Chelsea Girls

Last updated

Chelsea Girls
Chelsea Girls, movie poster, 3.jpg
US theatrical release poster
Directed by Andy Warhol
Paul Morrissey
Written by Ronald Tavel
Andy Warhol
Produced byAndy Warhol
Starring
CinematographyAndy Warhol
Paul Morrissey (uncredited)
Music by The Velvet Underground
Distributed byFilmmakers Distribution Center
Release date
  • September 15, 1966 (1966-09-15)
Running time
210 minutes (approx.)
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$1,500 (approx.) [1]

Chelsea Girls is a 1966 American experimental underground film directed by Andy Warhol and Paul Morrissey. Noted for its split-screen presentation and alternating use of color and black-and-white footage, the film features a series of loosely connected vignettes centered on Warhol's "superstars," many of whom were filmed inside New York's Chelsea Hotel. Upon its release, Chelsea Girls became Warhol's first commercial success and is regarded as a landmark of underground cinema for its unconventional structure, improvisational performances, and voyeuristic style. The original cut runs at just over three hours long. [2]

Contents

In 2024, the film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant." [3]

Cast

The cast of the film is largely made up of persons playing themselves, and are credited as follows:

Production

Development

According to scriptwriter Ronald Tavel, Warhol first brought up the idea for the film in the back room of Max's Kansas City, Warhol's favorite nightspot, in 1966. Warhol superstars Nico, Edie Sedgwick, and International Velvet were all living in the Chelsea area. Warhol, newly returned from touring with the Velvet Underground, decided to make a film set there and titled it Chelsea Girls. He had no specific theme in mind and no real script—only the idea of filming "people doing different things." [1] Warhol invested roughly $1,500 to the production, a sum at least three times greater than the typical budget for his underground films. [1]

Shooting

The film was shot in the summer and early autumn of 1966, in various rooms and locations inside the Hotel Chelsea. [4] Filming also took place at Warhol's studio, The Factory. Appearing in the film were many of Warhol's regulars, including Nico, Brigid Berlin, Gerard Malanga, Mary Woronov (as Hanoi Hannah), Ingrid Superstar, "International Velvet" and Eric Emerson. According to Burns' documentary, Warhol and his companions completed an average of one 33-minute segment per week.

Nico (left) and Ondine (right) in the final scene of Chelsea Girls. This "still" comes from the 2003 Italian DVD print of the film. Nicoondinechelseagirls.png
Nico (left) and Ondine (right) in the final scene of Chelsea Girls. This "still" comes from the 2003 Italian DVD print of the film.

Editing

Once principal photography wrapped, Warhol and co-director Paul Morrissey selected the 12 most striking vignettes they had filmed, and then projected them, side-by-side, to create a visual juxtaposition, of both contrasting images and divergent content (the so-called "white" or light, and innocent aspects of life, against the "black" or darker, more disturbing aspects). As a result, the 6.5-hour running time was effectivelly cut in half, to 3 hours and 15 minutes. However, part of Warhol's concept for the film was that it would be unlike watching a regular movie, the two projectors could never achieve exact synchronization from viewing to viewing; therefore -- despite specific instructions of where individual sequences would be played, during the running time, each viewing of the film would, in essence, be an entirely different experience.

Several of the sequences have gone on to attain a cult status, most notably the "Pope" sequence, featuring avant-garde actor and poet Robert Olivo, or Ondine as he called himself, as well as a segment featuring Mary Woronov titled "Hanoi Hannah," one of two portions of the film scripted specifically by Tavel.

Notably missing is a sequence Warhol shot with Edie Sedgwick which, according to Morrissey, Warhol excised from the final film at the insistence of Sedgwick, who claimed she was under contract to Bob Dylan's manager Albert Grossman at the time the film was made. Sedgwick's footage was used in the Warhol film Afternoon.

The film was the inspiration for star Nico's 1967 debut album, Chelsea Girl , which featured a ballad-like track titled "Chelsea Girls", which was written about the hotel and its inhabitants.

