Nuclear reactor accidents in the United States

Last updated
Erosion of the 6-inch-thick (150 mm) carbon steel reactor head, caused by a persistent leak of borated water, at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant. Davis-BesseHole.png
Erosion of the 6-inch-thick (150 mm) carbon steel reactor head, caused by a persistent leak of borated water, at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.

The United States Government Accountability Office reported more than 150 incidents from 2001 to 2006 of nuclear plants not performing within acceptable safety guidelines. According to a 2010 survey of energy accidents, there have been at least 56 accidents at nuclear reactors in the United States (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage). The most serious of these was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979. [1] Relatively few accidents have involved fatalities. [2]

Contents

Context of Nuclear Accidents

Globally, there have been at least 99 (civilian and military) recorded nuclear reactor accidents from 1952 to 2009 (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage, the amount the US federal government uses to define major energy accidents that must be reported), totaling US$20.5 billion in property damages. The accidents involved meltdowns, explosions, fires, and loss of coolant, and occurred during both normal operation and extreme emergency conditions (such as droughts and earthquakes). Property damage costs include destruction of property, emergency response, environmental remediation, evacuation, lost product, fines, and court claims. [2] Because nuclear reactors are large and complex, accidents onsite tend to be relatively expensive. [3]

In the U.S., at least 56 nuclear reactor accidents have occurred. [2] The most serious of these U.S. accidents was the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station has been the source of two of the top five most dangerous nuclear incidents in the United States since 1979. [1]

The United States Government Accountability Office reported more than 150 incidents from 2001 to 2006 of nuclear plants not performing within acceptable safety guidelines. In 2006, it said: "Since 2001, the ROP has resulted in more than 4,000 inspection findings concerning nuclear power plant licensees' failure to fully comply with NRC regulations and industry standards for safe plant operation, and NRC has subjected more than 75 percent (79) of the 103 operating plants to increased oversight for varying periods". [4]

History

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 encouraged private corporations in the United States to build nuclear reactors and a significant learning phase followed with many early partial core meltdowns and accidents at experimental reactors and research facilities. [5] This led to the introduction of the Price-Anderson Act in 1957, which was "an implicit admission that nuclear power provided risks that producers were unwilling to assume without federal backing". [5]

Nuclear reactor accidents continued into the 1960s with a small test reactor exploding at the Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One in Idaho Falls in January 1961 resulting in three deaths which were the first fatalities in the history of U.S. nuclear reactor operations. [6] There was also a partial meltdown at the Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station in Michigan in 1966. [5]

The large size of nuclear reactors ordered during the late 1960s raised new safety questions and created fears of a severe reactor accident that would send large quantities of radiation into the environment. In the early 1970s, a highly contentious debate over the performance of emergency core cooling systems in nuclear plants, designed to prevent a core meltdown that could lead to the "China syndrome", received coverage in the popular media and technical journals. [7] [8]

In 1976, four nuclear engineersthree from GE and one from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission— resigned, stating that nuclear power was not as safe as their superiors were claiming. [9] [10] [11] [12] They testified to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy that:

"the cumulative effect of all design defects and deficiencies in the design, construction and operations of nuclear power plants makes a nuclear power plant accident, in our opinion, a certain event. The only question is when, and where. [9]

Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Accident

President Jimmy Carter leaving Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station for Middletown, Pennsylvania, April 1, 1979 Carter leaving Three Mile Island.jpg
President Jimmy Carter leaving Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station for Middletown, Pennsylvania, April 1, 1979

On March 28, 1979, equipment failures and operator error contributed to loss of coolant and a partial core meltdown of Unit 2's pressurized water reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. [13] The scope and complexity of this reactor accident became clear over the course of five days, as a number of agencies at the local, state and federal levels tried to solve the problem and decide whether the ongoing accident required an emergency evacuation, and to what extent.

