Boilerplate (spaceflight)

Last updated
Boilerplate version of Gemini spacecraft on display at Air Force Space and Missile Museum, Cape Canaveral, Florida, October 15, 2004 GeminiBP.jpg
Boilerplate version of Gemini spacecraft on display at Air Force Space and Missile Museum, Cape Canaveral, Florida, October 15, 2004
The prototype Space Shuttle orbiter Enterprise in full boilerplate stack configuration with External Tank and SRBs ready to undergo vibration testing at the Marshall Space Flight Center, October 4, 1978 Dynamic Test Stand (29893074602).jpg
The prototype Space Shuttle orbiter Enterprise in full boilerplate stack configuration with External Tank and SRBs ready to undergo vibration testing at the Marshall Space Flight Center, October 4, 1978

A boilerplate spacecraft, also known as a mass simulator, is a nonfunctional craft or payload that is used to test various configurations and basic size, load, and handling characteristics of rocket launch vehicles. It is far less expensive to build multiple, full-scale, non-functional boilerplate spacecraft than it is to develop the full system (design, test, redesign, and launch). In this way, boilerplate spacecraft allow components and aspects of cutting-edge aerospace projects to be tested while detailed contracts for the final project are being negotiated. These tests may be used to develop procedures for mating a spacecraft to its launch vehicle, emergency access and egress, maintenance support activities, and various transportation processes.

Contents

Boilerplate spacecraft are most commonly used to test crewed spacecraft; for example, in the early 1960s, NASA performed many tests using boilerplate Apollo spacecraft atop Saturn I rockets, and Mercury spacecraft atop Atlas rockets (for example Big Joe 1). The engine-less Space Shuttle Enterprise was used as a boilerplate to test launch stack assembly and transport to the launch pad. NASA's now-canceled Constellation program and ongoing Artemis program used boilerplate Orion spacecraft for various testing.

Mercury boilerplates

Mercury boilerplates were manufactured "in-house" by NASA Langley Research Center technicians prior to McDonnell Aircraft Company building the Mercury spacecraft. The boilerplate capsules were designed and used to test spacecraft recovery systems, and escape tower and rocket motors. Formal tests were done on the test pad at Langley and at Wallops Island using the Little Joe rockets. [1] [2]

Etymology

The term boilerplate originated from the use of boilerplate steel [3] for the construction of test articles/mock-ups. Historically, during the development of the Little Joe series of 7 launch vehicles, there was only one actual boilerplate capsule and it was called such since its conical section was made of steel at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. This capsule was used in a beach abort test, and then subsequently used in the LJ1A flight. However, the term subsequently came to be used for all the prototype capsules (which in their own right were nearly as complicated as the orbital capsules). This usage was technically incorrect, as those other capsules were not made of boilerplate, but the boilerplate term had effectively been genericized.[ citation needed ]

Notable events

Section sources. [4] [5]

Photos

Gemini boilerplates

There were seven Gemini boilerplates: BP-1, 2, 3, 3A, 4, 5, and 201. [8] Boilerplate 3A had functional doors and had multi-uses for testing watertightness, flotation collars, and egress procedures.[ citation needed ]

Photos

Apollo boilerplates

NASA created a variety of Apollo boilerplates. [9]

Launch escape system tests (LES)

Apollo boilerplate command modules were used for tests of the launch escape system (LES) jettison tower rockets and procedures:

Boilerplate tests

Specific Apollo BP units

BP-1101A

BP-1101A was used in numerous tests to develop spacecraft recovery equipment and procedures. Specifically, 1101A tested the air bags as part of the uprighting procedure when the Apollo lands upside down in the water. The sequence of the bags inflating caused the capsule to roll and upright itself. [16]

This McDonnell boilerplate is now on loan to the Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum, [17] Denver, Colorado, from the Smithsonian. BP-1101A has an external painted marking of AP.5. Examination of the interior in 2006 revealed large heavy steel ingots. [18] After further research, a new paint scheme was applied in June 2007.

