Child tax credit (United States)

Last updated

The United States federal child tax credit (CTC) is a partially-refundable [a] tax credit for parents with dependent children. It provides $2,000 in tax relief per qualifying child, with up to $1,600 of that refundable (subject to a refundability threshold, phase-in and phase-out [b] ). In 2021, following the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, it was temporarily raised to $3,600 per child under the age of 6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 6 and 17; it was also made fully-refundable [c] and half was paid out as monthly benefits. The CTC is scheduled to revert to a $1,000 credit after 2025.

Contents

The CTC was estimated to have lifted about 3 million children out of poverty in 2016. [2] A Columbia University study estimated that the expansion of the CTC in the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act reduced child poverty by an additional 26%, and would have decreased child poverty by an additional 40% had all eligible households claimed the credit. [3] The expansion also substantially reduced food insufficiency. [4] [5] [6] Research indicates that cash transfers to families, like the refundable portion of the CTC, lead to improved math and reading test scores, a higher likelihood of high school graduation, higher college attendance, and long-term increases in income for both parents and children. [7] [8] Studies have also determined that the CTC increases labor force participation among low-income parents. [9] [10]

The CTC was created in 1997 as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. Initially a small $500 per child nonrefundable credit, it was progressively made larger and extended to more taxpayers through subsequent legislation. In particular, it was temporarily raised to $1,000 per child and made refundable, subject to a phase-in, by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003; that raise was made permanent by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012; the credit was temporarily raised to $2,000 per child, with up to $1,400 of that refundable, and the number of taxpayers eligible substantially expanded by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017; and finally the credit was expanded substantially and made fully available to very low-income people for one year by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

Background

A tax credit enables taxpayers to subtract the amount of the credit from their tax liability. [d] In the United States, to calculate taxes owed, a taxpayer first subtracts certain "adjustments" (a particular set of deductions like contributions to certain retirement accounts and student loan interest payments) from their gross income (the sum of all their wages, interest, capital gains or loss, business income, IRA and pension income, Social Security income, rents, royalties, and unemployment compensation) to determine their adjusted gross income (AGI). They then subtract from their AGI the larger of the standard deduction or itemized deductions, as well as the deduction for qualified business income, to determine their taxable income. They then apply the relevant tax rates to their taxable income (See How do federal income tax rates work? for more information on income tax brackets). Finally, they subtract any tax credits they are eligible for from their tax liability to determine the amount of tax that they owe. This is summarized by the equation below:

US Income Tax Formula (Basic).png

There are two basic types of tax credits: non-refundable tax credits and refundable tax credits. A tax credit is non-refundable if the credit can only be used to reduce tax owed to $0. It is refundable if it can be used to produce a negative tax liability, which will be refunded to them, i.e. they will receive a tax refund that is larger than any taxes they have already paid. For example, if a taxpayer with a tax liability before tax credits of $500 were eligible for a $2,000 refundable tax credit, they would receive a tax refund that is $1,500 larger than any taxes they have already paid. If the $2,000 credit was non-refundable, by contrast, they would only be able to reduce their taxes owed to $0 and would not receive a refund for the remaining $1,500 of the credit.

Overview

2018–2025, excluding 2021

The child tax credit under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Top plateau would be higher for more children. US Child Tax Credit TCJA.png
The child tax credit under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Top plateau would be higher for more children.

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), for the years 2018–2025 (excluding 2021, see below section Temporary Expansion in 2021) the CTC allows taxpayers to reduce their federal tax liabilities by $2,000 per qualifying child (see Eligibility). The maximum credit a taxpayer can receive is thus equal to the number of qualifying children multiplied by $2,000 (e.g. a family with 3 qualifying children is eligible for $2,000 x 3 = $6,000 in tax relief). The credit begins to phase out at a rate of $50 for every $1,000 in additional income over $200,000 for single filers and unmarried heads of households or over $400,000 for married joint filers. [11]

Taxpayers whose incomes are too low to claim the full $2,000 credit (i.e. they have tax liabilities below $2,000) are eligible for the additional child tax credit (ACTC), a phased-in $1,400 ($1,600 starting 2023 [12] ) refundable tax credit with similar qualifications. [13] For example, if a taxpayer has one qualifying child and a tax liability of $100, then they can use $100 of the CTC to reduce their tax liability to $0 and then claim the full $1,400 ACTC (which will be refunded to them) for a total benefit of $1,500. Note, however, that the sum of the ACTC and CTC cannot exceed the maximum credit of $2,000. [14] For instance, a taxpayer with one qualifying child and an $800 tax liability can use $800 of the CTC to reduce their tax liability to $0, but can only claim $1,200 of the ACTC (which will be refunded to them), for the maximum allowable benefit of $2,000.

However, a certain amount of earned income is required to begin taking the credit. The ACTC is calculated only on amount of earned income above $2,500. It phases in above $2,500, at a rate of 15%, up to the maximum-allowable $1,400 per child. [15] For example, a taxpayer who makes $8,000 in earned income and has one qualifying child is eligible for .15($8,000–$2,500)=$825 of the ACTC. Notice that the income range of the phase-in increases with the number of qualifying children: a taxpayer making $30,000, for instance, could claim the full ACTC if they have one child (since .15($30,000 – $2,500) = $4,125 is greater than the maximum allowable $1,400 for one child) but could not claim the full credit if they have three children (since .15($30,000 – $2,500) = $4,125 is less than the maximum allowable $1,400 x 3 = $4,200 for three children).

The Congressional Research Service estimates that about 1 in 5 taxpayers with eligible children fall into the phase-in range (i.e. they had incomes too low to receive the maximum credit). [14]

Temporary expansion in 2021

Expanded Child Tax Credit
2021 Child Tax Credit Married Filing Jointly.png
Expanded child tax credit (CTC) for married households filing jointly
2021 Child Tax Credit Unmarried Head of Household.png
Expanded child tax credit (CTC) for unmarried heads of households

The child tax credit was substantially expanded for one year under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP), a stimulus bill passed during the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The ARP increased the credit to $3,600 per child under the age of 6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 6 and 17 (note that it increased the maximum age for an eligible child from 16 to 17). More specifically, it increased the tax credit to $3,600/$3,000 per child for single filers with incomes below $75,000, for unmarried heads of households with incomes below $112,500, and for married joint filers with incomes below $150,000. The credit phases down to a $2,000 credit (the value of the TCJA CTC) above these income levels, remains at $2,000 until income reaches $200,000 for single filers and unmarried heads of households or $400,000 for married joint filers, and then phases down to $0. [16]

