National People's Congress decision on Hong Kong national security legislation

Last updated

Decision on Hong Kong national security legislation
National Emblem of the People's Republic of China (2).svg
National People's Congress
  • Decision of the National People's Congress on Establishing and Improving the Legal System and Enforcement Mechanisms for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to Safeguard National Security [1]
Territorial extentPeople's Republic of China (including Hong Kong)
Passed by National People's Congress
Passed28 May 2020 (2020-05-28)
Legislative history
Introduced by Standing Committee of the National People's Congress
Introduced21 May 2020 (2020-05-21)
Status: In force

On 30 June 2020, the NPCSC unanimously passed the Hong Kong national security law, [21] which was subsequently gazetted on the same day and officially came into force. [22]

Official text of the security law published

The details of the new legislation were kept in secret, even Hong Kong's Chief Executive Carrie Lam did not see it, [23] until the new law was published only in Chinese language [24] at 11 o'clock in the evening Beijing time on 30 June 2020. The new law in the Chinese language took effect immediately after publishing, [25] the China's State paper Xinhua also supplied text, translated in English "for reference only" [26] under title "The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region". [27] The main articles of the new law can be paraphrased as follows:

Added details about Article 43 emerged after the meeting of the Committee for Safeguarding National Security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), headed by Carrie Lam, and were published on 6 July 2020; the added details state that:

The same day, 6 July 2020, Facebook and WhatsApp said they suspended requests from Hong Kong Government about user data. [28]

Domestic responses

Protests


On 24 May 2020 a rally occurred to protest against the proposed security law. It was the biggest protest in Hong Kong since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic. [29] For the first time in two months, the police deployed tear gas in an attempt to disperse the protesters. [30]

On 27 May 2020, protesters gathered again on the streets to protest against the proposed national security law and the national anthem bill, which underwent its second reading on that day. Demonstrations of varying scale occurred in different districts including Causeway Bay, Central, and Mong Kok. Tear gas and pepper balls were fired and 360 people were arrested that day for unauthorised assembly and other charges. [31] [32]

Analysis of the change in Hong Kong protests

The Guardian 's China specialists Tania Branigan and Lily Kuo wrote that the protest movement in Hong Kong changed after the NPC announcement of the law, with the mood shifting to one where many Hong Kong protestors are willing and prepared to die for the cause of keeping Mainland Chinese influence out, and with calls to find an impactful and permanent solution to Mainland Chinese interference, rather than small-scale measures. A rare slogan, calling for complete independence rather than more control, became the unifying chant of the protests, while the concept of "laam chau" gained momentum. [33] [34] This is the ideology of taking Hong Kong down and dragging Mainland China with it. One protestor said: "If the Chinese army comes out, we will celebrate. The entire Hong Kong business environment will collapse. If they call the military here, it would ruin Hong Kong and also mainland China's economy". [35]

Crimes committed

On 1 July 2021, a Hong Kong police officer barely survived a knife attack from Leung Kin-fai, a Vitasoy purchasing agent and former information officer for Apple Daily. Leung later killed himself, and his suicide note expressed his hatred toward the police, opposition to the National Security Law, and intention to kill an officer. Some Hongkongers saw Leung as a martyr and offered flowers as tribute. The police officer underwent seven hours of surgery and was hospitalized for 19 days. [36]

Economy and stock market

Losses of about 5% were recorded in on the Hang Seng Index (the worst day since 2015 [37] ), and some Japanese stocks also fell. [38] Carrie Lam denied that the losses were due to the decision, attributing them to usual "ups and downs" in the market. [39] China has sought to assure international investors that they will not be affected. [40] Hang Seng Index regained lost ground a week later. [41]

Migration

Some Hong Kong citizens began looking for ways to emigrate and leave Hong Kong, feeling that the law would fundamentally damage their rights of expression and freedom. 10 times the usual number of web searches about emigration were recorded after the decision was announced. [42] The Taiwanese government said that they would help anyone leaving Hong Kong find passage away; China threatened "all means" against Taiwan but also said violence would be a last resort. [43]

SCMP reported that after the decision on the law, the number of Hong Kong residents speaking to estate agents about properties in the United Kingdom (UK) rose rapidly. One article compared it to the mass exodus seen before the 1997 handover, also saying that local estate agents were cutting the asking prices for Hong Kong properties to keep business. [44] Another SCMP article noted that the British announcement of BNO extension plans likely contributed to the rise in searches for UK homes specifically, with properties in London, Birmingham and Manchester being especially desirable. It quoted an estate agent who said that the demand for UK properties had, over a few days, reached where it was at its peak during the 2019 protests and before the pandemic. [45]

