MSH2

Last updated

MSH2
Protein MSH2 PDB 2o8b.png
Available structures
PDB Ortholog search: PDBe RCSB
Identifiers
Aliases MSH2 , mutS homolog 2, COCA1, FCC1, HNPCC, HNPCC1, LCFS2, hMMRCS2, MSH-2
External IDs OMIM: 609309; MGI: 101816; HomoloGene: 210; GeneCards: MSH2; OMA:MSH2 - orthologs
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez

4436

17685

Ensembl

ENSG00000095002

ENSMUSG00000024151

UniProt

P43246

P43247

RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_000251
NM_001258281

NM_008628

RefSeq (protein)

NP_000242
NP_001245210

NP_032654

Location (UCSC) Chr 2: 47.4 – 47.66 Mb Chr 17: 87.98 – 88.03 Mb
PubMed search [3] [4]
Wikidata
View/Edit Human View/Edit Mouse

DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 also known as MutS homolog 2 or MSH2 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MSH2 gene, which is located on chromosome 2. MSH2 is a tumor suppressor gene and more specifically a caretaker gene that codes for a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein, MSH2, which forms a heterodimer with MSH6 to make the human MutSα mismatch repair complex. It also dimerizes with MSH3 to form the MutSβ DNA repair complex. MSH2 is involved in many different forms of DNA repair, including transcription-coupled repair, [5] homologous recombination, [6] and base excision repair. [7]

Mutations in the MSH2 gene are associated with microsatellite instability and some cancers, especially with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). At least 114 disease-causing mutations in this gene have been discovered. [8]

Clinical significance

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), sometimes referred to as Lynch syndrome, is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, where inheritance of only one copy of a mutated mismatch repair gene is enough to cause disease phenotype. Mutations in the MSH2 gene account for 40% of genetic alterations associated with this disease and is the leading cause, together with MLH1 mutations. [9] Mutations associated with HNPCC are broadly distributed in all domains of MSH2, and hypothetical functions of these mutations based on the crystal structure of the MutSα include protein–protein interactions, stability, allosteric regulation, MSH2-MSH6 interface, and DNA binding. [10] Mutations in MSH2 and other mismatch repair genes cause DNA damage to go unrepaired, resulting in an increase in mutation frequency. These mutations build up over a person's life that otherwise would not have occurred had the DNA been repaired properly.

Microsatellite instability

The viability of MMR genes including MSH2 can be tracked via microsatellite instability, a biomarker test that analyzes short sequence repeats which are very difficult for cells to replicate without a functioning mismatch repair system. Because these sequences vary in the population, the actual number of copies of short sequence repeats does not matter, just that the number the patient does have is consistent from tissue to tissue and over time. This phenomenon occurs because these sequences are prone to mistakes by the DNA replication complex, which then need to be fixed by the mismatch repair genes. If these are not working, over time either duplications or deletions of these sequences will occur, leading to different numbers of repeats in the same patient.

71% of HNPCC patients show microsatellite instability. [11] Detection methods for microsatellite instability include polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemical (IHC) methods, polymerase chain checking the DNA and immunohistochemical surveying mismatch repair protein levels. "Currently, there are evidences that universal testing for MSI starting with either IHC or PCR-based MSI testing is cost effective, sensitive, specific and is generally widely accepted." [12]

Role in mismatch repair

In eukaryotes from yeast to humans, MSH2 dimerizes with MSH6 to form the MutSα complex, [13] which is involved in base mismatch repair and short insertion/deletion loops. [14] MSH2 heterodimerization stabilizes MSH6, which is not stable because of its N-terminal disordered domain. Conversely, MSH2 does not have a nuclear localization sequence (NLS), so it is believed that MSH2 and MSH6 dimerize in the cytoplasm and then are imported into the nucleus together. [15] In the MutSα dimer, MSH6 interacts with the DNA for mismatch recognition while MSH2 provides the stability that MSH6 requires. MSH2 can be imported into the nucleus without dimerizing to MSH6, in this case, MSH2 is probably dimerized to MSH3 to form MutSβ. [16] MSH2 has two interacting domains with MSH6 in the MutSα heterodimer, a DNA interacting domain, and an ATPase domain. [17]

