Crystal River Nuclear Plant

Crystal River Nuclear Plant
Aerial of Crystal River Nuclear Plant
Official name	Crystal River Nuclear Plant
Country	United States
Location	Crystal River, Florida
Coordinates	28°57.45′N82°41.90′W / 28.95750°N 82.69833°W / 28.95750; -82.69833
Status	Being decommissioned
Construction began	September 25, 1968 (1968-09-25)
Commission date	March 13, 1977 (1977-03-13)
Decommission date	–
Construction cost	$1.436 billion (2007) [1]
Owner	Duke Energy
Duke Energy
Nuclear power station
Reactor type	PWR
Reactor supplier	Babcock & Wilcox
Thermal capacity	2568
Power generation
Nameplate capacity	860 MW
Capacity factor	66.4%
External links
Website	www.duke-energy.com/our-company/about-us/power-plants/crystal-river

The Crystal River Nuclear Plant also called the Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant, or simply CR-3, is a closed nuclear power plant located in Crystal River, Florida. As of 2013 ^[update] the facility is being decommissioned, a process expected to last 60 years. ^{[2] [3]} The power plant was completed and licensed to operate in December 1976, and operated safely for 33 years until shutdown in September 2009. It was the third plant built as part of the 4,700-acre (1,900 ha) Crystal River Energy Complex (CREC) which contains a single nuclear power plant, while sharing the site with four operational fossil fuel power plants.

The Crystal River reactor went offline in September 2009 for refueling, OTSG replacement (once through steam generator), and 20% power up-rate outage. In preparing the containment building for making the opening to replace the two OTSG's, tendons in the containment building wall were detensioned. During the concrete removal in creating the opening workers discovered a large gap in the concrete of the containment building wall. The main cause of the gap, which further engineering analysis determined was a large delamination, was attributed to the scope and sequence of the tendon detensioning. ^[4] The plant had originally been scheduled to restart in April 2011, but the project encountered a number of delays. ^[5] Repairs were successful, but additional delamination began to occur in adjacent bays. After several months of analyzing options, Duke Energy senior executives announced in February 2013 that the Crystal River Nuclear Plant would be permanently shut down. ^[6] The costs were estimated at $1.18 billion over the next 60 years of decommissioning. ^[7]

The coal-fired units are not affected. ^[8]

Crystal River was originally owned by Florida Progress Corporation (and operated by its subsidiary, Florida Power Corporation) but, in 2000, it was bought by Carolina Power & Light to form the new company, Progress Energy. Progress Energy owned 91.8% of the plant; the remainder is owned by nine municipal utilities. Effective July 2, 2012, Duke Energy purchased Progress Energy and made it a wholly owned direct unit of Duke Energy. ^[9]

Power plant and containment

Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant was an operating 860 MWe, PWR (pressurized water reactor plant). There are three main barriers that protect the public from the radiation hazards associated with nuclear operations. One of those barriers is known as the containment building which houses the fuel, the reactor, and the reactor cooling system. The Crystal River containment building is a steel lined post-tensioned (prestressed concrete) cylindrical concrete structure approximately 157 feet (48 m) in height with an outside diameter of about 138 feet (42 m). The containment has 42-inch thick concrete walls, has a flat foundation mat and a shallow torispherical dome. Post-tensioning is achieved by utilizing an outer array of horizontal tendons immediately adjacent to an inner array of vertical tendons that are embedded in the walls about 15 inches from the outside surface.

Refueling outage, containment repairs and closure

CR-3 went offline in September 2009 for RFO-16. While the reactor was down, the old steam generators were to be replaced. There are 426 steel tendons within the concrete walls of the reactor containment dome which reinforce the dome. Plan developer Sargent & Lundy specified that 97 tendons be loosened. Progress rejected that number as excessive. The next proposal was to loosen 74 tendons, which was typical of other nuclear plants doing the procedure. According to a Progress employee, "de-tensioning the tendons is a very expensive and time-consuming effort", so the number was further reduced to 65. Progress engaged Bechtel to provide a 3rd party review, which agreed that 65 was appropriate. However, when the work was performed, only 27 tendons were loosened, and a foreman and supervisor sent emails questioning the way the tendons were loosened. ^[10]

When workers began to cut the access hole for the steam generators, a crack formed. That crack was repaired, but more cracks appeared. Engineers noticed that parts of the concrete had delaminated. This was repaired, and the concrete re-tensioned, but the same problem was found in other areas. The plant had originally been due to restart in April 2011 following the uprate, but in June 2011 Progress Energy said that it did not expect it to restart until 2014. Preliminary cost estimates for the repairs was put at between $900 million and $1.3 billion, ^[5] but this estimate was later called into question by Duke Energy. ^[11] In October 2012 an independent review estimated the repair cost at $1.5 billion, with a worst-case scenario of $3.4 billion. ^[12] In February 2013 Duke Energy announced that Crystal River would be permanently shut down and that they will recover $850 million in insurance claims. ^[6] A Duke spokesperson stated, "The company sought input from numerous engineering experts — internally and externally — and used proven industry-accepted practices when determining how to replace the steam generators. Analysis has shown that the 2009 delamination (cracking) could not have been predicted. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirmed these findings." ^[10]

