In general topology and related areas of mathematics, the **final topology** (or **coinduced**,^{ [1] }**strong**, **colimit**, or **inductive** topology) on a set with respect to a family of functions from topological spaces into is the finest topology on that makes all those functions continuous.

- Definition
- Examples
- Properties
- Characterization via continuous maps
- Behavior under composition
- Effects of changing the family of maps
- Coherence with subspaces
- Final topology on the direct limit of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces
- Categorical description
- See also
- Notes
- Citations
- References

The quotient topology on a quotient space is a final topology, with respect to a single surjective function, namely the quotient map. The disjoint union topology is the final topology with respect to the inclusion maps. The final topology is also the topology that every direct limit in the category of topological spaces is endowed with, and it is in the context of direct limits that the final topology often appears. A topology is coherent with some collection of subspaces if and only if it is the final topology induced by the natural inclusions.

The dual notion is the initial topology, which for a given family of functions from a set into topological spaces is the coarsest topology on that makes those functions continuous.

Given a set and an -indexed family of topological spaces with associated functions

the * final topology on induced by these maps * is the finest topology on such that

is continuous for each .

Explicitly, the final topology may be described as follows:

- a subset of is open in the final topology (that is, ) if and only if is open in for each .

The closed subsets have an analogous characterization:

- a subset of is closed in the final topology if and only if is closed in for each .

The important special case where the family of maps consists of a single surjective map can be completely characterized using the notion of quotient maps. A surjective function between topological spaces is a quotient map if and only if the topology on coincides with the final topology induced by the family . In particular: the quotient topology is the final topology on the quotient space induced by the quotient map.

The final topology on a set induced by a family of -valued maps can be viewed as a far reaching generalization of the quotient topology, where multiple maps may be used instead of just one and where these maps are not required to be surjections.

Given topological spaces , the disjoint union topology on the disjoint union is the final topology on the disjoint union induced by the natural injections.

Given a family of topologies on a fixed set the final topology on with respect to the identity maps as ranges over call it is the infimum (or meet) of these topologies in the lattice of topologies on That is, the final topology is equal to the intersection

The direct limit of any direct system of spaces and continuous maps is the set-theoretic direct limit together with the final topology determined by the canonical morphisms. Explicitly, this means that if is a direct system in the category **Top** of topological spaces and if is a direct limit of in the category **Set** of all sets, then by endowing with the final topology induced by becomes the direct limit of in the category **Top**.

The étalé space of a sheaf is topologized by a final topology.

A first-countable Hausdorff space is locally path-connected if and only if is equal to the final topology on induced by the set of all continuous maps where any such map is called a path in

If a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space is a Fréchet-Urysohn space then is equal to the final topology on induced by the set of all arcs in which by definition are continuous paths that are also topological embeddings.

Given functions from topological spaces to the set , the final topology on can be characterized by the following property:

- a function from to some space is continuous if and only if is continuous for each

Suppose is a family of maps, and for every the topology on is the final topology induced by some family of maps valued in . Then the final topology on induced by is equal to the final topology on induced by the maps

As a consequence: if is the final topology on induced by the family and if is any surjective map valued in some topological space then is a quotient map if and only if has the final topology induced by the maps

By the universal property of the disjoint union topology we know that given any family of continuous maps there is a unique continuous map

that is compatible with the natural injections. If the family of maps *covers* (i.e. each lies in the image of some ) then the map will be a quotient map if and only if has the final topology induced by the maps

Throughout, let be a family of -valued maps with each map being of the form and let denote the final topology on induced by The definition of the final topology guarantees that for every index the map is continuous.

For any subset the final topology on will be *finer* than (and possibly equal to) the topology ; that is, implies where set equality might hold even if is a proper subset of

If is any topology on such that for all is continuous but then is *strictly coarser* then (in symbols, which means and ) and moreover, for any subset because the topology will also be *strictly coarser* than the final topology induced on by that is

Suppose that in addition, is a family of -valued maps whose domains are topological spaces If every is continuous then adding these maps to the family will *not* change the final topology on that is, Explicitly, this means that the final topology on induced by the "extended family" is equal to the final topology induced by the original family However, had there instead existed even just one map such that was *not* continuous, then the final topology on induced by the "extended family" would necessarily be *strictly coarser* than the final topology induced by that is, (see this footnote^{ [note 1] } for an explanation).