Immigration agencies in Hong Kong also saw a jump in inquiries, with one company seeing "a four to fivefold increase in cases", citing a new urgency, with people asking for the visa that will be approved the fastest. [44] Estate agencies report an increase in interest in Singapore for high net worth individuals, with families increasingly asking about the UK, Australia, and Canada. [46]

Statements

Supporters

Chief Executive Carrie Lam said that the Hong Kong government would fully cooperate with Beijing. [39] Andrew Leung, the President of the LegCo, and Martin Liao, pro-establishment LegCo convener, also expressed support. [47] Lam said that any national security law enacted would not affect the "legitimate rights and freedoms" of Hong Kong people, and said that its enactment by inclusion in Annex III of the Basic Law (see above) was entirely legitimate.

Paul Kwong the Archbishop and Primate of the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui (the Anglican province of Hong Kong), and Venerable Master Kuan Yun  [ zh ], the president of the Hong Kong Buddhist Association, called the decision a necessary move. [48]

Chen Daoxiang, the PLA commander in Hong Kong, said that his garrison would safeguard "national sovereignty and development interests", and that the national security law to be drafted and enacted under the decision was "conducive to deter separatist forces and external intervention". [49]

The New York Times reported that state media painted laws proposed by the decision as "necessary to protect the rule of the Communist Party" and were strongly supportive of the law. [50]

Opponents


The Hong Kong Bar Association issued a statement raising two concerns as to the nature of the law proposed by the decision. [12] [51] First, the association suggested that consultation was inadequate and that there was no guarantee that any eventual law would comply with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is "entrenched in the Basic Law". Second, the presence of mainland Chinese security organs mooted by Article 4 of the Decision did not make clear whether their agents would be required to comply with Hong Kong law, or how their deployment could be compatible with Article 22(1) of the Basic Law, which proscribes interference in affairs administered by the HKSAR 'on its own'.

On 6 June 2020, 17 out 18 District Councils unprecedentedly held a joint meeting to discuss the legislation of the national security law, with 329 out of 458 councillors attending. All 17 District Councils passed the motion to demand the withdrawal of the national security law. The convener Clarisse Yeung, who is also the chairwoman of the Wan Chai District Council, stated that the result of the meeting reflects the real public opinion in Hong Kong. [52]

Several members of the pan-democratic camp expressed concern. Lee Cheuk-yan said that the law could be used as an arbitrary "one-size-fits-all" charge against activists, citing Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo's prison sentence of 11 years for "inciting subversion". [53] Tanya Chan, the convener of pro-democratic camp, commented that the drafted decision confirmed that Hong Kong is changing from "One country, Two systems" to "One country, One system", saying that the Chinese government is intervening in Hong Kong matters in all aspects. [54] Social activist Joshua Wong said that China was trying to sever the connections of Hong Kong with the international community. [54] Jimmy Sham, convener of the Civil Human Rights Front, also attacked the law, comparing it to a "nuclear weapon". [55]

International responses

Among other responses, the United States prominently announced that it would revoke Hong Kong's special trade status on 27 May. Pompeo called the NPCSC decision the "latest in a series of actions that fundamentally undermine Hong Kong's autonomy and freedoms". [56] [57] [58]

On 19 June 2020, the European Parliament adopted a resolution condemning Beijing's unilateral introduction of the national security legislation in Hong Kong, and called for the finalization of the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Mechanism, which could be used to impose Magnitsky-style sanctions, for example assets freezing, on Chinese officials responsible for the national security legislation. [59]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One country, two systems</span> Chinese constitutional principle

"One country, two systems" is a constitutional principle of the People's Republic of China (PRC) describing the governance of the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Standing Committee of the National People's Congress</span> Permanent legislative body of China

The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) is the permanent body of the National People's Congress (NPC), the national legislature of the People's Republic of China. It exercises the powers of the NPC when it is not in session.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong Basic Law</span> Organic law of the Hong Kong SAR

The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is a national law of China that serves as the organic law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Comprising nine chapters, 160 articles and three annexes, the Basic Law was composed to implement Annex I of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.

