National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa

Last updated

Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, 2013
Parliament of South Africa
CitationAct No. 37 of 2013
Enacted by Parliament of South Africa
Assented to23 January 2014
Commenced31 January 2015
Status: In force

The National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa (NFDD) is a national DNA database used in law enforcement in South Africa. The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act No. 37 of 2013 (the "DNA Act") provides for the expansion and administration of such a database in South Africa, enabling the South African Police Service (SAPS) to match forensic DNA profiles derived from samples collected at crime scenes with forensic DNA profiles of offenders convicted of, and suspects arrested for, offences listed in a new Schedule 8 of the amended Criminal Procedure Act of 1977.

Contents

Before the DNA Act: DCID

DNA profiling has been used in South African law enforcement since 1998, albeit without a legal framework prior to the commencement of the DNA Act. [1] [2] [3] The DNA Criminal Intelligence Database (DCID) was developed by SAPS and is administered by the Biology Unit of the SAPS Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL). [4] [5]

The repository of DNA Profiles held by the FSL prior to the commencement of the DNA Act comprises two indices, namely a Casework Index containing forensic DNA profiles derived from biological samples collected from crime scenes and a Reference Index containing forensic DNA profiles of known people, including victims, suspects, volunteers and personnel. [2] [6] [7] The Criminal Procedure Act of 1977 currently prevents DNA samples from being taken from convicted offenders. [8] [9] The DNA profiles in the DCID are generated by analysing an AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus STR multiplex system of 9 different STR loci (D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51, D5S818, D13S317 and D7S820) plus Amelogenin for sex determination. [10] [11] There were approximately 80,000 DNA profiles on the DCID in 2007, [8] with the number increasing to approximately 180,000 by late 2013. [2]

DNA Act: NFDD

DNA should be the first thing any detective thinks about. There is always a possibility that the suspect has been injured, that urine and spit could be at the scene. It's vital to secure that evidence. The first thing I would do is cordon off a crime scene and get forensics in. Nobody must be allowed onto that crime scene.
It is better than fingerprints. With DNA, there is no doubt. I believe this bill is fantastic. They must have the DNA profile of every person who has been arrested. This could have prevented more people from being murdered.

Former high profile SAPS investigator Piet Byleveld [12]

The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act No. 37 of 2013 (the "DNA Act") provides for the expansion, regulation and administration of a national DNA database known as the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa (NFDD). [2] [13] [14] The initial Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill drafted in 2008 was tabled in Parliament in 2009 and subsequently split into two separate bills. [1] [13] [15]

The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B2–2009], dealing with fingerprints and other body-prints, was assented to in 2010 and came into effect on 18 January 2013. [16] A separate bill unofficially known as the "DNA Bill" was re-introduced to Parliament in May 2013. [17] [18] [19] It addresses various concerns that arose regarding the initial bill, including those relating to human rights issues. [1] [6] [15] [20] The final version of the DNA Bill, namely the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B9D–2013], was passed by the National Assembly on 12 November 2013, [21] and was assented to by President Jacob Zuma on 23 January 2014. [22] The commencement date of the DNA Act is 31 January 2015. [7] [23] [24]

The DNA Act provides inter alia for: [2] [7]

The NFDD comprises six indices containing forensic DNA profiles, namely a Crime Scene Index, an Arrestee Index, a Convicted Offender (CO) index, an Investigative Index, an Elimination Index and a Missing Persons and Unidentified Human Remains Index. Mandatory DNA sampling applies to persons convicted of, and persons arrested for, offences listed in a new Schedule 8 of the amended Criminal Procedure Act of 1977. The offences listed in Schedule 8 may be amended after the initial implementation phase which takes into account capacity constraints. [2] [7] [25] The DNA profiles in the NFDD are generated by analysing 15 different STR loci plus Amelogenin for sex determination. [11] [26]

Different retention frameworks apply to each the six different indices. The Crime Scene Index contains forensic DNA profiles obtained from all crime scene samples (biological evidence collected from crime scenes) which will be held on the NFDD indefinitely. The Arrestee Index and Convicted Offender Index contains forensic DNA profiles of all persons arrested or convicted, as the case may be, of a Schedule 8 offence which range from rape and murder to burglary. Forensic DNA Profiles entered into the Arrestee Index will either be migrated to the Convicted Offender Index upon conviction, where they will be held indefinitely, or removed within three years if the arrest does not result in a conviction. Forensic DNA profiles obtained from volunteers with informed consent will be held under the Investigative Index and will be removed from the NFDD within 3 months of the case being finalised. [7]

The repository of DNA profiles held by the state FSL was expected to be transferred to the NFDD within 3 months of the DNA database being operational. [7] In 2013, the FSL was investigating implementing the Combined DNA Index System, which is the database and software developed by the FBI. [27]

The DNA Act is subject to a five-year implementation plan which takes into account new training and equipment requirements. [28] [29]

DNA Project

When the Bill is actually promulgated, only then will I breathe a transitory sigh of relief, because that will be when the real work begins. While the law may look good on paper, my mission is and has always been to see it translate into actual crime deterrence and reduction. Only when I see its effective implementation will I honestly say that we, as a team, have made a difference.

