In mathematics, a **direct limit** is a way to construct a (typically large) object from many (typically smaller) objects that are put together in a specific way. These objects may be groups, rings, vector spaces or in general objects from any category. The way they are put together is specified by a system of homomorphisms (group homomorphism, ring homomorphism, or in general morphisms in the category) between those smaller objects. The direct limit of the objects , where ranges over some directed set , is denoted by . (This is a slight abuse of notation as it suppresses the system of homomorphisms that is crucial for the structure of the limit.)

- Formal definition
- Direct limits of algebraic objects
- Direct limits in an arbitrary category
- Examples
- Properties
- Related constructions and generalizations
- Terminology
- See also
- Notes
- References

Direct limits are a special case of the concept of colimit in category theory. Direct limits are dual to inverse limits which are also a special case of limits in category theory.

We will first give the definition for algebraic structures like groups and modules, and then the general definition, which can be used in any category.

In this section objects are understood to consist of underlying sets with a given algebraic structure, such as groups, rings, modules (over a fixed ring), algebras (over a fixed field), etc. With this in mind, * homomorphisms * are understood in the corresponding setting (group homomorphisms, etc.).

Let be a directed set. Let be a family of objects indexed by and be a homomorphism for all with the following properties:

- is the identity of , and
- for all .

Then the pair is called a direct system over .

The **direct limit** of the direct system is denoted by and is defined as follows. Its underlying set is the disjoint union of the 's modulo a certain equivalence relation :

Here, if and , then iff there is some with and and such that . Heuristically, two elements in the disjoint union are equivalent if and only if they "eventually become equal" in the direct system. An equivalent formulation that highlights the duality to the inverse limit is that an element is equivalent to all its images under the maps of the direct system, i.e. whenever .

One naturally obtains from this definition *canonical functions* sending each element to its equivalence class. The algebraic operations on are defined such that these maps become homomorphisms. Formally, the direct limit of the direct system consists of the object together with the canonical homomorphisms .

The direct limit can be defined in an arbitrary category by means of a universal property. Let be a direct system of objects and morphisms in (as defined above). A *target* is a pair where is an object in and are morphisms for each such that whenever . A direct limit of the direct system is a *universally repelling target* in the sense that is a target and for each target , there is a unique morphism such that for each *i*. The following diagram

will then commute for all *i*, *j*.

The direct limit is often denoted

with the direct system and the canonical morphisms being understood.

Unlike for algebraic objects, not every direct system in an arbitrary category has a direct limit. If it does, however, the direct limit is unique in a strong sense: given another direct limit *X*′ there exists a *unique* isomorphism *X*′ → *X* that commutes with the canonical morphisms.

- A collection of subsets of a set can be partially ordered by inclusion. If the collection is directed, its direct limit is the union . The same is true for a directed collection of subgroups of a given group, or a directed collection of subrings of a given ring, etc.
- Let be any directed set with a greatest element . The direct limit of any corresponding direct system is isomorphic to and the canonical morphism is an isomorphism.
- Let
*K*be a field. For a positive integer*n*, consider the general linear group GL(*n;K*) consisting of invertible*n*x*n*- matrices with entries from*K*. We have a group homomorphism GL(*n;K*) → GL(*n*+1;*K*) which enlarges matrices by putting a 1 in the lower right corner and zeros elsewhere in the last row and column. The direct limit of this system is the general linear group of*K*, written as GL(*K*). An element of GL(*K*) can be thought off as an infinite invertible matrix which differs from the infinite identity matrix in only finitely many entries. The group GL(*K*) is of vital importance in algebraic K-theory. - Let
*p*be a prime number. Consider the direct system composed of the factor groups and the homomorphisms induced by multiplication by . The direct limit of this system consists of all the roots of unity of order some power of , and is called the Prüfer group . - There is a (non-obvious) injective ring homomorphism from the ring of symmetric polynomials in variables to the ring of symmetric polynomials in variables. Forming the direct limit of this direct system yields the ring of symmetric functions.
- Let
*F*be a*C*-valued sheaf on a topological space*X*. Fix a point*x*in*X*. The open neighborhoods of*x*form a directed set ordered by inclusion (*U*≤*V*if and only if*U*contains*V*). The corresponding direct system is (*F*(*U*),*r*_{U,V}) where*r*is the restriction map. The direct limit of this system is called the*stalk*of*F*at*x*, denoted*F*_{x}. For each neighborhood*U*of*x*, the canonical morphism*F*(*U*) →*F*_{x}associates to a section*s*of*F*over*U*an element*s*_{x}of the stalk*F*_{x}called the*germ*of*s*at*x*. - Direct limits in the category of topological spaces are given by placing the final topology on the underlying set-theoretic direct limit.
- An ind-scheme is an inductive limit of schemes.

