1947 Rawalpindi massacres

Last updated

1947 Rawalpindi massacres
Rawalpindi massacres Thamali.jpg
Skeletal remains of people burned to death at Thamali during the Rawalpindi massacres
DateMarch 1947
Location
Rawalpindi Division, Punjab, British India
Caused by Muslim mobs
Goals
Methods
Parties
Muslim mobs
Lead figures
Casualties
Death(s)2,000 – 7,000

The 1947 Rawalpindi massacres (also 1947 Rawalpindi riots) refer to widespread violence, massacres, and rapes of Hindus and Sikhs by Muslim mobs in the Rawalpindi Division of the Punjab Province of British India in March 1947. The violence preceded the partition of India and was instigated and perpetrated by the Muslim League National Guards—the militant wing of the Muslim League—as well as local cadres and politicians of the League, demobilised Muslim soldiers, local officials and policemen. [1] [2] It followed the fall of a coalition government of the Punjab Unionists, Indian National Congress and Akali Dal, achieved through a six-week campaign by the Muslim League. The riots left between 2,000 and 7,000 Sikhs and Hindus dead, and set off their mass exodus from Rawalpindi Division. [3] [4] 80,000 Sikhs and Hindus were estimated to have left the Division by the end of April. [5] The incidents were the first instance of partition-related violence in Punjab to show clear manifestations of ethnic cleansing, [6] [7] and marked the beginning of systematic violence against women that accompanied the partition, seeing rampant sexual violence, rape, and forced conversions, with many women committing mass suicides along with their children, and many killed by their male relatives, for fear of abduction and rape. [8] [9] The events are sometimes referred to as the Rape of Rawalpindi. [a]

Contents

Background

Punjab Province with the northernmost Rawalpindi Division highlighted in cyan Punjab 1909 (Rawalpindi division).jpg
Punjab Province with the northernmost Rawalpindi Division highlighted in cyan

In the 1946 Punjab provincial election, the Muslim League (ML) won 75 of the 86 Muslim seats in the province and emerged as the biggest party, but failed to win any non-Muslim ones and fell short of the magic figure in the 175 seat assembly. [b] The Muslim zamindar-led secular Unionist Party, which had won 18 seats, of whom 10 were Muslim, formed a coalition government with the Indian National Congress, which was the second biggest winner after the ML, winning 51 seats, and the Shiromani Akali Dal, which had won 20 seats, all from Sikh constituencies. [c] The Unionist leader Khizar Hayat Tiwana was elected the premier. [14]

After withdrawing from the Cabinet Mission plan in July 1946, Muslim League leader Muhammad Ali Jinnah called for "Direct Action" in August. The calls for direct action were followed by large-scale rioting and violence in Calcutta, which gradually spread elsewhere during the following months. [15] [d] In December 1946, rioting was reported from the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) after a Muslim League campaign to oust the Congress government in that province. [17] The neighbouring Rawalpindi Division received thousands of Hindu and Sikh refugees who had been driven out from the Hazara district of NWFP. [18] [19] In January 1947, Tiwana banned the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Muslim League National Guard, which prompted large "direct action" demonstrations by the Muslim League throughout the province that later turned violent. [20] [21] The Muslim League campaign worsened communal tensions in the province, which had already been raised after previous year's election campaign. [22] On 20 February 1947, British Prime Minister Clement Attlee announced that the British will leave India by June 1948.

Events

On 2 March 1947, Khizar Hayat Tiwana resigned as premier in light of the Muslim League agitations and campaign against his ministry, and the official announcement of the imminent end of British rule. [16] [17] Although anticipated, a Muslim League-led coalition could not form due to the League's inability to assuage the fears of non-Muslim legislators, who had become increasingly hostile to the League and the demand for Pakistan. [23] [e] Akali Dal leader Master Tara Singh notoriously made a public spectacle of his disapproval of the Pakistan demand outside the Punjab Assembly on 3 March. [24] [25] Communal clashes erupted in Lahore and Amritsar on 4 March after Hindus and Sikhs began demonstrations against the Pakistan demand. On 5 March, which marked the Hindu festival of Holi, armed Muslim mobs started attacking Hindus and Sikhs in several cities of West Punjab, including the cantonment town of Rawalpindi and Multan, killing close to 200 in the latter with the casualties being mostly Hindu. [26] [27] Several villages in the Multan District were attacked after dark, and many Hindus were killed and their properties looted or destroyed. [28] With no government in sight, Governor Evan Jenkins imposed governor's rule in Punjab. [29]