BP-1102A

BP-1102 was used for water egress trainer for all Apollo flights, including by the crew of Apollo 11, the first lunar landing mission. It was also adapted for mock-up interior components and used by astronauts to practice routine and emergency exits from the spacecraft.[ citation needed ]

It was then modified again where the interior was set up to be configured either as Apollo/Soyuz or a proposed five-person Skylab Rescue vehicle. With these two conversions, astronauts could train for those special missions. It was finally transferred from NASA to the Smithsonian in 1977, and is displayed now at the Udvar-Hazy Center with the flotation collar and bags that were attached to Columbia (the Apollo 11 Command Module) at the end of its historic mission. [19]

BP-1210

BP-1210 Stafford Air & Space Museum, Weatherford, OK, US (146).jpg
BP-1210
Apollo 8 S-IVB rocket stage shortly after separation. The LM test article, a circular boilerplate model of the LM is visible with four triangular legs connecting it to the stage. AS08-16-2583.jpg
Apollo 8 S-IVB rocket stage shortly after separation. The LM test article, a circular boilerplate model of the LM is visible with four triangular legs connecting it to the stage.

BP-1210 was used in landing and recovery training and to test flotation devices. It is on display outside the Stafford Air & Space Museum. [20]

BP-1220/1228 Series

The purpose of this series design was to simulate the weight and other external physical characteristics of the Apollo command module. These prototypes were in the 9000 lb range for both laboratory water tanks and ocean tests. The experiments tested flotation collars, collar installations, and buoyancy characteristics. The Navy trained their recovery personnel for ocean collar installation and shipboard retrieval procedures. These boilerplates rarely had internal equipment. [21] See BP-1220 photo.

BP-1224

BP-1224 was a component-level flammability-test program to test for design decisions on selection and application of non-metallic materials. Boilerplate configuration comparisons with command and service module 2TV-1 and 101 were performed by North American. The NASA review board decided on February 5, 1967, that the boilerplate configuration had determined a reasonable "worst case" configuration, after more than 1,000 tests were performed. [22] See BP-1224 photo set.

BP-1227

Details regarding this test capsule are not clear, but most likely it was lost at sea somewhere between the Azores and the Bay of Biscay in early 1969, and recovered in June 1969 off Gibraltar by the Soviet fishing trawler Apatit (possibly a Soviet spy ship disguised as such, which was commonplace during the Cold War), [23] [24] [25] [26] transferred to the port of Murmansk in the Soviet Union, and returned to the US in September 1970 by the USCGC Southwind (WAGB-280). [27] It is now located in Grand Rapids, Michigan as a time capsule. [28] [29] See BP-1227 photo. The only certainties about this capsule are that it was returned to the United States at Murmansk early in September 1970 during a visit by the USCG Southwind who returned it to the Naval Air Station, Norfolk, Virginia. There it remained until title was passed to the Smithsonian in April 1976 when it was passed on to Grand Rapids, Michigan to serve as a time capsule. Two official sources – the US Navy and the US Coastguard – both say that it was lost by an ARRS (Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron) unit training in recovery procedures. A contemporary account of its return quotes a NASA spokesman as saying, " ... as far as NASA can determine the object... the Navy lost two years ago."

Apollo Lunar Module

A Lunar Module (LM) boilerplate, the LM test article, was launched with Apollo 8 to simulate the correct weight and balance of the LM which was not ready for the flight.

Space Shuttle boilerplates

Space Shuttle Orbiter model Pathfinder.jpg
The facilities test mockup is used to test the Mate-Demate Device at the Shuttle Landing Facility in Florida
Space Shuttle Challenger as STA-099.jpg
The Structural Test Article undergoing tests at the Rockwell facility in California
Enterprise is jettisoned from the SCA during the first free-flight of the Approach and Landing Test programme OV-101 first flight.jpg
Enterprise is jettisoned from the SCA during the first free-flight of the Approach and Landing Test programme
Enterprise lowered into test stand, view from below.tif
Enterprise KSC 1979.jpg
Enterprise at Vandenberg AFB SCL-6 with access tower and launch mount - DF-ST-86-09429.jpg
Enterprise in boilerplate configuration;
Left - Enterprise is lowered into the Dynamic Structural Test Facility for the Mated Ground Vibration Tests
Center - Enterprise is mated with ET and SRBs to undertake fit-check tests at KSC Pad 39A
Right - Enterprise with ET and SRBs in fit-check tests at SLC-6