The MutSα dimer scans double stranded DNA in the nucleus, looking for mismatched bases. When the complex finds one, it repairs the mutation in an ATP dependent manner. The MSH2 domain of MutSα prefers ADP to ATP, with the MSH6 domain preferring the opposite. Studies have indicated that MutSα only scans DNA with the MSH2 domain harboring ADP, while the MSH6 domain can contain either ADP or ATP. [18] MutSα then associates with MLH1 to repair the damaged DNA.

MutSβ is formed when MSH2 complexes with MSH3 instead of MSH6. This dimer repairs longer insertion/deletion loops than MutSα. [19] Because of the nature of the mutations that this complex repairs, this is probably the state of MSH2 that causes the microsatellite instability phenotype. Large DNA insertions and deletions intrinsically bend the DNA double helix. The MSH2/MSH3 dimer can recognize this topology and initiate repair. The mechanism by which it recognizes mutations is different as well, because it separates the two DNA strands, which MutSα does not. [20]

Double-strand break repair

Msh2 modulates accurate homologous recombination, a prominent DNA double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian chromosomes. [21] Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by accurate homologous recombination predominates over the inaccurate double-strand break repair pathway of “non-homologous end joining” in hamster, mouse and human somatic cells. [21]

Interactions

MSH2 has been shown to interact with:

Epigenetic MSH2 deficiencies in cancer

DNA damage appears to be the primary underlying cause of cancer, [34] and deficiencies in expression of DNA repair genes appear to underlie many forms of cancer. [35] [36] If DNA repair is deficient, DNA damage tends to accumulate. Such excess DNA damage may increase mutations due to error-prone translesion synthesis and error prone repair (see e.g. microhomology-mediated end joining). Elevated DNA damage may also increase epigenetic alterations due to errors during DNA repair. [37] [38] Such mutations and epigenetic alterations may give rise to cancer.

Reductions in expression of DNA repair genes (usually caused by epigenetic alterations) are very common in cancers, and are ordinarily much more frequent than mutational defects in DNA repair genes in cancers.[ citation needed ] (See Frequencies of epimutations in DNA repair genes.) In a study of MSH2 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), no mutations were found while 29% of NSCLC had epigenetic reduction of MSH2 expression. [39] In acute lymphoblastoid leukemia (ALL), no MSH2 mutations were found [40] while 43% of ALL patients showed MSH2 promoter methylation and 86% of relapsed ALL patients had MSH2 promoter methylation. [41] There were, however, mutations in four other genes in ALL patients that destabilized the MSH2 protein, and these were defective in 11% of children with ALL and 16% of adults with this cancer. [40]

Methylation of the promoter region of the MSH2 gene is correlated with the lack of expression of the MSH2 protein in esophageal cancer, [42] in non-small-cell lung cancer, [39] [43] and in colorectal cancer. [44] These correlations suggest that methylation of the promoter region of the MSH2 gene reduces expression of the MSH2 protein. Such promoter methylation would reduce DNA repair in the four pathways in which MSH2 participates: DNA mismatch repair, transcription-coupled repair [5] homologous recombination, [6] [45] [46] and base excision repair. [7] Such reductions in repair likely allow excess DNA damage to accumulate and contribute to carcinogenesis.

The frequencies of MSH2 promoter methylation in several different cancers are indicated in the Table.

