Levy County Nuclear Power Plant

Last updated

Levy County Nuclear Power Plant
Levy County Nuclear Power Plant
CountryUnited States
Location Levy County, Florida
Coordinates 29°4.4′N82°37.3′W / 29.0733°N 82.6217°W / 29.0733; -82.6217 Coordinates: 29°4.4′N82°37.3′W / 29.0733°N 82.6217°W / 29.0733; -82.6217 [1]
StatusCancelled
Construction costestimated $19–24 billion (includes $3 billion for transmission lines)
Owner(s) Progress Energy Inc
Nuclear power station
Reactor type PWR
Reactor supplier Westinghouse
Power generation
Units cancelled2 × 1117 MW AP1000

The Levy County Nuclear Power Plant was a proposed nuclear power plant in Levy County, Florida. Progress Energy Florida originally estimated that the reactors would cost $5 billion and would commence operation in 2016. It later became clear[ how? ] that the Levy County reactors would not have started operation until at least 2026. [2] [3] Since Progress filed its application for the new plant in 2008 demand for electricity had been growing very slowly, and natural gas prices were extremely low at the time. The utility estimated that the reactors would cost between $17 billion and $22 billion, not counting financing charges and cost overruns. According to economist Mark Cooper, opposition to the project has mounted, threatening a rerun of the 1970s and 1980s, when the majority of nuclear construction plans were canceled or abandoned. [2]

Contents

On August 1, 2013, Duke Energy terminated the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreement for the Levy nuclear project, as part of a settlement with Florida's consumer advocates. [3] [4] On August 29, 2017, Duke Energy officially decided not to move forward with construction. [5]

History

The Levy County Nuclear Power Plant was the umbrella term for a proposed nuclear power plant in Levy County, Florida. In 2006, Progress Energy Florida (PEF) announced the selection of 5,100 acres (2,100 ha) in southern Levy County for the potential construction of new nuclear reactors. The site's proximity to the company's existing Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant was expected to provide opportunities for efficiencies in shared support functions at both facilities. However, Progress Energy (at this point a subsidiary of Duke Energy) announced the decommissioning of the Crystal River reactor in February 2013 after cracks formed in its containment dome, estimated at $1.5 billion to repair. The company made no reference to constructing any new nuclear facilities in the region, only stating that it is "evaluating a number of potential sites for new plant capacity that may be needed in the future to meet Florida customer needs." [6]

Progress Energy Florida submitted a filing with the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) on March 11, 2008, outlining its need for additional electricity and proposing to meet that need with two nuclear units in Levy County. The PSC scheduled hearings on the project in late May, and approved it in July. [7] The company then applied for a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on July 30, 2008. Costs of the power plant were estimated at $19–24 billion, including $3 billion for necessary transmission upgrades. The first reactor was expected to come online in 2024 and the second one 18 months later. [8]

On October 14, 2008, the PSC voted to allow PEF to charge customers an additional $11.42 per 1,000  kW·h, beginning in January 2009, to pay for the Levy plant and work upgrading the Crystal River plant. [9] [10]

On January 5, 2009, PEF awarded an engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contract to Westinghouse and The Shaw Group's nuclear division to build the two reactors for $7.65 billion. The reactors were supposed to become operational between 2016 and 2018. [11] [12] [13] In May, after the NRC denied permission to begin excavation work on the site to prepare for construction prior to issuing the COL, Progress Energy announced that commercial operation of the two new reactors had been pushed back "a minimum of 20 months." In view of the delay, Progress Energy has requested approval from the Public Service Commission to reduce the project cost to consumers in 2010 from $12.63 to $6.69 per 1000 kW·h. [14]

On August 11, 2009, Florida governor Charlie Crist and his cabinet unanimously adopted the recommendation of the state Department of Environmental Protection, and approved the plant's Site Certification Application (SCA). Site certification is the last major state-level approval needed before Progress can start constructing the Levy plant. The approval included a requirement that Progress shut down coal-fired electrical generating units 1 & 2 at its nearby Crystal River Energy Complex by the end of 2020, assuming the timely licensing and construction of the Levy nuclear power plant. [15]

