Saxton Nuclear Generating Station

Last updated
Saxton Nuclear Experiment Station
Saxon NPP 1961.jpg
The Saxon nuclear power plant under construction in 1961. The hemispherical-topped structure to the left housed the nuclear reactor.
Saxton Nuclear Generating Station
CountryUnited States
Location Liberty Township, Bedford County, near Saxton, Pennsylvania
Coordinates 40°13′37″N78°14′31″W / 40.22694°N 78.24194°W / 40.22694; -78.24194
StatusDecommissioned; site released for unrestricted use
Construction began1960
Commission date November 1961 [1]
Decommission dateMay 1972 [2]
Owner(s)Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corp (SNEC) and GPU Nuclear[ clarification needed ]
Operator(s)Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corp (SNEC) and GPU Nuclear[ clarification needed ]
Nuclear power station
Reactor typePressurized Water Reactor
Reactor supplierWestinghouse
Power generation
Nameplate capacity 23.5 MW-thermal [1]
External links
Commons Related media on Commons

The Saxton Nuclear Experiment Station, [3] also known as the Saxton Nuclear Generating Station or Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Facility, was a small nuclear power plant located in Bedford County, near Saxton, Pennsylvania.

Contents

Design

The Saxton nuclear power plant was a small, light water, pressurized water reactor. The plant was sited immediately east of an existing coal fueled electricity generating plant, the 1923 Saxton Steam Generating Station, [4] to share systems and components; the nuclear power plant did not have its own turbine or generator. [5]

The nuclear reactor and associated systems were designed and constructed by Westinghouse Electric Corporation; nuclear fuel was likewise fabricated and supplied by Westinghouse from allocations of uranium-235 provided by the Atomic Energy Commission. The reactor coolant system contained a single loop of piping and components, including the reactor vessel, reactor coolant pump, pressurizer, and steam generator. Unlike some contemporary low pressure and low temperature pressurized water reactors (e.g. the Westinghouse TR-2), Saxton operated at pressures and temperatures typical of later commercial nuclear reactors; nominal reactor coolant system pressure was 2,250 psig and reactor vessel average temperature of 493 degrees Fahrenheit. [6] As the facility was designed to perform testing and development functions, a superheated steam test loop was among the reactor's features. Additional equipment included process systems piping and components, a water filled spent fuel pool, and an overhead polar crane. [7] [8]

The reactor vessel and reactor coolant system were housed inside of a steel containment vessel. The steel containment vessel was a right cylinder topped by a hemispherical dome with an embedded semi-hemispherical lower head. The containment vessel was 109 feet tall by 50 feet in diameter. To provide radiological shielding and protection from environmental hazards, approximately 50 percent of the structure was below the surrounding grade. Underground tunnels connected the containment vessel and enclosed systems to other facilities and the adjacent steam plant. [7]

The plant was located in a elbow of the Raystown Branch Juniata River, approximately 3/4 mile north of downtown Saxton.

Nuclear fuel

The Saxton reactor was unique and notable in its early, routine use of mixed oxide fuels, use of fuel assemblies with different fuels together in the same core, and use of fuels with differing cladding materials. By way of example, the second core loading contained fuel assemblies of the following attributes:

The stainless steel, Zirconium, and Zirconium / stainless steel fuel rods were contained within cylindrical fuel "cans" fabricated of perforated stainless steel. The cans were in turn held in a 9 x 9 rod position matrix in fuel assemblies with a square cross section. Fuel assemblies included positions for control rods, instrumentation, and other inserts; fuel assemblies contained between 32 and 72 individual fuel rods. The Saxton core held a total of 21 fuel assemblies. [10] [8]

Operation

Construction began in February 1960 on the Saxton Nuclear Experimental Generating Station. The facility was privately financed. Westinghouse Electric Corporation designed and built the reactor. By the end of 1960, construction was about 35 percent complete. Construction was essentially complete in late 1961. The plant was connected to an existing turbine generator at the immediately adjacent Saxton Steam Generating Station of Pennsylvania Electric Company for production of electrical power. [11] [12] [13]

