Insect ecology

Last updated
A giant water bug attacking a fish

Insect ecology is the interaction of insects, individually or as a community, with the surrounding environment or ecosystem. [1] This interaction is mostly mediated by the secretion and detection of chemicals (semiochemical) in the environment by insects. [2] Semiochemicals are secreted by the organisms (including insects) in the environment and they are detected by other organism such as insects. Semiochemicals used by organisms, including (insects) to interact with other organism either of the same species or different species can generally grouped into four. These are pheromone, synomones, allomone and kairomone. [3] Pheromones are semiochemicals that facilitates interaction between organisms of same species. Synomones benefit both the producer and receiver, allomone is advantageous to only the producer whiles kairomones is beneficial to the receiver. [3] [4] Insect interact with other species within their community and these interaction include mutualism, commensalism, ammensalism, parasitism and neutralisms. [5] [6] [7]

Contents

Insects play significant roles in the ecology of the world due to their vast diversity of form, function, and lifestyle. They are the major contributor to biodiversity in most habitats, except in the sea, they play a variety of important ecological roles in the many functions of an ecosystem. In the case of nutrient recycling, insects contribute to this vital function by degrading or consuming leaf litter, wood, carrion and dung, and by dispersal of fungi. Insects form an important part of the food chain, especially for entomophagous vertebrates such as many mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles. Insects play a critical role in maintaining community structure and composition; in the case of animals through diseases transmission, predation and parasitism, and in plants through phytophagy and plant propagation through pollination and seed dispersal. [8] From an anthropocentric point of view, insects compete with humans; they consume as much as 10% of the food produced by man and infect one in six humans with a pathogen. [9]

Community ecology

Community ecology is the process by which a group of organisms which live in the same location interact. There are indirect interactions, such as reproduction, foraging patterns, and decaying. There are also direct interactions, which take the form of symbiosis, competition, and predation, which are the most easily notable . [10] Every organism at its most basic state could be a consumer in some situations, and a producer in others. The culmination of all these interactions is what defines a community and what differentiates one from another. Insects often play numerous roles in these communities, although these roles vary widely based on what species is present. Insects recognize their host (source of food) by means of their visual, olfactory, gustatory, and tactile cues. [11]

Decomposers

Dung beetles (Scarabaeus laticollis) and dung ball Scarabaeus laticollis 2.jpg
Dung beetles ( Scarabaeus laticollis ) and dung ball

Decomposer insects are those that feed on dead or rotten bodies of plants or animals. These insects are called saprophages [12] and fall into three main categories: those that feed on dead or dying plant matter, those that feed on dead animals (carrion), and those that feed on excrement (feces) of other animals. As dead plants are eaten away, more surface area is exposed, allowing the plants to decay faster due to an increase in microorganisms that eat the plant. [13] These insects are largely responsible for helping to create a layer of humus on the soil that provides an ideal environment for various fungi fungi and microorganisms . These organisms produce much of the nitrogen, carbon, and minerals that plants require for their growth. Carrion feeders include several beetles, ants, mites, wasps, fly larvae (maggots), and others. These insects occupy the dead body for a short time but rapidly consume and/or bury the carcass. Typically, some species of fly are the first to feed on the dead body, but the order of insects that follow is predictable and is known as the faunal succession. Many dung beetles and dung flies are attracted to the smell of animal feces. The adults often lay egg on fresh excrement and the larvae will feed on the organic matter. Many species of dung-feeders have evolved and only feed on feces from a specific species. There is even a species of dung-beetle that will roll feces into a ball, push it into a pre-dug hole, lays egg in the dung, and then covers it with fresh dirt to provide a perfect nursery for its larvae.

Carnivores

Carnivorous insects survive by eating other living animals, be it through hunting, blood sucking, or as an internal parasite. These insects fall into three basic categories: predators, parasites, and parasitoids.

An elongate twig ant (Pseudomyrmex gracilis) attacking a young mantis Predator vs Predator (33971673831).jpg
An elongate twig ant (Pseudomyrmex gracilis) attacking a young mantis

Predatory insects are typically larger as their survival is dependent upon their ability to hunt, kill or immobilize, and eat their prey. [14] However, there are several exceptions, with ants being the most notable. Ants, and other colony insects, can use their sheer numbers to overwhelm their prey even if the ants are significantly smaller. They often have specialized mandibles (mouthparts) for this task, some causing excruciating pain, paralysis, or simply having a high bite force. Conversely, insects that live on their own must be able to reliably bring down their prey and as such have developed a myriad of unique hunting methods. Some actively travel, in search of prey, while others wait in ambush. Others may release chemicals to attract certain creatures, and others will eat anything they can. [15]

A fly carrying a parasite Tiny fly carrying parasite. - Flickr - gailhampshire.jpg
A fly carrying a parasite

Parasitic insects live on or within their hosts. The parasite causes the host some harm, but not enough to kill it. The presence of the parasite is often not noticed by the host, as the size discrepancy is typically so vast. Parasites vary widely in how they survive in or around their hosts; some complete their full life cycle within the body, such as the females of most Strepsiptera species, while others may only stay in for the duration of their larval stage. Kleptopasrasites obtain food by stealing it from their hosts. A kleptoparasite may opportunistically feed on prey that has been recently killed by a predator, such as many adult freeloader flies, or it may deceptively live in the host's nest, such as the majority of the ant crickets. There is as great of variation in methodology and species in parasites as in any other type of insect[ citation needed ]. The most threatening parasites to humans are ones that live outside the host and consume the host's blood. These species transmit viruses, disease, and even other, smaller parasites to the host, spreading these throughout the populations of many third world countries with poor health care.

