Dano-Mughal War

Last updated
Dano-Mughal War
Eckersberg, CW - Korvetten Najaden under sejl.jpg
Danish ship, Najaden in India
Date1642 – 1698
Location
Result See peace
Territorial
changes
Dannemarksnagore ceded to Denmark-Norway
Belligerents
Commanders and leaders
Royal Standard of Denmark (1731-1819).svg Christian IV
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Von Kalnein
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Poul Nielsen
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Willem Leyel
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Bernt Pessart
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Claus Rytter
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png Carsten Ludvigsen
Alam of the Mughal Empire.svg Shah Jahan
Alam of the Mughal Empire.svg Mirza Mumin
Flag of the Principality of Bengal (15th-18th century).svg Mohammed Ajumadi
Flag of the Principality of Bengal (15th-18th century).svg Malik Kasim
Flag of the Principality of Bengal (15th-18th century).svg Abdul Gany (POW)
Flag of the Principality of Bengal (15th-18th century).svg Merse Meliquebek
Strength
5 ships (1647-1648) [1] Unknown
Casualties and losses
30 ships [1] Unknown

The Dano-Mughal War, formally Danish East India Company's War against the Mughal Empire, was a colonial and maritime conflict between the Mughal Empire and the Danish East India Company over trade commerce in the Bay of Bengal. Lasting from 1642 to 1698, the conflict has also been referred to by historians as the Dano-Bengali Thirty Years' War [2] [3]

Contents

Background

Kristian IV av Danmark, malning av Pieter Isaacsz 1611-1616.jpg
Christian IV, King of Denmark and Norway and more... (r.1588-1648)
Shah Jahan I of India.jpg
Shah Jahan I, Emperor of the Mughals (r.1628-1658)

At the start of the 17th century European colonialism started to expand. Christian IV, an ambitious king who wanted to show off Denmark–Norway on the international stage, sought to increase Denmark's sphere of influence and its financial and economic independence, [4] so he founded the first Danish East India Company in 1616. Nevertheless he stimulated the establishment of trading companies for Greenland, Iceland, and the West and East Indies. The company was initially weak. It had had a rough First expedition and wanted to expand its Mercantilism.

Declaration of War

In 1642 the Danish East India Company declared war on the Mughal Empire. This may sound unreasonable, by comparing the two nations. The Mughals were a vast Asiatic Empire, while Denmark was a declining power. For instance the Mughal Empire's army was perhaps fifty times larger than Denmark's entire population. [5] [6]

Reasons to why the Danish East India Company declared war on the Mughal Empire lay in the nature of European Maritime trade. Violence was used to ensure the safe transport of Goods and was key to the success of Commercial enterprise in medieval Europe. [7] Another mean, mercantilism, the dominant economic theory in sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe was also contributing to the competition and conflict in the area. It associated states' strength with their economic dominance. It also emphasized commercial competition. Such competition was used by various European Charter companies like the Danish East India Company.

In 1640, On a voyage from Makassar to Masulipatnam, the St. Jacob was seized and wrecked by Bengali local authorities, the Danes could not negotiate the release of the cargo. [8] Dutch records claims that the St. Jacob's cargo was seized because of Danish debts, but the Danes viewed the seizure as a tyrannous act [9] and in 1642 made a formal declaration of war

Danish and other European settlements in Sri Lanka and India. European settlements in India 1501-1739.png
Danish and other European settlements in Sri Lanka and India.

War (phase 1643-1650)

War at sea

Shortly after declaring war, Denmark swiftly dispatched two of Tranquebar's finest vessels towards Bengal, where they successfully captured a ship that they later renamed Den Bengalske Prise. [10]

For the Danes, the war served as a means to finance their company, a vital source of revenue during the period from 1639 to 1668, when the company faced dissolution and resurrection, with no reinforcements arriving from Denmark to assist in Asia. [11] The Danes exhibited a clear inclination towards financial gain, with their primary focus lying in maximizing profits rather than directly attacking the Mughals. They particularly targeted ships returning from Southeast Asia due to their immensely valuable cargoes. [12]