The rioting soon spread from the towns to the rural areas of Rawalpindi Division in northern Punjab. Faced with resistance from the Hindus and Sikhs in the divisional headquarters of Rawalpindi, Muslim mobs banded together and turned to the countryside. [30] [17] [31] [f] The mobs went on a rampage, engaging in arson, looting, massacres and rape, one village after the other in the districts of Rawalpindi, Jhelum and Cambellpur (present-day Attock). Sikhs were the primary targets, but Hindus were also attacked. In one incident, on 7 March, a train was raided by a mob at Taxila, which killed 22 Hindu and Sikh passengers. [33] Houses in the Sikh and Hindu quarters of the village of Kahuta were torched with their occupants present inside, while women were abducted to be raped. [34]

Two children who survived the massacres with sustained burn injuries. Rawalpindi massacres survivors children.jpg
Two children who survived the massacres with sustained burn injuries.

The village of Thoha Khalsa was the site of a much-publicised massacre. An armed Muslim mob laid siege to the village, asking the Sikh residents to convert to Islam. Sikh men killed female members of their families to prevent their abduction and rape, before being killed themselves by the attackers. More than 90 Sikh women and children committed mass suicide after jumping into a well to avoid rape. [35] [5] [36] [37] The death toll at the village is estimated to be around 300. A similar massacre, mass suicide and looting also took place at the village of Choa Khalsa, where around 150 Sikhs—and a smaller number of Hindus—were killed, [37] and in the Sikh village of Dhamali. [38]

In Bewal village, a house where villagers had taken refuge was besieged and villagers were asked to surrender their arms and convert to Islam. One group of the villagers took up the offer and were subsequently converted, while the remaining were periodically attacked. The house was set on fire, following which the villagers shifted to a Gurdwara where they were attacked and massacred. One survivor claimed that out of a total of 500 Hindu and Sikh villagers, only 76 had survived, of whom nearly half had been abducted. [39] Similar attacks happened at the villages of Mughal and Bassali. [40] Kallar, Dubheran, Jhika Gali and Kuri were also attacked. [41] [42] Some of the survivors had been left disfigured and mutilated, breasts of many women who had been raped were cut-off. [43] Villages in the Gujar Khan and Cambellpur districts were decimated, dead bodies of children were found hanging from trees and girls as young as eleven had been gang-raped. [42] The All India Congress Committee, in its report on the violence, described the strategy of the attacks as follows: [44] [ undue weight? discuss ]

First of all minorities were disarmed with the help of local police and by giving assurances by oaths on holy Quran of peaceful intentions. After this had been done, the helpless and unarmed minorities were attacked. On their resistance having collapsed, lock breakers and looters came into action with their transport corps of mules, donkeys and camels. Then came the ‘Mujahadins’ with tins of petrol and kerosene oil and set fire to the looted shops and houses. Then there were maulvis with barbers to convert people who somehow or other escaped slaughter and rape. The barbers shaved the hair and beards and circumcised the victims. Maulvis recited kalamas and performed forcible marriage ceremonies. After this came the looters, including women and children.

Similar accounts of the attacks are recounted in first information reports (FIRs) given to the police by survivors. [45]

A group of male survivors of the massacre, who were converted to Islam and subsequently had their kesh (unshorn hair) cut to short length Rawalpindi massacres survivors men.jpg
A group of male survivors of the massacre, who were converted to Islam and subsequently had their kesh (unshorn hair) cut to short length