As part of the Space Shuttle program, a number of boilerplate vehicles were constructed using various materials to undertake key tests of procedures, infrastructure and other elements that would take place during a Shuttle mission.

Facilities Test Article

In 1977, the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) constructed a simple steel and wood orbiter mockup to be used in fit check activities for various elements of the infrastructure needed to support the Space Shuttle, including roadway clearances and crane capabilities, as well as for testing in various buildings and structures used as part of the program, both at the MSFC and at the Kennedy Space Center. The mockup was designed to be the approximate size, shape and weight of an actual orbiter, and allowed these initial tests to be undertaken without using the far more expensive and delicate prototype orbiter, Enterprise. [30] Following its use as a test article, the mockup was stored until 1983, when it was refurbished and modified to more closely resemble an actual orbiter, before being displayed in Tokyo. [31]

Structural Test Article

The Structural Test Article was built as a test vehicle intended for use in initial vibration testing to simulate entire flights. [32] The STA was built as essentially a complete orbiter airframe, but with a mockup of the crew compartment installed, and the thermal insulation only fitted to the forward fuselage. [33] The simulation testing of the STA was undertaken over the course of eleven months following its rollout in February 1978; at the time, it was intended that the prototype orbiter Enterprise would be converted into a full flight ready model, but the cost of undertaking this work, along with a number of design changes that had taken place between Enterprise being rolled out, and the final construction of the first operational orbiter, Columbia, meant that it was decided instead to upgrade the STA into a flight model. This began following the end of the STA testing in January 1979, with the completed orbiter, named as Challenger , rolled out in June 1982. [32]

Prototype

Approach and landing tests

In January 1977, the prototype orbiter Enterprise was delivered to Edwards Air Force Base in California for the beginning of its overall test programme, which would encompass flight tests, fit-check and procedures testing of the orbiter, its systems, the facilities and procedures required to launch, fly and land the spacecraft safely. During 1977, Enterprise was used in what was called the Approach and Landing Tests programme of testing, which encompassed mating the orbiter to the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft, a modified Boeing 747 to test the taxiing and flight characteristics of the Orbiter / SCA combination. This included flights of the combination in which Enterprise itself was powered up and crewed, to test crew procedures systems in flight, and finally a set of five so-called "free-flights", with Enterprise jettisoned from the SCA at altitude to land on its own, testing the orbiter's own flying and handling characteristics. [34]

Vibration and fit-check tests

In March 1978, following its use in flight tests during the ALT program, Enterprise was taken to the MSFC in Huntsville, Alabama for use in the Mated Vertical Ground Vibration Test. This would see Enterprise mated to an empty External Tank and dummy Solid Rocket Boosters, creating a boilerplate version of the complete Space Shuttle stack for the first time. Inside the Dynamic Structural Test Facility at the MSFC, the stack was subjected to a series of vibration tests simulating the various stages that it would be subjected to during launch. [35]

Following its use at Huntsville, Enterprise was then taken to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where she was again used in full boilerplate configuration to this time test the procedures of assembling and transporting the stack from the Vehicle Assembly Building to Launch Complex 39, as well as procedures required upon its arrival at the launch pad. [36] [37] In 1985, Enterprise was used again for this purpose, this time with the boilerplate configuration used to test the Air Force shuttle facilities at Vandenberg Air Force Base, including a full mating on the SLC-6 launch pad. [38]

