Quinkana

Last updated

Quinkana
Temporal range: Late Oligocene - Late Pleistocene, 28.1–0.01  Ma [1]
Quinkana timara skull.jpg
Restoration of the skull of Q. timara at the Central Australian Museum
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Archosauromorpha
Clade: Archosauriformes
Order: Crocodilia
Clade: Mekosuchinae
Genus: Quinkana
Molnar, 1981
Species
  • Quinkana fortirostrumMolnar, 1981 (type)
  • Quinkana timaraMegirian, 1994
  • Quinkana babarraWillis & Mackness, 1996
  • Quinkana meboldiWillis, 1997

Quinkana is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodylians that lived in Australia from about 28 million to about 10,000 years ago. [1] Most attributed specimens have been found in Queensland. It is speculated to have been one of the top predators of Pleistocene Australia.

Contents

The genus and type species, Q. fortirostrum was named by paleontologist Ralph E. Molnar in 1981. [2] Other species in the genus are Q. timara (1994), Q. babarra (1996), and Q. meboldi (1997). [2] [3] [4] [5] The name Quinkana comes from the "Quinkans", a legendary folk spirit from Gugu-Yalanji mythology. [2]

Quinkana is thought to possess long legs and had ziphodont teeth (lateromedially compressed, recurved, and serrated). [2] The genus is distinguishable by the combination of these ziphodont teeth and a broad snout. It also has a unique alveolar (tooth socket) structure and a short anterior palatine process (upper mouth bone). Quinkana was estimated to be around 3 m (10 ft) in length and to weigh around 200 kg (440 lb), with unnamed Pliocene remains possibly reaching 6 m (20 ft) in length. [6] [7] However, these estimates are based on fragmentary specimens and dimensions of related genera as there have been no complete Quinkana specimens found. [8]

Quinkana was originally attributed to family Crocodylidae in 1981 without a further classification because of its unique physical characteristics. [2] Some of its particular morphological traits shared by other Australian crocodile genera were entirely unique (primarily dentary and snout formations) which led to the creation of the subfamily Mekosuchinae in 1993 to accommodate it. [9]

The genus has been argued amongst paleontologists to be entirely terrestrial or semi-aquatic with no definitive consensus. Academic analysis cites comparative morphologies as indicators of Quinkana’s habitation to be terrestrial, but others argue that most specimens were discovered near known sources of water. [2] [10] An ongoing debate also persists about its dominance as a Pleistocene predator based upon the proportional quantity of predacious reptilian discoveries compared to predacious mammalian predators. The opposing side questions its predominance through findings that it coexisted with several other predators and prey. [5] [10] [11]

Species

The species within Quinkana include: the type species Q. fortirostrum from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Queensland, [8] Q. babarra from the Early Pliocene of Queensland, [12] Q. timara from the Middle Miocene of the Northern Territory, and Q. meboldi from the Late Oligocene of Queensland. There also remains a number of unattributed specimens.

Quinkana fortirostrum

Q. fortirostrum was discovered in the Chillagoe caves of Northern Queensland in 1970 by Lyndsey Hawkins, a member of the Sydney University Speleological Society. The partial skull was described as of "unusual form" (Australian Museum F.57844). [13] It was notable because of its higher snout orientation compared to extant crocodiles and the alveoli suggestion of ziphodont or laterally compressed teeth. The combination of these characteristics had previously not been found in Australia. Preliminary comparisons were made with sebecosuchians, pristichampsines, and modern crocodylids. Using this specimen, Ralph Molnar described Quinkana as a genus in 1981. [2] Its generic name was derived from Quinkan, which is a term for “spirit” from the Northern Queensland aboriginal Gugu-Yalanji people. Quinkans were represented by crocodiles in at least one instance at a southeastern Cape York rock painting location. Molnar also created the type species Q. fortirostrum, which was based on the Latin words fortis and rostrum meaning strong and beak (in reference to the species' snout).