Danish seizures of Bengali ships became alarmingly frequent for the Mughals, and a letter from Willem Leyel states " they were doing their best to cause the Bengalis as much harm as possible," [13] The repercussions of these seizures took a severe toll on the businesses and professional lives of Bengali individual merchants, instilling a deep fear that discouraged them from venturing to sea, fearful of potential capture by the Danes. [14] Resistance against the Danish sailors was scarce. According to Danish colonial historian Gunnar Olsen, the Bengalis exhibited a sense of resignation, as described in his writings. "the Bengalis seem to have given up in advance on any form of resistance against the Danish ships." [15]

Altho resistance was rare, it was not entirely absent. In a notable incident off the Gingeli coast in 1644, the yacht Walby intercepted two sizable Bengali ships carrying elephants, resulting in a skirmish where some of the elephants tragically perished, [16] documenting the use of violent resistance by Bengalis. The overall lack of efficacy in resisting the Danish forces can be attributed to the stark contrast in naval warfare capabilities between the Europeans and the Mughals. [17]

Land skirmishes

Recorded land confrontations were rare, with only two notable instances.

The initial occurrence took place in the early 1640s, prior to the official declaration of war. The Danes, stationed at Pipli under the leadership of Poul Nielsen, encountered significant financial troubles. A Persian merchant, who owed a substantial amount to the Danes, adamantly refused to settle his debts. In response, the Danes resorted to imprison him within his own residence. However, when this approach proved ineffective, they proceeded to seize one of his slaves and impound a portion of his goods at the Danish trading post. The Mughals, considering this a violation of their sovereignty, promptly dispatched a force of 300 men to seize and set ablaze the Danish trading station. All the confiscated goods were taken and the Danish factors were imprisoned, although Nielsen and several others managed to escape to Tranquebar. [18]

Fort Dansborg at Tranquebar, the first and main Danish Indian outpost Fort Dansborg in Tharangambadi, Tamil Nadu.jpg
Fort Dansborg at Tranquebar, the first and main Danish Indian outpost

The second encounter occurred during the mid-1640s, following the formal declaration of war. A Danish vessel, carrying a crew of six, was wrecked along the Bengali coast. The surviving crew members were subsequently detained by the Bengalis, prompting the initiation of a Danish rescue operation. Led by Nielsen, a group of 16 men set out towards the Mughal governor's residence in Pipli, where the captured crew was rumored to be held captive. They confronted the guards, causing the governor to hastily flee. However, their search yielded no sign of the castaways. Nielsen then proposed investigating the town hall, which was vigilantly guarded by soldiers who had already been informed of the ongoing mission. Despite the guards' alertness, the Danes managed to overpower several of them, forcing the others to flee. Subsequently, they gained access to the town hall, where they discovered the castaways confined in formidable iron chains. Remarkably, the Danish rescue mission achieved its objective with minimal casualties and zero fatalities.

Danish manifesto

A Portuguese-written manifesto was crafted to justify the Danish stance. Bearing the date August 24, 1644, this concise document spans five pages and serves to outline the grievances the Danes sought to address. Commencing with the Danish loss of Jupiter, a vessel carrying valuable cargo, as well as the subsequent imprisonment of its crew in 1625. Additionally, it recounts the distressing incident involving the abduction of a young Danish boy, who was forcefully converted to Islam and disappeared without a trace. The documents blame the Mughal governor for both the instances. Then it explains how the Danes stopped trading in Bengal because of these "robberies, offenses and tyrannies"

Danish India during the regime of Roland Crappe Danish India 1622-1636.png
Danish India during the regime of Roland Crappé

It also describes several other instances of Mughal aggression like the Mughal governor's obstruction of commerce, the assault on Danish factors at Pipli, and the poisoning of shipwrecked Danish servants. Some of these instances are rejected by scholars [19] [lower-alpha 1]

The manifesto, in its essence, appears as trying to portray their enemy's lack of morality and shame, while simultaneously underscoring the Danish continued willingness to negotiate.