Orion boilerplate

Development

The construction of the first Orion boilerplate, [39] was a basic mockup prototype to test the assembling sequences and launch procedures at NASA's Langley Research Center while Lockheed aerospace engineers assemble the first rocket motors for the spacecraft's escape tower. The first boilerplate went to Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, California, for integration of Lockheed's avionics and NASA's developmental flight instrumentation [40] prior to shipment to New Mexico's White Sands Missile Range for the first Orion pad abort test (PA-1) in 2009. On November 20, 2008 a complete test of the abort rockets took place in Utah. [41] PA-1 is the first of the six test events in Orion Abort Flight Test subproject. Lockheed Martin Corp. was awarded the contract to build Orion on August 31, 2006.[ citation needed ]

Other boilerplates would be used to test thermal, electromagnetic, audio, mechanical vibration conditions and research studies. These tests for the Orion spacecraft would be done at Plum Brook Station in the agency's Ohio-based Glenn Research Center. [42] [43]

Photos

Commercial spacecraft boilerplates

In the 2010s, several commercially designed space capsules used boilerplate units on the initial launches of new launch vehicles.

See also

Notes

  1. NASA Mercury History Archived January 27, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Sections #44 and #47
  2. Mercury Project Boilerplates Archived November 7, 2007, at the Wayback Machine and Little Joe Rockets with Boilerplates Archived August 2, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  3. i.e. sheet steel typically used to manufacture boilers
  4. Mercury Boilerplate Tests
  5. NASA History Archives
  6. NASA History Chronology
  7. 1 2 Astronautix Chronology – Quarter 1 1961 at Encyclopedia Astronautica
  8. Field Guide to American Spacecraft
  9. "Apollo BP-19 Boilerplate Spacecraft Test Unit". www.skytamer.com. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
  10. 1 2 3 4 "NASA History Apollo". Archived from the original on 2007-08-10. Retrieved 2007-06-05.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LJSC: Apollo/SkylabB ASTP and Shuttle Orbiter Major End Items, Final Report, March, 1978
  12. 1 2 3 4 NASA Apollo History Vol. IV
  13. "Long Beach Press Telegram article 7/16/2008". Archived from the original on 2011-06-13. Retrieved 2008-07-22.
  14. Little Joe II Mission A-003 / BP-22 – April 1965 (PDF)
  15. "Saturn V". U.S. Space & Rocket Center. February 14, 2008. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  16. Charles A. Biggs Sr., Chief, Special Activities Section, Special Event Office, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, letter dated July 1, 1975. Files of Wings Museum, Denver, CO.
  17. Wings Over the Rockies Air & Space Museum Official Site
  18. Lance Barber, Curator of Military Aircraft, Wings Over the Rockies Air & Space Museum, Denver, CO.
  19. Smithsonian NASM: Apollo Boilerplate Archived April 8, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  20. Stafford Museum exhibits\
  21. Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum BP-1228 Photo. Archived December 10, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  22. NASA: Apollo BP-1224
  23. "USCGC Southwind, 1944 WAG/ WAGB-280 (ex-Admiral Makarov; ex-Atka)". United States Coast Guard Historian's Office. U.S. Department of Homeland Security DHS Office of Inspector General. February 27, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
  24. Pugh, Eddie. "NASA's Lost Boilerplate – The Story of BP-1227" (PDF). Jones site. Landing and Recovery Division – Gemini and Apollo Programs. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