MSH2 promoter methylation in sporadic cancers
CancerFrequency of MSH2 promoter methylationRef.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 43% [41]
Relapsed Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 86% [41]
Renal cell carcinoma 51–55% [47] [48]
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 29–48% [42] [49]
Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma 27–36% [50] [51] [52]
Non-small cell lung cancer 29–34% [39] [43]
Hepatocellular carcinoma 10–29% [53]
Colorectal cancer 3–24% [44] [54] [55] [56]
Soft-tissue sarcoma 8% [57]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA repair</span> Cellular mechanism

DNA repair is a collection of processes by which a cell identifies and corrects damage to the DNA molecules that encode its genome. In human cells, both normal metabolic activities and environmental factors such as radiation can cause DNA damage, resulting in tens of thousands of individual molecular lesions per cell per day. Many of these lesions cause structural damage to the DNA molecule and can alter or eliminate the cell's ability to transcribe the gene that the affected DNA encodes. Other lesions induce potentially harmful mutations in the cell's genome, which affect the survival of its daughter cells after it undergoes mitosis. As a consequence, the DNA repair process is constantly active as it responds to damage in the DNA structure. When normal repair processes fail, and when cellular apoptosis does not occur, irreparable DNA damage may occur. This can eventually lead to malignant tumors, or cancer as per the two-hit hypothesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer</span> Autosomal dominant genetic condition associated with a high risk of cancer in the colon

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a hereditary predisposition to colon cancer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neoplasm</span> Tumor or other abnormal growth of tissue

A neoplasm is a type of abnormal and excessive growth of tissue. The process that occurs to form or produce a neoplasm is called neoplasia. The growth of a neoplasm is uncoordinated with that of the normal surrounding tissue, and persists in growing abnormally, even if the original trigger is removed. This abnormal growth usually forms a mass, which may be called a tumour or tumor.

DNA glycosylases are a family of enzymes involved in base excision repair, classified under EC number EC 3.2.2. Base excision repair is the mechanism by which damaged bases in DNA are removed and replaced. DNA glycosylases catalyze the first step of this process. They remove the damaged nitrogenous base while leaving the sugar-phosphate backbone intact, creating an apurinic/apyrimidinic site, commonly referred to as an AP site. This is accomplished by flipping the damaged base out of the double helix followed by cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA mismatch repair</span> System for fixing base errors of DNA replication

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a system for recognizing and repairing erroneous insertion, deletion, and mis-incorporation of bases that can arise during DNA replication and recombination, as well as repairing some forms of DNA damage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microsatellite instability</span> Condition of genetic hypermutability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the condition of genetic hypermutability that results from impaired DNA mismatch repair (MMR). The presence of MSI represents phenotypic evidence that MMR is not functioning normally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muir–Torre syndrome</span> Medical condition

Muir–Torre syndrome is a rare hereditary, autosomal dominant cancer syndrome that is thought to be a subtype of HNPCC. Individuals are prone to develop cancers of the colon, genitourinary tract, and skin lesions, such as keratoacanthomas and sebaceous tumors. The genes affected are MLH1, MSH2, and more recently, MSH6, and are involved in DNA mismatch repair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MLH1</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 or MutL protein homolog 1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MLH1 gene located on chromosome 3. The gene is commonly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Orthologs of human MLH1 have also been studied in other organisms including mouse and the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MSH6</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

MSH6 or mutS homolog 6 is a gene that codes for DNA mismatch repair protein Msh6 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is the homologue of the human "G/T binding protein," (GTBP) also called p160 or hMSH6. The MSH6 protein is a member of the Mutator S (MutS) family of proteins that are involved in DNA damage repair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 is an enzyme that in humans is encoded by the PMS2 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Methylated-DNA-protein-cysteine methyltransferase</span> Mammalian protein found in Homo sapiens

Methylated-DNA--protein-cysteine methyltransferase(MGMT), also known as O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferaseAGT, is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MGMT gene. MGMT is crucial for genome stability. It repairs the naturally occurring mutagenic DNA lesion O6-methylguanine back to guanine and prevents mismatch and errors during DNA replication and transcription. Accordingly, loss of MGMT increases the carcinogenic risk in mice after exposure to alkylating agents. The two bacterial isozymes are Ada and Ogt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exonuclease 1</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Exonuclease 1 is an enzyme that in humans is encoded by the EXO1 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MSH3</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

DNA mismatch repair protein, MutS Homolog 3 (MSH3) is a human homologue of the bacterial mismatch repair protein MutS that participates in the mismatch repair (MMR) system. MSH3 typically forms the heterodimer MutSβ with MSH2 in order to correct long insertion/deletion loops and base-base mispairs in microsatellites during DNA synthesis. Deficient capacity for MMR is found in approximately 15% of colorectal cancers, and somatic mutations in the MSH3 gene can be found in nearly 50% of MMR-deficient colorectal cancers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MBD4</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MBD4 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PMS1</span> Protein-coding gene in humans

PMS1 protein homolog 1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the PMS1 gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MLH3</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh3 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MLH3 gene.