The ARP also made the credit fully refundable (i.e. it eliminated the income threshold and phase-in, making the credit fully available to people with very low incomes) and offered the option of receiving half of the credit as advance monthly payments, with the other half received as a tax refund when filing taxes in early 2022. Full refundability made the full value of the credit available to lower-income families, who previously tended to receive little or no benefit. [e] [16]

Post-2025

The child tax credit as it is scheduled to exist post-2025 US Child Tax Post-2025.png
The child tax credit as it is scheduled to exist post-2025

The $2,000 child tax credit instituted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) is scheduled to expire in 2025. Unless extended, the credit will revert to the CTC made permanent by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA). Under the ATRA, the CTC is a $1,000 non-refundable credit that begins to phase out at a rate of $50 for every $1,000 of income above $75,000 for single filers and unmarried heads of households or $110,000 for married couples filing jointly. [14]

Families receiving less than the non-refundable $1,000 child tax credit will be eligible for the $1,000 refundable additional child tax credit (ACTC). The ACTC has a refundability threshold of $3,000 (i.e. families must make at least $3,000 to claim the credit) and phases in at a rate of 15% of earned income above $3,000. [11] The sum of the ACTC and CTC claimed by a taxpayer cannot exceed the maximum credit of $1,000.

The child and dependent care credit allows eligible taxpayers to subtract $3,000 per child from their taxes for certain childcare services, capped at a total of $6,000 annually per taxpayer. [17] The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 created an additional dependent credit, allowing families to claim an additional $500 for an aging parent or older child requiring special care. [18]

Comparison chart

The below chart displays the differences between the three forms of the child tax credit explained above for joint filers. Comparison-all.png

Eligibility

The child tax credit is available to taxpayers who have a "qualifying child." A person is a "qualifying child" if they are under the age of 17 (or, in 2021, under the age of 18) at the end of the taxable year and meets the requirements of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 152(c). In general, a qualifying child is any individual for whom the taxpayer can claim a dependency exemption and who is the taxpayer's son or daughter (or descendant of either), stepson or stepdaughter (or descendant of either), or eligible foster child. For unmarried couples or married couples filing separately, a qualifying child will be treated as such for the purpose of the CTC for the taxpayer who is the child's parent, or if not a parent, the taxpayer with the highest adjusted gross income (AGI) for the taxable year in accordance with 26 U.S.C. Sec. 152(c)(4)(A).

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 restricted the credit to only those dependent children possessing a Social Security Number (SSN); previously, dependents who did not possess a SSN because of their immigration status could still be eligible for the credit using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). [19]

To receive the credit as a refund there are income requirements, see Overview.

Effects

The child tax credit—especially the fully-refundable 2021 expanded child tax credit—significantly reduces child poverty. [3] According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in 2018 the CTC, in conjunction with the earned income tax credit (EITC), lifted 5.5 million children above the poverty line. [20] A 2021 Columbia University study estimated that the expansion of the CTC instituted by the American Rescue Plan Act reduced child poverty by an additional 26%, and would have decreased child poverty by 40% had all eligible households claimed the credit; [21] the same group found that in the first month after the expansion of the CTC expired, child poverty rose from 12.1% to 17%, a 41% increase representing 3.7 million children. [22] Additionally, changes to official poverty statistics understate the poverty alleviation effects of the child tax credit: the CTC does not raise the incomes of many poor families above the poverty line—and thus they do not appear in poverty reduction statistics—even though CTC benefits provide these families with substantial boosts in income. [23]

Research indicates that income from the CTC and EITC leads to improved educational outcomes for young children in low-income households and is associated with decreased child behavioral problems and significant increases in college attendance among high school seniors in low-income families. [7] [24] Studies on the 2021 expanded CTC determined that the additional benefits decreased food insufficiency by about 25%. [4] [5] [6] [f] Evidence on cash transfers, like the refundable portion of the CTC, shows that children in families receiving them have improved math and reading test scores, a higher likelihood of high school graduation, and a 1–2% increase in earnings in adulthood; [8] they also lead to "persistent" increases in parents' earned income. [8] Evidence on the earned income tax credit and cash transfer programs in other countries also indicates that cash benefits reduce the rate of violent crime. [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

Two surveys of people who claimed the 2021 expanded child tax credit, one by the United States Census Bureau and another by the University of Michigan in collaboration with Propel, a technology firm, found that most families used the monthly CTC payments to pay for basic needs like food, rent, school supplies, utilities, and clothing, as well as to reduce personal debt. [31] [32] [33] A survey by the American Enterprise Institute determined that lower income families were most likely to spend the benefit while higher-income families were most likely to save it. [34]

A study of the labor effects of the CTC from 2001 to 2016, which included a phase-in, determined that the CTC increased labor force participation by 9.6 percentage points among low-income parents of older children. [9] While some economic models predicted that the 2021 expansion of the CTC, which increased the credit value and eliminated the phase-in, would lead to modest negative employment effects relative to the prior CTC (while still having substantial anti-poverty effects), [35] [36] empirical research has indicated that, in the six-month period that monthly CTC payments were distributed, effects on employment and labor force participation were minimal. [37] [38]

History

Origins

The child tax credit was created in 1997 as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. [39] [40] Initially it was a $500-per-child (up to age 16) nonrefundable credit intended to provide tax relief to middle- and upper-middle-income families. The credit phased out for higher earners at a rate of $50 for every $1,000 in additional income over $110,000 for taxpayers filing as married joint, $75,000 for taxpayers filing as head of household, and $55,000 for taxpayers filing as married separate. While non-refundable for most families, it was refundable for families with more than three children (reduced by the amount of the taxpayer's alternative minimum tax). The credit was not indexed for inflation.

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA)

A number of significant changes were made to the child tax credit by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA), a signature piece of tax legislation during the George W. Bush presidency (the bill is often referred to as one of the two "Bush tax cuts"). According to Margot L. Crandall-Hollick, a specialist in public finance, the bill made four key alterations to the CTC: [39]

  1. It increased the maximum amount of the credit per child in scheduled increments until it reached $1,000 per child in 2010
  2. It made the credit refundable for families irrespective of size using the earned income formula (10% of a taxpayer's earned income in excess of $10,000, up to the maximum amount of the credit for that tax year, and scheduled to increase to 15% for tax years 2005 through 2010)
  3. It allowed the child tax credit to offset alternative minimum tax liability
  4. It temporarily repealed the prior law provision that reduced the refundable portion of the child tax credit by the amount of the AMT

All of these provisions were scheduled to expire at the end of 2010 (restrictions imposed by the rules of budget reconciliation, a special parliamentary procedure that allows expedited passage of certain budgetary legislation, often necessitates placing time limits on budget policies, even if legislators hope they will be made permanent).

