This article needs additional citations for verification .(July 2024) |
In linguistics and etymology, suppletion is traditionally understood as the use of one word as the inflected form of another word when the two words are not cognate. For those learning a language, suppletive forms will be seen as "irregular" or even "highly irregular". For example, go:went is a suppletive paradigm, because go and went are not etymologically related, whereas mouse:mice is irregular but not suppletive, since the two words come from the same Old English ancestor.
The term "suppletion" implies that a gap in the paradigm was filled by a form "supplied" by a different paradigm. Instances of suppletion are overwhelmingly restricted to the most commonly used lexical items in a language.
An irregular paradigm is one in which the derived forms of a word cannot be deduced by simple rules from the base form. For example, someone who knows only a little English can deduce that the plural of girl is girls but cannot deduce that the plural of man is men. Language learners are often most aware of irregular verbs, but any part of speech with inflections can be irregular.
For most synchronic purposes—first-language acquisition studies, psycholinguistics, language-teaching theory—it suffices to note that these forms are irregular. However, historical linguistics seeks to explain how they came to be so and distinguishes different kinds of irregularity according to their origins.
Most irregular paradigms (like man:men) can be explained by phonological developments that affected one form of a word but not another (in this case, Germanic umlaut). In such cases, the historical antecedents of the current forms once constituted a regular paradigm.
Historical linguistics uses the term "suppletion" [1] to distinguish irregularities like person:people or cow:cattle that cannot be so explained because the parts of the paradigm have not evolved out of a single form.
Hermann Osthoff coined the term "suppletion" in German in an 1899 study of the phenomenon in Indo-European languages. [2] [3] [4]
Suppletion exists in many languages around the world. [5] These languages are from various language families: Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Semitic, Romance, etc.
For example, in Georgian, the paradigm for the verb "to come" is composed of four different roots (di-, -val-, -vid-, and -sul-; მი-, -ვალ-, -ვიდ-, -სულ-). [6]
Similarly, in Modern Standard Arabic, the verb jāʾ ('come') usually uses the form taʿāl for its imperative, and the plural of marʾah ('woman') is nisāʾ.
Some of the more archaic Indo-European languages are particularly known for suppletion. Ancient Greek, for example, has some twenty verbs with suppletive paradigms, many with three separate roots.
In English, the past tense of the verb go is went, which comes from the past tense of the verb wend, archaic in this sense. (The modern past tense of wend is wended.) See Go (verb) .
The Romance languages have a variety of suppletive forms in conjugating the verb "to go", as these first-person singular forms illustrate (second-person singular forms in imperative): [7]
Language | Imperative | Present | Subjunctive | Future | Preterite | Infinitive | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
French | va, vas-y | 1 | vais | 1 | aille | 4 | irai | 2 | allai | 4 | aller | 4 |
Romansh (Sursilvan) | va | 1 | mon | 6 | mondi | 6 | — | — | ir | 2 | ||
Sardinian (Logudorese) | bai | 1 | ando | 3 | andaia, andaio | 3 | — | — | andare | 3 | ||
Italian | vai, va, va' | 1 | vado, vo | 1 | vada | 1 | andrò | 3 | andai | 3 | andare | 3 |
Occitan (Languedocien) | vai | 1 | vau | 1 | ane | 3 | anarai | 3 | anèri | 3 | anar | 3 |
Catalan | vès | 1 | vaig | 1 | vagi | 1 | aniré | 3 | aní | 3 | anar | 3 |
Spanish | vetú | 1 | voy | 1 | vaya | 1 | iré | 2 | fui | 5 | ir | 2 |
andá vos | 3 | |||||||||||
Portuguese | vaitu | 1 | vou | 1 | vá | 1 | irei | 2 | fui | 5 | ir | 2 |
ide vós | 2 | |||||||||||
The sources of these forms, numbered in the table, are six different Latin verbs:
Many of the Romance languages use forms from different verbs in the present tense; for example, French has je vais ‘I go’ from vadere, but nous allons ‘we go’ from ambulare. Galician-Portuguese has a similar example: imos from ire ‘to go’ and vamos from vadere ‘we go’; the former is somewhat disused in modern Portuguese but very alive in modern Galician. Even ides, from itis second-person plural of ire, is the only form for ‘you (plural) go’ both in Galician and Portuguese (Spanish vais, from vadere).
