List of pre-Socratic philosophers

Last updated

Pre-Socratic philosophy developed in ancient Greece during the 6th and 5th centuries BC. [1] [2] The pre-Socratic philosophers include those who preceded Socrates and Plato, though in some cases it is used to describe their contemporaries or later figures who continued pre-Socratic thought. [3] [4] The pre-Socratic philosophers were followed by the classical philosophers, including Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. [5]

Contents

Diels–Kranz numbering, developed by Hermann Alexander Diels and Walther Kranz in the early 20th century, is the standard for classifying the pre-Socratic philosophers. [6] Most information about the pre-Socratic philosophers is lost, with current knowledge being obtained from the records kept by later doxographers and philosophers. [1] [7] These include Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch, Sextus Empiricus, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus of Rome, Diogenes Laertius, Stobaeus, and Simplicius of Cilicia, among others. [8]

The pre-Socratic philosophers are organised by their belief systems, called schools, in which one followed or expanded on the teachings of his predecessors. New schools developed as philosophers criticised or responded to one another. [8] Each pre-Socratic philosopher and school engaged in natural inquiry, but their subjects, methods, and motivations varied significantly. [9]

The pre-Socratics were the first Western philosophers and began with the Ionian school that believed in material monism. The original Ionians were the Milesians: Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes. They were succeeded by the Ionian Heraclitus, Pythagoras of the Pythagorean school, the theology of Xenophanes, and Parmenides of the Eleatic school. The Elatics were challenged by the pluralist philosophy of Empedocles and Anaxagoras and the atomist philosophy of Leucippus and Democritus. The Sophists then taught rhetoric and moral philosophy. Pre-Socratic philosophy was preceded by the works of poets and theologians like Homer and Hesiod.

Ionians

Western philosophy originated with the Ionian school. [10] They were material monists who believed that there was a single underlying material origin of all that exists, an arche , made up of a specific element. [11] The first of the Ionian philosophers were from the city-state Miletus. The Milesian school was the first group to use inquiry instead of mythology to study nature, developing their philosophy in the 6th century BC. [10]

Ionian philosophy continued with Heraclitus, who challenged some of the ideas of the Milesians. [19]

Xenophanes

Eleatics

The Eleatics rejected the concepts of change and pluralism. [35] They were active in the 5th century BC. [36]

Pluralists

The pluralists rejected the monist belief of the Ionians that all things are made up of a single element. [44] Instead, they believed that there are multiple discrete elements that make up the world. [45] Pluralism was a response to the Eleatic school. [46] They were active in the 5th century BC. [27] [47]

Atomists

The atomists believed that all of existence consists of either indivisible atoms or the Void that exists around and between them. [58] Atomism was a response to the Eleatic school. [46]

Students of the pre-Socratic atomists brought the philosophy into the Hellenistic era, including Hecataeus of Abdera, Apollodorus of Cyzicus, Nausiphanes, Diotimus of Tyre  [ la ], Bion of Abdera, Bolus of Mendes, [62] Diogenes of Smyrna  [ de ], Anaxarchus, [63] Nessos of Chios, [64] and Metrodorus of Chios. [65] They were succeeded by Epicurus and his atomist school of Epicureanism. [60]

Pythagoreans

The first Italian philosophers were immigrants from Ionia. The most prominent of these was Pythagoras, who founded his philosophy of Pythagoreanism in the 6th century BC. [66] This is the only ancient Greek philosophical movement in which a single person is considered its formal leader. [67] Pythagoreanism was based on the idea that numbers are the basis of all things. [68] There was no single defining trait shared by all of the Pythagoreans, and they engaged in a variety of pursuits that included athletics, mathematics, medicine, natural philosophy, and politics. [69] Iamblichus identified 235 Pythagoreans by name, [70] but the associated identity for many of these names is unknown. [71]

Pythagoras is said to have sorted his followers into two groups: the students that were taught his philosophy in full, and the auditors who were only allowed limited knowledge. [73] Pythagoreanism was religious as well as philosophical, and there is sometimes disagreement over how involved one had to be with Pythagorean ideas to be considered a Pythagorean. [74]

Later writers classified the Pythagorean into two schools, the mathematikoi and the akousmatikoi, in the 5th century BC. [102] These were allegedly grown from the students and the auditors, respectively. [103] The akousmatikoi was more interested in ritual, while the mathematici paid closer attention to scientific inquiry. [104]

Three later Pythagoreans were described by Aristoxenus. [140]

Three Pythagoreans are grouped for claiming discovery of the types of proportion. [141]

Some Pythagoreans were known primarily for their athletic abilities and their performances in the Ancient Olympic Games. [69]

The final generation of Pythagoreans was active in Phlius where they studied under Philolaus and Eurytus. [124] They were contemporaries of Socrates. [143]