Adjustments to EGTRRA

The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA) increased the size of the CTC to $1,000 for 2003 and 2004 (under EGTRRA, the credit would not have reached $1,000 until 2010). The Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 extended this amount through 2010. [41] The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 extended this $1,000 cap through the end of 2012. [42] The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, signed into law by President Barack Obama, made the $1,000 credit permanent. [43]

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA)

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), with efforts led by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Ivanka Trump, made three major changes to the CTC: [18]

  1. It doubled the amount per qualifying child to $2,000
  2. It made up to $1,400 of the credit refundable
  3. It increased income thresholds to make the CTC available to more families.

Before 2018, the full CTC was only available to single parents making less than $75,000 and families making less than $110,000 per year. The TCJA significantly increased these income thresholds to $200,000 for single parents and $400,000 for married couples filing jointly. Above these limits, the CTC is phased out at the rate of $50 for each additional $1,000 (or portion of $1,000) earned. [44]

Expansion Proposals

Comparison of the CTC proposed by the American Family Act of 2019 and the CTC under the Tax and Jobs Act of 2017 for a married couple filing jointly (depicts amount of credit per child) American Family Act CTC.png
Comparison of the CTC proposed by the American Family Act of 2019 and the CTC under the Tax and Jobs Act of 2017 for a married couple filing jointly (depicts amount of credit per child)

In 2017, Democratic senators Michael Bennet and Sherrod Brown proposed the American Family Act (AFA). [45] [46] The bill would have increased the child tax credit's refundable portion to $3,600 per child under age six and to $3,000 per child age six to 16, eliminated the income threshold and phase-in (opening up the credit to the lowest-income families), and made the credit a monthly rather than annual benefit. [45]

Researchers at Columbia University estimated that the AFA would have reduced child poverty by nearly half. [47] [48] However, with the House of Representatives and Senate under Republican control, the bill failed to advance. Bennet and Brown re-introduced a modified version of the bill in 2019, [g] [49] this time garnering 39 co-sponsors in the Senate and 186 in the House (all Democrats), [50] but it again failed to advance in the Republican-controlled Senate. [51] [52] The proposal did ultimately influence the expanded child tax credit included in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, however (see section below).

The Family Security Act. Displays benefits per child for joint filers. Family Security Act 2021.png
The Family Security Act. Displays benefits per child for joint filers.

The proposed inclusion of an expanded CTC in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARP) also spurred the creation of several alternative child benefit proposals. In February 2021, shortly after Joe Biden assumed the presidency and Democrats gained a narrow majority in the Senate, Republican Senator Mitt Romney released his "Family Security Act", a proposal to provide families with a yearly benefit of $3,000 per child ages 6–16 and $4,200 per child ages 0–5, with a maximum allowable benefit of $15,000 and the same phaseout structure as the CTC under the TCJA. [53] [54] Like the child tax credit expansion proposed in the American Family Plan and instituted by the ARP, the benefit would be delivered as monthly payments; additionally, it would also allow families to begin claiming the benefit four months before the expected birth date of their child. [54] Unlike the Democratic proposals, Romney's plan would have the benefit administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA) rather than the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [h] The child benefit under Romney's plan would be larger than that of the ARP (except for very large families, who would have their benefit capped under Romney's plan) and would substantially reduce child poverty, though to a lesser extent than the ARP because Romney's plan would be financed in part by substantially reducing the earned income tax credit for taxpayers with children and eliminating Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (as a result, the proposal would actually increase poverty among many single-parent families [55] [56] ). [57] Romney also proposed eliminating the state and local tax deduction (which primarily benefits wealthy households and has a negligible effect on child poverty) and the head of household tax filing status to raise revenue for the benefit. [53]

In April 2021, Republican Senator Josh Hawley introduced a related proposal called the "Parent Tax Credit" (PTC). [58] The PTC would have been a new, refundable tax credit of $6,000 annually for single parents with at least one child under the age 13 and $12,000 annually for married couples with at least one child under the age of 13 (the larger benefit for married couples was intended to act as a "marriage bonus" [59] ); the benefit would be paid out monthly (i.e. $500 per month for single parents and $1,000 per month for married couples). [60] It would have had a larger income threshold than the CTC, requiring parents to make at least $7,540 in income (the equivalent of 20 hours of work per week at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour) to claim the credit; it would have no income phase-out. Children would need to possess a Social Security number to qualify.

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021

Comparison of the expanded CTC and the CTC under the Tax and Jobs Act of 2017 for a married couple filing jointly (depicts amount of credit per child) Child tax credit ARP & TCJA Married.png
Comparison of the expanded CTC and the CTC under the Tax and Jobs Act of 2017 for a married couple filing jointly (depicts amount of credit per child)

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARP) of 2021, a stimulus bill advanced by Democratic lawmakers and signed into law by President Joe Biden in response to the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, expanded the child tax credit by allowing qualifying families to offset, for the 2021 tax year, $3,000 per child up to age 17 and $3,600 per child under age 6. The size of the benefit gradually diminished for single filers earning more than $75,000 per year, heads of households earning more than $112,500 per year, and married couples filing jointly making more than $150,000 a year. Additionally, it made the credit fully refundable, and half of the benefit was sent out to eligible households as monthly payments (i.e. it was delivered as 6 monthly payments + one lump-sum payment for the remaining half of the benefit). Full refundability made the full value of the credit available to lower-income families, who previously tended to receive little or no benefit. [e] [16]

39 million households covering 88% of children in the United States began receiving payments automatically on July 15, 2021. [61] A Columbia University study estimated that the expanded CTC reduced child poverty by 26 percent. [3] The expanded CTC expired on December 31, 2021. [62]

Build Back Better Act and Family Security Act 2.0

Effects of the Build Back Better Act on the child tax credit US Child Tax Credit Build Back Better Act.png
Effects of the Build Back Better Act on the child tax credit

The Build Back Better Act, passed by the House of Representatives on November 19, 2021, [63] would extend the expansion of the CTC made by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 for one year. [64] Significantly, it would also make the full-refundability of the CTC permanent (i.e. it would permanently eliminate the earned income threshold and phase-in, so that low-income families can access the full value of the credit). [19] The bill stalled in the Senate [65] and was ultimately replaced by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which did not include an expansion to the child tax credit.