Gregory Jaczko, former chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, stated, "That's a multi-billion dollar asset that had to be shut down because of improper work planning, improper understanding of how to properly do this containment retrofit". ^[10]

Surrounding population

The NRC defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity. ^[13]

The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Crystal River was 20,695, an increase of 50.9 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 1,046,741, an increase of 32.4 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Ocala, (38 miles (61 km) to city center) and Spring Hill (34 miles (55 km) to city center). ^[14]

Seismic risk

On September 10, 2006, a magnitude 5.8 earthquake occurred 300 miles southwest of the nuclear plant, ^[15] no damage occurred to the Crystal River Nuclear Power Plant from the rare quake. The odds of such a quake happening again in the near-term around Florida are low. ^[16]

The NRC's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Crystal River was 1 in 45,455, according to an NRC study published in August 2010. ^{[17] [18]}

Electricity Production

Generation (MWh) of Crystal River Nuclear Plant ^[19]

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Annual (Total)
2001	634,065	573,248	634,548	611,651	333,209	592,487	621,776	617,633	560,076	108,249	611,764	615,487	6,114,193
2002	631,798	571,245	631,962	608,001	594,143	605,412	622,390	622,296	605,075	629,388	543,833	634,766	7,300,309
2003	634,097	574,608	639,946	603,558	626,708	609,293	626,598	627,104	518,590	44,698	444,060	630,171	6,579,431
2004	642,042	600,830	563,406	620,121	635,435	605,340	625,326	626,628	497,578	628,796	620,363	637,445	7,303,310
2005	640,517	578,738	640,285	533,727	628,281	597,563	625,955	623,747	609,988	527,344	0	344,792	6,350,937
2006	468,911	578,318	423,584	615,711	633,455	607,045	613,749	518,624	602,771	631,644	619,006	640,912	7,353,730
2007	640,692	497,379	639,665	619,406	637,476	611,760	626,878	627,563	613,504	621,924	38,434	498,209	6,673,890
2008	630,153	607,162	209,500	628,614	607,241	619,994	638,986	539,271	623,226	648,866	629,751	617,315	6,600,079
2009	584,227	539,566	649,282	623,484	644,394	617,713	639,129	574,115	515,827	0	0	0	4,388,737
2010	0	0	0	0	0	20	0	74	0	0	34	0	128
2011	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

See also

• United States portal
• Energy portal
• Nuclear technology portal

• Progress Energy Inc
• Levy County Nuclear Power Plant

References

1. "EIA - State Nuclear Profiles". Energy Information Administration. Retrieved October 3, 2017.
2. Duke Energy (December 2, 2013). "Crystal River Unit 3 - Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report" (PDF). Pbadupws.nrc.gov. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
3. Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant. NRC, update 13 Apr 2022
4. "CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT - SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT 05000302/2009007" (PDF). Nrc.gov. October 12, 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
5. "Progress analyzing Crystal River repair proposals". World Nuclear News. January 11, 2012.
6. "Crystal River Nuclear Plant to be retired; company evaluating sites for potential new gas-fueled generation". Duke-energy.com. February 5, 2013. Archived from the original on October 22, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
7. Shutting down Crystal River nuclear plant will cost $1.2 billion, take 60 years. Tampa Bay Times, 11 Dec 2013
8. "Duke Energy shuts down Crystal River nuclear plant permanently". CFN13. Archived from the original on February 8, 2013. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
9. "Duke Energy Acquires Progress Energy". Finance.yahoo.com. July 5, 2012. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
10. Penn, Ivan (October 13, 2013). "Settlement likely to end inquiries into Duke Energy nuclear plant". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
11. "Repair costs rise at Crystal River nuclear plant". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
12. "Duke to retire Crystal River nuclear plant". Nuclear Engineering International. February 5, 2013. Retrieved February 6, 2013.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
13. "NRC: Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness for Nuclear Power Plants". Archived from the original on October 2, 2006. Retrieved December 13, 2013.
14. "Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors". NBC News. April 14, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
15. "Magnitude 6.0 - GULF OF MEXICO". Archived from the original on April 1, 2016. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
16. "Florida". Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
17. "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk". NBC News. March 17, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
18. "Safety/Risk Assessment Results for Generic Issue 199, "Implications of Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Estimates in Central and Eastern United States on Existing Plants"" (PDF). MSNBC. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 25, 2017. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
19. "Electricity Data Browser". www.eia.gov. Retrieved November 3, 2024.

External links

• "Crystal River Nuclear Power Plant, Florida". Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). August 29, 2008. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
• "Crystal River 3 Pressurized Water Reactor". Operating Nuclear Power Reactors. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). February 14, 2008. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
• NukeWorker Archived March 10, 2007, at the Wayback Machine