Female golden hunting wasp dragging paralysed spider into its nest Wasp and spider 02.jpg
Female golden hunting wasp dragging paralysed spider into its nest

A subcategory of parasites known as parasitoids. A parasitoid is an organism which develop on or in another organism (host), derives its nourishment from the host and eventually kills the host. [16] In insects, a parasitoid is an insects whose larvae grows by feeding in or on another arthropod (host) and eventually killing the host. [17] [18] The majority of parasitoids insects consume their victims as larvae, while the adults often feed on nectar or other organic material. One family of wasps, the spider wasps, will paralyze spiders before bringing them back to their nest and laying an egg on the spider's abdomen. Other parasitoid wasps, such as ichneumon and braconid wasps, lay their eggs on or directly inside of their hosts. Many of the adult female wasps have long ovipositors, which may be longer than the entire body length of the adult. Parasitoid beetles in the family Ripiphoridae attack various types of insects, as do most members of the large family of tachinid flies.

Herbivores

A phytotophagous/herbivorous insect Phytophagous beetle (lat.oxythyrea funesta).jpg
A phytotophagous/herbivorous insect

Out of all described eukaryotes almost one third are herbivorous insects, about 500,000. [19] They feed on living plant matter or the products of a plant. They are also called phytophagous insects. These insects may eat essential parts of the plant, such as the leaves or sap, or they may survive on the pollen and nectar produced by the plant. These insects will compete with other organisms for limited plant host in an environment where there is constant change in plant availability and quality. [20] Herbivorous insects often use olfactory or visual cues to determine a potential host plant. A visual cue could simply be the outline of a certain type of leaf, or the high contrast between the petals of a flower and the leaves surrounding it. These are typically associated with the olfactory signal an insect may receive from their intended meal. The olfactory cue could be the scent of the nectar produced by a flower, a certain chemical excreted to repel unwanted predators, or the exposed sap of a cherry tree. Either of these two senses could be the driving force behind an insect choosing to consume a certain plant, but it is only after it takes the first bite, and the confirmation of this food is made by its sense of taste, that it truly feeds. Since most  insects depend on plant as their source of food, plants have developed some defensive mechanisms to protect themselves form insects. These mechanisms are largely grouped in two; antibiosis and antixenosis resistance. With antibiosis, the defensive trait of the plants affects the growth, survival and development of the insect but with the antixenosis defense, chemical and morphological factors affect the feeding behavior of plant. [21] [22] Plants have evolved to produce several secondary metabolic substance to protect themselves from herbivores insects. These chemicals are groped into alkaloids, terpenoids and phenolics. Insects also have developed mechanism to detoxify these chemicals produced by their host plants. [11] After a herbivorous insect is finished feeding on a plant, it will either wait there until hungry again, or move on to another task, be it finding more food, a mate, or shelter. Herbivorous insects bring significantly more danger to a plant than that of consumption; they are among the most prominent disease-carrying creatures in the insect world. There are numerous diseases, fungi, and parasites that can be carried by nearly any herbivorous insect, many of which fatal to the plant infected. Some diseases even produce a sweet smelling, sticky secretion from the infected plant to attract more insects and spread farther.[ citation needed ] In return plants have their own defenses. Some of these defenses are toxic secondary metabolites to deter insects. These toxins limit the diet breadth of herbivores, and evolving mechanisms to nonetheless continue herbivory is an important part of maintaining diet breadth in insects, and so in their evolutionary history as a whole. Both pleiotropy and epistasis have complex effects in this regard, with the simulations of Griswold 2006 showing that more genes provide the benefit of more targets for adaptive mutations, while Fisher 1930 showed that a mutation can improve one trait while epistasis causes it to also trigger negative effects - slowing down adaptation. [19]

Schoonhoven and associates, from Blaney et al 1985 to Schoonhoven et al 1992, illuminate the interplay between chemoreceptor stimuli in Lepidoptera and Orthoptera. They used Helicoverpa armigera , Spodoptera littoralis , S. frugiperda , Chloridea virescens , and grasshoppers. They find that most insects respond immediately and roughly equally to phagostimulant indicating good food and phagodeterrent indicating a food to be avoided, or a material which is not food substances. They also present some divergent examples, both delayed response suggesting that food decisions were mediated by cognition and not just simple chemoreception and unequal chemoreceptor stimulation with gustatory cells firing equally when presented with any material, but deterrent cells firing to a greater degree for undesirable materials. (They also investigate similar questions of seeking/avoidance in common questions of dietary balance of protein and carbohydrate i.e. less risky dietary choices where toxins are not the deciding factor and find similar results, with some insects eating solely by chemoreception and some showing delayed decisions, suggesting cognition.) Both salicin and caffeine are antifeedants, and some of the Schoonhoven group's investigations test both the deterrence they produce and habituation to them. The Glendinning group has done some similar work. They find Manduca sexta 's habituation to salicin to be cognitively mediated because deterrent sensory cell stimulation barely decreases even when avoidance ceases. On the other hand Glendinning et al 1999 finds M. sexta habituation to caffeine to be due to change in chemoreceptor activation because it decreases significantly, and at the same time as cessation of feeding avoidance. The same work tests the cross-effects of habituation between the two chemicals, finding that they probably share a second messenger. For both phagostimulus and deterrence stimuli they find that the effects of multiple stimulations by multiple substances upon the same cells, simultaneously produce additive effects, up to the cell's firing rate ceiling. [23]

Climate change is expected to change herbivory relationships. Liu et. al 2011 finds no change in distribution in one example, but instead the same herbivore switched primary hosts due to altered flowering time. Gillespie et al 2012 found host mismatch due to temperature shift. (These methodologies in herbivory could be applied to study the same question in climate change + pollination. As of 2014 however this remains to be tried.) [24]