Failed negotiations

Because of the lack of naval power, the Mughals sought to put an end to the war by instead negotiating and making compromises with the Danes. First in 1645, where they offered 80,000 rupees in compensation for peace. Yet Danish governor, Willem Leyel, rejected the offer, hoping to instead receive 436,500 rix-dollars. Leyel instead intensified the fighting.

The Mughals again tried to compromise with Denmark in 1647 or early 1648, but did not result in any significant peace [20]

In 1647, the Danish instructions stated that for peace to be established with the Bengalis, three conditions had to be met.

  1. A substantial cash payment was required.
  2. The Danes were to be granted equal trading privileges as the Dutch.
  3. Arrangements were to be made for the forgiveness of all debts that Pessart had incurred in Masulipatnam.
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign of India Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign India.png
Danish Colonial Merchant Ensign of India

Having themselves failed to negotiate with the Danes, the Mughals instead tried to pressure other European colonial powers to intervene. After a Danish seizure of two large Bengali ships, the Mughals were enraged [21] Yet they could not revenge the Danes because the Danish East India Company no longer had any territory inside of the Mughal Empire [22] Therefore Shah Shuja, Mughal Prince, made an ultimatum for the Dutch East India Company to either stop Danish aggression or leave Bengal, However, after discussions, he was persuaded against pursuing the ultimatum. [23]

In 1649, local authorities attempted a similar action by refusing favorable trading terms from the VOC, if the Dutch could not assure the protection of their merchants against the Danes. The Dutch, deeming this proposition as ridiculous, rejected. [24] VOC eventually accepted protections of merchants with Muslims background, against Danish aggression [25]

The loyalty of certain Danish Company servants added complexity to the peace negotiations. Christian IV had a strong bond with the Danish East India Company, so much so that he became the "Head and Lord of the whole Company" in 1629. [26] He had consistently declined to dissolve the Company, even though it was not profitable, due to concerns about losing his reputation in Denmark and abroad. [27] The company was eventually dissolved [lower-alpha 2] after Christian's death [28] when informed about its dissolution, the Danish factors stationed in Asia had no choice but to continue operating the Asian settlements as they were the property of the Crown. [29]

Late phase (1669-1698)

Christian V of Denmark Christian V. of Denmark.jpg
Christian V of Denmark

After the dissolution of the first company and conflicts at home, relations between Denmark and Tranquebar were re-established in 1669 after a successful expedition by the frigate Færø in 1668, which resulted in the renewal of Danish interests in the region. In 1672 Christian V wrote a letter to the Mughals, asking for compensation for Danish vessels during the conflict. [30] The compensation was never fulfilled, the Danes became increasingly frustrated and even chased and blew up two greater vessels near Hughli [31] The incidents and skirmishes continued, until eventually, the Danes felt the absence of the Bengali market and decided to resume negotiations.

Peace

A provisional peace was agreed upon in 1674 [1] However, this period of peace was short-lived as the Danes continued to pillage Bengali merchants for their own financial benefit. Danish hostilities were renewed against Bengal after the vessel Christianshavn was wrecked by the local faujdar (commander responsible for administering sub-districts) according to the Danish claims. [32] Danish harassments of both hostile but also peaceful Bengali merchants went on until the late seventeenth century. The Danes wished to regain their influence in Bengal by reestablishing their presence in the region. They yet again tried to negotiate a peace with the Mughals, this time succeeding.

In 1698, Andreas Andræ, along with Thomas Schmertz, was dispatched to Bengal by the Danish government. They arrived with ships, Indian servants, money, goods, and Danish settlers with the intention to establish a trading presence in the region. Andræ successfully negotiated a peace agreement with the Bengali governor, Mohammed Ajumadi, wherein both parties agreed to set aside their claims over previously confiscated ships. The Danish delegates also gifted 15,000 rupees and four cannons to the prince. [33] Moreover, Andræ secured a lease for a plot of land at Gondalapara close to the French settlement of Chandernagore for 30,000 rupees to be paid over a period of ten years. This area eventually became known as Dannemarksnagore, where the Danes established a trading post that served as the foundation for their operations in Bengal. [34]

See also

Notes

  1. Numerous scholars have doubted the likelihood that the locals would have deliberately poisoned the Danes.
  2. The initial company was in operation from 1616 to 1650, while the second company existed between 1670 and 1729, before being re-established in 1730 as the Asiatic Company (Danish: Asiatisk Kompagni), .