  25. "Modern History: Soviets Recovered an Apollo Capsule!". All Empires Online History Community. Web Wiz. August 30, 2005. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
  26. Ермолаев, Дмитрий (February 28, 2015). "Космический улов" [Space catch]. Мурманский вестник (in Russian). Russia. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
  27. Wade, Mark (2008). "Soviets Recovered an Apollo Capsule!". Astronautix. Archived from the original on January 2, 2010. Retrieved January 8, 2010.
  28. Current Location
  29. "Apollo/Skylab ASTP and Shuttle orbiter major end items" (PDF) (Press release). NASA JSC. March 1978. p. 20. Retrieved 2019-08-15.
  30. Kesner, Kenneth (June 12, 2008). "Shuttle mockup undergoes repairs". The Huntsville Times . Archived from the original on December 4, 2011. Retrieved July 6, 2011.
  31. Jenkins, Dennis R. (2001). Space shuttle: the history of the National Space Transportation System: the first 100 missions . US: Midland Publishing. pp.  215. ISBN   978-1857801163.
  32. 1 2 Lardas, Mark (2012). Space Shuttle Launch System: 1972–2004. Osprey Publishing. p. 36.
  33. Evans, Ben (2007). Space Shuttle Challenger: Ten Journeys Into the Unknown. Praxis Publishing. p. 8. ISBN   978-0-387-46355-1.
  34. Merlin, Peter (11 July 2011). "NASA Dryden and the Space Shuttles". nasa.gov. NASA. Archived from the original on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
  35. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center: Enterprise Boilerplate Tests Archived November 15, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  36. NASA Kennedy Space Center: Enterprise on Launch Pad 39A Archived 2007-11-24 at the Wayback Machine
  37. NASA: OV-101 Vertical Tests Archived March 26, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
  38. "40 Years Ago: Space Shuttle Enterprise rolls to the Pad". nasa.gov. NASA. 1 May 2019. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
  39. "NASA: Orion mockup". Archived from the original on 2021-11-15. Retrieved 2008-03-13.
  40. "NASA Centers in California: Keys to the Future" (PDF). California Space Authority. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-28.
  41. "NASA: Constellation Abort Test Nov 2008". Archived from the original on 2021-04-08. Retrieved 2008-11-24.
  42. "Environmental Assessment for NASA Launch Abort System (LAS) Test Activities at the U.S. Army White Sands Missile Range, NM FINAL" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-28. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
  43. "A Spiral Stairway to the Moon and Beyond". Space.com . 2005-02-09. Archived from the original on 2010-10-26.
  44. "SpaceX Achieves Orbital Bullseye With Inaugural Flight of Falcon 9 Rocket: A major win for NASA's plan to use commercial rockets for astronaut transport". SpaceX. June 7, 2010. Archived from the original on 2011-06-17. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  45. "Antares Test Launch "A-ONE Mission" Overview Briefing" (PDF). Orbital Sciences. April 17, 2013. Retrieved April 18, 2013.
  46. Harwood, William (April 21, 2013). "Antares rocket climbs into space on maiden flight". CBS News. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  47. "Preview: SpaceX Set to Debut Falcon Heavy Rocket via Long-Awaited Shakedown Flight". Spaceflight101. 6 February 2018. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  48. Musk, Elon. "Third burn successful. Exceeded Mars orbit and kept going to the Asteroid Belt". Twitter. Retrieved February 7, 2018.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Project Mercury</span> Initial American crewed spaceflight program (1958–1963)