Interspecific relationships

Due to their diverse functions, diets, and lifestyles, insects are integral components of terrestrial ecological communities. Beyond functioning as decomposers, carnivores, and herbivores, insects often participate in other species interactions such as symbiosis. These interactions can both positively and adversely affect plants, mammals, and other insects. These relationships are mostly symbiotic relations. [25] An insect host, or macrosymbiont, may engage in interactions that either provide mutual benefits (mutualism) or have no impact (commensalism) on its associated microsymbionts, such as protozoa, algae, fungi, bacteria, or viruses. [26]

Symbiosis

Symbiosis [27] is a broad term that encompasses various types of long-term interactions between different species. Symbiotic relationship exist between insects and other organisms. It has been demonstrated that the symbiotic relationship between insect and microorganisms is a common phenomena. [28] Some symbionts are parasitic with negative effects on the hosts, some are commensalistic with no apparent effects on the hosts, and others are mutualistic with beneficial effects on the hosts. [29] Recent behavioral studies on symbiont-infected and uninfected insects have shown that not only parasitic or pathogenic microbes but also commensalistic and mutualistic microbes can influence the host’s behavior in ways that seem adaptive and these symbiotic interactions can often shift from one form to another due to external factors or internal changes driven by the symbionts themselves. [28] [30] A typical characteristic of insect-microorganism symbioses is the reliance on nutritionally imbalanced substrates. [31] Some microsymbionts may also aid their insect hosts in overcoming the defenses of their plant or animal hosts. [31] Resident microorganisms can protect their insect hosts from natural enemies through various mechanisms. In addition to enhancing the host's immune responses against such threats, symbionts can outcompete pathogens and parasites for microsites within the host and produce harmful secondary compounds that work alongside the insect's immune defenses. [32] For example, Pseudomonas sp. in Paederus rove beetles synthesizes the polyketide “pederin”, which protects the beetles from predation. [33] A specific example of such interactions is bacteriocyte-associated symbionts, which are passed directly from mothers to their offspring during the early stages of egg or embryo development. This transmission, integrated into the insect's developmental process, ensures the continuation of the symbiosis. [28] While mutualism and parasitism are specific types of symbiotic relationships, there are other forms as well. For instance, in some cases, insects may engage in symbiotic relationships where one species benefits while the other is unaffected, this is known as commensal symbiosis. In other cases, obligate symbiosis is a specific class of insect symbiosis that plays a crucial role in overcoming nutrient limitations. In this type of symbiotic relationship, many insects rely on microbial partners for nutrients supplementation. [34]

The insect-symbiont interactions generate morphological adaptations and mechanism that insects use to protect, nourish, and transport their microbial partners. Examples include fermentation chambers, bucal pockets, blind sacs, crypt guts, diverticula, crypt cells, bacteriocytes, mycetocytes, and mycetomes, as well as instances where bacterial endosymbionts are distributed throughout the lymph. [26] Additionally, numerous morphological adaptations support fungal ectosymbionts. Structures such as mycangia have been identified in locations like the prothorax, pronotum, coxa, mesonotum, mandibles, pharynx, and elytra. [35]

Pollination of a flowering plant by a bee. Pollination.gif
Pollination of a flowering plant by a bee.

Mutualism

Mutualism is a symbiotic relationship between two species in which each benefits. [28] In this type of relationships, each species involved provides some  services to the other species and this could be nutrition, defense etc. [36] Signaling is known to play a major role in selecting mutualistic partners. Odors and chemical detection is involved in the formation of symbiotic relation between most fungus-growing insect. The attraction of ambrosia beetle to its fungal symbionts indicate that some signaling by microbial volatile organic compound s(MVOCs) produced by the fungi leads to this partner choice. [5] In Ambrosia symbiosis, the ambrosia beetle obtains nutrition from the ambrosia fungi while the fungi relies on its host ( ambrosia beetle) for its dispersal and cultivar maintenance. [37] [38] Another common mutualistic relationships include cleaning symbiosis, animal induced pollination, or protection from predators. One example of insect mutualism is the pollination of flowering plants by insects, a field of study known as anthecology. Primarily, various bee species work as pollinators of flowering plants, feeding on their nectar and in turn picking up their pollen and spreading it to other flowers. [28] Another example of insect mutualism is the relationship between ants and aphids. The aphids provide food (honeydrew) for the ants and the ants in return protect the aphid from its predators by feeding on the predators. [39] Another notable example is the relationship between aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and their symbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola . These microbes are situated within specialized internal structures known as bacteriomes, within the insect’s body. [40] Since aphids’ diet of plant sap lacks certain essential amino acids and vitamins, Buchnera supplies these nutrients to them. In exchange, aphids provide Buchnera with a protected environment within specialized cells, as Buchnera's genome is highly reduced, rendering it incapable of surviving independently. [41] [42]

Mites benefiting from the movement of Nicrophorus humator. Nicrophorus humator - sexton beetle - Flickr - Nick Goodrum Photography.jpg
Mites benefiting from the movement of Nicrophorus humator .

Commensalism

Commensalism is a different type of ecological interaction between species in which one species gains benefits while the other is neither harmed nor benefited. [7] Two examples of commensalism that can be seen in insect ecology are phoresy, an interaction in which one attaches itself to another for transportation, and inquilinism, the use of another organism for shelter. Ticks and mites have adapted to latch onto beetles, flies, and bees (as well as other organisms) for transportation, an example of phoresy. [43] In terms of inquilinism, insects commonly establish themselves in human garages or shelters of other animals for protection against predators and weather.

