Indo-Pacific Economic Framework

Last updated
Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity
Indo-Pacific Economic Framework members.svg
Members of IPEF
TypeEconomic initiative
Membership14 countries

The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) is an economic initiative launched by U.S. President Joe Biden on May 23, 2022. [1] [2] The framework launched with fourteen participating founding member nations in the Indo-Pacific region with an open invitation for other countries to join.

Contents

Background

Obama and Trump administration policies

During the presidency of Barack Obama (with Joe Biden as vice president), the United States negotiated a trade proposal with twelve Pacific Rim countries that would become known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In 2015, the Obama administration pitched the proposal as a means to promote American economic interests in the region in the face of a rising China. [3] [4]

Following his election in 2016 and subsequent inauguration, then-President Donald Trump issued an executive order pulling the United States out of the TPP, which had not been ratified by Congress. [5] In 2018, the eleven remaining countries in the TPP went on to sign a revised version of the agreement, known as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. [6]

Biden administration policy

Prior to the launch of the IPEF, critics argued that the U.S. was engaged in an “all guns and no butter” strategy, in which defense was emphasized over regional economic policy. [7]

Commentators have described the IPEF as being part of the Biden administration's efforts to counter growing Chinese influence in the region. [8] [9] According to the Financial Times , countries in the region urged the Biden administration to develop an international economic policy framework to combat China's influence.

Analysts have compared it to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which the United States withdrew from in 2017. [10] The Biden administration stated that it has no intention to join TPP's successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. [11] : 178  The IPEF is intended to be a precursor for later negotiations, as it does not include a uniform lowering of tariffs. [7]

On 22 May 2022, the Biden administration issued a 12-paragraph IPEF. [11] : 178  Biden described the initiative as "writing the new rules for the 21st century economy", stating that the agreement would make the participant's economies "grow faster and fairer". Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo argued that the framework constituted "the most significant international economic engagement that the United States has ever had in this region". [12]

The pact has been described as being "hollow", "meaningless" or "useless" by some commentators, including US industry groups, due to its lack of tangible policy actions such as lowering tariffs. [13] [14] [15] Writing in 2022, academics Xinru Ma and David C. Kang described IPEF as lacking concrete proposals. [11] : 178 

Supply Chains

The Agreement Relating to Supply Chain Resilience was signed in November 2023, and entered into force in February 2024. [16] The agreement establishes the Supply Chain Council, the Crisis Response Network and the Labor Rights Advisory Board to address supply chain resilience. [17]

Clean Economy

The Clean Economy Agreement was signed in June 2024, and entered into force on October 11, 2024. The agreement includes measures on developing and deploying clean energy and climate-friendly technologies, facilitating investment towards climate-related projects in the region, connecting markets through policies and standards, and promoting low-and zero-emission goods and services.

Fair Economy

The Fair Economy Agreement was signed in June 2024, and entered into force on October 12, 2024. The agreement aims to prevent and combat corruption and to improve tax transparency and the exchange of information, domestic resource mobilization, and tax administration.

Trade

In November 2023, the United States halted plans for the IPEF's trade component. [18] The Biden administration had intended to conclude the negotiations during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, but reversed course following opposition from Democratic members of Congress including Sherrod Brown. [18]

Participating nations

Summit-level meeting on the launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, 23 May 2022 20220523 Fumio Kishida and Joe Biden 25.jpg
Summit-level meeting on the launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, 23 May 2022

Nations included in the framework

The IPEF has fourteen participating member states, representing around 40% of the world's GDP. [19] Seven members of the IPEF are ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) member states. [20]

The 14th and most recent entry into the IPEF was Fiji, which was welcomed into the framework on May 27, 2023 as the first Pacific Island nation to join. [21] Including the United States, the following member countries joined in the framework:

Member countries with the four largest GDPs:

Countries in Oceania:

ASEAN member states:

