Climate change in Montana

Last updated
Koppen climate types in Montana. Montana Koppen.png
Köppen climate types in Montana.

Climate change is negatively impacting the US state of Montana; climate change in Montana is causing common heat waves, earlier snow melts in the spring, and a high amount of dying trees due to droughts and forest fires. In many decades, climate change in Montana will most likely impact water availability, agricultural yields, and risks for wildfires. [1] State and local governments in Montana have taken legislative steps to mitigate the effects of climate change, such as establishing a renewable energy portfolio and creating climate action plans.

Contents

Impacts

An aircraft drops fire retardant on the 2021 Richard Spring Fire Aircraft drops fire retardant on the 2021 Richard Spring Fire in Montana, photo by Phil Millette, FWS.jpg
An aircraft drops fire retardant on the 2021 Richard Spring Fire
Barren wheatfield, Malta, July 2021 Barren wheatfield, Malta, Montana, July 2021.jpg
Barren wheatfield, Malta, July 2021

Water resources

Drought, cattle ranch in Fallon County, June 2021 Montana drought, aerial view, cattle ranch in Fallon County, MT. June 2021 (cropped).jpg
Drought, cattle ranch in Fallon County, June 2021

According to the IPCC, climate change's effects on water systems for the Montana region can decrease water availability in some areas. Climate change in mountain states is projected by the IPCC to cause decreased snowpack, more winter flooding, and reduced summer flows. These weather patterns may increase competition for water resources.

Montana is a headwater state, and consequently, potential climate change effects that impact Montana's water resources reach far beyond the state borders. The Department of Environmental Quality, Montana, has determined that climate change will affect essential water resources in Montana as water quality and ecosystems may be compromised when contaminants and sediment are carried by spring run-off at unnatural times. [2]

Wind turbines near Fairfield, May 2022 Wind turbines near near Fairfield, Montana, May 2022 (cropped).jpg
Wind turbines near Fairfield, May 2022

A report from the University of Lethbridge found climate change may alter stream flow and water supply volume by lowering snowpack which may cause low reservoir storage in the spring and dangerously low flows in the summer making perennial streams potentially intermittent. [3]

Drought on a cattle ranch, May 2022 Drought on a Montana cattle ranch, May 2022.jpg
Drought on a cattle ranch, May 2022

The Montana Wildlife Conservation Society is concerned that warming water may also change patterns of some species such as native bull trout require colder water than other fish and would have a difficult time surviving if waters warmed. [4]

Forest resources

Solar panels, Polebridge Bennett 000169 172466 517720 4578 (35949064464).jpg
Solar panels, Polebridge

Montana's forests sequester up to 23.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents annually—approximately 62 percent of the state's gross emissions. The state also contains 8.9 million acres thought suitable for afforestation with a potential sequestration capacity of up to 15 million metric tons. [5]

The impacts of climate change upon Montana's forests could result in feedback: assuming a shift to a 'drier' precipitation and temperature scenario, the sequestration capacity of Montana's high-elevation forests could be reduced or even eliminated entirely. [6]

Agriculture

Drought, Malta, July 2021 20210717-APHIS-LSC-0404 (51341776925).jpg
Drought, Malta, July 2021
Mitch Konen of the Montana Grain Growers Association speaking about drought, May 2022 Mitch Konen, Zach Ducheneaux. Fairfield, Montana.jpg
Mitch Konen of the Montana Grain Growers Association speaking about drought, May 2022

The effects of climate change on agriculture varies among regions. Montana's agricultural production may not change substantially over the short term according to the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. For instance, warmer temperatures reduce yield of wheat, but there will be a higher concentration of carbon dioxide which is favorable. [7] Warmer winters could lead to two crop cycles per year but also increase growth of weeds and pests. [7]

There are still issues Montana would face due to the warmer climate. These include reduction of crops that need cooler weather, introduction of diseases and pests that come from warmer climates, more severe storms and droughts. [8] As for cattle production, in warmer weather cows will eat less and grow more slowly. [7] Livestock also faces heat stress and the spread of parasites.