Pythagoreanism remained a major philosophical school until the 4th century BC as violent attacks against its followers ended the movement. [152] Some philosophers continued pre-Socratic Pythagoreanism as contemporaries of Plato or Aristotle. [153]

The Peripatetic school later recorded the ideas of the Pythagoreans. [161] Pythagorean ideas were combined with Plato's by the Neopythagoreans in the 1st century BC, who were then succeeded by the Neoplatonists in the 3rd century AD. [152]

Sophists

The Sophists were rhetoricians and political theorists [162] who sold their services as teachers. [163] They did not adhere to a unified school of philosophy. [164] They instead focused on human development and improvement, [165] and they were the first to engage in moral philosophy. [166] The Sophists were an exception among the early Greek thinkers in that they did not include cosmogony in their studies. [167] It is debated as to whether they were true philosophers, but they are generally described alongside the pre-Socratics in modern study. [168] [169] They were active in the 5th century BC. [166]

The first two Sophists followed the system of rhetoric attributed to Corax and Tisias. [170]

Protagoras and Gorgias were followed by five more Sophists, and the seven are grouped Hermann Alexander Diels as the Older Sophists who were active in the late 5th and early 4th centuries BC. [180]

Other Sophists were active during the time of Socrates.

There are two Sophists whose writings have survived but whose names are unknown. [186]

A Second Sophistic movement existed in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD, but it did not retain the philosophical elements of the original Sophist movement. [216]

Other philosophers

Precursors

Several poets and theologians who preceded the Milesian school provided early considerations of philosophical issues, often through mythological explanations. Although they were not philosophers, they are sometimes described in the context of pre-Socratic philosophy and its early development. [243] [244] [245] Among them are figures of the 7th and 6th centuries BC who were sometimes grouped as the Seven Sages of Greece, but the list of names was not consistent. [246]