On August 1, 2013, as part of a comprehensive settlement with a group representing Florida consumers Duke Energy announced termination of the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) agreement for the Levy nuclear project and consideration of a natural gas-fueled alternative, but said it would continue to seek a combined construction and operating license (COL) for the project from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). A final decision was to be made in the future based on "energy needs, project costs, carbon regulation, natural gas prices, existing or future legislative provisions for cost recovery, and the requirements of the NRC’s COL" and other factors. [4] [16] Research published in May 2013 by The Tampa Bay Times showed that a plant fueled by natural gas was nearly certain to be cheaper than a nuclear-fueled plant over the next 6 decades. [17] About $1 billion had been spent on the preparatory work for the Levy nuclear project. [18]

On October 20, 2016, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission cleared the way for the agencies Office of New Reactors to issue two (2) Combined Licenses (COLs) for the Levy County site. Based on the mandatory hearing on Duke’s application, the NRC found the staff’s review adequate to make the necessary regulatory safety and environmental findings. [19] The licenses will authorize Duke Energy Florida to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the site, near Inglis in Levy County. The staff will impose conditions on the license, including specific actions associated with the agency’s post-Fukushima requirements for mitigation strategies and spent fuel pool instrumentation; and a pre-startup schedule for implementing post-Fukushima aspects of the new reactors’ emergency preparedness plans and procedures. [20]

In August 2017, Duke announced a settlement with the Florida Public Service Commission stating, "The company will also no longer move forward with building the Levy Nuclear Project and customers will not pay any further costs associated with the project." [21]

Reactor data

The Levy County Nuclear Power Plant was planned to consist of two reactors:

Reactor unit [22] Reactor typeCapacityConstruction startedElectricity grid connectionCommercial operationShutdown
NetGross
Levy County-1 (planned) [23] AP10001117 MWMW
Levy County-2 (planned) [24] AP10001117 MWMW

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant located in New Hill, North Carolina

The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant with a single Westinghouse designed pressurized-water nuclear reactor operated by Duke Energy. It was named in honor of W. Shearon Harris, former president of Carolina Power & Light. Located in New Hill, North Carolina, in the United States, about 20 miles (30 km) southwest of Raleigh, it generates 900 MWe, has a 523-foot (160 m) natural draft cooling tower, and uses Harris Lake for cooling. The reactor achieved criticality in January 1987 and began providing power commercially on May 2 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duke Energy</span> American electrical power and natural gas company

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crystal River Nuclear Plant</span> Closed nuclear power plant in Florida

The Crystal River Nuclear Plant also called the Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant, or simply CR-3, is a closed nuclear power plant located in Crystal River, Florida. The facility is currently being decommissioned and is transitioning to a SAFSTOR condition. The power plant was completed and licensed to operate in December 1976, and operated safely for 33 years until shutdown in September 2009. It was the third plant built as part of the 4,700-acre (1,900 ha) Crystal River Energy Complex (CREC) which contains a single nuclear power plant, while sharing the site with four operational fossil fuel power plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear and gas-fired power plant located near Homestead, Florida

Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear and gas-fired power plant located on a 3,300-acre (1,300 ha) site two miles east of Homestead, Florida, United States, next to Biscayne National Park located about 25 miles (40 km) south of Miami, Florida near the southernmost edge of Miami-Dade County. The facility is owned by Florida Power & Light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Anna Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear power plant in Louisa County, Virginia

The North Anna Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on a 1,075-acre (435 ha) site in Louisa County, Virginia, in the Mid-Atlantic United States. The site is operated by Dominion Generation company and is jointly owned by the Dominion Virginia Power corporation (88.4%) and by the Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (11.6%).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Watts Bar Nuclear Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Rhea County, Tennessee

The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant is a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) nuclear reactor pair used for electric power generation. It is located on a 1,770-acre (7.2 km²) site in Rhea County, Tennessee, near Spring City, between the cities of Chattanooga and Knoxville. Watts Bar supplies enough electricity for about 1,200,000 households in the Tennessee Valley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vogtle Electric Generating Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Burke County, Georgia, US

The Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, also known as Plant Vogtle, is a two-unit nuclear power plant located in Burke County, near Waynesboro, Georgia, in the southeastern United States. It is named after a former Alabama Power and Southern Company board chairman, Alvin Vogtle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear power plant located near Jenkinsville, South Carolina

The Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Power Station occupies a site near Jenkinsville, South Carolina, in Fairfield County, South Carolina, approximately 20 miles (32 km) northwest of Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Texas Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear power plant in Matagorda County, Texas

The South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, is a nuclear power station southwest of Bay City, Texas, United States. STP occupies a 12,200-acre (4,900 ha) site west of the Colorado River about 90 miles (140 km) southwest of Houston. It consists of two Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors and is cooled by a 7,000-acre (2,800 ha) reservoir, which eliminates the need for cooling towers.