Sometimes, the conjugations differ between dialects. For instance, the Limba Sarda Comuna standard of Sardinian supported a fully regular conjugation of andare, but other dialects like Logudorese do not (see also Sardinian conjugation). In Romansh, Rumantsch Grischun substitutes present and subjunctive forms of ir with vom and giaja (both are from Latin vādere and īre, respectively) in the place of mon and mondi in Sursilvan.
Similarly, the Welsh verb mynd ‘to go’ has a variety of suppletive forms such as af ‘I shall go’ and euthum ‘we went’. Irish téigh ‘to go’ also has suppletive forms: dul ‘going’ and rachaidh ‘will go’.
In Estonian, the inflected forms of the verb minema ‘to go’ were originally those of a verb cognate with the Finnish lähteä ‘to leave’, except for the passive and infinitive.
In Germanic, Romance (except Romanian), Celtic, Slavic (except Bulgarian and Macedonian), and Indo-Iranian languages, the comparative and superlative of the adjective "good" is suppletive; in many of these languages the adjective "bad" is also suppletive.
Language | Adjective | Etymology | Comparative | Superlative | Etymology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germanic languages | |||||
English | good | Proto-Germanic: *gōdaz [12]
| better | best | Proto-Germanic: *batizô [12]
cognate to Sanskrit : bhadra "fortunate" |
Danish | god | bedre | bedst | ||
German | gut | besser | besten | ||
Faroese | góður | betri | bestur | ||
Icelandic | góður | betri | bestur | ||
Dutch | goed | beter | best | ||
Norwegian Bokmål | god | bedre | best | ||
Norwegian Nynorsk | god | betre | best | ||
Swedish | god | bättre | bäst | ||
Romance languages | |||||
French | bon | Latin : bonus from Old Latin: duenos
| meilleur |
| |
Portuguese | bom | melhor | |||
Spanish | bueno | mejor | |||
Catalan | bo | millor | |||
Italian | buono | migliore | |||
Celtic languages | |||||
Scottish Gaelic | math | Proto-Celtic: *matis from Proto-Indo-European: *meh₂- "ripen", "mature" | feàrr | Proto-Celtic *werros from Proto-Indo-European: *wers- "peak" | |
Irish | maith | fearr | |||
Breton | mat | gwell, gwelloc'h (1) | gwellañ (1) |
| |
Welsh | da | Proto-Celtic: *dagos "good", "well" | gwell (1) | gorau (2) | |
Slavic languages | |||||
Polish | dobry | Proto-Slavic: *dobrъ | lepszy | najlepszy | Proto-Indo-European *lep-, *lēp- "behoof", "boot", "good" |
Czech | dobrý | lepší | nejlepší | ||
Slovak | dobrý | lepší | najlepší | ||
Ukrainian | добрий | ліпший | найліпший | ||
Serbo-Croatian | dobar | bolji | najbolji | Proto-Slavic: *bolьjь "bigger" | |
Slovene | dober | boljši | najboljši | ||
Russian | хороший, khoroshiy | probably from Proto-Slavic: *xorb [13] | лучше, luchshe | (наи)лучший, (nai)luchshiy | Old Russian лучии, neut. луче Old Church Slavonic: лоучии "more suitable, appropriate" [13] |
Indo-Iranian languages | |||||
Persian | خوب, khūb[xʊb] [a] | probably cognate of Proto-Slavic *xorb (above). Not a satisfactory etymology for beh; but see comparative and superlative forms in comparison to Germanic | خوبتر, xūb-tar or بِهْتَر, beh-tar [b] | خوبترین, xūb-tarīn or بِهْتَرين, beh-tarīn | From Proto-Indo-Iranian *Hwásuš "good". Not a cognate of the Germanic forms above. |
Non-Indo-European languages | |||||
Georgian | კარგი, k'argi [kʼaɾgi]. | possibly an Iranian borrowing via Old Armenian կարգ (karg, “order”). | უკეთესი, uk'etesi [uk'e̞tʰe̞si]. | საუკეთესო, sauk'eteso [sauk'e̞tʰe̞so̞]. | From Proto-Georgian-Zan *ḳet- “to add, mix”. |
The comparison of "good" is also suppletive in Estonian : hea → parem → parim and Finnish : hyvä → parempi → paras.