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danish East India Company</span> Defunct Danish trading company

The Danish East India Company refers to two separate Danish-Norwegian chartered companies. The first company operated between 1616 and 1650. The second company existed between 1670 and 1729, however, in 1730 it was re-founded as the Asiatic Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danish India</span> Former settlements and trading posts of Denmark and Norway on the Indian subcontinent

Danish India was the name given to the colonies of Denmark in the Indian subcontinent, forming part of the Danish overseas colonies. Denmark–Norway held colonial possessions in India for more than 200 years, including the town of Tharangambadi in present-day Tamil Nadu state, Serampore in present-day West Bengal, and the Nicobar Islands, currently part of India's union territory of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The Danish and Norwegian presence in India was of little significance to the major European powers as they presented neither a military nor a mercantile threat. Dano-Norwegian ventures in India, as elsewhere, were typically undercapitalised and never able to dominate or monopolise trade routes in the same way that British, French, and Portuguese ventures could.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of the Dutch Empire</span>

The Dutch Empire is a term comprising different territories that were controlled by the Netherlands from the 17th to 20th centuries. They settled outside Europe with skills in trade and transport. In the late 16th century, the Netherlands reclaimed their lead at sea, and by the second half of the 17th century, dominated it. This hundred-year period is called the Dutch Golden Age. The Dutch built their empire with corporate colonialism by establishing the Dutch East India Company (VOC) and the Dutch West India Company (GWC), following Britain's footsteps, which led to war between both empires. After the French Revolutionary Wars, the Netherlands lost most of its power to the British after the French armies invaded the Netherlands and parts of the Dutch colonies. Hence, Dutch leaders had to defend their colonies and homeland. Between 1795 and 1814, the French restored the VOC in Indonesia and Suriname which remained under Dutch control.


Sultan Saidi was the tenth Sultan of Tidore in Maluku islands. He was also known as Magiau, and ruled from 1640 to 1657. His reign saw intermittent hostilities with Tidore's traditional rival, the Sultanate of Ternate, which included interference in an anti-Dutch rebellion in Ternate and Ambon and attempts to increase Tidorese territory in Maluku. By the time of Saidi's reign Tidore had gained a political position in parts of the Papuan territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skirmish at Pipli</span> Confrontation between the Danes and Mughals in Pipli

The Skirmish at Pipli or more formally the Destruction of the Danish factory at Pipli, was one of the two recorded land confrontations between the Danish East India Company and the Mughal Empire during the Dano-Mughal War. The Skirmish was a Mughal punitive expidition in retalition for the Danish arrest of a Persian merchant. The Skirmish ended in a Mughal victory, and the Danish factory in Pipli was destroyed and burned down.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danish rescue mission to Pipli</span> Danish rescue mission in Bengal

The Danish rescue mission to Pipli refers to a rescue mission by the Danish East India Company to rescue, then recently, imprisoned Danes from Mughal imprisonment at the trading station of Pipely. The mission was successful and the six imprisoned Danes were freed. The mission can also be referred to as the Mission to pipli.

Loss of the <i>St. Jacob</i> Seizure of a Danish ship by Benglis

The Loss of the St. Jacob also referred to as the Seizure of St. Jacob was a destruction and seizure of the Danish merchant ship, St. Jacob, by local Bengali authorities. The loss and destruction of the ship and its crew, led to the Dano-Mughal War, which would last for 56 years.