Vanessa Lynch, founder and executive director of the DNA Project [2]

As in Brazil, families of crime victims in South Africa have successfully campaigned for the establishment of a national forensic DNA database. [30] [31] [32] The DNA Project, a non-profit organisation, is an advocacy initiative founded by attorney Vanessa Lynch following the unsolved murder of Lynch's father, John Lynch, in 2004. [2] [8] [32]

The DNA Project advocates the establishment and expansion of a national forensic DNA database and hence earlier identification of criminal suspects. [8] [9] [33] It has campaigned for the passing of the DNA Bill, [2] donated laboratory equipment to the FSL, [34] funded the UK Forensic Science Service's diagnostic review of South Africa's FSL, [34] initiated DNA forensic awareness training programs, [35] and developed a post-graduate forensic analyst qualification. [36] [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same charges following an acquittal in the same jurisdiction. A variation in civil law countries is the peremptory plea, which may take the specific forms of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict. These doctrines appear to have originated in ancient Roman law, in the broader principle non bis in idem.

DNA profiling Technique used to identify individuals via DNA characteristics

DNA profiling is the process of determining an individual's DNA characteristics. DNA analysis intended to identify a species, rather than an individual, is called DNA barcoding.

A rape kit is a package of items used by medical personnel for gathering and preserving physical evidence following an allegation of sexual assault. The evidence collected from the victim can aid the criminal rape investigation and the prosecution of a suspected assailant. DNA evidence can have tremendous utility for sexual assault investigations and prosecution by identifying offenders, revealing serial offenders through DNA matches across cases, and exonerating those who have been wrongly accused.

The United Kingdom National DNA Database is a national DNA Database that was set up in 1995. In 2005 it had 3.1 million profiles and in 2020 it had 6.6 million profiles. 270,000 samples were added to the database in 2019/20, populated by samples recovered from crime scenes and taken from police suspects. 124,000 were deleted for those not charged or not found guilty. There were 731,000 matches of unsolved crimes between 2001-2020.

DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000

The DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 is a United States Act of Congress that primarily allows US states to carry out DNA analyses for use in the FBI's Combined DNA Index System and to collect and analyse DNA samples.

A government database collects information for various reasons, including climate monitoring, securities law compliance, geological surveys, patent applications and grants, surveillance, national security, border control, law enforcement, public health, voter registration, vehicle registration, social security, and statistics.

A DNA database or DNA databank is a database of DNA profiles which can be used in the analysis of genetic diseases, genetic fingerprinting for criminology, or genetic genealogy. DNA databases may be public or private, the largest ones being national DNA databases.

Criminal Law Amendment Act is a stock short title used for legislation in the United Kingdom, the Republic of Ireland, Canada, India, Pakistan and South Africa which amends the criminal law. It tends to be used for Acts that do not have a single cohesive subject matter.

Worlds End Murders Crime in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1977

The World's End Murders is the colloquial name given to the murder of two girls, Christine Eadie, 17, and Helen Scott, 17, in Edinburgh, in October 1977. The case is so named because both victims were last seen alive leaving The World's End pub in Edinburgh's Old Town. The only person to stand trial accused of the murders, Angus Sinclair, was acquitted in 2007 in controversial circumstances. Following the amendment of the law of double jeopardy, which would have prevented his retrial, Sinclair was retried in October 2014 and convicted of both murders on 14 November 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years, the longest sentence by a Scottish court, meaning he would have been 106 years old when he was eligible for a potential release on parole. He died at HM Prison Glenochil aged 73 on 11 March 2019. Coincidentally, he died on the same day the BBC's Crimewatch Roadshow programme profiled the murders.

Crimes Act 1961

The Crimes Act 1961 is an Act of the Parliament of New Zealand that forms a leading part of the criminal law in New Zealand. It repeals the Crimes Act 1908, itself a successor of the Criminal Code Act 1893. Most crimes in New Zealand are created by the Crimes Act, but some are created elsewhere. All common law offences are abolished by section 9, as are all offences against Acts of the British Parliaments, but section 20 saves the old common law defences where they are not specifically altered.