Language | Adjective | Etymology | Comparative | Superlative | Etymology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Germanic languages | |||||
English | bad | Uncertain, possibly from OE bæddel ("effeminate man, hermaphrodite, pederast")[ dubious – discuss ][ citation needed ], related to OE bædan ("to defile") < Proto-Germanic *baidijaną ("constrain, cause to stay") In OE yfel was more common, compare Proto-Germanic *ubilaz, Gothic ubils (bad), German übel (evil / bad) Eng evil | worse | worst | From Proto-Germanic *wirsizô, *wirsistaz. |
Old Norse | vándr | From Proto-Germanic *wanh-. | verri | verstr | |
Icelandic | vondur | verri | verstur | ||
Faroese | óndur | verri | verstur | ||
Norwegian Bokmål | ond, vond | verre | verst(e) | ||
Norwegian Nynorsk | vond | verre | verst(e) | ||
Swedish | ond | värre | värst | ||
Danish | ond | værre | værst | ||
Romance languages | |||||
French | mal [a] | Latin : malus | pire | Latin : peior, cognate to Sanskrit padyate "he falls" | |
Portuguese | mau | pior | |||
Spanish | malo | peor | |||
Catalan | mal [b] | pitjor | |||
Italian | male [a] | peggiore | |||
Celtic languages | |||||
Scottish Gaelic | droch | Proto-Celtic *drukos ("bad") < (possibly) PIE *dʰrewgʰ- ("to deceive") | miosa | Proto-Celtic *missos < PIE *mey- ("to change") | |
Irish | droch | measa | |||
Welsh | drwg | gwaeth | gwaethaf | Proto-Celtic *waxtisamos ("worst") | |
Slavic languages | |||||
Polish | zły | Proto-Slavic *zel | gorszy | najgorszy | compare Polish gorszyć (to disgust, scandalise) |
Czech | zlý (špatný) | horší | nejhorší | ||
Slovak | zlý | horší | najhorší | ||
Ukrainian | archaic злий | гірший | найгірший | ||
Serbo-Croatian | zao | gori | najgori | ||
Russian | плохой (plokhoy) | probably Proto-Slavic *polx [13] | хуже (khuzhe) | (наи)худший ((nai)khudshiy) | Old Church Slavonic хоудъ, Proto-Slavic *хudъ ("bad", "small") [13] |
Similarly to the Italian noted above, the English adverb form of "good" is the unrelated word "well", from Old English wel, cognate to wyllan "to wish".