Article 23 is an article of the Hong Kong Basic Law. It states that Hong Kong "shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronny Tong</span> Hong Kong politician

Ronny Tong Ka-wah is a senior counsel and politician in Hong Kong. He is a current non-official member of the Executive Council of Hong Kong. He co-founded the Civic Party and was a member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong, representing the New Territories East constituency from 2004 until he quit the party and resigned from the legislature on 22 June 2015, following the historic vote on Hong Kong electoral reform a few days earlier, having switched his political alignment from pro-democracy to pro-Beijing Hong Kong political group Path of Democracy, of which he is currently the convener.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tam Yiu-chung</span> Hong Kong politician

Tam Yiu-chung, GBM, JP is a pro-Beijing politician in Hong Kong. He is a former member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC), former member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo) and former chairman of the pro-Beijing Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy in Hong Kong</span>

Democratic reforms in Hong Kong did not seriously begin until 1984 and has faced significant challenges since 2014. The one country, two systems principle allows Hong Kong to enjoy high autonomy in all areas besides foreign relations and defence, which are responsibilities of the central government. Hong Kong's Basic Law allows residents to vote for local district councillors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong independence</span> Independence movement in East Asia

Hong Kong independence is the notion of Hong Kong as a sovereign state, independent from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Hong Kong is a special administrative region (SAR) of China and is thus granted a high degree of de jure autonomy, as stipulated by Article 2 of the Hong Kong Basic Law ratified under the Sino-British Joint Declaration. Since the handover of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the PRC in 1997, a growing number of Hongkongers have become concerned about what they see as Beijing's encroachment on the territory's freedoms and the failure of the Hong Kong government to deliver "genuine democracy". Advocating for Hong Kong independence became illegal after the Hong Kong national security law in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014–2015 Hong Kong electoral reform</span> Proposed electoral reform

The 2014–2015 Hong Kong electoral reform was a proposed reform for the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election and 2016 Legislative Council election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">6th Legislative Council of Hong Kong</span> 2016–2020 Legislative Council of Hong Kong

The Sixth Legislative Council of Hong Kong was the sixth meeting of the legislative branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. Running from 1 October 2016 to 31 December 2021, it was the longest legislative session in Hong Kong history, lasted for five years and three months. The term of the session was originally from 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2020, but was extended by the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) due to the postponement of the 2020 Legislative Council election.

The Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Issues Relating to the Selection of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region by Universal Suffrage and on the Method for Forming the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the Year 2016, commonly known as the 31 August Decision, is a decision made by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC), the national legislative body of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on 31 August 2014 which set limits for the 2017 Chief Executive election and 2016 Legislative Council election in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Hong Kong national security law</span> Chinas 2020 national law on national security in Hong Kong

The Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is a national law of China on Hong Kong national security passed in 2020. It is implemented in Hong Kong in accordance with Hong Kong Basic Law Article 18, which allows for China's national laws to be valid in Hong Kong if they are included in Annex III. It was formulated under the authorization of the National People's Congress decision on Hong Kong national security legislation. The law was passed on 30 June 2020 by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress as a means of resolving the anti-extradition bill protests instigated by a Hong Kong local bill proposed in 2019 to enable extradition to other territories including the mainland, and came into force the same day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests (June 2020)</span> June events of the 2019–2020 pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong

The month of June 2020 was the first anniversary of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. The decision taken by the National People's Congress on national security legislation and the alleviation of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong led to a new series of protests and international responses. On 30 June, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress passed the Hong Kong national security law which came into force the same day, leading to even more people protesting on 1 July.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Responses to the 2020 Chinese involvement with Hong Kong national security law</span>

In early May 2020, the Chinese Government announced plans to draft a new national security law for Hong Kong, something required under Hong Kong Basic Law but which should explicitly be written and enacted by Hong Kong's own government. In response to apparent mainland intent to bypass Hong Kong's local legislature, the United Kingdom – which administered Hong Kong until 1997 – announced that if a security law drafted by China was approved, Britain would open a route for all Hong Kong residents born under British rule to become British citizens. Other nations and organisations have given various responses to the decision, to legislation plans, and ultimately the law itself as passed by the Chinese Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on 28 May 2020 with 2878 votes "for", 1 vote against, and 6 blank votes. At 9:30 am, 30 June 2020, the same Standing Committee unanimously voted to enact the law. The law became effective at 11 pm on the same day.