Parasitoid insects

Parasitoids are insects that live intimately with a host, feed off of the host like a parasite, but eventually kill the host. This specific type of species interaction is exclusive to insects and is employed most commonly by wasps. An example of this is when parasitoid wasps inject their eggs into aphids. The eggs will eventually hatch and produce wasp larvae that feed on and consume the organism. Additionally, some parasitoids chemically affect the host to propagate the development of parasitic offspring. Parasitoid wasps typically prey on a specific insect or spider species, and the host life-stage at which the wasp deposits its seed differs. In regard to humans, parasitoid insects are favored because they can be used as biological pest controls for farmers, preying on other insects that damage crops. [44]

Competition

Insects often compete with each other for resources such as food, territory, and mates. Competition can occur within species (intraspecific) or between species (interspecific). This competition can lead to adaptations and niche differentiation, where species evolve to occupy different ecological niches to minimize competition.

Neutralism

In some cases, insects may interact with each other without affecting one another positively or negatively. They simply coexist without any significant impact on each other's fitness or survival. [45] In such a relationship, the interaction that happens between the organisms involved are always indirect or incidental. [6] This type of relationship is often observed when insects occupy different habitats or have minimal interactions. [45] Another example is when a bird uses a tree as a lookout without having feeding on the plant or insect on the plant. [46] An example of such relationship is the one that exist between a tarantulas and a cacti that live in a barren region. [6]

Facilitation

Facilitation occurs when one species indirectly benefits another species by modifying the environment. For example, certain insects may create microhabitats or modify resources that become beneficial for other insect species. An example of this could be a species of insect that creates shelter or nesting sites that are subsequently utilized by other insect species. [47]

Amensalism

Amensalism is a non-symbiotic species interaction in which one organism negatively affects the other organism but is unaffected by that organism. This type of species interaction is common in nature, and an example in insect ecology is between goats and insects. The two individuals compete for the same food source, but goats will deprive the latter from feeding. [48] The goat is completely unaffected by the interaction, but the insect is left hungry.

Mimicry

Insects may evolve to mimic the appearance, behavior, or other characteristics of other species. This can be beneficial for the mimicking species in various ways, such as gaining protection from predators or gaining access to resources. For example, some harmless insects mimic the appearance of more dangerous or unpalatable species to avoid predation. [49]

Allelopathy

Allelopathy involves the release of chemicals by one species that affects the growth, development, or behavior of another species. While this type of interaction is more commonly associated with plants, certain insects may also engage in allelopathic relationships with each other. These chemicals can influence competition, reproduction, or survival of other insect species in the vicinity. [50]

Coevolution

Coevolution is the ecological process by which two species exclusively affect each other’s evolution. This concept is essential to the study of insect ecology. Coevolution is particularly important in how it can lead to both micro- and macro-evolutionary changes. Micro-evolutionary changes include shifts in genome and alleles while macro-evolution is the emergence of a new species, also called speciation. [51] Two species that coevolve experience reciprocal evolution and go through biological changes as a result of the other species. [52] One example of this in insect ecology is the coevolution of Dasyscolia ciliata , a species of wasp, and Ophrys speculum , a species of orchid. These two species have both evolved in such a way that the wasp is the only known pollinator of the plant. This relationship can be seen in other species of flowering plants and pollinating insects, but a more distinct example is the coevolution of ants and acacias. The acacia ant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea) is an insect that has been discovered to protect five different species of acacia trees. The ant provides protection to the plant while the acacias reciprocate by supplying food and shelter. Over generations, these two species have adapted to accommodate each other, an example of coevolution.

Role

Insects play numerous roles which have both negative and positive impact on the environment and other organisms. These roles include pollination, seed dispersal, improving soil fertility, act as a source of food for other organisms and involve in disease transmission. Pollination and seed dispersal is known to be mostly caused by animals; and insects are responsible for about 85% of pollination in angiosperms. [53] Ants are known to cause dispersion of the seeds of more than 100 species of plants found in Brazilian Caatinga. [54] Soil dwelling insects such as ant, termites and beetles help in the decomposition of plant residue, aeration of soil and enhancement of soil structure. These activities help in improving soil health and fertility. [55] Insects again serve as a source of food for other organism such as reptiles, bird , amphibians, fishes and many others. [56] Insects are also involved in the transfer of vector borne disease which accounts for approximately 700,000 death annually. [57]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Endosymbiont</span> Organism that lives within the body or cells of another organism

An endosymbiont or endobiont is an organism that lives within the body or cells of another organism. Typically the two organisms are in a mutualistic relationship. Examples are nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which live in the root nodules of legumes, single-cell algae inside reef-building corals, and bacterial endosymbionts that provide essential nutrients to insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Symbiosis</span> Close, long-term biological interaction between distinct organisms (usually species)

Symbiosis is any type of a close and long-term biological interaction, between two organisms of different species. The two organisms, termed symbionts, can be either in a mutualistic, a commensalistic, or a parasitic relationship. In 1879, Heinrich Anton de Bary defined symbiosis as "the living together of unlike organisms".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasitism</span> Relationship between species where one organism lives on or in another organism, causing it harm

Parasitism is a close relationship between species, where one organism, the parasite, lives on or inside another organism, the host, causing it some harm, and is adapted structurally to this way of life. The entomologist E. O. Wilson characterised parasites as "predators that eat prey in units of less than one". Parasites include single-celled protozoans such as the agents of malaria, sleeping sickness, and amoebic dysentery; animals such as hookworms, lice, mosquitoes, and vampire bats; fungi such as honey fungus and the agents of ringworm; and plants such as mistletoe, dodder, and the broomrapes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mutualism (biology)</span> Mutually beneficial interaction between species

Mutualism describes the ecological interaction between two or more species where each species has a net benefit. Mutualism is a common type of ecological interaction. Prominent examples are:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Companion planting</span> Agricultural technique

