Notably, the squamosals lack any distinct ridges or crests and are instead flat, whereas in today's Chinese alligator these bones are raised to form low horns. [1]

Alligator munensis had comparably reduced dentition. In addition to the typical five teeth in each premaxilla, it only possessed 12 teeth in either maxilla. Chinese alligators meanwhile possess 14 maxillary teeth. No teeth are known, but the 9th to 11th alveoli of the maxillae are clearly enlarged, which may correlate with the globular or blunt teeth. This could indicate a return to a more ancestral dentition, as today's generalist alligators evolved from more specialised ancestors. [1]

Phylogeny and evolution

The type description of A. munensis does not include a detailed phylogenetic tree, although the authors mention that such an analysis is in the works. Regardless of the absence of a phylogeny, Darlim et al. are confident in assigning this species to the genus Alligator based on a number of shared traits. Within Alligator, A. munensis shows many similarities to Alligator sinensis, suggesting the two were closely related. Nevertheless, the many derived features of this species indicate that the relationship between the two was not that of ancestor and descendant, but rather that they may have been divergent species. [1]

While it is not entirely clear when the two species diverged from one another, as the Alligator fossil record of Asia is only poorly studied, Darlim and colleagues have speculated on their origin. They propose that the ancestor of A. sinensis and A. munensis could have inhabited the lowlands that housed the proto Yangtze-Xi and Mekong-Chao Phraya river systems. When continued continental drift pushed up the eastern Tibetan Plateau during the Miocene, the two river systems would have been separated from one another, which consequently prevented the two resulting populations from interbreeding or dispersing into the others range. This would have caused both A. sinensis and A. munensis to evolve in isolation from one another, with the later being restricted to the proto-Chao Phraya river and later Mekong river system. [1]

Paleobiology

Reconstruction of Alligator munensis by Marton Szabo Alligator munensis reconstruction.png
Reconstruction of Alligator munensis by Márton Szabó

Based on the deposits that Alligator munensis was found in, it may have inhabited similar environments as Chinese alligators, which includes lowlands and floodplains with a variety of waterbodies, including marshes, ponds and streams. A number of other animals were found in the same deposits as A. munensis, including softshell turtles and large mammals, specifically water buffalos and sambar deer. [1]

The enlarged posterior maxillary tooth sockets may suggest that the back teeth of A. munensis were either globular or blunt with flattened sides, which is seen in several short-snouted alligatoroids. This, coupled with the overall robust build of the skull and well developed attachment sites for jaw musculature, suggests that Alligator munensis had a strong bite suited to crush prey. Such a lifestyle has appeared in Crocodilia on numerous occasions, but also happens to be the ancestral state for alligatorines, meaning that today's generalist alligators came from more specialised ancestry. However, this does not necessarily indicate that A. munensis was more specialised as well, as the appearance of crushing dentition may connect to an even greater degree of opportunism, possibly in response to seasonally available hard-shelled prey. Darlim and colleagues point towards the omnivorous big-headed turtle, which will consume greater quantities of molluscs during certain periods of the year. Broad-snouted caimans on the other hand favor hard-shelled prey, yet lack the enlarged posterior teeth of other durophages. Chinese alligators also lack this particular adaptation, but their ecology is generally poorly understood. [1]

The function of the restracted nares of Alligator munensis is unknown, although similar conditions are seen in other animals. Similar adaptations for instance are seen in a number of secondarily marine animals like whales, ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mesosaurs and the Jurassic metriorhynchoids, distant cousins of crocodilians. However, marine habits are dismissed not only due to the locality where A. munensis was found, but also due to the fact that no alligators are known to have possessed salt glands, rendering indefinite habitation of saltwater impossible. Among crown crocodilians, retracted nares are also seen in Purussaurus and, to a lesser degree, Siamese crocodiles as well as Crocodylus thorbjarnarsoni . [1]

Related Research Articles

<i>Baru</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Baru, sometimes referred to as the cleaver-headed crocodile, is an extinct genus of Australian mekosuchine crocodilian. Its fossils have been found from various Late Oligocene and Miocene localities from across the Northern Territory and Queensland, indicating that Baru was a common species during the late Paleogene and early Neogene. Three species are recognized, B. darrowi, B. iylwenpeny, and B. wickeni.

<i>Mekosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Mekosuchus is a genus of extinct Australasian mekosuchine crocodilian. Species of Mekosuchus were generally small-sized, terrestrial animals with short, blunt-snouted heads and strong limbs. Four species are currently recognized, M. inexpectatus, M. whitehunterensis, M. sanderi and M. kalpokasi, all known primarily from fragmentary remains.