Direct limits are linked to inverse limits via

An important property is that taking direct limits in the category of modules is an exact functor. This means that if you start with a directed system of short exact sequences and form direct limits, you obtain a short exact sequence .

We note that a direct system in a category admits an alternative description in terms of functors. Any directed set can be considered as a small category whose objects are the elements and there is a morphisms if and only if . A direct system over is then the same as a covariant functor . The colimit of this functor is the same as the direct limit of the original direct system.

A notion closely related to direct limits are the filtered colimits. Here we start with a covariant functor from a filtered category to some category and form the colimit of this functor. One can show that a category has all directed limits if and only if it has all filtered colimits, and a functor defined on such a category commutes with all direct limits if and only if it commutes with all filtered colimits.^{ [1] }

Given an arbitrary category , there may be direct systems in which don't have a direct limit in (consider for example the category of finite sets, or the category of finitely generated abelian groups). In this case, we can always embed into a category in which all direct limits exist; the objects of are called ind-objects of .

The categorical dual of the direct limit is called the inverse limit. As above, inverse limits can be viewed as limits of certain functors and are closely related to limits over cofiltered categories.

In the literature, one finds the terms "directed limit", "direct inductive limit", "directed colimit", "direct colimit" and "inductive limit" for the concept of direct limit defined above. The term "inductive limit" is ambiguous however, as some authors use it for the general concept of colimit.

- ↑ Adamek, J.; Rosicky, J. (1994).
*Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories*. Cambridge University Press. p. 15.

In mathematics, specifically category theory, a **functor** is a mapping between categories. Functors were first considered in algebraic topology, where algebraic objects are associated to topological spaces, and maps between these algebraic objects are associated to continuous maps between spaces. Nowadays, functors are used throughout modern mathematics to relate various categories. Thus, functors are important in all areas within mathematics to which category theory is applied.

In mathematics, the **inverse limit** is a construction that allows one to "glue together" several related objects, the precise manner of the gluing process being specified by morphisms between the objects. Inverse limits can be defined in any category, and they are a special case of the concept of a limit in category theory.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the abstract notion of a **limit** captures the essential properties of universal constructions such as products, pullbacks and inverse limits. The dual notion of a **colimit** generalizes constructions such as disjoint unions, direct sums, coproducts, pushouts and direct limits.

**Distributions**, also known as **Schwartz distributions** or **generalized functions**, are objects that generalize the classical notion of functions in mathematical analysis. Distributions make it possible to differentiate functions whose derivatives do not exist in the classical sense. In particular, any locally integrable function has a distributional derivative. Distributions are widely used in the theory of partial differential equations, where it may be easier to establish the existence of distributional solutions than classical solutions, or appropriate classical solutions may not exist. Distributions are also important in physics and engineering where many problems naturally lead to differential equations whose solutions or initial conditions are distributions, such as the Dirac delta function.

In mathematics, specifically category theory, **adjunction** is a relationship that two functors may have. Two functors that stand in this relationship are known as **adjoint functors**, one being the **left adjoint** and the other the **right adjoint**. Pairs of adjoint functors are ubiquitous in mathematics and often arise from constructions of "optimal solutions" to certain problems, such as the construction of a free group on a set in algebra, or the construction of the Stone–Čech compactification of a topological space in topology.

In mathematics, specifically in category theory, a **pre-abelian category** is an additive category that has all kernels and cokernels.