Family Security Act (FSA) 2.0
Family Security Act 2.0.png
Family Security Act 2.0
Family Security Act 2.0 Phase-In.png
More rapid phase-in

On June 15, 2022, Senator Mitt Romney, along with Senators Richard Burr and Steve Daines, introduced the Family Security Act 2.0 (FSA 2.0), a modification of Romney's earlier plan. [66] Like his earlier plan, the FSA 2.0 would substantially raise the child benefit relative to the existing child tax credit. [67] However, the FSA 2.0 includes a $10,000 income phase-in (i.e. a family must make at least $10,000 to qualify for the full benefit) and retains the substantial reductions to the earned income tax credit from his earlier plan, which would result in many low and moderate income single families seeing their combined benefits cut under the plan. [68]

Criticism

Lower benefits for low-income people

The child tax credit has been criticized for excluding low income-families—who are in most desperate need of financial assistance and who reap the largest relative gain in income from the benefit—from obtaining the full benefit or even any of the benefit. [69] [70] [71] [72] Under the current CTC, very low-income families making less than $2,500 receive no benefit and low-income families with incomes above $2,500 are subjected to a 15% phase-in. As a result, about one-in-five families with eligible children have incomes too low to receive the full credit. [14] Furthermore, according to Columbia University's Center on Poverty and Social Policy, over 50% of black and Hispanic children are in families with incomes too low to receive the full benefit and nearly 1-in-5 black children are in families with incomes too low to receive any of the credit. [73]

Excluding the poorest families from the full benefit substantially reduces the poverty alleviation effects of the CTC: the Jain Family Institute, for instance, estimates that making the child tax credit fully refundable—without any change to benefit levels—would reduce child poverty by 19%. [23]

Complexity

Child tax credit complexity
TCJA CTC Complexity.png
The interaction between the refundable additional child tax credit and nonrefundable child tax credit can be confusing to taxpayers.
US 2021 CTC HOH Multiple Children.png
The phase-out structure of the 2021 expanded child tax credit can be confusing to taxpayers.

The child tax credit has been criticized for its complexity. In many countries, a simple monthly child allowance is sent to all families. [74] In the United States, by contrast, the CTC has a complicated structure: it includes an income threshold, a phase-in formula, a separate phase-out formula, and mixes reduction of tax liability with direct payments. The 2021 expansion scrapped the income threshold and phase-in, but has a more complicated phase-out structure: it first phases down to a $2,000 plateau and then at higher incomes phases down to $0; the phase-out structure also differs depending on the number of qualifying children (see chart). [57] [75]

The CTC also interacts with other tax credits in ways that may be confusing to claimers. Many families can simultaneously claim the child tax credit, the earned income tax credit and the child and dependent care tax credit—each with its own set of eligibility rules—and may find it difficult to understand how these programs interact with each other or even which programs they are eligible for. [76] The large number of tax benefits also makes tax forms long and confusing. [77] According to the US Treasury: [78]

[E]ligibility rules for refundable credits are complex and lead to high improper payment rates...[R]ules differ by credit and are complex because they must address complicated family relationships and residency arrangements to determine eligibility...The complexity of the rules causes taxpayers to erroneously claim the credits. Much of the complexity that leads to errors stems from claims involving qualifying children. This is because of the intricacy of the rules regarding who can claim a child in instances of divorce, separation, and three-generation families. The complexity of these rules increases compliance burden for taxpayers and administrative costs for the IRS...Our analysis of EITC and ACTC eligibility rules found that the qualifying child relationship rules are difficult to understand. In addition, the definition of key eligibility requirements is different between the two credits. This can cause confusion for taxpayers when trying to determine which credit(s) they are eligible to claim.

Administered through tax code

The child tax credit is a tax expenditure, i.e. a social benefit administered through the tax code. Accordingly, it is delivered as most tax breaks are: as a reduction in the amount of taxes a taxpayer owes to the government or, for the refundable portion, as a lump-sum payment delivered at the end of the tax year (the temporary expansion of the CTC for the year 2021, however, allowed beneficiaries to receive half of the CTC as a series of six monthly payments, with the other half delivered as a lump-sum payment at the end of 2021). A number of scholars and political commentators have argued that a monthly child allowance (a simple direct cash payment to parents) would be more effective than the CTC at easing the costs of childcare and reducing child poverty. [79] [80] [81]

One reason for this focuses on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) inability to deliver benefits to all eligible households, particularly low-income households. [82] This became especially acute during the temporary expansion of the CTC in 2021, which made the lowest income families eligible for the full benefit for the first time (prior to the change, the CTC had an income threshold and phase-in, so administrative problems affecting low-income families were less substantial for the simple reason that many low-income families were ineligible for the benefit). To determine eligibility, the IRS uses taxpayers' tax returns. Many low-income households, however, are not required to file tax returns. [83] [84] As a result, many eligible low-income families may not receive the CTC despite being eligible for it. [85]

The IRS attempted to remedy this by offering an online non-filer sign-up tool. However, that, too, has been criticized. It was derided for being poorly designed: the website, designed in conjunction with Intuit through the Free File Alliance, [86] was not mobile friendly, contained little indication that it was an official government portal (it used a .com rather than .gov domain name, for instance), and was only available in English. [87] [88] [89] To log in to the website, users faced a number of requirements that ordinary taxpayers do not have to satisfy when filing their tax returns, including providing an email address, receiving a log-in code on their phone, scanning a photo ID, and taking a picture of themselves with a computer or smartphone (which is run through facial recognition software)—all administrative burdens that make completing the online form more difficult, particularly for low-income families. [90] (The Biden White House collaborated later that year with Code for America to create a more accessible website). [91] [92] Critics also noted that relying on non-filers to sign up online fails to accommodate people without access to the internet, which especially impacts low-income people (according to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), more than one in six people in poverty do not have internet access in their home [93] )—precisely the group that is most likely not to file and the group that reaps the greatest relative gain in income from the refundable CTC. [87]

See also

Notes

  1. As described by the Tax Foundation, a tax credit is refundable if it "can be used to generate a federal tax refund larger than the amount of tax paid". [1] In other words, if the value of a refundable tax credit is larger than the amount of tax owed, the taxpayer receives the difference as a tax refund. The current CTC is only partially refundable because only $1,400 of the $2,000 credit can be refunded.
  2. A refundability threshold, also sometimes called an earned income threshold, is the minimum amount of income a taxpayer must make to qualify for the refundable portion of the credit. Under the CTC's current structure, that threshold is $2,500. Above the refundability threshold, the credit phases in, i.e. more of the credit is made available to taxpayers as their income increases, up to the maximum credit amount. The current CTC phases in at 15%, meaning that for every $100 of income above the refundability threshold the taxpayer becomes eligible for $15 more of the refundable credit. See Overview.
  3. The full credit value was made refundable and the phase-in was eliminated.
  4. Source for this section: Sherlock, Molly F.; Hutchinson, Jamie (October 14, 2020). "The U.S. Individual Tax System, 2020". Congressional Research Service . Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved September 18, 2022.
  5. 1 2 In practice, however, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) faced a number of administrative difficulties when determining eligibility for the CTC, which reduced the number of low-income households who received the credit. See Criticism: Administrative difficulties section.
  6. Reducing food insufficiency, along with ensuring people have sufficient food for themselves, has also been found to reduce the incidence of severe mental distress among parents. [25]
  7. The 2019 bill would also have reduced the age of eligibility from 18 to 16, removed the requirement added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that dependents have a Social Security number to qualify for the CTC (which made non-citizen children ineligible) and raised the phase-out income threshold compared to the 2017 version of the bill (which would have lowered the phase-out income threshold, as well as increased the rate the credit phases out, compared to the CTC instituted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, reducing the number of high- and upper-middle income households who could claim the credit). [49] [48]
  8. Having the Social Security Administration (SSA) administer the benefit rather than the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) would alleviate many of the administrative problems that beleaguered the 2021 expanded child tax credit. See Administrative difficulties.