Mouse models of colorectal cancer and intestinal cancer are experimental systems in which mice are genetically manipulated, fed a modified diet, or challenged with chemicals to develop malignancies in the gastrointestinal tract. These models enable researchers to study the onset, progression of the disease, and understand in depth the molecular events that contribute to the development and spread of colorectal cancer. They also provide a valuable biological system, to simulate human physiological conditions, suitable for testing therapeutics.

Genome instability refers to a high frequency of mutations within the genome of a cellular lineage. These mutations can include changes in nucleic acid sequences, chromosomal rearrangements or aneuploidy. Genome instability does occur in bacteria. In multicellular organisms genome instability is central to carcinogenesis, and in humans it is also a factor in some neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or the neuromuscular disease myotonic dystrophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cancer epigenetics</span> Field of study in cancer research

Cancer epigenetics is the study of epigenetic modifications to the DNA of cancer cells that do not involve a change in the nucleotide sequence, but instead involve a change in the way the genetic code is expressed. Epigenetic mechanisms are necessary to maintain normal sequences of tissue specific gene expression and are crucial for normal development. They may be just as important, if not even more important, than genetic mutations in a cell's transformation to cancer. The disturbance of epigenetic processes in cancers, can lead to a loss of expression of genes that occurs about 10 times more frequently by transcription silencing than by mutations. As Vogelstein et al. points out, in a colorectal cancer there are usually about 3 to 6 driver mutations and 33 to 66 hitchhiker or passenger mutations. However, in colon tumors compared to adjacent normal-appearing colonic mucosa, there are about 600 to 800 heavily methylated CpG islands in the promoters of genes in the tumors while these CpG islands are not methylated in the adjacent mucosa. Manipulation of epigenetic alterations holds great promise for cancer prevention, detection, and therapy. In different types of cancer, a variety of epigenetic mechanisms can be perturbed, such as the silencing of tumor suppressor genes and activation of oncogenes by altered CpG island methylation patterns, histone modifications, and dysregulation of DNA binding proteins. There are several medications which have epigenetic impact, that are now used in a number of these diseases.

DNA methylation in cancer plays a variety of roles, helping to change the healthy cells by regulation of gene expression to a cancer cells or a diseased cells disease pattern. One of the most widely studied DNA methylation dysregulation is the promoter hypermethylation where the CPGs islands in the promoter regions are methylated contributing or causing genes to be silenced.