Human health

Smoke pollution from wildfire, 2017 20170921-FSA-UNK-0010 (36583423523).jpg
Smoke pollution from wildfire, 2017
Wildfire, Bitterroot River, 2000 Deerfire high res.jpg
Wildfire, Bitterroot River, 2000

Adverse health impacts from climate change have already been documented, and are expected to increase during the twenty-first century. [9] Montanans will experience health impacts from increased temperatures and decreased stream flows that are similar to those in other parts of the country. [10] Decreased summer stream flows will lead to heavier concentrations of pollutants including toxic metals, microbes and nutrients. [10] Higher temperatures and increased forest fires will adversely affect air quality, increasing incidences[ spelling? ] of asthma, lung and heart disease. [10] On average, climate change has already extended the allergy season by 20 days annually since 1950. [10]

State adaptation and mitigation

Renewables

Solar-powered pump, Arbuckle Ranch, Alzada Solar-powered pump, Arbuckle Ranch, Alzada, Montana (cropped).jpg
Solar-powered pump, Arbuckle Ranch, Alzada

In April, 2005, Montana established a renewable energy portfolio which requires all public utilities to derive at least 15% of their electricity from renewable energy resources by 2015. [11] Part of Montana's renewable energy development plan is to stimulate rural economic development by requiring public utilities to buy renewable energy credits and electricity generated by community-based energy utility companies. From 2010 to 2014, public utility companies in Montana must purchase 50 MW from these rural community-based utility companies. Beginning in 2015, that figure will grow to 75 MW. Any utility company serving more than 5,000 people is required to create a renewable energy standard which promotes renewable energy development, with specific emphasis on rural economic development. [12]

Currently, Montana's renewable energy is derived primarily from wind energy, geothermal energy and solar energy. Montana offers many tax incentives and loan programs for individuals and businesses to promote renewable energy development at all levels in both the private and the public sector. [13] This renewable-energy promoting legislation includes production incentives, utility grants and loans, a green power program, property tax exemptions, and production tax reductions.

In 2009, Montana received $10.3 million in federal Recovery Act funding to improve the energy efficiency of state buildings and expand renewable energy use and recycling infrastructure in the state. The funds will also be used for grants to encourage use of new clean energy technologies that have moved into the production phase but are not yet well known or utilized in the state. Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) will also extend low-interest loans to consumers, businesses, and nonprofit organizations to install various renewable energy systems, including wind, solar, geothermal, hydro and biomass. [14]

Wind

Wind turbines, Martinsdale Hutterite colony in Martinsdale Montana (cropped).jpg
Wind turbines, Martinsdale

Montana is ranked among the top five states in the nation for wind power generation potential. As of 2009, Montana produced 820,924 MWh of wind-generated electricity, which represented more than three percent of all electricity generated in Montana that year. [11] Montana is ranked first in the nation for wind speed of class 3 and above, with the majority of wind sites located in areas of low population, near communities that favor wind energy development. [15] Montana Department of Environmental Quality maintains monitoring data from current wind-powered facilities and provides that data to people who are interested in wind energy investment opportunities in the state. [16] The Energy Promotion and Development Division "facilitates a wind and transmission working group that consists of industry, government, academic and other stakeholders. The group has been meeting quarterly since April 2008 and it convenes to identify obstacles to transmission and wind development and to develop strategies to overcome those obstacles." [17]

Large-scale wind farms in Montana currently include Glacier wind farm near Shelby, Judith Gap wind farm in Wheatland County, Diamond Willow wind farm near Baker, MT, and Horseshoe Bend Wind Park near Great Falls. [18] Detailed wind power maps are available on MDEQ's official site. [19]

Geothermal In May, 2005, the State of Montana, Department of Energy (DOE) and Sage Resources of Missoula, Montana established the Montana Geothermal Program. Montana's potential for large-scale geothermal energy development is still being evaluated. [20] DOE's Geopowering the West program indicates that Montana has more than 25,000 square miles of high-potential sites and areas. [21]

Currently, Montana has 15 high-temperature sites located near White Sulphur Springs, Helena, Ennis, Bozeman, Butte and Boulder, and more than 50 designated geothermal areas of varying temperatures across the entire state. A total of twenty-seven known sites have surface temperatures ranging from 110 °F to above 149 °F, and current temperature estimates for deep reservoirs exceed 350 °F. An interactive topographic map providing details about Montana's principal geothermal sites is available on MDEQ's official site. [22]

Solar

Solar installation, Glacier National Park Solar installation, Glacier National Park.jpg
Solar installation, Glacier National Park