Related Research Articles

A tax credit is a tax incentive which allows certain taxpayers to subtract the amount of the credit they have accrued from the total they owe the state. It may also be a credit granted in recognition of taxes already paid or a form of state "discount" applied in certain cases. Another way to think of a tax credit is as a rebate.

Child benefit or children's allowance is a social security payment which is distributed to the parents or guardians of children, teenagers and in some cases, young adults. Countries operate different versions of the benefit. In most child benefit is means-tested and the amount paid is usually dependent on the number of children.

A tax cut represents a decrease in the amount of money taken from taxpayers to go towards government revenue. Tax cuts decrease the revenue of the government and increase the disposable income of taxpayers. Tax cuts usually refer to reductions in the percentage of tax paid on income, goods and services. As they leave consumers with more disposable income, tax cuts are an example of an expansionary fiscal policy. Tax cuts also include reduction in tax in other ways, such as tax credit, deductions and loopholes.

A child tax credit (CTC) is a tax credit for parents with dependent children given by various countries. The credit is often linked to the number of dependent children a taxpayer has and sometimes the taxpayer's income level. For example, with the Child Tax Credit in the United States, only families making less than $400,000 per year may claim the full CTC. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, the tax credit is only available for families making less than £42,000 per year.

The Canada Child Benefit (CCB), previously the Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB), is an income-tested income support program for Canadian families. It is delivered as a tax-free monthly payment available to eligible Canadian families to help with the cost of raising children. The CCTB could incorporate the National Child Benefit (NCB), a monthly benefit for low-income families with children, and the Child Disability Benefit (CDB), a monthly benefit for families caring for children with severe and prolonged mental or physical disabilities.

Dividend imputation is a corporate tax system in which some or all of the tax paid by a company may be attributed, or imputed, to the shareholders by way of a tax credit to reduce the income tax payable on a distribution. In comparison to the classical system, it reduces or eliminates the tax disadvantages of distributing dividends to shareholders by only requiring them to pay the difference between the corporate rate and their marginal tax rate. The imputation system effectively taxes distributed company profit at the shareholders' average tax rates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income tax in the United States</span> Form of taxation in the United States

The United States federal government and most state governments impose an income tax. They are determined by applying a tax rate, which may increase as income increases, to taxable income, which is the total income less allowable deductions. Income is broadly defined. Individuals and corporations are directly taxable, and estates and trusts may be taxable on undistributed income. Partnerships are not taxed, but their partners are taxed on their shares of partnership income. Residents and citizens are taxed on worldwide income, while nonresidents are taxed only on income within the jurisdiction. Several types of credits reduce tax, and some types of credits may exceed tax before credits. Most business expenses are deductible. Individuals may deduct certain personal expenses, including home mortgage interest, state taxes, contributions to charity, and some other items. Some deductions are subject to limits, and an Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) applies at the federal and some state levels.

Income tax in Australia is imposed by the federal government on the taxable income of individuals and corporations. State governments have not imposed income taxes since World War II. On individuals, income tax is levied at progressive rates, and at one of two rates for corporations. The income of partnerships and trusts is not taxed directly, but is taxed on its distribution to the partners or beneficiaries. Income tax is the most important source of revenue for government within the Australian taxation system. Income tax is collected on behalf of the federal government by the Australian Taxation Office.

Working Tax Credit (WTC) is a state benefit in the United Kingdom made to people who work and receive a low income. It was introduced in April 2003 and is a means-tested benefit. Despite the name, tax credits are not to be confused with tax credits linked to a person's tax bill, because they are used to top-up low wages. Unlike most other benefits, it is paid by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Income taxes in Canada constitute the majority of the annual revenues of the Government of Canada, and of the governments of the Provinces of Canada. In the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, the federal government collected just over three times more revenue from personal income taxes than it did from corporate income taxes.

In 2004, the New Zealand Labour government introduced the Working for Families package as part of the 2004 budget. The package, which effectively commenced operating on 1 April 2005, had three primary aims: to make work pay; to ensure income adequacy; and to support people "into work".

Head of Household is a filing status for individual United States taxpayers. It provides preferential tax rates and a larger standard deduction for single people caring for qualifying dependents.

Social security, in Australia, refers to a system of social welfare payments provided by Australian Government to eligible Australian citizens, permanent residents, and limited international visitors. These payments are almost always administered by Centrelink, a program of Services Australia. In Australia, most payments are means tested.

An adoption tax credit is a tax credit offered to adoptive parents to encourage adoption in the United States. Section 36C of the United States Internal Revenue code offers a credit for “qualified adoption expenses” paid or incurred by individual taxpayers.

The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 was an Act of Congress providing for several kinds of economic stimuli intended to boost the United States economy in 2008 and to avert a recession, or ameliorate economic conditions. The stimulus package was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on January 29, 2008, and in a slightly different version by the U.S. Senate on February 7, 2008. The Senate version was then approved in the House the same day. It was signed into law on February 13, 2008, by President George W. Bush with the support of both Democratic and Republican lawmakers. The law provides for tax rebates to low- and middle-income U.S. taxpayers, tax incentives to stimulate business investment, and an increase in the limits imposed on mortgages eligible for purchase by government-sponsored enterprises. The total cost of this bill was projected at $152 billion for 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earned income tax credit</span> Refundable tax credit for low-to-middle class individuals in the U.S.

The United States federal earned income tax credit or earned income credit is a refundable tax credit for low- to moderate-income working individuals and couples, particularly those with children. The amount of EITC benefit depends on a recipient's income and number of children. Low-income adults with no children are eligible. For a person or couple to claim one or more persons as their qualifying child, requirements such as relationship, age, and shared residency must be met.

The welfare trap theory asserts that taxation and welfare systems can jointly contribute to keep people on social insurance because the withdrawal of means-tested benefits that comes with entering low-paid work causes there to be no significant increase in total income. According to this theory, an individual sees that the opportunity cost of getting a better paying job is too great for too little a financial return, and this can create a perverse incentive to not pursue a better paying job.