Notes

  1. 1 2 Long 1999, p. 1.
  2. Curd & Graham 2008, p. 3.
  3. Long 1999, pp. 6–7.
  4. Freeman 1966, p. xiii.
  5. Curd & Graham 2008, p. 9.
  6. Runia 2008, p. 28.
  7. Curd & Graham 2008, pp. 4–5.
  8. 1 2 Long 1999, pp. 1–2.
  9. Long 1999, pp. 2–3.
  10. 1 2 McKirahan 2011, p. 20.
  11. Barnes 2012, p. 39.
  12. McKirahan 2011, p. 5.
  13. Freeman 1966, pp. 49–50.
  14. McKirahan 2011, p. 19.
  15. McKirahan 2011, p. 34.
  16. Long 1999, p. 9.
  17. Barnes 2012, p. 38.
  18. Barnes 2012, pp. 42–44.
  19. Barnes 2012, p. 61.
  20. Barnes 2012, p. 60.
  21. Long 1999, p. xxii.
  22. Freeman 1966, p. 285.
  23. Barnes 2012, pp. 68–69.
  24. Guthrie 1965, p. 358.
  25. Freeman 1966, p. 284.
  26. Barnes 2012, p. 96.
  27. 1 2 3 Long 1999, p. xx.
  28. Barnes 2012, p. 571.
  29. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 279.
  30. Curnow 2011, p. 174.
  31. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 164.
  32. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, pp. 169–170.
  33. Waterfield 2000, p. 22.
  34. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 75.
  35. Sedley 1999, p. 113.
  36. Long 1999, p. xxiii–xxiv, xxviii.
  37. Long 1999, p. xxiv.
  38. Waterfield 2000, pp. 50–51.
  39. Long 1999, p. xxviii.
  40. Barnes 2012, pp. 233–234.
  41. Long 1999, pp. xxiii–xxiv.
  42. McKirahan 2011, pp. 296–297.
  43. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 68.
  44. Graham 1999, p. 171.
  45. Waterfield 2000, p. 134.
  46. 1 2 Algra 1999, p. 54.
  47. Waterfield 2000, p. 332.
  48. 1 2 Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 433.
  49. Waterfield 2000, p. 135.
  50. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 358.
  51. Long 1999, p. xvii.
  52. Barnes 2012, p. 581.
  53. Mansfeld 1999, p. 43.
  54. 1 2 3 Curnow 2011, p. 39.
  55. Curnow 2011, p. 70.
  56. Freeman 1966, p. 277.
  57. Curnow 2011, p. 210.
  58. Waterfield 2000, pp. 164–165.
  59. Long 1999, p. xxiii.
  60. 1 2 Waterfield 2000, p. 164.
  61. Long 1999, p. xix.
  62. Freeman 1966, pp. 333–338.
  63. Freeman 1966, p. 330.
  64. Freeman 1966, p. 326.
  65. Barnes 2012, p. 404.
  66. 1 2 3 Barnes 2012, p. 100.
  67. 1 2 Long 1999, p. 2.
  68. Waterfield 2000, p. 90.
  69. 1 2 3 4 Zhmud 2014, p. 90.
  70. Freeman 1966, p. 244.
  71. Waterfield 2000, p. 88.
  72. 1 2 3 Waterfield 2000, p. 87.
  73. Freeman 1966, p. 74.
  74. 1 2 3 Huffman 2008, p. 292.
  75. Curnow 2011, p. 7.
  76. Curnow 2011, p. 15.
  77. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 84.
  78. 1 2 3 4 Curnow 2011, p. 65.
  79. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Huffman 2008, p. 300.
  80. Curnow 2011, p. 92.
  81. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 87.
  82. Curnow 2011, p. 95.
  83. Freeman 1966, p. 83.
  84. 1 2 3 Curnow 2011, p. 76.
  85. Curnow 2011, p. 90.
  86. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 109.
  87. Curnow 2011, p. 127.
  88. 1 2 3 Huffman 1999, p. 78.
  89. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 235.
  90. Freeman 1966, p. 85.
  91. Waterfield 2000, p. 108.
  92. Curnow 2011, p. 189.
  93. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 191.
  94. Curnow 2011, p. 202.
  95. Freeman 1966, p. 88.
  96. Curnow 2011, p. 208.
  97. Waterfield 2000, pp. 113–114.
  98. Curnow 2011, p. 258.
  99. Curnow 2011, p. 270.
  100. Curnow 2011, p. 271.
  101. Curnow 2011, p. 281.
  102. Zhmud 2014, pp. 92–93.
  103. Freeman 1966, p. 75.
  104. Barnes 2012, pp. 101–102.
  105. Huffman 2008, p. 296.
  106. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 140.
  107. 1 2 3 Freeman 1966, p. 233.
  108. Curnow 2011, p. 54.
  109. 1 2 3 Freeman 1966, p. 241.
  110. Curnow 2011, p. 115.
  111. Barnes 2012, pp. 74, 87.
  112. Freeman 1966, p. 133.
  113. Curnow 2011, p. 134.
  114. Freeman 1966, p. 209.
  115. Barnes 2012, pp. 11, 96.
  116. Freeman 1966, p. 210.
  117. Curnow 2011, p. 153.
  118. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 206.
  119. Barnes 2012, p. 381.
  120. 1 2 Huffman 1999, p. 84.
  121. Curnow 2011, p. 181.
  122. Freeman 1966, p. 204.
  123. Curnow 2011, p. 186.
  124. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Huffman 2008, p. 299.
  125. Freeman 1966, pp. 239–240.
  126. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 201.
  127. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 220.
  128. 1 2 3 4 Freeman 1966, p. 207.
  129. Curnow 2011, p. 257.
  130. Guthrie 1962, p. 219.
  131. Guthrie 1962, p. 268.
  132. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 261.
  133. Curnow 2011, p. 262.
  134. Freeman 1966, pp. 219–220.
  135. Curnow 2011, p. 267.
  136. 1 2 Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 216.
  137. Freeman 1966, p. 240.
  138. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 205.
  139. Curnow 2011, p. 285.