The plant received its Atomic Energy Commission license to begin operations November 15, 1961. [1]

It had a net power output of 23.5 MW-thermal and 3.25 MW-electric, and its purposes were primarily to research various aspects of nuclear reactor technology and to train personnel. [1] Major areas of research for the plant were the chemical control of reactivity using boron and the use of MOX fuel. [14] The plant hosted many reactor operator trainees from SNEC and customers of Westinghouse. Routine plant operation was more focused on operator training exercises such as reactor shut downs and startups than maximizing electrical generation. For example, in July 1969 the reactor was shut down and the brought back to criticality 79 times to provide training opportunities. [6]

Shutdown and decommissioning

August 2024 photo of the former plant site Site of Saxton Nuclear Power Plant, Aug. 2024.jpg
August 2024 photo of the former plant site

The plant was shut down in May 1972 and decommissioned. After shutdown, the reactor fuel was removed from the facility and shipped to the Department of Energy Savannah River Site in South Carolina. [5]

All site decommissioning, decontamination, and remediation work was completed by 2005. Other than some electrical infrastructure which remains as part of the local electricity grid, above ground structures were demolished and removed. [4] [15]

Owners/operators

The owners/operators of the facility were Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation (SNEC) and, ultimately through a series of mergers, General Public Utilities Nuclear. Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation was a consortium of Mid-Atlantic electrical utilities interested in nuclear power.

Status

On November 7, 2005, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission terminated Facility Operating License Number DPR-4 on NRC Docket No. 50-146 and released the site for unrestricted use. [2] [5]

Further reading

Will Davis. "The Hook-Ons" American Nuclear Society.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pressurized water reactor</span> Type of nuclear reactor

A pressurized water reactor (PWR) is a type of light-water nuclear reactor. PWRs constitute the large majority of the world's nuclear power plants. In a PWR, the primary coolant (water) is pumped under high pressure to the reactor core where it is heated by the energy released by the fission of atoms. The heated, high pressure water then flows to a steam generator, where it transfers its thermal energy to lower pressure water of a secondary system where steam is generated. The steam then drives turbines, which spin an electric generator. In contrast to a boiling water reactor (BWR), pressure in the primary coolant loop prevents the water from boiling within the reactor. All light-water reactors use ordinary water as both coolant and neutron moderator. Most use anywhere from two to four vertically mounted steam generators; VVER reactors use horizontal steam generators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pebble-bed reactor</span> Type of very-high-temperature reactor

The pebble-bed reactor (PBR) is a design for a graphite-moderated, gas-cooled nuclear reactor. It is a type of very-high-temperature reactor (VHTR), one of the six classes of nuclear reactors in the Generation IV initiative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear meltdown</span> Reactor accident due to core overheating

A nuclear meltdown is a severe nuclear reactor accident that results in core damage from overheating. The term nuclear meltdown is not officially defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency or by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It has been defined to mean the accidental melting of the core of a nuclear reactor, however, and is in common usage a reference to the core's either complete or partial collapse.

Passive nuclear safety is a design approach for safety features, implemented in a nuclear reactor, that does not require any active intervention on the part of the operator or electrical/electronic feedback in order to bring the reactor to a safe shutdown state, in the event of a particular type of emergency. Such design features tend to rely on the engineering of components such that their predicted behaviour would slow down, rather than accelerate the deterioration of the reactor state; they typically take advantage of natural forces or phenomena such as gravity, buoyancy, pressure differences, conduction or natural heat convection to accomplish safety functions without requiring an active power source. Many older common reactor designs use passive safety systems to a limited extent, rather, relying on active safety systems such as diesel-powered motors. Some newer reactor designs feature more passive systems; the motivation being that they are highly reliable and reduce the cost associated with the installation and maintenance of systems that would otherwise require multiple trains of equipment and redundant safety class power supplies in order to achieve the same level of reliability. However, weak driving forces that power many passive safety features can pose significant challenges to effectiveness of a passive system, particularly in the short term following an accident.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vogtle Electric Generating Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Burke County, Georgia, US

The Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, also known as Plant Vogtle, is a four-unit nuclear power plant located in Burke County, near Waynesboro, Georgia, in the southeastern United States. With a power capacity of 4,536 megawatts, it is the largest nuclear power plant, the largest source of low-carbon electricity, and largest power station overall in the United States. It is also the only nuclear plant in the country with four units. It is named after a former Alabama Power and Southern Company board chairman, Alvin Vogtle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear fuel</span> Material fuelling nuclear reactors

Nuclear fuel is material used in nuclear power stations to produce heat to power turbines. Heat is created when nuclear fuel undergoes nuclear fission. Nuclear fuel has the highest energy density of all practical fuel sources. The processes involved in mining, refining, purifying, using, and disposing of nuclear fuel are collectively known as the nuclear fuel cycle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Containment building</span> Structure surrounding a nuclear reactor to prevent radioactive releases

A containment building is a reinforced steel, concrete or lead structure enclosing a nuclear reactor. It is designed, in any emergency, to contain the escape of radioactive steam or gas to a maximum pressure in the range of 275 to 550 kPa. The containment is the fourth and final barrier to radioactive release, the first being the fuel ceramic itself, the second being the metal fuel cladding tubes, the third being the reactor vessel and coolant system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reactor pressure vessel</span> Nuclear power plant component

A reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in a nuclear power plant is the pressure vessel containing the nuclear reactor coolant, core shroud, and the reactor core.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AP1000</span> American pressurized water cooling nuclear reactor design

The AP1000 is a nuclear power plant designed and sold by Westinghouse Electric Company. The plant is a pressurized water reactor with improved use of passive nuclear safety and many design features intended to lower its capital cost and improve its economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">VVER</span> Soviet / Russian nuclear reactor type

The water-water energetic reactor (WWER), or VVER is a series of pressurized water reactor designs originally developed in the Soviet Union, and now Russia, by OKB Gidropress. The idea of such a reactor was proposed at the Kurchatov Institute by Savely Moiseevich Feinberg. VVER were originally developed before the 1970s, and have been continually updated. As a result, the name VVER is associated with a wide variety of reactor designs spanning from generation I reactors to modern generation III+ reactor designs. Power output ranges from 70 to 1300 MWe, with designs of up to 1700 MWe in development. The first prototype VVER-210 was built at the Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor</span> Nuclear reactor design

The Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) is a passively safe generation III+ reactor design derived from its predecessor, the Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (SBWR) and from the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). All are designs by GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH), and are based on previous Boiling Water Reactor designs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor</span> Decommissioned experimental pressurized water reactor in South Carolina, US

Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor (CVTR), also known as Parr Nuclear Station, was an experimental pressurized tube heavy water nuclear power reactor at Parr, South Carolina in Fairfield County. It was built and operated by the Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power Associates. CVTR was a small test reactor, capable of generating 17 megawatts of electricity. It was officially commissioned in December 1963 and left service in January 1967.

The Nuclear Fuel Complex (NFC) was established in 1971 as a major industrial unit of India's Department of Atomic Energy, as a nuclear plant also specializing in supply of nuclear fuel bundles and reactor core components. It is a unique facility where natural and enriched uranium fuel, zirconium alloy cladding and reactor core components are manufactured under one roof.