The new genus was rationalised because of its distinctive maxilla (upper jawbone) and the proportions of its snout. [13] Preliminary comparisons were made with sebecosuchians, pristichampsines, and modern crocodylids. [14] The definition of Q. fortirostrum compared the maxilla to crocodilians and determined that the specimen exhibited substantial palatine (upper mouth bone) and alveoli (tooth sockets) differences to be considered a new genus. [13] The palatine exhibited a shorter jugal (cheek) and deeper infraorbital bar (bone between eye socket and palate) than what was common in crocodiles. The alveoli were found to be elongated which indicated that Q. fortirostrum had ziphodont or laterally compressed teeth, which differs from the interlocking teeth of Crocodylidae . The speciation was supported with multiple Pleistocene examples of maxilla and teeth found throughout Queensland and northern New South Wales. [13]

Quinkana timara

A second species named Quinkana timara was described by paleontologist Dirk Megirian in 1994. [3] The holotype (NTM P895-19 from the Northern Territory Museum) consisted of premaxilla (foremost upper jawbone), maxilla, and jugal fragments within limestone found in the Bullock Creek Locality in the Northern Territory. Additional referred specimens of maxilla fragments and teeth were found at the same site and were all determined to be from the middle to late Miocene. [15] The collected specimens were compared with Q. fortirostrum and Pristichampsus species. Q. timara was attributed to Quinkana because it shared the same ziphodont teeth orientation and snout formation as Q. fortirostrum. [3] The species was defined as having a “narrower snout” and “proportionally larger antorbital shelf [opening in the skull]” than Q. fortirostrum. This distinction is reflected in the name timara, which are thin Quinkans or “spirits" in Gugu-Yalanji mythology. [3]

Quinkana babarra

The third species, Quinkana babarra, was named in 1996 by researcher Brian Mackness and paleontologist Paul M.A. Willis. The holotype (QM F23220 from the Queensland Museum) was a maxilla fragment uncovered in 1991 by Mackness at the Dick’s Mother Lode Quarry in the Charters Towers Region northeast Queensland. [4] Other referred specimens including teeth were found in the same location and were estimated to be early Pliocene in age. [16] Q. babarra was determined to have an abbreviated and wider shout compared to Q. foritrostrum and Q. timara. [4] The new species also had a significant crest along its maxilla and premaxilla which was minimal in Q. timara and not present in Q. fortirostrum. The name is derived from the Gugu-Yalanji word babarr meaning “older sister” in reference to Q. fortirostrum. [4]

Quinkana meboldi

Three maxilla, two left (QM F31056 and QM F31057) and one right (QM F31058), and a partial dental specimen (QM F31059) were discovered by Willis in 1996. [5] The specimens were found at the White Hunter Site in Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland which is a late Oligocene deposit. The species has a narrower snout than Q. fortirostrum and a low alveolar ridge. Q. meboldi is also thought to be smaller than other species at an estimated length of 1.5 m (4 ft 11 in). [6] The species was named in 1997 for Ulrich Mebold, a German astronomer. [5]

Unattributed Quinkana sp. tooth Quinkana tooth.jpg
Unattributed Quinkana sp. tooth
Unattributed specimens

The speciation of Q. fortirostrum mentions a specimen consisting of a partial maxilla including two teeth (QM F10771) found at the Glen Garland Station in Yarraden, northwestern Queensland. [2] Although it exhibited alveolar similarities with Quinkana, the maxilla was determined to be divergent from Q. fortirostrum and was therefore not attributed to the species. QM F10771 was later found to be similar to Q. barbarra in alveoli formation, but the palate of the specimen was too incomplete and it was recommended to remain unattributed. [4]

A late Pleistocene tooth (QM F57032) was found in 2013 in the Kings Creek site of southeastern Queensland and attributed to Quinkana. It was most similar to fragmentary teeth from Q. foritrostrum, but was not attributed to any species because of a lack of complete specimens. [11]