Child benefits in the United Kingdom are a series of welfare payments and tax credits made to parents with children in the UK, a major part of the welfare state.

The premium tax credit (PTC) is a mechanism established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through which the United States federal government partially subsidizes the cost of private health insurance for certain lower- and middle-income individuals and families. The PTC is a refundable tax credit, and may be applied directly to the cost of insurance premiums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social Security Scotland</span> Agency of the Scottish Government

Social Security Scotland is an executive agency of the Scottish Government with responsibility for social security provision.

References

  1. "Refundable Tax Credit". Tax Foundation . Archived from the original on May 23, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
  2. M.S.R. (16 October 2017). "Why Ivanka Trump wants to extend the child tax credit". The Economist .
  3. 1 2 3 Parolin, Zachary; Collyer, Sophie; Curran, Megan A.; Wimer, Christopher (August 20, 2021). "Child poverty drops in July with the Child Tax Credit expansion" (PDF). Center on Policy and Social Policy. Columbia University. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 24, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  4. 1 2 Parolin, Zachary; Ananat, Elizabeth; Collyer, Sophie M.; Curran, Megan; Wimer, Christopher (September 2021). "The Initial Effects of the Expanded Child Tax Credit on Material Hardship". National Bureau of Economic Research . Working Paper Series. doi: 10.3386/w29285 . S2CID   239118407.
  5. 1 2 Shafer, Paul R.; Gutiérrez, Katherine M; Ettinger de Cuba, Stephanie; Bovell-Ammon, Allison; Raifman, Julia (January 13, 2022). "Association of the Implementation of Child Tax Credit Advance Payments With Food Insufficiency in US Households". Journal of the American Medical Association . 5 (1): e2143296. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43296. PMC   8759005 . PMID   35024837. S2CID   245906857 via JAMA Network.
  6. 1 2 Perez-Lopez, Daniel J. (August 11, 2021). "Economic Hardship Declined in Households With Children as Child Tax Credit Payments Arrived". United States Census Bureau . Archived from the original on September 13, 2022.
  7. 1 2 Marr, Chuck; Huang, Chye-Ching; Sherman, Arloc; DeBot, Brandon (October 1, 2015). "EITC and Child Tax Credit Promote Work, Reduce Poverty, and Support Children's Development, Research Finds" (PDF). Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived (PDF) from the original on November 27, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  8. 1 2 3 Barr, Andrew; Eggleston, Jonathan; Smith, Alexander A (April 20, 2022). "Investing in Infants: the Lasting Effects of Cash Transfers to New Families" . Quarterly Journal of Economics . 137 (4). NBER working paper available for free at "Investing in Infants: The Lasting Effects of Cash Transfers to New Families". doi:10.1093/qje/qjac023 via Oxford Academic.
  9. 1 2 Lippold, Kyle (March 19, 2020). "The Effects of the Child Tax Credit on Labor Supply" . Social Science Research Network . doi:10.2139/ssrn.3543751. S2CID   219382779. SSRN   3543751.
  10. Kidd, Andrew. "The Effect of the Child Tax Credit on the Labor Supply of Mothers". University of Notre Dame . Archived from the original on June 12, 2022.
  11. 1 2 Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. (November 1, 2021). "The Expanded Child Tax Credit for 2021: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)". Congressional Research Service . Archived from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
  12. "2023 Instructions for Schedule 8812 (2023) | Internal Revenue Service".
  13. "Child Tax Credit: For use in preparing 2017 Returns" (PDF). Internal Revenue Service . January 23, 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 9, 2021. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. (August 28, 2020). "The Child Tax Credit: Selected Legislative Proposals in the 116th Congress". Congressional Research Service . Archived from the original on September 23, 2021. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
  15. "What's new with the child tax credit after tax reform". Internal Revenue Service . November 27, 2018. Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
  16. 1 2 3 Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. (May 12, 2021). "The Child Tax Credit: Temporary Expansion for 2021 Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA; P.L. 117-2)". Congressional Research Service . Archived from the original on November 9, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  17. "Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit for 2018, 2019". American Tax Service. 2018-12-11. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  18. 1 2 CFP, Matthew Frankel (2018-01-09). "The 2018 Child Tax Credit Changes: What You Need to Know -". The Motley Fool. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  19. 1 2 Marr, Chuck; Cox, Kris; Sherman, Arloc (November 11, 2021). "Build Back Better's Child Tax Credit Changes Would Protect Millions From Poverty — Permanently". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  20. Marr, Chuck; Cox, Kris; Hingtgen, Stephanie; Windham, Katie (May 24, 2021). "Congress Should Adopt American Families Plan's Permanent Expansions of Child Tax Credit and EITC, Make Additional Provisions Permanent". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  21. Parolin, Zachary; Collyer, Sophie; Curran, Megan A.; Wimer, Christopher (August 20, 2021). "Monthly Poverty Rates among Children after the Expansion of the Child Tax Credit" (PDF). Poverty and Social Policy Brief. 5 (4). Archived (PDF) from the original on April 14, 2022.
  22. Parolin, Zachary; Collyer, Sophie; Curran, Megan A. (February 17, 2022). "Absence of Monthly Child Tax Credit Leads to 3.7 Million More Children in Poverty in January 2022" (PDF). Center on Poverty & Social Policy. Columbia University. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 15, 2022. Retrieved September 15, 2022.
  23. 1 2 Landry, Jack; Nuñez, Stephen (October 28, 2021). "Analysis of Full Refundability of the Child Tax Credit Without Expansion" (PDF). Jain Family Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved September 18, 2022.
  24. Rostad, Whitney L.; Klevens, Joanne; Ports, Katie A.; Ford, Derek C. (February 2020). "Impact of the United States federal child tax credit on childhood injuries and behavior problems". Children and Youth Services Review . 109. Earlier version of paper available for free through National Library of Medicine at "Impact of the United States federal child tax credit on childhood injuries and behavior problems". doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104718. PMC   7176404 . PMID   32322131.
  25. Schmidt, Lucie; Shore-Sheppard, Lara; Watson, Tara (September 2021). "The Effect of Safety Net Generosity on Maternal Mental Health and Risky Health Behaviors". National Bureau of Economic Research . Working Paper Series. doi: 10.3386/w29258 . S2CID   239285438.
  26. Lenhart, Otto (February 3, 2021). "Earned income tax credit and crime" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy . 39 (3): 589–607. doi:10.1111/coep.12522. S2CID   230534499 via Wiley.