S and Marper v United Kingdom [2008] ECHR 1581 is a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights which held that holding DNA samples of individuals arrested but who are later acquitted or have the charges against them dropped is a violation of the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Debbie Smith Act Law to fund DNA analyses of backlogged DNA samples collected from victims of crimes and criminal offenders

The Debbie Smith Act of 2004 provides United States federal government grants to eligible states and units of local government to conduct DNA analyses of backlogged DNA samples collected from victims of crimes and criminal offenders. The Act expands the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) and provides legal assistance to survivors of dating violence. Named after sexual assault survivor Debbie Smith, the Act was passed by the 108th Congress as part of larger legislation, the Justice for All Act of 2004, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 30, 2004. The Act amended the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, the DNA Identification Act of 1994, the Violence Against Women Act of 2000, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Act was reauthorized in 2008, extending the availability of DNA backlog reduction program grants, DNA evidence training and education program grants, and sexual assault forensic exam program grants through fiscal year 2014.

LGBT rights in New South Wales Rights of LGBT people in New South Wales, Australia

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the Australian state of New South Wales have most of the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexual cisgender people.

Combined DNA Index System

The Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) is the United States national DNA database created and maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. CODIS consists of three levels of information; Local DNA Index Systems (LDIS) where DNA profiles originate, State DNA Index Systems (SDIS) which allows for laboratories within states to share information, and the National DNA Index System (NDIS) which allows states to compare DNA information with one another.

The Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 is an act of the Parliament of South Africa that governs criminal procedure in South Africa's legal system. It details the procedure for the whole system of criminal law, including search and seizure, arrest, the filing of charges, bail, the plea, the testimony of witnesses and the law of evidence, the verdict and sentence, and appeal.

Forensic DNA Consultants

Forensic DNA Consultants (Pty) Ltd. (FDC) specialises in the provision of advisory and technical services related to the various aspects of forensic DNA profiling and analysis and their related laboratory, legal and administrative processes.

In Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), the United States Supreme Court decided that a cheek swab of an arrestee's DNA is comparable to fingerprinting and therefore, a legal police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 2014

The Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 2014 is a bill that would amend the Debbie Smith Act of 2004 in order to reauthorize funding through Fiscal Year 2019 for the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, sexual assault forensic exam program grants, and DNA training and education for law enforcement, correctional personnel, and court officers. The bill would authorize the appropriation of $968 million over the 2015-2019 period. The grant program would go to the states to run programs to analyze DNA samples from crime victims.

The DNA Based Technology Bill, 2017 or the Human DNA Profiling Bill is a proposed legislation in India. The bill will allow the government to establish a National DNA Data Bank and a DNA Profiling Board, and use the data for various specified forensic purposes. The bill has raised concerns of privacy among citizen rights groups. The bill was expected to be presented in the parliament in the monsoon session of 2015.

