Stuttering

Last updated

Stuttering
Other namesStammering, alalia syllabaris, alalia literalis, anarthria literalis, dysphemia [1]
Specialty Speech–language pathology
Symptoms Involuntary sound repetition and disruption or blocking of speech
Usual onset2–5 years
DurationLong term
CausesNeurological and genetics
Differential diagnosis Cluttering
Treatment Speech therapy, community support
Prognosis 75-80% developmental resolves by late childhood; 15-20% of cases last into adulthood
FrequencyAbout 1%

Stuttering, also known as stammering, is a speech disorder characterized externally by involuntary repetitions and prolongations of sounds, syllables, words, or phrases as well as involuntary silent pauses called blocks in which the person who stutters is unable to produce sounds. [2] [3]

Contents

According to adults who stutter, however, stuttering is defined as a "constellation of experiences" expanding beyond the external disfluencies that are apparent to the listener. Much of the experience of stuttering is internal and encompasses experiences beyond the external speech disfluencies, which are not observable by the listener. [4]

The moment of stuttering often begins before the disfluency is produced, described as a moment of 'anticipation' - where the person who stutters knows which word they are going to stutter on. The sensation of losing control and anticipation of a stutter can lead people who stutter to react in different ways including behavioral and cognitive reactions. Some behavioral reactions can manifest outwardly and be observed as physical tension or struggle anywhere in the body. [4]

Almost 80 million people worldwide stutter, about 1% of the world's population. [5]

Stuttering is not connected to the physical production of speech sounds or putting thoughts into words. Acute nervousness and stress do not cause stuttering, but they may trigger increased stuttering in people who have the speech disorder, and living with a stigmatized disability can result in anxiety and high allostatic stress load. Neither acute nor chronic stress, however, itself creates any predisposition to stuttering.

The disorder is variable, which means that in certain situations the stuttering might be more or less noticeable, such as speaking on the phone or in large groups. People who stutter often find that their stuttering fluctuates, sometimes at random. [6]

Characteristics

Audible disfluencies

Common stuttering behaviors are observable signs of speech disfluencies, for example: repeating sounds, syllables, words or phrases, silent blocks and prolongation of sounds.

Outward physical behaviors

People who stutter may have reactions, avoidance behaviors, or secondary behaviors related to their stuttering that may look like struggle and tension in the body. These could range anywhere from tension in the head and neck, behaviors such as snapping or tapping, or facial grimacing.

Behavioral reactions

These behavioral reactions are those that might not be apparent to listeners and only be perceptible to people who stutter. Some people who stutter exhibit covert behaviors such as avoiding speaking situations, substituting words/phrases when they know they are going to stutter, or use other methods to hide their stutter. [4]

Feelings and attitudes

Stuttering could have a significant negative cognitive and affective impact on the person who stutters. Joseph Sheehan described this in terms of the analogy to an iceberg, with the immediately visible and audible symptoms of stuttering above the waterline and a broader set of symptoms such as negative emotions hidden below the surface. [7] Feelings of embarrassment, shame, frustration, fear, anger, and guilt are frequent in people who stutter, and may increase tension and effort. [8] With time, continued negative experiences may crystallize into a negative self-concept and self-image. People who stutter may project their own attitudes onto others, believing that the others think them nervous or stupid. Such negative feelings and attitudes may need to be a major focus of a treatment program. [8]

The impact of discrimination against stuttering can be severe. This may result in fears of stuttering in social situations, self-imposed isolation, anxiety, stress, shame, low self-esteem, being a possible target of bullying or discrimination, or feeling pressured to hide stuttering. In popular media, stuttering is sometimes seen as a symptom of anxiety, but there is no direct correlation in that direction. [9]

Alternatively, there are those who embrace stuttering pride and encourage other stutterers to take pride in their stutter and to find how it has been beneficial for them.

Associated conditions

Stuttering can co-occur with other disabilities. These associated disabilities include:

Causes

The cause of developmental stuttering is complex and thought to be neurological with a genetic factor. [24] [25]

A variety of hypotheses and theories suggest multiple factors contributing to stuttering. There is strong evidence that stuttering has a genetic basis. [26] Children who have first-degree relatives who stutter are three times as likely to develop a stutter. [27] In a 2010 article, three genes were found by Dennis Drayna and team to correlate with stuttering: GNPTAB, GNPTG, and NAGPA. Researchers estimated that alterations in these three genes were present in 9% of those who have a family history of stuttering. [28] [29] [30]

There is evidence that stuttering is more common in children who also have concurrent speech, language, learning or motor difficulties. For some people who stutter, congenital factors may play a role. In others, there could be added impact due to stressful situations. [26]

There is evidence for structural and functional differences in the brains of stutterers. Research is complicated by the possibility that such differences could be the consequences of stuttering rather than a cause. [31] [32] [ obsolete source ]

Other much less common causes of stuttering include neurogenic stuttering (stuttering that occurs secondary to brain damage, such as after a stroke) and psychogenic stuttering (stuttering related to a psychological condition). [33]

History of causes

Auditory processing deficits have also been proposed as a cause of stuttering. Stuttering is possibly less prevalent in deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals, [34] and stuttering is occasionally reduced when auditory feedback is altered, such as by masking, delayed auditory feedback (DAF), or frequency altered feedback. [35]

There is evidence of differences in linguistic processing between people who stutter and people who do not. [36] Brain scans of adult stutterers have found greater activation of the right hemisphere, which is associated with emotions, than of the left hemisphere, which is associated with speech. In addition, reduced activation in the left auditory cortex has been observed. [37]

The capacities and demands model has been proposed to account for the heterogeneity of the disorder. In this approach, speech performance varies depending on the capacity that the individual has for producing fluent speech, and the demands placed upon the person by the speaking situation. Demands may be increased by internal factors or inadequate language skills or external factors. In stuttering, the severity of the disorder is seen as likely to increase when demands placed on the person's speech and language system exceed their capacity to deal with these pressures. [38] However, the precise nature of the capacity or incapacity has not been delineated.