References

  1. 1 2 3 GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000095002 – Ensembl, May 2017
  2. 1 2 3 GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000024151 – Ensembl, May 2017
  3. ↑ "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ↑ "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. 1 2 Mellon I, Rajpal DK, Koi M, Boland CR, Champe GN (April 1996). "Transcription-coupled repair deficiency and mutations in human mismatch repair genes". Science. 272 (5261): 557–60. Bibcode:1996Sci...272..557M. doi:10.1126/science.272.5261.557. PMID   8614807. S2CID   13084965.
  6. 1 2 de Wind N, Dekker M, Berns A, Radman M, te Riele H (July 1995). "Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer". Cell. 82 (2): 321–30. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90319-4 . PMID   7628020. S2CID   7954019.
  7. 1 2 Pitsikas P, Lee D, Rainbow AJ (May 2007). "Reduced host cell reactivation of oxidative DNA damage in human cells deficient in the mismatch repair gene hMSH2". Mutagenesis. 22 (3): 235–43. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gem008 . PMID   17351251.
  8. ↑ Šimčíková D, Heneberg P (December 2019). "Refinement of evolutionary medicine predictions based on clinical evidence for the manifestations of Mendelian diseases". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 18577. Bibcode:2019NatSR...918577S. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54976-4. PMC   6901466 . PMID   31819097.
  9. ↑ Müller A, Fishel R (2002). "Mismatch repair and the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC)". Cancer Invest. 20 (1): 102–9. doi:10.1081/cnv-120000371. PMID   11852992. S2CID   3581304.
  10. ↑ Warren JJ, Pohlhaus TJ, Changela A, Iyer RR, Modrich PL, Beese LS (May 2007). "Structure of the human MutSalpha DNA lesion recognition complex". Mol. Cell. 26 (4): 579–92. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.018 . PMID   17531815.
  11. ↑ Bonis PA, Trikalinos TA, Chung M, Chew P, Ip S, DeVine DA, Lau J (May 2007). "Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications". Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) (150): 1–180. PMC   4781224 . PMID   17764220.
  12. ↑ Zhang X, Li J (February 2013). "Era of universal testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer". World J Gastrointest Oncol. 5 (2): 12–9. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i2.12 . PMC   3613766 . PMID   23556052.
  13. ↑ Hargreaves VV, Shell SS, Mazur DJ, Hess MT, Kolodner RD (March 2010). "Interaction between the Msh2 and Msh6 nucleotide-binding sites in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 complex". J. Biol. Chem. 285 (12): 9301–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.096388 . PMC   2838348 . PMID   20089866.
  14. ↑ Drummond JT, Li GM, Longley MJ, Modrich P (June 1995). "Isolation of an hMSH2-p160 heterodimer that restores DNA mismatch repair to tumor cells". Science. 268 (5219): 1909–12. Bibcode:1995Sci...268.1909D. doi:10.1126/science.7604264. PMID   7604264.
  15. ↑ Christmann M, Kaina B (November 2000). "Nuclear translocation of mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MSH6 as a response of cells to alkylating agents". J. Biol. Chem. 275 (46): 36256–62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005377200 . PMID   10954713.
  16. ↑ Edelbrock MA, Kaliyaperumal S, Williams KJ (February 2013). "Structural, molecular and cellular functions of MSH2 and MSH6 during DNA mismatch repair, damage signaling and other noncanonical activities". Mutat. Res. 743–744: 53–66. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.12.008. PMC   3659183 . PMID   23391514.
  17. 1 2 3 Guerrette S, Wilson T, Gradia S, Fishel R (November 1998). "Interactions of human hMSH2 with hMSH3 and hMSH2 with hMSH6: examination of mutations found in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer". Mol. Cell. Biol. 18 (11): 6616–23. doi:10.1128/mcb.18.11.6616. PMC   109246 . PMID   9774676.
  18. ↑ Qiu R, DeRocco VC, Harris C, Sharma A, Hingorani MM, Erie DA, Weninger KR (May 2012). "Large conformational changes in MutS during DNA scanning, mismatch recognition and repair signalling". EMBO J. 31 (11): 2528–40. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.95. PMC   3365432 . PMID   22505031.