The enactment of the Hong Kong national security law on 30 June 2020 has since caused huge changes in Hong Kong’s local education, government, culture, society, and economy. These effects are considered to be the result of the Hong Kong government’s continuing autocratization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postponement of the 2020 Hong Kong legislative election</span>

The 2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was originally scheduled on 6 September 2020 until it was postponed by the government. On 31 July 2020, Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced that she was invoking the Emergency Regulations Ordinance to postpone the election under the emergency powers granted to her by it, citing the recent resurgence of the COVID-19 cases, adding that the move was supported by Beijing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Hong Kong Legislative Council mass resignations</span>

On 11 November 2020, 15 Hong Kong pro-democracy members of the Legislative Council announced their resignations in protest against the decision of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) which bars Legislative Council members from supporting Hong Kong independence, refusing to recognise Beijing's sovereignty over Hong Kong, seeking help from "foreign countries or foreign forces to interfere in the affairs of the region" or committing "other acts that endanger national security" that resulted in the disqualification of pro-democracy legislators Alvin Yeung, Dennis Kwok, Kwok Ka-ki and Kenneth Leung. In July 2020, the four had been barred from running in the subsequently postponed Legislative Council election originally scheduled for September 2020. The resignation en masse left the Legislative Council membership dwindled to 43 out of the total number of 70 seats, with virtually no opposition for the first time since the 1997 handover.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 Hong Kong electoral changes</span> Hong Kong legislation

The 2021 Hong Kong electoral changes were initiated by the National People's Congress (NPC) on 11 March 2021 to "amend electoral rules and improve the electoral system" of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) for its Chief Executive (CE) and the Legislative Council (LegCo), in order to ensure a system in which only "patriots", according to the Chinese definition, govern Hong Kong. The reforms have been widely criticized for their negative impact on the democratic representation in the Hong Kong legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Offices (Candidacy and Taking Up Offices) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Ordinance 2021</span> Hong Kong legislation

The Public Offices Ordinance 2021 is an ordinance to amend the Oaths and Declarations Ordinance and other relating legislation which adds new requirements for the Chief Executive, Executive Council members, Legislative Council members and judges and other judicial officers, imposes oath-taking requirements on District Council members, and specifies requirements for candidates to swear to uphold the Basic Law and bear allegiance to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region when assuming office or standing for election and also adds new grounds and mechanism for disqualification from holding the office or being nominated as a candidate. The ordinance was seen as another round of the Beijing authorities to bar the opposition from standing in elections or holding public offices and also raised concerns on the bill's vague parameters of the oath with such over-reaching scope would undermine Hong Kong's judicial independence.

<i>Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration</i> Joint appeal of three cases

Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration was a joint appeal of three cases decided in 1999 by Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal (CFA). Chief Justice Andrew Li, in the Court's unanimous opinion, held that mainland-born children of Hong Kong permanent residents enjoyed the right of abode, regardless of whether one of their parents had acquired Hong Kong permanent residency at the time of birth of the children.