Project Mercury was the first human spaceflight program of the United States, running from 1958 through 1963. An early highlight of the Space Race, its goal was to put a man into Earth orbit and return him safely, ideally before the Soviet Union. Taken over from the US Air Force by the newly created civilian space agency NASA, it conducted 20 uncrewed developmental flights, and six successful flights by astronauts. The program, which took its name from Roman mythology, cost $2.68 billion. The astronauts were collectively known as the "Mercury Seven", and each spacecraft was given a name ending with a "7" by its pilot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space Shuttle program</span> 1972–2011 United States human spaceflight program

The Space Shuttle program was the fourth human spaceflight program carried out by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which accomplished routine transportation for Earth-to-orbit crew and cargo from 1981 to 2011. Its official program name was Space Transportation System (STS), taken from a 1969 plan for a system of reusable spacecraft where it was the only item funded for development, as a proposed nuclear shuttle in the plan was cancelled in 1972. It flew 135 missions and carried 355 astronauts from 16 countries, many on multiple trips.

Human spaceflight programs have been conducted, started, or planned by multiple countries and companies. Until the 21st century, human spaceflight programs were sponsored exclusively by governments, through either the military or civilian space agencies. With the launch of the privately funded SpaceShipOne in 2004, a new category of human spaceflight programs – commercial human spaceflight – arrived. By the end of 2022, three countries and one private company (SpaceX) had successfully launched humans to Earth orbit, and two private companies had launched humans on a suborbital trajectory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pad Abort Test 1</span>

Pad Abort Test 1 was the first abort test of the Apollo spacecraft on November 7, 1963.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constellation program</span> Cancelled 2005–2010 NASA human spaceflight program

The Constellation program was a crewed spaceflight program developed by NASA, the space agency of the United States, from 2005 to 2009. The major goals of the program were "completion of the International Space Station" and a "return to the Moon no later than 2020" with a crewed flight to the planet Mars as the ultimate goal. The program's logo reflected the three stages of the program: the Earth (ISS), the Moon, and finally Mars—while the Mars goal also found expression in the name given to the program's booster rockets: Ares. The technological aims of the program included the regaining of significant astronaut experience beyond low Earth orbit and the development of technologies necessary to enable sustained human presence on other planetary bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apollo (spacecraft)</span> Saturn V-launched payload that took men to the Moon

The Apollo spacecraft was composed of three parts designed to accomplish the American Apollo program's goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by the end of the 1960s and returning them safely to Earth. The expendable (single-use) spacecraft consisted of a combined command and service module (CSM) and an Apollo Lunar Module (LM). Two additional components complemented the spacecraft stack for space vehicle assembly: a spacecraft–LM adapter (SLA) designed to shield the LM from the aerodynamic stress of launch and to connect the CSM to the Saturn launch vehicle and a launch escape system (LES) to carry the crew in the command module safely away from the launch vehicle in the event of a launch emergency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Little Joe II</span> American rocket

Little Joe II was an American rocket used from 1963 to 1966 for five uncrewed tests of the Apollo spacecraft launch escape system (LES), and to verify the performance of the command module parachute recovery system in abort mode. It was named after a similar rocket designed for the same function in Project Mercury. Launched from White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, it was the smallest of four launch rockets used in the Apollo program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Project Gemini</span> 1961–1966 US human spaceflight program

Project Gemini was the second United States human spaceflight program to fly. Conducted after the first American crewed space program, Project Mercury, while the Apollo program was still in early development, Gemini was conceived in 1961 and concluded in 1966. The Gemini spacecraft carried a two-astronaut crew. Ten Gemini crews and 16 individual astronauts flew low Earth orbit (LEO) missions during 1965 and 1966.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space capsule</span> Type of spacecraft

A space capsule is a spacecraft designed to transport cargo, scientific experiments, and/or astronauts to and from space. Capsules are distinguished from other spacecraft by the ability to survive reentry and return a payload to the Earth's surface from orbit or sub-orbit, and are distinguished from other types of recoverable spacecraft by their blunt shape, not having wings and often containing little fuel other than what is necessary for a safe return. Capsule-based crewed spacecraft such as Soyuz or Orion are often supported by a service or adapter module, and sometimes augmented with an extra module for extended space operations. Capsules make up the majority of crewed spacecraft designs, although one crewed spaceplane, the Space Shuttle, has flown in orbit.

Apollo abort modes were procedures by which the nominal launch of an Apollo spacecraft, either the Saturn IB or Saturn V rocket, could be terminated. The abort of the flight allowed for the rescue of the crew if the rocket failed catastrophically. Depending on how far the flight had progressed, different procedure or modes would be used. In the history of the Apollo Program, none of the abort modes were ever used on any of the fifteen crewed Apollo spacecraft flights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Launch escape system</span> A system to get the crew to safety if a rocket launch fails

A launch escape system (LES) or launch abort system (LAS) is a crew-safety system connected to a space capsule. It is used in the event of a critical emergency to quickly separate the capsule from its launch vehicle in case of an emergency requiring the abort of the launch, such as an impending explosion. The LES is typically controlled by a combination of automatic rocket failure detection, and a manual activation for the crew commander's use. The LES may be used while the launch vehicle is on the launch pad, or during its ascent. Such systems are usually of three types:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space Center Houston</span> Science museum at NASA Space Center, Houston, Texas

