Dornier Do 31

Last updated
Do 31
1968 DornierDo31 (cropped).png
Dornier Do 31 in 1968
Role VTOL transport
Manufacturer Dornier Flugzeugwerke
First flight10 February 1967
StatusProject cancelled in April 1970
Primary user German Air Force
Number built3
Variants Dornier Do 231

The Dornier Do 31 is an experimental, jet-propelled, vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) cargo aircraft that was designed and produced by West German aircraft manufacturer Dornier.

Contents

The development of the Do 31 was motivated principally by heavy interest expressed by the German Air Force in the acquisition of short take-off and vertical landing aircraft (STOVL)-capable aircraft. Such ambitions received a further boost from the issuing of NATO specification NBMR-4, which called for a VTOL-capable tactical support aircraft that would be operated in conjunction with the EWR VJ 101, a West German VTOL strike aircraft designed under the NATO contract of BMR-3. [1] A total of three aircraft, two flight-capable and one static airframe, were constructed and used for testing. On 10 February 1967, the Do 31 performed its maiden flight; the first hovering flight of the type took place during July 1967.

In addition to performing test flights, Dornier often demonstrated the Do 31 prototypes to officials and the general public, such as at the 1969 Paris Air Show. Several world records were set by the type during its limited flying career. When the high cost, technical and logistical difficulties of operating such an aircraft were realized, the German Air Force opted to cease trials involving VTOL aircraft, such as the Do 31, VJ101, and the later VFW VAK 191B. In the face of limited sales prospects and a lack of state support, the Do 31 and other VTOL projects lingered as research projects for a time prior to their manufacturers abandoning all activity. The Do 31 remains the only VTOL-capable jet-powered transport aircraft to ever fly.

Design and development

Background

During the late 1950s and 1960s, the German Air Force became increasingly concerned that, in the event of a major conflict with the Eastern Bloc, its airfields would be highly vulnerable to attack, quickly preventing the use of conventional aircraft in any such conflict. Seeking to counter this threat, the service actively researched the possibility of dispersed operations; one of the options was the use of the nation's Autobahns , which necessitated such aircraft to possess short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) capabilities. [2] Due to this interest, a series of trials were conducted, which involved the modification of several German Air Force Lockheed F-104 Starfighters so that they could be rocket-launched from stationary ramps; these trials became known as the zero length launch (ZELL) programme. The Starfighters were to be recovered to short strips using aircraft carrier-type arresting gear; similarly, the later Do 31 was intended to use these same austere air strips as forward operating bases. [2]

As early as 1959, West German aircraft manufacturer Dornier had been informally working on several VTOL-related concepts, [3] although it would not be until 1961 that the design team would formalise what would become the Do 31. [4] Early activity centred around a series of studies on the topic of a VTOL-capable utility transport aircraft. Dornier's design team, based at the company's facility in Friedrichshafen, was headed by the aeronautical engineer Gustav Wieland. Already at this stage, Dornier was liaising with foreign companies, including British engine manufacturer Bristol Siddeley, who were independently working on their own VTOL-orientated engine already. [3]

The design of the flight control system was considered to be a critical element of any aircraft performing vertical flight, particularly in how it handled control failures. [5] To support the development programme, a purpose-built flight control test rig was constructed by Dornier, which allowed their design team to explore and evaluate different attitude control laws and flying qualities. [6] [7] To solve the differential equations necessary to model the aircraft in detail, the Dornier DO-960 hybrid computer was developed. [8] In spite of allowances to facilitate control during vertical flight, the flight control philosophy used upon the Do 31 was more akin to a conventional aircraft than that of a helicopter. [9]

Programme launch and design

Fairings at the top of a lift nacelle in the open position Dornier Do-31-E3 D-9531 VTOL LWingtip Liftjet LRear DMFO 10June2013 (14586154082).jpg
Fairings at the top of a lift nacelle in the open position