Excluded or potential entrant nations

The following non-participating nations were subject to media attention surrounding their potential involvement in the IPEF:

International reactions

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi criticized the initiative as an attempt to further economic decoupling from China. Wang Yi argued that the initiative, and the US Indo-Pacific strategy as a whole, created divisions and "incited confrontation". Wang stated that such an agreement would "ultimately be a failure". [28]

Many analysts have criticized the lack of inclusion of Taiwan in the framework, with Taiwan News calling the lack of inclusion a "snub". [29] An opinion piece published in The Hill asserted that Taiwan was excluded in order to appease key "fence-sitter" countries such as Indonesia whose governments feared angering China. [30]

Biden with Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida 20220523 Fumio Kishida and Joe Biden 24.jpg
Biden with Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad criticized the grouping as an initiative intended to isolate China, saying "many countries recognize that this is not an economic grouping but it is truly a political grouping." [31]

India

Initially, India did not outline a definitive position towards the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. [32] Prabir De of the Research and Information System for Developing Countries, a think tank associated with the Ministry of External Affairs, wrote that India may be uncomfortable with the high economic standards envisaged by the US. He also noted that the IPEF position on digital governance contained issues that directly conflict with India's stated positions. [32]

In September 2022, Minister of Commerce & Industry Piyush Goyal said at a press conference in the United States that India had agreed to three pillars relating to supply chains: tax, anti-corruption and clean energy, but that the fourth pillar on trade, involving labour, environment, digital data and public procurement, had not been agreed yet. [32] The US expressed concerns about potential Indian demands for data localisation to ensure that data about Indian users is held and processed only in India and not in the US. [32]

A particular aspect of the framework caters also to Indian protectionists. The framework does not allow access to the U.S. market and does not mandate tariff liberalization. Instead, it emphasizes supply chain resilience and provides room to negotiate regulations related to India's highly controversial policies such as data localization. [33]

United States

In March 2022, a bipartisan coalition of over 200 members of the United States Congress wrote a letter to Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo and Trade Representative Katherine Tai urging the inclusion of Taiwan in the IPEF. [34] Following the IPEF's formation, groups including Public Citizen urged trade officials to be transparent during negotiations, including through the publication of draft text proposals. [35]

In a 2022 hearing, two Democratic members of the U.S. Senate expressed concerns that the IPEF was insufficiently ambitious in scope. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), who chairs the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, stated that he did not believe the framework was “as robust as I think we need" and questioned the absence of Taiwan in the framework. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) expressed concern that IPEF does not include a mechanism to allow U.S. agriculture producers the opportunity to export to new markets. [36]

Comparison with the RCEP

The combined population and gross domestic product of IPEF member states exceeds that of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a 2020 regional trade deal that includes China. [37] The only RCEP members not also included in the IPEF are China, Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos; while non-RCEP members are the United States, India, and Fiji.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation</span> Economic forum of Asia–Pacific nations

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation is an inter-governmental forum for 21 member economies in the Pacific Rim that promotes free trade throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Following the success of ASEAN's series of post-ministerial conferences launched in the mid-1980s, APEC started in 1989, in response to the growing interdependence of Asia-Pacific economies and the advent of regional trade blocs in other parts of the world; it aimed to establish new markets for agricultural products and raw materials beyond Europe. Headquartered in Singapore, APEC is recognized as one of the highest-level multilateral blocs and oldest forums in the Asia-Pacific region, and exerts significant global influence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Pacific</span> Biogeographic marine region of Earth

The Indo-Pacific is a vast biogeographic region of Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Asia</span>

The economy of Asia comprises about 4.7 billion people living in 50 different nations. Asia is the fastest growing economic region, as well as the largest continental economy by both GDP Nominal and PPP in the world. Moreover, Asia is the site of some of the world's longest modern economic booms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trans-Pacific Partnership</span> 2016 proposed trade agreement