The attacks were premeditated, and rumours were spread through mosques to instigate Muslim villagers. [46] [47] The attackers are said to have received weapons and funds from outside, and were partly funded by the Muslim League. [48] They were armed with guns, rifles, axes, swords, spears, sticks, and in two cases with hand grenades. [49] Houses of those driven out were razed and subsequently flattened up to prevent them from returning and rebuilding. [50] [51] Muslim houses were sometimes marked by their occupants to allow the attackers to distinguish them from houses of non-Muslims. [28] The ancestral home of Tara Singh was also reduced to ashes. The mobs continued their campaign of loot and mass murder without hindrance. [50] Muslim policemen aided and abetted the violence at many places throughout West Punjab, and at times responded inordinately late to appeals for help. [52] [g] There is evidence of involvement of Muslim League cadres and local politicians in the attacks, [54] but little evidence directly implicating the top leadership of the Muslim League—including Jinnah. [46] However, no leaders of the Muslim League, national or provincial, offered any condemnation of the massacres. [55] [h]

Aftermath and Impact

Louis Mountbatten inspecting burned buildings in Kahuta in the aftermath of the massacres Lord Mountbatten visits Punjabi riot scenes.jpg
Louis Mountbatten inspecting burned buildings in Kahuta in the aftermath of the massacres

The violence ceased by the middle of March. [i] At many places, attacks ended after the army moved in to rescue survivors. Many villages had their entire population wiped out while others had few survivors. [56] The official death toll for non-Muslims killed in the Rawalpindi district alone stood at 2,263, [j] however, this number was considered inaccurate due to "the widespread nature of disturbances" and a collapse of "normal administrative machinery". [57] The number was based on registered police cases and did not include such cases "where whole families were wiped out and no claims were made". [57] A contemporary Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee report put the number of dead at over 7,000. [58] Later scholars have given estimates ranging between 4,000 and 8,000 dead in the rural areas of Rawalpindi. [59] [60]

Many women were abducted during the violence. 70 were abducted from the Doberan village, 40 from Harial, 30 from Tainch, 95 from Rajar and 105 from Bamali. A further 500 were abducted from Kahuta and between 400 and 500 were abducted from Rawalpindi. Abducted women were often sold multiple times and raped by their captors. [61]

The massacres triggered a mass-migration of Sikhs and Hindus from the Rawalpindi Division to central and eastern Punjab, Sikh-ruled princely states, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi and the United Provinces. The descriptions of atrocities faced by these refugees provoked feelings of revenge, especially among the Sikhs. [62] [63] [64] The massacres had a deep impact on the Sikhs and Hindus of the Punjab, who planned to avenge them later by unleashing similar violence on the Muslims of the eastern portions of the province, to make way for the settlement of the refugees who had been driven out from the west. [5] [65] [66] [67] The Sikhs, in particular, felt especially humiliated as parts of the Muslim press taunted them after the massacres. [68] The absence of condemnation of the massacres by leaders of the Muslim League widened the growing rift between the League and the Sikhs. [69] The riots also lead to the Congress and Sikh leaders of the Punjab demanding its partition. [70] On 8 March, the Congress Working Committee passed a resolution to partition the Punjab. [71] [72]

Survivors identified attackers by their names, occupations and home villages in FIRs after the massacres. [73] Despite identification by fact-finding committees, few of the perpetrators were ever brought to justice, partly because of communal polarisation of the legal system. [63] The British administration threatened penalties for the worst cases of official negligence, however, these threats carried little weight owing to impending British withdrawal from the region. [74] Statements by the Muslim League were seen to be of more consequence; one prominent politician of the League offered protection for perpetrators and threatened action against such officials who maintained law and order, in the Attock district. [74] This established a precedent of impunity for officials and policemen acting in a biased manner. [63] Such failures to prosecute the perpetrators are seen to have enabled the later violence in Punjab, closer to the partition. [75]

Legacy

The events have produced some of the most unforgettable images of the partition violence. [5] Those who died in the violence, especially those who killed themselves or were killed by their families to prevent anticipated conversion, rapes, abductions or forced marriages—which were seen as violative of community honour—were valorised for their sacrifice and continue to be seen as martyrs in the Sikh community. [76] [k] [l]