The "Nuclear Power 2010 Program" was launched in 2002 by President George W. Bush in 2002, 13 months after the beginning of his presidency, in order to restart orders for nuclear power reactors in the U.S. by providing subsidies for a handful of Generation III+ demonstration plants. The expectation was that these plants would come online by 2010, but it was not met.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AP1000</span> American pressurized water cooling nuclear reactor design

The AP1000 is a nuclear power plant designed and sold by Westinghouse Electric Company. The plant is a pressurized water reactor with improved use of passive nuclear safety and many design features intended to lower its capital cost and improve its economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in the United States</span> Power source providing US electricity

Nuclear power in the United States is provided by 92 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 94.7 gigawatts (GW), with 61 pressurized water reactors and 31 boiling water reactors. In 2019, they produced a total of 809.41 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for 20% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2018, nuclear comprised nearly 50 percent of US emission-free energy generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear decommissioning</span> Process of shutting down a nuclear facility

Nuclear decommissioning is the process whereby a nuclear facility is dismantled to the point that it no longer requires measures for radiation protection. The presence of radioactive material necessitates processes that are potentially occupationally hazardous, expensive, time-intensive, and present environmental risks that must be addressed to ensure radioactive materials are either transported elsewhere for storage or stored on-site in a safe manner. The challenge in nuclear decommissioning is not just technical, but also economical and social.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crystal River Energy Complex</span> Power plant in Florida, US

The Crystal River Energy Complex consists of seven power-generating plants on a 4,700-acre (1,900 ha) site near the mouth of the Crystal River in Citrus County, Florida. Crystal River 1, 2, 4, and 5 are fossil fuel power plants. Crystal River 3 was previously the sole nuclear power plant on the site (1977-2013). The Crystal River Combined Cycle site consists of two Mitsubishi gas turbines, which came on-line in 2018. The complex was developed in the early 1960s by the Florida Power Corporation and sold to Progress Energy Inc in 2000. Following Progress Energy's merger with Duke Energy in 2012, the facility is owned and operated by Duke Energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power station in Texas

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant is located in Somervell County, Texas. The nuclear power plant is located 40 miles (64 km) southwest of Ft. Worth and about 60 miles (97 km) southwest of Dallas. It relies on nearby Squaw Creek Reservoir for cooling water. The plant has about 1,300 employees and is operated by Luminant Generation, a subsidiary of Vistra Corp.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Next Generation Nuclear Plant</span> Cancelled American reactor project

A Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) is a specific proposed generation IV very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR) that could be coupled to a neighboring hydrogen production facility. It could also produce electricity and supply process heat. Up to 30% of this heat could be used to produce hydrogen via high-temperature electrolysis significantly reducing the cost of the process. The envisioned reactor design is helium-cooled, using graphite-moderated thermal neutrons, and TRISO fueled.

The William States Lee III Nuclear Station was a planned two-unit nuclear power plant in Cherokee County, South Carolina. Duke Energy filed the Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application for the plant on December 13, 2007 to the NRC. On December 19, 2016, the NRC issued two Combined Licenses authorizing Duke to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the site.

The Victoria County Station was a proposed nuclear power plant, in Victoria County, 13.3 miles south of Victoria, Texas. The plant, consisting of two 1535 MWe General-Electric-Hitachi economic simplified boiling water reactors was applied for by the Exelon Nuclear Texas Holdings, LLC on September 2, 2008. The project was canceled in August 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear renaissance in the United States</span> Potential nuclear power industry revival in the U.S.