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), or Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), was a proposed trade agreement between 12 Pacific Rim economies: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam, and the United States. In the United States, the proposal was signed on 4 February 2016 but not ratified as a result of significant domestic political opposition. After taking office, the newly elected President Donald Trump formally withdrew the United States from TPP in January 2017, therefore ensuring the TPP could not be ratified as required and did not enter into force. The remaining countries negotiated a new trade agreement called Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, which incorporated most of the provisions of the TPP and which entered into force on 30 December 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China</span>

The United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China originated during the Cold War. At that time, the U.S. had a containment policy against communist states. The leaked Pentagon Papers indicated the efforts by the U.S. to contain China through military actions undertaken in the Vietnam War. The containment policy centered around an island chain strategy. President Richard Nixon's China rapprochement signaled a shift in focus to gain leverage in containing the Soviet Union. Formal diplomatic ties between the U.S. and China were established in 1979, and with normalized trade relations since 2000, the U.S. and China have been linked by closer economic ties and more cordial relations. In his first term as U.S. president, Barack Obama said, "We want China to succeed and prosper. It's good for the United States if China continues on the path of development that it's on".

The East Asia Economic Caucus (EAEC) or East Asia Economic Group (EAEG) was a regional free trade zone (FTA) proposed in 1997 by Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and encompasses most nations of East and Southeast Asia (ESEA). However, Japan at the time refused participation due to the exclusion of the United States, which at the time had tariffs on each other, has an economy too deeply interlinked through trade, and was still reeling from the effects of the Japanese asset price bubble. They also added that they were already members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and many other notable regional organizations in ESEA. South Korea was also extremely dissatisfied with the idea of placing Japan at the center of the proposed organization due to historical connotations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free trade agreements of New Zealand</span>

New Zealand is party to 14 free trade agreements (FTAs) worldwide. Together they accounted for over 70% of New Zealand's trade in 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Act East policy</span> Indias foreign policy dealing with South-East Asian nations

The Act East policy is an effort by the Government of India to cultivate extensive economic and strategic relations with the nations of Southeast Asia to bolster its standing as a regional power and a counterweight to the strategic influence of the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">APEC United States 2011</span>

APEC United States 2011 was a series of political meetings around the United States between the 21 member economies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation during 2011. It culminated in the 19th APEC Economic Leaders' Meeting held at the Hawaii Convention Center in Honolulu, Hawaii from November 12–13, 2011. The United States last hosted an APEC summit at the 1993 summit in Seattle. President Barack Obama, a Honolulu native, and First Lady Michelle Obama hosted the other leaders and spouses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Berkeley APEC Study Center</span> Research center at the University of California

The Berkeley APEC Study Center (BASC) is a research center at the University of California, Berkeley. Created in 1996 in response to an initiative by U.S. President Bill Clinton, the center undertakes research, disseminates information and facilitates discussion on issue related to APEC involving political, economic and business trends in the Asia-Pacific region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quadrilateral Security Dialogue</span> Strategic dialogue between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States

The Quad is a grouping of Australia, India, Japan, and the United States that is maintained by talks between member countries. The grouping was initiated in 2007 by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with the support of Australian Prime Minister John Howard, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. The dialogue was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Exercise Malabar. The diplomatic and military arrangement was widely viewed as a response to increased Chinese economic and military power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</span> 2020 Asia-Pacific free trade agreement

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership is a free trade agreement among the Asia-Pacific countries of Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The 15 member countries account for about 30% of the world's population and 30% of global GDP, making it the largest trade bloc in history. Signed in November 2020, RCEP is the first free trade agreement among the largest economies in Asia, including China, Indonesia, Japan, and South Korea.

The negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement were held between 12 countries between 2008 and 2015. The negotiations were aimed at obtaining an agreement between the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement parties Brunei, Chile, Singapore and New Zealand, as well as the Australia and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership</span> Multilateral free trade agreement

The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), initially abbreviated as TPP11 or TPP-11, is a trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. It evolved from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was never ratified due to the withdrawal of the United States. The eleven members have combined economies representing 13.4 percent of global gross domestic product, at approximately US$13.5 trillion, making the CPTPP one of the world's largest free trade areas by GDP, along with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, the European single market, and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. The United Kingdom and the present members formally signed an accession protocol on 16 July 2023, and will join the agreement when it has been ratified by all parties, or after 15 months if the UK and a majority of CPTPP parties have ratified it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free and Open Indo-Pacific</span> Indo-Pacific strategies of countries with similar interests in the region

Free and Open Indo-Pacific is an umbrella term that encompasses Indo-Pacific-specific strategies of countries with similar interests in the region. The concept, with its origins in Weimar German geopolitics, has been revived since 2006 through Japanese initiatives and American cooperation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment</span> International funding project by G7 nations

The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) is a collaborative effort by Group of Seven (G7) to fund infrastructure projects in developing nations based on the trust principles of the Blue Dot Network. It is intended to be the bloc's counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative and a key component of the "Biden Doctrine".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free trade agreements of Australia</span>

Australia is party to 18 free trade agreements (FTAs) worldwide covering 30 economies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bangladesh and the Indo-Pacific Strategy</span>

The Indo-Pacific strategy is the U.S. Government's vision for a free, open, and secure Indo-Pacific region in which countries of the Indo-Pacific are empowered to tackle 21st-century challenges and seize emerging opportunities. Bangladesh, strategically located in the Bay of Bengal, serves as a gateway to South and Southeast Asia. Its position makes it a key participant in the Indo-Pacific strategy of the United States, India, Japan, and Australia. Bangladesh views stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific as essential for becoming a modern, developed nation. The country aims for a free, open, and inclusive Indo-Pacific to ensure long-term resilience and shared prosperity for all.