Cleanup started in August 1979 and officially ended in December 1993, with a total cleanup cost of about $1 billion. [14] In his 2007 preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, Benjamin K. Sovacool, estimated that the TMI accident caused a total of $2.4 billion in property damages. [15] The health effects of the Three Mile Island accident are widely, but not universally, agreed to be very low level. [16] [17]

The TMI accident forced regulatory and operational improvements on a reluctant industry, but it also increased opposition to nuclear power. [18] The accident triggered protests around the world. [19]

List of accidents and incidents

Nuclear reactor accidents in the U.S. [3] [20]
DateLocationDescriptionFatalitiesCost
(in millions
2006 US$)
INES
rating
November 29, 1955 Idaho Falls, Idaho, USPower excursion with partial core meltdown at National Reactor Testing Station's EBR-1 Experimental Breeder Reactor I 05
July 26, 1959 Simi Valley, California, USAPartial core meltdown at Santa Susana Field Laboratory's Sodium Reactor Experiment 032
January 3, 1961 Idaho Falls, Idaho, USSteam explosion and meltdown results in three fatalities at National Reactor Testing Station's SL-1 Stationary Low-Power Reactor Number One 3224
July 24, 1964 Charlestown, Rhode Island, USAAn error by a worker at a United Nuclear Corporation fuel facility led to an accidental criticality1 ??
October 5, 1966 Monroe, Michigan, USASodium cooling system malfunctions at Enrico Fermi demonstration breeder reactor causing partial core meltdown019
July 16, 1971 Cordova, Illinois, USAAn electrician is electrocuted by a live cable at the Quad Cities Unit 1 reactor on the Mississippi River11
April 21, 1973 Pacific Ocean, 370 miles from Puget Sound Primary coolant leak on board the USS Guardfish while underway [21] 0unknown
August 11, 1973 Covert Township, Michigan, USA Steam generator leak at the Palisades Nuclear Generating Station causes manual shutdown of pressurized water reactor010
March 22, 1975 Athens, Alabama, USAFire burns for seven hours and damages more than 1600 control cables for three nuclear reactors at Browns Ferry, disabling core cooling systems0240
November 5, 1975 Brownville, Nebraska, USAHydrogen gas explosion damages the Cooper Nuclear Facility's auxiliary building013
June 10, 1977 Waterford, Connecticut, USAHydrogen gas explosion damages three buildings and forces shutdown of Millstone-1 Boiling Water Reactor015
February 4, 1979 Surry, Virginia, USA Surry Unit 2 shut down in response to failing tube bundles in steam generators012
March 28, 1979 Middletown, Pennsylvania, USLoss of coolant and partial core meltdown, see Three Mile Island accident and Three Mile Island accident health effects 02,4005 [22]
November 22, 1980 San Clemente, California, USAWorker cleaning breaker cubicles at San Onofre Pressurized Water Reactor contacts an energized line and is electrocuted11
January 25, 1982 Ontario, New York, USA Ginna Nuclear Generating Station (then operated by Rochester Gas & Electric now by Constellation Energy Nuclear Group) experiences a steam tube rupture, releasing radioactivity into the environment.01
February 26, 1982 San Clemente, California, USASouthern California Company shuts down San Onofre Unit 1 out of concerns about earthquake01
March 20, 1982 Scriba, New York, USARecirculation system piping fails at Nine Mile Point Unit 1, forcing two year shutdown045
March 25, 1982 Buchanan, New York, USADamage to steam generator tubes and main generator resulting in a shut down Indian Point Energy Center Unit 3 for more than a year056
June 18, 1982 Seneca, South Carolina, USAFeedwater heat extraction line fails at Oconee 2 Pressurised Water Reactor, damaging thermal cooling system010
February 12, 1983 Forked River, New Jersey, USA Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station fails safety inspection, forced to shut down for repairs032
February 26, 1983 Fort Pierce, Florida, USADamaged thermal shield and core barrel support at St. Lucie Unit 1, necessitating 13-month shutdown054
September 15, 1984 Athens, Alabama, USSafety violations, operator error, and design problems force six year outage at Browns Ferry Unit 20110
March 9, 1985 Athens, Alabama, USInstrumentation systems malfunction during start-up, which led to suspension of operations at all three Browns Ferry Units01,830
June 9, 1985 Oak Harbor, Ohio, USLoss of feedwater event at Davis-Besse reactor after main pumps shut down and auxiliary pumps tripped due to operator error. NRC review determines site area emergency should have been declared0 ?
April 11, 1986 Plymouth, Massachusetts, USRecurring equipment problems force emergency shutdown of Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant 01,001
December 9, 1986 Surry, Virginia, USAFeedwater line-burst at Surry Nuclear Power Plant kills 44
March 31, 1987 Delta, Pennsylvania, US Peach Bottom units 2 and 3 shutdown due to cooling malfunctions and unexplained equipment problems0400
July 15, 1987 Burlington, Kansas, USASafety inspector dies from electrocution after contacting a mislabeled wire at Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station 11
December 19, 1987 Scriba, New York, USMalfunctions force Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation to shut down Nine Mile Point Unit 10150