<i>Caulkicephalus</i> Genus of anhanguerid pterosaur from the Early Cretaceous

Caulkicephalus is a genus of anhanguerid pterosaur from the Isle of Wight off the coast of England. It lived during the Early Cretaceous period, about 130 million years ago.

<i>Nicrosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Nicrosaurus (/nɪkroʊˈsɔrəs/) is an extinct genus of phytosaur reptile existing during the Late Triassic period. Although it looked like a crocodile, it was not closely related to these creatures, instead being an example of parallel evolution. The main difference between Nicrosaurus and modern crocodiles is the position of the nostrils – Nicrosaurus's nostrils, or external nares, were placed directly in front of the forehead, whereas in crocodiles, the nostrils are positioned on the end of the snout. A 2013 study has also found that ilium of Nicrosaurus is quite distinctive from all other phytosaurs.

<i>Paludirex</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Paludirex is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodylian from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Australia. A large and robust semi-aquatic ambush hunter capable of attaining lengths of up to 5 m (16 ft), it was likely the top predator of Australia's waterways prior to the appearance of modern saltwater crocodiles. Two species are known, the smaller Paludirex gracilis and the larger Paludirex vincenti. A third as of yet unnamed species may have also existed.

<i>Arambourgisuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Arambourgisuchus is an extinct genus of dyrosaurid crocodylomorph from the late Palaeocene of Morocco, found in the region of Sidi Chenane in 2000, following collaboration by French and Moroccan institutions, and described in 2005 by a team led by palaeontologist Stéphane Jouve. Arambourgisuchus was a large animal with an elongated skull 1 meter in length.

<i>Harpacochampsa</i> Extinct genus of crocodilian

Harpacochampsa is a poorly known Early Miocene crocodilian from the Bullock Creek lagerstätte of the Northern Territory, Australia. The current specimen consists of a partial skull and fragments of a long, slender snout reminiscent of that of a false gharial, demonstrating that it was a piscivore in life.

<i>Euthecodon</i> Extinct genus of crocodilian

Euthecodon is an extinct genus of long-snouted crocodile. It was common throughout much of Africa during the Neogene, with fossils being especially common in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Libya. Although superficially resembling that of gharials, the long snout was a trait developed independently from that of other crocodilians and suggests a diet of primarily fish. Euthecodon coexisted with a wide range of other crocodiles in the areas it inhabited before eventually going extinct during the Pleistocene.

<i>Rhadinosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Rhadinosuchus is an extinct genus of proterochampsian archosauriform reptile from the Late Triassic. It is known only from the type species Rhadinosuchus gracilis, reposited in Munich, Germany. The fossil includes an incomplete skull and fragments of post-cranial material. Hosffstetter (1955), Kuhn (1966), Reig (1970) and Bonaparte (1971) hypothesized it to be synonymous with Cerritosaurus, but other characteristics suggest it is closer to Chanaresuchus and Gualosuchus, while it is certainly different from Proterochampsa and Barberenachampsa. The small size indicates it is a young animal, making it hard to classify.

<i>Crocodylus checchiai</i> Extinct species of reptile

Crocodylus checchiai is an extinct species of crocodile from the Miocene to Pliocene of Libya and Kenya. C. checchiai was named in 1947 based on a skull from the Sahabi Formation. Remains from the lower Nawata Formation in the Turkana Basin of Kenya that were first attributed to the Nile crocodile have now been reassigned to C. checchiai, extending its geographic range. The morphology of the species, in particular the pronounced rostral boss, indicates that it may be the connecting link between African and American species of the genus Crocodylus.

<i>Palatodonta</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Palatodonta is an extinct genus of neodiapsid reptile known from the early Middle Triassic of the Netherlands. It was initially described in 2013 as a basal placodontiform closely related to a group of marine reptiles called placodonts, characterized by their crushing teeth and shell-like body armor. Under this interpretation, Palatodonta is transitional between placodonts and less specialized reptiles. Like placodonts, it has a row of large teeth on its palate, but while these teeth are thick and blunt in placodonts, Palatodonta has palatal teeth that are thin and pointed. A 2023 study instead classified it as a sauropterygomorph and the sister taxon to Eusaurosphargis. In other words, it is close to, but not within, Sauropterygia.

<i>Anthracosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Anthracosuchus is an extinct genus of dyrosaurid crocodyliform from the Paleocene of Colombia. Remains of Anthracosuchus balrogus, the only known species, come from the Cerrejón Formation in the Cerrejón mine, and include four fossil specimens with partial skulls. Anthracosuchus differs from other dyrosaurids in having an extremely short (brevirostrine) snout, widely spaced eye sockets with bony protuberances around them, and osteoderms that are smooth and thick. It is one of the most basal dyrosaurids along with Chenanisuchus and Cerrejonisuchus.