  19. ↑ Dowen JM, Putnam CD, Kolodner RD (July 2010). "Functional studies and homology modeling of Msh2-Msh3 predict that mispair recognition involves DNA bending and strand separation". Mol. Cell. Biol. 30 (13): 3321–8. doi:10.1128/MCB.01558-09. PMC   2897569 . PMID   20421420.
  20. ↑ Gupta S, Gellert M, Yang W (January 2012). "Mechanism of mismatch recognition revealed by human MutSβ bound to unpaired DNA loops". Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19 (1): 72–8. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2175. PMC   3252464 . PMID   22179786.
  21. 1 2 Smith JA, Bannister LA, Bhattacharjee V, Wang Y, Waldman BC, Waldman AS. Accurate homologous recombination is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian chromosomes and is modulated by mismatch repair protein Msh2. Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Nov;27(22):7816-27. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00455-07. Epub 2007 Sep 10. PMID 17846123; PMCID: PMC2169143
  22. 1 2 3 Wang Y, Qin J (December 2003). "MSH2 and ATR form a signaling module and regulate two branches of the damage response to DNA methylation". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (26): 15387–92. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10015387W. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536810100 . PMC   307577 . PMID   14657349.
  23. ↑ Wang Q, Zhang H, Guerrette S, Chen J, Mazurek A, Wilson T, Slupianek A, Skorski T, Fishel R, Greene MI (August 2001). "Adenosine nucleotide modulates the physical interaction between hMSH2 and BRCA1". Oncogene. 20 (34): 4640–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204625 . PMID   11498787.
  24. 1 2 Wang Y, Cortez D, Yazdi P, Neff N, Elledge SJ, Qin J (April 2000). "BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures". Genes Dev. 14 (8): 927–39. doi:10.1101/gad.14.8.927. PMC   316544 . PMID   10783165.
  25. ↑ Adamson AW, Beardsley DI, Kim WJ, Gao Y, Baskaran R, Brown KD (March 2005). "Methylator-induced, mismatch repair-dependent G2 arrest is activated through Chk1 and Chk2". Mol. Biol. Cell. 16 (3): 1513–26. doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-02-0089. PMC   551512 . PMID   15647386.
  26. ↑ Brown KD, Rathi A, Kamath R, Beardsley DI, Zhan Q, Mannino JL, Baskaran R (January 2003). "The mismatch repair system is required for S-phase checkpoint activation". Nat. Genet. 33 (1): 80–4. doi:10.1038/ng1052. PMID   12447371. S2CID   20616220.
  27. ↑ Rasmussen LJ, Rasmussen M, Lee B, Rasmussen AK, Wilson DM, Nielsen FC, Bisgaard HC (June 2000). "Identification of factors interacting with hMSH2 in the fetal liver utilizing the yeast two-hybrid system. In vivo interaction through the C-terminal domains of hEXO1 and hMSH2 and comparative expression analysis". Mutat. Res. 460 (1): 41–52. doi:10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00012-4. PMID   10856833.
  28. ↑ Schmutte C, Marinescu RC, Sadoff MM, Guerrette S, Overhauser J, Fishel R (October 1998). "Human exonuclease I interacts with the mismatch repair protein hMSH2". Cancer Res. 58 (20): 4537–42. PMID   9788596.
  29. ↑ Schmutte C, Sadoff MM, Shim KS, Acharya S, Fishel R (August 2001). "The interaction of DNA mismatch repair proteins with human exonuclease I". J. Biol. Chem. 276 (35): 33011–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102670200 . PMID   11427529.
  30. ↑ Mac Partlin M, Homer E, Robinson H, McCormick CJ, Crouch DH, Durant ST, Matheson EC, Hall AG, Gillespie DA, Brown R (February 2003). "Interactions of the DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH2 with c-MYC and MAX". Oncogene. 22 (6): 819–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206252 . PMID   12584560.
  31. 1 2 Bocker T, Barusevicius A, Snowden T, Rasio D, Guerrette S, Robbins D, Schmidt C, Burczak J, Croce CM, Copeland T, Kovatich AJ, Fishel R (February 1999). "hMSH5: a human MutS homologue that forms a novel heterodimer with hMSH4 and is expressed during spermatogenesis". Cancer Res. 59 (4): 816–22. PMID   10029069.