Companion planting in gardening and agriculture is the planting of different crops in proximity for any of a number of different reasons, including weed suppression, pest control, pollination, providing habitat for beneficial insects, maximizing use of space, and to otherwise increase crop productivity. Companion planting is a form of polyculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aphid</span> Superfamily of insects

Aphids are small sap-sucking insects and members of the superfamily Aphidoidea. Common names include greenfly and blackfly, although individuals within a species can vary widely in color. The group includes the fluffy white woolly aphids. A typical life cycle involves flightless females giving live birth to female nymphs—who may also be already pregnant, an adaptation scientists call telescoping generations—without the involvement of males. Maturing rapidly, females breed profusely so that the number of these insects multiplies quickly. Winged females may develop later in the season, allowing the insects to colonize new plants. In temperate regions, a phase of sexual reproduction occurs in the autumn, with the insects often overwintering as eggs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Host (biology)</span> Organism that harbours another organism

In biology and medicine, a host is a larger organism that harbours a smaller organism; whether a parasitic, a mutualistic, or a commensalist guest (symbiont). The guest is typically provided with nourishment and shelter. Examples include animals playing host to parasitic worms, cells harbouring pathogenic (disease-causing) viruses, or a bean plant hosting mutualistic (helpful) nitrogen-fixing bacteria. More specifically in botany, a host plant supplies food resources to micropredators, which have an evolutionarily stable relationship with their hosts similar to ectoparasitism. The host range is the collection of hosts that an organism can use as a partner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasitoid</span> Organism that lives with its host and kills it

In evolutionary ecology, a parasitoid is an organism that lives in close association with its host at the host's expense, eventually resulting in the death of the host. Parasitoidism is one of six major evolutionary strategies within parasitism, distinguished by the fatal prognosis for the host, which makes the strategy close to predation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biological interaction</span> Effect that organisms have on other organisms

In ecology, a biological interaction is the effect that a pair of organisms living together in a community have on each other. They can be either of the same species, or of different species. These effects may be short-term, or long-term, both often strongly influence the adaptation and evolution of the species involved. Biological interactions range from mutualism, beneficial to both partners, to competition, harmful to both partners. Interactions can be direct when physical contact is established or indirect, through intermediaries such as shared resources, territories, ecological services, metabolic waste, toxins or growth inhibitors. This type of relationship can be shown by net effect based on individual effects on both organisms arising out of relationship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protocooperation</span>

Protocooperation is where two species interact with each other beneficially; they have no need to interact with each other - they interact purely for the gain that they receive from doing this. It is not at all necessary for protocooperation to occur; growth and survival is possible in the absence of the interaction. The interaction that occurs can be between different kingdoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myrmecophyte</span> Plants that live in association with ants

Myrmecophytes are plants that live in a mutualistic association with a colony of ants. There are over 100 different genera of myrmecophytes. These plants possess structural adaptations in the form of domatia where ants can shelter, and food bodies and extrafloral nectaries that provide ants with food. In exchange for these resources, ants aid the myrmecophyte in pollination, seed dispersal, gathering of essential nutrients, and defense. Domatia adapted specifically to ants may be called myrmecodomatia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parasitoid wasp</span> Group of wasps

Parasitoid wasps are a large group of hymenopteran superfamilies, with all but the wood wasps (Orussoidea) being in the wasp-waisted Apocrita. As parasitoids, they lay their eggs on or in the bodies of other arthropods, sooner or later causing the death of these hosts. Different species specialise in hosts from different insect orders, most often Lepidoptera, though some select beetles, flies, or bugs; the spider wasps (Pompilidae) exclusively attack spiders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myrmecophily</span> Positive interspecies associations between ants and other organisms

Myrmecophily consists of positive, mutualistic, interspecies associations between ants and a variety of other organisms, such as plants, other arthropods, and fungi. It may also include commensal or even parasitic interactions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wasp</span> Group of insects

A wasp is any insect of the narrow-waisted suborder Apocrita of the order Hymenoptera which is neither a bee nor an ant; this excludes the broad-waisted sawflies (Symphyta), which look somewhat like wasps, but are in a separate suborder. The wasps do not constitute a clade, a complete natural group with a single ancestor, as bees and ants are deeply nested within the wasps, having evolved from wasp ancestors. Wasps that are members of the clade Aculeata can sting their prey.

<i>Acyrthosiphon pisum</i> Species of true bug

Acyrthosiphon pisum, commonly known as the pea aphid, is a sap-sucking insect in the family Aphididae. It feeds on several species of legumes worldwide, including forage crops, such as pea, clover, alfalfa, and broad bean, and ranks among the aphid species of major agronomical importance. The pea aphid is a model organism for biological study whose genome has been sequenced and annotated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical defense</span>

Chemical defense is a strategy employed by many organisms to avoid consumption by producing toxic or repellent metabolites or chemical warnings which incite defensive behavioral changes. The production of defensive chemicals occurs in plants, fungi, and bacteria, as well as invertebrate and vertebrate animals. The class of chemicals produced by organisms that are considered defensive may be considered in a strict sense to only apply to those aiding an organism in escaping herbivory or predation. However, the distinction between types of chemical interaction is subjective and defensive chemicals may also be considered to protect against reduced fitness by pests, parasites, and competitors. Repellent rather than toxic metabolites are allomones, a sub category signaling metabolites known as semiochemicals. Many chemicals used for defensive purposes are secondary metabolites derived from primary metabolites which serve a physiological purpose in the organism. Secondary metabolites produced by plants are consumed and sequestered by a variety of arthropods and, in turn, toxins found in some amphibians, snakes, and even birds can be traced back to arthropod prey. There are a variety of special cases for considering mammalian antipredatory adaptations as chemical defenses as well.