A metatarsal bone (QM F30566) was found in 1992 in the Bluff Downs Fossil Site near Allingham in north Queensland. It was thought to be Pliocene in age and was compared against Q. barbarra. It represents a rare limb element which could be from Quinkana, although no determination has been made of its species or genus. [10]

Description

Most specimens of Quinkana were small in size, about 3 m (10 ft), though, a fragmentary, Pliocene-aged specimen is estimated to have reached up to 6 m (20 ft) in length, making it at the time one of Australia's largest predators, second only to the giant monitor lizard, Megalania . [7] One study argues that some species may have grown to 9 m (30 ft), but this has been criticised for exaggeration despite having some academic support and being widely cited. [10] [6] It has been speculated to weigh around 200 kg (440 lb), although this estimate has also been criticised for being too large in comparison to related genera, extant crocodiles, and proportions of Quinkana skull specimens. The estimate is furthermore questioned because of a lack of complete Quinkana specimens. [11] [6]

The genus is the only known mekosuchinae with both a broad snout and ziphodont teeth. [5] It can be distinguished primarily by its uniquely elongated and oriented alveoli (tooth sockets) combined with a wide but short snout and a short anterior palatine process (upper mouth bone). [4] Quinkana also have a U-shaped snout with a distinct maxillary recess. [4] Most species also share a similar pattern of crests along their snout, with dimensions varying by species. [3] Quinkana has teeth which have serrations on some crowns but not on others. All of its teeth are mildly recurved similarly to extant crocodilians. [4]

Taxonomy

Quinkana is a genus within the subfamily Mekosuchinae. Other genera included in this family are Australosuchus , Baru , Kambara , Mekosuchus , Paludirex , and Trilophosuchus .

The type species Q. fortirostrum was originally classified under Crocodylidae in 1981 through comparison against other Crocodilia genera Pristichampsus , Paleosuchus , and Osteolaemus and against Sebecosuchia genus Sebecus . [2] The most similarities were found with Pristichampsus and it was determined that the genus should fall under Crocodilia. However, its ziphodont teeth and broad snout made it an outlier in the order as no other genera shared those features. These discrepancies led to the attribution of Q. fortirostrum to Crocodylidae with the acknowledgement of this potential ambiguity. [2]

The subfamily Mekosuchinae was proposed in 1993 by Molnar, Willis, and Professor John Scanlon to accurately define a growing number of Australian crocodilian genera. [9] It was designed to accommodate Quinkana and other genera which demonstrated unique dentary characteristics and were native to Australasia during the Tertiary or Quaternary period. Quinkana remains an outlier because it is the only ziphodont genus within the subfamily. [4] The Mekosuchinae classification was contrasted in the 1994 speciation of Q. timara suggesting that further research into the phylogeny of Pristichampsus and Quinkana was necessary because of significant “structural similarities” in the snout when compared to other Crocodylidae. [3] However, this has not altered the accepted classification and Mekosuchinae is the dominant phylogenic subfamily used in academic or research contexts. [11]

Mekosuchinae

Australosuchus clarkae

Harpacochampsa camfieldensis

Trilophosuchus rackhami

Volia athollandersoni

Baru

B. darrowi

B. huberi

B. wickeni

Kambara

K. implexidens

K. molnari

K. murgonensis

K. taraina

Mekosuchus

M. inexpectatus

M. kolpokasi

M. sanderi

M. whitehunterensis

Pallimnarchus

P. gracilis

P. pollens

Quinkana

Q. fortirostrum

Q. timara

Q. barbarra

Q. meboldi

A 2018 tip dating study by Lee & Yates simultaneously using morphological, molecular (DNA sequencing), and stratigraphic (fossil age) data established the inter-relationships within Crocodylia. [17] The cladogram below shows the placement of Quinkana within Mekosuchinae: [17]