The B&W mPower was a proposed small modular reactor designed by Babcock & Wilcox, and to be built by Generation mPower LLC, a joint venture of Babcock & Wilcox and Bechtel. It was a Generation III+ integral pressurized water reactor concept.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corium (nuclear reactor)</span> Material in core during nuclear meltdown

Corium, also called fuel-containing material (FCM) or lava-like fuel-containing material (LFCM), is a material that is created in a nuclear reactor core during a nuclear meltdown accident. Resembling lava in consistency, it consists of a mixture of nuclear fuel, fission products, control rods, structural materials from the affected parts of the reactor, products of their chemical reaction with air, water, steam, and in the event that the reactor vessel is breached, molten concrete from the floor of the reactor room.

Boiling water reactor safety systems are nuclear safety systems constructed within boiling water reactors in order to prevent or mitigate environmental and health hazards in the event of accident or natural disaster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stable salt reactor</span>

The Stable Salt Reactor (SSR) is a nuclear reactor design under development by Moltex Energy Canada Inc. and its subsidiary Moltex Energy USA LLC, based in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, as well as MoltexFLEX Ltd., based in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organic nuclear reactor</span> Nuclear reactor that uses organic liquids for cooling and neutron moderation

An organic nuclear reactor, or organic cooled reactor (OCR), is a type of nuclear reactor that uses some form of organic fluid, typically a hydrocarbon substance like polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), for cooling and sometimes as a neutron moderator as well.

The TR-2 nuclear reactor, also known as the Westinghouse Test Reactor or Westinghouse Testing Reactor (WTR) was a small research and test reactor designed and manufactured by Westinghouse Electric Corporation at their Waltz Mill site near Madison, Pennsylvania, approximately 30 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. TR-2 was the first privately owned research and test reactor. The reactor suffered an accident which involved severe fuel damage in 1960.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "NRC ENDS LICENSE FOR SAXTON EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY, RELEASES SITE FOR UNRESTRICTED USE" (PDF). NRC NEWS. US NRC. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
  2. 1 2 "NRC: Saxton". US NRC. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
  3. TERMINATION OF THE SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORPORATION SITE LICENSE
  4. 1 2 Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation (SNEC) 2005 Annual Report. 09/15/2005. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML052630383.
  5. 1 2 3 Termination of Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Facility Operating License No. DPR-4 (TAC No. MC8350). 11/07/2005. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML052660419.
  6. 1 2 Monthly operating rept for Jul 1969 for Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corp. 07/31/1969. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML20085G789.
  7. 1 2 Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation Facility; Decommissioning Environmental Report Revision 1. February 2000. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML003685273.
  8. 1 2 "Safeguards Rept for Saxton Core III." 08/31/1968. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML20085F974.
  9. "Summary Rept on Buckling of Saxton Core II Fuel Assemblies & Prevention of Buckling in Core III."04/01/1969. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML20085G104.
  10. Discusses Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corp 681218 incident re deformations in housing of irradiated Pu fuel assemblies. 12/19/1968. NRC ADAMS Accession Number ML20084N994.
  11. McCone, John A. The Atomic Energy Commission's Annual Report to Congress for 1960. Major Activities in the Atomic Energy Programs, January - December 1960. United States: N. p., 1961. Web. doi:10.2172/1364334.
  12. Seaborg, Glenn T. The Atomic Energy Commission's Annual Report to Congress for 1961. Major Activities in the Atomic Energy Programs, January - December 1961. United States: N. p., 1962. Web. doi:10.2172/1364338.
  13. NUCLEAR REACTORS BUILT, BUILDING, OR PLANNED IN THE UNITED STATES AS OF JUNE 30, 1960. Country unknown/Code not available: N. p., 1961. Web. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4072674
  14. "The Hook-Ons". ANS Nuclear Cafe. Retrieved 3 August 2017.
  15. Kathy Mellott. "After $75 million, nuke site clean". October 11, 2005. (Johnstown, PA) Tribune-Democrat. https://www.tribdem.com/news/local_news/after-75-million-nuke-site-clean/article_dd63eed1-a37c-5754-ac5a-413ebdc310a5.html