Arsenophonus nasoniae is a species of bacterium which was previously isolated from Nasonia vitripennis, a species of parasitoid wasp. These wasps are generalists which afflict the larvae of parasitic carrion flies such as blowflies, houseflies and flesh flies. A. nasoniae belongs to the phylum Pseudomonadota and family Morganellaceae. The genus Arsenophonus, has a close relationship to the Proteus (bacterium) rather than to that of Salmonella and Escherichia. The genus is composed of gammaproteobacterial, secondary-endosymbionts which are gram-negative. Cells are non-flagellated, non-motile, non-spore forming and form long to highly filamentous rods. Cellular division is exhibited through septation. The name 'Arsenophonus nasoniae gen. nov., sp. nov.' was therefore proposed for the discovered bacterium due to its characteristics and its microbial interaction with N. vitripennis. The type strain of A. nasoniae is Strain SKI4.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tritrophic interactions in plant defense</span> Ecological interactions

Tritrophic interactions in plant defense against herbivory describe the ecological impacts of three trophic levels on each other: the plant, the herbivore, and its natural enemies. They may also be called multitrophic interactions when further trophic levels, such as soil microbes, endophytes, or hyperparasitoids are considered. Tritrophic interactions join pollination and seed dispersal as vital biological functions which plants perform via cooperation with animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holobiont</span> Host and associated species living as a discrete ecological unit

A holobiont is an assemblage of a host and the many other species living in or around it, which together form a discrete ecological unit through symbiosis, though there is controversy over this discreteness. The components of a holobiont are individual species or bionts, while the combined genome of all bionts is the hologenome. The holobiont concept was initially introduced by the German theoretical biologist Adolf Meyer-Abich in 1943, and then apparently independently by Dr. Lynn Margulis in her 1991 book Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation. The concept has evolved since the original formulations. Holobionts include the host, virome, microbiome, and any other organisms which contribute in some way to the functioning of the whole. Well-studied holobionts include reef-building corals and humans.

Obligate mutualism is a special case of mutualism where an ecological interaction between species mutually benefits each other, and one or all species are unable to survive without the other. In some obligate relationships, only one species is dependent on the relationship. For example, a parasite may require a host in order to reproduce and survive, while the host does not depend at all on the parasite. Fig and fig wasps are an example of a co-obligate relationship, where both species are totally dependent on the relationship. The fig plant is entirely dependent on the fig wasp for pollination, and the fig wasp requires the fig plant for reproductive purposes. Many insect-fungi relationships are also co-obligate: the insect disperses, and in some cases protects, the fungi while the fungi provide nutrients for the insects. This interaction allows insects and fungi to, as a group, inhabit previously inhospitable or unreachable environments. Though obligate relationships need not be limited to two species, they are often discussed as such, with the relationship being made up of a host and a symbiont, though the terms are often attributed arbitrarily.