Another theory is that adults who stutter have elevated levels of the neurotransmitter dopamine, and have thus found dopamine antagonists that reduce stuttering. [24] Overactivity of the midbrain has been found at the level of the substantia nigra extended to the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus, which all contribute to the production of dopamine. [31] However, increased dopamine does not imply increased excitatory function since dopamine's effect can be both excitatory or inhibitory depending upon which dopamine receptors have been stimulated.

It was once thought that forcing a left-handed student to write with their right-hand caused stuttering due to bias against left-handed people, but this myth died out. [39] [40] [41]

Diagnosis

Some characteristics of stuttered speech are not as easy for listeners to detect. As a result, diagnosing stuttering requires the skills of a licensed speech–language pathologist (SLP). Diagnosis of stuttering employs information both from direct observation of the individual and information about the individual's background, through a case history. [42] The SLP may collect a case history on the individual through a detailed interview or conversation with the parents (if client is a child). They may also observe parent-child interactions and observe the speech patterns of the child's parents. [43] The overall goal of assessment for the SLP will be (1) to determine whether a speech disfluency exists, and (2) assess if its severity warrants concern for further treatment.

During direct observation of the client, the SLP will observe various aspects of the individual's speech behaviors. In particular, the therapist might test for factors including the types of disfluencies present (using a test such as the Disfluency Type Index (DTI)), their frequency and duration (number of iterations, percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS)), and speaking rate (syllables per minute (SPM), words per minute (WPM)). They may also test for naturalness and fluency in speaking (naturalness rating scale (NAT), test of childhood stuttering (TOCS)) and physical concomitants during speech (Riley's Stuttering Severity Instrument Fourth Edition (SSI-4)). [43] They might also employ a test to evaluate the severity of the stuttering and predictions for its course. One such test includes the stuttering prediction instrument for young children (SPI), which analyzes the child's case history, and stuttering frequency in order to determine the severity of the disfluency and its prognosis for chronicity for the future. [44]

Stuttering is a multifaceted, complex disorder that can impact an individual's life in a variety of ways. Children and adults are monitored and evaluated for evidence of possible social, psychological or emotional signs of stress related to their disorder. Some common assessments of this type measure factors including: anxiety (Endler multidimensional anxiety scales (EMAS)), attitudes (personal report of communication apprehension (PRCA)), perceptions of self (self-rating of reactions to speech situations (SSRSS)), quality of life (overall assessment of the speaker's experience of stuttering (OASES)), behaviors (older adult self-report (OASR)), and mental health (composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI)). [45]

Clinical psychologists with adequate expertise can also diagnose stuttering per the DSM-5 diagnostic codes. [46] The DSM-5 describes "Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder (Stuttering)" for developmental stuttering, and "Adult-onset Fluency Disorder". However, the specific rationale for this change from the DSM-IV is ill-documented in the APA's published literature, and is felt by some to promote confusion between the very different terms fluency and disfluency.[ citation needed ]

Normal disfluency

Preschool aged children often have difficulties with speech concerning motor planning and execution; this often manifests as disfluencies related to speech development (referred to as normal dysfluency or "other disfluencies"). [33] This type of disfluency is a normal part of speech development and temporarily present in preschool-aged children who are learning to speak. [33] [47]

Classification

Developmental stuttering is stuttering that originates when a child is learning to speak and may persist as the child matures into adulthood. Stuttering that persists after the age of seven is classified as persistent stuttering. [33]

Neurogenic stuttering (stuttering that occurs secondary to brain damage, such as after a stroke) and psychogenic stuttering (stuttering related to a psychological condition) are less common and classified separately from developmental. [33]

Developmental

Stuttering usually begins in early childhood. [37] [48] The mean onset of stuttering is 30 months. [49] With young stutterers, disfluency may be episodic, and periods of stuttering are followed by periods of relatively decreased disfluency. [50]

With time a young person who stutters might transition from easy, relaxed repetition to more tense and effortful stuttering, including blocks and prolongations. Some propose that parental reactions may affect this development. With time, secondary stuttering, including escape behaviours such as eye blinking and lip movements, may be used, as well as fear and avoidance of sounds, words, people, or speaking situations. Eventually, some become fully aware of their disorder and begin to identify themselves as stutterers. Depending on the situation, this may come with deeper frustration, embarrassment and shame. [51]

Other patterns of stuttering development have been described, including sudden onset, with the child being unable to speak, despite attempts to do so. The child usually is unable to utter the first sound of a sentence, and shows high levels of awareness and frustration. Another variety also begins suddenly with frequent word and phrase repetition, and does not include the development of secondary stuttering behaviours.

Neurogenic stuttering

Some stuttering is also believed to be caused by neurophysiology. Neurogenic stuttering typically appears following some sort of injury or disease to the central nervous system. Injuries to the brain and spinal cord, including cortex, subcortex, cerebellum, and even the neural pathway regions. [5]

Acquired stuttering

In some cases, stuttering may be acquired in adulthood as the result of a neurological event such as a head injury, tumour, stroke, or drug use. This stuttering has different characteristics from its developmental equivalent: it tends to be limited to part-word or sound repetitions, and is associated with a relative lack of anxiety and secondary stuttering behaviors. Techniques such as altered auditory feedback are not effective with the acquired type. [37] [48] [52]

Additionally, psychogenic stuttering may also arise after a traumatic experience such as a death, the breakup of a relationship or as the psychological reaction to physical trauma. Its symptoms tend to be homogeneous: the stuttering is of sudden onset and associated with a significant event, it is constant and uninfluenced by different speaking situations, and there is little awareness or concern shown by the speaker. [53]

Differential diagnosis

Other disorders with symptoms resembling stuttering, or associated disorders include autism, cluttering, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, palilalia, spasmodic dysphonia, and selective mutism.