Crocodylia

Alligatoroidea Alligator white background.jpg

Prodiplocynodon

Asiatosuchus

"Crocodylus" affinis

"Crocodylus" depressifrons

"Crocodylus" acer

Brachyuranochampsa

Mekosuchinae

Australosuchus

Kambara taraina

Kambara implexidens

Kambara murgonensis

Kalthifrons

Pallimnarchus

Baru wickeni

Baru darrowi

Baru Alcoota

Bullock Creek taxon

Baru huberi

Volia

Mekosuchus

Trilophosuchus

Quinkana

Longirostres
Crocodyloidea

"Crocodylus" megarhinus

Crocodylidae Siamese Crocodile white background.jpg

Gavialoidea

extinct basal Gavialoids

Gavialidae

Gavialis Gavialis gangeticus (Gharial, Gavial) white background.jpg

Tomistoma Tomistoma schlegelii. white background.JPG

Paleobiology

Quinkana was originally thought to be entirely terrestrial because many of the specimens had been found in caves and because other ziphodonts were known to be land-dwelling. [2] Early analysis also discussed morphologic traits such as "hooflike unguals" and a rounder as opposed to flattened tail as indications of its terrestrial habitation. [2] However, modern interpretations argued that it was semi-aquatic because all attributed specimens have been discovered in dig sites which were known to have been near bodies of water. [10] [6] The issue remains contested due to a lack of evidence.

Australia Queensland location map blank.svg
Red pog.svg
Red pog.svg
Red pog.svg
Red pog.svg
Red pog.svg
Red pog.svg
Locations of Quinkana sp. fossils found in Queensland

It has been suggested that Quinkana’s ziphodont teeth indicated, “predation upon larger prey than is usual for crocodiles”. [2] Studies have also speculated that the genus’ ziphodont teeth indicate that it was a cursorial hunter as opposed to the ambush techniques utilised by extant crocodilians. [18] This finding is also correlated with analysis of the pectoral and pelvic girdles of other Mekosuchines which are theorised to be representative of Quinkana’s anatomy, as no complete specimens have been found. [18] [5]

It was proposed in 1981 that the species may have been a dominant predator because there were no other known terrestrial hunters in the Tertiary and Pleistocene periods. [2] Modern analysis has furthermore suggested that there was a "taxonomic-ecological shift" in Australia after the Miocene, and beginning as early as the Pliocene, as the proportion of large predators shifted from mammalian to reptilian. [11] This theory of dominant reptilian predators including Quinkana and Megalania during the Tertiary and Pleistocene is supported by some academics, although others argue that these genera were not actively predacious because there is evidence that many reptilians and mammals coexisted. [4] One study found Quinkana teeth in a Pleistocene river deposit in South Walker Creek in Western Queensland amidst thirteen extinct and three extant genera, evenly split between carnivorous and herbivorous genera, with three genera of crocodilians, and suggested that this demonstrates a high level of coexistence. [19]

Analysis has also suggested that there may be possibilities for two or more predacious crocodilians to coexist in a singular habitat with the provision that they have distinct head shapes. [5] [19] In theory, this is thought to be because the distinct snout morphologies indicate different types of hunting and use of habitats. This has been derived from modern analysis of extant species, but has generally correlated with other discoveries of overlapping carnivorous crocodilian deposits. [19] One possible attributable Quinkana specimen presented evidence of a traumatic bite injury which would have occurred due to interspecies aggression. A study concluded that this was likely due to intraspecies aggression, but that it could also have been due to interspecies conflict. [10]

The causes for the species’ extinction in southeastern Queensland is considered to be environmental. With the presumption of Quinkana as a semi-aquatic predator, it has been suggested that the deterioration of river habitats in Queensland since the Middle Pleistocene led to its extinction. [11] [19] This is due to changes occurring from the last glacial cycle which created more open grasslands and resulted in more droughts, which locally explains the extinction of water dependent species such as Quinkana. [11] Studies have also suggested that extant crocodilians managed to survive by moving to coastal habitats, while Quinkana did not. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mekosuchinae</span> Extinct subfamily of reptiles

Mekosuchinae is an extinct clade of crocodilians from the Cenozoic of Australasia. They represented the dominant group of crocodilians in the region during most of the Cenozoic. They first appear in the fossil record in the Eocene in Australia, and survived until the arrival of humans: in the Late Pleistocene in Australia and within the Holocene in the Pacific islands of Fiji, New Caledonia and Vanuatu.

