WNP-1 and WNP-4

Last updated
WNP-1/4
WNP-1 -4.jpg
WNP-1/4 site in 2009, with WNP-1 to the south and WNP-4 to the north. The turbine building extends northeast of the containment, and the auxiliary building extends south of the containment. [1]
WNP-1 and WNP-4
Official nameNuclear Project Nos. 1 and 4
CountryUnited States
LocationNorth of Richland, Benton County, Washington
Coordinates 46°28′17″N119°19′01″W / 46.4715°N 119.3170°W / 46.4715; -119.3170
StatusCancelled
Construction began1975
Commission date N/A
Owner(s) Washington Public Power Supply System
Nuclear power station
Reactor type PWR
Reactor supplier Babcock & Wilcox
Power generation
Units cancelled1 × 1259 MW
1 × 1250 MW
External links
Commons Related media on Commons
[ edit on Wikidata]

Washington Nuclear Project Nos. 1 and 4, abbreviated as WNP-1 and WNP-4 were two of the five nuclear power plants on which construction was started by the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) in order to meet projected electricity demand in the Pacific Northwest. WNP-1, WNP-2 and WNP-3 were part of the original 1968 plan, with WNP-4 (a twin to WNP-1 and located at the same site) and WNP-5 (a twin to WNP-3, in similar fashion) added in the early 1970s. [2]

Contents

WNP-1 and -4 are located on 972 acres (393 ha), within the boundaries of the Hanford Reservation in the U.S. state of Washington, approximately 1.5 miles (2.4 km) east of the Columbia Generating Station. The WNP-1 site has been selected as a location for small modular reactors: Washington Xe-100 reactor site. [3] [4]

History

The Site Certification Agreement was approved in 1975, with construction commencing on both units later that year. [5] Labor disputes at Hanford halted construction on WNP-1, -2 and -4 in 1980 and the forecast electric demand had failed to materialize, prompting WPPSS to install new management and re-evaluate the cost and schedule for all five nuclear projects. [6] In 1982, the Bonneville Power Administration, which had encouraged and was responsible for funding the construction of the initial three projects, had to decide between shutting down construction on WNP-1 or WNP-3. Construction continued on WNP-3 since WNP-3 was partly owned by public utilities and was slightly ahead of schedule, and WNP-1 entered an extended construction delay in April 1982 when it was approximately 63% complete. [6]

Equipment and structures at WNP-1 were preserved to enable the resumption of construction at a later date, based on regional energy forecasts showing surplus power generation would disappear by 1990, [7] but preservation was terminated in 1995. [6] However, the low humidity has maintained the structures in a reasonable condition. [3] The co-owners of WNP-4 and WNP-5 planned to fund similar preservation measures for a potential construction restart, but could not agree on funding obligations, and WNP-4 was canceled in January 1982 at approximately 24% complete. [6]

With the shutdown of the nearby N-Reactor in 1987, a Department of Energy proposal to complete and convert WNP-1 to a tritium-producing reactor for the production of nuclear weapons materials was advanced. Senator Brock Adams and Representative Sid Morrison commissioned reports [8] [9] detailing the issues involved. Public reaction to the conversion proposal was mostly negative. [10] WPPSS advanced a separate proposal to convert both WNP-1 and WNP-2 to dispose of highly enriched uranium and plutonium by using it as mixed-oxide fuel. [11]

WPPSS's successor, Energy Northwest, submitted a revised site restoration plan in 1999 proposing several different alternative levels of restoration, ranging from putting a fence around the incomplete units to full demolition of all structures. [12] Under EFSEC Resolution No. 302, [13] a revised 'Level 3D' restoration is acceptable, which retains major structures such as the containment, turbine pedestal and auxiliary building. The final agreed-upon restoration adopts a two-phase site restoration, which retains major structures and utility infrastructure for potential reuse in the near-term. [5] The containment building at WNP-1 is slated to be retained, but the containment at WNP-4 will be demolished to approximately 25 feet above grade and sealed with a concrete cap in the long term. [12]