Treatment

While there is no cure for stuttering, several treatment options exist and the best option is dependent on the individual. [54] Therapy should be individualized and tailored to the specific and unique needs of the client. The speech–language pathologist and the client typically work together to create achievable and realistic goals that target communication confidence, autonomy, managing emotions and stress related to their stutter, and working on disclosure.

Fluency shaping therapy
Fluency shaping therapy trains people who stutter to speak less disfluently by controlling their breathing, phonation, and articulation (lips, jaw, and tongue). It is based on operant conditioning techniques. [55] This type of therapy is not considered best practice in the field of speech and language pathology and is potentially harmful and traumatic for clients. [56] [57]
Stuttering modification therapy
The goal of stuttering modification therapy is not to eliminate stuttering but to modify it so that stuttering is easier and less effortful. [58] The most widely known approach was published by Charles Van Riper in 1973 and is also known as block modification therapy. [59] Stuttering modification therapy should not be used to promote fluent speech or presented as a cure for stuttering.
Avoidance Reduction Therapy for Stuttering (ARTS) is an effective form of modification therapy. It is a framework based on theories developed by professor Joseph Sheehan and his wife Vivian Sheehan. This framework focuses on self-acceptance as someone who stutters, and efficient, spontaneous and joyful communication, essentially, minimizing quality-of-life impact due to stuttering. [60]
Electronic fluency device
Altered auditory feedback effect can be produced by speaking in chorus with another person, by blocking out the voice of the person who stutters while they are talking (masking), by delaying slightly the voice of the person who stutters (delayed auditory feedback) or by altering the frequency of the feedback (frequency altered feedback). Studies of these techniques have had mixed results.
Medications
No medication is FDA-approved for stuttering. Some research suggests dopamine antagonists ecopipam and deutetrabenazine have the potential to treat stuttering. [61]

Support

Self-help groups provide people who stutter a shared forum within which they can access resources and support from others facing the same challenges of stuttering.

Prognosis

Among ages 3–5, the prognosis for spontaneously recovery is about 65% to 87.5%. By 7 years of age or within the first two years of stuttering, [33] [49] [62] and about 74% recover by their early teens. In particular, girls are shown to recover more often. [63] [64]

Prognosis is guarded with later age of onset: children who start stuttering at age 3½ years or later, [65] and/or duration of greater than 6–12 months since onset, that is, once stuttering has become established, about 18% of children who stutter after five years recover spontaneously. [66] Stuttering that persists after the age of seven is classified as persistent stuttering, and is associated with a much lower chance of recovery. [33]

Epidemiology

The lifetime prevalence, or the proportion of individuals expected to stutter at one time in their lives, is about 5–6%, [67] and overall males are affected two to five times more often than females. [68] [69] As seen in children who have just begun stuttering, there is an equivalent number of boys and girls who stutter. Still, the sex ratio appears to widen as children grow: among preschoolers, boys who stutter outnumber girls who stutter by about a two to one ratio, or less. [69] This ratio widens to three to one during first grade, and five to one during fifth grade, [70] as girls have higher recovery rates. [63] [71] the overall prevalence of stuttering is generally considered to be approximately 1%. [72]

Cross cultural

Cross-cultural studies of stuttering prevalence were very active in early and mid-20th century, particularly under the influence of the works of Wendell Johnson, who claimed that the onset of stuttering was connected to the cultural expectations and the pressure put on young children by anxious parents, which has since been debunked. Later studies found that this claim was not supported by the facts, so the influence of cultural factors in stuttering research declined. It is generally accepted by contemporary scholars that stuttering is present in every culture and in every race, although the attitude towards the actual prevalence differs. Some believe stuttering occurs in all cultures and races at similar rates, about 1% of general population (and is about 5% among young children) all around the world. [26] [48] A US-based study indicated that there were no racial or ethnic differences in the incidence of stuttering in preschool children. [73] [65]

Different regions of the world are researched unevenly. The largest number of studies has been conducted in European countries and in North America, where the experts agree on the mean estimate to be about 1% of the general population. [74] [ obsolete source ] African populations, particularly from West Africa, might have the highest stuttering prevalence in the world—reaching in some populations 5%, 6% and even over 9%. [75] Many regions of the world are not researched sufficiently, and for some major regions there are no prevalence studies at all. [76]

Bilingual stuttering

Identification

Bilingualism is the ability to speak two languages. Many bilingual people have been exposed to more than one language since birth and throughout childhood. Since language and culture are relatively fluid factors in a person's understanding and production of language, bilingualism may be a feature that impacts speech fluency. There are several ways during which stuttering may be noticed in bilingual children including the following.

  • The child is mixing vocabulary (code-mixing) from both languages in one sentence. This is a normal process that helps the child increase their skills in the weaker language, but may trigger a temporary increase in disfluency. [77]
  • The child is having difficulty finding the correct word to express ideas resulting in an increase in normal speech disfluency. [77]
  • The child is having difficulty using grammatically complex sentences in one or both languages as compared to other children of the same age. Also, the child may make grammatical mistakes. Developing proficiency in both languages may be gradual, so development may be uneven between the two languages. [77]

It was once believed that being bilingual would 'confuse' a child and cause stuttering, but research has debunked this myth. [78]

Stuttering may present differently depending on the languages the individual uses. For example, morphological and other linguistic differences between languages may make presentation of disfluency appear to be more or less depending on the individual case. [79]

History

Lewis Carroll, the well-known author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, had a stammer, as did his siblings. LewisCarrollSelfPhoto.jpg
Lewis Carroll, the well-known author of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland , had a stammer, as did his siblings.