Currently, most of Montana's solar energy projects are undertaken at the residential or small-scale municipal level in homes, ranches, schools, community buildings and business. The feasibility of larger-scale solar energy generation facilities in Montana continues to be researched. Eastern Montana receives an annual average of 5 hours of full sun, and western Montana receives an annual average of 4.2 hours, so Montana has adequate solar resources to support more widespread development of solar energy in the future. [23]

The State of Montana currently offers numerous tax incentives and revolving loan programs to encourage solar energy development projects. Details of those programs can also be found on MDEQ's official site. [24]

Local government

Tesla Supercharger installation, 2022 Missoula (MT, USA), Tesla Supercharger -- 2022 -- 194228.jpg
Tesla Supercharger installation, 2022

In 2007, Montana published its comprehensive Climate Change Action Plan and became the seventh U.S. state to join the Western Climate Initiative (WCI). Shortly thereafter, numerous local governments across the state began to develop formal climate change policies and greenhouse gas emission standards to be implemented at the local level. The standards published in the local climate change action plans are largely patterned after Montana's comprehensive Climate Change Action Plan. [25]

In 2009, Helena issued its community climate action plan. [26]

In 2011, Bozeman released its final climate action plan [27] and so did Missoula County. [28]

Additionally, Montana State University and University of Montana also issued climate change action plans for the campus communities. [29] [30]

In late 2011, Missoula County's Clark Fork Coalition began the process of developing climate action strategies as well. [31]

In 2018, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes began a comprehensive climate adaptation planning process. [32]

In 2018, the City of Red Lodge adopted an Energy Conservation Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 50% of 2016 levels by 2040. [33]

Otter Creek

Background

In the mid 1990s the federal government purchased a large tract of property neighboring Yellowstone National Park in order to prevent a proposed gold mine from being developed on the land. [34] As a result of the land transaction, Montana stood to lose substantial revenue from mining royalties and requested that the state be compensated for the loss. [34] After a period of negotiation the federal government agreed to transfer its ownership in the Otter Creek coal tracts to the state. [34] The Tracts were located in south eastern Montana, in an area rich with coal but largely undeveloped. [35] At the time of the sale, the Tracts were surrounded by a checkerboard pattern of private property owned by a large real estate company; Great Northern Properties. [34] Several years after Montana took ownership of the Tracts, Great Northern Properties sold its interest in the surrounding properties to Arch Coal, Inc., the second largest coal developed in the United States. [34]

In 2009, the Montana State Land Board, the body responsible for deciding how Montana's state lands will be managed, voted to seek bids from development companies interested in the Otter Creek Tracts. [34] After the initial bidding period ended with no bids received, the Land Board lowered the price per ton and resubmitted the Tracts for bidding. Arch Coal was the only bidder for the Otter Creek Tracts [34] In March 2010, the Land Board voted 3–2 to accept Arch Coal's bid for the Tracts. [36]

Litigation

In reaching its decision to lease the Tracts, the Land Board was not required, under state statute, to consider any environmental impacts or consequences that would result from the proposed mine. [37] After the Land Board approved the leases, Northern Plains Resource Council and other conservation groups filed suit in the Sixteenth Judicial District in Broadus, Montana. [38] The groups argued in court documents that the Land Board did not consider the impacts on climate change that the new mine would have and that the Land Board did not consider a single alternative to the full development of the mine, as required by the Montana Environmental Policy Act. [38] Montana moved the court to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that lacked legal standing to challenge the Land Board's decision, that the Montana Environmental Policy Act did not apply to decisions of the Land Board, and that the statute allowing the Land Board to not consider any environmental impacts was constitutional. [39] After hearing argument on the issues, the court denied Montana's dismissal of the suit and allowed the case to proceed on the merits. [39] As of November 2011, the case is still being litigated in the Sixteenth Judicial District.