The Dano-Mughal Treaty was a peace treaty between the Mughal Empire and Denmark–Norway ending the 56-year-long Dano-Mughal War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Dansborg (1644)</span> Siege in Tranquebar, India 1644

The Siege of Dansborg or the Siege of Fort Dansborg, was a short siege lasting from 20 to 30 December 1644, between general Tiagepule of Thanjavur and the Danish command at Fort Dansborg. The conflict started over the Danish rejection of the general's demand to tax Tranquebar, and as a result, a series of confrontations followed. The confrontations had no major result, and an armistice may have been signed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Willem Leyel's siege of Dansborg</span> Siege of Fort Dansborg, 1644

The Siege of Dansborg alternatively the Siege of Fort Dansborg sometimes also referred to as Willem Leyel's siege of Dansborg, was a siege initiated by traveler and seafarer, Willem Leyel, against the men loyal to governor Bernt Pessart. The siege was concluded after the men at Dansborg opened the gates for Willem Leyel, surrendered and accepted Leyel as the new governor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Dansborg (1624)</span> Siege on Danish fort in India, 1624

The Siege of Dansborg or the Siege of Fort Dansborg, was a siege of the newly finished Danish fort of Dansborg in Trangebar in 1624. The siege was initiated by the nayak of Thanjavur, Raghunatha, because of the Danish rejection of the demands from the nayak. The Siege, laid by general Calicut, was abandoned after the arrival of Danish reinforcements from sea. The event is mostly described by Icelander, Jón Ólafsson, in his work The Life of the Icelander Jón Ólafsson, Traveller to India.

A Siege of Dansborg may refer to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roland Crappé's raids on Portuguese colonies</span> Danish raids in India and Sri Lanka, 1619

Roland Crappé's raids on Portuguese colonies refers to a series of raids by Dutchman in Danish service, Roland Crappé, on Portuguese Ceylon and India. The raids were partially unsuccessful, in that Crappé's ship, Øresund, catched fire and sank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skirmish at the Strait of Malacca</span> Skirmish between Danes and Dutch in Malacca, 1644

The Skirmish at the Strait of Malacca was a skirmish between the claimed governor of Tranquebar, Bernt Pessart, and the local authorities of Dutch Malacca. The confrontation led to the imprisonment or death of all of Pessart's crew and the confiscation of the vessel, Dend gode Haab. Although Pessart and his crew would later be released and cooperate with the Dutch to spy on the Spanish in Manila.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ambush near the Bay of Manila</span> Ambush of Danish and Dutch sailors in the Philippines, 1645

The Ambush near the Bay of Manila, alternatively the Death of Bernt Pessart, was an ambush by the Indigenous peoples of the Philippines, against a combined Dano-Dutch espionaging expeditionary force in 1645. The ambush led to the death of former governor and president of Danish India, Bernt Pessart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sieges of Tranquebar (1655–1669)</span> Sieges in Tranquebar, India 1655-1669

The Sieges of Tranquebar or the War between Tranquebar and Thanjavur refers to the warfare between the Thanjavur Nayak kingdom and Danish Tranquebar between 1655 – 1669. The Thanjavurian sieges were repelled, mainly due to the new fortifications being build around Tranquebar, and a peace agreement was issued in 1669.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conflict between Willem Leyel and Bernt Pessart</span> Conflict and Danish civil war in India, between 1643–1645

The Conflict between William Leyel and Bernt Pessart refers to the tensions and minor civil war between Willem Leyel and Bernt Pessart over the governorship of Tranquebar and the Danish East India Company. The conflict led to the escape of Bernt Pessart, and the command at Tranquebar accepted Willem Leyel as governor of Danish India.

Capture of <i>St. Michael</i> Capture of Bengali ship by the Danes in 1644

The Capture of St. Michael or the Seizure of St. Michael, was a Danish seizure of a Bengali ship in the Bay of Bengal. The Danes captured the Bengali ship and the vessel was subsequently incorporated into the Danish Navy given the name St. Michael.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attack in Hooghly</span> Danish attack on Bengali vessels in Hooghly, 1671

The Attack in Hooghly was a Danish attack on two Bengali ships during the Dano-Mughal War in 1671. The Danes succeeded in blowing up the Bengali ships, and violence continued off the coasts of Kalingapatnam and Balasore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Balasore</span> Battle between Mughals and Europeans in Balasore, 1647