Because of the unusual-sounding speech that is produced and the behaviors and attitudes that accompany a stutter, it has long been a subject of scientific interest and speculation as well as discrimination and ridicule. People who stutter can be traced back centuries to Demosthenes, who tried to control his disfluency by speaking with pebbles in his mouth. [80] The Talmud interprets Bible passages to indicate that Moses also stuttered, and that placing a burning coal in his mouth had caused him to be "slow and hesitant of speech" (Exodus 4, v.10). [80]

Galen's humoral theories were influential in Europe in the Middle Ages for centuries afterward. In this theory, stuttering was attributed to an imbalance of the four bodily humors—yellow bile, blood, black bile, and phlegm. Hieronymus Mercurialis, writing in the sixteenth century, proposed to redress the imbalance by changes in diet, reduced libido (in men only), and purging. Believing that fear aggravated stuttering, he suggested techniques to overcome this. Humoral manipulation continued to be a dominant treatment for stuttering until the eighteenth century. [81] Partly due to a perceived lack of intelligence because of his stutter, the man who became the Roman emperor Claudius was initially shunned from the public eye and excluded from public office. [80]

In and around eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe, surgical interventions for stuttering were recommended, including cutting the tongue with scissors, removing a triangular wedge from the posterior tongue, and cutting nerves, or neck and lip muscles. Others recommended shortening the uvula or removing the tonsils. All were abandoned due to the danger of bleeding to death and their failure to stop stuttering. Less drastically, Jean Marc Gaspard Itard placed a small forked golden plate under the tongue in order to support "weak" muscles. [80]

Notker Balbulus, from a medieval manuscript Notker Balbulus 2.jpg
Notker Balbulus, from a medieval manuscript

Italian pathologist Giovanni Morgagni attributed stuttering to deviations in the hyoid bone, a conclusion he came to via autopsy. [81] Blessed Notker of St. Gall (c.840 – 912), called Balbulus ("The Stutterer") and described by his biographer as being "delicate of body but not of mind, stuttering of tongue but not of intellect, pushing boldly forward in things Divine," was invoked against stammering. [82]

A royal Briton who stammered was King George VI. He went through years of speech therapy, most successfully under Australian speech therapist Lionel Logue, for his stammer. The Academy Award-winning film The King's Speech (2010) in which Colin Firth plays George VI, tells his story. The film is based on an original screenplay by David Seidler, who also stuttered until age 16.

Another British case was that of Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Churchill claimed, perhaps not directly discussing himself, that "[s]ometimes a slight and not unpleasing stammer or impediment has been of some assistance in securing the attention of the audience ..." [83] However, those who knew Churchill and commented on his stutter believed that it was or had been a significant problem for him. [84] His secretary Phyllis Moir commented that "Winston Churchill was born and grew up with a stutter" in her 1941 book I was Winston Churchill's Private Secretary. She related one example, "'It's s-s-simply s-s-splendid,' he stuttered—as he always did when excited." Louis J. Alber, who helped to arrange a lecture tour of the United States, wrote in Volume 55 of The American Mercury (1942) that "Churchill struggled to express his feelings but his stutter caught him in the throat and his face turned purple" and that "born with a stutter and a lisp, both caused in large measure by a defect in his palate, Churchill was at first seriously hampered in his public speaking. It is characteristic of the man's perseverance that, despite his staggering handicap, he made himself one of the greatest orators of our time."

For centuries "cures" such as consistently drinking water from a snail shell for the rest of one's life, "hitting a stutterer in the face when the weather is cloudy", strengthening the tongue as a muscle, and various herbal remedies were tried. [85] Similarly, in the past people subscribed to odd theories about the causes of stuttering, such as tickling an infant too much, eating improperly during breastfeeding, allowing an infant to look in the mirror, cutting a child's hair before the child spoke his or her first words, having too small a tongue, or the "work of the devil". [85]

Society, culture, and community

Stuttering community

Many counties have regular events and activities to get people who stutter together in mutual support. These events take place at regional, national, and international level. At a regional level, there are often stuttering support or chapter groups that look to provide a place for people who stutter in the local area to meet, discuss and learn from each other. [86] [87]

At a national level, stuttering charities or groups host conferences. Conferences can vary in their focus and scope, some focus on the latest research developments, some on stuttering and the arts and others still look to provide a space for stutterers simply to come together.

There are two different international meetings of stutterers. The International Stuttering Association World Congress is primarily focused on people who stutter. There is also Joint World Congress on Stuttering and Cluttering that brings together academics, researchers, speech-language pathologists, people who stutter, and people who clutter for a focus more on research, viewpoints, and treatments for stuttering.

Historic advocacy and self-help

Self-help and advocacy organisations for people who stammer have reportedly been in existence since the 1920s. In 1921, a Philadelphia-based attorney who stammered, J. Stanley Smith, established the Kingsley Club.  [88] Designed to support people with a stammer in the Philadelphia area, the club took inspiration for its name from Charles Kingsley. Kingsley, a nineteenth-century English social reformer and author of Westward Ho! and The Water Babies, had a stammer himself. [89]   

Whilst Kingsley himself did not appear to recommend self-help or advocacy groups for people who stammer, the Kingsley Club promoted a positive mental attitude to support its members in becoming confident speakers, in a similar way discussed by Charles Kingsley in Irrationale of Speech.

Other support groups for people who stammer began to emerge in the first half of the twentieth century. In 1935 a Stammerer's Club was established in Melbourne, Australia, by a Mr H. Collin of Thornbury. [90]  At the time of its formation it had 68 members. The club was formed in response to the tragic case of a man from Sydney who "sought relief from the effects of stammering in suicide". As well as providing self-help, this club adopted an advocacy role with the intention of appealing to the Government to provide special education and to fund research into the causes of stammering. [91] [92]

Disability rights movement

Some people who stutter, and are part of the disability rights movement, have begun to embrace their stuttering voices as an important part of their identity. [93] [94] In July 2015 the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) announced the launch of the Defence Stammering Network to support and champion the interests of British military personnel and MOD civil servants who stammer and to raise awareness of the condition. [95]

Stuttering pride

The Stuttering Pride flag symbolises the waves of stuttering pride rippling through the community. Stuttering Pride Flag.png
The Stuttering Pride flag symbolises the waves of stuttering pride rippling through the community.