References

  1. 1 2 "Gazette of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China" (PDF). 15 June 2020.
  2. "Presidium elected, agenda set for China's annual legislative session". National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. 22 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  3. "China adopts decision to make Hong Kong national security laws". Xinhua News Agency. 28 May 2020. Archived from the original on 31 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  4. "Highlights of China's decision on Hong Kong national security legislation". Xinhua News Agency. 28 May 2020. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  5. Pomfret, James; Siu, Twinnie (25 May 2020). "Hong Kong and Beijing officials defend security laws, citing threat of terrorism". reuters.com . Archived from the original on 6 June 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  6. "Huge protest fills HK streets". CNN. 2 July 2003. Archived from the original on 17 February 2020. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  7. "Hong Kong leader withdraws extradition bill, sets up platform to examine protest causes". South China Morning Post. 4 September 2019. Archived from the original on 4 September 2019. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  8. Beijing loses patience and pushes ahead with Hong Kong national security law. 21 May 2020. Archived from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  9. "Full Text of the Constitution and the Basic Law – pda – chapter (2)". Government of Hong Kong. Archived from the original on 22 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  10. "Response to concerns over national security law". Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 25 May 2020.
  11. 陳, 倩婷 (24 May 2020). "港版國安法|馬恩國形容立會是政治絆腳石 料中央出手不會成常態". HK01 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  12. 1 2 "Statement of the Hong Kong Bar Association on proposal of National People's Congress to enact National Security Law in Hong Kong" (PDF). Hong Kong Bar Association. 25 May 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 May 2020. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  13. "Decision of the National People's Congress on Establishing and Completing the Hong Kong's Special Administrative Region's Legal System and Implementation Mechanisms for the Preservation of National Security". chinalawtranslate.com. 28 May 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
  14. "(两会受权发布)全国人民代表大会关于建立健全香港特别行政区维护国家安全的法律制度和执行机制的决定" [(The two sessions are authorized to issue) Decision of the National People's Congress on Establishing and Perfecting the Legal System and Enforcement Mechanism of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to Maintain National Security]. xinhuanet.com (in Chinese). 28 May 2020. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
  15. "China's legislature approves decision to enact Hong Kong national security law - CNN Video". 28 May 2020. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 30 June 2020 via edition.cnn.com.
  16. 1 2 Lee, Yen Nee (28 May 2020). "China approves controversial national security bill for Hong Kong". CNBC. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  17. "China parliament adopts plan to impose security law on Hong Kong". Yahoo! News. AFP. 28 May 2020. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  18. "《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区维护国家安全法(草案)》对四类危害国家安全的犯罪行为和刑事责任作出明确规定". Xinhua News Agency (in Chinese). 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 19 June 2020. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
  19. "Beijing reveals Hong Kong draft security as Chief Exec. to be given power to select judges – report". Hong Kong Free Press (in Chinese). 20 June 2020. Archived from the original on 3 September 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
  20. "Beijing to set up new security office in Hong Kong". BBC. 20 June 2020. Archived from the original on 20 June 2020. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  21. "人大常委會據報「全票」通過《港區國安法》 制訂過程完全黑箱無公開條文". The Stand News (in Chinese). 30 June 2020. Archived from the original on 30 June 2020. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  22. "港區國安法刊憲即時生效 國安委決定不受司法覆核 可秘密審訊". The Stand News (in Chinese). 30 June 2020. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  23. 1 2 "Hong Kong security law: Life sentences for breaking law". BBC. 30 June 2020. Archived from the original on 30 June 2020. Retrieved 30 June 2020.
  24. Tong, Elson (1 July 2020). "Explainer: 10 things to know about Hong Kong's national security law – new crimes, procedures and agencies". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 1 July 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  25. Morrison & Foerster LLP (international firm) (1 July 2020). "Hong Kong National Security Law Promulgated, Came Into Effect June 30, 2020". JD Supra. Archived from the original on 1 July 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2020. As widely reported, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (the "NPC") completed its deliberation of and formally promulgated the Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the "HKNSL" or the "Law") on June 30, 2020, and the Law was gazetted for promulgation in Hong Kong and took effect at 11 pm the same day.
  26. "English translation of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region". Xinhua. 1 July 2020. Archived from the original on 1 July 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  27. "In full: English translation of the Hong Kong national security law". Hong Kong Free Press. 1 July 2020. Archived from the original on 3 July 2020. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
  28. 1 2 Ho, Kelly (6 July 2020). "Hong Kong security law: Police handed power to do warrantless searches, freeze assets, intercept comms, control internet". Hong Kong Free Press. Retrieved 6 July 2020.