Lawsuits

Climate change trust litigation

In May, 2011, several parents filed suit on behalf of their minor children in the Montana Supreme Court. [40] The parents argued that the atmosphere was a public resource held in trust by Montana for the benefit Montana citizens, and that the state had an affirmatively duty to protect that resource from harms like climate change. [40] The petition to the Montana Supreme Court listed many climate change related impacts that were occurring within the state and argued that "public trust" was impacted by these changes. [40]

Initially, the state did not respond to the lawsuit filed by the parents. [41] The Montana Supreme Court however, ordered the state Attorney General’s office to respond to the petition. [41] When the state Attorney General’s office did respond, they did not attack the merits of the parents’ argument but rather challenged the procedural posture of the case. [42] The parents had filed their case under the "original jurisdiction" of the Montana Supreme Court, rather than an appeal. [40] The original jurisdiction of the Montana Supreme Court was limited by the Montana Constitution. [40] The Attorney General's office argued that the parents had failed to establish that the case fell within the bounds of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction and argued that the high Court deny the petition in favor of the normal, lower court process. [42]

The Supreme Court agreed with the Attorney General's office and dismissed the petition for original jurisdiction. [43] The Court stated that the complexity of the case and the amount of factual determinations that had to be made were better suited for a fact-finding lower court, rather than the state's high court. [43]

Held v. Montana

Plaintiffs in Held v Montana Held v Montana plaintiffs, Our Children's Trust.jpg
Plaintiffs in Held v Montana

Held v. Montana is the first constitutional law climate lawsuit to go to trial in the United States. [44] The case was filed in March 2020 by sixteen youth residents of Montana, then aged 2 through 18. [45] [46]

The plaintiffs argued that the state's support of the fossil fuel industry had worsened the effects of climate change on their lives, thus denying their right to a "clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations" [47] :Art. IX, § 1 as required by the Constitution of Montana. [44] [48] In the trial, held in June 2023, the plaintiffs challenged a law that prohibited the state from considering greenhouse gas emissions as a factor when deciding whether to issue permits for energy-related projects. [49] [50] On August 14, 2023, the trial court judge ruled in the youth plaintiffs' favor, though the state indicated it would appeal the decision. [51] Montana's Supreme Court heard oral arguments on July 10, 2024, its seven justices taking the case under advisement. [52]

Statutes

In May 2023, Republican lawmakers passed a law—possibly the nation’s most aggressive anti-climate action law—prohibiting state agencies from considering climate change impacts when considering permits for projects like coal mines and fuel power plants. [53] A decade-old state law already prohibited the state from considering "actual or potential impacts that are regional, national, or global in nature". [53]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy</span> Energy collected from renewable resources

Renewable energy is energy from renewable natural resources that are replenished on a human timescale. The most widely used renewable energy types are solar energy, wind power, and hydropower. Bioenergy and geothermal power are also significant in some countries. Some also consider nuclear power a renewable power source, although this is controversial. Renewable energy installations can be large or small and are suited for both urban and rural areas. Renewable energy is often deployed together with further electrification. This has several benefits: electricity can move heat and vehicles efficiently and is clean at the point of consumption. Variable renewable energy sources are those that have a fluctuating nature, such as wind power and solar power. In contrast, controllable renewable energy sources include dammed hydroelectricity, bioenergy, or geothermal power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy development</span> Methods bringing energy into production

Energy development is the field of activities focused on obtaining sources of energy from natural resources. These activities include the production of renewable, nuclear, and fossil fuel derived sources of energy, and for the recovery and reuse of energy that would otherwise be wasted. Energy conservation and efficiency measures reduce the demand for energy development, and can have benefits to society with improvements to environmental issues.

The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), formerly Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, is a principal department of the U.S. state of Michigan for environmental issues. The department was created in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Australia</span>

Renewable energy in Australia is mainly based on biomass, solar, wind, and hydro generation. Over a third of electricity is generated from renewables, and is increasing, with a target to phase out coal power before 2040. Wind energy and rooftop solar have particularly grown since 2010. The growth has been stimulated by government energy policy in order to limit the rate of climate change in Australia that has been brought about by the use of fossil fuels. Pros and cons of various types of renewable energy are being investigated, and more recently there have been trials of green hydrogen and wave power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy commercialization</span> Deployment of technologies harnessing easily replenished natural resources

Renewable energy commercialization involves the deployment of three generations of renewable energy technologies dating back more than 100 years. First-generation technologies, which are already mature and economically competitive, include biomass, hydroelectricity, geothermal power and heat. Second-generation technologies are market-ready and are being deployed at the present time; they include solar heating, photovoltaics, wind power, solar thermal power stations, and modern forms of bioenergy. Third-generation technologies require continued R&D efforts in order to make large contributions on a global scale and include advanced biomass gasification, hot-dry-rock geothermal power, and ocean energy. In 2019, nearly 75% of new installed electricity generation capacity used renewable energy and the International Energy Agency (IEA) has predicted that by 2025, renewable capacity will meet 35% of global power generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in the United States</span>

According to data from the US Energy Information Administration, renewable energy accounted for 8.4% of total primary energy production and 21% of total utility-scale electricity generation in the United States in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Low-carbon electricity</span> Power produced with lower carbon dioxide emissions

Low-carbon electricity or low-carbon power is electricity produced with substantially lower greenhouse gas emissions over the entire lifecycle than power generation using fossil fuels. The energy transition to low-carbon power is one of the most important actions required to limit climate change.