<i>Baru</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Baru, sometimes referred to as the cleaver-headed crocodile, is an extinct genus of Australian mekosuchine crocodilian. Its fossils have been found from various Late Oligocene and Miocene localities from across the Northern Territory and Queensland, indicating that Baru was a common species during the late Paleogene and early Neogene. Three species are recognized, B. darrowi, B. iylwenpeny, and B. wickeni.

<i>Mekosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Mekosuchus is a genus of extinct Australasian mekosuchine crocodilian. Species of Mekosuchus were generally small-sized, terrestrial animals with short, blunt-snouted heads and strong limbs. Four species are currently recognized, M. inexpectatus, M. whitehunterensis, M. sanderi and M. kalpokasi, all known primarily from fragmentary remains.

<i>Trilophosuchus</i> Genus of crocodiles

Trilophosuchus is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodilian from Australia. Its fossils have been found at the Ringtail Site in the Riversleigh World Heritage Area and date to the Miocene epoch. Additional remains have also been found at the older Hiatus Site and extend its range into the Oligocene. Like the closely related Mekosuchus, it is thought to have had a short and blunt snout and large eyes that generally resembles today's dwarf crocodiles. It also shares similarities with several much older crocodylomorph groups and is commonly thought to have been more terrestrial than any crocodilian living today. Only a single species has been described, the type species T. rackhami.

<i>Australosuchus</i> Genus of reptiles

Australosuchus is an extinct monospecific genus of crocodylian belonging to the subfamily Mekosuchinae. The type and only known species Australosuchus clarkae lived during the Late Oligocene and the Early Miocene in the Lake Eyre Basin of South Australia. It was described in 1991 by Paul Willis and Ralph Molnar from fossil material discovered at Lake Palankarinna.

<i>Paludirex</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Paludirex is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodylian from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Australia. A large and robust semi-aquatic ambush hunter capable of attaining lengths of up to 5 m (16 ft), it was likely the top predator of Australia's waterways prior to the appearance of modern saltwater crocodiles. Two species are known, the smaller Paludirex gracilis and the larger Paludirex vincenti. A third as of yet unnamed species may have also existed.

<i>Kambara</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Kambara is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodylian that lived during the Eocene epoch in Australia. It is generally thought to have been a semi-aquatic generalist, living a lifestyle similar to many of today's crocodiles. Four species are currently recognised, the sympatric Kambara murgonensis and Kambara implexidens from sediments near Murgon, the poorly preserved Kambara molnari from the Rundle Formation and the youngest of the four, Kambara taraina, also from the Rundle Formation. Kambara were medium-sized crocodilians, with mature specimens generally reaching lengths from 3–4 m (9.8–13.1 ft).

<i>Iberosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Iberosuchus is a genus of extinct sebecosuchian mesoeucrocodylian found in Western Europe from the Eocene. Remains from Portugal was described in 1975 by Antunes as a sebecosuchian crocodilian. This genus has one species: I. macrodon. Iberosuchus was a carnivore, unlike the crocodilians today, they are not aquatic and are instead terrestrial.

<i>Volia</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Volia is an extinct monospecific genus of mekosuchine crocodylian closely related to Mekosuchus and Trilophosuchus. Volia is known from a collection of largely fragmentary remains including skull bones and limbs recovered from the Voli Voli and Wainibuku Caves on Viti Levu (Fiji), with similar remains having been found on Naigani. It was around 2–3 metres (7–10 ft) long, making it the largest predatory animal on the island and subsequently most likely the apex predator of the Pleistocene ecosystems of Fiji. It may have fed on giant iguanas, flightless birds or even fish. Like its closest relatives, it may have been more terrestrial than today's crocodiles.