Cultural depictions

Images of the aftermath of the massacres were compiled by politician Prabodh Chandra and published in a booklet titled Rape of Rawalpindi in 1947, soon after the massacres. The circulation of this booklet was stopped by the government fearing retaliation against Muslims in East Punjab. [58] [m] The events, in particular the massacre and mass suicide at Thoha Khalsa, were depicted in the 1988 television film Tamas , directed by Govind Nihalani. The film was based on Bhisham Sahni's Hindi novel of the same name. [79] [n] An incident similar to the Thoha Khalsa mass suicide is also depicted in the 2003 film Khamosh Pani . [81] A Punjabi novel based on the events called Khoon de Sohille written by Nanak Singh was published in 1948. It was translated into English as Hymns in Blood (2022). [82] Other works based on the violence include Kartar Singh Duggal’s 1951 Punjabi novel Nahun te maas (translated into English as Twice Born Twice Dead in 1979) and Shauna Singh Baldwin’s 1999 English novel What the Body Remembers. [83]

Notes

  1. The earliest use of this term comes from an eponymous 1947 booklet containing images from the massacres, compiled and published soon after the massacres. [10] [11]
  2. Bertrand Glancy, the governor of the province at the time, estimated that the League had the support of only 80 members overall. [12]
  3. The coalition ministry claimed to have the support of 94 members in total. [13]
  4. The Punjab province is said to have remained unaffected by such violence due to the coalition government in place. [16]
  5. Much of this increased hostility is blamed on the League’s communal election campaign and later agitations in Punjab. [23]
  6. Some mobs had also come from neighbouring Hazara. [32]
  7. Muslims comprised close to 75% of the police force in the Punjab province as a whole. [53]
  8. Political Scientist Ishtiaq Ahmed notes that Jinnah had issued strong condemnations for killings of Muslims in Bihar a few months earlier, but never did so for the Rawalpindi massacres. [54]
  9. Attacks continued till 13 March, while at some places they continued till 15 March.
  10. This figure was mentioned in a note by the Home Secretary to Punjab Government in July 1947. The number of Muslim deaths stood at 38 according to it. [57]
  11. An early example of this was when an April 1947 report in The Statesman compared the Thoha Khalsa mass suicide with the Rajput tradition of jauhar (self-immolation by women and children to avoid rape or enslavement by invaders in the face of defeat in a war). [77]
  12. Many of those who remember the victims as martyrs are themselves survivors of the massacres, or descendants of survivors.
  13. Historian Yasmin Khan states that the booklet contained one-sided and inflammatory commentary. [78]
  14. Sahni had visited Thoha Khalsa in the aftermath of the massacres. [80]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partition of India</span> 1947 division of British India

The Partition of India in 1947 was the change of political borders and the division of other assets that accompanied the dissolution of the British Raj in South Asia and the creation of two independent dominions: India and Pakistan. The Dominion of India is today the Republic of India, and the Dominion of Pakistan—which at the time comprised two regions lying on either side of India—is now the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh. The partition was outlined in the Indian Independence Act 1947. The change of political borders notably included the division of two provinces of British India, Bengal and Punjab. The majority Muslim districts in these provinces were awarded to Pakistan and the majority non-Muslim to India. The other assets that were divided included the British Indian Army, the Royal Indian Navy, the Royal Indian Air Force, the Indian Civil Service, the railways, and the central treasury. Self-governing independent Pakistan and India legally came into existence at midnight on 14 and 15 August 1947 respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct Action Day</span> 1946 sectarian violence in British India

Direct Action Day was the day the All-India Muslim League decided to take a "direct action" using general strikes and economic shut down to demand a separate Muslim homeland after the British exit from India. Also known as the 1946 Calcutta Riots, it soon became a day of communal violence in Calcutta. It led to large-scale violence between Muslims and Hindus in the city of Calcutta in the Bengal province of British India. The day also marked the start of what is known as The Week of the Long Knives. While there is a certain degree of consensus on the magnitude of the killings, including their short-term consequences, controversy remains regarding the exact sequence of events, the various actors' responsibility and the long-term political consequences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khizar Hayat Tiwana</span> Former Premier of British Punjab

Sir Malik Khizar Hayat TiwanaKCSI, OBE was a British Indian statesman, landowner, army officer, and politician belonging to the Punjab Unionist Party. He served as the prime minister of the Punjab Province of British India between 1942 and 1947. He opposed the Partition of India and the ideology of Muslim League. He was eventually ousted from office by the Muslim League through a civil disobedience campaign, plunging Punjab into communal violence that led to the partition of the province between India and Pakistan.