  27. Machado, Daiane Borges; Rodrigues, Laura C.; Rasella, Davide; Barreto, Maurício Lima; Araya, Ricardo (December 2018). "Conditional cash transfer programme: Impact on homicide rates and hospitalisations from violence in Brazil". PLoS One . 13 (12): e0208925. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1308925M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208925 . PMC   6312285 . PMID   30596664.
  28. Meloni, Osvaldo (August 2014). "Does poverty relief spending reduce crime? Evidence from Argentina" (PDF). International Review of Law and Economics . 39: 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2014.05.002 via Science Direct.
  29. Lance, Justin Earl (2014). "Conditional Cash Transfers and the Effect on Recent Murder Rates in Brazil and Mexico" . Latin American Politics and Society. 56 (1): 55–72. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00221.x. S2CID   154285835.
  30. Hidrobo, Melissa; Peterman, Amber; Heise, Lori (July 2016). "The Effect of Cash, Vouchers, and Food Transfers on Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Northern Ecuador" (PDF). American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 8 (3): 284–303. doi:10.1257/app.20150048. S2CID   53351445 via American Economic Association.
  31. Washington, Kemberley (August 30, 2021). "How Monthly Child Tax Credit Payments Are Impacting Americans' Finances". Forbes . Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  32. "Week 35 Household Pulse Survey: August 4 – August 16". United States Census Bureau . August 25, 2021.
  33. Pilkauskas, Natasha; Cooney, Patrick (October 6, 2021). "Receipt and Usage of Child Tax Credit Payments Among Low-Income Families: What We Know". Poverty Solutions. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on November 18, 2021. Retrieved December 17, 2021.
  34. Rachidi, Angela (October 18, 2021). "New Survey Data Raises Questions About the Expanded Child Tax Credit". American Enterprise Institute . Archived from the original on December 3, 2021.
  35. Corinth, Kevin; Meye, Bruce D.; Stadnicki, Matthew; Wu, Derek (October 2021). "The Anti-Poverty, Targeting, and Labor Supply Effects of the Proposed Child Tax Credit Expansion" (PDF). Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics . University of Chicago. doi:10.3386/w29366. S2CID   238633007. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 11, 2022.
  36. Bastian, Jacob (June 12, 2022). "Investigating How a Permanent Child Tax Credit Expansion Would Affect Poverty and Employment". Personal upload to Google Drive by Rutgers University economist Jacob Bastian.
  37. Ananat, Elizabeth; Glasner, Benjamin; Hamilton, Christal; Parolin, Zachary (March 2022). "Effects of the Expanded Child Tax Credit on Employment Outcomes: Evidence from Real-World Data from April to December 2021". National Bureau of Economic Research . Working Paper Series. doi: 10.3386/w29823 .
  38. Roll, Stephen; Hamilton, Leah; Chun, Yung (October 2021). "Expanded Child Tax Credit Payments Have Not Reduced Employment: Evidence from Census Data" (PDF). Social Policy Institute. Washington University in St. Louis. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 31, 2022.
  39. 1 2 Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. (March 1, 2018). "The Child Tax Credit: Legislative History" (PDF). Congressional Research Service . Archived (PDF) from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  40. Greenstein, Robert (2023). "The 2021 Child Tax Credit in U.S. Historical Context". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 710 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1177/00027162241258853. ISSN   0002-7162.
  41. "NYSSCPA | The New York State Society of CPAs". www.nysscpa.org. Archived from the original on 2013-05-06. Retrieved 2016-09-03.
  42. "TAX RELIEF, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REAUTHORIZATION, AND JOB CREATION ACT OF 2010". gpo.gov. Retrieved 2016-09-02.
  43. Nunns, James R.; Rohaly, Jeffrey (2013-01-08). "Tax Provisions in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA)". Tax Policy Center. Retrieved 2016-09-03.
  44. "Child Tax Credit" (PDF). irs.gov. Internal Revenue Service. 2015-01-01. Retrieved 2016-09-02.
  45. 1 2 Matthews, Dylan (October 26, 2017). "Senate Democrats have a plan that would cut child poverty nearly in half". Vox . Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  46. "Bennet, Brown Introduce Major Proposal to Cut Taxes for Families with Children". Office of US Senator Michael Bennet. October 26, 2017. Archived from the original on September 19, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  47. Wimer, Christopher; Collyer, Sophie (October 24, 2017). "Expanding the Child Tax Credit would Cut Child Poverty Nearly in Half" (PDF). Poverty & Social Policy Brief. 1 (3). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2022 via Columbia University.
  48. 1 2 Matthews, Dylan (May 2, 2019). "Democrats have united around a plan to dramatically cut child poverty". Vox . Archived from the original on August 31, 2022.
  49. 1 2 Crandall-Hollick, Margot L. (March 26, 2019). "How Would the American Family Act Change the Child Tax Credit?" (PDF). Congressional Research Service . Archived (PDF) from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  50. Viard, Alan D.; Smith, Noah Blake (March 16, 2020). "The Child Tax Credit: Onward and upward?". American Enterprise Institute . Archived from the original on November 11, 2021. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  51. Bennet, Michael F. (2019-03-06). "S.690 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): American Family Act of 2019". www.congress.gov. Retrieved 2020-05-05.
  52. Wingerter, Justin (April 30, 2021). "How Colorado's senior senator Michael Bennet helped create a major anti-poverty program". The Denver Post . Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  53. 1 2 Rainey, Rebecca (February 4, 2021). "Romney proposes child care benefit for families, fueling Democrats' push". Politico .
  54. 1 2 "The Family Security Act" (PDF). Official Website of US Senator Mitt Romney. February 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 16, 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
  55. Marr, Chuck; Cox, Kris; Hingtgen, Stephanie; Sherman, Arloc; Calame, Sarah; Cook, Jabari (July 6, 2022). "Romney Child Tax Credit Proposal Is Step Forward But Falls Short, Targets Low-Income Families to Pay for It" (PDF). Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived (PDF) from the original on July 6, 2022.
  56. Ortigueira, Salvador; Siassib, Nawid (June 2022). "Income assistance, marriage, and child poverty: An assessment of the Family Security Act". Economic Modelling. 111: 105827. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105827. PMC   8919728 . PMID   35309015.
  57. 1 2 Matthews, Dylan (February 23, 2021). "What Democrats can learn from Mitt Romney". Vox . Archived from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  58. Zeballos-Roig, Joseph (April 26, 2021). "Sen. Josh Hawley wants to send $1,000 monthly checks to families with kids under 13 but provide less to single parents". Insider Inc. Archived from the original on April 30, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  59. Fordham, Evie (April 26, 2021). "Hawley proposes $12K tax credit for married parents with kids under 13". Fox News .
  60. "Senator Hawley Introduces Parent Tax Credit—Historic Relief for Working Families". Official Website of US Senator Josh Hawley. April 26, 2021. Archived from the original on November 12, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  61. "Treasury and IRS Announce Families of 88% of Children in the U.S. to Automatically Receive Monthly Payment of Refundable Child Tax Credit". IRS. Internal Revenue Service. 17 May 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021.