References

  1. Schowalter, Timothy Duane (2006). Insect ecology: an ecosystem approach (2(illustrated) ed.). Academic Press. p. 572. ISBN   978-0-12-088772-9 . Retrieved 17 July 2010.
  2. Mbaluto, Crispus M.; Ayelo, Pascal M.; Duffy, Alexandra G.; Erdei, Anna L.; Tallon, Anaїs K.; Xia, Siyang; Caballero-Vidal, Gabriela; Spitaler, Urban; Szelényi, Magdolna O.; Duarte, Gonçalo A.; Walker, William B.; Becher, Paul G. (2020-12-01). "Insect chemical ecology: chemically mediated interactions and novel applications in agriculture". Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 14 (6): 671–684. Bibcode:2020APInt..14..671M. doi:10.1007/s11829-020-09791-4. ISSN   1872-8847. PMC   7650581 . PMID   33193908.
  3. 1 2 Kessler, André (2012-05-23), "Chemical Ecology", Ecology, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0023, ISBN   978-0-19-983006-0 , retrieved 2024-10-08
  4. Ahmad, F., Aslam, M., & Razaq, M. (2004). Chemical ecology of insects and tritrophic interactions. Interactions, 15(2).
  5. 1 2 Hulcr, Jiri; Mann, Rajinder; Stelinski, Lukasz L. (2011-12-01). "The Scent of a Partner: Ambrosia Beetles Are Attracted to Volatiles from Their Fungal Symbionts". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37 (12): 1374–1377. Bibcode:2011JCEco..37.1374H. doi:10.1007/s10886-011-0046-x. ISSN   1573-1561. PMID   22161224.
  6. 1 2 3 Srinivas, M.N.; Shiva Reddy, K.; Sabarmathi, A. (June 2014). "Optimal harvesting strategy and stochastic analysis for a two species commensaling system". Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 5 (2): 515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2013.10.003 . ISSN   2090-4479.
  7. 1 2 Mathis, Kaitlyn A.; Bronstein, Judith L. (2020-11-02). "Our Current Understanding of Commensalism". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 51 (1): 167–189. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-040844. ISSN   1543-592X.
  8. Gullan, P.J.; Cranston, P.S. (2005). The insects: an outline of entomology (3 (illustrated, revised) ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 505. ISBN   978-1-4051-1113-3 . Retrieved 17 Jul 2010.
  9. Speight, Martin R.; Hunter, Mark D.; Watt, Allan D. (1999). Ecology of insects: concepts and applications (4(Illustrated) ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. p. 350. ISBN   978-0-86542-745-7 . Retrieved 2010-07-24.
  10. Schowalter, T. (2006). Insect Ecology : An Ecosystem Approach. 2nd ed. [ebook] Academic Press, pp.1-585. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/csum/reader.action?docID=10225026 [Accessed 11 April 2017].
  11. 1 2 Nishida, Ritsuo (2014-01-02). "Chemical ecology of insect–plant interactions: ecological significance of plant secondary metabolites". Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 78 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/09168451.2014.877836. hdl: 2433/198902 . ISSN   0916-8451. PMID   25036477.
  12. Price, Peter W.; Denno, Robert F.; Eubanks, Micky D.; Finke, Deborah L.; Kaplan, Ian (2011-08-18). Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-50443-0.
  13. Luisa, Bozzano G. (2012-12-02). Insect-Fungus Interactions. Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-08-098453-7.
  14. Schowalter, Timothy D. (2016-07-29). Insect Ecology: An Ecosystem Approach. Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-12-803037-0.
  15. Capinera, J. (2010). Insects and Wildlife : Arthropods and their Relationships with Wild Vertebrate Animals. 2nd ed. [ebook] Wiley-Blackwell, pp.1-501. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/csum/reader.action?docID=10366557 [Accessed 11 April 2017].
  16. Eggleton, Paul; Gaston, Kevin J. (December 1990). ""Parasitoid" Species and Assemblages: Convenient Definitions or Misleading Compromises?". Oikos. 59 (3): 417. doi:10.2307/3545155. ISSN   0030-1299. JSTOR   3545155.
  17. Godfray, H. Charles J. (1994-12-31). Parasitoids. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691207025. ISBN   978-0-691-20702-5.
  18. Santos, Ana M. C.; Quicke, Donald L. J. (October 2011). "Large-scale diversity patterns of parasitoid insects: Parasitoid diversity patterns". Entomological Science. 14 (4): 371–382. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2011.00481.x.
  19. 1 2 Hardy, Nate B.; Kaczvinsky, Chloe; Bird, Gwendolyn; Normark, Benjamin B. (2020-11-02). "What We Don't Know About Diet-Breadth Evolution in Herbivorous Insects". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics . 51 (1). Annual Reviews: 103–122. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-023322 . ISSN   1543-592X. S2CID   225521141.
  20. Meiners, Torsten (2015-04-01). "Chemical ecology and evolution of plant–insect interactions: a multitrophic perspective". Current Opinion in Insect Science. Ecology * Parasites/Parasitoids/Biological control. 8: 22–28. Bibcode:2015COIS....8...22M. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.02.003. ISSN   2214-5745. PMID   32846665.
  21. Howe, Gregg A.; Jander, Georg (2008-06-01). "Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores". Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59 (1): 41–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825. ISSN   1543-5008. PMID   18031220.
  22. War, Abdul Rashid; Paulraj, Michael Gabriel; Ahmad, Tariq; Buhroo, Abdul Ahad; Hussain, Barkat; Ignacimuthu, Savarimuthu; Sharma, Hari Chand (October 2012). "Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores". Plant Signaling & Behavior. 7 (10): 1306–1320. Bibcode:2012PlSiB...7.1306W. doi:10.4161/psb.21663. ISSN   1559-2324. PMC   3493419 . PMID   22895106.
  23. Chapman, R. F. (2003). "Contact Chemoreception in Feeding by Phytophagous Insects". Annual Review of Entomology . 48 (1). Annual Reviews: 455–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112629. ISSN   0066-4170. PMID   12414737.
  24. Forrest, Jessica R. K. (2014-05-27). "Plant-pollinator interactions and phenological change: what can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations?". Oikos . 124 (1). Nordic Society Oikos (Wiley Publishing): 4–13. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.1082.397 . doi:10.1111/oik.01386. ISSN   0030-1299.
  25. Schowalter, Timothy D. (2011-01-01), Schowalter, Timothy D. (ed.), "17 - Summary and Synthesis", Insect Ecology (Third Edition), San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 513–523, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381351-0.00017-2, ISBN   978-0-12-381351-0 , retrieved 2022-11-15
  26. 1 2 Klepzig, Kier (2009). "Symbioses: A Key Driver of Insect Physiological Processes, Ecological Interactions, Evolutionary Diversification, and Impacts on Humans". Environmental Entomology. 38 (1): 67–77. doi:10.1603/022.038.0109. PMID   19791599 . Retrieved 2024-11-20.
  27. "Symbiosis".
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 Hosokawa, Takahiro; Fukatsu, Takema (2020-06-01). "Relevance of microbial symbiosis to insect behavior". Current Opinion in Insect Science. Pests and resistance * Behavioural ecology. 39: 91–100. Bibcode:2020COIS...39...91H. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2020.03.004 . ISSN   2214-5745. PMID   32371358.