  32. 1 2 Acharya S, Wilson T, Gradia S, Kane MF, Guerrette S, Marsischky GT, Kolodner R, Fishel R (November 1996). "hMSH2 forms specific mispair-binding complexes with hMSH3 and hMSH6". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (24): 13629–34. Bibcode:1996PNAS...9313629A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13629 . PMC   19374 . PMID   8942985.
  33. ↑ Scherer SJ, Welter C, Zang KD, Dooley S (April 1996). "Specific in vitro binding of p53 to the promoter region of the human mismatch repair gene hMSH2". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 221 (3): 722–8. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1996.0663. PMID   8630028.
  34. ↑ Kastan MB (April 2008). "DNA damage responses: mechanisms and roles in human disease: 2007 G.H.A. Clowes Memorial Award Lecture". Molecular Cancer Research. 6 (4): 517–24. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0020 . PMID   18403632.
  35. ↑ Harper JW, Elledge SJ (December 2007). "The DNA damage response: ten years after". Molecular Cell. 28 (5): 739–45. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015 . PMID   18082599.
  36. ↑ Dietlein F, Reinhardt HC (December 2014). "Molecular pathways: exploiting tumor-specific molecular defects in DNA repair pathways for precision cancer therapy". Clinical Cancer Research. 20 (23): 5882–7. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1165. PMID   25451105. S2CID   16005088.
  37. ↑ O'Hagan HM, Mohammad HP, Baylin SB (2008). "Double strand breaks can initiate gene silencing and SIRT1-dependent onset of DNA methylation in an exogenous promoter CpG island". PLOS Genetics. 4 (8): e1000155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000155 . PMC   2491723 . PMID   18704159.
  38. ↑ Cuozzo C, Porcellini A, Angrisano T, Morano A, Lee B, Di Pardo A, Messina S, Iuliano R, Fusco A, Santillo MR, Muller MT, Chiariotti L, Gottesman ME, Avvedimento EV (July 2007). "DNA damage, homology-directed repair, and DNA methylation". PLOS Genetics. 3 (7): e110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030110 . PMC   1913100 . PMID   17616978.
  39. 1 2 3 Wang YC, Lu YP, Tseng RC, Lin RK, Chang JW, Chen JT, Shih CM, Chen CY (2003). "Inactivation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 by promoter methylation in primary non-small cell lung tumors and matched sputum samples". J. Clin. Invest. 111 (6): 887–95. doi:10.1172/JCI15475. PMC   153761 . PMID   12639995.
  40. 1 2 Diouf B, Cheng Q, Krynetskaia NF, Yang W, Cheok M, Pei D, Fan Y, Cheng C, Krynetskiy EY, Geng H, Chen S, Thierfelder WE, Mullighan CG, Downing JR, Hsieh P, Pui CH, Relling MV, Evans WE (2011). "Somatic deletions of genes regulating MSH2 protein stability cause DNA mismatch repair deficiency and drug resistance in human leukemia cells". Nat. Med. 17 (10): 1298–303. doi:10.1038/nm.2430. PMC   3192247 . PMID   21946537.
  41. 1 2 3 Wang CX, Wang X, Liu HB, Zhou ZH (2014). "Aberrant DNA methylation and epigenetic inactivation of hMSH2 decrease overall survival of acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients via modulating cell cycle and apoptosis". Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 15 (1): 355–62. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.1.355 . PMID   24528056.
  42. 1 2 Ling ZQ, Li P, Ge MH, Hu FJ, Fang XH, Dong ZM, Mao WM (2011). "Aberrant methylation of different DNA repair genes demonstrates distinct prognostic value for esophageal cancer". Dig. Dis. Sci. 56 (10): 2992–3004. doi:10.1007/s10620-011-1774-z. PMID   21674174. S2CID   22913110.
  43. 1 2 Hsu HS, Wen CK, Tang YA, Lin RK, Li WY, Hsu WH, Wang YC (2005). "Promoter hypermethylation is the predominant mechanism in hMLH1 and hMSH2 deregulation and is a poor prognostic factor in nonsmoking lung cancer". Clin. Cancer Res. 11 (15): 5410–6. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0601. PMID   16061855. S2CID   14444548.
  44. 1 2 Lee KH, Lee JS, Nam JH, Choi C, Lee MC, Park CS, Juhng SW, Lee JH (2011). "Promoter methylation status of hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT genes in colorectal cancer associated with adenoma-carcinoma sequence". Langenbecks Arch Surg. 396 (7): 1017–26. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0812-9. PMID   21706233. S2CID   8069716.