Forensic genealogy is the emerging practice of utilizing genetic information from direct-to-consumer companies for identifying suspects or victims in criminal cases. As of July, 2019, the use of this practice has led to the discovery of over 40 suspects of murder and sexual assault. The investigative power of forensic genealogy revolves around the use of open-source databases such as GEDMatch. Through GEDMatch, users are able to upload their genealogy results from direct-to-consumer companies in an effort to identify relatives.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Information regarding the latest DNA Bill". Forensic DNA Consultants. Archived from the original on 22 November 2013. Retrieved 22 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Venter, Irma (25 October 2013). "Will enlarged DNA database help police in crime fight?". Engineering News. Creamer Media. Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  3. ↑ Lynch, Vanessa (4 September 2013). "DNA bill will make it hard for criminals to hide". Cape Argus . Retrieved 5 September 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  4. ↑ "SAPS FAQ: About the Forensic Science Laboratory". South African Police Service . Retrieved 17 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  5. ↑ de Wet, S; Oosthuizen, H; Visser, J (15 July 2011). "DNA profiling and the law in South Africa". Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 14 (4): 171–207. doi: 10.4314/pelj.v14i4.6 . Retrieved 19 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  6. 1 2 Venter, Irma (12 June 2012). "Wednesday is crunch time for DNA database". Engineering News. Creamer Media. Retrieved 19 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act [No. 37 of 2013]" (PDF). Department of Justice. Retrieved 1 January 2015.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Carte Blanche: Forensics". M-Net. 2 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 September 2012.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  9. 1 2 Seale, Lebogang (12 June 2012). "barring easy escape". The Star . Retrieved 16 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  10. ↑ Meintjes-van der Walt, Lirieka (2008). "An overview of the use of DNA evidence in South African criminal courts". South African Journal of Criminal Justice. 21 (1): 22–62. Retrieved 19 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  11. 1 2 Hancock, Carolyn. "No need to question the validity of DNA evidence". DNA Project. Retrieved 20 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  12. ↑ Serrao, Angelique (13 November 2013). "DNA bill a huge help, says ex-top cop". The Star . Retrieved 20 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  13. 1 2 "South Africa: the current situation". DNA Project. Archived from the original on 15 March 2012. Retrieved 17 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  14. ↑ "A New DNA Bill". DNA Project. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 17 April 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  15. 1 2 Meintjes-van der Walt, Lirieka (2011). "A South African Intelligence DNA Database: panacea or panopticon?". South African Journal on Human Rights. 27 (3): 496–521. doi:10.1080/19962126.2011.11865026 . Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  16. ↑ "Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment". SabinetLaw. Retrieved 20 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  17. ↑ "Statement on the Cabinet meeting of 17 April". Government Communication and Information System. 19 April 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2013. Cabinet approved the introduction of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill to Parliament. This Bill paves the way to regulate and promote the use of DNA in combating crime, taking into account constitutional requirements. The use of DNA evidence holds the potential to alleviate blockages in the criminal justice system. Maximising the use of DNA evidence promotes fairness, confidence, and certainty in the administration of our laws.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  18. ↑ Republic of South Africa (26 April 2013). "Notice 435 of 2013" (PDF). Government Gazette (Report). 574. Pretoria. 36415. Retrieved 20 November 2013– via DNA Project.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  19. ↑ "DNA Bill Tabled in Parliament". SabinetLaw. 9 May 2013. Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  20. ↑ Presence, Chantall (31 July 2013). "Passing of DNA Bill closer". IOL . Retrieved 1 August 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  21. ↑ "Announcements, Tablings and Committee Reports – Tuesday, 12 November 2013" (PDF). Parliament of South Africa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2013. Bills passed by Houses – to be submitted to President for assent – (1) Bills passed by National Assembly on 12 November 2013: (c) Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Bill [B 9D – 2013] (National Assembly – sec 75)CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  22. ↑ Venter, Irma (30 January 2014). "DNA Act passed, mandatory DNA collection for serious crimes on the cards". Engineering News. Retrieved 31 January 2014.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  23. ↑ "Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment 2013". SabinetLaw. Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  24. ↑ Republic of South Africa (30 December 2014). "Proclamation No. 89, 2014 – Commencement of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, 2013 (Act No. 37 of 2013)" (PDF). Government Gazette (Report). 594. Pretoria. 38376 – via DNA Project. Under section 9 of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, 2013 (Act No. 37 of 2013), I hereby fix 31 January 2015 as the date on which the said Act will come into operation with the exception of section 2 (to the extent that it inserts section 36D(1) in the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977)).
  25. ↑ Hartley, Wyndham (1 August 2013). "ANC says costs can be cut for new DNA database". Business Day . Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  26. ↑ Heathfield, LJ (2014). "Policy required for entry of DNA profiles onto the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa" (PDF). South African Journal of Science . 110 (7/8): 0374. doi: 10.1590/sajs.2014/20130374 . Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  27. ↑ Williams, Denise (25 July 2013). "Clueless police top brass sent packing". The Times. Retrieved 27 November 2013. The choice of software for the envisaged system was questioned. It has yet to be decided whether the FBI's Codis or the 'home-grown' Solve would be used.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  28. ↑ Legg, Kieran (30 January 2014). "DNA Act to keep tabs on crooks". Cape Argus . Retrieved 19 February 2014.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  29. ↑ "DNA Bill robust – Phiyega". eNCA. 18 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  30. ↑ "New DNA law will make Brazil safer and save lives" (Press release). DNASaves. 29 May 2012. Retrieved 27 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  31. ↑ Radebe, Hopewell (10 July 2013). "Plan to establish national DNA database". Business Day . Retrieved 21 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  32. 1 2 Groenewald, Yolandi (18 August 2013). "Ten years later, success for driving force behind DNA bill". City Press . Archived from the original on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  33. ↑ Rose-Innes, Olivia (21 June 2011). "SA's wasted crime-fighter: DNA". Health24. Retrieved 17 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  34. 1 2 Barber, Bliss (29 November 2007). "DNA equipment donation boosts fight against crime" (PDF). Cape Times . Retrieved 17 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  35. ↑ "DNA Bill set for adoption in two weeks". SABC News Service. 5 March 2013. Archived from the original on 10 June 2013. Retrieved 17 April 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  36. ↑ "Postgraduate qualification in forensic DNA analysis". DNA Project. Retrieved 23 November 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  37. ↑ "DNA Project – South Africa: Past projects". DNA Project. Retrieved 17 March 2013.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.