  62. Picchi, Aimee (February 24, 2022). "Child poverty surges after Child Tax Credit payments end". CBS News . Archived from the original on March 19, 2022.
  63. Cochrane, Emily; Weisman, Jonathan (November 19, 2021). "House Narrowly Passes Biden's Social Safety Net and Climate Bill". The New York Times . Archived from the original on April 9, 2022.
  64. Siegal, Rachel (November 19, 2021). "How the House spending bill changes the child tax credit". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on April 12, 2022.
  65. Tami Luhby (December 20, 2022). "Child tax credit enhancement fails to make it into federal spending bill". CNN . Retrieved August 2, 2024. Though the child tax credit has long enjoyed bipartisan backing, GOP lawmakers have been wary of making it fully refundable because they claim it could discourage parents from working.
  66. Olander, Daedan (June 15, 2022). "Sen. Mitt Romney announces plan to provide cash to working families. Here's how he'll pay for it". The Salt Lake Tribune . Archived from the original on June 15, 2022.
  67. McCabe, Joshua; Orr, Robert (June 15, 2022). "Analysis of the Family Security Act 2.0". Niskanen Center . Archived from the original on June 15, 2022.
  68. Marr, Chuck; Cox, Kris; Hingtgen, Stephanie; Sherman, Arloc; Calame, Sarah; Cook, Jabari (July 6, 2022). "Romney Child Tax Credit Proposal Is Step Forward But Falls Short, Targets Low-Income Families to Pay for It" (PDF). Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived (PDF) from the original on July 6, 2022.
  69. Greenstein, Robert; Maag, Elaine; Huang, Chye-Ching; Horton, Emily; Cho, Chloe (April 5, 2018). "Improving the Child Tax Credit for Very Low-Income Families". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  70. Maag, Elaine (July 30, 2018). "Who Benefits from Expanding the EITC or CTC?" (PDF). Urban Institute . Archived (PDF) from the original on September 19, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  71. Matthews, Dylan (April 27, 2017). "Child poverty in the US is a disgrace. Experts are embracing this simple plan to cut it". Vox . Archived from the original on August 15, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  72. Bruenig, Matt (February 19, 2021). "Oren Cass Wants Child Benefits for Everyone But the Poor". People's Policy Project . Archived from the original on June 6, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  73. Collyer, Sophie; Harris, David; Wimer, Christopher (May 13, 2019). "Left Behind: The One-Third of Children in Families Who Earn Too Little to Get the Full Child Tax Credit" (PDF). Poverty and Social Policy Brief. 3 (6). Archived (PDF) from the original on May 12, 2022 via Columbia University.
  74. "Family cash benefits" (PDF). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . July 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 21, 2021. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  75. Bruenig, Matt (February 8, 2021). "The Newest CTC Proposal Is Still a Mess". People's Policy Project . Archived from the original on November 11, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  76. Sawhill, Isabel V.; Welch, Morgan (May 27, 2021). "The American Families Plan: Too many tax credits for children?". Brookings Institution . Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  77. Hungerford, Thomas L.; Thiess, Rebecca (September 23, 2021). "The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit". Economic Policy Institute . Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  78. "Addressing Complex and Inconsistent Earned Income Tax Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit Rules May Reduce Unintentional Errors and Increase Participation" (PDF). US Treasury . September 23, 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
  79. Wunder, Timothy A. (May 13, 2019). "Fighting Childhood Poverty: How a Universal Child Allowance Would Impact the U.S. Population" . Journal of Economic Issues . 53 (2): 537–544. doi:10.1080/00213624.2019.1603769. S2CID   182473181 via Taylor & Francis.
  80. Shaefer, H. Luke; Collyer, Sophie; Duncan, Greg; Edin, Kathryn; Garfinkel, Irwin; Harris, David; Smeeding, Timothy M.; Waldfogel, Jane; Wimer, Christopher; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu (February 1, 2018). "A Universal Child Allowance: A Plan to Reduce Poverty and Income Instability Among Children in the United States". The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences. 4 (2): 22–42. doi: 10.7758/RSF.2018.4.2.02 . ISSN   2377-8253. PMC   6145823 . PMID   30246143.
  81. VerValin, Joe (October 5, 2018). "The Case for a Universal Child Allowance in the United States". Cornell Policy Review . Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved December 1, 2021.
  82. Birenbaum, Gabby (July 29, 2021). "How to make the child tax credit more accessible". Vox . Archived from the original on August 26, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  83. Cox, Kris; Caines, Roxy; Sherman, Arloc; Rosenbaum, Dottie (August 5, 2021). "State and Local Child Tax Credit Outreach Needed to Help Lift Hardest-to-Reach Children Out of Poverty". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived from the original on November 3, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  84. "What Could Have Been for the Child Benefit". People's Policy Project. 15 July 2021. Retrieved 2021-08-26.
  85. Maag, Elaine; Karpman, Michael (March 8, 2022). "Many Low-Income Families May Not Get the Full Child Tax Credit Because They Won't File A Tax Return". Tax Policy Center . Archived from the original on July 29, 2022.
  86. Zeballos-Roig, Joseph (June 29, 2021). "The IRS's child tax credit portal 'looks like crap and it's not really usable' for low-income Americans trying to get $300 monthly federal payments". Business Insider . Archived from the original on July 15, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  87. 1 2 Williams, Paul E. (June 18, 2021). "The Child Tax Credit Non-Filer Tool Is a Mess". People's Policy Project . Archived from the original on November 27, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  88. Golshan, Tara (June 18, 2021). "Democrats Have A Plan To Slash Child Poverty, But It Goes Through A Shoddy Website". HuffPost . Archived from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  89. LeBlanc, Cameron (July 19, 2021). "Why Many of the Poorest Parents Didn't Receive Their Child Tax Credit Payment". Fatherly . Archived from the original on July 21, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.
  90. Pilkauskas, Natasha; Cooney, Patrick (October 2021). "Receipt and Usage of the Child Tax Credit Payments Among Low-Income Families: What We Know" (PDF). Poverty Solutions. University of Michigan. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 13, 2021. Retrieved December 17, 2021.
  91. "Child Tax Credit for Non-Filers". whitehouse.gov . Archived from the original on September 2, 2021. Retrieved December 6, 2021.
  92. Gailey, Alex (September 9, 2021). "Child Tax Credit Payments Just Got Easier for More Americans to Sign Up For, Thanks to a New Online Tool". Time .
  93. Swenson, Kendall; Ghertner, Robin (March 2021). "People in Low-Income Households Have Less Access to Internet Services – 2019 Update" (PDF). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services . Archived (PDF) from the original on December 5, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2021.