In 2001, regional electricity shortages led to Energy Northwest's withdrawal of a request to terminate the construction permit for WNP-1. [14] Instead, Energy Northwest commissioned a series of studies regarding the feasibility of restarting construction on WNP-1 and in 2002, the NRC extended construction permit CPPR-134 for WNP-1 to 2011, pending study results. [15] These studies included one by Bechtel for a cost- and time-to-complete analysis, another study by R. W. Beck to independently assess Bechtel's methodology, a study by the Energy Northwest senior management team, and an industrial/political feasibility study by the lobbying group Goldschmidt-Imeson, which was founded by former Oregon governor Neil Goldschmidt. [16] The studies concluded that restarting construction on WNP-1 was technically feasible but not cost-effective, with cost of completion estimated at US$4,200,000,000(equivalent to $6,941,300,000 in 2022). [17] [18] [19] As a result, Energy Northwest requested termination of the construction license, which was received on February 8, 2007. [20] [21]

TVA revived its terminated construction license [22] [23] for two similar partially completed units at the Bellefonte Nuclear Generating Station and decided to proceed with staffing and long lead item ordering for completion of Unit 1. [24] [25] TVA then sold the site on November 14, 2016, to Nuclear Development LLC which planned to complete both units for about $13 billion starting in 2018 although the sale was cancelled by TVA on November 30, 2018. Nuclear Development, LLC filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court seeking to force TVA to complete the sale. The lawsuit was finally decided in favor of TVA which withdrew its construction permits in September 2021. [26] Even so, this potential restart of a similar power plant indicated that it may be feasible to revive the construction license and complete WNP-1 if desired and needed.

In late 2020 the federal government awarded two $80 million initial fundings to build the TerraPower and X-energy reactors at sites 4 and 1 respectively within the next 5 to 7 years. [27] In 2021 Terrapower instead announced that its first Natrium reactor would be built in Wyoming. [28] In 2023 X-energy announced continued development of up to 12 reactors at the Hanford site. [29]

Design

The pressurized water reactor nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) for WNP-1 and -4 was being manufactured by Babcock & Wilcox. The B&W 205 design was ordered for WNP-1 and -4 as well as for the two units at Bellefonte Nuclear Generating Station and Mülheim-Kärlich Nuclear Plant  [ de ], but only Mülheim-Kärlich was completed. Elements of the design are similar to earlier B&W NSSSes installed at Davis Besse, ANO-1, Crystal River 3, Three Mile Island, Oconee and Rancho Seco.

WNP-1/4 would have received make-up water from the adjacent Columbia River and was equipped with forced-draft low-profile cooling towers and a spray pond. [3]

Skagit/Hanford

WNP-1/4 and WNP-2 (now Columbia Generating Station) should not be confused with the proposed Skagit/Hanford plant. Skagit/Hanford was a proposal advanced by a consortium of utilities led by Puget Sound Power & Light (40% share) and joined by Portland General Electric (30%), Pacific Light and Power (20%) and Washington Water Power (10%) to build a two-unit plant north of Seattle in the Skagit Valley. The Skagit site was directly above a major earthquake fault. After the Three Mile Island accident in 1979, Skagit County voters forced the consortium to relocate the proposed Skagit plant to the Hanford site. [30] Skagit/Hanford had not progressed beyond the initial engineering design phases before the plant was scuttled. A 1978 Battelle Northwest report stated the Hanford site could support twenty or more nuclear reactors. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanford Site</span> Defunct American nuclear production site

The Hanford Site is a decommissioned nuclear production complex operated by the United States federal government on the Columbia River in Benton County in the U.S. state of Washington. It has also been known as Site W and the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Established in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project, the site was home to the Hanford Engineer Works and B Reactor, the first full-scale plutonium production reactor in the world. Plutonium manufactured at the site was used in the first atomic bomb, which was tested in the Trinity nuclear test, and in the Fat Man bomb used in the bombing of Nagasaki.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tennessee Valley Authority</span> American utility company