  45. ↑ Villemure JF, Abaji C, Cousineau I, Belmaaza A (2003). "MSH2-deficient human cells exhibit a defect in the accurate termination of homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks". Cancer Res. 63 (12): 3334–9. PMID   12810667.
  46. ↑ Elliott B, Jasin M (2001). "Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in mismatch repair-defective mammalian cells". Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (8): 2671–82. doi:10.1128/MCB.21.8.2671-2682.2001. PMC   86898 . PMID   11283247.
  47. ↑ Stoehr C, Burger M, Stoehr R, Bertz S, Ruemmele P, Hofstaedter F, Denzinger S, Wieland WF, Hartmann A, Walter B (2012). "Mismatch repair proteins hMLH1 and hMSH2 are differently expressed in the three main subtypes of sporadic renal cell carcinoma" (PDF). Pathobiology. 79 (3): 162–8. doi: 10.1159/000335642 . PMID   22378480. S2CID   26687941.
  48. ↑ Yoo KH, Won KY, Lim SJ, Park YK, Chang SG (2014). "Deficiency of MSH2 expression is associated with clear cell renal cell carcinoma". Oncol Lett. 8 (5): 2135–2139. doi:10.3892/ol.2014.2482. PMC   4186615 . PMID   25295100.
  49. ↑ Ling ZQ, Zhao Q, Zhou SL, Mao WM (2012). "MSH2 promoter hypermethylation in circulating tumor DNA is a valuable predictor of disease-free survival for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Eur J Surg Oncol. 38 (4): 326–32. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.01.008. PMID   22265839.
  50. ↑ Sengupta S, Chakrabarti S, Roy A, Panda CK, Roychoudhury S (2007). "Inactivation of human mutL homolog 1 and mutS homolog 2 genes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors and leukoplakia samples by promoter hypermethylation and its relation with microsatellite instability phenotype". Cancer. 109 (4): 703–12. doi:10.1002/cncr.22430. PMID   17219447. S2CID   20191692.
  51. ↑ Demokan S, Suoglu Y, Demir D, Gozeler M, Dalay N (2006). "Microsatellite instability and methylation of the DNA mismatch repair genes in head and neck cancer". Ann. Oncol. 17 (6): 995–9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl048. PMID   16569647.
  52. ↑ Czerninski R, Krichevsky S, Ashhab Y, Gazit D, Patel V, Ben-Yehuda D (2009). "Promoter hypermethylation of mismatch repair genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2 in oral squamous cell carcinoma". Oral Dis. 15 (3): 206–13. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01510.x. PMID   19207881.
  53. ↑ Hinrichsen I, Kemp M, Peveling-Oberhag J, Passmann S, Plotz G, Zeuzem S, Brieger A (2014). "Promoter methylation of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and p16 is a phenomenon of advanced-stage HCCs". PLOS ONE. 9 (1): e84453. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...984453H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084453 . PMC   3882222 . PMID   24400091.
  54. ↑ Vlaykova T, Mitkova A, Stancheva G, Kadiyska T, Gulubova M, Yovchev Y, Cirovski G, Chilingirov P, Damyanov D, Kremensky I, Mitev V, Kaneva R (2011). "Microsatellite instability and promoter hypermethylation of MLH1 and MSH2 in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer". J BUON. 16 (2): 265–73. PMID   21766496.
  55. ↑ Malhotra P, Anwar M, Kochhar R, Ahmad S, Vaiphei K, Mahmood S (2014). "Promoter methylation and immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancer: a study from India". Tumour Biol. 35 (4): 3679–87. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1487-3. PMID   24317816. S2CID   10615946.
  56. ↑ Onrat S, Ceken I, Ellidokuz E, Kupelioğlu A (2011). "Alterations of copy number of methylation pattern in mismatch repair genes by methylation specific-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in cases of colon cancer". Balkan J. Med. Genet. 14 (2): 25–34. doi:10.2478/v10034-011-0044-x. PMC   3776700 . PMID   24052709.
  57. ↑ Kawaguchi K, Oda Y, Saito T, Yamamoto H, Takahira T, Kobayashi C, Tamiya S, Tateishi N, Iwamoto Y, Tsuneyoshi M (2006). "DNA hypermethylation status of multiple genes in soft tissue sarcomas". Mod. Pathol. 19 (1): 106–14. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800502 . PMID   16258501.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.