Release

Chelsea Girls premiered at the Film-Makers' Cinémathèque on September 15, 1966, and became the first underground film to transition from the 200-seat venue, the local showcase for experimental cinema, to a conventional Midtown Manhattan art theater. [5]

Warhol and his entourage attended the 1967 Cannes Film Festival to present the film, but it wasn't shown. [6] "The festival authorities explained that the film was too long, there were technical problems, there was no time." [6]

Poster

The poster for the film, featuring a nude photograph of teenage model Clare Shenstone, was designed for its London release by graphic artist Alan Aldridge. [7] Celebrated for its creativity and eroticism, the poster captures the sensual essence of the film. Warhol was reportedly very pleased with the design, commenting that he "wished the movie was as good as the poster." [8] The image was later used as the cover art for English alternative rock band Felt's 1984 album The Splendour of Fear .

Certification

In the UK, Chelsea Girls was refused a theatrical certificate in 1967 by the British Board of Film Classification. [9]

Critical reception

Still from Chelsea Girls, featuring Mary Woronov in color photography on the left side, and black & white photography on the right. Chelseagirlsscreen.png
Still from Chelsea Girls, featuring Mary Woronov in color photography on the left side, and black & white photography on the right.

Although the film garnered the most commercial success of Warhol's films, reaction to it was mixed. Filmmakers Jonas Mekas and Shirley Clarke hailed the film as a great motion-picture "break-through." [10]

Newsday reviewer Joseph Gelmis wrote: "The Chelsea Girls" is a crude home movie that is gripping. boring, sick and remarkable, all at once. It has the raw power of a clinical documentarv. Certainly this unedited record of Warhol's Beautiful People, or, if you will, the Whole Sick Crew, acting out their private rituals and fantasies for free [,] can't be called a movie in any conventional sense. It might, it has been observed, been made at the workshops of Caligula or De Sade if those worthies had had a camera handy." [11]

Film critic Bosley Crowther of TheNew York Times wrote that Chelsea Girls "is really nothing more than an extensive and pretentious entertainment for voyeurs … Already some sympathetic critics have hailed it as a shattering tour de force that artfully reveals a composite of the Great Society. But this is absurdly overstating a documentation which, at best, shows the squalor of a few unfortunate people—and not very artfully at that." [12] He concluded that Warhol’s aesthetic aims to saturate or hypnotize the viewer into an insensible state. [12]

Variety wrote that the film was "a pointless, excruciatingly dull three-and-a-half hours spent in the company of Andy Warhol's friends." [13]

Film critic Roger Ebert reviewed the film in June 1967, and had a negative response to it, granting it one star out of four. He stated, "what we have here is 3½ hours of split-screen improvisation poorly photographed, hardly edited at all, employing perversion and sensation like chili sauce to disguise the aroma of the meal. Warhol has nothing to say and no technique to say it with. He simply wants to make movies, and he does: hours and hours of them." [14]

Subsequent reviews

On Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 50%, based on reviews from 10 critics. [15]

Kenneth Baker of the San Francisco Chronicle reviewed the film in honor of its screening in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2002, and gave the film a positive review, stating "The tyranny of the camera is the oppression The Chelsea Girls records and imposes. No wonder it still seems radical, despite all we have seen onscreen and off since 1966." [16] Jonathan Rosenbaum also gave the film a positive review, stating that "the results are often spellbinding; the juxtaposition of two film images at once gives the spectator an unusual amount of freedom in what to concentrate on and what to make of these variously whacked-out performers." [17] TV Guide reviewed the film in December 2006, granting it four stars, calling it "fascinating, provocative, and hilarious" and "a film whose importance as a 1960s cultural statement outweighs any intrinsic value it may have as a film." [18]

In 2024, the film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant". [19]

Availability

Home media

Chelsea Girls is largely unavailable for home video format. The film belongs to the Andy Warhol Foundation, and it, along with Warhol's other films (apart from a handful of his Screen Tests , which have since been released on DVD) [20] have never seen home video releases in the United States. In Europe, however, a handful of Warhol's films were released on DVD, including a short-lived DVD print of Chelsea Girls which was available in Italy for some time. This Italian DVD print, which is the film's only official home video release, was released on September 16, 2003. [21]