Stuttering pride (or stuttering advocacy) is a social movement repositioning stuttering as a valuable and respectable way of speaking. The movement seeks to counter the societal narratives in which temporal and societal expectations dictate how communication takes place. [96] In this sense, the stuttering pride movement challenges the pervasive societal narrative of stuttering as a defect and instead positions stuttering as a valuable and respectable way of speaking in its own right. The movement encourages stutterers to take pride in their unique speech patterns and in what stuttering can tell us about the world. It also advocates for societal adjustments to allow stutterers equal access to education and employment opportunities, and addresses how this may impact stuttering therapy. [96]

Associations

See also

Notes

  1. GREENE JS (1937-07-01). "Dysphemia and Dysphonia: Cardinal Features of Three Types of Functional Syndrome: Stuttering, Aphonia and Falsetto (Male)". Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 26 (1). American Medical Association (AMA): 74–82. doi:10.1001/archotol.1937.00650020080011. ISSN   0886-4470.
  2. World Health Organization ICD-10 F95.8 – Stuttering Archived 2014-11-02 at the Wayback Machine .
  3. "Stuttering".
  4. 1 2 3 Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS (2019-12-18). "Stuttering as Defined by Adults Who Stutter". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 62 (12): 4356–4369. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00137. ISSN   1092-4388. PMID   31830837. S2CID   209340288.
  5. 1 2 [Carlson, N. (2013). Human Communication. In Physiology of behavior (11th ed., pp. 497–500). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.]
  6. Bowen C. "Information for Families: Stuttering- What can be done about it?". speech-language-therapy dot com. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved June 19, 2013.
  7. Kalinowski & Saltuklaroglu 2006 , p. 17
  8. 1 2 Guitar 2005 , pp. 16–7
  9. Constantino CD, Campbell P, Simpson S (March–April 2022). "Stuttering and the social model". Journal of Communication Disorders. 96: 106200. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106200. ISSN   0021-9924. PMID   35248920. S2CID   247096437.
  10. Sroubek A, Kelly M, Li X (2013-02-01). "Inattentiveness in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder". Neuroscience Bulletin. 29 (1): 103–110. doi:10.1007/s12264-012-1295-6. ISSN   1995-8218. PMC   4440572 . PMID   23299717.
  11. Druker K, Hennessey N, Mazzucchelli T, Beilby J (2019-03-01). "Elevated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children who stutter". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 59: 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.11.002. ISSN   0094-730X. PMID   30477807. S2CID   53733731.
  12. Donaher J, Richels C (2012-12-01). "Traits of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children who stutter". Journal of Fluency Disorders. Special Issue: 9th Oxford Dysfluency Conference. 37 (4): 242–252. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.08.002. ISSN   0094-730X. PMID   23218208.
  13. Arndt Jennifer, Healey E. Charles (2001-04-01). "Concomitant Disorders in School-Age Children Who Stutter". Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 32 (2): 68–78. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/006). PMID   27764357.
  14. Riley Jeanna, Riley Johnetta G. (2000-10-01). "A Revised Component Model for diagnosing and Treating Children Who Stutter". Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. 27 (Fall): 188–199. doi:10.1044/cicsd_27_F_188.
  15. Peterson RL, Pennington BF (May 2012). "Developmental dyslexia". The Lancet. 379 (9830): 1997–2007. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60198-6. ISSN   0140-6736. PMC   3465717 . PMID   22513218.
  16. Blood GW, Ridenour VJ, Qualls CD, Hammer CS (November 2003). "Co-occurring disorders in children who stutter". Journal of Communication Disorders. 36 (6): 427–448. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00023-6. PMID   12967738.
  17. Arndt J, Healey EC (April 2001). "Concomitant Disorders in School-Age Children Who Stutter". Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 32 (2): 68–78. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2001/006). ISSN   0161-1461. PMID   27764357.
  18. Elsherif MM, Wheeldon LR, Frisson S (2021-03-01). "Do dyslexia and stuttering share a processing deficit?". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 67: 105827. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105827. ISSN   0094-730X. PMID   33444937. S2CID   231611179.
  19. 1 2 3 Briley PM, Ellis C (2018-12-10). "The Coexistence of Disabling Conditions in Children Who Stutter: Evidence From the National Health Interview Survey". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 61 (12): 2895–2905. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0378. ISSN   1092-4388. PMID   30458520. S2CID   53946065.
  20. Healey, E. C., Reid, R., & Donaher, J. (2005). Treatment of the child who stutters with co-existing learning, behavioral, and cognitive challenges. In R. Lees & C. Stark (Eds.), The treatment of stuttering in the young school-aged child (pp. 178–196). Whurr Publishers.
  21. Ntourou K, Conture EG, Lipsey MW (August 2011). "Language Abilities of Children Who Stutter: A Meta-Analytical Review". American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 20 (3): 163–179. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0102). ISSN   1058-0360. PMC   3738062 . PMID   21478281.
  22. Iverach L, Rapee RM (June 2014). "Social anxiety disorder and stuttering: Current status and future directions". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 40: 69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.08.003 . PMID   24929468.
  23. St Louis KO, Hinzman AR (October 1988). "A descriptive study of speech, language, and hearing characteristics of school-aged stutterers". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 13 (5): 331–355. doi:10.1016/0094-730X(88)90003-4.
  24. 1 2 Bloodstein O, Ratner NB (2007). A handbook on stuttering. Cengage Learning. p. 142. ISBN   978-1-4180-4203-5.
  25. "NIH study in mice identifies type of brain cell involved in stuttering". NIDCD. 2019-08-16. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
  26. 1 2 3 Guitar 2005 , pp. 5–6
  27. Ward 2006 , p. 11
  28. Kang C, Riazuddin S, Mundorff J, Krasnewich D, Friedman P, Mullikin JC, Drayna D (2010-02-25). "Mutations in the Lysosomal Enzyme–Targeting Pathway and Persistent Stuttering". New England Journal of Medicine. 362 (8): 677–685. doi:10.1056/nejmoa0902630. ISSN   0028-4793. PMC   2936507 . PMID   20147709.
  29. "Genetic Mutations Linked to Stuttering". Children.webmd.com. February 10, 2010. Archived from the original on November 12, 2012. Retrieved August 13, 2012.
  30. West R, Nelson S, Berry M (1939). "The heredity of stuttering". Quarterly Journal of Speech. 25 (1): 23–30. doi:10.1080/00335633909380434.
  31. 1 2 Watkins KE, Smith SM, Davis S, Howell P (January 2008). "Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering". Brain. 131 (Pt 1): 50–9. doi:10.1093/brain/awm241. PMC   2492392 . PMID   17928317.
  32. Soo-Eun, Chang (2007). "Brain anatomy differences in childhood stuttering". NeuroImage .
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sander RW, Osborne CA (1 November 2019). "Stuttering: Understanding and Treating a Common Disability". American Family Physician. 100 (9): 556–560. PMID   31674746.
  34. Ward 2006 , pp. 46–7
  35. Ward 2006 , p. 58
  36. Ward 2006 , p. 43
  37. 1 2 3 Gordon, N. (2002). "Stuttering: incidence and causes". Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 44 (4): 278–81. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2002.tb00806.x. PMID   11995897.
  38. Ward 2006 , pp. 16–21
  39. Lewis R (May 1949). "The psychological approach to the preschool stutterer". Can Med Assoc J. 60 (5): 497–500. PMC   1591462 . PMID   18125462.
  40. Bryngelson B, Clark TB (1933). "LEFT-HANDEDNESS AND STUTTERING" (PDF). The Journal of Heredity. 24 (10): 387–390. Retrieved January 3, 2011.[ dead link ]
  41. Johnson, W., L. Duke (1935). "Changes in handedness associated with onset or disappearance of stuttering; sixteen cases". Journal of Experimental Education. 4: 112–132. doi:10.1080/00220973.1935.11010003.
  42. "Stuttering". NIDCD. 2015-08-18. Archived from the original on 2018-05-20. Retrieved 2020-01-29.