March 29, 1988 Burlington, Kansas, USAA worker at the Wolf Creek Generating Station falls through an unmarked manhole and electrocutes himself when trying to escape11
September 10, 1988 Surry, Virginia, USARefuelling cavity seal fails and destroys internal pipe system at Surry Unit 2, forcing 12-month outage09
March 5, 1989 Tonopah, Arizona, USAAtmospheric dump valves fail at Palo Verde Unit 1, leading to main transformer fire and emergency shutdown014
March 17, 1989 Lusby, Maryland, USInspections at Calvert Cliff Units 1 and 2 reveal cracks at pressurized heater sleeves, forcing extended shutdowns0120
November 17, 1991 Scriba, New York, USASafety and fire problems force shut down of the FitzPatrick nuclear reactor for 13 months05
April 21, 1992 Southport, North Carolina, USANRC forces shut down of Brunswick Units 1 and 2 after emergency diesel generators fail02
February 3, 1993 Bay City, Texas, USAAuxiliary feed-water pumps fail at South Texas Project Units 1 and 2, prompting rapid shutdown of both reactors03
February 27, 1993 Buchanan, New York, USANew York Power Authority shuts down Indian Point Energy Center Unit 3 after AMSAC system fails02
March 2, 1993 Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee, USAEquipment failures and broken pipes cause shut down of Sequoyah Unit 1 03
December 25, 1993 Newport, Michigan, USAShut down of Fermi Unit 2 after main turbine experienced major failure due to improper maintenance067
14 January 1995 Wiscasset, Maine, USASteam generator tubes unexpectedly crack at Maine Yankee nuclear reactor; shut down of the facility for a year062
May 16, 1995 Salem, New Jersey, USAVentilation systems fail at Salem Units 1 and 2034
February 20, 1996 Waterford, Connecticut, USLeaking valve forces shutdown Millstone Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2, multiple equipment failures found0254 [23]
May 15, 1996 Morris, Illinois, USPlunging water levels around the nuclear fuel in the reactor's core prompt shut down at Dresden Generating Station 0 ?
September 2, 1996 Crystal River, Florida, USBalance-of-plant equipment malfunction forces shutdown and extensive repairs at Crystal River Unit 3 0384
September 5, 1996 Clinton, Illinois, USAReactor recirculation pump fails, prompting shut down of Clinton boiling water reactor 038
September 20, 1996 Seneca, Illinois, USAService water system fails and results in closure of LaSalle Units 1 and 2 for more than 2 years071
September 9, 1997 Bridgman, Michigan, USAIce condenser containment systems fail at Cook Units 1 and 2 011
May 25, 1999 Waterford, Connecticut, USASteam leak in feed-water heater causes manual shutdown and damage to control board annunicator at the Millstone Nuclear Power Plant 07
September 29, 1999 Lower Alloways Creek Township, New Jersey, USAMajor Freon leak at Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station causes ventilation train chiller to trip, releasing toxic gas and damaging the cooling system02
February 15, 2000 Buchanan, New York, USANRC Alert issued after steam tube rupture Indian Point Unit 2 [24] 02
February 16, 2002 Oak Harbor, Ohio, USSevere boric acid corrosion of reactor head forces 24-month outage of Davis-Besse reactor 0605 [25] 3
January 15, 2003 Bridgman, Michigan, USAA fault in the main transformer at the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Generating Station causes a fire that damages the main generator and back-up turbines010
June 16, 2005 Braidwood, Illinois, USAExelon's Braidwood nuclear station leaks tritium and contaminates local water supplies041
August 4, 2005 Buchanan, New York, USAEntergy's Indian Point Nuclear Plant leaks tritium and strontium into underground lakes from 1974 to 200530
March 6, 2006 Erwin, Tennessee, USA Nuclear Fuel Services plant spills 35 litres of highly enriched uranium, necessitating 7-month shutdown098
September, 2009 Crystal River, Florida, USAWhen cutting into Crystal River 3 Nuclear Power Plant containment building to create a large opening for the replacement of the Steam generator (nuclear power) the structure was severely cracked resulting in the permanent closure of the facility.01,000+
February 1, 2010 Vernon, Vermont, USDeteriorating underground pipes from the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant leak radioactive tritium into groundwater supplies0700
July 15, 2011 Morris, Illinois, USChemical leak of sodium hypochlorite restricted access to a vital area that houses plant cooling water pumps at Dresden Generating Station 0 ?
January 30, 2012 Byron, Illinois, USAn Unusual Incident, the lowest of four NRC emergency status declarations, occurred. Loss of off-site power caused unit 2 to run a shut down cycle and release a safe, expected amount of tritium steam into the atmosphere. [26] [27] 0Undetermined
March 31, 2013 Russellville, Arkansas, USOne worker was killed and two others injured when part of a generator fell as it was being moved at the Arkansas Nuclear One.1 ?
July 2016 Bridgman, Michigan, USHeavy steam leak into the turbine building of D.C. Cook Nuclear Station0 ?
July 2018 Genoa, Wisconsin, USLa Crosse Boiling Water Reactor Deconstruction leak into Mississippi River0 ?