During February 1962, the formal launch of the Do 31 programme occurred with the issuing of a development contract from the West German government. [3] By the start of 1964, Dornier had started building a pair of prototype aircraft; their manufacture was largely performed at the company's Oberpfaffenhofen plant. [10] [11] A total of three test prototypes were constructed, these being E1, E2 and E3 - the "E" indicating Experimentell (Experimental). E1 was powered only by the Pegasus engines, having been designed to test horizontal flight. E2 was a static test airframe, and did not ever fly. E3 was furnished with both Pegasus and RB162 lift engines installed, being intended to evaluate the design's vertical flight mode.[ citation needed ]

The four Rolls-Royce RB162 lift engines seen from the bottom of a nacelle Dornier Do-31 Hubtriebwerke links.jpg
The four Rolls-Royce RB162 lift engines seen from the bottom of a nacelle

The design of the Do 31 was heavily reliant upon its engine configuration. Dornier had opted to incorporate the British-built Bristol Pegasus [note 1] vectored-thrust turbofan engine, an existing powerplant that was most famously used to power the Harrier jump jet. On the Do 31, a pair of Pegasus engines were housed in each of the two inboard nacelles; during the vertical phase of flight, additional lift was provided by an arrangement of four vertically mounted Rolls-Royce RB162 lift engines located in each of the outer nacelles. [4] [12]

Cargo area Dornier Do-31-E3 D-9531 VTOL Into Cargo Area Wide DMFO 10June2013 (14400249169).jpg
Cargo area

By mounting the engines in pods, the fuselage could accommodate a capacious hold for storing cargo, which was primarily accessed via a rear-facing loading ramp. Early designs of the Do 31 used more than four Rolls-Royce RB162s; the availability of more powerful versions of the Pegasus engine enabled the reduction to four supplemental lift engines. [13] Due to the engines being placed in nacelles, as opposed to within the fuselage as on the Harrier, the Pegasus had to be specially modified for the Do 31. [14]

Pitch control nozzles in the tail, fed from the Pegasus engines, two pointing up, two pointing down Dornier Do-31-E3 D-9531 VTOL TailNozzle DMFO 10June2013 (14583550231).jpg
Pitch control nozzles in the tail, fed from the Pegasus engines, two pointing up, two pointing down

Beyond providing adequate lift and control, other factors influenced the propulsion system. According to Dow, noise was a considerable concern, particularly as the airframe's critical frequency was close to that which was naturally generated by the lift engines. [15] The re-ingestion of hot exhaust gasses was another critical area, complicated by there being 16 'fountains' of gas being generated during vertical hover, 12 of which being hot. Following intense study during the flight testing phase of development, it was determined that positioning the nozzles at an angle of 85-degrees, rather than 90-degrees, was sufficient to avoid encountering any issue during takeoff, while no such issues were observed during landings at all. [16] Several different types of air intakes were also trialled, both to deter ingestion issues and the uneven start-up of the lift engines. Bleed air was also drawn from the Pegasus engines to the lift engines as a measure to address ingestion issues, while dedicated studies were performed on ground erosion effects. [17]

Into flight

On 10 February 1967, the first prototype (E1) conducted its maiden flight, powered by just the two Pegasus engines. During July 1967, the third prototype (E3), which was furnished with all ten of its engines, performed the first hovering flight. [4] During December 1967, forward-and-backward transitions between vertical and horizontal phases of flight were successfully conducted. On 28 February 1968, the first flight involving multiple transitions was performed. [4] According to aviation author Andrew Dow, while some initial teething issues were encountered, confidence in the aircraft grew quickly. [18] As the flight envelope was explored, test pilot Drury W. Wood performed several exploratory manoeuvres while flying the Do 31, on one occasion deliberately flying it backwards to prove it could be done and performing a barrel roll on another. [19]

Seeking to garner publicity for its new aircraft, Dornier flew one of the prototypes to the 1969 Paris Air Show, where it was demonstrated to the general public. The ferry flight to reach the event established multiple Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) world records for the type. [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] Public recognition was viewed as particularly valuable in light of Dornier's long-term ambitions for the Do 31, as the company foresaw civilian uses for the aircraft as a commercial VTOL transport. [25] At one point, Dornier was negotiating with both Douglas Aircraft and Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV) for involvement in the Do 31 programme, even rejecting one approach made by Douglas. [26]