The Battle of Balasore was an engagement between Bengali and English ships against Danish ships at Balasore. When the English failed to persuade the Danes, the Bengalis started attacking the English vessel, yet the English were rescued by the Dutch.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Olsen. Dansk Ostindien[Danish East India] (in Danish). p. 184.
  2. Rasmussen, Jens (1982). To verdenshistorier[Two world histories] (in Danish). Copenhagen and Oslo: Politikens Forlag. p. 65.
  3. Clausen, Sven (1983). Den Dansk-Begalske Trediveårskrig[[The Dano-Bengali Thirty Years War]] (in Danish). Aarhus.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. Nair, P. C. (June 1974). "Sociétés et Compagnies de Commerce en Orient et dans l'Ocean Indien. By Michel Mollat editor. (Actes du Huitième Colloque International d'Histoire Maritime, Beirut, 1966). Paris: S. E. V. P. E. N., 1970. Pp. 731, 8 plates. 62 Francs". The Journal of Economic History. 34 (2): 514–515. doi:10.1017/s0022050700080281. ISSN   0022-0507. S2CID   154693349.
  5. Raychaudhuri, Tapan (1982-04-01), "The Mughal Empire", The Cambridge Economic History of India, Cambridge University Press, pp. 172–193, doi:10.1017/chol9780521226929.011, ISBN   978-1-139-05451-5 , retrieved 2023-11-11
  6. Johansen, Hans Chr. (January 1972). "Some aspects of Danish rural population structure in 1787". Scandinavian Economic History Review. 20 (1): 61–70. doi:10.1080/03585522.1972.10407711. ISSN   0358-5522.
  7. Davis, Lance E. (September 1980). "Profits from Power: Readings in Protection Rent and Violence-Controlling Enterprises. By Frederic C. Lane. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1979. Pp. 128. $24.95 cloth, $7.95 paper". The Journal of Economic History. 40 (3): 675–676. doi:10.1017/s0022050700085892. ISSN   0022-0507. S2CID   154335771.
  8. Larsen, Øivind (2012). "Historie, helse og makt i Dansk Vestindia". Tidsskrift for den Norske Legeforening. 132 (17): 1990–1991. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0778 . ISSN   0029-2001.
  9. Coolhaas, W. P. (August 1970). "Generale Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie. Vol. III: 1655-1674". The Economic History Review. 23 (2): 417. doi:10.2307/2593871. ISSN   0013-0117. JSTOR   2593871.
  10. Larsen, Kay (1907). "Danske Kapertoger i den bengalske Havbugt, 1642-1648," (in Danish). Olsen, Dansk Ostindien. pp. 435–436.
  11. "1830, 1831", Twenty-Nine Years in the West Indies and Central Africa, Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–49, 2010-09-16, doi:10.1017/cbo9780511711473.003, ISBN   9781108016698 , retrieved 2023-12-26
  12. Hauge, Peter (2002-06-01). "Et brev fra diplomaten Stephen Lesieur til Chr. IV's lutenist John Dowland". Magasin Fra Det Kongelige Bibliotek. 15 (2): 3–13. doi:10.7146/mag.v15i2.66844. ISSN   1904-4348.
  13. Lo Russo, Rosaria (2020), "Mettere in voce il verso. La pratica del reading di poesia fra letteratura e vocalità", L'arte orale, Accademia University Press, pp. 71–90, doi: 10.4000/books.aaccademia.8090 , ISBN   9791280136176 , retrieved 2023-12-26
  14. Goor, J. van (1972-01-01). "W.Ph. Coolhaas, Generale missiven der V.O.C., I, 1610-1628, II, 1639-1655,III, 1655-1674, IV, 1675-1684". BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review. 87 (1): 108–110. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.1712. ISSN   2211-2898.