The climate change policy of the United States has major impacts on global climate change and global climate change mitigation. This is because the United States is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gasses in the world after China, and is among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person in the world. Cumulatively, the United States has emitted over a trillion metric tons of greenhouse gases, more than any country in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy debate</span>

Policy makers often debate the constraints and opportunities of renewable energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in Spain</span>

Primary energy consumption in Spain in 2020 was mainly composed of fossil sources. The largest sources are petroleum (42.3%), natural gas (19.8%) and coal (11.6%). The remaining 26.3% is accounted for by nuclear energy (12%) and different renewable energy sources (14.3%). Domestic production of primary energy includes nuclear (44.8%), solar, wind and geothermal (22.4%), biomass and waste (21.1%), hydropower (7.2%) and fossil (4.5%).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wind power in Kenya</span>

Despite its high potential for wind energy generation, wind power in Kenya currently contributes only about 16 percent of the country's total electrical power. However, its share in energy production is increasing. Kenya Vision 2030 aims to generate 2,036 MW of wind power by 2030. To accomplish this goal, Kenya is developing numerous wind power generation centers and continues to rely on the nation's three major wind farms: the Lake Turkana Wind Power Station, the Kipeto Wind Power Station, and the Ngong Hills Wind Farm. While these wind power stations are beneficial to help offset fossil fuel usage and increase overall energy supply reliability in Kenya, project developments have also negatively impacted some indigenous communities and the parts of the environment surrounding the wind farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Kenya</span>

Most of Kenya's electricity is generated by renewable energy sources. Access to reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy is one of the 17 main goals of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Development of the energy sector is also critical to help Kenya achieve the goals in Kenya Vision 2030 to become a newly industrializing, middle-income country. With an installed power capacity of 2,819 MW, Kenya currently generates 826 MW hydroelectric power, 828 geothermal power, 749 MW thermal power, 331 MW wind power, and the rest from solar and biomass sources. Kenya is the largest geothermal energy producer in Africa and also has the largest wind farm on the continent. In March 2011, Kenya opened Africa's first carbon exchange to promote investments in renewable energy projects. Kenya has also been selected as a pilot country under the Scaling-Up Renewable Energy Programmes in Low Income Countries Programme to increase deployment of renewable energy solutions in low-income countries. Despite significant strides in renewable energy development, about a quarter of the Kenyan population still lacks access to electricity, necessitating policy changes to diversify the energy generation mix and promote public-private partnerships for financing renewable energy projects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Ethiopia</span>

Ethiopia generates most of its electricity from renewable energy, mainly hydropower.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Taiwan</span>

Renewable energy in Taiwan contributed to 8.7% of national electricity generation as of end of 2013. The total installed capacity of renewable energy in Taiwan by the end of 2013 was 3.76 GW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Turkey</span>

Renewables supply a quarter of energy in Turkey, including heat and electricity. Some houses have rooftop solar water heating, and hot water from underground warms many spas and greenhouses. In parts of the west hot rocks are shallow enough to generate electricity as well as heat. Wind turbines, also mainly near western cities and industry, generate a tenth of Turkey’s electricity. Hydropower, mostly from dams in the east, is the only modern renewable energy which is fully exploited. Hydropower averages about a fifth of the country's electricity, but much less in drought years. Apart from wind and hydro, other renewables; such as geothermal, solar and biogas; together generated almost a tenth of Turkey’s electricity in 2022. Türkiye has ranked 5th in Europe and 12th in the world in terms of installed capacity in renewable energy. The share of renewables in Türkiye’s installed power reached to 54% at the end of 2022.