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally owned electric utility corporation in the United States. TVA's service area covers all of Tennessee, portions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, and small areas of Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. While owned by the federal government, TVA receives no taxpayer funding and operates similarly to a private for-profit company. It is headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, and is the sixth-largest power supplier and largest public utility in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant</span> Nuclear power plant located on Tennessee River, Alabama

The Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant is located on the Tennessee River near Decatur and Athens, Alabama, on the north side of Wheeler Lake. The site has three General Electric boiling water reactor (BWR) nuclear generating units and is owned entirely by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). With a generating capacity of nearly 3.8 gigawatts, it is the third most powerful nuclear power plant in the United States, behind the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant in Arizona and the Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia, and the most powerful generating station operated by TVA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sequoyah Nuclear Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Hamilton County, Tennessee

The Sequoyah Nuclear Plant is a nuclear power plant located on 525 acres (212 ha) located 7 miles (11 km) east of Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee, and 20 miles (32 km) north of Chattanooga, abutting Chickamauga Lake, on the Tennessee River. The facility is owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Watts Bar Nuclear Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Rhea County, Tennessee

The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant is a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) nuclear reactor pair used for electric power generation. It is located on a 1,770-acre (7.2 km²) site in Rhea County, Tennessee, near Spring City, between the cities of Chattanooga and Knoxville. Watts Bar supplies enough electricity for about 1,200,000 households in the Tennessee Valley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bellefonte Nuclear Plant</span> Unfinished nuclear power plant located in Hollywood, Alabama

The Bellefonte Nuclear Generating Station (BLN) is an unfinished nuclear power plant in Hollywood, Alabama, United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Columbia Generating Station</span> Nuclear energy facility in Washington, US

Columbia Generating Station is a nuclear commercial energy facility located on the Hanford Site, 10 miles (16 km) north of Richland, Washington. It is owned and operated by Energy Northwest, a Washington state, not-for-profit joint operating agency. Licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 1983, Columbia first produced electricity in May 1984, and entered commercial operation in December 1984.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">B Reactor</span> Nuclear reactor in Washington, United States

The B Reactor at the Hanford Site, near Richland, Washington, was the first large-scale nuclear reactor ever built. The project was a key part of the Manhattan Project, the United States nuclear weapons development program during World War II. Its purpose was to convert natural uranium metal into plutonium-239 by neutron activation, as plutonium is simpler to chemically separate from spent fuel assemblies, for use in nuclear weapons, than it is to isotopically enrich uranium into weapon-grade material. The B reactor was fueled with metallic natural uranium, graphite moderated, and water-cooled. It has been designated a U.S. National Historic Landmark since August 19, 2008 and in July 2011 the National Park Service recommended that the B Reactor be included in the Manhattan Project National Historical Park commemorating the Manhattan Project. Visitors can take a tour of the reactor by advance reservation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shippingport Atomic Power Station</span> Atomic electricity plant in the US

The Shippingport Atomic Power Station was the world's first full-scale atomic electric power plant devoted exclusively to peacetime uses. It was located near the present-day Beaver Valley Nuclear Generating Station on the Ohio River in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, United States, about 25 miles (40 km) from Pittsburgh.

The "Nuclear Power 2010 Program" was launched in 2002 by President George W. Bush in 2002, 13 months after the beginning of his presidency, in order to restart orders for nuclear power reactors in the U.S. by providing subsidies for a handful of Generation III+ demonstration plants. The expectation was that these plants would come online by 2010, but it was not met.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">N-Reactor</span>

The N-Reactor was a water/graphite-moderated nuclear reactor constructed during the Cold War and operated by the U.S. government at the Hanford Site in Washington; it began production in 1963.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in the United States</span> Power source providing US electricity

In the United States, nuclear power is provided by 92 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 94.7 gigawatts (GW), with 61 pressurized water reactors and 31 boiling water reactors. In 2019, they produced a total of 809.41 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for 20% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2018, nuclear comprised nearly 50 percent of US emission-free energy generation.