  15. "Vore Gamle Tropekolonier. Edited by <italic>Johannes Bröndsted</italic>. Volume I, Dansk Ostindien og Dansk Guinea. By <italic>Gunnar Olsen, Kamma Struwe, Aage Rasch</italic>, and <italic>Georg Nörregaard</italic>. Volume II, Dansk Vestindien. By <italic>Jens Bro-Jörgensen, Jens Vibœk, Fridlev Skrubbeltrang</italic>, and <italic>Georg Nörregaard</italic>. (Copenhagen: Westermann. 1952, 1953. Pp. 665; 577. Kr. 550.)". The American Historical Review. April 1954. doi:10.1086/ahr/59.3.607. ISSN   1937-5239.
  16. Hauge, Peter (2002-06-01). "Et brev fra diplomaten Stephen Lesieur til Chr. IV's lutenist John Dowland". Magasin Fra Det Kongelige Bibliotek. 15 (2): 3–13. doi:10.7146/mag.v15i2.66844. ISSN   1904-4348.
  17. Marshall, P. J. (February 1980). "Western Arms in Maritime Asia in the Early Phases of Expansion". Modern Asian Studies. 14 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1017/s0026749x00012142. ISSN   0026-749X. S2CID   143911505.
  18. Goebel, Erik (November 2011). "The trials and travels of Willem Leyel: an account of the Danish East India Company in Tranquebar, 1639–48". Journal for Maritime Research. 13 (2): 164–165. doi:10.1080/21533369.2011.622877. ISSN   2153-3369. S2CID   161425363.
  19. Dewhurst, R. P. (October 1924). "Recent books on India - 8.—From Akbar to Aurangzeb. A Study in Indian Economic History. By W. H. Moreland, C.S.I., C.I.E. 9 × 5¾, xiii + 346 pp., 2 maps. London: Macmillan & Co., 1923". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 56 (4): 684–686. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00065710. ISSN   1356-1863. S2CID   163256348.
  20. Olsen. Dansk Ostindien. pp. 139–141.
  21. Goor, J. van (1972-01-01). "W.Ph. Coolhaas, Generale missiven der V.O.C., I, 1610-1628, II, 1639-1655,III, 1655-1674, IV, 1675-1684". BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review. 87 (1): 108–110. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.1712. ISSN   2211-2898.
  22. Feldbæk. No Ship for Tranquebar for Twenty-nine Years. p. 35.
  23. Raychaudhuri, Tapan (1962-01-01). Jan Company in Coromandel 1605-1690. BRILL. doi:10.1163/9789004286641. ISBN   978-90-04-28664-1.
  24. Goor, J. van (1972-01-01). "W.Ph. Coolhaas, Generale missiven der V.O.C., I, 1610-1628, II, 1639-1655,III, 1655-1674, IV, 1675-1684". BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review. 87 (1): 108–110. doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.1712. ISSN   2211-2898.
  25. Ibid III. p. 864.
  26. Bredsdorff. The Trials and Travels of Willem Leyel. p. 22.
  27. Bellamy, Martin (2006-10-13). Christian IV and his Navy. BRILL. doi:10.1163/9789047411291. ISBN   978-90-474-1129-1.
  28. "Ostindisk Kompagni, 1616-1729". danmarkshistorien.dk (in Danish). Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  29. Feldbæk and Justesen. Kolonierne i Asian og Afrika. p. 76.
  30. Clausen, Sven (1983). Den Dansk-Begalske Trediveårskrig[The Dano-Bengali Thirty Years War] (in Danish). Aarhus. p. 109.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  31. Coolhaas, W. P. (August 1970). "Generale Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie. Vol. III: 1655-1674". The Economic History Review. 23 (2): 417. doi:10.2307/2593871. ISSN   0013-0117. JSTOR   2593871.
  32. Larsen, Øivind (2012). "Historie, helse og makt i Dansk Vestindia". Tidsskrift for den Norske Legeforening. 132 (17): 1990–1991. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0778 . ISSN   0029-2001.
  33. Coolhaas, W. P. (August 1970). "Generale Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie. Vol. III: 1655-1674". The Economic History Review. 23 (2): 417. doi:10.2307/2593871. ISSN   0013-0117. JSTOR   2593871.
  34. Larsen, Kay (1940). "Da Fattiromany blev taget: En dansk Kup i Bengalen 1714,"[When Fattiromany was Taken: A Danish Coup in Bengal 1714] (in Danish). p. 31.