In 2013, renewable energy provided 26.44% of the total electricity in the Philippines and 19,903 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electrical energy out of a total demand of 75,266 gigawatt-hours. The Philippines is a net importer of fossil fuels. For the sake of energy security, there is momentum to develop renewable energy sources. The types available include hydropower, geothermal power, wind power, solar power and biomass power. The government of the Philippines has legislated a number of policies in order to increase the use of renewable energy by the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in South Africa</span> Emissions, impacts and responses of South Africa related to climate change

Climate change in South Africa is leading to increased temperatures and rainfall variability. Evidence shows that extreme weather events are becoming more prominent due to climate change. This is a critical concern for South Africans as climate change will affect the overall status and wellbeing of the country, for example with regards to water resources. Just like many other parts of the world, climate research showed that the real challenge in South Africa was more related to environmental issues rather than developmental ones. The most severe effect will be targeting the water supply, which has huge effects on the agriculture sector. Speedy environmental changes are resulting in clear effects on the community and environmental level in different ways and aspects, starting with air quality, to temperature and weather patterns, reaching out to food security and disease burden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Texas</span> Climate change in the US state of Texas

The climate in Texas is changing partially due to global warming and rising trends in greenhouse gas emissions. As of 2016, most area of Texas had already warmed by 1.5 °F (0.83 °C) since the previous century because of greenhouse gas emissions by the United States and other countries. Texas is expected to experience a wide range of environmental impacts from climate change in the United States, including rising sea levels, more frequent extreme weather events, and increasing pressure on water resources.

<i>Held v. Montana</i> 2023 U.S. State Constitutional court case

Held v. Montana is a constitutional court case in the State of Montana regarding the right to a "clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations":Art. IX, § 1 as required by the Constitution of Montana. The case was filed in March 2020 by Our Children's Trust on behalf of sixteen youth residents of Montana, then aged 2 through 18. On June 12, 2023, the case became the first climate-related constitutional lawsuit to go to trial in the United States.