Energy Northwest is a public power joint operating agency in the northwest United States, formed 66 years ago in 1957 by Washington state law to produce at-cost power for Northwest utilities. Headquartered in the Tri-Cities at Richland, Washington, the WPPSS became commonly known as "Whoops!", due to over-commitment to nuclear power in the 1970s which brought about financial collapse and the second largest municipal bond default in U.S. history. WPPSS was renamed Energy Northwest in November 1998, and agency membership includes 28 public power utilities, including 23 of the state's 29 public utility districts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WNP-3 and WNP-5</span>

Washington Nuclear Project Nos. 3 and 5, abbreviated as WNP-3 and WNP-5 were two of the five nuclear power plants on which construction was started by the Washington Public Power Supply System in order to meet projected electricity demand in the Pacific Northwest. WNP-1, WNP-2 and WNP-3 were part of the original 1968 plan, with WNP-4 and WNP-5 added in the early 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant</span> Canceled nuclear power plant in Mississippi, US

The Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant is a canceled nuclear power plant project near Iuka, Mississippi. It was originally planned to have two 1,350-MW (output) reactors operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The steam turbine-generator sets were provided by General Electric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant</span> Uncompleted nuclear power plant in Hawkins County, Tennessee

Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant was a planned nuclear power generation facility that was to be constructed and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) in unincorporated Hawkins County, Tennessee. Proposed to house two reactor units, the power plant was estimated to cost $1.6 billion when it was first planned in late 1977, provide a generating capacity of 2,600,000 kilowatts. Following negative public reactions towards nuclear energy following the Three Mile Island accident and a decreasing demand for power due to regional economic decline, the TVA's board of directors voted to defer further construction of the power plant. By 1981, the plant was 40% complete and an estimated $1.5 billion in planning, engineering, and construction costs had accumulated. Construction never resumed, and the project was canceled overall in 1982 due to lower load growth than forecast. By the project's cancellation, the TVA had amassed over $2.6 billion in spending for the incomplete nuclear facility. After being auctioned off by the TVA in 1987, the land acquired for the plant would be under the ownership of Hawkins County's industrial development board, who converted most of the site into an industrial park. A 1 MW solar farm was built at the site in 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Ferguson (physicist)</span> Nuclear physicist (1932–2022)

Robert Louis (Bob) Ferguson was a nuclear-trained physicist and a 60-year veteran in the field of nuclear energy. He was best known for being appointed the first Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Programs for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by the first Energy Secretary, James Schlesinger, serving from 1978 to 1980 during President Jimmy Carter's administration.

A number of Xe-100 small modular reactors designed by X-energy will be installed for nuclear electric power production near the Columbia Generating Station in Washington, by the 2030s. It will be X-energy's second power plant after one in Texas due to be finished by 2030. The operator will be Energy Northwest, the operator of Columbia Generating Station, the only nuclear power station in the Pacific Northwest as of 2023.