The National Unionist Party was a political party based in the Punjab Province during the period of British rule in India. The Unionist Party mainly represented the interests of the landed gentry and landlords of Punjab, which included Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs. The Unionists dominated the political scene in Punjab from World War I to the independence of India and the creation Pakistan after the partition of the province in 1947. The party's leaders served as Prime Minister of the Punjab. The creed of the Unionist Party emphasized: "Dominion Status and a United Democratic federal constitution for India as a whole".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominion of Pakistan</span> 1947–1956 monarchy in South Asia

The Dominion of Pakistan, officially Pakistan, was an independent federal dominion in the British Commonwealth of Nations, which existed from 14 August 1947 to 23 March 1956. It was created by the passing of the Indian Independence Act 1947 by the British parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sikhism in Pakistan</span> Overview of the role and impact of Sikhism in Pakistan

Sikhism in Pakistan has an extensive heritage and history, although Sikhs form a small community in Pakistan today. Most Sikhs live in the province of Punjab, a part of the larger Punjab region where the religion originated in the Middle Ages, with some also residing in Peshawar in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province. Nankana Sahib, the birthplace of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, is located in Pakistan's Punjab province. Moreover, the place where Guru Nanak died, the Gurudwara Kartarpur Sahib is also located in the same province.

Punjabi Hindus are adherents of Hinduism who identify ethnically, linguistically, culturally, and genealogically as Punjabis and are natives of the Punjab region of the Indian subcontinent. Punjabi Hindus are the second-largest religious group of the Punjabi community, after the Punjabi Muslims. While Punjabi Hindus mostly inhabit the Indian state of Punjab, as well as Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, and Chandigarh today, many have ancestry across the greater Punjab region, which was partitioned between India and Pakistan in 1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gurbachan Singh Talib</span>

Sardar Gurbachan Singh was a Sikh scholar, professor, and author. He was born in Moonak, Sangrur district. He was a lecturer at the Sikh National College at Lahore. At the Banaras Hindu University he held the Guru Nanak Chair of Sikh Studies. He received the Padma Bhushan in 1985. He received in 1985 the National fellowship by the Indian Council of Historical Research, New Delhi.

Thoha Khalsa is a village in Kahuta Tehsil, Rawalpindi District in Punjab Province of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jatha</span> Sikh armed organization

A Jatha is an armed body of Sikhs that has existed in Sikh tradition since 1699, the beginning of the Khalsa. A Jatha basically means a group of people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muslim League National Guard</span> Paramilitary organization in the Indian subcontinent

Muslim League National Guard, or Muslim National Guard, was the name of a quasi-paramilitary Islamist organization associated with the All-India Muslim League that took part in the Pakistan Movement. It was active in the violence that ensued during the Partition of India and later the Kashmir conflict.

During the Partition of India, violence against women occurred extensively. It is estimated that during the partition between 75,000 and 100,000 women were kidnapped and raped. The rape of women by men during this period is well documented, with women sometimes also being complicit in these attacks. In March 1947, systematic violence against women started in Rawalpindi where Sikh women were targeted by Muslim mobs. Violence was also perpetrated on an organized basis, with Pathans taking Hindu and Sikh women from refugee trains while armed Sikhs periodically dragged Muslim women from their refugee column and killing any men who resisted, while the military sepoys guarding the columns did nothing.

Dera Khalsa is a village in the Kallar Syedan Tehsil, Rawalpindi District, Punjab province of Pakistan. The name was given by rulers of this region during Sikh rule in Punjab. This name is still used to refer this village. Presently the entire population of this village is Muslim, having strong religious beliefs and 95% of existing families are migrated from Jammu in 1947. Presently residing families settled in this village in 1951–52.