Between 2007 and 2009, 13 companies applied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for construction and operating licenses to build 31 new nuclear power reactors in the United States. However, the case for widespread nuclear plant construction has been hampered due to inexpensive natural gas, slow electricity demand growth in a weak US economy, lack of financing, and safety concerns following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear energy policy of the United States</span> Overview of the nuclear energy policy in the United States of America

The nuclear energy policy of the United States began in 1954 and continued with the ongoing building of nuclear power plants, the enactment of numerous pieces of legislation such as the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and the implementation of countless policies which have guided the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy in the regulation and growth of nuclear energy companies. This includes, but is not limited to, regulations of nuclear facilities, waste storage, decommissioning of weapons-grade materials, uranium mining, and funding for nuclear companies, along with an increase in power plant building. Both legislation and bureaucratic regulations of nuclear energy in the United States have been shaped by scientific research, private industries' wishes, and public opinion, which has shifted over time and as a result of different nuclear disasters.

References

  1. "Crystal River Nuclear Plant Safety Information 2006-2007" (PDF). Progress Energy. p. 10. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 30, 2006. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
  2. 1 2 Mark Cooper (July–August 2012). "Nuclear safety and affordable reactors: Can we have both?" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . p. 61. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2012.
  3. 1 2 "Duke Energy cancels EPC contract for Levy County". Nuclear Engineering International. August 2, 2013. Retrieved August 5, 2013.
  4. 1 2 "Duke Energy reaches revised multi-year settlement with Florida consumer advocates". Duke Energy. August 3, 2013. Archived from the original on August 6, 2013. Retrieved August 3, 2013. The company will make a final decision on new nuclear generation in Florida in the future based on, among other factors, energy needs, project costs, carbon regulation, natural gas prices, existing or future legislative provisions for cost recovery, and the requirements of the NRC’s COL.
  5. Energy, Duke. "Duke Energy Florida files settlement agreement for building a smarter energy future". Duke Energy | News Center. Retrieved September 1, 2017.
  6. "Crystal River Nuclear Plant to be retired; company evaluating sites for potential new gas-fueled generation". February 5, 2013. Archived from the original on October 22, 2013.
  7. DiSavino, Scott (July 15, 2008). "Florida OKs Progress request to build nuclear units". Reuters . Retrieved July 15, 2008.
  8. "Levy nuclear project moved back by three years". World Nuclear News . May 2, 2012. Retrieved May 4, 2012.
  9. "Utilities to recover costs of new capacity in Florida". World Nuclear News . October 15, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  10. Russell Ray (January 5, 2009). "Progress Energy To Buy And Build Nuclear Reactors". Tampa Bay Online. MSNBC.com . Retrieved January 6, 2009.[ dead link ]
  11. "Contract to build new nuclear at Levy". World Nuclear News. January 6, 2009. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  12. "Shaw and Westinghouse Awarded EPC Contract by Progress Energy Florida for Two AP1000 Nuclear Units at Greenfield Site in Florida". Reuters. January 5, 2009. Archived from the original on February 1, 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  13. "Progress Energy Florida signs contract for new, advanced-design nuclear plant". Progress Energy Florida. January 5, 2009. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  14. "Delay in groundwork for Florida nuclear". World Nuclear News. May 5, 2009. Retrieved August 11, 2009.
  15. "Florida cabinet approves Levy plant". World Nuclear News. August 12, 2009. Retrieved August 11, 2009.
  16. Matthew L. Wald (August 1, 2013). "Florida Nuclear Project Is Dropped". The New York Times. Retrieved August 3, 2013.
  17. PennIvan Penn (August 1, 2013). "Duke Energy to cancel proposed Levy County nuclear plant". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved August 3, 2013. In May, the Times reported that, over a 60 year lifespan, the Levy plant would cost more than an equivalent natural gas plant under any reasonable scenario.
  18. "Levy nuclear plant project shelved". World Nuclear News. August 2, 2013. Retrieved August 5, 2013.
  19. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 25, 2016. Retrieved June 25, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  20. https://www.nrc.gov/
  21. Energy, Duke. "Duke Energy Florida files settlement agreement for building a smarter energy future". Duke Energy | News Center. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
  22. Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „United States of America: Nuclear Power Reactors- Alphabetic“ Archived June 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  23. Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - LEVY COUNTY-1“
  24. Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - LEVY COUNTY-2“