<i>Harpacochampsa</i> Extinct genus of crocodilian

Harpacochampsa is a poorly known Early Miocene crocodilian from the Bullock Creek lagerstätte of the Northern Territory, Australia. The current specimen consists of a partial skull and fragments of a long, slender snout reminiscent of that of a false gharial, demonstrating that it was a piscivore in life.

<i>Asiatosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Asiatosuchus is an extinct genus of crocodyloid crocodilians that lived in Eurasia during the Paleogene. Many Paleogene crocodilians from Europe and Asia have been attributed to Asiatosuchus since the genus was named in 1940. These species have a generalized crocodilian morphology typified by flat, triangular skulls. The feature that traditionally united these species under the genus Asiatosuchus is a broad connection or symphysis between the two halves of the lower jaw. Recent studies of the evolutionary relationships of early crocodilians along with closer examinations of the morphology of fossil specimens suggest that only the first named species of Asiatosuchus, A. grangeri from the Eocene of Mongolia, belongs in the genus. Most species are now regarded as nomina dubia or "dubious names", meaning that their type specimens lack the unique anatomical features necessary to justify their classification as distinct species. Other species such as "A." germanicus and "A." depressifrons are still considered valid species, but they do not form an evolutionary grouping with A. grangeri that would warrant them being placed together in the genus Asiatosuchus.

<i>Bergisuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Bergisuchus is an extinct genus of small sebecosuchian mesoeucrocodylian known primarily from the Eocene Messel Pit in Germany. Few fossils of Bergisuchus have been discovered, only a single incomplete snout, a few partial lower jaws and some teeth. Despite being fragmentary, the jaw bones are enough to indicate that Bergisuchus had a short, deep, narrow snout and serrated teeth, quite unlike the broad flat snouts of modern crocodylians.

<i>Euthecodon</i> Extinct genus of crocodilian

Euthecodon is an extinct genus of long-snouted crocodile. It was common throughout much of Africa during the Neogene, with fossils being especially common in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Libya. Although superficially resembling that of gharials, the long snout was a trait developed independently from that of other crocodilians and suggests a diet of primarily fish. Euthecodon coexisted with a wide range of other crocodiles in the areas it inhabited before eventually going extinct during the Pleistocene.

<i>Sebecus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Sebecus is an extinct genus of sebecid crocodylomorph from Eocene of South America. Like other sebecosuchians, it was entirely terrestrial and carnivorous. The genus is currently represented by two species, the type S. icaeorhinus and S. ayrampu. Several other species have been referred to Sebecus, but were later reclassified as their own genera.

<i>Astorgosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Astorgosuchus is an extinct monospecific genus of crocodilian, closely related to true crocodiles, that lived in Pakistan during the late Oligocene period. This crocodile may have reached lengths of up to 8 m (26 ft) and is known to have preyed on many of the large mammals found in its environment. Bite marks of a large crocodile have been found on the bones of juvenile Paraceratherium, however if these were left by Astorgosuchus cannot be said with certainty. The genus contains a single species, Astorgosuchus bugtiensis, which was originally named as a species of Crocodylus in 1908 and was moved to its own genus in 2019.

<i>Baru huberi</i> Species of extinct reptile

"Baru" huberi is a species of mekosuchine Crocodilian from the Miocene of Australia. Although initially named as a member of the genus Baru, both phylogenetic analysis and additional discoveries of related forms have shown that this species belonged to a distinct mekosuchine lineage more closely related to Mekosuchus and Trilophosuchus. Consequently, several researchers have argued that it should be placed in its own genus, which has yet to be named.

<i>Gunggamarandu</i> Extinct genus of crocodilian

Gunggamarandu is an extinct monospecific genus of tomistomine crocodilian from Pliocene-Pleistocene aged deposits in the Darling Downs of Australia. Gunggamarandu represents the first tomistomine known from Oceania and it is also the southernmost known tomistomine to date. The type, and only known, species is Gunggamarandu maunala, which was described by Jorgo Ristevski et al. in 2021.