Nuclear Power Plant Safety

A clean-up crew working to remove radioactive contamination after the Three Mile Island accident. TMI cleanup-2.jpg
A clean-up crew working to remove radioactive contamination after the Three Mile Island accident.

Nuclear safety in the U.S. is governed by federal regulations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC regulates all nuclear plants and materials in the U.S. except for of nuclear plants and materials controlled by the U.S. government, as well those powering naval vessels. [28] [29]

The 1979 Three Mile Island accident was a pivotal event that led to questions about U.S. nuclear safety. [30] Earlier events had a similar effect, including a 1975 fire at Browns Ferry, the 1976 testimonials of three concerned GE nuclear engineers, the GE Three. In 1981, workers inadvertently reversed pipe restraints at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant reactors, compromising seismic protection systems, which further undermined confidence in nuclear safety. All of these well-publicised events undermined public support for the U.S. nuclear industry in the 1970s and the 1980s. [30]

Recent concerns have been expressed about the safety of nuclear reactors. In 2012, the Union of Concerned Scientists, which tracks ongoing safety issues at operating nuclear plants, found that "leakage of radioactive materials is a pervasive problem at almost 90 percent of all reactors, as are issues that pose a risk of nuclear accidents". [31]

Following the Japanese Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, according to Black & Veatch's annual utility survey that took place after the disaster, of the 700 executives from the US electric utility industry that were surveyed, nuclear safety was the top concern. [32] There are likely to be increased requirements for on-site spent fuel management and elevated design basis threats at nuclear power plants. [33] [34] License extensions for existing reactors will face additional scrutiny, with outcomes depending on the degree to which plants can meet new requirements, and some of the extensions already granted for more than 60 of the 104 operating U.S. reactors could be revisited. On-site storage, consolidated long-term storage, and geological disposal of spent fuel is "likely to be reevaluated in a new light because of the Fukushima storage pool experience". [33]