Space Center Houston is a science museum that serves as the official visitor center of NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. It was designated a Smithsonian Affiliate museum in 2014. The organization is owned by NASA, and operated under a contract by the nonprofit Manned Spaceflight Education Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization. The Johnson Space Center is the home of Mission Control and astronaut training.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orion abort modes</span> Launch abort modes used by the Orion spacecraft

The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle is equipped with a launch escape system. Orion has several abort modes. Some of these may not use the LAS itself, but would use the second stage of the SLS, or even the Orion vehicle's own propulsion system instead.

A pad abort test is a kind of test of a launch escape system which conducted by setting the system along with the spacecraft still on the ground and let the system activate to carry the spacecraft flying away, then separate in the air and make the spacecraft land safely. The purpose of the test is to determine how well the system could get the crew of a spacecraft to safety in an emergency on the launch pad. As the spacecraft is set still on the ground, the test is also called "zero-altitude abort test" in against "high-altitude abort test".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saturn V dynamic test vehicle</span> Moon rocket test article in Huntsville, Alabama

The Saturn V dynamic test vehicle, designated SA-500D, is a prototype Saturn V rocket used by NASA to test the performance of the rocket when vibrated to simulate the shaking which subsequent rockets would experience during launch. It was the first full-scale Saturn V completed by the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). Though SA-500D never flew, it was instrumental in the development of the Saturn V rocket which propelled the first men to the Moon as part of the Apollo program. Built under the direction of Dr. Wernher von Braun, it served as the test vehicle for all of the Saturn support facilities at MSFC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space Shuttle retirement</span> End of NASA Space Shuttle program in 2011

The retirement of NASA's Space Shuttle fleet took place from March to July 2011. Discovery was the first of the three active Space Shuttles to be retired, completing its final mission on March 9, 2011; Endeavour did so on June 1. The final shuttle mission was completed with the landing of Atlantis on July 21, 2011, closing the 30-year Space Shuttle program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orion (spacecraft)</span> American–European spacecraft class for the Artemis program

Orion is a partially reusable crewed spacecraft used in NASA's Artemis program. The spacecraft consists of a Crew Module (CM) space capsule designed by Lockheed Martin and the European Service Module (ESM) manufactured by Airbus Defence and Space. Capable of supporting a crew of four beyond low Earth orbit, Orion can last up to 21 days undocked and up to six months docked. It is equipped with solar panels, an automated docking system, and glass cockpit interfaces modeled after those used in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. A single AJ10 engine provides the spacecraft's primary propulsion, while eight R-4D-11 engines, and six pods of custom reaction control system engines developed by Airbus, provide the spacecraft's secondary propulsion. Orion is intended to be launched atop a Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, with a tower launch escape system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration Flight Test-1</span> 2014 unmanned test flight of the Orion spacecraft by NASA

Exploration Flight Test-1 or EFT-1 was the first test flight of the crew module portion of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle. Without a crew, it was launched on December 5, 2014, at 12:05 UTC, by a Delta IV Heavy rocket from Space Launch Complex 37B at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soyuz abort modes</span> Soyuz spacecraft emergency crew rescue systems

In the event of catastrophic failure, the Soyuz spacecraft has a series of automated and semi-automated abort modes to rescue the crew. The abort systems have been refined since the first piloted flights and all abort scenarios for the Soyuz MS are expected to be survivable for the crew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test</span> Post-launch abort test of the SpaceX Dragon 2 spacecraft

The Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test was a successful test of the SpaceX Dragon 2 abort system, conducted on 19 January 2020. It was the final assessment for the Crew Dragon capsule and Falcon 9 launch system before they would be certified to carry humans into space. Booster B1046.4 and an uncrewed capsule C205 were launched from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) on a suborbital trajectory, followed by an in-flight abort of the capsule at max Q and supersonic speed. The test was carried out successfully: the capsule pulled itself away from the booster after launch control commanded the abort, and landed safely.

References