Model of the unrealised prototype Do 131 Dornier Do131 RB162 VSTOL.jpg
Model of the unrealised prototype Do 131

The Do 31 was the first, and so far only, vertical takeoff jet transport ever built. During April 1970, it was announced that the project had been terminated, although the Do 31 performed its final public flight on 4 May 1970 during the Internationale Luft- und Raumfahrtausstellung (ILA) in Hannover. [27] One of the alleged contributing factors towards the Do 31's cancellation was the relatively large drag and weight imposed by the lift engine pods, which reduced both the useful payload and range of the type compared to conventional transport aircraft.[ citation needed ] According to Dow, the German government had been frustrated by a lack of commitment forthcoming from other NATO countries, and was unwilling to contribute alone to the high funding requirement needs for full-scale development. [28]

During a later stage of development, Dornier planned to dispense with the Do 31's outer nacelles and their engines; in their place, larger RB153 turbofan engines, each capable of generating approximately 5,000 lbf (22 kN) of thrust, would have been adopted once this powerplant had become available. A further development of the Do 31, referred to as the Do 131, intended to be powered by either twelve or fourteen liftjets, was also explored by Dornier; however, no prototype of this variant was ever constructed. [29] [28]

Aircraft on display

Do 31 E1 at the Dornier Museum Friedrichshafen Dornier Do-31 E1 (47659347462).jpg
Do 31 E1 at the Dornier Museum Friedrichshafen
Do 31 E3 at the Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim Do-31 2.jpg
Do 31 E3 at the Deutsches Museum Flugwerft Schleissheim

Both flying prototypes have been preserved in Germany, but the fate and current location of the non-flying testbed (E2) is not known.

Operators

Artist drawing Do31-1.jpg
Artist drawing
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany

Specifications (Do 31E)

Flight deck of the Do 31 Dornier Do 31 Cockpit.jpg
Flight deck of the Do 31

Data fromThe Observers Book of Aircraft. [32]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

A vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft is one that can take off and land vertically without relying on a runway. This classification can include a variety of types of aircraft including helicopters as well as thrust-vectoring fixed-wing aircraft and other hybrid aircraft with powered rotors such as cyclogyros/cyclocopters and gyrodynes.

Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werke (VFW) was a West German aerospace manufacturer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Pegasus</span> 1950s British turbofan aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce Pegasus, formerly the Bristol Siddeley Pegasus, is a British turbofan engine originally designed by Bristol Siddeley. It was manufactured by Rolls-Royce plc. The engine is not only able to power a jet aircraft forward, but also to direct thrust downwards via swivelling nozzles. Lightly loaded aircraft equipped with this engine can manoeuvre like a helicopter. In particular, they can perform vertical takeoffs and landings. In US service, the engine is designated F402.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell XV-15</span> American experimental tiltrotor aircraft

The Bell XV-15 is an American tiltrotor VTOL aircraft. It was the second successful experimental tiltrotor aircraft and the first to demonstrate the concept's high speed performance relative to conventional helicopters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">EWR VJ 101</span> Experimental aircraft by Entwicklungsring Süd

The EWR VJ 101 was an experimental German jet fighter vertical takeoff/landing (VTOL) tiltjet aircraft. VJ stood for Versuchsjäger,. The 101 was one of the first V/STOL designs to have the potential for eventual Mach 2 flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">VFW VAK 191B</span> Experimental strike fighter aircraft by VFW

The VFW VAK 191B was an experimental German vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) strike fighter of the early 1970s. VAK was the abbreviation for Vertikalstartendes Aufklärungs- und Kampfflugzeug. Designed and built by the Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werke (VFW), it was developed with the purpose of eventually serving as a replacement for the Italian Fiat G.91 then in service with the German Air Force. Operationally, it was intended to have been armed with nuclear weapons as a deterrent against aggression from the Soviet Union and, in the event of a major war breaking out, to survive the first wave of attacks by deploying to dispersed locations, rather than conventional airfields, and to retaliate against targets behind enemy lines.