  43. 1 2 http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/158/#s4International Archived 2013-11-10 at the Wayback Machine Fibiger S. 2009. Stuttering. In: JH Stone, M Blouin, editors. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation.
  44. Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation Archived 2013-11-10 at the Wayback Machine
  45. "Trobe University School of Human Communication Disorders".
  46. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
  47. Ambrose, Nicoline Grinager, and Ehud Yairi. "Normative Disfluency Data for Early Childhood Stuttering." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, no. 4 (1999): 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4204.895 ("Stuttering is shown to be qualitatively as well as quantitatively different from normal disfluency even at the earliest stages of stuttering.")
  48. 1 2 3 Craig, A., Tran, Y. (2005). "The epidemiology of stuttering: The need for reliable estimates of prevalence and anxiety levels over the lifespan". Advances in Speech Language Pathology. 7 (1): 41–46. doi:10.1080/14417040500055060. S2CID   71565512.
  49. 1 2 Yairi, E., Ambrose, N. (1992). "Onset of stuttering in preschool children: selected factors". Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 35 (4): 782–8. doi:10.1044/jshr.3504.782. PMID   1405533.
  50. Ward 2006 , pp. 114–5
  51. Ward 2006 , pp. 115–116
  52. Ward 2006 , pp. 4, 332–335
  53. Ward 2006 , pp. 4, 332, 335–337
  54. Yaruss JS (Feb 2003). "One size does not fit all: special topics in stuttering therapy". Semin Speech Lang. 24 (24): 3–6. doi:10.1055/s-2003-37381. PMID   12601580. S2CID   8582797.
  55. Ward 2006 , p. 257
  56. Sisskin V (2023-01-17). "Disfluency-Affirming Therapy for Young People Who Stutter: Unpacking Ableism in the Therapy Room". Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 54 (1): 114–119. doi:10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00015. ISSN   0161-1461. PMID   36279203. S2CID   253096977.
  57. Tichenor SE, Constantino C, Yaruss JS (2022-02-09). "A Point of View About Fluency". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 65 (2): 645–652. doi:10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00342. ISSN   1092-4388. PMC   9135003 . PMID   34982943.
  58. Ward 2006 , p. 253
  59. Ward 2006 , p. 245
  60. "Graphique 1.3 Avantages sanitaires de la lutte contre le changement climatique" (XLSX). doi:10.1787/888932428576 . Retrieved 2024-02-07.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  61. Maguire GA, Nguyen DL, Simonson KC, Kurz TL (2020). "The Pharmacologic Treatment of Stuttering and Its Neuropharmacologic Basis". Front Neurosci. 14: 158. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00158 . PMC   7118465 . PMID   32292321.
  62. Yairi, E. (1993). "Epidemiologic and other considerations in treatment efficacy research with preschool-age children who stutter". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 18 (2–3): 197–220. doi:10.1016/0094-730X(93)90007-Q.
  63. 1 2 Ward 2006 , p. 16
  64. Yairi, E (Fall 2005). "On the Gender Factor in Stuttering". Stuttering Foundation of America Newsletter: 5.
  65. 1 2 Yairi, E., Ambrose, N. (2005). "Early childhood stuttering". Pro-Ed.
  66. Andrews, G., Craig, A., Feyer, A. M., Hoddinott, S., Howie, P., Neilson, M. (1983). "Stuttering: a review of research findings and theories circa 1982". The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 48 (3): 226–46. doi:10.1044/jshd.4803.226. PMID   6353066.
  67. Mansson, H. (2000). "Childhood stuttering: Incidence and development". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 25 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1016/S0094-730X(99)00023-6.
  68. Yairi, E, Ambrose, N, Cox, N (1996). "Genetics of stuttering: a critical review". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 39 (4): 771–784. doi:10.1044/jshr.3904.771. PMID   8844557.
  69. 1 2 Kloth, S, Janssen, P, Kraaimaat, F, Brutten, G (1995). "Speech-motor and linguistic skills of young people who stutter prior to onset". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 20 (2): 157–70. doi:10.1016/0094-730X(94)00022-L. hdl: 2066/21168 . S2CID   146130424.
  70. Guitar 2005 , p. 22
  71. Yairi, E., Ambrose, N. G. (1999). "Early childhood stuttering I: persistency and recovery rates". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 42 (5): 1097–112. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4205.1097. PMID   10515508.
  72. Craig, A., Hancock, K., Tran, Y.; Craig, M., Peters, K. (2002). "Epidemiology of stuttering in the community across the entire life span". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 45 (6): 1097–105. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/088). PMID   12546480.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  73. Proctor, A., Duff, M., Yairi, E. (2002). "Early childhood stuttering: African Americans and European Americans". ASHA Leader. 4 (15): 102.
  74. Bloodstein O (1995). A Handbook on Stuttering. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group.
  75. Nwokah, E (1988). "The imbalance of stuttering behavior in bilingual speakers". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 13 (5): 357–373. doi:10.1016/0094-730X(88)90004-6.
  76. Sheree Reese, Joseph Jordania (2001). "Stuttering in the Chinese population in some Southeast Asian countries: A preliminary investigation on attitude and incidence". "Stuttering Awareness Day"; Minnesota State University, Mankato. Archived from the original on 2011-06-06.
  77. 1 2 3 "Stuttering and the Bilingual Child". Stuttering Foundation: A Nonprofit Organization Helping Those Who Stutter. 6 May 2011. Archived from the original on 2017-09-26. Retrieved 2017-12-18.
  78. Kornisch M (2020-12-03). "Bilinguals who stutter: A cognitive perspective". Journal of Fluency Disorders. 67. doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105819. PMID   33296800. S2CID   228089017.
  79. Howell P, Borsel JV (2011). Multilingual Aspects of Fluency Disorders. Multilingual Matters. ISBN   978-1-84769-358-7.
  80. 1 2 3 4 Brosch, S, Pirsig, W. (2001). "Stuttering in history and culture". Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 59 (2): 81–7. doi:10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00474-8. PMID   11378182.
  81. 1 2 Rieber, RW, Wollock, J (1977). "The historical roots of the theory and therapy of stuttering". Journal of Communication Disorders. 10 (1–2): 3–24. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(77)90009-0. PMID   325028.
  82. Townsend A (December 1928). "The Christmas Sequence". Dominicana . 13 (4). Washington, D.C.: 281 via Archive.org.
  83. "Churchill: A Study in Oratory". The Churchill Centre. Archived from the original on 2005-04-19. Retrieved 2005-04-05.
  84. "Churchill Stutter". Archived from the original on 2012-01-13. Retrieved 2012-01-28.
  85. 1 2 Kuster, Judith Maginnis (2005-04-01). "Folk Myths About Stuttering". Minnesota State University. Archived from the original on 2005-04-19. Retrieved 2005-04-03.
  86. "Stammering Groups | STAMMA". stamma.org. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  87. "Local NSA Chapters | Stuttering Support Groups". National Stuttering Association. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  88. Thurber J (1930-04-25). "Stammerers' Club". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X . Retrieved 2023-08-01.
  89. "Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country, 1830–1882", Perceptions of the Press in Nineteenth-Century British Periodicals, Anthem Press, pp. 261–299, 2012-02-01, doi:10.7135/upo9781843317562.019, ISBN   978-1-84331-756-2 , retrieved 2023-08-01
  90. "STAMMERERS' CLUB". Sydney Morning Herald. 1935-05-23. Retrieved 2023-08-01.
  91. "THE STAMMERERS' CLUB OF QUEENSLAND". Cairns Post. 1936-10-10.
  92. Bermuda Reporter
  93. "Did I Stutter?". Did I Stutter?. Archived from the original on 2015-10-06. Retrieved 2015-10-05.
  94. "How To Stutter More". stuttermore.tumblr.com. Archived from the original on 2015-10-29. Retrieved 2015-10-05.
  95. "Defence Stammering Network launched". Archived from the original on 2015-08-25. Retrieved 2015-07-25.
  96. 1 2 Stammering pride and prejudice : difference not defect. Patrick Campbell, Christopher Constantino, Sam Simpson. [Albury]. 2019. ISBN   978-1-907826-36-8. OCLC   1121135480.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)