Celtic languages:
Language | Adjective | Comparative / superlative |
---|---|---|
Irish | beag (Old Irish bec < Proto-Celtic *bikkos) | níos lú / is lú (< Old Irish laigiu < Proto-Celtic *lagyūs < PIE *h₁lengʷʰ- ("lightweight")) |
Welsh | bach (< Brythonic *bɨx < Proto-Celtic *bikkos) | llai / lleiaf (< PIE *h₁lengʷʰ- (“lightweight”)) |
Language | Adjective | Comparative / superlative |
---|---|---|
Irish | mór (< Proto-Celtic *māros < PIE *moh₁ros) | níos mó / is mó < Proto-Celtic *māyos < PIE *meh₁-) |
Welsh | mawr (< Proto-Celtic *māros < PIE *moh₁ros) | mwy / mwyaf < Proto-Celtic *māyos < PIE *meh₁-) |
In many Slavic languages, great and small are suppletive:
Language | Adjective | Comparative / superlative |
---|---|---|
Polish | mały | mniejszy / najmniejszy |
Czech | malý | menší / nejmenší |
Slovak | malý | menší / najmenší |
Slovene | majhen | manjši / najmanjši |
Ukrainian | малий, маленький | менший / найменший |
Russian | маленький (malen'kiy) | меньший / наименьший (men'she / naimen'shiy) |
Language | Adjective | Comparative / superlative |
---|---|---|
Polish | duży | większy / największy |
Czech | velký | větší / největší |
Slovak | veľký | väčší / najväčší |
Slovene | velik | večji / največji |
Ukrainian | великий | більший / найбільший |
In Albanian there are 14 irregular verbs divided into suppletive and non-suppletive:
Verb | Meaning | Present | Preterite | Imperfect |
---|---|---|---|---|
qenë | to be | jam | qeshë | isha |
pasur | to have | kam | pata | kisha |
ngrënë | to eat | ha | hëngra | haja |
ardhur | to come | vij | erdha | vija |
dhënë | to give | jap | dhashë | jepja |
parë | to see | shoh | pashë | shihja |
rënë | to fall, strike | bie | rashë | bija |
prurë | to bring | bie | prura | bija |
ndenjur | to stay | rri | ndenja | rrija |
Ancient Greek had a large number of suppletive verbs. A few examples, listed by principal parts:
In Bulgarian, the word човек, chovek ("man", "human being") is suppletive. The strict plural form, човеци, chovetsi, is used only in Biblical context. In modern usage it has been replaced by the Greek loan хора, khora. The counter form (the special form for masculine nouns, used after numerals) is suppletive as well: души, dushi (with the accent on the first syllable). For example, двама, трима души, dvama, trima dushi ("two, three people"); this form has no singular either. (A related but different noun is the plural души, dushi, singular душа, dusha ("soul"), both with accent on the last syllable.)
In English, the complicated irregular verb to be has forms from several different roots:
This verb is suppletive in most Indo-European languages, as well as in some non-Indo-European languages such as Finnish.
An incomplete suppletion exists in English with the plural of person (from the Latin persona). The regular plural persons occurs mainly in legalistic use. More commonly, the singular of the unrelated noun people (from Latin populus) is used as the plural; for example, "two people were living on a one-person salary" (note the plural verb). In its original sense of "populace, ethnic group", people is itself a singular noun with regular plural peoples.
Several irregular Irish verbs are suppletive:
There are several suppletive comparative and superlative forms in Irish; in addition to the ones listed above, there is:
In modern Japanese, the copulae だ, である and です take な to create "attributive forms" of adjectival nouns [18] (hence the English moniker, "na-adjectives"):
Irrealis 未然形 | Adverbial 連用形 | Conclusive 終止形 | Attributive 連体形 | Hypothetical 仮定形 | Imperative 命令形 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
だろ -daro | だっ -daQ で -de に -ni | だ -da | な -na | なら -nara |
The "conclusive" and "attributive" forms, だ and な, were constructed similarly, from a combination of a particle and an inflection form of the old verb あり (ari, "to exist").
(Note: で itself was also a contraction of earlier にて. [21] )
In modern Japanese, である ("conclusive") simply retains the older appearance of だ, while です is a different verb that can be used as a suppleted form of だ. Multiple hypotheses have been proposed for the etymology of です, one of which is a contraction of であります: [22]
The basic construction of the negative form of a Japanese verb is the "irrealis" form followed by ない, which would result in such hypothetical constructions as *だらない and *であらない. However, these constructions are not used in modern Japanese, and the construction ではない is used instead. [23] This is because *あらない, the hypothetically regular negative form of ある, is not used either, and is simply replaced with ない.
While the auxiliary ない causes suppletion, other auxiliaries such as ん and ありません do not necessarily.
For です, its historical "irrealis" form, でせ has not been attested to create a negative form (only でせう → でしょう has been attested, and there were and are no *でせん and *でせない). [24] Thus, it has to borrow でありません as its negative form instead. [23]
To express a potential meaning, as in "can do", most verbs use the "irrealis" form followed by れる or られる. する, notably has no such construction, and has to use a different verb for this meaning, できる.