Museum screenings

While the film is unavailable for personal purchase, it is often screened at art museums, and has been shown at The Museum of Modern Art [22] (which owns a rare print of the film reels) as well as The Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The film was screened in San Francisco for the first time in nearly 20 years at Castro Theatre in April 2002. [23] Screenings were held in 2010 at the Seattle Art Museum [24] and at the Varsity Theater in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, [25] in 2011 at the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, Georgia, [26] and the Block Museum of Art in Evanston, Illinois in 2016. [27] The full 3 1/2 hour version of the film was screened at the Brooklyn Museum in a custom built theatre within their edition of the Andy Warhol: Revelation exhibit from November 19, 2021 to June 19, 2022. [28]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Lester, Elenore (December 11, 1966). "So He Stopped Painting Brillo Boxes and Bought a Movie Camera". The New York Times.
  2. Canby, Vincent (December 1, 1966). "'CHELSEA GIRLS' IN MIDTOWN TEST; Warhol 'Underground' Film Gets Commercial Booking". The New York Times.
  3. "He Has Trouble Communicating But Not in 'The Chelsea Girls'". Newsday (Suffolk Edition). 1966-12-08. pp. 3A. Retrieved 2025-12-14.
  4. Leve, Ariel 'New York Storeys' The Sunday Times Magazine, 25 March 2007, pp. 40–51. p. 49
  5. Canby, Vincent (December 1, 1966). "'CHELSEA GIRLS' IN MIDTOWN TEST; Warhol 'Underground' Film Gets Commercial Booking". The New York Times.
  6. 1 2 Sheffy, Pearl (1967-05-28). "Andy Warhol At Cannes". The San Francisco Sunday Examiner & Chronicle. p. 6. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
  7. "Man in the Mask". The Guardian. London. 16 October 2005. Retrieved November 18, 2012.
  8. Tate. "'Chelsea Girls', Andy Warhol, 1967". Tate. Retrieved 2025-12-14.
  9. Heins, Marjorie (September 11, 2007). Not in Front of the Children: 'Indecency,' Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth. Rutgers University Press. p. 208. ISBN   9780813543888.
  10. Canby, Vincent (December 1, 1966). "'CHELSEA GIRLS' IN MIDTOWN TEST; Warhol 'Underground' Film Gets Commercial Booking". The New York Times.
  11. "He Has Trouble Communicating But Not in 'The Chelsea Girls'". Newsday (Suffolk Edition). 1966-12-08. pp. 3A. Retrieved 2025-12-14.
  12. 1 2 Crowther, Bosley (December 11, 1966). "The Underground Overflows". The New York Times.
  13. "The Chelsea Girls". Variety. December 31, 1966. Retrieved September 8, 2017.
  14. Ebert, Roger (27 June 1967). "Roger Ebert reviews "Chelsea Girls"". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on 11 January 2013. Retrieved 8 July 2009.
  15. "Chelsea Girls". Rotten Tomatoes . Retrieved 9 July 2009.
  16. Baker, Kenneth (11 April 2002). "Film flashes back to Warhol '60s / Rarely seen movie a near overdose of artist's voyeurism". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 8 July 2009.
  17. Rosenbaum, Jonathan (26 October 1985). "The Chelsea Girls". Reader.
  18. "Review: The Chelsea Girls". TV Guide. 17 December 2006. Archived from the original on 6 March 2012. Retrieved 9 July 2009.
  19. "25 Films Added to National Film Registry for Preservation". December 17, 2024. Retrieved December 17, 2024.
  20. "The 13 Most Beautiful Songs for Andy Warhol's Screen Tests DVD". Amazon.com. 7 April 2009. Retrieved 8 July 2009.
  21. "Chelsea Girls". Amazon.com. 16 September 2003. Retrieved 17 September 2009.
  22. "MOMA: The Chelsea Girls screening: 8 June 2007". Museum of Modern Art. Retrieved 8 July 2009.
  23. "San Francisco Cinematheque Film Calendar: April–July 2002". San Francisco Cinematheque. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2009.
  24. "Seattle Art Museum Film Calendar: May 21, 2010". Seattle Art Museum. Archived from the original on 24 May 2010. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  25. http://www.ackland.org/visit/calendar.php?q=2010-11-18%5B%5D
  26. "High Presents "Modern Masters of Film: From Edison to Scorsese," with 11 Films from One of the World's Most Important Film Repositories". High Museum of Art . Archived from the original on 2014-10-06.
  27. "The Chelsea Girls". The Block Museum of Art. Retrieved 19 January 2019.
  28. "Brooklyn Museum: Andy Warhol: Revelation".