  29. "Hong Kong police fire tear gas on biggest protests since coronavirus curbs". CNBC. 24 May 2020. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  30. Lam, Eric (24 May 2020). "Hong Kong Protests Roar Back After China Tightens Grip on City". Bloomberg . Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  31. "Hong Kong's National Anthem Bill Is Sparking Renewed Protests. Here's What to Know". Time. Archived from the original on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  32. Grundy, Tom (27 May 2020). "Hong Kong police fire pepper balls at protesters and arrest 360 people for unauthorised assembly". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 27 May 2020. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  33. Tsoi, Grace (12 June 2020). "The city of two masks faces a new crisis". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020. The law is being drafted and is likely to be approved this month.
  34. Kuo, Lily; Branigan, Tania (9 June 2020). "How Hong Kong caught fire: the story of a radical uprising". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 10 June 2020. Retrieved 10 June 2020 via www.theguardian.com.
  35. Kuo, Lily; Branigan, Tania (9 June 2020). "How Hong Kong caught fire: the story of a radical uprising". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 9 June 2020. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  36. Leung, Christy (7 February 2022). "'I can't forgive him,' says Hong Kong police officer injured in knife attack". South China Morning Post.
  37. Pham, Sherisse (21 May 2020). "Hang Seng Index has worst day since 2015 as tensions flare up again between China and the West". CNN . Archived from the original on 25 May 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  38. "Japan stocks drop as Hong Kong security law raises concerns over Sino-U.S. tensions". Reuters. 22 May 2020. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  39. 1 2 "Hong Kong to 'fully cooperate' with Beijing's plan to enact security laws, leader Carrie Lam says". Hong Kong Free Press. 22 May 2020. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  40. Lockett, Hudson (25 May 2020). "Beijing seeks to reassure business over Hong Kong security law". Financial Times . Archived from the original on 25 May 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  41. Ouyang, Iris (3 June 2020). "Hong Kong stocks recover to pre-national security law sell-off levels, market rises for third day in a row". South China Morning Post . Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  42. Yu, Verna (29 May 2020). "'No cards left': Hong Kong residents sell up and search for way out as China cements grip". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
  43. Kuo, Lily (29 May 2020). "China threatens 'countermeasures' against UK over Hong Kong crisis". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 June 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2020.
  44. 1 2 Han, Albert; Lam, Ka-sing (31 May 2020). "Hongkongers renew their rush for foreign property and passports". South China Morning Post . Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
  45. Arcibal, Cheryl (4 June 2020). "UK property demand may jump as Hongkongers promised path to citizenship". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
  46. Sim, Dewey (30 May 2020). "Hong Kong national security law spurs renewed interest in Singapore property". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 4 June 2020. Retrieved 4 June 2020.
  47. "National security legislation 'in the city's interests'". China Daily. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  48. "鄺保羅、釋寬運齊撐國安法 指立法是不得已之舉 | 立場報道 | 立場新聞". 立場新聞 Stand News.
  49. Griffiths, James (26 May 2020). "China's military promises to uphold 'national sovereignty' as more Hong Kong protests expected". CNN. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
  50. Hernández, Javier C. (23 May 2020). "China Deploys Propaganda Machine to Defend Move Against Hong Kong". New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 May 2020. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  51. Lam, Jeffie (25 May 2020). "Hong Kong Bar Association questions Beijing's legal power to enact national security law, identifies 'problematic' features". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 26 May 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
  52. "【國安法】17區區議會通過動議促撤回立法 批政府架空區會". 頭條日報 (in Chinese). 6 June 2020. Archived from the original on 6 June 2020. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  53. Lam, Jeffie; Chung, Kimmy (22 May 2020). "What Beijing's national security law for Hong Kong covers, who should worry?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 May 2020. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
  54. 1 2 Wong, Rachel (22 May 2020). "'This is the end of Hong Kong': Reactions pour in as Beijing proposes security law". Hong Kong Free Press . Archived from the original on 23 May 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  55. "Outrage in HK over security law". Taipei Times . AFP. 23 May 2020. Archived from the original on 24 May 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  56. "PRC National People's Congress Proposal on Hong Kong National Security Legislation – Translations" . Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  57. "Trump targets China over Hong Kong". BBC News. 29 May 2020. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
  58. "Trump tells administration to begin process of eliminating Hong Kong privileges". Reuters. 29 May 2020. Archived from the original on 4 September 2020. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
  59. "European Parliament resolution on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy". European Parliament. Archived from the original on 16 June 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
National People's Congress decision on Hong Kong national security legislation
Simplified Chinese 全国人民代表大会关于建立健全香港特别行政区维护国家安全的法律制度和执行机制的决定
Traditional Chinese 全國人民代表大會關於建立健全香港特別行政區維護國家安全的法律制度和執行機制的決定
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin Quánguó Rénmín Dàibiǎo Dàhuì guānyú jiànlì jiànquán Xiānggǎng Tèbié Xíngzhèngqū wéihù guójiā ānquán de fǎlǜ zhìdù hé zhíxíng jīzhì de juédìng
Wade–Giles Chʻüan2-kuo2 Jên2-min2 Tai4-piao3 Ta4-hui4 kuan1-yü2 chien4-li4 chien4-chʻüan2 Hsiang1-kang2 Tʻê4-pieh2 Hsing2-cheng4-chʻü1 wei2-hu4 kuo2-chia1 an1-chʻüan2 tê fa3-lü4 chih4-tu4 ho2 chih2-hsing2 chi1-chih4 tê chüeh2-ting4
Yue: Cantonese
Jyutping cyun4 gwok3 jan4 man4 doi6 biu2 daai6 wui6*2 gwaan1 jyu1 gin3 laap6 gin6 cyun4 hoeng1 gong2 dak6 bit6 hang4 zing3 keoi1 wai4 wu6 gwok3 gaa1 on1 cyun4 dik1 faat3 leot6 zai3 dou6 wo4 zap1 hang4 gei1 zai3 dik1 kyut3 ding6