In October 2011, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission instructed agency staff to move forward with seven of the 12 safety recommendations put forward by the federal task force in July. The recommendations include "new standards aimed at strengthening operators' ability to deal with a complete loss of power, ensuring plants can withstand floods and earthquakes and improving emergency response capabilities". The new safety standards will take up to five years to fully implement. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three Mile Island accident</span> 1979 nuclear accident in Pennsylvania, US

The Three Mile Island accident was a partial nuclear meltdown of the Unit 2 reactor (TMI-2) of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station on the Susquehanna River in Londonderry Township, near the capital city of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The reactor accident began at 4:00 a.m. on March 28, 1979, and released radioactive gases and radioactive iodine into the environment. It is the worst accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant history. On the seven-point logarithmic International Nuclear Event Scale, the TMI-2 reactor accident is rated Level 5, an "Accident with Wider Consequences".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear meltdown</span> Reactor accident due to core overheating

A nuclear meltdown is a severe nuclear reactor accident that results in core damage from overheating. The term nuclear meltdown is not officially defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency or by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It has been defined to mean the accidental melting of the core of a nuclear reactor, however, and is in common usage a reference to the core's either complete or partial collapse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear Regulatory Commission</span> Government agency of the United States

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is an independent agency of the United States government tasked with protecting public health and safety related to nuclear energy. Established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, the NRC began operations on January 19, 1975, as one of two successor agencies to the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Its functions include overseeing reactor safety and security, administering reactor licensing and renewal, licensing radioactive materials, radionuclide safety, and managing the storage, security, recycling, and disposal of spent fuel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents</span> Severe disruptive events involving fissile or fusile materials

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility. Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, reactor core melt." The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duane Arnold Energy Center</span> Nuclear power plant located in Iowa

The Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC) was Iowa's only nuclear power plant. It is located on a 500-acre (200 ha) site on the west bank of the Cedar River, two miles (3.2 km) north-northeast of Palo, Iowa, USA, or eight miles (13 km) northwest of Cedar Rapids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Nuclear Event Scale</span> Scale to enable communication of safety information in nuclear accidents

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) was introduced in 1990 by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in order to enable prompt communication of safety significant information in case of nuclear accidents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station</span> Nuclear power plant in Ottawa County, Ohio

Davis–Besse Nuclear Power Station is a 894 megawatt (MW) nuclear power plant, located northeast of Oak Harbor, Ohio in Ottawa County, Ohio. It has a single pressurized water reactor. Davis–Besse is operated by Energy Harbor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Anna Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear power plant in Louisa County, Virginia

The North Anna Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on a 1,075-acre (435 ha) site in Louisa County, Virginia, in the Mid-Atlantic United States. The site is operated by Dominion Generation company and is jointly owned by the Dominion Virginia Power corporation (88.4%) and by the Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (11.6%).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in the United States</span> Power source providing US electricity

In the United States, nuclear power is provided by 92 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 94.7 gigawatts (GW), with 61 pressurized water reactors and 31 boiling water reactors. In 2019, they produced a total of 809.41 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for 20% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2018, nuclear comprised nearly 50 percent of US emission-free energy generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear safety and security</span> Regulations for uses of radioactive materials

Nuclear safety is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "The achievement of proper operating conditions, prevention of accidents or mitigation of accident consequences, resulting in protection of workers, the public and the environment from undue radiation hazards". The IAEA defines nuclear security as "The prevention and detection of and response to, theft, sabotage, unauthorized access, illegal transfer or other malicious acts involving nuclear materials, other radioactive substances or their associated facilities".