<i>Caiman wannlangstoni</i> Extinct species of reptile

Caiman wannlangstoni is an extinct species of caiman that lived in what is now the Amazon Basin and surrounding areas during the Middle and Late Miocene. Fossils of C. wannlangstoni have been found in the Pebas Formation near Iquitos in Peru and include partial skulls and isolated skull bones. Other fossils were uncovered from the Urumaco Formation in Venezuela and the Laventan Honda Group of Colombia. The species was first described in 2015. Features that in combination distinguish C. wannlangstoni from other caimans include a deep snout, a wavy upper jaw margin, a large and upward-directed narial opening, and blunt teeth at the back of the jaws. Based on the sizes of the skulls, its estimated body length is about 211 to 227 centimetres.

<i>Ankylorhiza</i> Extinct genus of toothed whales from the Oligocene epoch

Ankylorhiza is an extinct genus of toothed whale that lived in what is now the United States during the Oligocene epoch, between 29 and 23.5 million years ago. The type and only known species is A. tiedemani, though two fossil skeletons may represent an additional, second species within the genus. Ankylorhiza was about 4.8 meters (16 ft) long, with a long, robust skull bearing conical teeth that were angled forwards at the tip of the snout.

Alligator hailensis, or Haile alligator, is a large, extinct species of Alligator known from the early Pleistocene of Florida. It is named after the town of Haile, Florida, where it was found. Its age and skeletal morphology is intermediate between the geologically older Alligator mefferdi and the modern American alligator, making it a transitional fossil.

<i>Caninemys</i> Extinct genus of turtles

Caninemys is an extinct genus of large freshwater side-necked turtle, belonging to the family Podocnemididae. Its fossils have been found in Brazil and Colombia, in rocks dating back from the middle to late Miocene.

<i>Kyhytysuka</i> Extinct marine reptile

Kyhytysuka is an extinct genus of ophthalmosaurian ichthyosaur from Early Cretaceous Colombia. The animal was previously assigned to the genus Platypterygius, but given its own genus in 2021. Kyhytysuka was a mid-sized ophthalmosaurian with heterodont dentition and several adaptations suggesting that it was a macropredatory vertebrate hunter living in shallow waters. It contains a single species, Kyhytysuka sachicarum.

<i>Kosmodraco</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Kosmodraco is a genus of large bodied choristodere from the Paleocene of North America. Originally described as a species of Simoedosaurus, it was found to represent a distinct genus in 2022. Multiple fossil skulls show a relatively short and robust snout and a skull that is considerably wider behind the eyes. Two species are currently recognized, K. dakotensis and K. magnicornis.

<i>Kinyang</i> (genus) Extinct genus of reptiles

Kinyang is an extinct genus of osteolaemine crocodile from the Early to Middle Miocene of Kenya. Two species are currently known, K. mabokoensis from the Lake Victoria basin and K. tchernovi from the Lake Victoria and Lake Turkana basin. Kinyang had an exceptionally broad and robust skull, much wider than that of any living crocodile species. This might have allowed it to attack and kill prey its own size or even bigger. Kinyang is notably larger than its contemporary relative Brochuchus. While the precise reasons for the extinction of Kinyang are not known, it coincides with a larger faunal turnover that saw osteolaemines replaced by the still dominant crocodylines. One reason for this shift may have been the drying climate of Africa at the time, which caused rainforests to be replaced by more open environments and disrupted the nesting behavior of osteolaemines due to their dependence on foliage.

Varanosuchus is an extinct genus of atoposaurid neosuchian from the Early Cretaceous Sao Khua Formation of Thailand. Varanosuchus is known from three individuals which preserve assorted postcranial material and a complete skull. The skull of Varanosuchus was altirostral, meaning it wasn't flattened like in modern crocodilians and instead much deeper, while the limbs were slender and straight, leading to it somewhat resembling a monitor lizard. Little is known about the ecology of atoposaurids, however, based on the slender, erect limbs, the altirostral skull and the well ornamented osteoderms it has been suggested that Varanosuchus was a terrestrial animal with some semi-aquatic affinities. Only a single species is recognized, Varanosuchus sakonnakhonensis.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Darlim, G.; Suraprasit, K.; Chaimanee, Y.; Tian, P.; Yamee, C.; Rugbumrung, M.; Kaweera, A.; Rabi, M. (2023). "An extinct deep-snouted Alligator species from the Quaternary of Thailand and comments on the evolution of crushing dentition in alligatorids". Sci Rep. 13 (10406). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36559-6. PMC   10344928 .