Further reading

Listen to this article
(3 parts, 52 minutes)
Sound-icon.svg
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated 16 January 2006 (2006-01-16), and do not reflect subsequent edits.

* Rockey, D., Speech Disorder in Nineteenth Century Britain: The History of Stuttering, Croom Helm, (London), 1980. ISBN   0-85664-809-4

Related Research Articles

A communication disorder is any disorder that affects an individual's ability to comprehend, detect, or apply language and speech to engage in dialogue effectively with others. This also encompasses deficiencies in verbal and non-verbal communication styles. The delays and disorders can range from simple sound substitution to the inability to understand or use one's native language. This article covers subjects such as diagnosis, the DSM-IV, the DSM-V, and examples like sensory impairments, aphasia, learning disabilities, and speech disorders.

Speech disorders, impairments, or impediments, are a type of communication disorder in which normal speech is disrupted. This can mean fluency disorders like stuttering, cluttering or lisps. Someone who is unable to speak due to a speech disorder is considered mute. Speech skills are vital to social relationships and learning, and delays or disorders that relate to developing these skills can impact individuals function. For many children and adolescents, this can present as issues with academics. Speech disorders affect roughly 11.5% of the US population, and 5% of the primary school population. Speech is a complex process that requires precise timing, nerve and muscle control, and as a result is susceptible to impairments. A person who has a stroke, an accident or birth defect may have speech and language problems.

A speech disfluency, also spelled speech dysfluency, is any of various breaks, irregularities, or non-lexical vocables which occur within the flow of otherwise fluent speech. These include "false starts", i.e. words and sentences that are cut off mid-utterance; phrases that are restarted or repeated, and repeated syllables; "fillers", i.e. grunts, and non-lexical or semiarticulate utterances such as huh, uh, erm, um, and hmm, and, in English, well, so, I mean, and like; and "repaired" utterances, i.e. instances of speakers correcting their own slips of the tongue or mispronunciations. Huh is claimed to be a universal syllable.