Choa Khalsa is a town and union council of Kallar Syedan Tehsil, Rawalpindi District, Punjab, Pakistan. The town consists of 800 houses. On 1 July 2004, Choa Khalsa became a union council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1947 Jammu massacres</span> Genocidal massacres in Jammu

After the Partition of India, during October–November 1947 in the Jammu region of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, many Muslims were massacred and others driven away to West Punjab. The killings were carried out by extremist Hindus and Sikhs, aided and abetted by the forces of Maharaja Hari Singh. The activists of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) played a key role in planning and executing the riots. An estimated 20,000–100,000 Muslims were massacred. Subsequently, many non-Muslims were massacred by Pakistani tribesmen, in the Mirpur region of today's Pakistani administered Kashmir, and also in the Rajouri area of Jammu division.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to the Partition of India</span> Political viewpoint in South Asian politics

Opposition to the Partition of India was widespread in British India in the 20th century and it continues to remain a talking point in South Asian politics. Those who opposed it often adhered to the doctrine of composite nationalism in the Indian subcontinent. The Hindu, Christian, Anglo-Indian, Parsi and Sikh communities were largely opposed to the Partition of India, as were many Muslims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1946 Punjab Provincial Assembly election</span> Punjab Assembly Election of 1946

Elections to the Punjab Provincial Assembly were held in January 1946 as part of the 1946 Indian provincial elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1947 Amritsar train massacre</span> 1947 massacre in Amritsar, India

An attack on a railway train carrying Muslim refugees during the Partition of India was carried out at Amritsar in Indian Punjab on 22 September 1947. Three thousand Muslim refugees were killed and a further one thousand wounded. Only one hundred passengers remained uninjured. These murders demonstrated that railway carriages provided very little protection from physical assault. After several such attacks on Muslim refugees by Sikhs armed with rifles, swords, and spears, the Government of Pakistan stopped all trains from the Indian Punjab to the Pakistani Punjab at the end of September 1947. The Sikh Jathas, which were ruthless, led the attacks for ethnically cleansing the Eastern Punjab of its Muslim population. Earlier in September, they had massacred 1,000 Muslim refugees on a Pakistan-bound train near Khalsa College, Amritsar. The violence was the most pronounced in the Indian East Punjab.

The 1947 Kamoke train massacre was an attack on a refugee train and subsequent massacre of Hindu and Sikh refugees by a Muslim mob at Kamoke, Pakistan on 24 September 1947 following the partition of India. The train was carrying around 3,000-3,500 refugees from West Punjab and was attacked 25 miles from Lahore by a mob of thousands of Muslims. Figures for the number of people killed vary, with West Punjab officials reporting figures of around 400 and East Punjab-based reports suggesting thousands of casualties. Additionally, around 600 female refugees were abducted by the attackers. Local railway officials, Muslim League National Guards and local goons aided and participated in the massacre and the subsequent abductions of the surviving female refugees.