Latin has several suppletive verbs. A few examples, listed by principal parts:
In some Slavic languages, a few verbs have imperfective and perfective forms arising from different roots. For example, in Polish:
Verb | Imperfective | Perfective |
---|---|---|
to take | brać | wziąć |
to say | mówić | powiedzieć |
to see | widzieć | zobaczyć |
to watch | oglądać | obejrzeć |
to put | kłaść | położyć |
to find | znajdować | znaleźć |
to go in/to go out (on foot) | wchodzić, wychodzić | wejść, wyjść |
to ride in/to ride out (by car) | wjeżdżać, wyjeżdżać | wjechać, wyjechać |
Note that z—, przy—, w—, and wy— are prefixes and are not part of the root
In Polish, the plural form of rok ("year") is lata which comes from the plural of lato ("summer"). A similar suppletion occurs in Russian : год, romanized: god ("year") > лет, let (genitive of "years").
The Romanian verb a fi ("to be") is suppletive and irregular, with the infinitive coming from Latin fieri, but conjugated forms from forms of already suppletive Latin sum. For example, eu sunt ("I am"), tu ești ("you are"), eu am fost ("I have been"), eu eram ("I used to be"), eu fusei/fui ("I was"); while the subjunctive, also used to form the future in o să fiu ("I will be/am going to be"), is linked to the infinitive.
In Russian, the word человек, chelovek ("man, human being") is suppletive. The strict plural form, человеки, cheloveki, is used only in Orthodox Church contexts, with numerals (e. g. пять человек, pyat chelovek "five people") and in humorous context. It may have originally been the unattested *человекы, *cheloveky. In any case, in modern usage, it has been replaced by люди, lyudi, the singular form of which is known in Russian only as a component of compound words (such as простолюдин, prostolyudin). This suppletion also exists in Polish (człowiek > ludzie), Czech (člověk > lidé), Serbo-Croatian (čovjek > ljudi), [25] Slovene (človek > ljudje), and Macedonian (човек (čovek) > луѓе (lugje)).
Strictly speaking, suppletion occurs when different inflections of a lexeme (i.e., with the same lexical category) have etymologically unrelated stems. The term is also used in looser senses, albeit less formally.
The term "suppletion" is also used in the looser sense when there is a semantic link between words but not an etymological one; unlike the strict inflectional sense, these may be in different lexical categories, such as noun/verb. [26] [27]
English noun/adjective pairs such as father/paternal or cow/bovine are also referred to as collateral adjectives. In this sense of the term, father/fatherly is non-suppletive. Fatherly is derived from father, while father/paternal is suppletive. Likewise cow/cowish is non-suppletive, while cow/bovine is suppletive.
In these cases, father/pater- and cow/bov- are cognate via Proto-Indo-European, but 'paternal' and 'bovine' are borrowings into English (via Old French and Latin). The pairs are distantly etymologically related, but the words are not from a single Modern English stem.
The term "weak suppletion" is sometimes used in contemporary synchronic morphology in reference to sets of stems whose alternations cannot be accounted for by synchronically productive phonological rules. For example, the two forms child/children are etymologically from the same source, but the alternation does not reflect any regular morphological process in modern English: this makes the pair appear to be suppletive, even though the forms go back to the same root.
In that understanding, English has abundant examples of weak suppletion in its verbal inflection: e.g. bring/brought, take/took, see/saw, etc. Even though the forms are etymologically related in each pair, no productive morphological rule can derive one form from the other in synchrony. Alternations just have to be learned by speakers — in much the same way as truly suppletive pairs such as go/went.
Such cases, which were traditionally simply labelled "irregular", are sometimes described with the term "weak suppletion", so as to restrict the term "suppletion" to etymologically unrelated stems.
In linguistics, the Indo-European ablaut is a system of apophony in the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE).
In the Germanic languages, weak verbs are by far the largest group of verbs, and are therefore often regarded as the norm. They are distinguished from the Germanic strong verbs by the fact that their past tense form is marked by an inflection containing a, , or sound rather than by changing the verb's root vowel.