<i>Ultrastenos</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Ultrastenos is an extinct genus of Australian mekosuchine crocodilian first described in 2016. The type species Ultrastenos willisi was discovered at Riversleigh in northwestern Queensland, Australia, and lived during the Late Oligocene era. Following its discovery, it was speculated that Ultrastenos was a slender-snouted animal similar to modern gharials or freshwater crocodiles and that it may have inhabited forest pools and fed on small vertebrates like frogs and lizards. This is based on the peculiar shape of its mandible, which is wide towards the base of the head but constricts rapidly, leading into a narrow and gracile rostrum. Assuming that the holotype skull belonged to an adult individual, Ultrastenos may have been a rather small animal, approximately the size of a modern freshwater crocodile. However, Ultrastenos is only known from very fragmentary remains and thus among the most enigmatic mekosuchines. In a 2023 study multiple authors argue that the fragmentary nature of the animal means that further studies are required to truly test the hypothesis proposed in its original description, especially following the discovery of what is thought to have been a close relative.

<i>Kalthifrons</i> Extinct genus of crocodylian

Kalthifrons is an extinct monospecific genus of mekosuchine crocodylian known from the Pliocene Tirari Formation of Australia. More specifically, Kalthifrons was recovered from the Mampuwordu Sand Member, which underlies the younger sediments of the Pompapillina Member. This is significant, as the latter preserves some of the earliest records of the genus Crocodylus in Australia, which would eventually go on to replace mekosuchines. It is currently unclear whether or not the Tirari Crocodylus directly outcompeted Kalthifrons or simply moved into the region after the niche was left empty by the extinction of the local mekosuchines. Should the later be the case, then Kalthifrons may have simply been the victim of global cooling and aridification. A point in favour of the competition hypothesis is that both Kalthifrons and the Tirari Crocodylus have broadly similar skull forms, with both being interpreted as generalist semi-aquatic predators much like many of today's crocodiles. Though far from large, Kalthifrons was nonetheless bigger than many other mekosuchines such as Trilophosuchus and Mekosuchus. The genus is monotypic, meaning it contains only a single species, Kalthifrons aurivellensis.

Antecrocodylus is a genus of crocodilian from the middle Miocene of Chiang Muan and Mae Moh, Thailand. The holotype consists of the back of the skull and an associated mandible. While far from complete and heavily damaged, the material highlights how little is known about the crocodylid fauna of Miocene Asia. Furthermore, Antecrocodylus was recovered as the basalmost member of Crocodylidae, having diverged before osteolaemines and crocodylines split from one another. This may suggest that it could provide significant information regarding the origins and evolution of modern crocodiles.