References

  1. ↑ General Plant Description: Chapter 1.0 — B&W Cross-Training Course R-326C (PDF) (Report). United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2011. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  2. ↑ Goodman, Louis J.; Ignacio, Rufino S. (1999). "7: The Washington Public Power Supply System: Nuclear Power Plants 1968–1992". Engineering Project Management: The IPQMS Method and Case Histories. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 123–140. ISBN   0-8493-0024-X . Retrieved 29 August 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 URS Corporation (September 2014). Hanford Small Modular Reactor Study (PDF) (Report). Tri-City Development Council (TRIDEC). Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  4. ↑ Don Gregoire; Milton Gorden (c. 2022). "Subsurface Investigation Approach – Xe-100 Project on Former WNP-1 Site" (PDF). Energy Northwest – via U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  5. 1 2 "Resolution No. 330: Amendment No. 2 to the WNP-1 and 4 Site Certification Agreement" (PDF). Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council. 13 April 2010. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Nuclear Projects Nos. 1 and 4 (WNP-1/4)". Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council. 2009. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  7. ↑ Steele, Karen Dorn (28 March 1984). "Change possible: Northwest's power surplus status extended in committee's forecast". The Spokesman-Review. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  8. ↑ Issues Associated with Completing WNP-1 as a Defense Materials Production Reactor (Report). United States Government Accountability Office. 21 September 1988. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  9. ↑ Questions Associated with Completing WNP-1 as a Defense Materials Production Reactor (Report). United States Government Accountability Office. 21 September 1988. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  10. ↑ Camden, Jim; Steele, Karen Dorn (1 December 1988). "Hanford conversion questioned at hearing". The Spokesman-Review. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  11. ↑ Counsil, William G. (1995). "Use of WNP-2 to Burn HEU & Pu as Fuel". In Kursunoglu, Behram N.; Mintz, Stephan L.; Perlmutter, Arnold (eds.). Global Energy Demand in Transition: The New Role of Electricity. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 229–236. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1048-6. ISBN   978-1-4899-1050-9 . Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  12. 1 2 Energy Northwest Nuclear Projects 1 & 4: Site Restoration Plan (PDF) (Report). Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council. June 1999. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  13. ↑ "Resolution No. 302: Energy Northwest Nuclear Projects Nos. 1 and 4 Site Restoration Plan" (PDF). Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council. 9 December 2002. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  14. ↑ Craig, John W. (15 May 2001). Weekly Information Report - Week ending May 11, 2001 (PDF) (Report). Office of the Executive Director for Operations. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  15. ↑ 67 FR 4475
  16. ↑ Energy Northwest Executive Board Review of Nuclear Program (PDF) (Report). Energy Northwest. 23 January 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2012. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  17. ↑ Travers, William D. (12 October 2001). Future Licensing and Inspection Readiness Assessment (PDF) (Report). Office of the Executive Director for Operations. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  18. ↑ Craig, John W. (9 May 2002). Weekly Information Report - Week ending May 3, 2002 (PDF) (Report). Office of the Executive Director for Operations. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  19. ↑ "WNP-1: Energy Northwest Presentation to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission" (PDF). Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 4 December 2001. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  20. ↑ 71 FR 52824
  21. ↑ Lubinski, John W.; Haney, Catherine (8 February 2007). "Energy Northwest Nuclear Project No. 1 – Termination of Construction Permit CPPR-134 (TAC No. MC9245)" (PDF). Letter to Parrish, J.V. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  22. ↑ Brass, Larisa (28 August 2008). "TVA considers project at Bellefonte". Knoxville News Sentinel. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  23. ↑ "NRC extends TVA construction permit for Bellefonte reactor". Knoxville News Sentinel. 3 October 2011. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  24. ↑ Flory, Josh (18 August 2011). "TVA approves completion of Bellefonte nuclear plant, rate increase". Knoxville News Sentinel. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  25. ↑ Marcum, Ed (21 August 2010). "$248M OK'd for TVA Bellefonte site in Ala". Knoxville News Sentinel. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  26. ↑ "TVA withdraws construction permit for abandoned Bellefonte nuclear project after judge nixes sale to private group". 17 September 2021.
  27. ↑ "Federal awards put Tri-Cities on map for next generation nuclear power". 15 December 2020.
  28. ↑ {https://www.geekwire.com/2021/bill-gates-terrapower-makes-its-pick-for-next-gen-nuclear-power-plant-in-wyoming/}
  29. ↑ {https://x-energy.com/media/news-releases/energy-northwest-x-energy-joint-development-agreement-xe-100 }
  30. ↑ "Puget Power Will Seek End to Nuclear Project". The New York Times. 31 August 1983. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  31. ↑ Dullenty, Jim; Crowell, Todd (22 October 1979). "Hanford: Its future role". The Spokesman-Review. AP. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.