Cluttering is a speech and communication disorder characterized by a rapid rate of speech, erratic rhythm, and poor syntax or grammar, making speech difficult to understand.

Specific language impairment (SLI) is diagnosed when a child's language does not develop normally and the difficulties cannot be accounted for by generally slow development, physical abnormality of the speech apparatus, autism spectrum disorder, apraxia, acquired brain damage or hearing loss. Twin studies have shown that it is under genetic influence. Although language impairment can result from a single-gene mutation, this is unusual. More commonly SLI results from the combined influence of multiple genetic variants, each of which is found in the general population, as well as environmental influences.

Language development in humans is a process which starts early in life. Infants start without knowing a language, yet by 10 months, babies can distinguish speech sounds and engage in babbling. Some research has shown that the earliest learning begins in utero when the fetus starts to recognize the sounds and speech patterns of its mother's voice and differentiate them from other sounds after birth.

Formulaic language is a linguistic term for verbal expressions that are fixed in form, often non-literal in meaning with attitudinal nuances, and closely related to communicative-pragmatic context. Along with idioms, expletives, and proverbs, formulaic language includes pause fillers and conversational speech formulas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speech–language pathology</span> Disability therapy profession

Speech–language pathology (a.k.a. speech and language pathology or logopedics) is a healthcare and academic discipline concerning the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of communication disorders, including expressive and mixed receptive-expressive language disorders, voice disorders, speech sound disorders, speech disfluency, pragmatic language impairments, and social communication difficulties, as well as swallowing disorders across the lifespan. It is an allied health profession regulated by professional bodies including the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and Speech Pathology Australia. The field of speech-language pathology is practiced by a clinician known as a speech-language pathologist (SLP) or a speech and language therapist (SLT). SLPs also play an important role in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), often in collaboration with pediatricians and psychologists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muteness</span> Medical condition

In human development, muteness or mutism is defined as an absence of speech, with or without an ability to hear the speech of others. Mutism is typically understood as a person's inability to speak, and commonly observed by their family members, caregivers, teachers, doctors or speech and language pathologists. It may not be a permanent condition, as muteness can be caused or manifest due to several different phenomena, such as physiological injury, illness, medical side effects, psychological trauma, developmental disorders, or neurological disorders. A specific physical disability or communication disorder can be more easily diagnosed. Loss of previously normal speech (aphasia) can be due to accidents, disease, or surgical complication; it is rarely for psychological reasons.

Punishment is any change in a human or animal's surroundings which, occurring after a given behavior or response, reduces the likelihood of that behavior occurring again in the future. Reinforcement, referring to any behavior that increases the likelihood that a response will occurs, plays a large role in punishment. Motivating operations (MO) can be categorized in abolishing operations, decrease the effectiveness of the stimuli and establishing, increase the effectiveness of the stimuli. For example, a painful stimulus which would act as a punisher for most people may actually reinforce some behaviors of masochistic individuals.

Delayed Auditory Feedback (DAF), also called delayed sidetone, is a type of altered auditory feedback that consists of extending the time between speech and auditory perception. It can consist of a device that enables a user to speak into a microphone and then hear their voice in headphones a fraction of a second later. Some DAF devices are hardware; DAF computer software is also available. Most delays that produce a noticeable effect are between 50–200 milliseconds (ms). DAF usage has been shown to induce mental stress.

The Monster Study was a non-consensual experiment performed on 22 orphan children in Davenport, Iowa in 1939 about stuttering. It was conducted by Wendell Johnson, University of Iowa, with the physical experiment being performed by his graduate student Mary Tudor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electronic fluency device</span> Devices intended to improve the fluency of persons who stutter

Electronic fluency devices are electronic devices intended to improve the fluency of persons who stutter. Most electronic fluency devices change the sound of the user's voice in his or her ear.

Fluency refers to continuity, smoothness, rate, and effort in speech production. It is also used to characterize language production, language ability or language proficiency.

Stuttering therapy is any of the various treatment methods that attempt to either reduce stuttering to some degree in an individual or cope with negative impacts of living with a stutter or social stigma. Stuttering can be seen as a challenge to treat because there is a lack of consensus about therapy, and there is no cure for stuttering.

Speech and language impairment are basic categories that might be drawn in issues of communication involve hearing, speech, language, and fluency.

Auditory feedback (AF) is an aid used by humans to control speech production and singing by helping the individual verify whether the current production of speech or singing is in accordance with his acoustic-auditory intention. This process is possible through what is known as the auditory feedback loop, a three-part cycle that allows individuals to first speak, then listen to what they have said, and lastly, correct it when necessary. From the viewpoint of movement sciences and neurosciences, the acoustic-auditory speech signal can be interpreted as the result of movements of speech articulators. Auditory feedback can hence be inferred as a feedback mechanism controlling skilled actions in the same way that visual feedback controls limb movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Verbal intelligence</span> The ability to understand concepts in words

Verbal intelligence is the ability to understand and reason using concepts framed in words. More broadly, it is linked to problem solving, abstract reasoning, and working memory. Verbal intelligence is one of the most g-loaded abilities.

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is identified when a child has problems with language development that continue into school age and beyond. The language problems have a significant impact on everyday social interactions or educational progress, and occur in the absence of autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability or a known biomedical condition. The most obvious problems are difficulties in using words and sentences to express meanings, but for many children, understanding of language is also a challenge. This may not be evident unless the child is given a formal assessment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stuttering pride</span> Social movement

Stuttering pride is a social movement that repositions stuttering as a valuable and respectable way of speaking. The stuttering pride movement challenges the pervasive societal narrative of stuttering as a defect, repositioning stuttering as a form of vocal and linguistic diversity that enriches our language, ideas, and art forms.