References

  1. 1 2 Rio, Jonathan P.; Mannion, Philip D. (6 September 2021). "Phylogenetic analysis of a new morphological dataset elucidates the evolutionary history of Crocodylia and resolves the long-standing gharial problem". PeerJ . 9: e12094. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12094 . PMC   8428266 . PMID   34567843.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Molnar, R. E. (1981-10-31). "Pleistocene ziphodont crocodilians of Queensland". Records of the Australian Museum. 33 (19): 803–834. doi: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.33.1981.198 . ISSN   0067-1975.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Megirian, Dirk (1994). "A New Species of Quinkana Molnar (Eusuchia: Crocodylidae) from the Miocene Camfield Beds of Northern Australia". The Beagle. 11: 145–166.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Willis, Paul M.A.; Mackness, Brian S. (1996). "Quinkana babarra, a new species of ziphodont mekosuchine crocodile from the Early Pliocene Bluff Downs Local Fauna, Northern Australia with a revision of the genus". Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 116: 143–151.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Willis, Paul M.A. (1997). "New crocodilians from the late Oligocene White Hunter Site, Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland". Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 41: 423–438.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Wroe, Stephen (2002). "A review of terrestrial mammalian and reptilian carnivore ecology in Australian fossil faunas, and factors influencing their diversity: the myth of reptilian domination and its broader ramifications". Australian Journal of Zoology. 50 (1): 1. doi:10.1071/zo01053. ISSN   0004-959X.
  7. 1 2 Molnar, R. E. (2004). Dragons in the Dust: The Paleobiology of the Giant Monitor Lizard Megalania. Indiana University Press. pp. 174–175. ISBN   0-253-34374-7. OCLC   52775128.
  8. 1 2 Sobbe, I. H.; Price, G. J.; Knezour, R. A. (2013) A ziphodont crocodile from the late Pleistocene King Creek catchment, Darling Downs, Queensland. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum – Nature, 56 2: 601-606.
  9. 1 2 Willis, Paul M.A.; Molnar, Ralph E.; Scanlon, John D. (1993). "An early Eocene crocodilian from Murgon, southeastern Queensland". Kaupia: Darmstädter Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte. 3: 27–33.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mackness, Brian; Sutton, Richard (2000). "Possible evidence for intraspecific aggression in a Pliocene crocodile from north Queensland". Alcheringa . 24 (1): 55–62. Bibcode:2000Alch...24...55M. doi:10.1080/03115510008619523. S2CID   84759144.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sobbe, Ian H.; Price, Gilbert J.; Knezour, Robert A. (2013). "A ziphodont crocodile from the late Pleistocene King Creek catchment, Darling Downs, Queensland". Memoirs of the Queensland Museum . 52 (2): 601–606.
  12. Willis, P.M.A.; Mackness, B. (1996). "Quinkana babarra, a new species of ziphodont mekosuchine crocodile from the early Pliocene Bluff Downs Local Fauna, Northern Australia, with a revision of the genus". Proceedings and Journal of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 116: 143–151. Retrieved 2014-08-04.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Molnar, R. E. (1977-07-01). "Crocodile with Laterally Compressed Snout: First Find in Australia". Science. 197 (4298): 62–64. Bibcode:1977Sci...197...62M. doi:10.1126/science.197.4298.62. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   17828894. S2CID   41255154.
  14. Archer, Michael (1978). "Quaternary vertebrate faunas from the Texas Caves of southeastern Queensland". Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 19 (1): 61–109.
  15. Murray, Peter; Megirian, Dirk (December 1992). "Continuity and Contrast in Middle and Late Miocene Vertebrate Communities from the Northern Territory". The Beagle. 9: 195–217.
  16. Mackness, Brian S. (1995). "Palorchestes selestiae, a new species of palorchestid marsupial from the Early Pliocene Bluff Downs Local Fauna, northeastern Queensland". Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 38 (1): 603–609.
  17. 1 2 Michael S. Y. Lee; Adam M. Yates (27 June 2018). "Tip-dating and homoplasy: reconciling the shallow molecular divergences of modern gharials with their long fossil". Proceedings of the Royal Society B . 285 (1881). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1071 . PMC   6030529 . PMID   30051855.
  18. 1 2 Stein, Michael D.; Yates, Adam; Hand, Suzanne J.; Archer, Michael (2017). "Variation in the pelvic and pectoral girdles of Australian Oligo–Miocene mekosuchine crocodiles with implications for locomotion and habitus". PeerJ. 5: e3501. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3501 . PMC   5494174 . PMID   28674657.
  19. 1 2 3 4 Hocknull, Scott A.; Lewis, Richard; Arnold, Lee J.; Pietsch, Tim; Joannes-Boyau, Renaud; Price, Gilbert J.; Moss, Patrick; Wood, Rachel; Dosseto, Anthony; Louys, Julien; Olley, Jon (2020-05-18). "Extinction of eastern Sahul megafauna coincides with sustained environmental deterioration". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 2250. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.2250H. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15785-w. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   7231803 . PMID   32418985.