Nuclear history of the United States describes the history of nuclear affairs in the United States whether civilian or military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear safety in the United States</span> US safety regulations for nuclear power and weapons

Nuclear safety in the United States is governed by federal regulations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC regulates all nuclear plants and materials in the United States except for nuclear plants and materials controlled by the U.S. government, as well those powering naval vessels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-nuclear movement in the United States</span> Movement opposing the use of nuclear power, weapons, and/or uranium mining

The anti-nuclear movement in the United States consists of more than 80 anti-nuclear groups that oppose nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and/or uranium mining. These have included the Abalone Alliance, Clamshell Alliance, Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Nevada Desert Experience, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Plowshares Movement, United Steelworkers of America (USWA) District 31, Women Strike for Peace, Nukewatch, and Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. Some fringe aspects of the anti-nuclear movement have delayed construction or halted commitments to build some new nuclear plants, and have pressured the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to enforce and strengthen the safety regulations for nuclear power plants. Most groups in the movement focus on nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Hendrie</span> American physicist (1925–2023)

Joseph Mallam Hendrie was an American physicist who was chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). On August 9, 1977 he was named to a four-year term on the Commission and designated as its chairman by President Jimmy Carter. From 1975 to 1977, Hendrie had served as chairman of the Department of Applied Science at Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Arnold "Arnie" Gundersen is a former nuclear industry executive, and engineer with more than 44 years of nuclear industry experience who became a whistleblower in 1990. Gundersen has written dozens of expert reports for nongovernment organizations and the state of Vermont. Gunderson was a licensed reactor operator from 1971-1972 on Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's zero-power open-pool university research reactor at the Reactor Critical Facility in Schenectady, New York, where he was a nuclear engineering graduate student.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear energy policy of the United States</span> Overview of the nuclear energy policy in the United States of America

The nuclear energy policy of the United States began in 1954 and continued with the ongoing building of nuclear power plants, the enactment of numerous pieces of legislation such as the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and the implementation of countless policies which have guided the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy in the regulation and growth of nuclear energy companies. This includes, but is not limited to, regulations of nuclear facilities, waste storage, decommissioning of weapons-grade materials, uranium mining, and funding for nuclear companies, along with an increase in power plant building. Both legislation and bureaucratic regulations of nuclear energy in the United States have been shaped by scientific research, private industries' wishes, and public opinion, which has shifted over time and as a result of different nuclear disasters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear emergency level classification responses</span>

Nuclear power plants pose high risk if chemicals are exposed to those in surrounding communities and areas. This nuclear emergency level classificationresponse system was firstly developed by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow effective and urgent responses to ultimately control and minimise any detrimental effects that nuclear chemicals can have. These classifications come in four different categories – Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency (SAE), as well as General Emergency. Thus, each classification has differing characteristics and purposes, depending on the situation at hand. Every nuclear power plant has a different emergency response action plan, also depending on its structure, location and nature. They were developed by thorough discussion and planning with numerous authoritative parties such as local, state, federal agencies as well as other private and non-profit groups that are in association with emergency services. Today, nuclear emergency plans are continuously being developed over time to be improved for future serious events to keep communities and nuclear power plant working members safe. There is a high emphasis for the need of these emergency responses in case of future events. Thus, nuclear plants can, and have paid up to approximately $78 million to ensure that are required measurements are readily available, and that equipment is sufficient and safe. This is applicable for all nuclear power plants in the United States of America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in Pennsylvania</span>

Nuclear power has been widely established in Pennsylvania since the 1950s and has grown to provide almost 25% of the energy produced in PA. This is achieved through the four active reactors currently operating. There are five inactive reactors in PA, including Three Mile Island, which had a partial meltdown and caused a reevaluation of nuclear reactor safety practices.