A convertiplane is defined by the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale as an aircraft which uses rotor power for vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) and converts to fixed-wing lift in normal flight. In the US it is further classified as a sub-type of powered lift. In popular usage it sometimes includes any aircraft that converts in flight to change its method of obtaining lift.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dornier Do 27</span> Utility/STOL aircraft

The Dornier Do 27 is a German single-engine STOL utility aircraft that was designed and manufactured by Dornier GmbH. It was notable for being the first mass-produced aircraft in Germany following the end of the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Short SC.1</span> British experimental VTOL aircraft

The Short SC.1 was the first British fixed-wing vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) jet aircraft. It was developed by Short Brothers. It was powered by an arrangement of five Rolls-Royce RB.108 turbojets, four of which were used for vertical flight and one for conventional horizontal flight. The SC.1 had the distinction of being the first British fixed-wing VTOL aircraft and the first one to transition between vertical and horizontal flight modes; it was also the first VTOL-capable aircraft with a fly-by-wire control system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce RB.108</span> 1950s British turbojet aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce RB.108 was a British jet engine designed in the mid-1950s by Rolls-Royce specifically for use as a VTOL lift engine. It was also used to provide horizontal thrust in the Short SC.1.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armstrong Whitworth AW.681</span> 1960s British military transport aircraft design study

The Armstrong Whitworth AW.681, also known as the Whitworth Gloster 681 or Hawker Siddeley HS.681, was a projected British long-range STOL military transport aircraft design of the early 1960s. Developed by manufacturer Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft, it was intended to be capable of achieving both Short Takeoff and Landing (STOL) and Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce RB.162</span> 1960s British turbojet aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce RB.162 is a lightweight British turbojet engine produced by Rolls-Royce Limited. Developed in the early 1960s, it was specially designed for use as a lift engine for VTOL aircraft but was also used in a later variant of the Hawker Siddeley Trident airliner as an auxiliary boost engine. A smaller related variant, the RB.181 remained a design project only, as did a turbofan version designated RB.175.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tiltjet</span>

A tiltjet is an aircraft propulsion configuration that was historically tested for proposed vertical take-off and landing (VTOL)-capable fighters.

The Rolls-Royce/MAN Turbo RB.153 was a high-performance 6,850 pounds-force (3,110 kgf) dry thrust turbofan engine developed jointly by Rolls-Royce Limited and MAN Turbo. Developed for the German EWR VJ 101D interceptor with a German-developed thrust-deflector system. The engine was also proposed for a number of other military VTOL projects including the Hawker P.1157 and Dornier Do 31. A commercial-version of the engine was also considered for the Messerschmitt Me P.160 airliner. The VJ101D project was cancelled and the engine never flew, being retained as a test bed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawker Siddeley HS.141</span> 1970s British airliner design study

The Hawker Siddeley HS.141 was a 1970s design study and submission for a British V/STOL airliner requirement. Designed by Hawker Siddeley Aviation and tested in wind tunnels neither prototypes nor production aircraft were produced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Focke Rochen</span> Type of aircraft

The Focke Rochen, also known as Focke-Wulf Schnellflugzeug or Focke-Wulf VTOL was a German VTOL aircraft project. Designed by Heinrich Focke of the Focke-Wulf company towards the end of World War II, the project remained unbuilt before the surrender of Nazi Germany, but saw some development in the postwar years. The information about this project is limited; it was named after the ray owing to its unusual shape. The aircraft had an airfoil section with two huge propellers in the center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NBMR-3</span>

NBMR-3 or NATO Basic Military Requirement 3 was a document produced by a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) committee in the early 1960s detailing the specification of future combat aircraft designs. The requirement was for aircraft in two performance groups, supersonic fighter aircraft (NBMR-3a) and subsonic fighter-bomber aircraft (NBMR-3b). Both requirements specifically stated the need for V/STOL performance as the contemporary fear was that airfields could be overrun or disabled through Eastern Bloc hostile actions and that dispersed operating bases would be needed. Germany was planning replacements for the Fiat G.91 and Lockheed F-104G Starfighter using the new aircraft types.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tethered flight test</span>

A tethered flight test is a type of flight testing where a machine is connected by a tether to the ground. Tethered testing may be used when motion through the atmosphere is not required to sustain flight, such as for airship; vertical take-off and landing (VTOL), rotary wing or tiltwing aircraft ; or for tests of certain rockets, such as vertical takeoff, vertical landing (VTVL). Fixed wing scale models can be tested on a tether in a wind tunnel, simulating motion through the atmosphere.