Let be a topological space and let be a family of subspaces of where importantly, the word "sub** space**" is used to indicate that each subset is endowed with the subspace topology inherited from The space is said to be

Unraveling the definition, is coherent with if and only if the following statement is true:

- for every subset is open in if and only if for every is open in the subspace

Closed sets can be checked instead: is coherent with if and only if for every subset is closed in if and only if for every is closed in

For example, if is a cover of a topological space by open subspaces (i.e. open subsets of endowed with the subspace topology) then is coherent with In contrast, if is the set of all singleton subsets of (each set being endowed with its unique topology) then is coherent with if and only if is the discrete topology on The disjoint union is the final topology with respect to the family of canonical injections. A space is called ** compactly generated ** and a

As demonstrated by the examples that follows, under certain circumstance, it may be possible to characterize a more general final topology in terms of coherence with subspaces. Let be a family of -valued maps with each map being of the form and let denote the final topology on induced by Suppose that is a topology on and for every index the image is endowed with the subspace topology inherited from If for every the map is a quotient map then if and only if is coherent with the set of all images

Let

denote the ** space of finite sequences **, where denotes the space of all real sequences. For every natural number let denote the usual Euclidean space endowed with the Euclidean topology and let denote the inclusion map defined by so that its image is

and consequently,

Endow the set with the final topology induced by the family of all inclusion maps. With this topology, becomes a complete Hausdorff locally convex sequential topological vector space that is *not* a Fréchet–Urysohn space. The topology is strictly finer than the subspace topology induced on by where is endowed with its usual product topology. Endow the image with the final topology induced on it by the bijection that is, it is endowed with the Euclidean topology transferred to it from via This topology on is equal to the subspace topology induced on it by A subset is open (resp. closed) in if and only if for every the set is an open (resp. closed) subset of The topology is coherent with family of subspaces This makes into an LB-space. Consequently, if and is a sequence in then in if and only if there exists some such that both and are contained in and in

Often, for every the inclusion map is used to identify with its image in explicitly, the elements and are identified together. Under this identification, becomes a direct limit of the direct system where for every the map is the inclusion map defined by where there are trailing zeros.

In the language of category theory, the final topology construction can be described as follows. Let be a functor from a discrete category to the category of topological spaces **Top** that selects the spaces for Let be the diagonal functor from **Top** to the functor category **Top**^{J} (this functor sends each space to the constant functor to ). The comma category is then the category of co-cones from i.e. objects in are pairs where is a family of continuous maps to If is the forgetful functor from **Top** to **Set** and Δ′ is the diagonal functor from **Set** to **Set**^{J} then the comma category is the category of all co-cones from The final topology construction can then be described as a functor from to This functor is left adjoint to the corresponding forgetful functor.

- Direct limit
- Induced topology
- Initial topology – coarsest topology making certain functions continuous
- LB-space
- LF-space

- ↑ By definition, the map not being continuous means that there exists at least one open set such that is not open in In contrast, by definition of the final topology the map
*must*be continuous. So the reason why must be strictly coarser, rather than strictly finer, than is because the failure of the map to be continuous necessitates that one or more open subsets of must be "removed" in order for to become continuous. Thus is just but some open sets "removed" from

- ↑ Singh, Tej Bahadur (May 5, 2013). "Elements of Topology".
*Books.Google.com*. CRC Press. Retrieved July 21, 2020.

In mathematics, a **continuous function** is a function that does not have any abrupt changes in value, known as discontinuities. More precisely, a function is continuous if arbitrarily small changes in its output can be assured by restricting to sufficiently small changes in its input. If not continuous, a function is said to be *discontinuous*. Up until the 19th century, mathematicians largely relied on intuitive notions of continuity, during which attempts such as the epsilon–delta definition were made to formalize it.

In mathematics, **open sets** are a generalization of open intervals in the real line. In a metric space—that is, when a distance is defined—open sets are the sets that, with every point P, contain all points that are sufficiently near to P.

In mathematics, a **topological vector space** is one of the basic structures investigated in functional analysis. A topological vector space is a vector space which is also a topological space, this implies that vector space operations be continuous functions. More specifically, its topological space has a uniform topological structure, allowing a notion of uniform convergence.

**Distributions**, also known as **Schwartz distributions** or **generalized functions**, are objects that generalize the classical notion of functions in mathematical analysis. Distributions make it possible to differentiate functions whose derivatives do not exist in the classical sense. In particular, any locally integrable function has a distributional derivative. Distributions are widely used in the theory of partial differential equations, where it may be easier to establish the existence of distributional solutions than classical solutions, or appropriate classical solutions may not exist. Distributions are also important in physics and engineering where many problems naturally lead to differential equations whose solutions or initial conditions are distributions, such as the Dirac delta function.

In mathematics, more specifically in topology, an **open map** is a function between two topological spaces that maps open sets to open sets. That is, a function is open if for any open set in the image is open in Likewise, a **closed map** is a function that maps closed sets to closed sets. A map may be open, closed, both, or neither; in particular, an open map need not be closed and vice versa.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, **locally convex topological vector spaces** (**LCTVS**) or **locally convex spaces** are examples of topological vector spaces (TVS) that generalize normed spaces. They can be defined as topological vector spaces whose topology is generated by translations of balanced, absorbent, convex sets. Alternatively they can be defined as a vector space with a family of seminorms, and a topology can be defined in terms of that family. Although in general such spaces are not necessarily normable, the existence of a convex local base for the zero vector is strong enough for the Hahn–Banach theorem to hold, yielding a sufficiently rich theory of continuous linear functionals.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a **sequence space** is a vector space whose elements are infinite sequences of real or complex numbers. Equivalently, it is a function space whose elements are functions from the natural numbers to the field *K* of real or complex numbers. The set of all such functions is naturally identified with the set of all possible infinite sequences with elements in *K*, and can be turned into a vector space under the operations of pointwise addition of functions and pointwise scalar multiplication. All sequence spaces are linear subspaces of this space. Sequence spaces are typically equipped with a norm, or at least the structure of a topological vector space.