  140. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Freeman 1966, p. 242.
  141. 1 2 3 4 Freeman 1966, p. 243.
  142. 1 2 Zhmud 2014, p. 89.
  143. 1 2 3 4 5 Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 323.
  144. 1 2 Barnes 2012, p. 391.
  145. Waterfield 2000, pp. 92–93.
  146. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 324.
  147. Barnes 2012, p. 390.
  148. Freeman 1966, p. 232.
  149. Curnow 2011, p. 99.
  150. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 213.
  151. 1 2 Huffman 2008, p. 297.
  152. 1 2 McKirahan 2011, p. 80.
  153. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, pp. 216, 223.
  154. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 335.
  155. Waterfield 2000, p. 54.
  156. Barnes 2012, p. 240.
  157. Barnes 2012, p. 379.
  158. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 223.
  159. Huffman 1999, p. 70.
  160. Freeman 1966, pp. 243–244.
  161. Freeman 1966, p. 246.
  162. Long 1999, p. 3.
  163. McKirahan 2011, p. 363.
  164. Barnes 2012, p. 448.
  165. 1 2 3 Waterfield 2000, p. 205.
  166. 1 2 3 4 5 6 McKirahan 2011, p. 354.
  167. Long 1999, p. 5.
  168. Curd & Graham 2008, p. 8.
  169. McKirahan 2011, pp. 353–354.
  170. Woodruff 1999, p. 294.
  171. 1 2 Barnes 2012, p. 541.
  172. Barnes 2012, p. 545.
  173. Barnes 2012, p. 449.
  174. Barnes 2012, p. 173.
  175. McKirahan 2011, pp. 364–365.
  176. Barnes 2012, pp. 463–464.
  177. Waterfield 2000, p. 222.
  178. Barnes 2012, pp. 173, 235.
  179. 1 2 McKirahan 2011, p. 365.
  180. Freeman 1966, p. 341.
  181. McKirahan 2011, pp. 394–395.
  182. Barnes 2012, p. 509.
  183. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 87.
  184. Long 1999, pp. xxii–xxiii.
  185. Waterfield 2000, p. 251.
  186. 1 2 3 4 Woodruff 1999, p. 292.
  187. McKirahan 2011, p. 366.
  188. Curnow 2011, p. 152.
  189. Long 1999, p. xxv.
  190. Waterfield 2000, p. 241.
  191. Freeman 1966, p. 370.
  192. Waterfield 2000, pp. 270–271.
  193. Freeman 1966, p. 375.
  194. 1 2 Freeman 1966, p. 356.
  195. Curnow 2011, p. 24.
  196. Guthrie 1969, p. 37.
  197. Curnow 2011, p. 28.
  198. Curnow 2011, p. 36.
  199. Waterfield 2000, p. 300.
  200. McKirahan 2011, p. 397.
  201. Barnes 2012, pp. 453–456.
  202. Freeman 1966, p. 374.
  203. Curnow 2011, p. 97.
  204. 1 2 Waterfield 2000, p. xxvii.
  205. Curnow 2011, p. 129.
  206. Curnow 2011, p. 130.
  207. Curnow 2011, p. 138.
  208. Curnow 2011, p. 159.
  209. Freeman 1966, pp. 368–369.
  210. Curnow 2011, pp. 24, 192.
  211. Curnow 2011, p. 264.
  212. Curnow 2011, p. 268.
  213. Curnow 2011, pp. 24, 273.
  214. McKirahan 2011, pp. 405–406.
  215. Freeman 1966, p. 417.
  216. McKirahan 2011, p. 355.
  217. Freeman 1966, pp. 34–35.
  218. Most 1999, p. 340.
  219. Freeman 1966, p. 41.
  220. Curnow 2011, p. 11.
  221. McKirahan 2011, p. 85.
  222. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 347.
  223. Huffman 2008, p. 295.
  224. Curnow 2011, p. 16.
  225. Curnow 2011, p. 53.
  226. Curnow 2011, p. 73.
  227. Freeman 1966, p. 278.
  228. Curnow 2011, p. 86.
  229. Freeman 1966, pp. 207–208.
  230. Curnow 2011, p. 91.
  231. Curnow 2011, p. 126.
  232. Freeman 1966, p. 217.
  233. Freeman 1966, p. 218.
  234. 1 2 Freeman 1966, pp. 211–212.
  235. Curnow 2011, p. 197.
  236. Freeman 1966, pp. 215–216.
  237. Curnow 2011, p. 219.
  238. Curnow 2011, p. 226.
  239. Freeman 1966, pp. 214–215.
  240. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 81.
  241. Curnow 2011, pp. 152–153.
  242. Freeman 1966, p. 353.
  243. 1 2 Barnes 2012, p. 12.
  244. McKirahan 2011, p. 149.
  245. 1 2 Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 7.
  246. Freeman 1966, p. 44.
  247. 1 2 Freeman 1966, pp. 1–4.
  248. Freeman 1966, p. 9.
  249. Freeman 1966, p. 14.
  250. Freeman 1966, p. 5.
  251. Freeman 1966, p. 22.
  252. McKirahan 2011, pp. 357–358.
  253. Curnow 2011, p. 147.
  254. Curd 2008, p. 243.
  255. McKirahan 2011, p. 7.
  256. Curnow 2011, p. 40.
  257. Curnow 2011, p. 169.
  258. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, p. 47.
  259. Curnow 2011, p. 146.
  260. Curnow 2011, p. 192.
  261. Curnow 2011, p. 211.
  262. Freeman 1966, pp. 36–37.
  263. Freeman 1966, p. 38.
  264. Freeman 1966, pp. 37–38.
  265. Curnow 2011, p. 221.
  266. Curnow 2011, p. 251.
  267. Curnow 2011, p. 13.
  268. Curnow 2011, p. 21.
  269. Curnow 2011, p. 43.
  270. Curnow 2011, p. 62.
  271. Curnow 2011, p. 166.
  272. 1 2 Curnow 2011, p. 167.
  273. Curnow 2011, p. 204.
  274. Curnow 2011, p. 260.
  275. Kirk, Raven & Schofield 1983, pp. 19–20.
  276. Curnow 2011, p. 8.
  277. Freeman 1966, pp. 26, 28.
  278. Freeman 1966, p. 29.
  279. Freeman 1966, pp. 29–30.
  280. Guthrie 1962, p. 39.
  281. Curnow 2011, p. 118.
  282. McKirahan 2011, p. 359.
  283. McKirahan 2011, p. 361.
  284. Freeman 1966, p. 33.

References