References

  1. 1 2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004-09-16). "Davis-Besse preliminary accident sequence precursor analysis" (PDF). Retrieved 2006-06-14. and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004-09-20). "NRC issues preliminary risk analysis of the combined safety issues at Davis-Besse" . Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  2. 1 2 3 Benjamin K. Sovacool. A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, August 2010, pp. 379–380.
  3. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool (2009). The Accidental Century – Prominent Energy Accidents in the Last 100 Years Archived 2012-08-21 at the Wayback Machine
  4. United States Government Accountability Office (2006). "Report to Congress" (PDF). p. 4.
  5. 1 2 3 Benjamin K. Sovacool. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007, Energy Policy 36 (2008), p. 1808.
  6. Perhaps the Worst, Not the First TIME magazine, May 12, 1986.
  7. Walker, J. Samuel (2004). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 10–11.
  8. Wolfgang Rudig (1990). Anti-nuclear Movements: A World Survey of Opposition to Nuclear Energy, Longman, pp. 66–67.
  9. 1 2 Mark Hertsgaard (1983). Nuclear Inc. The Men and Money Behind Nuclear Energy, Pantheon Books, New York, p. 72.
  10. Jim Falk (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power, Oxford University Press, p. 95.
  11. The San Jose Three TIME, Feb. 16, 1976.
  12. The Struggle over Nuclear Power TIME, Mar. 08, 1976.
  13. World Nuclear Association (1999). Three Mile Island: 1979 Archived 2013-02-17 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved December 24, 2008.
  14. "14-Year Cleanup at Three Mile Island Concludes". New York Times. August 15, 1993. Retrieved March 28, 2011.
  15. Benjamin K. Sovacool. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007, Energy Policy 36 (2008), p. 1807.
  16. Mangano, Joseph (2004). Three Mile Island: Health study meltdown, Bulletin of the atomic scientists, 60(5), pp. 31 -35.
  17. World Nuclear Association. Three Mile Island Accident Archived 2013-02-17 at the Wayback Machine January 2010.
  18. Wellock, Thomas R. Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective (Book review) The Historian, 22 September 2005.
  19. Mark Hertsgaard (1983). Nuclear Inc. The Men and Money Behind Nuclear Energy, Pantheon Books, New York, p. 95 & 97.
  20. Benjamin K. Sovacool. A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, August 2010, pp. 393–400.
  21. "Report: Nuclear sub suffers accident off Oregon in 1973".
  22. "Appendix VI - IAEA international nuclear events scale (INES)". www.iaea.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-30.
  23. Chen, Fu-Chen; Jahanshahi, Mohammad R. (2018-03-27). "Video-based crack detection using deep learning and Nave Bayes data fusion". In Sohn, Hoon (ed.). Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2018. Vol. 10598. International Society for Optics and Photonics. pp. 105980J. Bibcode:2018SPIE10598E..0JC. doi:10.1117/12.2296772. ISBN   9781510616929. S2CID   173187747.
  24. Bel, Hubert T. l. "Inspector General Report – Ind" (PDF). Office of the Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
  25. Blade, Toledo. "Davis-Besse stirs again". Toledo Blade.
  26. Coleman, Korva (January 31, 2012). "Illinois Nuclear Power Plant Shuts Down Unit After Power Loss". NPR. Retrieved 2024-01-26.
  27. ABC7. "Byron nuclear plant loses power, reactor shuts down | ABC7 Chicago | abc7chicago.com". ABC7 Chicago. Retrieved 2024-01-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  28. About NRC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 2007-6-1.
  29. Our Governing Legislation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 2007-6-1.
  30. 1 2 Nathan Hultman and Jonathan Koomey (1 May 2013). "Three Mile Island: The driver of US nuclear power's decline?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 69 (3): 63–70. Bibcode:2013BuAtS..69c..63H. doi:10.1177/0096340213485949. S2CID   145756891.
  31. Mark Cooper (2012). "Nuclear safety and affordable reactors: Can we have both?" (PDF). Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists .
  32. Eric Wesoff, Greentechmedia. "Black & Veatch’s 2011 Electric Utility Survey." June 16, 2011. Retrieved October 11, 2011.
  33. 1 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011). "The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle" (PDF). p. xv.
  34. Mark Cooper (July 2011). "The implications of Fukushima: The US perspective". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 67 (4): 9. doi:10.1177/0096340211414840. S2CID   146270304.
  35. Andrew Restuccia (2011-10-20). "Nuke regulators toughen safety rules". The Hill. Archived from the original on 2012-01-14.

Further reading