In mathematics, particularly in functional analysis, a **bornological space** is a type of space which, in some sense, possesses the minimum amount of structure needed to address questions of boundedness of sets and linear maps, in the same way that a topological space possesses the minimum amount of structure needed to address questions of continuity. Bornological spaces are distinguished by that property that a linear map from a bornological space into any locally convex spaces is continuous if and only if it is a bounded linear operator.

In topology and related fields of mathematics, a **sequential space** is a topological space that satisfies a very weak axiom of countability.

In the field of topology, a **Fréchet–Urysohn space** is a topological space with the property that for every subset the closure of in is identical to the *sequential* closure of in Fréchet–Urysohn spaces are a special type of sequential space.

In topology, a subfield of mathematics, *filters* are special families of subsets of a set that can be used to study topological spaces and define all basic topological notions such a convergence, continuity, compactness, and more. Filters also provide a common framework for defining various types of limits of functions such as limits from the left/right, to infinity, to a point or a set, and many others. Special types of filters called *ultrafilters* have many useful technical properties and they may often be used in place of arbitrary filters.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a **complete topological vector space** is a topological vector space (TVS) with the property that whenever points get progressively closer to each other, then there exists some point towards which they all get closer to. The notion of "points that get progressively closer" is made rigorous by *Cauchy nets* or *Cauchy filters*, which are generalizations of *Cauchy sequences*, while "point towards which they all get closer to" means that this net or filter converges to Unlike the notion of completeness for metric spaces, which it generalizes, the notion of completeness for TVSs does not depend on any metric and is defined for *all* TVSs, including those that are not metrizable or Hausdorff.

The theorem on the **surjection of Fréchet spaces** is an important theorem, due to Stefan Banach, that characterizes when a continuous linear operator between Fréchet spaces is surjective.

In mathematics, the **injective tensor product** of two topological vector spaces (TVSs) was introduced by Alexander Grothendieck and was used by him to define nuclear spaces. An injective tensor product is in general not necessarily complete, so its completion is called the *completed injective tensor products*. Injective tensor products have applications outside of nuclear spaces. In particular, as described below, up to TVS-isomorphism, many TVSs that are defined for real or complex valued functions, for instance, the Schwartz space or the space of continuously differentiable functions, can be immediately extended to functions valued in a Hausdorff locally convex TVS Y with*out* any need to extend definitions from real/complex-valued functions to Y-valued functions.

The strongest locally convex topological vector space (TVS) topology on , the tensor product of two locally convex TVSs, making the canonical map *separately* continuous is called the **inductive topology** or the **ι-topology**. When *X ⊗ Y* is endowed with this topology then it is denoted by and called the **inductive tensor product** of *X* and *Y*.

In the field of functional analysis, a subfield of mathematics, a **dual system**, **dual pair**, or a **duality** over a field is a triple consisting of two vector spaces over and a bilinear map such that for all non-zero the map is not identically and for all non-zero the map is not identically 0. The study of dual systems is called **duality theory**.

In mathematics, an ** LB-space**, also written

In functional analysis, a **topological homomorphism** or simply **homomorphism** is the analog of homomorphisms for the category of topological vector spaces (TVSs). This concept is of considerable importance in functional analysis and the famous open mapping theorem gives a sufficient condition for a continuous linear map between Fréchet spaces to be a topological homomorphism.

In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, a **metrizable** topological vector space (TVS) is a TVS whose topology is induced by a metric. An **LM-space** is an inductive limit of a sequence of locally convex metrizable TVS.

In mathematics, specifically topology, a **sequence covering map** is any of a class of maps between topological spaces whose definitions all somehow relate sequences in the codomain with sequences in the domain. Examples include *sequentially quotient* maps, *sequence coverings*, *1-sequence coverings*, and *2-sequence coverings*. These classes of maps are closely related to sequential spaces. If the domain and/or codomain have certain additional topological properties then these definitions become equivalent to other well-known classes of maps, such as open maps or quotient maps, for example. In these situations, characterizations of such properties in terms of convergent sequences might provide benefits similar to those provided by, say for instance, the characterization of continuity in terms of sequential continuity or the characterization of compactness in terms of sequential compactness.

- Willard, Stephen (1970).
*General Topology*. Addison-Wesley Series in Mathematics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Zbl 0205.26601..*(Provides a short, general introduction in section 9 and Exercise 9H)* - Willard, Stephen (2004) [1970].
*General Topology*. Dover Books on Mathematics (First ed.). Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-43479-7. OCLC 115240.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.