References

  1. Ahmed 2011, p. 685.
  2. Hajari 2015, p. 108.
  3. Ahmed 2011, pp. 221, 374.
  4. Butalia 2000, p. 183.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Pandey 2001, p. 24.
  6. Talbot 2019, p. 10.
  7. Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 67.
  8. Major 1995, p. 59.
  9. Butalia 2013, p. 73.
  10. Chandra, Prabodh Rape of Rawalpindi (1947)
  11. Ahmed 2011, p. 221.
  12. Ahmed 2022, p. 113.
  13. Talbot 2013, pp. 149–150.
  14. Talbot 2013, p. 148.
  15. Brass 2003, p. 76.
  16. 1 2 Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 178.
  17. 1 2 3 Pandey 2001, p. 23.
  18. Hajari 2015, p. 88.
  19. Ahmed 2022, pp. 131–132.
  20. Ahmed 2019, p. 52.
  21. Hajari 2015, pp. 97–99.
  22. Talbot & Singh 2009, pp. 74–75.
  23. 1 2 Talbot 2013, p. 161.
  24. Hajari 2015, pp. 103-104: "A crowd of Leaguers had gathered outside [the Punjab Assembly] to heckle the Hindu and Sikh politicians, shouting "Quaid-i-Azam Zindabad!" and "Pakistan Zindabad!" Tara Singh whipped his kirpan out of his scabbard and waved it above his head. "Pakistan Murdabad!" he roared. Death to Pakistan!".
  25. Khan 2017, pp. 84–85.
  26. Ahmed 2011, p. 207.
  27. Hajari 2015, p. 104.
  28. 1 2 Chatterjee, Chanda (1998). "Muslim League Direct Action and Popular Reaction in the Punjab: The Multan and Rawalpindi Riots, March 1947". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 59: 834–43. JSTOR   44147056 . Retrieved 12 April 2023.
  29. Ahmed 2019, p. 53.
  30. Ahmed 2019, p. 23.
  31. Ahmed 2011, pp. 239–240.
  32. Ahmed 2011, p. 212.
  33. Ahmed 2022, p. 219.
  34. Ahmed 2011, p. 223.
  35. Butalia 2013, p. 45.
  36. Hajari 2015, p. 111.
  37. 1 2 Singh, Ajmer. "The March Massacre in Pothohar". The Tribune . Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  38. Ahmed 2022, pp. 223–231.
  39. Pandey 2002, p. 173.
  40. Pandey 2002, pp. 172, 175.
  41. Pandey 2002, p. 177.
  42. 1 2 Talbot 2009, p. 47.
  43. Ahmed 2011, p. 238.
  44. Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 85.
  45. Pandey 2002, p. 172.
  46. 1 2 Hajari 2015 , p. 108
  47. Khosla 1989, p.107: "On March 6 meetings were held in the village mosques and the Muslims were told that the Jumma Masjid at Rawalpindi had been razed to the ground by Hindus and Sikhs and that the city streets were littered with Muslim corpses. The audience was exhorted to avenge these wrongs.".
  48. Abid, Abdul Majeed (29 December 2014). "The forgotten massacre". The Nation . Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  49. Pandey 2002, p. 171.
  50. 1 2 Hajari 2015 , p. 109
  51. Ahmed 2022, p. 240.
  52. Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 87.
  53. Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 86.
  54. 1 2 Ahmed 2022, p. 685.
  55. Ahmed 2022, p. 220.
  56. Butalia 2013, p. 198.
  57. 1 2 3 Khosla 1989, p. 112.
  58. 1 2 Ahmed 2022, p. 221.
  59. Butalia 2000, p.183: "Here [in Sikh villages around Rawalpindi], during an 8 day period from 6 March to 13 March much of the Sikh population was killed (estimates suggest 4–5,000 dead), houses were decimated, gurudwaras destroyed..
  60. Talbot 2019, p.4: "The attacks on largely defenceless minority populations have earcned the violence the title of the Rawalpindi Massacres. Outlying villages in the Rawalpindi district witnessed shocking violence against Sikh inhabitants. Around seven thousand to eight thousand people were estimated to have died.".
  61. Butalia 2000, p. 187.
  62. Ahmed 2019, p. 54.
  63. 1 2 3 Talbot 2019, p. 5.
  64. Chattha, Ilyas (2011), Partition and Locality: Violence, Migration and Development in Gujranwala and Sialkot, 1947–1961, Karachi: Oxford University Press, p. 161, ISBN   978-0-19-906172-3
  65. Brass 2003, p. 88.
  66. Hajari 2015, p. 157.
  67. Ahmed 2022, pp. 65, 693.
  68. Pandey 2001, p. 25.
  69. Ahmed 2022, pp. 2, 220.
  70. Talbot & Singh 2009, p. 138.
  71. Butalia 2013, p. 91.
  72. Ahmed 2022, p. 90.
  73. Pandey 2002, pp. 174–175.
  74. 1 2 Talbot 2009, p. 48.
  75. Talbot 2009, p. 52.
  76. Butalia 2000, p. 189.
  77. Butalia 2000, p. 190.
  78. Khan 2017, p. 138.
  79. Saint 2020, pp. 99–105.
  80. Sahni, Bhisham; Singh, Pankaj K. (1995). "Making Connections". Indian Literature. 38 (3 (167)): 89–97. JSTOR   23335872 . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
  81. Sharma, Manoj (2009). "Portrayal of Partition in Hindi cinema". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 70: 1155–60. JSTOR   44147759 . Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  82. Dutt, Nirupama (31 July 2022). "Hymns in Blood at Chakri village on River Soan". Hindustan Times . Retrieved 12 April 2023.
  83. Saint 2020, pp. 151–155.

Bibliography