References

  1. ↑ Liptak, Kevin (2022-05-23). "Biden unveils his economic plan for countering China in Asia". CNN . Archived from the original on 2022-05-31. Retrieved 2022-05-24.
  2. ↑ "FACT SHEET: In Asia, President Biden and a Dozen Indo-Pacific Partners Launch the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity". whitehouse.gov . 2022-05-23. Archived from the original on 2022-05-31. Retrieved 2022-05-24.
  3. ↑ Nakamura, David (2015-04-26). "Obama shifts his pitch for the Trans-Pacific Partnership". The Washington Post . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  4. ↑ Rampton, Roberta (2016-05-02). "Obama says Chinese-led trade deal shows need for TPP: Washington Post". Reuters . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  5. ↑ "Trump executive order pulls out of TPP trade deal". BBC News. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017. Mr Trump's executive order on TPP is seen as mainly symbolic since the deal was never ratified by a divided US Congress.
  6. ↑ Ming, Cheang (9 March 2018). "Global trade just had a 'one step forward, one step back' day". CNBC . Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  7. 1 2 Sevastopulo, Demetri; Inagaki, Kana (20 May 2022), "Joe Biden waters down Indo-Pacific Economic Framework to win more support" , Financial Times , archived from the original on 2022-05-24, retrieved 2022-05-24
  8. ↑ Liptak, Kevin (2022-05-23). "Biden unveils his economic plan for countering China in Asia". CNN . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  9. ↑ Swanson, Ana (2022-09-09). "Biden Administration Outlines Scope of Asian Economic Pact". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  10. ↑ In Tokyo, Biden set to launch new Indo-Pacific trade pact to replace TPP, Marketwatch, archived from the original on 2022-05-24, retrieved 2022-05-24
  11. 1 2 3 Ma, Xinru; Kang, David C. (2024). Beyond Power Transitions: The Lessons of East Asian History and the Future of U.S.-China Relations. Columbia Studies in International Order and Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN   978-0-231-55597-5.
  12. ↑ Baker, Peter; Kanno-Youngs, Zolan (2022-05-23). "Biden to Begin New Asia-Pacific Economic Bloc With a Dozen Allies". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  13. ↑ Swanson, Ana (2023-05-27). "Biden Administration Announces Indo-Pacific Deal, Clashing With Industry Groups". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-06-15.
  14. ↑ Bhadrakumar, M. K. (2022-05-25). "IPEF will be a hard sell in the Indo-Pacific". Asia Times . Retrieved 2023-06-15.
  15. ↑ "What is the point of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework?" . The Economist . ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 2023-06-15.
  16. ↑ "Leaders' Statement on Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity". The White House. 2023-11-16. Retrieved 2023-11-16.
  17. ↑ "Pillar II – Supply Chains". U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved 2024-06-09.
  18. 1 2 Rogers, Alex; Sevastopulo, Demetri (2023-11-15). "Joe Biden halts plan for Indo-Pacific trade deal after opposition from Democrats". Financial Times. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
  19. ↑ Tan, Su-Lin (2022-05-25). "The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework: What it is — and why it matters". CNBC. Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  20. ↑ Bowie, Nile (2022-05-30). "Why ASEAN is giving Biden's IPEF a chance". Asia Times . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  21. ↑ "White House welcomes Fiji to its Indo-Pacific economic plan". Reuters . 2022-05-27. Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  22. ↑ Sinha, Saurabh (2022-09-10). "India stays out of Indo-Pacific trade pillar". The Times of India . Retrieved 2022-10-06.
  23. ↑ Ibbitson, John (2022-05-26). "Canada inexcusably absent from another Indo-Pacific initiative". The Globe and Mail . Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  24. ↑ Oshikiri, Tomoyoshi (2022-12-06). "Canada's IPEF bid has support from all members: trade minister". Nikkei Asia . Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  25. ↑ Lawder, David; Martina, Michael (2022-06-01). "U.S., Taiwan to launch trade talks after island excluded from Indo-Pacific group". Reuters . Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  26. ↑ "Tilting horizons: the Integrated Review and the Indo-Pacific". UK Government. 30 August 2023.
  27. ↑ "Parliament panel: Government should assess whether IPEF is right for the UK". InsideTrade. 31 August 2023.
  28. ↑ China says Washington's 'divisive' Indo-Pacific strategy doomed to fail, South China Morning Post, 23 May 2022, archived from the original on 2022-05-24, retrieved 2022-05-24
  29. ↑ US snubs Taiwan from Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, Taiwan News, 23 May 2022, archived from the original on 2022-05-24, retrieved 2022-05-24{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. ↑ Tong, Kurt (11 May 2022). "Congress should get creative on Taiwan". The Hill. Archived from the original on 25 May 2022. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  31. ↑ Yamaguchi, Mari (27 May 2022). "Ex-Malaysia PM: US-led trade group intended to isolate China". Associated Press . Archived from the original on 28 May 2022. Retrieved 28 May 2022.
  32. 1 2 3 4 "India accepts three out of four pillars of US-led IPEF, so why has it stopped short of a total agreement?". Indian Express. 2022-09-10. Retrieved 2023-05-03.
  33. ↑ Ramesh, Akhil (2022-06-17). "Why US' Indo-Pacific economic initiative is really all about India". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 2023-04-24.
  34. ↑ Martina, Michael; Lawder, David (2022-03-31). "U.S. trade chief Tai declines to say if Taiwan will be part of Indo-Pacific pact". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  35. ↑ Overly, Steven (2022-10-03). "IPEF confidentiality rules revealed". POLITICO. Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  36. ↑ Martin, Eric (2022-03-31). "Biden Trade Plans Criticized by Senators as Lacking Ambition". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2023-05-02.
  37. ↑ U.S.-led IPEF outweighs China-involving RCEP in population, GDP, Yonhap News Agency, 23 May 2022, archived from the original on 2022-05-24, retrieved 2022-05-24
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.