The Dornier Do 231 was a 1970s VTOL transport aircraft project developed by Dornier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">VFW SG 1262 Schwebegestell</span> 1960s German experimental aircraft

The German VFW SG 1262Schwebegestell was designed and built in 1965 by Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werke (VFW) as an experimental aircraft to assist with the development of several vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) military aircraft types that included the VFW VAK 191B, the EWR VJ 101 and the Dornier Do 31 transport. The 1262 designation relates to the initial numbering of the VAK 191B project by Focke-Wulf.

References

Notes

  1. By the time of the first flight, Rolls-Royce had taken over Bristol Engines.

Citations

  1. Jackson 1976, p. 143.
  2. 1 2 Jackson 1976, p. 29.
  3. 1 2 3 Dow 2009, p. 233.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Hirschel, Prem and Madelung 2012, p. 375.
  5. Hirschel, Prem and Madelung 2012, p. 380.
  6. Hirschel, Prem and Madelung 2012, p. 611.
  7. Dow 2009, pp. 237-238.
  8. "The Dornier DO-960 Analog Computer." vaxman.de, Retrieved: 5 August 2019.
  9. Dow 2009, p. 239.
  10. Hoffert, Fritz. "The Dornier DO 31 Jet-Lift Concept, A Light Military Transport with VTOL Capability." SAE Technical Paper 640229, 1964.
  11. Dow 2009, p. 236.
  12. Dow 2009, pp. 233-234.
  13. Dow 2009, p. 234.
  14. Dow 2009, pp. 234-235.
  15. Dow 2009, p. 246.
  16. Dow 2009, pp. 246-247.
  17. Dow 2009, p. 247.
  18. Dow 2009, pp. 246-248.
  19. Dow 2009, pp. 248-249.
  20. "FAI Record ID #5536 - Speed over a recognized course, München - Paris. Class H (VTOL aircraft) [ permanent dead link ]" Fédération Aéronautique Internationale Record date 27 May 1969. Accessed: 4 October 2015.
  21. "FAI Record ID #15153 - Speed, München - Paris. Class H (VTOL aircraft) Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine " Fédération Aéronautique Internationale Record date 27 May 1969. Accessed: 4 October 2015.
  22. "FAI Record ID #15151 - Altitude, München - Paris. Class H (VTOL aircraft) Archived 2016-03-06 at the Wayback Machine " Fédération Aéronautique Internationale Record date 27 May 1969. Accessed: 4 October 2015.
  23. "FAI Record ID #15152 - Duration, München - Paris. Class H (VTOL aircraft) [ permanent dead link ]" Fédération Aéronautique Internationale Record date 27 May 1969. Accessed: 4 October 2015.
  24. "FAI Record ID #6370 - Distance, München - Paris. Class H (VTOL aircraft) Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine " Fédération Aéronautique Internationale Record date 27 May 1969. Accessed: 4 October 2015.
  25. Dow 2009, p. 250.
  26. Dow 2009, pp. 250-251.
  27. Hirschel, Prem and Madelung 2012, pp. 375-376.
  28. 1 2 Dow 2009, p. 253.
  29. Dornier: die Chronik des ältesten deutschen Flugzeugwerks. Dornier GmbH (Friedrichshafen). Aviatic-Verlag, 1985.
  30. Dornier Museum press release (German language) Archived July 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved: 9 August 2009.
  31. Deutsches Museum, Do 31 Archived 2015-04-28 at the Wayback Machine www.deutsches-museum.de Retrieved: 5 April 2010.
  32. Green, 1968. p. 88.

Bibliography