In Indo-European studies, a thematic vowel or theme vowel is the vowel *e or *o from ablaut placed before the ending of a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) word. Nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the Indo-European languages with this vowel are thematic, and those without it are athematic. Used more generally, a thematic vowel is any vowel found at the end of the stem of a word.
Proto-Germanic is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages.
The Germanic language family is one of the language groups that resulted from the breakup of Proto-Indo-European (PIE). It in turn divided into North, West and East Germanic groups, and ultimately produced a large group of mediaeval and modern languages, most importantly: Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish (North); English, Dutch and German (West); and Gothic.
The verb go is an irregular verb in the English language. It has a wide range of uses; its basic meaning is "to move from one place to another". Apart from the copular verb be, the verb go is the only English verb to have a suppletive past tense, namely went.
In linguistics, a word stem is a part of a word responsible for its lexical meaning. Typically, a stem remains unmodified during inflection with few exceptions due to apophony
A feature common to all Indo-European languages is the presence of a verb corresponding to the English verb to be.
This article deals with Japanese equivalents of English adjectives.
In linguistics, a suffix is an affix which is placed after the stem of a word. Common examples are case endings, which indicate the grammatical case of nouns and adjectives, and verb endings, which form the conjugation of verbs. Suffixes can carry grammatical information or lexical information . Inflection changes the grammatical properties of a word within its syntactic category. Derivational suffixes fall into two categories: class-changing derivation and class-maintaining derivation.
Proto-Indo-European nominals include nouns, adjectives, and pronouns. Their grammatical forms and meanings have been reconstructed by modern linguists, based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages. This article discusses nouns and adjectives; Proto-Indo-European pronouns are treated elsewhere.
Araki is a nearly extinct language spoken in the small island of Araki, south of Espiritu Santo Island in Vanuatu. Araki is gradually being replaced by Tangoa, a language from a neighbouring island.
Early Middle Japanese is a stage of the Japanese language between 794 and 1185, which is known as the Heian period (平安時代). The successor to Old Japanese (上代日本語), it is also known as Late Old Japanese. However, the term "Early Middle Japanese" is preferred, as it is closer to Late Middle Japanese than to Old Japanese.
In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, while the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, etc. can be called declension.
Old Norse has three categories of verbs and two categories of nouns. Conjugation and declension are carried out by a mix of inflection and two nonconcatenative morphological processes: umlaut, a backness-based alteration to the root vowel; and ablaut, a replacement of the root vowel, in verbs.
The Proto-Italic language is the ancestor of the Italic languages, most notably Latin and its descendants, the Romance languages. It is not directly attested in writing, but has been reconstructed to some degree through the comparative method. Proto-Italic descended from the earlier Proto-Indo-European language.
Historical linguistics has made tentative postulations about and multiple varyingly different reconstructions of Proto-Germanic grammar, as inherited from Proto-Indo-European grammar. All reconstructed forms are marked with an asterisk (*).
Japanese verb conjugation is very regular, as is usual for an agglutinative language, but there are a number of exceptions. The best-known irregular verbs are the common verbs する suru "do" and 来る kuru "come", sometimes categorized as the two Group 3 verbs. As these are the only verbs frequently flagged as significantly irregular, they are sometimes misunderstood to be the only irregular verbs in Japanese. However, there are about a dozen irregular verbs in Japanese, depending on how one counts. The other irregular verbs encountered at the beginning level are ある aru "be (inanimate)" and 行く iku/yuku "go", with the copula behaving similarly to an irregular verb.
Proto-Slavic is the unattested, reconstructed proto-language of all Slavic languages. It represents Slavic speech approximately from the 2nd millennium BC through the 6th century AD. As with most other proto-languages, no attested writings have been found; scholars have reconstructed the language by applying the comparative method to all the attested Slavic languages and by taking into account other Indo-European languages.
A regular verb is any verb whose conjugation follows the typical pattern, or one of the typical patterns, of the language to which it belongs. A verb whose conjugation follows a different pattern is called an irregular verb. This is one instance of the distinction between regular and irregular inflection, which can also apply to other word classes, such as nouns and adjectives.