In mathematics, a **comma category** is a construction in category theory. It provides another way of looking at morphisms: instead of simply relating objects of a category to one another, morphisms become objects in their own right. This notion was introduced in 1963 by F. W. Lawvere, although the technique did not become generally known until many years later. Several mathematical concepts can be treated as comma categories. Comma categories also guarantee the existence of some limits and colimits. The name comes from the notation originally used by Lawvere, which involved the comma punctuation mark. The name persists even though standard notation has changed, since the use of a comma as an operator is potentially confusing, and even Lawvere dislikes the uninformative term "comma category".

In mathematics, particularly category theory, a **representable functor** is a certain functor from an arbitrary category into the category of sets. Such functors give representations of an abstract category in terms of known structures allowing one to utilize, as much as possible, knowledge about the category of sets in other settings.

In mathematics, the **derived category***D*(*A*) of an abelian category *A* is a construction of homological algebra introduced to refine and in a certain sense to simplify the theory of derived functors defined on *A*. The construction proceeds on the basis that the objects of *D*(*A*) should be chain complexes in *A*, with two such chain complexes considered isomorphic when there is a chain map that induces an isomorphism on the level of homology of the chain complexes. Derived functors can then be defined for chain complexes, refining the concept of hypercohomology. The definitions lead to a significant simplification of formulas otherwise described by complicated spectral sequences.

This is a glossary of properties and concepts in category theory in mathematics.

In category theory, monoidal functors are functors between monoidal categories which preserve the monoidal structure. More specifically, a monoidal functor between two monoidal categories consists of a functor between the categories, along with two *coherence maps*—a natural transformation and a morphism that preserve monoidal multiplication and unit, respectively. Mathematicians require these coherence maps to satisfy additional properties depending on how strictly they want to preserve the monoidal structure; each of these properties gives rise to a slightly different definition of monoidal functors

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the **diagonal functor** is given by , which maps objects as well as morphisms. This functor can be employed to give a succinct alternate description of the product of objects *within* the category : a product is a universal arrow from to . The arrow comprises the projection maps.

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a **presheaf** on a category is a functor . If is the poset of open sets in a topological space, interpreted as a category, then one recovers the usual notion of presheaf on a topological space.

In mathematics, specifically in algebraic topology and algebraic geometry, an **inverse image functor** is a contravariant construction of sheaves; here “contravariant” in the sense given a map , the inverse image functor is a functor from the category of sheaves on *Y* to the category of sheaves on *X*. The direct image functor is the primary operation on sheaves, with the simplest definition. The inverse image exhibits some relatively subtle features.

In category theory, a **span**, **roof** or **correspondence** is a generalization of the notion of relation between two objects of a category. When the category has all pullbacks, spans can be considered as morphisms in a category of fractions.

The **Grothendieck construction** is a construction used in the mathematical field of category theory.

In mathematics, an **approximately finite-dimensional (AF) C*-algebra** is a C*-algebra that is the inductive limit of a sequence of finite-dimensional C*-algebras. Approximate finite-dimensionality was first defined and described combinatorially by Ola Bratteli. Later, George A. Elliott gave a complete classification of AF algebras using the *K*_{0} functor whose range consists of ordered abelian groups with sufficiently nice order structure.

In mathematics, a **Grothendieck category** is a certain kind of abelian category, introduced in Alexander Grothendieck's Tôhoku paper of 1957 in order to develop the machinery of homological algebra for modules and for sheaves in a unified manner. The theory of these categories was further developed in Pierre Gabriel's seminal thesis in 1962.

In Category theory and related fields of mathematics, an **envelope** is a construction that generalizes the operations of "exterior completion", like completion of a locally convex space, or Stone–Čech compactification of a topological space. A dual construction is called refinement.

In mathematics, the **ind-completion** or **ind-construction** is the process of freely adding filtered colimits to a given category *C*. The objects in this ind-completed category, denoted Ind(*C*), are known as **direct systems**, they are functors from a small filtered category *I* to *C*.

- Bourbaki, Nicolas (1968),
*Elements of mathematics. Theory of sets*, Translated from French, Paris: Hermann, MR 0237342 - Mac Lane, Saunders (1998),
*Categories for the Working Mathematician*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,**5**(2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.