  29. Hosokawa, Takahiro; Fukatsu, Takema (2020-06-01). "Relevance of microbial symbiosis to insect behavior". Current Opinion in Insect Science. Pests and resistance * Behavioural ecology. 39: 91–100. Bibcode:2020COIS...39...91H. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2020.03.004. ISSN   2214-5745. PMID   32371358.
  30. Paracer, Surindar; Ahmadjian, Vernon (2000). Symbiosis: An Introduction to Biological Associations. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-511807-0.
  31. 1 2 academic.oup.com https://academic.oup.com/ee/article/38/1/67/490091 . Retrieved 2024-11-20.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  32. Douglas, Angela E. (2014-11-25). "The Molecular Basis of Bacterial–Insect Symbiosis". Journal of Molecular Biology. Insights Into Molecular Mechanisms of Microbiota. 426 (23): 3830–3837. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.005. ISSN   0022-2836. PMC   4385585 . PMID   24735869.
  33. Piel, Jörn (2002-10-29). "A polyketide synthase-peptide synthetase gene cluster from an uncultured bacterial symbiont of Paederus beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (22): 14002–14007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222481399 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   137826 . PMID   12381784.
  34. Cornwallis, Charlie K.; van ’t Padje, Anouk; Ellers, Jacintha; Klein, Malin; Jackson, Raphaella; Kiers, E. Toby; West, Stuart A.; Henry, Lee M. (July 2023). "Symbioses shape feeding niches and diversification across insects". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7 (7): 1022–1044. Bibcode:2023NatEE...7.1022C. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02058-0. ISSN   2397-334X. PMC   10333129 . PMID   37202501.
  35. Ectosymbiosis in wood-inhabiting insects . Symbiosis volume II: associations of invertebrates, birds, ruminants, and other biota (2nd ed.). New York. 1967. pp. 141–205In.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  36. Noë, Ronald; Hammerstein, Peter (1994-07-01). "Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 35 (1): 1–11. Bibcode:1994BEcoS..35....1N. doi:10.1007/BF00167053. ISSN   1432-0762.
  37. Hulcr, Jiri; Stelinski, Lukasz L. (2017-01-31). "The Ambrosia Symbiosis: From Evolutionary Ecology to Practical Management". Annual Review of Entomology. 62 (1): 285–303. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035105. ISSN   0066-4170. PMID   27860522.
  38. Biedermann, Peter H. W.; Taborsky, Michael (2011-10-11). "Larval helpers and age polyethism in ambrosia beetles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (41): 17064–17069. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10817064B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107758108 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3193236 . PMID   21969580.
  39. Müller-Schwarze, Dietland (2009), "Mutualism: Effects of Ants on Aphids, Their Predators, and Host Plants", Hands-On Chemical Ecology, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 3–6, doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0378-5_1, ISBN   978-1-4419-0377-8 , retrieved 2024-11-11
  40. Sudakaran, Sailendharan; Kost, Christian; Kaltenpoth, Martin (2017-05-01). "Symbiont Acquisition and Replacement as a Source of Ecological Innovation". Trends in Microbiology. 25 (5): 375–390. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.014. ISSN   0966-842X. PMID   28336178.
  41. Shigenobu, Shuji; Watanabe, Hidemi; Hattori, Masahira; Sakaki, Yoshiyuki; Ishikawa, Hajime (September 2000). "Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS". Nature. 407 (6800): 81–86. Bibcode:2000Natur.407...81S. doi:10.1038/35024074. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   10993077.
  42. Blow, Frances; Bueno, Eduardo; Clark, Noah; Zhu, Dan Tong; Chung, Seung Ho; Güllert, Simon; Schmitz, Ruth A.; Douglas, Angela E. (2020-10-01). "B-vitamin nutrition in the pea aphid-Buchnera symbiosis". Journal of Insect Physiology. 126: 104092. Bibcode:2020JInsP.12604092B. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104092. ISSN   0022-1910. PMID   32763248.
  43. Clausen, C P (January 1976). "Phoresy Among Entomophagous Insects". Annual Review of Entomology. 21 (1): 343–368. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.002015. ISSN   0066-4170.
  44. "Insect Parasitoids: Important Natural Enemies of Pests | Entomology". entomology.ca.uky.edu. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
  45. 1 2 "Insect Ecology" (PDF). Jan 2015.
  46. Schulze, Ernst-Detlef; Beck, Erwin; Buchmann, Nina; Clemens, Stephan; Müller-Hohenstein, Klaus; Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael (2018-05-03), "Interactions Between Plants, Plant Communities and the Abiotic and Biotic Environment", Plant Ecology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 689–741, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56233-8_19, ISBN   978-3-662-56231-4 , retrieved 2024-10-26
  47. Cusumano, Antonino; Peri, Ezio; Colazza, Stefano (2016-04-01). "Interspecific competition/facilitation among insect parasitoids". Current Opinion in Insect Science. Ecology * Parasites/Parasitoids/Biological control. 14: 12–16. Bibcode:2016COIS...14...12C. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.11.006. ISSN   2214-5745. PMID   27436641.
  48. Sapkota, Anupama (2022-07-08). "Amensalism (Antagonism) Interaction- Definition, Types, Examples". The Biology Notes. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
  49. University, Georgia State. "The Strange World of Insects That Mimic Other Insects". Treehugger. Retrieved 2024-04-13.
  50. Farooq, Muhammad; Jabran, Khawar; Cheema, Zahid A.; Wahid, Abdul; Siddique, Kadambot H. M. (May 2011). "The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management". Pest Management Science. 67 (5): 493–506. doi:10.1002/ps.2091. ISSN   1526-4998. PMID   21254327.
  51. "Coevolution". obo. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
  52. "Coevolution | Definition, Examples, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
  53. New, T. R. (2006-10-05). "D. Grimaldi and M. S. Engel, Evolution of the Insects". Journal of Insect Conservation. 11 (2): 211–212. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9003-3. ISSN   1366-638X.
  54. Leal, Laura C.; Andersen, Alan N.; Leal, Inara R. (2013-07-30). "Anthropogenic disturbance reduces seed-dispersal services for myrmecochorous plants in the Brazilian Caatinga". Oecologia. 174 (1): 173–181. doi:10.1007/s00442-013-2740-6. ISSN   0029-8549. PMID   23897500.
  55. Culliney, Thomas (2013-09-25). "Role of Arthropods in Maintaining Soil Fertility". Agriculture. 3 (4): 629–659. doi: 10.3390/agriculture3040629 . ISSN   2077-0472.
  56. van Huis, Arnold (2013-01-07). "Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security". Annual Review of Entomology. 58 (1): 563–583. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704. ISSN   0066-4170. PMID   23020616.
  57. Belluco, Simone; Losasso, Carmen; Maggioletti, Michela; Alonzi, Cristiana C.; Paoletti, Maurizio G.; Ricci, Antonia (2013-04-08). "Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review". Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 12 (3): 296–313. doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12014. ISSN   1541-4337.

Bibliography