References

  1. ↑ United States, EPA. (2016). What Climate Change Means for Montana. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/climate-change-mt.pdf
  2. ↑ Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Climate Change. "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Water". Archived from the original on 2011-12-01. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
  3. ↑ Larson, Robert P.; Bryne, James M.; Johnson, Daniel L.; Letts, Matthew G.; Kienzie, Stefan W. (2010). "Modelling Climate Change Impacts on Spring Runoff for the Rocky Mountains of Montana and Alberta I: Model Development, Calibration and Historical Analysis". Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 36 (1): 17–34. doi:10.4296/cwrj3601017. S2CID   109993368.
  4. ↑ "Mapping Montana for Climate Change". WCS Newsroom. Wildlife Conservation Society. 2011-06-23. Retrieved 2022-04-09.
  5. ↑ Montana Climate Change Advisory Committee. "Montana Climate Change Action Plan". 2007, Section 2, pp. 2, 5; Appendix I, p. 43.
  6. ↑ Boisenvue, Celine and Running, Steven. "Simulations Show Decreasing Carbon Stocks and Potential for Carbon Emissions in Rocky Mountain Forests Over the Next Century". Ecological Applications, 2010, pp. 1302-1319.
  7. 1 2 3 "What Climate Change Means for Montana" (PDF). US Environmental Protection Agency. January 19, 2017. Retrieved 21 April 2024.
  8. ↑ "Climate Change - Impacts". Montana Department of Environmental Quality. Archived from the original on 2012-04-26. Retrieved 21 April 2024.
  9. ↑ "Health | Climate Change — Health and Environmental Effects | U.S. EPA". Epa.gov. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Harvard Medical School Center for Health and the Global Environment, Climate Change and Health in Montana (Nov. 2009)
  11. 1 2 "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Renewable Energy". Deq.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  12. ↑ "Montana Wind Facts | Community wind energy development by National Wind". Nationalwind.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  13. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Tax Incentives". Deq.mt.gov. 2011-04-18. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  14. ↑ "News: NewsDetail". .eere.energy.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  15. ↑ "Montana Department of Commerce — Wind Energy". Commerce.mt.gov. 2010-06-28. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  16. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Historical Energy Statistics". Deq.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  17. ↑ "Montana Department of Commerce — Wind & Transmission Working Group". Commerce.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  18. ↑ "Montana Department of Commerce — Energy Accomplishments". Commerce.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  19. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Wind Power Map". Deq.mt.gov. 2011-09-23. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  20. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Geothermal Energy Program". Deq.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  21. ↑ "EERE: Geothermal Technologies Program Home Page". .eere.energy.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  22. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Sites". Deq.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  23. ↑ "Solar". MontanaGreenPower.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  24. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Solar/Geothermal Energy". Deq.mt.gov. 2011-09-16. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  25. ↑ "Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Action Plan". Deq.mt.gov. 2009-11-13. Archived from the original on 2012-01-01. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  26. ↑ http://www.ci.helena.mt.us/fileadmin/user_upload/City_Public_Works/Global_Climate/Documents/2009/Climate_Task_Force_Report_8-19-09.pdf%5B%5D
  27. ↑ https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20120514175243/https://www.bozeman.net/Departments-(1)/Administration/Documents/BOZEMAN-COMMUNITY-CAP-2011-FINAL.aspx [ bare URL PDF ]
  28. ↑ http://www.geosinstitute.org/images/stories/pdfs/MissoulaFINALreport.pdf%5B%5D
  29. ↑ Montana State University Climate Change Action Plan "MSU Sustainability - Climate Action Plan". Archived from the original on 2012-03-15. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
  30. ↑ University of Montana Climate Change Action Plan
  31. ↑ Clark Fork Coalition Climate Change Action Plan "Community Action: ClimateWise". Archived from the original on 2011-11-26. Retrieved 2011-12-01.
  32. ↑ Camel, Keya. "Climate Change Advisory Committee (CCAC)". CSKT Climate Change. Retrieved 2023-01-29.
  33. ↑ City of Red Lodge Energy Conservation Plan "City of Red Lodge website".
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Otter Creek background — Montana Environmental Information Center". Meic.org. Archived from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  35. ↑ "Otter Creek Fact Sheet-draft" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  36. ↑ MIKE DENNISON Missoulian State Bureau (2010-03-18). "Land Board approves $86M Otter Creek coal deal; Missoula protesters arrested". Missoulian.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  37. ↑ "77-1-121. Environmental review compliance — exemptions". Data.opi.mt.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  38. 1 2 http://leg.mt.gov/content/Services%20Division/Lepo/mepa/Court-Cases/NPRCvsBLC.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  39. 1 2 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-26. Retrieved 2011-12-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/OP%2011-0258%20Writ%20-%20Other%20--%20Petition?id={80553430-6861-4124-B4AE-AC8877E1449A} [ bare URL ]
  41. 1 2 GWEN FLORIO of the Missoulian (2011-05-18). "Montana Supreme Court orders state to respond to children's climate change lawsuit". Missoulian.com. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  42. 1 2 "Montana AG Seeks Rejection of Climate Change Lawsuit". Flathead Beacon. 1970-01-01. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  43. 1 2 "Montana court denies climate petition — The Bozeman Daily Chronicle: Environment". The Bozeman Daily Chronicle. 2011-06-16. Retrieved 2011-12-06.
  44. 1 2 Noor, Dharna (12 June 2023). "Young Montana residents bring climate change case to court for first time ever". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 June 2023.
  45. ↑ Uyeda, Ray Levy (April 13, 2022). "Fossil fuels v our future: young Montanans wage historic climate fight". The Guardian. Archived from the original on March 10, 2023.
  46. ↑ Noor, Dharna (June 12, 2023). "'My life and my home': young people start to testify at historic US climate trial". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023.
  47. ↑ "The Constitution of the State of Montana" (PDF). courts.mt.gov. Montana Judicial Branch. March 22, 1972. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2023.
  48. ↑ Gelles, David (March 24, 2023). "In Montana, It's Youth vs. the State in a Landmark Climate Case". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023.
  49. ↑ Miller, Blair (June 19, 2023). "DEQ employees, 'climate economist,' testify for state in Montana climate change trial". Daily Montanan. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023.
  50. ↑ Noor, Dharna (June 20, 2023). "Groundbreaking youth-led climate trial comes to an end in Montana". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023.
  51. ↑ Hanson, Amy Beth; Brown, Matthew (August 14, 2023). "Young environmental activists prevail in first-of-its-kind climate change trial in Montana". AP News. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023.
  52. ↑ Brown, Matthew; Hanson, Amy Beth (July 10, 2024). "Republicans urge reversal of landmark ruling in Montana climate change lawsuit by young plaintiffs". AP News. Archived from the original on July 11, 2024.
  53. 1 2 Tigue, Kristoffer (May 16, 2023). "Montana's New Anti-Climate Law May Be the Most Aggressive in the Nation". Inside Climate News. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.